Fillable Summative Assessment By University Supervisor (University of Central Missouri)

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank Summative Assessment By University Supervisor (University of Central Missouri) Form

Use Fill to complete blank online UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

Summative Assessment By University Supervisor (University of Central Missouri)

On average this form takes 25 minutes to complete

The Summative Assessment By University Supervisor (University of Central Missouri) form is 5 pages long and contains:

  • 3 signatures
  • 64 check-boxes
  • 60 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

U.S.A. forms for University of Central Missouri

BROWSE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
Re
vised April 2016
Teacher Candidate Summative Assessment by University Supervisor.
Teacher Candidate:
Student ID:
Ed Prep Supervisor:
Date:
School:
Cooperating Teacher:
Subject/Grade:
Definition of Candidate Rating Descriptors (refer to the Rubric for Teacher Candidate for a detailed description)
Baseline – 0: the teacher candidate possesses the necessary knowledge but cannot apply or demonstrate the performance
Emerging – 1: the teacher candidate possesses the necessary knowledge and inconsistently
and somewhat effectively demonstrates the performance at the Emerging Level
Emerging – 2: the teacher candidate possesses the necessary knowledge and consistently and effectively demonstrates the performance at the Emerging Level
Developing – 3: the teacher candidate demonstrates consistently at the Emerging Level and is beginning to demonstrate at the Developing Level
Standard #1: Content Knowledge Aligned with Appropriate Instruction
0
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
1.1 Content Knowledge and Academic Language
1.2 Student Engagement in Subject Matter
Standard #1 Comments:
Standard #2: Student Learning Growth and Development
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
2.4 Differentiated Lesson Design
Standard #2 Comments:
Standard #3: Curriculum Implementation
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
3.1 Implementation of Curriculum Standards
3.2 Lessons for Diverse Learners
Standard #3 Comments: :
Revised April 2016
Standard #4: Critical Thinking
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
4.1 Instructional Strategies Leading to Student Engagement in Problem-Solving and
Critical Thinking
Standard #4 Comments: :
Standard #5: Positive Classroom Environment
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
5.1 Classroom Management Techniques
5.2 Management of Time, Space, Transitions, and Activities
5.3 Classroom, School, and Community Culture
Standard #5 Comments: :
Standard #6: Effective Communication
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
6.1 Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication
Standard #6 Comments: :
Revised April 2016
Standard #7: Student Assessment and Data Analysis
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
7.1 Effective Use of Assessments
7.2 Assessment Data to Improve Learning
7.5 Communication of Student Progress and Maintaining Records
Standard #7 Comments: :
Standard #8: Professionalism
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
8.1 Self-Assessment and Improvement
Standard #8 Comments: :
Standard #9: Professional Collaboration
Emerging
1 - Inconsistent 2 – Consistent
Developing
3
9.1 Induction and Collegial Activities
9.3 Cooperative Partnerships in Support of Student Learning
Standard #9 Comments: :
Revised April 2016
Summative Comments/Observations:
Targets for Professional Development (Address all standards marked “Baseline – 0 or Emerging – 1”):
Grade
Teacher Candidate Signature
Date
Ed Prep Supervisor Signature
Date
Cooperating Teacher Signature
Date
*Signatures required are at Ed Prep discretion
click to sign
signature
click to edit
click to sign
signature
click to edit
click to sign
signature
click to edit
Revised April 2016
Tabulating Final Scores for the Teacher Candidate
(To be completed at the end of the Clinical Experience)
Teacher Candidate Name
Quality Indicators
Scores
Cooperating
Teacher
Building
Administrator/Designee
Ed Prep
Supervisor
1.1 Content knowledge and academic language
1.2 Student engagement in subject matter
2.4 Differentiated lesson design
3.1 Implementation of curriculum standards
3.2 Lessons for diverse learners
4.1 Student engagement in critical thinking
5.1 Classroom management techniques
5.2 Management of time, space, transitions, and activities
5.3 Classroom, school & community culture
6.1 Verbal, nonverbal communication
7.1 Effective use of assessments
7.2 Assessment data to improve learning
7.5 Communication of student progress and maintaining records
8.1 Self assessment & improvement
9.1 Induction & collegial activities
9.3 Professional Collaboration
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

Summative Assessment By University Supervisor (University of Central Missouri)

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 24 July 2020

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document