Shippensburg University Graduate Grade Appeals Procedure
I. Introduction – A graduate student contemplating filing a grade appeal understands that consistent with the
practice of academic freedom faculty bear responsibility for assigning course grades in accordance with
professionally acceptable standards which have previously been communicated to students verbally or in
writing. At the same time, students have the right to ensure that grades are calculated accurately and
consistently, fairly and equitably, and without discrimination.
Note: Any grade appeals or grade change requests initiated on the basis of alleged academic dishonesty shall
be handled under the procedures set forth for academic dishonesty discussed later in this chapter.
II. Basis for Appealing a Final Course Grade – Graduate students may appeal a final course grade assigned to
them by an instructor based on one of four conditions:
A. The course instructor miscalculated the final course grade.
B. The course instructor committed an oversight in calculating the final course grade.
C. The course instructor acted in an arbitrary and/or capricious manner in assigning grades to the student,
including the final course grade to the student.
For an instructor to act in an arbitrary and/or capricious manner in assigning grades is defined as follows:
1. The instructor assigned a course grade to a student on some basis other than performance in the course;
2. The instructor assigned a course grade to a student by resorting to unreasonable standards different
from those which were applied to other students in that course; or
3. The instructor assigned a course grade to a student in a manner that represented a substantial,
unreasonable and unannounced departure from the instructor's previously articulated standards.
D. In assigning grades in the course to the student, the course instructor engaged in discrimination based on
factors that include but are not limited to: race, color, religion, creed, lifestyle, sexual orientation,
ancestry, national origin, age, union membership, gender, disability or political affiliation. This policy
extends to all military veterans as well.
III. Selection and Composition of the Academic Appeals Committee
1. Composition of the Academic Appeals Committee
– The Academic Appeals Committee of the
department or program shall consist of a minimum of three regular tenure track faculty members in the
department or program (excluding the Department Chairperson or Program Director) and an equal
number of students who are majors in the program, with a faculty member and student serving as co-
chairs. In the event that a faculty or student member of the Academic Appeals Committee is a party in
a grade appeal an alternate previously selected shall serve in his or her place.
2. Selection of Academic Appeals Committee Members
-- Within the first week of the Fall semester,
each academic department or program shall elect at least three faculty members and one faculty
member alternate to serve on the Academic Appeals Committee for the academic year and designate
three graduate students and one graduate alternate enrolled in the academic program to serve on the
Academic Appeals Committee. Each academic department or program shall develop a standard
process for selecting student members for the Academic Appeals Committee. By the end of the first
full week of the Fall semester, the names of the faculty and student members of the Academic Appeals
Committee and alternates selected for each academic year shall then be forwarded to the graduate
dean’s office by the end of the first full week of the Fall semester. In the event that a program lacks