1
Section VI.F.: Student Discipline Procedures for Non-Academic Misconduct
These procedures supplement and clarify Section VI.F of the Lone Star College System
District Policy Manual (“Policy Manual”) last revised by the Board of Trustees on March 3,
2016setting out the College’s policies regarding student discipline for non-academic
misconduct.
These procedures are meant to be read in conjunction with Section VI.F. of the Policy Manual,
and the Policy Manual controls when a conflict arises between it and the procedures below.
All terms defined in Section VI.F.1.02. of the Policy Manual shall also be defined terms for
purposes of these procedures. The Board of Trustees has specifically delegated the creation
and adoption of these procedures to the Office of the General Counsel, subject to the
Chancellor’s approval. Chancellor’s procedures were originally posted on November 16,
2016 following a notice and comment period. These procedures when then revised on
September 18, 2018, following another notice and comment period. The notice and comment
period for this procedure update was open to the public online from October 30, 2018 to
November 13, 2018. Forms VI.F.1. through VI.F.7. referenced herein are included in the
appendix to these procedures.
1. Scope of Procedures. The procedures below are intended to apply to all discipline of
College students for non-academic misconduct covered in Section VI.F. of the Policy Manual.
These procedures are not intended to apply to sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual
violence, or sexual discrimination committed by studentsthese types of misconduct are
handled under separate policies and procedures. Nor are these procedures intended to apply
to academic misconduct, which is handled under separate policies and procedures. Non-
academic misconduct usually only relates to students conduct on College premises, but non-
academic misconduct can also include conduct outside of College premises if it creates or
foreseeably could create harmful effects on College premises.
2. Designation of Chief Conduct Officer. Every LSC college president must designate
one of his or her vice-presidents to serve as Chief Conduct Officer for that college and for the
centers under that college’s administrative supervision. Each LSC college president shall
inform the Vice Chancellor of Student Success and General Counsel whenever the identity of
the Chief Conduct Officer changes. The Office of the General Counsel shall keep the current
list of Chief Conduct Officers at www.lonestar.edu/ChiefConductOfficers. Each Chief Conduct
Officer has primary responsibility for student discipline for non-academic misconduct
occurring on, or having harmful effects on, the premises of the Chief Conduct Officer’s college
and LSC centers under that college’s administrative supervision. This includes responsibility
for non-academic misconduct by LSC-Online students whose home campus is the Chief
Conduct Officer’s college.
3. Designation and Rotation of Discipline Committees. Each college president shall
designate five faculty members, five staff members, and five students to serve in the college’s
Discipline Committee pool to review suspensions and expulsions imposed by other colleges.
Each Discipline Committee from that college shall consist of three of the designated faculty
2
and/or staff members (including at least one staff member and one faculty member) and two
of the designated students from the college’s Discipline Committee pool. When a college
president receives notice that its Discipline Committee is needed for a hearing, the college
president or designee shall email three of the faculty and/or staff and two of the students
from the Discipline Committee pool and require them to serve as the Discipline Committee
for the hearing. If any of the contacted individuals legitimately cannot participate because of
a conflict of interest or an important scheduling conflict, the college president or designee
shall contact as many of the other designated individuals as necessary to create a full
Discipline Committee. Designated individuals may not be compelled to serve on any
particular Discipline Committee, but the college president may designate additional faculty
and/or staff members and students as potential Discipline Committee members if needed.
The college president shall select one of the Discipline Committee’s faculty or staff members
to serve as the Discipline Committee’s Chair for the scheduled hearing.
A Discipline Committee may not review suspensions and expulsions imposed by its
college’s Chief Conduct Officer. When a Discipline Committee hearing is required under these
procedures, the Chief Conduct Officer shall contact the Office of the General Counsel to ask
which college’s Discipline Committee is next in the rotation. The colleges shall rotate
responsibility to provide a Discipline Committee in this order:
1. Lone Star CollegeNorth Harris
2. Lone Star CollegeKingwood
3. Lone Star CollegeTomball
4. Lone Star CollegeMontgomery
5. Lone Star CollegeCyFair
6. Lone Star CollegeUniversity Park
4. Reports of Non-Academic Misconduct. When non-academic misconduct is serious,
or when minor non-academic misconduct cannot be resolved informally, anyone with
knowledge of a College student’s non-academic misconduct may report it to the appropriate
Chief Conduct Officer. Reports must be submitted in writing. Reporters may use Form VI.F.1.
or any other written format that substantially conveys the same information as a completed
Form VI.F.1. If a Form VI.F.1. is submitted to a College employee who is not the appropriate
Chief Conduct Officer, that employee shall promptly forward the report to the appropriate
Chief Conduct Officer.
5. Effective Delivery. Unless otherwise specified, any document under these
procedures may be delivered in person or by emailing the document to the recipient’s
designated College email address. All members of the College community must keep current
and regularly monitor their designated College email addresses.
3
For purposes of these procedures, working days end at 5:00 p.m. central time.
Working days are all days other than Saturdays, Sundays, and any days the College is closed
according to its official calendar or at the direction of the Chancellor or his designee. In
calculating deadlines under these procedures, the working day on which an event occurs is
“day zero,” and the following working day is “day one.” If an event occurs on a day which is
not a working day, then the next working day is “day zero.” Any deadlines under these
procedures may be extended with the recipient’s written consent.
6. Investigation. After receiving a report of non-academic misconduct, a Chief Conduct
Officer shall investigate whether any students have committed non-academic misconduct.
The Chief Conduct Officer may delegate investigative duties to other administrative officials,
but investigative duties may not be sub-delegated. Investigative duties may include, but are
not limited to, some or all of the following:
Reviewing the report of non-academic misconduct;
Interviewing any person with first-hand knowledge of facts related to the reported
non-academic misconduct;
Reviewing any available evidence of the reported non-academic misconduct,
including correspondence, documentation, police reports, photographs, physical
evidence, and any other available evidence; and
Gathering any facts relevant to the reported non-academic misconduct.
The time and energy dedicated to investigations of non-academic misconduct should
be appropriate to the seriousness of the alleged misconduct and the degree of difficulty in
determining the facts of the reported incident(s). Investigations have no minimum length;
for example, misconduct witnessed personally by the Chief Conduct Officer may require
virtually no additional investigation. Each investigation must conclude within ten working
days of when the Chief Conduct Officer receives the report of non-academic misconduct.
7. Initial Decision. Within ten working days of the date on which the Chief Conduct
Officer receives a report of non-academic misconduct, the Chief Conduct Officer shall decide
whether the reported non-academic misconduct and any other non-academic misconduct
uncovered during the investigation more likely than not occurred. The Chief Conduct Officer
shall use Form VI.F.2. to memorialize his or her decision.
If the Chief Conduct Officer decides that the reported non-academic misconduct
probably did not occur, then the decision shall be included with the report and investigation
file, and the matter shall be included in the Chief Conduct Officer’s files and not be included
in any student’s College file. If the Chief Conduct Officer decides that the reported non-
academic misconduct (and any other non-academic misconduct uncovered by the
investigation) probably did occur, then the decision must also impose an appropriate
sanction. The Chief Conduct Officer shall send a copy of the decision to the student(s) decided
to have engaged in non-academic misconduct (each such student to be referred to herein as
4
“Respondent”) within ten working days of the date on which the Chief Conduct Officer
received the report of non-academic misconduct. A copy of the decision will be placed in the
Respondent’s College file.
If the decision imposes suspension or expulsion, the decision shall be accompanied
by Section VI.F. of the Policy Manual, these procedures and forms, and the following
statement:
“If you have been suspended or expelled, then you have the right to request a
hearing before a Discipline Committee by replying to this email with your
request within five working days. If you do not request a hearing, this decision
will become final at 5:00 p.m. central time on [date of 5th working day after the
decision is sent].”
A decision imposing suspension or expulsion must be sent to the appropriate college
president at the same time it is sent to the Respondent. A suspension or expulsion usually
may not take effect until a decision is final. Withdrawal of consent to be on College property
may only last for up to 14 calendar days. A decision imposing withdrawal of consent triggers
procedures under the Texas Education Code Chapter 51. If withdrawal of consent to be on
College property is imposed then the Chief Conduct Officer shall notify the Office of the
General Counsel immediately.
8. Discipline Committee Hearing. If a Respondent entitled to a hearing before the
Discipline Committee timely requests a hearing, the Chief Conduct Officer shall schedule a
Discipline Committee hearing to take place within the next 14 working days and shall send
at least 7 working days’ noticeand more if possibleto the Respondent, to the college
president over the college to provide the Discipline Committee for the hearing, to the Chief
Conduct Officer’s college president, and to the Office of the General Counsel. Form VI.F.3.
should generally be used for these notices, but another written communication containing
equivalent information may be used instead of Form VI.F.3. A joint hearing may be scheduled
for Respondents initially found to have participated in the same incident(s) of non-academic
misconduct, and references in this Section VI.F.8. to one Respondent shall also refer to
multiple Respondents if applicable.
Discipline Committee hearings shall take place at the Discipline Committee’s college
in a room chosen by the Discipline Committee Chair. If possible, a Discipline Committee
hearing lasts no more than one day, but a hearing may continue onto a subsequent day if the
Discipline Committee believes it necessary. All participants in the hearing should strive to
arrive at the hearing at least 15 minutes early. All hearing participants should attend in
person, but the Discipline Committee Chair may allow any hearing participant(s) to
participate by telephone or similar contemporaneous communication technology. The
College does not reimburse travel expenses related to participation in a Discipline
Committee hearing.
5
The Respondent may personally appear at the hearing, but if a Respondent elects not
to appear, he or she must appear through a representative who may be an attorney. The
College will appear through the Chief Conduct Officer who reached the decision at issue in
the hearing, and an attorney from the Office of the General Counsel may also appear on behalf
of the College. Failure to appear, either personally or through a representative, will not
prevent the Discipline Committee Chair from convening and conducting the hearing. At least
four members of the Discipline Committee must be present at all times during the hearing. A
member of the Lone Star College Police Department shall also be present during the hearing.
The Discipline Committee Chair shall preside over, conduct, and adjourn the hearing.
After convening the hearing and asking whether the College and the Respondent are present,
the Chair shall read aloud the following paragraph, which governs the hearing’s procedure:
“We are here to determine whether [Respondent] engaged in non-academic
misconduct and should be [suspended/expelled] from the College. The College has
initially determined that [Respondent] engaged in the following non-academic
misconduct: [Read Decision and Investigation Narrative from Form VI.F.2.]. During
the hearing, a party may speak personally or have a representative speak for the
party. A party’s representative may bebut need not bean attorney. At each stage
of this hearing, the College will go first. Each party will have an opportunity to give an
opening statement, then each party will have an opportunity to present its case, then
each party will have an opportunity to give a closing statement. Any party may
present witnesses or evidence while presenting its case. The Texas and Federal Rules
of Evidence will not apply to the hearing. [Respondent] may not be questioned during
the hearing unless [Respondent] testifies as a witness during the presentation of
[Respondent’s] case. [Respondent] is not obligated to present a case. Any party may
question another party’s witnesses unless a legally recognized exception to this right
exists. Any member of this Discipline Committee may question any witness. All
evidence, questions, and statements should be relevant to the conduct at issue in this
hearing. The Chair determines whether something is relevant. The Chair will manage
time to ensure that each party has sufficient time to present its case. After closing
statements, this hearing will end and the Discipline Committee will deliberate and
reach a decision based on the evidence presented. The Discipline Committee will issue
a decision within five working days after this hearing ends and inform [Respondent]
of that decision within seven working days after this hearing ends.”
After the hearing, the Discipline Committee shall dismiss the parties and consider the
evidence and statements presented. The Discipline Committee shall evaluate whether non-
academic misconduct occurred on a more-likely-than-not standard; that is, if at least three
members of the Discipline Committee believe that the evidence shows that the Respondent
probably engaged in non-academic misconduct, then it shall find that the Respondent did
engage in such non-academic misconduct, and vice-versa. If it finds that the Respondent
engaged in non-academic misconduct, the Discipline Committee shall recommend sanctions.
The Discipline Committee’s sanction recommendations do not bind College officials, but if
6
the Discipline Committee finds that a Respondent did not engage in non-academic
misconduct, College officials may not suspend or expel that Respondent for the reported non-
academic misconduct unless the Discipline Committee’s decision is reversed on appeal. The
Chief Conduct officer may adhere to the sanction initially imposed or may adopt the
sanctions recommended by the Discipline Committee.
The Discipline Committee shall memorialize its decision using Form VI.F.4. Within
five working days after the hearing ends, the Vice President of Student Services or
Enrollment Management of the college where the hearing occurred shall simultaneously
email the Discipline Committee’s decision, including Form VI.F.4., to the relevant Chief
Conduct Officer, to the Chief Conduct Officer’s college president, and to the Office of the
General Counsel. Within seven working days after the hearing ends, the Discipline
Committee’s Chair shall email the Discipline Committee’s decision, including Form VI.F.4., to
the Respondent. A copy of the Discipline Committee’s decision shall be included in the
Respondent’s College file. Within five working days of the Respondent receiving the
Discipline Committee’s decision, the College or a Respondent may appeal the decision; if not
timely appealed, the decision is final.
9. Appeal. The College, through the relevant Chief Conduct Officer, or a Respondent,
personally or through a representative, may appeal the Discipline Committee’s decision by
submitting Form VI.F.5. and a copy of the Discipline Committee’s decision (Form VI.F.4.) to
the Office of the Vice Chancellor of Student Success within five working days of when the
parties received the Discipline Committee’s decision. Form VI.F.5. must state why the
appealing party believes the Discipline Committee’s decision should be modified or reversed.
The Vice Chancellor of Student Success shall review Form VI.F.5. and the Discipline
Committee’s decision and may decide to discuss the matter with the Chief Conduct Officer
and the Respondent. If the Vice Chancellor of Student Success chooses to discuss the matter
with these individuals, he or she should do so with both of them present, either in person or
by conference call. Within five working days of receiving the appeal, the Vice Chancellor of
Student Success shall issue a decision using Form VI.F.6., which may affirm, reverse, or
modify the Discipline Committee’s decision. This decision must be sent simultaneously to the
Respondent, to the relevant Chief Conduct Officer, to the Chief Conduct Officer’s college
president, and to the Office of the General Counsel. In reaching a decision, the Vice Chancellor
of Student Success has complete discretion over an appealed matter’s outcome, and the Vice
Chancellor of Student Success’s decision is final. A copy of the Vice Chancellor of Student
Success’s decision shall be included in the Respondent’s College file.
10. Periods of Disruption. A suspension or expulsion usually may not take effect until a
decision is final. A decision is not final until the opportunity for the Respondent to appeal has
passed without an appeal or after all appeals have been exhausted. However, during periods
of disruption, the procedures in Chapter 51, Subchapter E-1 of the Texas Education Code
apply. A college president is the chief administrative officer under Subchapter E-1.
Subchapter E-1 is reproduced in the appendix to these procedures.
APPENDIX & FORMS
A-1
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Did Respondent’s
conduct cause a
period of
disruption?
2
Continue with
Sample Flow
Chart: Periods
of Disruption
Procedures.
Yes
Yes or No
Sample Flow Chart: Student Discipline for Non-Academic Misconduct Procedures
12
1
In this chart, “days” refers to the number
of “working days” as these procedures define that term.
2
Tex. Educ. Code § 51.231 defines “period of disruption.”
Non-academic
misconduct reported
(Form VI.F.1.).
Chief Conduct Officer
investigates reported
misconduct for up to
10 days.
1
Chief Conduct Officer
issues decision
(Form VI.F.2.).
Non-
academic
misconduct?
Matter
closed.
Decision sent to Respondent within 10 days
of initial report of non-academic misconduct.
Suspension
or Expulsion
Imposed?
Chief Conduct
Officer’s decision
is final.
College president copied on decision;
Respondent given policies and procedures
and informed of right to hearing.
Has Respondent
requested a
hearing within 5
days?
Chief Conduct Officer schedules the Discipline Committee
hearing to take place within 14 days of the request for a
hearing and sends notices of Discipline Committee hearing
(Form VI.F.3.) at least 7 days before hearing date.
Chief Conduct Officer contacts the
college president of the next
Discipline Committee on rotation.
Discipline Committee holds hearing, decides, and informs Chief Conduct Officer,
the Chief Conduct Officer’s college president, and the Office of the General
Counsel of the decision within 5 days of the hearing date. Discipline Committee
informs Respondent of decision within 7 days of the hearing date (Form VI.F.4).
Non-
Academic
Misconduct?
Sanction
determined by
CCO. Respondent
appeals decision
within 5 days?
(Form VI.F.5)
Chief Conduct
Officer appeals
Discipline
Committee’s
Decision within 5
days? (Form VI.F.5.)
Vice Chancellor of Student Success
reviews the matter and issues a final
decision within 5 days of the appeal
(Form VI.F.6.).
Chief Conduct
Officer’s
sanction final.
College and
Respondent
may agree on
discipline at
any time
(Form VI.F.7.).
No
A-2
Sample Flow Chart: Periods of Disruption Procedures
12
1
The process in this chart runs concurrently with the process shown in Sample Flow Chart: Student Discipline for Non-Academic Misconduct Procedures
except to the extent that the Texas Education Code requires additional procedures.
2
In this chart, “days” refers to “calendar days.”
LSCPD or delegated college official notifies
Respondent in writing that the College has
withdrawn its consent for Respondent to
remain on campus for a maximum of 14 days.
2
LSCPD or delegated college official submits the
notice to the college president within 24 hours
of notifying Respondent.
The withdrawal is void. The
College reinstates consent for
Respondent’s consent to
remain on campus.
The withdrawal stands,
pending a hearing or the
expiration of the
withdrawal of consent.
College president
approves the
withdrawal of
consent?
Yes
No
Respondent requests a
hearing during the 14-
day period by
contacting the president
or a designee?
The withdrawal stands for a maximum
of 14 days from the date of the initial
withdrawal of consent or conclusion of
the administrative process.
No
Yes
The Chief Conduct Officer
schedules a hearing to take
place within 3 days of the
request.
The hearing occurs before the Chief
Conduct Officer or a designee, following
the requirements in Tex. Educ. Code
§ 51.243.
Does the decision of
the Chief Conduct
Officer or the designee
conclude that consent
was appropriately
withdrawn?
No
The Chief Conduct Officer or a designee
issues a decision regarding the consent
withdrawal within a reasonable time
Did
Respondent
appeal to the
president?
The president reviews
Respondent’s appeal
and issues a decision
within a reasonable
time period.
No
Does the
president agree
that consent was
appropriately
withdrawn?
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
The withdrawal stands,
pending an appeal to
the president or
conclusion of the
administrative process.
A-3
Texas Education Code, Chapter 51
Subchapter E-1. Maintaining Campus Order During Periods of Disruption
Sec. 51.231. Definition of Periods of Disruption.
For purposes of this subchapter a period of disruption is any period in which it reasonably
appears that there is a threat of destruction to institutional property, injury to human life
on the campus or facility, or a threat of willful disruption of the orderly operation of the
campus or facility.
Sec. 51.232. Identification of Persons on Campus.
(a) During periods of disruption, as determined by the chief administrative officer of a
state-supported institution of higher education, the chief administrative officer, or an
officer or employee of the institution designated by him to maintain order on the campus
or facility of the institution, may require that any person on the campus or facility present
evidence of his identification, or if the person is a student or employee of the institution,
his student or employee official institutional identification card, or other evidence of his
relationship with the institution.
(b) If any person refuses or fails upon request to present evidence of his identification, or
if the person is a student or employee of the institution, his student or employee official
identification card, or other evidence of his relationship with the institution, and if it
reasonably appears that the person has no legitimate reason to be on the campus or facility,
the person may be ejected from the campus or facility.
Sec. 51.233. Withdrawal of Consent to Remain on Campus.
(a) During periods of disruption, the chief administrative officer of a campus or other
facility of a state-supported institution of higher education, or an officer or employee of the
institution designated by him to maintain order on the campus or facility, may notify a
person that consent to remain on the campus or facility under the control of the chief
administrative officer has been withdrawn whenever there is reasonable cause to believe
that the person has willfully disrupted the orderly operation of the campus or facility and
that his presence on the campus or facility will constitute a substantial and material threat
to the orderly operation of the campus or facility.
(b) In no case shall consent be withdrawn for longer than 14 days from the date on which
consent was initially withdrawn.
(c) Notification shall be in accordance with procedures set out in Section 51.234 of this
code.
Sec. 51.234. Notice of Withdrawal of Consent.
When the chief administrative officer of a campus or other facility of a state-supported
institution of higher education, or an officer or employee of the institution designated by
A-4
him to maintain order on the campus or facility, decides to withdraw consent for any
person to remain on the campus or facility, he shall notify that person in writing that
consent to remain is withdrawn. The written notice must contain all of the following:
(1) that consent to remain on the campus has been withdrawn and the number of days for
which consent has been withdrawn, not to exceed 14;
(2) the name and job title of the person withdrawing consent, along with an address where
the person withdrawing consent can be contacted during regular working hours;
(3) a brief statement of the activity or activities resulting in the withdrawal of consent;
and
(4) notification that the person from whom consent has been withdrawn is entitled to a
hearing on the withdrawal not later than three days from the date of receipt by the chief
administrative officer of a request for a hearing.
Sec. 51.235. Report to Chief Administrative Officer.
Whenever consent is withdrawn by any authorized officer or employee other than the chief
administrative officer, the officer or employee shall submit a written report to the chief
administrative officer within 24 hours, unless the authorized officer or employee has
reinstated consent for the person to remain on the campus. The report must contain all of
the following:
(1) the description of the person from whom consent was withdrawn, including, if
available, the person's name, address, and phone number; and
(2) a statement of the facts giving rise to the withdrawal of consent.
Sec. 51.236. Confirmation of Withdrawal of Consent.
(a) If the chief administrative officer or, in his absence, a person designated by him for this
purpose, upon reviewing the written report described in Section 51.235, finds that there
was reasonable cause to believe that the person has willfully disrupted the orderly
operation of the campus or facility, and that his presence on the campus or facility will
constitute a substantial and material threat to the orderly operation of the campus or
facility, he may enter written confirmation upon the report of the action taken by the officer
or employee.
(b) If the chief administrative officer, or in his absence, the person designated by him, does
not confirm the action of the officer or employee within 24 hours after the time that consent
was withdrawn, the action of the officer or employee shall be deemed void and of no force
or effect, except that any arrest made during the period shall not for this reason be deemed
not to have been made for probable cause.
A-5
Sec. 51.237. Request for Hearing.
(a) A person from whom consent has been withdrawn may submit a written request for a
hearing on the withdrawal to the chief administrative officer within the 14-day period. The
written request must state the address to which notice of hearing is to be sent. The chief
administrative officer shall grant a hearing not later than three days from the date of
receipt of the request and shall immediately mail a written notice of the time, place, and
date of the hearing to the person.
(b) The hearing shall be held before a duly designated discipline committee or authorized
hearing officer of the institution in accordance with Section 51.243. In no instance shall the
person issuing the withdrawal notice or causing it to be issued serve on any committee
where the validity of his order of withdrawal is in question.
Sec. 51.238. Reinstatement of Consent to Remain on Campus.
The chief administrative officer shall reinstate consent whenever he has reason to believe
that the presence of the person from whom consent was withdrawn will not constitute a
substantial and material threat to the orderly operation of the campus or facility.
Sec. 51.239. Entering or Remaining on Campus after Withdrawal of Consent.
(a) Any person who has been notified by the chief administrative officer of a campus or
facility of a state-supported institution of higher education, or by an officer or employee
designated by the chief administrative officer to maintain order on the campus or facility,
that consent to remain on the campus or facility has been withdrawn pursuant to Section
51.233, who has not had consent reinstated, and who willfully and knowingly enters or
remains upon the campus or facility during the period for which consent has been
withdrawn, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is subject to punishment as set out in Section
51.244.
(b) This section does not apply to any person who enters or remains on the campus or
facility for the sole purpose of applying to the chief administrative officer or authorized
officer or employee for the reinstatement of consent or for the sole purpose of attending a
hearing on the withdrawal.
Sec. 51.240. Authority to Suspend, Dismiss, or Expel Students or Employees Not Affected.
This subchapter does not affect the power of the duly constituted authorities of a state-
supported institution of higher education to suspend, dismiss, or expel any student or
employee at the university or college.
Sec. 51.241. Students and Employees Barred from Campus after Suspension or Dismissal.
(a) Every student or employee who has been suspended or dismissed from a state-
supported institution of higher education after a hearing, in accordance with procedures
established by the institution, for disrupting the orderly operation of the campus or facility
A-6
of the institution, as a condition of the suspension or dismissal, may be denied access to the
campus or facility, or both, of the institution for the period of suspension, and in the case
of dismissal, for a period not to exceed one year.
(b) A person who has been notified by personal service of the suspension or dismissal and
condition and who willfully and knowingly enters upon the campus or facility of the
institution to which he has been denied access, without the express written permission of
the chief administrative officer of the campus or facility, is guilty of a misdemeanor and is
subject to punishment as set out in Section 51.244.
(c) Knowledge shall be presumed if personal service has been given as prescribed in
Subsection (b) of this section.
Sec. 51.242. Refusing or Failing to Leave Building Closed to Public.
No person may refuse or fail to leave a building under the control and management of a
public agency, including a state-supported institution of higher education, during those
hours of the day or night when the building is regularly closed to the public, upon being
requested to do so by a guard, watchman, or other employee of a public agency, including
a state-supported institution of higher education, controlling and managing the building or
property, if the surrounding circumstances are such as to indicate to a reasonable person
that the individual or individuals have no apparent lawful business to pursue.
Sec. 51.243. Required Hearing Procedures.
A person from whom consent to remain on the campus of a state-supported institution of
higher education has been withdrawn in accordance with Section 51.233 is entitled, in
addition to the procedures set out in Section 51.234, to the following:
(1) to be represented by counsel;
(2) to the right to call and examine witnesses and to cross-examine adverse witnesses;
(3) to have all matters upon which the decision may be based introduced into evidence at
the hearing in his presence;
(4) to have the decision based solely on the evidence presented at the hearing;
(5) to prohibit the introduction of statements made against him unless he has been advised
of their content and the names of the persons who made them, and has been given the
opportunity to rebut unfavorable inferences that might otherwise be drawn; and
(6) to have all findings made at the hearing be final, subject only to his right to appeal to
the president and the governing board of the institution.
Sec. 51.244. Penalties.
A person who violates Section 51.239, 51.241, or 51.242 of this code is guilty of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction is subject to a fine of not more than $500 or
imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months, or both.
A-7
Form VI.F.1.: Report
of Non-Academic Misconduct
Any individual may use this form to report non-academic student misconduct. This form
should be submitted to the appropriate Chief Conduct Officer (list maintained at
www.lonestar.edu/ChiefConductOfficers).
Lone Star College strives to maintain a safe, orderly College community. Please describe the
facts, circumstances, and existing evidence of the misconduct, including names, dates, times,
and places, in as much detail as possible. List the name of any person (and contact
information, if available) who may have additional facts regarding the misconduct. Attach
additional sheets as necessary.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I understand that any statement I make on this Form VI.F.1 which is false, misleading, or not
made in good faith may be grounds for discipline.
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
For Office Use Only Date Received: ___________________________________________
Receiving Employee: _____________________________________ ____________________________________
Printed Name Signature
A-8
Form VI.F.2.: Chief Conduct Officer’s Decision
on Reported Non-Academic Misconduct
Chief Conduct Officers should use this form to memorialize their decisions regarding
reported non-academic misconduct. If the Chief Conduct Officer decides that a student has
engaged in non-academic misconduct, this form must be sent to the student (“Respondent”)
within ten working days of when the Chief Conduct Officer received the report of non-
academic misconduct.
Decision
I find that the Respondent ______ did or ______ did not engage in non-academic misconduct.
This decision represents my best judgment following a sufficient investigation into the
reported non-academic misconduct.
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
Investigation Narrative
Summarize the investigation into the reported non-academic misconduct. Attach additional
sheets as necessary. Attach copies of related Forms VI.F.1. and other related written reports.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Respondent Information (if applicable)
Name: _____________________________________________________ LSC ID No.: ____________________________
Email: _____________________________________________________ LSC college: ____________________________
Non-academic misconduct: _________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sanction(s) Imposed: ________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If you have been suspended or expelled, then you have the right to request a hearing
before a Discipline Committee by replying to this email with your request within five
working days. If you do not request a hearing, this decision will become final at 5:00
p.m. central time on .
A-9
Form VI.F.3.: Notice
of Discipline Committee Hearing
When a student (“Respondent”) entitled to a hearing before the Discipline Committee
requests such a hearing, the Chief Conduct Officer shall send this completed form or a written
communication containing equivalent information should be sent to the following: (1) the
Respondent; (2) the college president for the college to provide the Discipline Committee for
the hearing (contact the Office of the General Counsel for the appropriate college); (3) the
Chief Conduct Officer’s college president; and (4) the Office of the General Counsel. If the
hearing will be a joint hearing, list all Respondents. Include with this form the Forms VI.F.2.
and VI.F.1. related to the hearing.
Respondent Name(s): _______________________________________________________________________________
LSC college to provide Discipline Committee: _____________________________________________________
Chief Conduct Officer whose decision will be reviewed: __________________________________________
Hearing Date: ___________________________ Hearing Time: ______________________ Central Time
Hearing Location: ____________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All hearing participants should arrive at least 15 minutes early on the date of the hearing.
The hearing will be conducted according to the policies found in the Lone Star College Board
Policy Manual Section VI.F. and Procedures adopted thereunder. A copy of these policies and
procedures are attached hereto.
RecommendedSanction(ifapplicable)
We recommend that Respondent receive the following sanction for non-academic
misconduct:
_______ Expulsion; ______ Suspension for up to ______ weeks from _________________ college(s) or
_______ all colleges, including centers, workforce, and online courses; or
______ Other sanction: ________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This decision represents our best judgment regarding the subject matter of the hearing.
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
FormVI.F.4.:Decision
ofDisciplineCommittee
Discipline Committees should use this form to record their decisions according to Section
VI.F. of the Policy Manual and the procedures adopted thereunder. This decision must be
signed by at least three members of the Discipline Committee who attended the hearing for
this matter.
1
The Chief Conduct Officers decision (Form VI.F.2.) that preceded the hearing
should be attached to this form.
Decision
Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, we find that ___________________________________
(Respondent) ______ did or ______ didnot engage in the following non-academic misconduct:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Printed Name Signature Date
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
1
Student committee members are not required to sign this Form. They may document their agreement or
disagreement with the committee’s decision verbally to the other committee members.
A
-10
A-11
Form VI.F.5.: Appeal
of Discipline Committee Decision
Either the College (through a Chief Conduct Officer) or the Respondent (personally or
through a representative) may appeal a Discipline Committee’s decision by submitting this
completed form to the Office of the Vice Chancellor of Student Success within five working
days after receiving the Discipline Committee’s decision. Late appeals will not be considered.
Attach the Discipline Committee decision (Form VI.F.4., with all accompanying
documentation) being appealed and use the space below to explain why this decision should
be modified or reversed. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Also, state what final
outcome you would like for this matter.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Requested Final Outcome
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I understand that by appealing this matter, the Vice Chancellor of Student Success will have
complete discretion over this matter and may reach whatever decision and impose whatever
sanction, if any, that the Vice Chancellor of Student Success considers appropriate. I also
understand that the Vice Chancellor of Student Success’s decision is final.
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
For Office Use Only Date Received: ___________________________________________
Receiving Employee: _____________________________________ ____________________________________
Printed Name Signature
A-12
Form VI.F.6.: Final Decision After Review
of Appealed Discipline Committee Decision
The Vice Chancellor of Student Success shall use this form to memorialize his or her final
decision regarding an appealed Discipline Committee decision.
Within five working days of receiving an appeal, this completed form must be sent to the
following: (1) the Respondent; (2) the Chief Conduct Officer; (3) the Chief Conduct Officer’s
college president; and (4) the Office of the General Counsel. A copy of all relevant forms
related to this appeal should be attached to this decision.
Final Decision
After reviewing this matter, the Discipline Committee’s decision is:
______ Affirmed; ______ Reversed; or
______ Modified as follows: ___________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________.
This decision represents my best judgment in this matter.
____________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
A-13
Form VI.F.7.: Discipline Agreement
At any time, the College may choose to enter into an agreement to impose certain sanctions
in exchange for a student admitting that he or she engaged in non-academic misconduct. Any
such agreement must be in writing, signed by the Chief Conduct Officer and the student, and
should use this form or contain substantially similar information.
Student’s Admission
I unconditionally admit to having engaged in the following non-academic misconduct:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________ ____________________ _________________________________ __________________
Printed Name LSC ID No. Signature Date
Chief Conduct Officer’s Judgment
I impose the following sanction on the student for the admitted non-academic misconduct:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The imposed sanction represents my best judgment of what is an appropriate sanction,
considering all applicable facts and circumstances.
____________________________________________ ______________________________________ __________________
Printed Name Signature Date
click to sign
signature
click to edit
click to sign
signature
click to edit