Student Employee Performance Appraisal
Employee:
UWG Student ID #
Position Title:
Department:
Reviewer:
Title:
Date:
Review Period:
From (MM/DD/YYYY):______________________ To (MM/DD/YYYY)_________________________
Rating Scale: The following ratings must be used to ensure commonality of language and consistency on
overall ratings. Support comments are required to justify all ratings.
Significantly Exceeds Expectations: Work performance that is consistently superior and is seldom equaled in
overall contribution. This is reflected by accomplishments well beyond expectations. These conditions exist on a
continual rather than occasional basis. Provide justification in comment section.
Exceeds Requirements: Work performance exceeds specific job requirements in most areas of responsibility.
Accomplishments are above expected levels, and employee sustains uniformly high performance. Provide
justification in comments section.
Meets Requirements: Work performance that consistently completes job tasks as expected in terms of quality
and schedule. Performance can be described as solid and fully competent in all aspects of job content and
expectations. We highly recommend that you provide justification in comments section.
Needs Improvement: Work performance that sometimes fails to meet the standards for the tasks. Performance
is below minimum job requirements; improvement is essential. If an employee is given a “Needs Improvement”
rating in any area, we strongly suggest that you contact Student Employment.
Provide justification in comments section.
Unsatisfactory: Work performance fails to meet the standards for the tasks. Improvement is required within a
specified period to maintain employment. We strongly suggest that you contact Student Employment.
Provide justification in comments section.
After each section has been completed and the performance discussion has occurred, both the student employee
and supervisor must sign the form and should keep a copy for their records.
Use a current job description
Rate the employee’s level of performance, using the definitions above
Give an overall rating in the space provided, using the definitions above as a guide
Review with the employee each rating used to evaluate their work performance
I. Principal Responsibilities and Projects/Objectives (Required)
Evaluate performance relating to the primary responsibilities of the position and additional projects/objectives. Employee and
reviewer should discuss and agree upon what constitutes the major responsibilities and projects/objectives of the position before the
review is conducted. Please add rows to the form if needed. Include pertinent details, observations, examples and obstacles outside
the employee’s control in the comments section on the bottom. This section must be completed for all student employees.
Responsibility or Project/Objective
Review Rating
1.
COMMENTS:
2.
COMMENTS:
3.
COMMENTS:
4.
COMMENTS:
Significantly Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
5.
COMMENTS:
Significantly Exceed
Expectations
6.
COMMENTS:
7.
COMMENTS:
8.
COMMENTS:
II. Core Behaviors (Required)
Evaluate performance relating to the following core behavioral requirements and provide supporting details in Comments Section on
the bottom. This section must be completed for all student employees.
Universal Core Behaviors
Review Rating
Professionalism:
Reports to work properly attired and with good hygiene
Is knowledgeable about the job
Is knowledgeable about the department
Reports to work on time and as scheduled and works entire scheduled hours
COMMENTS:
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Communication:
Exhibits good listening and comprehension skills.
Effectively expresses oneself in all written and oral communications.
Keeps others adequately informed.
Responds with tact, diplomacy and composure when dealing with others.
COMMENTS:
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Teamwork and Collaboration:
Cooperates with others toward the achievement of common goals.
Seeks consensus and win-win solutions to problems and conflicts.
Actively contributes and fully participates in team initiatives.
Puts success of the team above own interests.
Builds and maintains constructive work relationships.
COMMENTS:
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Responsive to Change:
Supports and adapts to changes in the work environment.
Displays a proactive, problem-solving approach toward work.
Committed to life-long learning by continuously increasing skills, knowledge and effectiveness.
Actively seeks and initiates creative and innovative solutions.
Exercises sound, accurate and informed independent judgment when needed.
COMMENTS
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Quality Driven:
Results oriented and committed to quality through continuous process improvement.
Eliminates ineffective activities and closes performance gaps.
Shows initiative and coming up with ways to improve work processes and clarifying job functions
Anticipates and responds to customer needs.
Monitors own performance and actively seek feedback.
COMMENTS:
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Support of the Mission of University of West Georgia:
Values, supports and models institutional objectives including: service, collaboration, quality, personalism,
diversity and respect for all individuals.
Exhibits personal integrity, honesty, zeal and compassion.
Understands and supports the university’s efforts to serve all in need, especially those who are disadvantaged.
COMMENTS:
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Student Employee Comments:
Reviewer Comments:
Signatures:
___________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Student Employee (Indicates discussion of review) Date
____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Reviewing Manager Date