Student
Employee
Performance
Appraisal
Employee:
UWG Student ID
#
Position Title:
Department:
Reviewer:
Title:
Date:
Review Period:
From
(MM/DD/YYYY):
To
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Rating Scale: The following ratings must be used to ensure commonality of language and consistency on
overall ratings. Support comments are required to justify all ratings.
Significantly Exceeds Expectations: Work performance that is consistently superior and is seldom equaled in
overall contribution. This is reflected by accomplishments well beyond expectations. These conditions exist on a
continual rather than occasional basis. Provide justification in comment section.
Exceeds Requirements: Work performance exceeds specific job requirements in most areas of responsibility.
Accomplishments are above expected levels, and employee sustains uniformly high performance. Provide
justification in comments section.
Meets Requirements: Work performance that consistently completes job tasks as expected in terms of quality
and schedule. Performance can be described as solid and fully competent in all aspects of job content and
expectations. We highly recommend that you provide justification in comments section.
Needs Improvement: Work performance that sometimes fails to meet the standards for the tasks. Performance
is below minimum job requirements; improvement is essential. If an employee is given a “Needs Improvement”
rating in any area, we strongly suggest that you contact Student Employment.
Provide justification in comments section.
Unsatisfactory: Work performance fails to meet the standards for the tasks. Improvement is required within a
specified period to maintain employment. We strongly suggest that you contact Student Employment.
Provide justification in comments section.
After each section has been completed and the performance discussion has occurred, both the student employee
and supervisor must sign the form and should keep a copy for their records.
Use a current job description
Rate the employee’s level of performance, using the definitions above
Give an overall rating in the space provided, using the definitions above as a guide
Review with the employee each rating used to evaluate their work performance
Accountability- Understand job roles and accept personal responsibility.
Review Rating
COMMENTS:
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Communication- Effectively interact with others and share
information.
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
COMMENTS:
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Professionalism- Commitment to organizational and individual excellence.
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
COMMENTS:
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Teamwork- Collaborate and achieve common outcomes.
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
COMMENTS:
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Quality of Work- Completes work with accuracy, thoroughness, in a timely
manner, and maintains the ability to make reasonable decisions.
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
COMMENTS:
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Quantity of Work- Maintains a high level of productivity aligned to job
responsibilities, uses work time productively, and completes work in a timely
manner.
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
COMMENTS:
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Job Knowledge- Demonstrates competence with the knowledge, skills and
abilities needed to complete job responsibilities, possesses an
understanding of the job procedures & methods to produce unit outcomes.
COMMENTS:
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Achievement
of Outcomes-
Significantly
Exceed
Expectations
COMMENTS:
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Achievement of Outcomes- Demonstrates ability to contribute to the unit
outcomes, support others to achieve unit outcomes, engages in the work
environment to su
pp
ort continuous im
p
rovement.
Overall Rating:
Reviewer Comments:
Student Employee Comments:
Signatures:
Student Employee (Indicates discussion of review) Date
Reviewing Manager Date