640 C
HAPTER 21
Terms & Names
Terms & Names
MAIN IDEA
MAIN IDEA
One American's Story
Changing Ways
of Life
Prohibition
speakeasy
bootlegger
fundamentalism
Clarence Darrow
Scopes trial
Americans experienced
cultural conflicts as customs
and values changed in the
1920s.
The way in which different
groups react to change
continues to cause conflict
today.
WHY IT MATTERS NOW
WHY IT MATTERS NOW
As the 1920s dawned, social reformers who hoped to ban
alcohol—and the evils associated with it—rejoiced. The
Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution, banning the
manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol, took
effect in January of 1920. Billy Sunday, an evangelist who
preached against the evils of drinking, predicted a new age
of virtue and religion.
A PERSONAL
VOICE BILLY SUNDAY
The reign of tears is over! The slums will soon be only a memory.
We will turn our prisons into factories and our jails into storehouses and
corncribs. Men will walk upright now, women will smile and the children
will laugh. Hell will be forever for rent!
quoted in How Dry We Were: Prohibition Revisited
Sunday’s dream was not to be realized in the 1920s, as the law
proved unenforceable. The failure of Prohibition was a sign of cultural
conflicts most evident in the nation’s cities. Lured by jobs and by the
challenge and freedom that the city represented, millions of people
rode excitedly out of America’s rural past and into its urban future.
Rural and Urban Differences
America changed dramatically in the years before 1920, as was revealed in the
1920 census. According to figures that year, 51.2 percent of Americans lived in
communities with populations of 2,500 to more than 1 million. Between 1922
and 1929, migration to the cities accelerated, with nearly 2 million people leav-
ing farms and towns each year. “Cities were the place to be, not to get away
from,” said one historian. The agricultural world that millions of Americans left
behind was largely unchanged from the 19th century—that world was one of
small towns and farms bound together by conservative moral values and close
social relationships. Yet small-town attitudes began to lose their hold on the
American mind as the city rose to prominence.
1920s evangelist
Billy Sunday
p0640-45aspe-0621s1 10/17/02 9:02 AM Page 640
Page 1 of 6
THE NEW URBAN SCENE
At the beginning of the 1920s, New York, with a
population of 5.6 million people, topped the list of big cities. Next came Chicago,
with nearly 3 million, and Philadelphia, with nearly 2 million. Another 65 cities
claimed populations of 100,000 or more, and they grew more crowded by the day.
Life in these booming cities was far different from the slow-paced, inti-
mate life in America’s small towns. Chicago, for instance, was an indus-
trial powerhouse, home to native-born whites and African Americans,
immigrant Poles, Irish, Russians, Italians, Swedes, Arabs, French, and
Chinese. Each day, an estimated 300,000 workers, 150,000 cars and
buses, and 20,000 trolleys filled the pulsing downtown. At night people
crowded into ornate movie theaters and vaudeville houses offering live
variety shows.
For small-town migrants, adapting to the urban environment demanded
changes in thinking as well as in everyday living. The city was a world of compe-
tition and change. City dwellers read and argued about current scientific and
social ideas. They judged one another by accomplishment more often than by
background. City dwellers also tolerated drinking, gambling, and casual dating—
worldly behaviors considered shocking and sinful in small towns.
For all its color and challenge, though, the city could be impersonal and
frightening. Streets were filled with strangers, not friends and neighbors. Life was
fast-paced, not leisurely. The city demanded endurance, as a foreign visitor to
Chicago observed.
A PERSONAL VOICE WALTER L. GEORGE
It is not for nothing that the predominating color of Chicago is orange. It is as
if the city, in its taxicabs, in its shop fronts, in the wrappings of its parcels, chose
the color of flame that goes with the smoky black of its factories. It is not for
nothing that it has repelled the geometric street arrangement of New York and
substituted . . . great ways with names that a stranger must learn if he can. . . .
He is in a [crowded] city, and if he has business there, he tells himself, ‘If I
weaken I shan’t last long.’
—Hail Columbia!
How ya gonna
keep ’em down
on the farm,
after they’ve
seen Paree?
POPULAR SONG OF THE 1920s
History Through
History Through
SONG OF THE TOWERS
This mural by Aaron Douglas is part of a series
he painted inside the 135th Street Branch of
the New York Public Library to symbolize differ-
ent aspects of African-American life during the
1920s. In this panel, Song of the Towers, he
depicts figures before a city backdrop. As seen
here, much of Douglas’s style was influenced
by jazz music and geometric shapes.
SKILLBUILDER
Analyzing Visual Sources
1.
What is the focal point of this panel?
2.
What parts of this painting might be symbolic
of African Americans’ move north?
3.
How does Douglas represent new freedoms
in this mural? Support your answer with
examples.
SEE SKILLBUILDER HANDBOOK,
PAGE R23.
A
A. Answer Small
towns were
bound by tradi-
tional morals and
close ties of fam-
ily, friends, and
religion. Cities
offered varied
perspectives and
options because
of their large,
mixed popula-
tions; cultural
variety; and
greater toler-
ance of values
and ideas.
Skillbuilder
Answers
1. Possible
Answer: The
person in the
center with the
saxophone is
the focal point.
2. Possible
Answer: The fig-
ure on the right
is running
toward the big
city buildings.
3. Possible
Answer: The fig-
ure in the center
appears to be
joyous as he
raises his arms
upwards.
MAIN IDEA
MAIN IDEA
A
Contrasting
How did
small-town life and
city life differ?
p0640-45aspe-0621s1 10/17/02 9:02 AM Page 641
Page 2 of 6
A young woman demonstrates one of the means used to conceal alcohol—hiding it
in containers strapped to one’s legs.
In the city, lonely migrants from the country often ached
for home. Throughout the 1920s, Americans found them-
selves caught between rural and urban cultures—a tug that
pitted what seemed to be a safe, small-town world of close
ties, hard work, and strict morals against a big-city world of
anonymous crowds, moneymakers, and pleasure seekers.
THE PROHIBITION EXPERIMENT
One vigorous clash
between small-town and big-city Americans began in
earnest in January 1920, when the Eighteenth Amendment
went into effect. This amendment launched the era known
as Prohibition, during which the manufacture, sale, and
transportation of alcoholic beverages were legally prohibited.
Reformers had long considered liquor a prime cause of
corruption. They thought that too much drinking led to
crime, wife and child abuse, accidents on the job, and other
serious social problems. Support for Prohibition came largely
from the rural South and West, areas with large populations
of native-born Protestants. The church-affiliated Anti-Saloon
League had led the drive to pass the Prohibition amendment.
The Woman’s Christian Temperance Union, which consid-
ered drinking a sin, had helped push the measure through.
At first, saloons closed their doors, and arrests for
drunkenness declined. But in the aftermath of World War I,
many Americans were tired of making sacrifices; they want-
ed to enjoy life. Most immigrant groups did not consider
drinking a sin but a natural part of socializing, and they
resented government meddling.
Eventually, Prohibition’s fate was sealed by the government, which failed to
budget enough money to enforce the law. The Volstead Act established a
Prohibition Bureau in the Treasury Department in 1919, but the agency was
underfunded. The job of enforcement involved patrolling 18,700 miles
of coastline as well as inland borders, tracking down illegal stills (equip-
ment for distilling liquor), monitoring highways for truckloads of
illegal alcohol, and overseeing all the industries that legally used
alcohol to be sure none was siphoned off for illegal purposes. The
task fell to approximately 1,500 poorly paid federal agents and
local police—clearly an impossible job.
SPEAKEASIES AND BOOTLEGGERS
To obtain liquor ille-
gally, drinkers went underground to hidden saloons and
nightclubs known as speakeasies—so called because when
inside, one spoke quietly, or “easily,” to avoid detection.
Speakeasies could be found everywhere—in penthouses, cel-
lars, office buildings, rooming houses, tenements, hardware
stores, and tearooms. To be admitted to a speakeasy, one had to
present a card or use a password. Inside, one would find a mix of
fashionable middle-class and upper-middle-class men and
women.
Before long, people grew bolder in getting around the law.
They learned to distill alcohol and built their own stills. Since alco-
hol was allowed for medicinal and religious purposes, prescriptions
642 C
HAPTER 21
DIFFICULT
DIFFICULT
D
E
C
I
S
I
O
N
S
D
E
C
I
S
I
O
N
S
TO PROHIBIT
ALCOHOL OR NOT?
The question of whether to out-
law alcohol divided Americans.
Many believed the government
should make alcohol illegal to
protect the public, while others
believed it was a personal deci-
sion, and not morally wrong.
1. Examine the pros and cons of
each position. Which do you
agree with? What other fac-
tors, if any, do you think
would influence your position?
2. If you had been a legislator
asked to vote for the
Eighteenth Amendment, what
would you have said? Explain.
3. What happens when the gov-
ernment legislates moral val-
ues? Give contemporary
examples to support your
answer.
p0640-45aspe-0621s1 10/17/02 9:02 AM Page 642
Page 3 of 6
for alcohol and sales of sacramental wine (intended for
church services) skyrocketed. People also bought liquor
from bootleggers (named for a smuggler’s practice of
carrying liquor in the legs of boots), who smuggled it in
from Canada, Cuba, and the West Indies. “The business of
evading [the law] and making a mock of it has ceased to
wear any aspects of crime and has become a sort of
national sport,” wrote the journalist H. L. Mencken.
ORGANIZED CRIME
Prohibition not only generated dis-
respect for the law, it also contributed to organized crime in
nearly every major city. Chicago became notorious as the
home of Al Capone, a gangster whose bootlegging empire
netted over $60 million a year. Capone took control of the
Chicago liquor business by killing off his competition.
During the 1920s, headlines reported 522 bloody gang
killings and made the image of flashy Al Capone part of the
folklore of the period. In 1940, the writer Herbert Asbury
recalled the Capone era in Chicago.
A PERSONAL VOICE HERBERT ASBURY
The famous seven-ton armored car, with the pudgy gang-
ster lolling on silken cushions in its darkened recesses, a
big cigar in his fat face, and a $50,000 diamond ring blaz-
ing from his left hand, was one of the sights of the city; the
average tourist felt that his trip to Chicago was a failure
unless it included a view of Capone out for a spin. The
mere whisper: ‘Here comes Al,’ was sufficient to stop traf-
fic and to set thousands of curious citizens craning their
necks along the curbing.
Gem of the Prairie
By the mid-1920s, only 19 percent of Americans sup-
ported Prohibition. The rest, who wanted the amendment
changed or repealed, believed that Prohibition caused
worse effects than the initial problem. Rural Protestant
Americans, however, defended a law that they felt strengthened moral values. The
Eighteenth Amendment remained in force until 1933, when it was repealed by
the Twenty-first Amendment.
AL CAPONE
By age 26, Al Capone headed a
criminal empire in Chicago, which
he controlled through the use of
bribes and violence. From 1925 to
1931, Capone bootlegged whiskey
from Canada, operated illegal
breweries in Chicago, and ran a
network of 10,000 speakeasies.
In 1927, the “Big Fellow,” as he
liked to be called, was worth an
estimated $100 million.
The end came quickly for
Capone, though. In 1931, the
gangster chief was arrested for
tax evasion and went to jail.
That was the only crime of which
the authorities were ever able
to convict him. Capone was later
released from jail, but he died
several years later at age 48.
The Roaring Life of the 1920s 643
B
S
P
O
T
L
I
G
H
T
S
P
O
T
L
I
G
H
T
HISTORICAL
HISTORICAL
C
B. Possible
Answers The
consumption of
alcohol was a
traditional part
of many cul-
tures; the gov-
ernment failed
to provide suffi-
cient staff and
resources to
enforce the law;
the means of
manufacturing,
selling, and
transporting
liquor were
many and could
easily be con-
cealed.
C. Answer
Criminals broke
the law by
smuggling, as
well as by mak-
ing alcohol and
selling it for
profit.
MAIN IDEA
MAIN IDEA
B
Developing
Historical
Perspective
Why do you
think the
Eighteenth
Amendment failed
to eliminate
alcohol
consumption?
MAIN IDEA
MAIN IDEA
C
Analyzing
Effects
How did
criminals take
advantage of
Prohibition?
Prohibition, 1920–1933
Causes
•Various religious groups thought drinking
alcohol was sinful.
Reformers believed that the government
should protect the public’s health.
Reformers believed that alcohol led to
crime, wife and child abuse, and acci-
dents on the job.
• During World War I, native-born Americans
developed a hostility to German-American
brewers and toward other immigrant
groups that used alcohol.
Effects
Consumption of alcohol declined.
Disrespect for the law developed.
An increase in lawlessness, such
as smuggling and bootlegging, was
evident.
Criminals found a new source of
income.
•Organized crime grew.
p0640-45aspe-0621s1 10/17/02 9:02 AM Page 643
Page 4 of 6
Science and Religion Clash
Another bitter controversy highlighted the growing
rift between traditional and modern ideas during
the 1920s. This battle raged between fundamentalist reli-
gious groups and secular thinkers over the truths of science.
AMERICAN FUNDAMENTALISM
The Protestant movement
grounded in a literal, or nonsymbolic, interpretation of the
Bible was known as fundamentalism. Fundamentalists
were skeptical of scientific knowledge; they argued that all
important knowledge could be found in the Bible. They believed
that the Bible was inspired by God, and that therefore its stories in
all their details were true.
Their beliefs led fundamentalists to reject the theory of evolu-
tion advanced by Charles Darwin in the 19th century—a theory
stating that plant and animal species had developed and changed
over millions of years. The claim they found most unbelievable
was that humans had evolved from apes. They pointed instead to
the Bible’s account of creation, in which God made the world and
all its life forms, including humans, in six days.
Fundamentalism expressed itself in several ways. In the South
and West, preachers led religious revivals based on the authority of
the Scriptures. One of the most powerful revivalists was Billy
Sunday, a baseball player turned preacher who staged emotional meetings across the
South. In Los Angeles, Aimee Semple McPherson, a theatrical woman who dressed
in flowing white satin robes, used Hollywood showmanship to preach the word to
homesick Midwestern migrants and devoted followers of her radio broadcasts. In the
1920s, fundamentalism gained followers who began to call for laws prohibiting the
teaching of evolution.
THE SCOPES TRIAL
In March 1925, Tennessee passed the
nation’s first law that made it a crime to teach evolution.
Immediately, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
promised to defend any teacher who would challenge the
law. John T. Scopes, a young biology teacher in Dayton,
Tennessee, accepted the challenge. In his biology class,
Scopes read this passage from Civic Biology: “We have now
learned that animal forms may be arranged so as to begin
with the simple one-celled forms and culminate with a
group which includes man himself.” Scopes was promptly
arrested, and his trial was set for July.
The ACLU hired Clarence Darrow, the most famous
trial lawyer of the day, to defend Scopes. William Jennings
Bryan, three-time Democratic candidate for president and a
devout fundamentalist, served as a special prosecutor. There
was no real question of guilt or innocence: Scopes was hon-
est about his action. The Scopes trial was a fight over evo-
lution and the role of science and religion in public schools
and in American society.
The trial opened on July 10, 1925, and almost overnight
became a national sensation. Darrow called Bryan as an
expert on the Bible—the contest that everyone had been
waiting for. To handle the throngs of Bryan supporters,
Judge Raulston moved the court outside, to a platform built
under the maple trees. There, before a crowd of several
644 C
HAPTER 21
The evangelist Aimee
Semple McPherson
in 1922
N
O
W
N
O
W
T
H
E
N
T
H
E
N
EVOLUTION, CREATIONISM,
AND EDUCATION
There is still great controversy
today over the teaching of evolu-
tion in the public schools. Some
people believe that creation theo-
ry should be taught as a theory of
the origin of life, along with evolu-
tion. As recently as 1999, the
Kansas State School Board voted
to eliminate the teaching of evolu-
tion from the curriculum.
The issue of what should be
taught about the origin of life—
and who should decide this
issue—continues to stir up
debate. Some have suggested
that science and religion are not
necessarily incompatible. They
believe that a theory of the origin
of life can accommodate both the
scientific theory of evolution and
religious beliefs.
D
Vocabulary
culminate:
to come to
completion; end
D. Answer
Fundamentalists
believed that all
important
knowledge
could be found
in the Bible and
that what was in
the Bible was
true. They
rejected
Darwin’s theory
of evolution.
MAIN IDEA
MAIN IDEA
D
Summarizing
Summarize
the beliefs of
fundamentalism.
p0640-45aspe-0621s1 10/17/02 9:02 AM Page 644
Page 5 of 6
E
thousand, Darrow relentlessly questioned Bryan about
his beliefs. Bryan stood firm, a smile on his face.
A PERSONAL VOICE
CLARENCE DARROW
AND WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYAN
Mr. Darrow—
You claim that everything in the
Bible should be literally interpreted?
Mr. Bryan— I believe everything in the Bible should
be accepted as it is given there. Some of the Bible
is given illustratively. For instance: ‘Ye are the salt of
the earth.’ I would not insist that man was actually
salt, or that he had flesh of salt, but it is used in the
sense of salt as saving God’s people.
—quoted in Bryan and Darrow at Dayton
Darrow asked Bryan if he agreed with Bishop
James Ussher’s calculation that, according to the
Bible, Creation happened in 4004
B.C. Had every liv-
ing thing on earth appeared since that time? Did
Bryan know that ancient civilizations had thrived
before 4004
B.C.? Did he know the age of the earth?
Bryan grew edgy but stuck to his guns. Finally, Darrow asked Bryan, “Do you
think the earth was made in six days?” Bryan answered, “Not six days of 24
hours.” People sitting on the lawn gasped.
With this answer, Bryan admitted that the Bible might be interpreted in
different ways. But in spite of this admission, Scopes was found guilty and
fined $100. The Tennessee Supreme Court later changed the verdict on a tech-
nicality, but the law outlawing the teaching of evolution remained in effect.
This clash over evolution, the Prohibition experiment, and the emerging
urban scene all were evidence of the changes and conflicts occurring during the
1920s. During that period, women also experienced conflict as they redefined
their roles and pursued new lifestyles.
The Roaring Life of the 1920s 645
A 1925 newspaper
cartoon portrays
Bryan (left) and
Darrow (right) at the
close of the Scopes
"monkey" trial on the
teaching of evolution,
so-called because of
a theory of evolution
that humans evolved
from apes.
MAIN IDEA
2. TAKING NOTES
Create two diagrams like the one
below. Show how government
attempted to deal with (a) problems
thought to stem from alcohol use
and (b) the teaching of evolution.
Was the legislation effective?
Explain.
CRITICAL THINKING
3. ANALYZING ISSUES
How might the overall atmosphere
of the 1920s have contributed to
the failure of Prohibition?
4. ANALYZING CAUSES
Why do you think organized crime
spread so quickly through the cities
during the 1920s? Explain your
answer.
5. EVALUATING
Do you think the passage of the
Volstead Act and the ruling in the
Scopes trial represented genuine
triumphs for traditional values?
Think About:
changes in urban life in the
1920s
the effects of Prohibition
the legacy of the Scopes trial
Issue
Legislation
Outcome
E. Answer
Fundamentalists
believed that
God created the
world in six
days, whereas
evolutionists
argued that
modern species
developed from
earlier forms of
life over millions
of years.
MAIN IDEA
MAIN IDEA
E
Analyzing
Issues
What was the
conflict between
fundamentalists
and those who
accepted
evolution?
Prohibition
speakeasy
bootlegger
fundamentalism
Clarence Darrow
Scopes trial
1. TERMS & NAMES For each term or name, write a sentence explaining its significance.
p0640-45aspe-0621s1 10/17/02 9:02 AM Page 645
Page 6 of 6