Shippensburg University Undergraduate Grade Appeals Procedure
I. Introduction – An undergraduate student contemplating filing a grade appeal understands that consistent
with the practice of academic freedom, faculty bear responsibility for assigning course grades in accordance
with professionally acceptable standards which have previously been communicated to students verbally or in
writing. At the same time, students have a right to ensure that grades are calculated accurately and
consistently, fairly and equitably, and without discrimination.
Note: Any grade appeals or grade change requests initiated on the basis of alleged academic dishonesty shall
be handled under the procedures set forth for academic dishonesty discussed later in this chapter.
II. Basis for Appealing a Final Course Grade – Undergraduate students may appeal a final course grade
assigned to them by an instructor based on one of four conditions:
A. The course instructor miscalculated the final course grade.
B. The course instructor committed an oversight in calculating the final course grade.
C. The course instructor acted in an arbitrary and/or capricious manner in assigning grades to the student,
including the final course grade.
For an instructor to act in an arbitrary and/or capricious manner in assigning grades is defined as follows:
1. The instructor assigned a course grade to a student on some basis other than performance in the course;
2. The instructor assigned a course grade to a student by resorting to unreasonable standards different
from those which were applied to other students in that course; or
3. The instructor assigned a course grade to a student in a manner that represented a substantial,
unreasonable and unannounced departure from the instructor's previously articulated standards.
D. In assigning grades in the course to the student, the course instructor engaged in discrimination based on
factors that include but are not limited to: race, color, religion, creed, lifestyle, sexual orientation,
ancestry, national origin, age, union membership, gender, disability or political affiliation. This policy
extends to all military veterans as well.
III. Selection and Composition of the Academic Appeals Committee
1. Composition of the Academic Appeals Committee
– The Academic Appeals Committee of the
department shall consist of a minimum of three regular tenure track faculty members in the department
(excluding the Department Chairperson) and an equal number of undergraduate students who are
majors in the department, with a faculty member and student serving as co-chairs. In the event that a
faculty or student member of the Academic Appeals Committee is a party in a grade appeal an
alternate previously selected shall serve in his or her place.
2. Selection of Academic Appeals Committee Members
-- Within the first week of the Fall semester,
each academic department shall elect at least three faculty members and one faculty member alternate
to serve on the Academic Appeals Committee for the academic year and designate three undergraduate
students and one undergraduate alternate enrolled in the academic department to serve on the
Academic Appeals Committee. Each academic department shall develop a standard process for
selecting student members for the Academic Appeals Committee. By the end of the first full week of
the Fall semester, the names of the faculty and student members of the Academic Appeals Committee
and alternates selected for each academic year shall then be forwarded to the dean’s office of the
college within which the department is located within by the end of the first full week of the Fall