Fillable PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) (Caggia Social Studies)

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) (Caggia Social Studies) Form

Use Fill to complete blank online CAGGIA SOCIAL STUDIES pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) (Caggia Social Studies)

On average this form takes 1 minutes to complete

The PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) (Caggia Social Studies) form is 2 pages long and contains:

  • 0 signatures
  • 0 check-boxes
  • 2 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

Use our library of forms to quickly fill and sign your Caggia Social Studies forms online.

BROWSE CAGGIA SOCIAL STUDIES FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896)
ORIGINS OF THE CASE
In 1892, Homer Plessy took a seat in the “Whites Only” car of
a train and refused to move. He was arrested, tried, and convicted in the District Court of
New Orleans for breaking Louisiana’s segregation law. Plessy appealed, claiming that he
had been denied equal protection under the law. The Supreme Court handed down its
decision on May 18, 1896.
THE RULING
The Court ruled that separate-but-equal facilities for blacks and whites did
not violate the Constitution.
496 C
HAPTER 16
LEGAL REASONING
Plessy claimed that segregation violated his right to equal protection under the law.
Moreover he claimed that, being “of mixed descent,” he was entitled to “every recog-
nition, right, privilege and immunity secured to the citizens of the United States of
the white race.”
Justice Henry B. Brown, writing for the majority, ruled:
“ The object of the [Fourteenth] amendment was
. . . undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the
two races before the law, but . . . it could not have
been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color,
or to enforce social, as distinguished from political
equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms
unsatisfactory to either. Laws permitting, and even
requiring, their separation in places where they are
liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily
imply the inferiority of either race to the other.
”
In truth, segregation laws did perpetrate an
unequal and inferior status for African Americans.
Justice John Marshall Harlan understood this fact and
dissented from the majority opinion.
He wrote, “In respect of civil
rights, all citizens are equal
before the law.” He con-
demned the majority
for letting “the seeds of
race hate . . . be plant-
ed under the sanction
of law.” He also
warned that “The
thin disguise of ‘equal’
accommodations . . .
will not mislead any
one, nor atone for the
wrong this day done.”
Justice John Marshall Harlan
CIVIL RIGHTS CASES (1883)
The Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment could
not be used to prevent private citizens from discrimi-
nating against others on the basis of race.
WILLIAMS v. MISSISSIPPI (1898)
The Court upheld a state literacy requirement for
voting that, in effect, kept African Americans from
the polls.
CUMMING v. BOARD OF EDUCATION
OF RICHMOND COUNTY (1899)
The Court ruled that the federal government cannot
prevent segregation in local school facilities because
education is a local, not federal, issue.
RELATED CASES
U.S. CONSTITUTION,
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT (1868)
“No state shall . . . deny to any person within its juris-
diction the equal protection of the laws.”
LOUISIANA ACTS 1890, NO. 111
“. . . that all railway companies carrying passengers in
their coaches in this State, shall provide equal but sepa-
rate accommodations for the white, and colored races.”
LEGISLATION
LEGAL SOURCES
p0496-497aspe-0416sc 10/17/02 8:52 AM Page 496
Page 1 of 2
WHY IT MATTERED
In the decades following the Civil War [1861–1865],
Southern state legislatures passed laws that aimed to
limit civil rights for African Americans. The Black
Codes of the 1860s, and later Jim Crow laws, were
intended to deprive African Americans of their newly
won political and social rights granted during
Reconstruction.
Plessy was one of several Supreme Court cases
brought by African Americans to protect their rights
against segregation. In these cases, the Court regularly
ignored the Fourteenth Amendment and upheld state
laws that denied blacks their rights. Plessy was the
most important of these cases because the Court used
it to establish the separate-but-equal doctrine.
As a result, city and state governments across the
South—and in some other states—maintained their
segregation laws for more than half of the 20th century.
These laws limited African Americans’ access to most
public facilities, including restaurants, schools, and
hospitals. Without exception, the facilities reserved for
whites were superior to those reserved for nonwhites.
Signs reading “Colored Only” and “Whites Only”
served as constant reminders that facilities in segre-
gated societies were separate but not equal.
HISTORICAL IMPACT
It took many decades to abolish legal segregation.
During the first half of the 20th century, the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People
(NAACP) led the legal fight to overturn Plessy.
Although they won a few cases over the years, it was
not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education that the
Court overturned any part of Plessy. In that case, the
Supreme Court said that separate-but-equal was
unconstitutional in public education, but it did not
completely overturn the separate-but-equal doctrine.
In later years, the Court did overturn the separate-
but-equal doctrine, and it used the Brown decision to
do so. For example, in 1955, Rosa Parks was convicted
for violating a Montgomery, Alabama, law for segre-
gated seating on buses. A federal court overturned the
conviction, finding such segregation unconstitutional.
The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which
upheld without comment the lower court’s decision.
In doing so in this and similar cases, the Court signaled
that the reasoning behind Plessy no longer applied.
Life at the Turn of the 20th Century 497
As secretary of the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP,
Rosa Parks had protested segregation through everyday
acts long before Sepember 1955.
One result of Jim Crow laws was separate drinking fountains for
whites and African Americans.
▼
▼
THINKING CRITICALLY
THINKING CRITICALLY
CONNECT TO TODAY
1. Analyzing Primary Sources
Read the part of the
Fourteenth Amendment reprinted in this feature. Write a
paragraph explaining what you think “equal protection of
the laws” means. Use evidence to support your ideas.
SEE SKILLBUILDER HANDBOOK, PAGE R22.
CONNECT TO HISTORY
2.
Visit the links for Historic Decisions of the Supreme
Court to research and read Justice Harlan’s entire dis-
sent in Plessy v. Ferguson. Based on his position, what
view might Harlan have taken toward laws that denied
African Americans the right to vote? Write a paragraph or
two expressing what Harlan would say about those laws.
IINTERNET ACTIVITY
CLASSZONE.COM
p0496-497aspe-0416sc 10/17/02 8:52 AM Page 497
Page 2 of 2
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) (Caggia Social Studies)

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 26 February 2021

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document