Fill - Free fillable KE RN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL ADVISORY (Kern Council of Governments) PDF form

1

KE

RN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE

K

ern COG – Virtual Meeting Via GoToMeeting

1401 19TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR

Wednesday

March 31, 2021 (April meeting)

BAKER

SFIELD, CALIFORNIA 10:00 A.M.

*O

n March 17, 2020 Governor Newsom issued Executive Order, N-29-20

. This order removes the

requirement that a location be made available for the public to gather for purposes of observing and

commenting at the meeting.

OUT OF AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION REGARDING THE COVID-19 VIRUS, THE SCHEDULED

MARCH 31, 2021 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AT 10:00

A.M. WILL BE HELD VIA TELECONFERENCE.

CALL-IN INFORMATION:

h

ttps://www.gotomeet.me/KernCOG/ttacmeeting

Dial +1 (786) 535-3211

Access Code: 269-963-557

I

. ROLL CALL:

I

I. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to address the Committee

on any matter not on this agenda but under the jurisdiction of the Committee. Committee members

may respond briefly to statements made or questions posed. They may ask a question for clarification;

make a referral to staff for factual information or request staff to report back to the Committee at a later

meeting. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND

ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD PRIOR TO MAKING A PRESENTATION.

D

isabled individuals who need special assistance to attend or participate in a meeting of the

Transportation Technical Advisory Committee may request assistance at 1401 19th Street, Suite 300;

Bakersfield CA 93301 or by calling (661) 635-2900. Every effort will be made to reasonably

accommodate individuals with disabilities by making meeting material available in alternative formats.

Requests for assistance should be made at least three (3) working days in advance whenever possible.

I

II. APPROVAL OF DISCUSSION SUMMARY: Minutes from meeting of March 3, 2021.

IV. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CYCLE 5 MPO / KERN COG PROJECT LIST (Snoddy)

Comment: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) State staff adopted the Active

Transportation Program (ATP) 2021 Fund Estimate and Guidelines at its March 24-25, 2021 meeting

which provides provisions for MPO’s to select and fund ATP projects for Cycle 5.

Action: Recommend that the Transportation Planning Policy Committee adopt Attachment A -ATP

MPO Cycle 5 project list and ATP MPO Cycle 5 Contingency List.

V. APRIL TDA PUBLIC TRANSIT AND STREETS AND ROADS CLAIMS FOR THE CITY OF

TEHACHAPI (Snoddy)

Comment: Review and recommendation of the City of Tehachapi’s FY 2020-21 Public Transit and

Streets and Roads claims totaling $540,083.

Action: Review TDA Public Transit claims and Streets and Roads claims received by March 19, 2021,

for $540,083 and recommend approval to the Transportation Planning Policy Committee.

2

VI. KCOG PROJECT DELIVERY POLICY AND PROCEDURES UPDATE (Stramaglia)

Comment: The KCOG Project Delivery Policy and Procedures document (Policy) will be updated to

require the annual status reporting of TDA Article 3 projects not yet advanced.

Action: Recommend that the Transportation Planning and Policy Committee approve the Final

KCOG Project Selection Policy and Procedures update.

VII. 2021 MID-CYCLE STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Stramaglia)

Comment: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has developed and anticipates the

adoption the 2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in response to the

C

oronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 (Federal Act).

Action: Information.

VIII. 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Stramaglia)

Comment: Every two years in the odd-numbered year, regional transportation planning agencies are

to submit a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) to the California Transportation

Commission for their approval in December of the same odd-numbered year.

Action: Information

IX. THE FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2021 FTA SECTION 5311 CALL FOR PROJECTS (Snoddy)

Comment: Rural agencies providing public transportation services are eligible to apply for FY 2021

funding from the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) through the Section 5311 program. Nine

local agencies are eligible to apply.

Action: Staff recommends the members of the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

recommend that the Transportation Planning Policy Committee adopt by resolution FY 2021 FTA

Section 5311 Program of Projects and the CRRSAA Program of Projects.

X. ELECTION OF OFFICERS (Invina)

Comment: The Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) Transportation Technical Advisory

Committee (TTAC) selects a Chairperson and a Vice Chairperson for the TTAC for the next year.

Action: Select a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson for the Kern COG TTAC.

XI. ANNOUNCEMENTS

XI

I. MEMBER ITEMS

XI

II. ADJOURNMENT- The next meeting will be held on May 5, 2021.

1

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE

KERN COG BOARD ROOM/GO TO MEETING Wednesday

1401 19

th

Street, Suite 300 March 3, 2021

BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 10:00 A.M.

Chairman Schlosser called the meeting to order at approximately 10:02 a.m. A roll call was conducted by Ms.

McCulloch for attendance.

I. ROLL CALL

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Lorena Mendibles Caltrans

Christine Viterelli City of Arvin

Stuart Patteson City of Bakersfield

Shawn Monk California City

Ed Galero City of Delano

Bard Lower City of Ridgecrest

Alex Gonzalez City of Shafter

Teresa Binkley City of Taft

Jay Schlosser City of Tehachapi

Kameron Arnold City of Wasco

Bob Neath County of Kern

Steve Barnes GET

Joe West NOR/CTSA

OTHER:

Adam Ojeda City of Arvin

Ryan Starbuck City of Bakersfield

Susana Kormendi City of Bakersfield

Travis Reed City of Ridgecrest

Yolanda Alcantar County of Kern

Michael Dillenbeck County of Kern

Troy Hightower TDH Associates

Robert Williams GET

Cindy Parra Bike Bakersfield

Asha Chandy Bike Bakersfield

Scott Lau Caltrans

Viviana Zamora City of Delano

STAFF:

Ahron Hakimi Kern COG

Rob Ball Kern COG

Bob Snoddy Kern COG

Linda Urata Kern COG

Raquel Pacheco Kern COG

Veronica McCulloch Kern COG

Rochelle Invina Kern COG

Joseph Stramaglia Kern COG

Vincent Liu Kern COG

II. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to address the Committee on any

matter not on this agenda but under the jurisdiction of the Committee. Committee members may respond

2

briefly to statements made or questions posed. They may ask a question for clarification; make a referral to

staff for factual information or request staff to report back to the Committee at a later meeting.

SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE

RECORD PRIOR TO MAKING A PRESENTATION.

Chairman Schlosser asked for public comments. There were none.

III. APPROVAL OF DISCUSSION SUMMARY: Minutes from meeting of February 3, 2021.

IV. KERN COG STATE OF GOOD REPAIR – FY 2021-22 ESTIMATE

Mr. Snoddy addressed the committee with the following information:

The State Controller’s Office has issued an estimate for the Kern Region’s FY 2021-22 for $1,438,351.

This item was for information only.

V. FY 2021/2022 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENT ESTIMATE

Mr. Snoddy addressed the committee with the following information:

The total Transportation Development Act (TDA) funding for the fiscal year 2021/2022 is estimated to be

$44,665,284.

This item was for information only.

VI. CALL FOR PROJECTS: TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PROGRAM

Mr. Snoddy addressed the committee with the following information:

Article 3 funds are used to pay for bicycle and pedestrian safety programs, bicycle parking facilities, bicycle

travel facilities and, pedestrian facilities. Approximately $751,215 is available for distribution in this funding

cycle, with $410,965 obligated from previous funding cycles leaving $340,250 for new projects in the fiscal

year 2021-22.

Eligible claimants of Article 3 funding are the eleven incorporated cities within Kern County and the County

of Kern. Each project proposed must be submitted on forms provided by the Kern Council of Governments

and are awarded on a competitive basis. The proposal deadline is 5:00 p.m. on Monday, June 14, 2021.

Applications are included with this staff report and are available at

https://www.kerncog.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/TDA3_claim_2019.pdf

This item was for information only.

VII. POSSIBLE REDUCTION IN TRANSPORTION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) FUNDING AND THE

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION’S (FTA) CARES ACT

Mr. Snoddy addressed the committee with the following information:

Golden Empire Transit District (GET) is introducing an innovative paratransit service called On-Demand.

Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, GET has been forced to alter its service hours to adjust for revenue loss

brought on by a drastic reduction in ridership demand. However, the Covid-19 pandemic has also offered an

3

opportunity for GET staff to re-think how service is delivered and hopefully, address the loss in service hours

and add service coverage to its customers.

Introducing On-Demand. GET will be combining all of its paratransit demand-responsive services (Get-A-Lift,

Non-emergency Transit, and RYDE micro-transit) into one, system: On-Demand.

Robert Williams from GET provided a summary of the new service and explained why GET is considering

changing its paratransit services. Highlights were expansion of the micro transit zone (which is 7.6 sq. miles),

the new tiered fare structure, co-mingling new systems, and the implementation of the RFP. The contract

was awarded to VIA in September 2020.

Mr. Neath, Ms. Viterilli, and Mr. Schlosser commended GET and their staff for their On-Demand service.

This item was for information only.

VIII. FTA SECTION 5310 2019 REMAINING FUNDS

Mr. Snoddy addressed the committee providing the following information:

Caltrans released an application for FTA Section 5310 funding in the Kern urbanized area on

Feb. 9, 2021. The deadline for applications is March 24, 2021. Kern COG will not be doing a Call for Projects.

This item was for information only.

IX. ATP CYCLE 5 CTC STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS

Mr. Snoddy addressed the committee providing the following information:

The CTC released its staff recommendations for the statewide ATP Cycle 5 Call for Projects, and the state

chose one of Delano’s applications to be funded. Remaining Kern region applicants are under consideration

for a separate MPO funding which will use the existing state ranking list.

This item was for information only.

X. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CYCLE 5 – MPO PROJECT LIST

Mr. Snoddy addressed the committee providing the following information:

The remaining 11 Kern region applications are under consideration for an MPO funding opportunity which will

consider the existing state ranking list. Under the direction of the adopted Kern COG Project Delivery Policies

and Procedures, Kern COG will review remaining applications and consider them for MPO funding.A draft

Project list will be circulated in March for information and then in April for approval by the TTAC and Board of

Directors.

Ms. Viterilli asked for more information on Kern COG’s Safe Routes for Cyclists in Kern County's

Disadvantaged Communities project, and Mr. Snoddy will provide the information.

This item was for information only.

XI. REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) – DRAFT TIMELINE AND FUND

ESTIMATE

Ms. Pacheco addressed the committee providing the following information:

4

Kern COG staff developed a draft timeline and fund estimate to facilitate programming new Regional Surface

Transportation Program projects. After approval by the Transportation Planning Policy Committee on March

18th, the draft timeline will be used for the upcoming Regional Surface Transportation Program call for

projects cycle.

The action requested is that the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee recommend approval of the

RSTP Timeline and Fund Estimate to the Transportation Planning Policy Committee.

Motion by Mr. Barnes, Second by Mr. Monk, motion passed unanimously.

XII. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) PROGRAM – DRAFT TIMELINE AND FUNDING

TIMELINE

Ms. Pacheco addressed the committee providing the following information:

Kern COG staff developed a draft timeline and funding targets to facilitate programming new

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality projects. After approval by the Transportation Planning Policy

Committee on March 18th, the draft timeline will be used for the upcoming Congestion Mitigation and Air

Quality call for projects cycle.

The action requested is that the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee recommend approval of the

CMAQ Timeline and Funding Targets to the Transportation Planning Policy Committee.

Motion by Mr. Lower, Second by Ms. Binkley, motion passed unanimously

XIII. ARVIN PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Ms. Pacheco addressed the committee providing the following information:

At the February 3rd Transportation Technical Advisory Committee meeting, Kern COG staff was directed to

set-up a meeting with City of Arvin staff and Kern County staff to discuss revised delivery schedules for City

of Arvin projects. The staff report includes a summary of two meetings held regarding KER180403 Haven Dr

and KER161010 Varsity Rd. Attached to the staff report are project delivery letters provided by Adam Ojeda,

City Engineer for the City of Arvin.

Mr. Adam Ojeda noted that Arvin and Kern County staff have drafted two separate agreements which are

expected to be presented for consideration at the March 9th City of Arvin Council meeting and then at the

March 23rd Kern County Board of Supervisors meeting. The RSTP and ATP projects are on track to be

delivered.

This item was for information only.

XIV. HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM – STATUS UPDATE

Ms. Pacheco addressed the committee providing the following information:

On February 3rd, the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee recommended to first divert $106,095 of

funding that comes in to fulfilling the HIP program. Then divert the remaining funds to two regional projects:

environmental phase of the SR 58 Truck Climbing Lanes project and the right of way phase of the Hageman

Flyover project. On February 18

th

, the Kern COG Board approved the Transportation Technical Advisory

Committee recommendation with the added clarification to split funding evenly between the regional projects.

Meanwhile, Kern COG has received the smaller of the two pots of HIP funding which is enough to fulfill the

existing HIP program. The staff of the California Transportation Commission and Caltrans continue to analyze

how best to distribute the larger pot of HIP funding statewide. Two scenarios have been discussed, one would

5

distribute the funding similar to the Regional Surface Transportation Program and the other would be similar

to the State Transportation Improvement Program, but again both are still being evaluated. Kern COG was

informed this morning that there will be another workshop to discuss a deviation from the Regional Surface

Transportation Program scenario. Lastly, the California Transportation Commission staff will develop their

recommendation for approval at the March California Transportation Commission meeting.

This item is for information only.

XV. 2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Mr. Stramaglia addressed the committee providing the following information:

The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has initiated the 2022 Regional Transportation

Improvement Program (2022 RTIP) process at their January 27– 28, 2021 meeting to develop a statewide

2022 State Transportation Improvement Program (2022 STIP) for projects of regional significance.

He announced to save the dates for the 2022 RTIP KCOG workkshops scheduled in May, July and

September. Also included in the staff report are the current listings of State Highway Maintenance Project

Investments.

This item is for information only.

XVI. 2022 STATE HIGHWAY OPERATIONAL AND PROTECTION PROGRAM

Mr. Stramaglia addressed the committee providing the following information:

The California Transportation Commission (CTC) and Caltrans will begin the next update of the State

Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) in upcoming months. A project list with maps was

emailed. The anticpated meeting schedule for the 2022 SHOPP update is included. There is no comment

period at this time but if members have comments or questions, contact Mr. Stramaglia.

This item is for information only.

XVII. ANNOUNCEMENTS

Mr. Snoddy announced the call for projects for LCTOP. He emailed the eligible member agencies the

information and those member agencies will need to coordinate with him.

Ms. Invina announced the next TTAC meeting will be the elections for Chairman and Vice-Chairman. She

also added Mr. Stramaglia wanted to remind members the next CTC meeting is March 24-25

th

.

XVIII. MEMBER ITEMS

Ms. Viterilli wanted to share the communities of Arvin and Lamont have been awarded AB 617 funding from

the California Air Resource Board (CARB). Currently they are forming a steering committee. There is a link

on the CARB and San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution websites for those are interested in joining the steering

committee.

Mr. Schlosser announced this was Mr. Lower’s last TTAC meeting and wished him luck in this retirement.

XIX. ADJOURNMENT – Meeting adjourned at 11:12 AM. The next meeting will be held on March 31, 2021 (April

meeting).

IV.

TTAC

Mar

ch 31, 2021

T

O: Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

F

ROM: Ahron Hakimi,

Executive Director

By: Robert M. Snoddy,

Regional Planner

SU

BJECT: TTAC AGENDA ITEM: IV.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CYCLE 5 MPO / KERN COG PROJECT LIST

DESCRIPTION: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) State staff adopted the Active

Transportation Program (ATP) 2021 Fund Estimate and Guidelines at its March 24-25, 2021 meeting

which provides provisions for MPO’s to select and fund ATP projects for Cycle 5.

DISCUSSION: At its March 24-25, 2021 meeting, the CTC State staff announced recommendations for

the statewide selection of ATP Cycle 5 applications. Kern region agencies submitted 12 applications for a

total value of $14,618,000. The State staff recommendation list of projects selected one project from the

Kern region which was for the City of Delano. The project was ranked 93. The remaining 11 Kern region

applications are under consideration for a separate regional funding opportunity which will consider the

existing state ranking list.

Under the direction of its adopted Kern COG Project Delivery Policies and Procedures, Kern COG will

review remaining applications and consider them for regional funding. The State staff adopted ATP Cycle

5 Fund Estimate indicates that the Kern regional share is $4,345,000 over the four years, from 21-22

through 24-25. A draft Project list will be circulated in March for information and then in April for approval

by the TTAC and Board of Directors. After that, the project list is submitted to the CTC. A Draft

recommendation is due to the CTC by April 15, 2021, and a final recommendation is due to the CTC no

later than May 14, 2021. The CTC will adopt the MPO selected projects at the June 23-24, 2021 meeting.

To advance this process, Kern COG staff convened a TTAC sub-committee workshop on February 17,

2021, to gain additional information about delivery details for the remaining 11 ATP applications. Kern

COG staff will develop a draft Capital Improvement Program based on CTC MPO funding limits and the

ranking scores of the remaining project list. This project list will be circulated to TTAC after the workshop.

ATP Cycle 5 information may be downloaded at https://catc.ca.gov/programs/active-transportation-

program and https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-state-programs/active-transportation-

program/cycle5.

Action: Recommend that the Transportation Planning Policy Committee adopt Attachment A - ATP MPO

Cycle 5 Project List and Attachment B - ATP MPO Cycle 5 Contingency List

Attachments: Proposed MPO Project List and Proposed MPO Contingency List

Kern Council of Governments

1401 19

th

Streets, Suite 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 661-635-2900 Facsimile 661-324-8215 TTY 661-832-7433 www.kerncog.org

ATTACHMENT A - DRAFT 2021 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - MPO LISTING

Application ID Score County Project Title Total Cost

ATP

Funds

21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25

9-Tehachapi, City of-1 86 Kern

SRTS Dennison Road Bicycle/Pedestrian

Corridor Improvement Project

$ 2,437 $ 2,432 $ 345 $ 2,087 $ - $ -

6-Kern Council of Governments-1 84 Kern

Safe Routes for Cyclists in Kern County's

Disadvantaged Communities

$ 826 $ 792 $ 792 $ - $ - $ -

6-Delano, City of-2 81 Kern

ATP-5 Bike Lane and Sidewalk Gap

Improvement Project

$ 925 $ 911 $ - $ - $ 911 $ -

6-Bakersfield, City of-2 80 Kern

Chester Avenue (4th Street to Brundage

Lane) Note 1

$ 791 $ 210 $ 791 $ - $ - $ -

$ 4,979 $ 4,345 $1,928

$ 2,087 $ 911 $ -

$ 4,345

$ -

MPO Programming Capacity as indicated by adopted 2021 ATP Fund Estimate

Balance of proposed ATP / MPO requests and available MPO funding

Note 1: The original ATP funding request for this project is $791,000. The amount was reduced to $210,000 to financially constrain this proposed list. The City of

Bakersfield would provide the match of $581,000 to keep the scope of the project whole.

ATTACHMENT B - DRAFT 2021 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MPO CONTINGENCY LIST

Application ID Score County Project Title Total Cost ATP Funds 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25

6-Bakersfield, City of-4 79 Kern

North Bakersfield Bicycle

Connectivity Project

$ 234 $ 234 $ 234 $ - $ - $ -

9-Tehachapi, City of-2 73 Kern

Valley Boulevard and Mill

Street Gap Closure

Project

$ 3,509 $ 2,934 $ 284 $ 2,650 $ - $ -

6-Bakersfield, City of-3 72 Kern Garces Memorial Circle $ 172 $ 172 $ 172 $ - $ - $ -

6-Wasco, City of-1 67 Kern

Central Avenue Class I &

Class II Bicycle Trails,

Wasco

$ 409 $ 404 $ 35 $ 369 $ - $ -

6-Bakersfield, City of-1 60 Kern

California Avenue

(Oleander Avenue to R

Street)

$ 770 $ 770 $ 770 $ - $ - $ -

6-Bakersfield, City of-5 57 Kern Kern River at 24th Street $ 1,368 $ 1,368 $ 127 $ - $ 117 $ 1,124

6-Kern County - D6-1 25 Kern

Kern River Parkway Multi-

Use Path Safety

Improvement Project

$ 1,999 $ 1,939 $ - $ 1,939 $ - $ -

March 31, 2021

TO: Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi,

Executive Director

By: Robert M. Snoddy

Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TTAC AGENDA ITEM: V.

APRIL TDA PUBLIC TRANSIT AND STREETS AND ROADS CLAIMS FOR THE CITY

OF TEHACHAPI

DESCRIPTION:

Review and recommendation of the City of Tehachapi’s FY 2020-21 Public Transit and Streets and

Roads claims totaling $540,083.

DISCUSSION:

TDA funds are apportioned in two separate apportionments. First, the Local Transportation Fund (LTF)

may be used for public transit operations and capital projects as well as streets and roads maintenance (

The agency must find by resolution that there are no unmet transit needs by a public hearing process).

The second, State Transit Assistance (STA) fund may be used only for public transit operations and

capital projects.

Below is a list of Public Transit and Streets and Roads claims received by September 21, 2020 TTAC

agenda deadline:

Claimants LTF STA Regional Totals

Tehachapi

FY 2020-21

Public Transit $172,997 $0 $172,997

Tehachapi

FY 2020-21

Streets nd Roads $367,086 $0 $367,086

Regional Claims $540,083 $0 $540,083

These claims have been evaluated in accordance with the following criteria: 1) the maximum funding level

does not exceed claimant’s deferred revenues, plus current year apportionments, less required public

transit financing; 2) claimant has conducted a public meeting within its jurisdiction to receive testimony

regarding unmet transit needs and has made an appropriate finding by resolution of its governing body; 3)

project(s) proposed for funding is in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and 4) claimant

has not requested or received funds in excess of its current year expenditure. Staff recommends

approval.

Action:

Review TDA Public Transit claims and Streets and Roads claims received by March 19, 2021, for

$540,083 and recommend approval to the Transportation Planning Policy Committee.

Attachments: Staff reviewed TDA claims submitted to Kern COG by March 19, 2021

V.

TTAC

I.

Claimant

Agency:

Mailing Address:

Office Address:

City/State/Zip:

Telephone:

WEB

Site:

II.

Contact Person

Name:

Title:

Department:

Office Address:

City/State/Zip:

Telephone:

E-mail:

Kern Council of Governments

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT

STREETS AND ROADS CLAIM (FY 2020-2021)

Part 1 of 6 - CLAIMANT INFORMATION

City of Tehachapi

115 South Robinson Street

Tehachapi, CA 93561

(661) 822-2200

www

.tehachapicityhall.com

Susan C Wier

Financial Analyst

Finance

115 South Robinson Street

Tehachapi, CA

93561

(661) 822-2200 ext

111

swier@tehachapicityhall.com

City

of

Tehachapi

TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT

ACT

STREETS

AND

ROADS

CLAIM

Part

2

of

6 •

Claim

and

Assurances

For

Fiscal

Year

2020-2021

A.

CLAIM:

The

City

of

Tehachapi

hereby

claims

all

Local

Transportation

Fund

apportionments

and

allocations

for

the

2020-2021

flscal

year

plus

all

unencumbered

fund

balances

and/or

deferred

revenues

held

In

Its

local

treasury

less

funds

first

allocated

for

transit

uses.

8.

COMPLIANCE

ASSURANCES:

T

he

City

of

Tehachapi

hereby

certifies

that,

as

a

condition

of

receiving

funds

pursuant

to

Public

Utilities

Code

Section

99200,

et

seq.

and

California

Administrative

Code

Section

6600,

et

seq.,

as

amended,

It

shall

ensure

that:

1.

All

funds

will

be

expended

in

compliance

with

the

requirements

of

Public

Utilities

Code

Sections

99200

through

99408,

Callfornla

Administrative

Code

Sections

6600

through

6684,

Office

of

the

State

Controller

"Guldelines

Relating

to

Gae

Tax

Expenditures"

and

Kern

Council

of

Governments'

Transportation

Development

Act

Rules

and

Regulatlons.

2.

All

funds

will

be

expended

In

accordance

with

the

budgets

described

In

Parts

4

and

5

of

this

claim,

attached

hereto

and

made

a

part

hereof,

by

this

reference.

These

assurances

are

given

In

consideration

of

and

for

the

purpose

of

obtaining

any

and

all

funds

allocated

for

streets

and

roads

purposes

pursuant

to

Public

Utllltles

Code,

Division

10,

Part

11,

Chapter

4

of

the

State

of

California.

The

person

whose

signature

appears

below

has

been

authorized

to

provide

the

assurances

cited

above

and

prepare,

submit

and

execute

this

claim

on

behalf

of:

J

-II-~

Date

City

Manager

Title

C.

FINANCIAL

ASSURANCES:

As

the

chief

financial

officer

of

the

City

of

Tehachapi

I

hereby

attest

to

the

reasonableness

and

accuracy

of

the

financlal

information

presented

in

this

claim

and

declare

It

to

be

consistent

with

the

uniform

system

of

accounts

and

records

adopted

by

the

Controller

of

the

State

of

California.

;t

,, !zr»-1

iBate

'

Finance

Director

Title

City of Tehachapi

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT

STREETS

AND

ROADS

CLAIM

Part 3 of 6 -

FY

2019-2020 Revenues and Expenditures

Account/Description

I.

Prior Year Available Resources

A.

Deferred Revenues - Actual unexpended prior year TOA cash receipts held

in

claimant's treasury as of June

30,

2019 (from prior year audit report)

8. Prior Year Cash Receipts from trust funds - TOA cash receipts

through June 30, 2020

1. Local Transportation Fund

C.

Prior Year Interest Earned - interest earnings on claimant cash balances

through June 30, 2020

D.

Fund Balance - Actual fund balances

or

reserves held

in

claimant's

treasury as of June 30, 2020 (from prior year audit report)

E.

TOTAL

FY 2019-2020 AVAILABLE RESOURCES (Lines A+B1+C+D)

II.

FY

2019-2020 Expenditures

F.

Administration and Engineering

G. Maintenance

H.

Construction

I.

Equipment

J. Other

K.

TOTAL

FY 2019-2020 EXPENDITURES (Lines F+G+H+l+J)

L.

AVAILABLE RESOURCES AT JUNE 30, 2020 - enter here and Part 4, Line A

(Line E-K)

Amount

$ (7,766)

$ 358,751

$

350,985

$

277,160

$

87,769

$

(3,293)

$ 361,635

$

(10,650)

City

of

Tehachapi

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT

ACT

STREETS

AND

ROADS

CLAIM

Part 4 of 6 - Object Budget

For Fiscal Year 2020-2021

AccounVDescription

I.

Prior Year Available Resources

A.

Available Resources - estimated unexpended prior year TOA cash receipts

held in claimant's treasury as of June 30, 2020 (from Part 3, Line

L)

B.

Trust Fund Balances at June 30, 2020

1.

Local Transportation Fund

C.

FY 2020-2021 Trust Fund Apportionments - (from Kern COG estimate)

1.

Local Transportation Fund

2.

Regional Planning Contribution

D.

FY 2020-2021 Interest Earned - estimated interest earnings on claimant cash

balances through

June

30, 2020

E.

TOTAL

ESTIMATED FY 2020-2021 AVAILABLE RESOURCES

(Line A+B1

+C1

+C2+D)

II. FY 2020-2021 Planning & Transit Allocations

F. Local Transportation Fund

1.

Public Transit (from transit claim)

2. Regional Planning Contribution (from Fund Estimate, Schedule 8)

G. NET ESTIMATED PRIOR

YEAR

AVAILABLE

RESOURCES (Line E-F1-F2)

Ill. FY 2020-2021 Estimated Expenditures

H. Administration and Engineering

I.

Maintenance

J. Construction

K.

Equipment

L.

Other

M.

TOTAL

FY 2020-2021 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES-Itemize in Part 5

(Line H+l+J+K+L)

N.

Capital Outlay Reserve Allocations

1. Local Transportation Fund

0.

DEFERRED REVENUES

OR

FUND BALANCE

AT

JUNE 30, 2020

Amount

$ (10,650)

$ 135,472

$

552

,

669

$

17,093

$ 694,584

$ 17,093

$ 677,491

$ 257,137

$

99,299

$

356,436

$

(Line G-M-N1) =$======3=2=1,=05=5=

FY

2020-2021

NET

CLAIM

AMOUNT Cline M w Line A)

1.l

.;.$

___

..;,3.;.67~,.;.08_6_,I

City

of T ehachapl

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT

ACT

STREETS

AND

ROADS

CLAIM

Part

5 of 6 - Project

Budget

For

Fiscal

Year

2020-2021

Location/Description

Requires

project location

and

description

of

project

Street maintenance/construction throughout

the

City

TOT

AL

FY

2020-2021 PROJECT EXPENDITURES

(Equal

to

Part

4,

Line

M)

Expenditures

$

367,086

$

367,086

City

of'

Tehachapi

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT

ACT

STREETS

AND

ROADS

CLAIM

Part

6 of 6 - Supplemental Information

For

Fiscal Year

2020-2021

Attach

the

following documentation:

1.

A copy of

the

proof

of

publication for the public notice regarding conduct

of

a hearing for the

purpose

of receiving

public

testimony regarding transit

needs

within the claimant's service area.

2.

A copy of the governing

body's

resolution or minute order which makes

one

of

the

following

findings:

a.

There

are

no

unmet transit needs.

b.

There are

no

unmet transit needs that

are

reasonable to meet.

c.

There are unmet transit

needs,

including

needs

that are reasonable to

meet.

3.

A

copy

of

the

governing

body's

authorization to

execute

and

file this

claim

.

cm

OF

rEHACHAPl

LEGAL

DErARTMEN"f

RESOLUTION

NO. 08-21

A

RESOLUTION

OF

THE

CITY

COUNCIL

OF

THE

CITY

OF

TEHACHAPI

FINDING

THAT

THERE

ARE

NO

UNMET

TRANSfT

NEEDS

THAT

ARE

REASONABLE

TO

MEET

WITHIN

THE

CfTY.

WHEREAS,

the

City

of

Tehachapi City Council conducted a public hearing

on

Tuesday, February 16, 2021,

to

consider possible unmet transit needs within the

City,

and;

WHEREAS,

the

City

of

Tehachapi currently provides public transportation

service

within

the City

of

Tehachapi, and;

WHEREAS,

the

objectives

of

providing the public transportation system

are

to

meet

the public need

for

limited cost transportation,

to

serve the mobility limited

population, and

to

provide

an

alternative

to

private vehicle transportation.

NOW,

THEREFORE,

BE

IT

RESOLVED

by

the

City

of

Tehachapi City Council that,

after holding a duly advertised public hearing and receiving public testimony,

it

finds there

are

no

areas within

the

City with unmet public transit needs which could

be

reasonably

met

by expansion

of

the

existing system

or

establishment

of

a new system.

BE

IT

FURTHER

RESOLVED,

that

a copy

of

this resolution be transmitted

to

the

Kern County Council

of

Governments in conjunction with the filing

of

claims

for

Transportation Development Act

Funds

for

Fiscal Year 2021-22

and

that

the

City Manager

is

authorized

to

execute

said

claims.

PASSED

AND

ADOPTED

by the City Council

of

the City

of

Tehachapi this 16th day

of

February, 2021.

1

CITY

OF

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL DEPARTMENT

AYES:

NOES:

SMITH,

DAV

I

ES,

POGON-CORD,

SCR

I

VNE

R,

WIGGINS

NONE

ABSENT:

NONE

ABSTAIN:

NONE

ATTEST:

T~vl~

TORI

MARSH,

CMC,

CITY

CLERK

City

of

Tehachapi, California

,

MAYOR

City ofTehachapi, California

I hereby certify

that

the

foregoing resolution was duly and regularly

adopted by

the

City Council

of

the

City

of

Tehachapi at a regular meeting

thereof

held on February 16, 2021

TORI

MARSH,

CMC,

CITY

CLERK

City

of

Tehachapi, California

STATE

OF

CAUFORNI,-.

County

of

Kern)

I,

I

OY',

YY\q.r'S

~

City

Clerk

of

the

CITY

OF

TEHACHAPI,

Stale

of

Gallfomfa,

hereby

cerlll11

the

roregolng

to

be a

full,

true

and

C:OINCI

copy

of

Iha o

riginal

(«

S • 0

f3

-«

\

on

file

In lhlsofflceandth

a!

I

tmVAoompared~samewl

lh~eorlginal.

WITNESS

my

hand

and

seal

this

) -

day

of JrvM'{;JA'-1

, \ • if\/\ .

J.

Citv

Clerk

By:

f.:Tr,.....

I

~

\.eVltx"--

By:

-·---

DeoutvCllyClerk

CERTIFICATION

OF

EXCERPT

OF

MINUTES

TEHACHAPI

CITY

COUNCIL

February

16,

2021

Upon

motion by Councilmember Scrivner

and

seconded

by

Councilmember

Pagon-Cord,

and

carried, the Council affirmed the recommended action

on

the item

as

follows:

ADOPTED

RESOLUTION

NO.

08-21

FINDING

THAT

THERE

ARE

NO

UNMET

TRANSIT

NEEDS

THAT

ARE

REASONABLE

TO

MEET

WITHIN

THE

CITY

Vote

was

as

follows:

AYES:

SMITH,

DAVIES,

POGON-CORD,

SCRIVNER,

WIGGINS

NOES:

NONE

ABSENT:

NONE

ABSTAIN:

NONE

STATE

OF

CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY

OF

KERN)

I,

TORI

MARSH,

City

Clerk

of

the City

of

Tehachapi,

California, do hereby certify that the foregoing

is

a true and correct excerpt from the minutes

of

the Tehachapi City

Council

meeting held

on

February 16, 2021.

DATED:

February

18,

2021

TEHACHAPI

CITY

COUNCIL

~~~

Tori Marsh,

CMC,

City

Clerk

City

of

Tehachapi

TEHACHAPI

CITY

COUNCIL

NOTICE

OF

PUBLIC

HEARING

COMMUNITY

TRANSIT

NEEDS

Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council

of

the City of

Tehachapi at 6:00 p.m.,

on

Tuesday, February 16, 2021, or thereafter, at the Wells Education

Center, 300

S.

Robinson Street, Tehachapi, California, or other location as specified

in

the

agenda, to consider possible unmet transit needs for residents within the City

of

Tehachapi.

All interested persons are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity

to be heard.

Dated:

Posted:

Published: Tehachapi News

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL

January

6,

2021

January

6,

2021

January

13,

2021

PROOF OF PUBLICATION

The TEHACHAPI

NEWS

411

N.

MILL STREET

TEHACHAPI,

CA

933561

Ad Number:

14759168

Edition: CALIFORNIAN

TEHAC

Total Cost $ 45.00

Billing City OfTehachapi

City

Of

Tehachapi

115

S.

Robinson

TEHACHAPI, CA 93561

Address

115

S.

Robinson

TEHACHAPI,CA

93561

ST ATE

OF

CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF

KERN

I

AM

A CITIZEN

OF

THE

UNITED

STATES

AND

A RESIDENT

OF

THE

COUNTY AFORESAID : I

AM

OVER

THE

AGE

OF

EIGHTEEN YEARS, ANO NOT A

PARTY

TO

OR INTERESTED

IN

THE

ABOVE ENTITLED MATIER. I

AM

THE ASSISTANT

PRINCIPAL CLERK OF

THE

PRINTER

OF

THE

TEHACHAPI

NEWS, A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION,

PRINTED AND PUBLISHED

WEEKLY

IN

THE

CITY

OF

TEHACHAPI

COUNTY

OF

KERN,

AND

WIDCH NEWSPAPER

HAS

BEEN

ADJUDGED

A

NEWSPAPER

OF

GENERAL CIRCULATION

BY

THE

SUPERIOR

COURT OF THE COUNTY

OF

KERN,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

THAT

THE

NOTICE,

OF

WHICH

THE

ANNEXED

IS

A PRINTED

COPY,

HAS

BEEN PUBLISHED

IN

EACH REGULAR

AND

ENTIRE ISSUE OF SAID NEWSPAPER

AND

NOT IN ANY SUPPLEMENT TIIBREOF

ON

THE

FOLLOWING

DA

TES,

TO

WIT:

Pub

Dates

13/Jan/21

ALL

IN

YEAR

2021

I CERTIFY (OR

DE

CLA

· )

UNDER

PENAL

TY

OF

PERJURY

THATTiffi

ORE;;;;pj~

DATEDATTEHACHAPI CALIFORNIA

I /;?Id/

I 7

First Text

Unmet

Transit

...

·"

I.

Claimant

Information

Agency:

Mailing Address:

Office Address:

City, State, Zip

Telephone:

I

I.

Contact Person

Name:

Title:

Department:

Mailing Address:

Office Address:

City, State, Zip

Telephone:

FAX:

E-Mail:

WEB

Site:

Kern Council of Governments

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT

PUBLIC TRANSIT CLAIM

2020-2021

PART 1 OF 8 -- CLAIM

AN

T INFORMATION

City of Tehachapi

115 South Robinson Street

Tehachapi, CA 93561

(661) 822-2200

Susan C Wier

Financial Analyst

Finance

115 South Robinson Street

Tehachapi, CA 93561

(661) 822-2200 ext

111

(661) 822-2249

swier@tehachaplcityhall.com

www.liveuptehachapi.com

Kem

Council

of

Governments

TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT

ACT

PUBLIC

TRANSIT

CLAIM

PART 2 OF 8 • CLAIM AND ASSURANCES

For

Flscal

Year

2020-2021

A.

CLAIM:

The

City

of

Tehachapi

hereby

claims

Local

Transportation

Fund

and

State

Transit

Assistance

Fund

apportionments

and

allocations

for

the

2020

-

2021

fiscal

year

plus

all

unencumbered

funds

and/or

deferred

revenues

held

in

its

local

treasury

for

public

transit

uses.

B.

COMPLIANCE

ASSURANCES:

The

City

of

Tehac

h

ap

i

hereby

certifies

that.

as

a

condition

of

receiving

funds

pursuant

to

California

Public

Utilities

Code

Sections

99200,

et.

seq.,

and

California

Code

of

Regulations

Sections

6600,

et.

seq.,

as

amended,

it

shall

ensure

that:

1.

All

funds

will

be

expended

in

compliance

with

the

requirements

of

Callfornla

Public

Utllltles

Code

Sections

99200

through

99408,

California

Code

of

Regulations

Sections

6600

through

6756

and

Kern

Council

of

Governments·

Transportation

Development

Act

Rules

and

Regulations.

2.

All

funds

will

be

expended

In

accordance

with

the

budgets

described

In

Part

6

of

this

claim,

attached

hereto

and

made

a

part

hereof,

by

this

reference.

These

assurances

are

given

In

consideration

of

and

the

for

the

purpose

of

obtaining

any

and

all

funds

apportioned

and

allocated

for

public

transit

purposes

pursuant

to

Public

Utilities

Codes,

Division

10,

Part

11,

Chapter

4

of

the

State

of

California.

The

person

whose

signature

appears

below

has

been

authorized

to

provide

the

assurances

cited

above

and

to

prepare,

submit

and

execute

this

claim

on

behalf

of:

3-

Da

te

City

Manager

Title

C.

FINANCIAL

ASSURANCES:

As

the

chief

financial

officer

of

the

_C_it.._y_o_f

T_e_h_a_c_ha_.p_l

______

_

I

hereby

attest

to

the

reasonableness

and

accuracy

of

the

financial

information

presented

In

this

claim

and

declare

it

to

be

consistent

with

the

uniform

system

of

accounts

and

records

adopted

by

the

Controller

of

the

State

of

California.

~

J/

t1

j

!l()~/

~

1

5"ate

Finance

Director

Title

CLAIMANT:

Kern

Council

of

Governments

PART 3 OF 8--PROJECTED PUBLIC TRANSIT RESOURCES

For

Fiscal

Year

2020-2021

City

of

Tehachapi

I.

FY

2019-2020

PROJECTED

AVAILABLE

RESOURCES

A.

Deferred Revenues --

unexpended

prior year

cash

receipts

held

in

the claimant's

treasury

as

of

June

30,

2020

(from

the

most

recent

audit

report)

B.

Unreserved/Unrestricted

Retained

Earnings

C.

Interest Earnings

--

interest earnings

on

claimant

cash

balances through June

30,

2020

D.

Federal Grants &

Reimbursements

(Source

&

Amount):

1.

FTA

Planning

Assistance

2.

FTA

Operating Assistance

3.

FT

A Capital Assistance

4.

FTA

CARES

ACT

Phase

1

FTA

5311

E.

State Grants &

Reimbursements

(Source &

Amount):

1.

$51,453

$248

$40,261

$44,651

2.-

--------------------------

- -

F.

Local

Cash Grants & Reimbursements

(Source

&

Amount)

1 . L TF--Regional Planning

(PUC

99262)

2. L TF--Operations/Capital

(PUC

99260a)

3. L TF-Capital Reserve Withdrawal

(CCR

6648)

4.

L TF--Social Service Transit

(PUC

99275)

5.

L TF--Contracted/Purchased

Transit

Services

(PUC

99400c)

6.

ST

AF--Operations

(CCR

6730a)

7.

STAF--Capital

(CCR

6730b)

8. STAF-Contracted/Purchased Transit Services

(CCR

6731b)

9. STAF--Social Service Transit

(CCR

6731c)

10

.

County

of

Kern-Service

Contract(s)

11

.

$15,344

$176,328

-----------------------

---

G.

Operating

Revenues:

1.

Passenger

Fares

$5,288

2. Special

Fares

3.

School

Bus

Service

4.

Freight Tariffs

5.

Charters

H.

Other Revenues

(Source

& Amount):

1.

City

of

Tehachapi General

Fund

$20

.

787

2.

_______________________

____

_ _

I.

TOTAL FY 2019-2020

PROJECTED

AVAILABLE

RESOURCES

--

enter

here

and

Part

4,

Line

J (Sections A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H)

$354,360

CLAIMANT:

Kern Council of Governments

PART 4 OF 8--PROJECTED PUBLIC TRANSIT EXPENSES

For Fiscal Year 2020-2021

City of Tehachapi

J. TOTAL FY 2019-2020 PROJECTED AVAILABLE RESOURCES (From Part

3,

Line

I)

II. FY 2019-2020 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES

K.

Personnel:

1.

Administrative Salaries & Wages

2.

Operating Salaries & Wages

3. Other Salaries & Wages

4.

Fringe Benefits

L.

Services & Supplies:

1. Professional Services

2. Maintenance Services

3. Other Services

4. Vehicle Maintenance & Supplies

5. Utilities

6. Insurance

7. Purchased Transportation Services

8.

Miscellaneous

9.

Expense & Inter-fund Transfers

10. Interest

11

. Lease & Rentals

12. Other

M.

Capital Assets (Itemize by Object & Amount):

1.

$354,360

------

$39,233

$14,282

$4,270

$188,549

$147

$14,272

----------------------------

2.

3.

----------------------------

4.

--

-

-------------------------

N.

Other Uses (Object & Amount):

1. Regional Planning Contribution (FY 2019-2020 TOA Schedule

8)

$15,344

2.

----

-

-----------------------

0.

FY 2019-2020 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES (Sections K+L+M+N)

P.

DEFERRED REVENUES AND AVAILABLE RESERVES AS OF JUNE 30,

2020··

enter here and on Line

A,

Part 5 (Sections

J-0)

$276,098

$78,262

CLAIMANT:

Kern Council of Governments

PART 5 OF 8

··

BUDGETED PUBLIC TRANSIT RESOURCES

For Fiscal Year 2020-2021

City of Tehachapi

I.

FY 2020-2021 NONCURRENT TDA & OTHER BUDGETED RESOURCES

$78,262

A. Deferred Revenues & Available Reserves-- unexpended prior year cash

receipts and reserves held in the claimant's treasury as of June

30,

2020 (From

--------

B. Interest Earnings--interest earnings on claimant cash balances through June

30,2021

C. Federal Grants and Reimbursements:

1.

FT A Planning Assistance

2. FT A Operating Assistance

3.

FT

A Capital Assistance

4.

$42,546

--------

-

------

-------------

D. State Grants and Reimbursements (Source/Amount):

1.

--

-

---

----

-

-----

-

---------

2.

-

---

--

-

-----

---

- -

--

-

--------

E.

Non-TOA Local Cash Grants and Reimbursement (Source/Amount):

1.

---------------------

--

-----

2.

----------------------------

3.

F. Operating Revenues:

1. Passenger Fares

2. Special Fares

3.

School Bus Service

4.

Freight Tariffs

5.

Charters

G. Other Revenues (Source/Amount):

1. General Fund

2.

Interest

I.

FY 2020-2021 NONCURRENT TOA & OTHER BUDGETED RESOURCES--

enter here and on Part

6,

Line J (Sections A+B+C+D+E+F+G)

$4,200

$26,589

$388

$151,985

Kern Council of Governments

PART

8.1

OF 8-·SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT INFORMATION

For Fiscal Year 2020-2021

Attach the following documents:

1) A copy of the governing body's authorization to execute and file this claim.

2) A completed copy of the attached questionnaire (BELOW)

on

system characteristics and any additional

documentation required as a result of responding to each query.

3) A listing of all transit service subcontractors (BELOW) and a copy of the contract document, if not previously

submitted.

4) A copy of the "unmet transit needs" documentation, including a legal notice of a public hearing, the minutes

of the public hearing held by the local governing body and a resolution making the appropriate "unmet transit

needs finding".

5) A copy of the Department of California Highway Patrol form number CHP339, "Transit Operator Compliance

Certificate", dated within the past 13 months, documenting participation in the California Department of Motor

Vehicles "Driver Pull Notice Program.

6) Date of the most recent completed annual TOA internal audit: Month: February Day: 5 Year: 2019

FY 19/20 audit underway

Kern

Council of Governments

PART 8.3 OF 8--SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE

For Fiscal Year

2020-2021

Question

YES

(NOTE:

If

the

answer

to

question

11

or

12

is

YES,

PLEASE

SUBMIT A

STATEMENT WHICH DESCRIBES

THE

COMPONENTS

OF

THE

INCREASE/DECREASE

AND

JUSTIFIES

OR

SUBSTANTIATES

THE

CHANGE

.)

n/a

12.

Is

the

claimant proposing

an

increase

in

executive level salaries for

FY

2019-20?

IF

YES,

PLEASE

SUBMIT A STATEMENT

WHICH

DEFINES

AND

JUSTIFIES

THE

INCREASE.

13.

Is

the

claimant precluded

by

contract

from

contracting

with

common

carriers or persons operating under franchise or license ?

14.

Does

the

claimant expect

to

subcontract

with

outside parties for

the

provision

of

operator services

in

FY

2019-20?

IF

YES,

PLEASE

SUBMIT

A

COPY

OF

ALL

NEW

OR

AMENDED

CONTRACTS NOT

PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.

X

15.

Is

the

claimant precluded

by

contract from employing part-time

drivers?

16.

Does

the

claimant routinely staff public transportation vehicles

designed

to

be

operated

by

one

person

with

two or more persons ?

17.

Has

the

claimant's participation

in

the

California Department

of

Motor

Vehicle "Driver

Pull

Notice Program"

been

certified

by

the California

Highway Patrol within the past

13

months?

IF

YES,

PLEASE

SUBMIT

A

COPY

OF

FORM

CHP

339,

"TRANSIT OPERATOR COMPLIANCE

CERTIFICATE".

X

18.

Is

the

claimant's retirement

system

fully funded with respect

to

it's

officers

and

employees ?

19

.

Does

the

claimant have a private pension

plan

?

20.

If

the

answer

to

question

19

is

YES

and the

plan

is

a "defined benefit

plan"

, does

the

claimant

do

each

of

the

following:

n/a

a. Conduct periodic actuarial studies of it's employee pension plans

to

determine the annual cost

of

future pension benefits ?

n/a

b.

Set

aside

and

invest,

on

a current basis, funds sufficient

to

provide for

the

payment of future pension benefits ?

n/a

NO

X

Kern Council of Governments

PART 8.4 OF B

··

SVSTEM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE

For Fiscal Year 2020-2021

LISTING

OF

SUBCONTRACTORS

City of Tehachapi

1.

Kern Transit - Transit Service

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

(NOTE: If the contract is new

or

amended from prior years, please submit a copy.)

CITY

OF

rEHACHAl'l

LEGAL

DEPARTMEl,T

RESOLUTION

NO.

08-21

A

RESOLUTION

OF

THE

CITY

COUNCIL

OF

THE

CITY

OF

TEHACHAPI

FINDING

THAT

THERE

ARE

NO

UNMET

TRANSIT

NEEDS

THAT

ARE

REASONABLE

TO

MEET

WITHIN

THE

CITY.

WHEREAS,

the City of Tehachapi City Council conducted a public hearing on

Tuesday, February 16, 2021, to consider possible unmet transit needs within the

City,

and;

WHEREAS,

the

City

of

Tehachapi currently provides public transportation

service

within the City

of

Tehachapi,

and;

WHEREAS,

the

objectives

of

providing the public transportation system

are

to

meet the public need

for

limited cost transportation,

to

serve

the mobility limited

population, and

to

provide

an

alternative

to

private vehicle transportation.

NOW,

THEREFORE,

BE

IT

RESOLVED

by

the Oty

of

Tehachapi City Council that,

after holding a duly advertised public hearing and receiving public testimony,

it

finds there

are

no

areas

within the City with unmet public transit needs which could be reasonably

met by expansion

of

the existing system

or

establishment

of

a new system.

BE

IT

FURTHER

RESOLVED,

that a copy

of

this resolution

be

transmitted

to

the

Kern

County Council

of

Governments in conjunction with the filing

of

claims

for

Transportation Development Act

Funds

for

Fiscal

Vear

2021-22

and

that

the City Manager

is

authorized

to

execute

s~

'

ict

claims.

PASSED

AND

ADOPTED

by the City Council

of

the City

of

Tehachapi this 16th day

of

February, 2021.

1

CITY

Of

TEHACHAPI

LEGAL

OEPARTMENT

AYES:

NOES:

SMITH,

DAVIES.

POGON-CORD,

SCRIVNER.

WIGGINS

NONE

ABSENT:

NONE

ABSTAIN:

NONE

ATIEST:

Tc---i-

\.

V

lCY

w~

TORI

MARSH,

CMC,

CITY

CLERK

City

of Tehachapi, California

1!!:tt:LL:,

City

of

Tehachapi, California

I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly

adopted

by

the

City Council

of

the

City

of

Tehachapi

at

a regular meeting

thereof

held

on

February 16, 2021

TORI

MARSH,

CMC,

CITY

CLERK

City

of Tehachapi, California

STATE

Of

CAUFORNlh

County

of

Kem)

I,

IOY-,

YY\(l'.l'"Sh..CityClerkoftheCITYOFTEHACHAPI,

State

of

CaUfomla

,

hereby

certlfyr't,e

foregoing

to

be

a

full,

true

andccl'fllCtcopyottheorlglnal

s ,

oS

~,r2,

) onllle

In

lhls

oflloo

and

that

I

havA

compared

the

same

wllh1

.llle

orig

i

nal.

WITNESS

my

hand

and

seal

thi

s

I~

day

of

fe'brv&.,y

,24'-1

• \ •

'I\

f\

~

J.

Citv

Cl11rk

By:

~

I

~

\.LWltX'---

By:

·-·--

DeoutvCilyClerk

CERTIFICATION

OF

EXCERPT

OF

MINUTES

TEHACHAPI

CITY

COUNCIL

February 16, 2021

Upon motion

by

Councllmember Scrivner

and

seconded

by Councilmember Pogon-Cord,

and

carried, the Council affirmed the recommended action on the item

as

follows:

ADOPTED

RESOLUTION

NO.

08-21

FINDING

THAT

THERE

ARE

NO

UNMET

TRANSIT

NEEDS

THAT

ARE

REASONABLE

TO

MEET

WITHIN

THE

CITY

Vote

was

as

follows:

AYES:

SMITH

, DAVI

ES.

POG

ON

-

CO

RD

,

SCRIVNER

, WI

GGINS

NOES:

~N~O_N

"-'-

E- -

-------

-

----------

ABSENT:

C-'

N

-'

O

"""'

N=E

--------------

-

------

ABSTAIN

: =N=O=N=E

---------

-

----------

STATE

OF

CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY

OF

KERN)

I,

TORI

MARSH,

City

Clerk

of

the City

of

Tehachapi,

California, do hereby certify that the foregoing

is

a true and correct excerpt from the minutes

of

the Tehachapi City

Council

meeting held

on

February 16, 2021.

DATED:

February 18, 2021

TEHACHAPI

CITY

COUNCIL

--=i

~v

~

Tori Marsh,

CMC,

City

Clerk

City

of

Tehachapi

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

COMMUNITY TRANSIT NEEDS

Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council

of

the City

of

Tehachapi at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, February 16, 2021, or thereafter, at the Wells Education

Center, 300 S. Robinson Street, Tehachapi, California, or other location as specified

in

the

agenda,

to

consider possible unmet transit needs for residents within the City

of

Tehachapi.

All interested persons are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given

an

opportunity

to be heard.

Dated:

Posted:

Published: Tehachapi News

TEHACHAPI CITY COUNCIL

January 6,

2021

January 6, 2021

January 13,

2021

PROOF OF PUBLICATION

Ad Number:

14759168

The

TEHACHAPI

NEWS

411

N.

MILL

STREET

TEHACHAPI,

CA

933561

Edition: CALIFORNIAN

TEHAC

Total Cost $ 45.00

Billing City OfTehachapi

City

Of

Tehachapi

115

S.

Robinson

TEHACHAPI,

CA

93561

Address

115

S.

Robinson

TEHACHAPI.CA 93561

ST

ATE

OF

CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF KERN

I

AM

A CITIZEN

OF

THE

UNITED

STATES

AND

A RESIDENT

OF

THE

COUNTY AFORESAID : I

AM

OVER

THE

AGE

OF

EIGHTEEN YEARS, AND NOT A

PARTY

TO OR INTERESTED

IN

THE ABOVE ENTITLED MATIER. I

AM

THE

ASSISTANT

PRINCIPAL CLERK

OF

THE PRINTER

OF

THE

TEHACHAPI

NEWS,

A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION,

PRINTED

AND

PUBLISHED WEEKLY

IN

THE

CITY

OF

TEHACHAPI COUNTY OF KERN,

AND WHICH NEWSPAPER

HAS

BEEN

ADJUDGED

A

NEWSPAPER

OF

GENERAL

CIRCULATION

BY

THE

SUPERIOR

COURT

OF

THE

COUNTY

OF

KERN

, STATE

OF

CALIFORNrA ,

THAT THE NOTICE , OF

WHICH

THE ANNEXED

IS

A PRINTED

COPY,

HAS

BEEN PUBLISHED

IN

EACH

REGULAR

AND

ENTIRE ISSUE

OF

SAID

NEWSPAPER

AND

NOT IN ANY SUPPLEMENT THEREOF

ON

THE

FOLLOWING

DATES

,

TOWIT

:

rub Dntcs

13/Jen/21

ALL

IN

YEAR

2021

I CERTIFY (OR DE

LAI~

) UNDER

PENAL

TY

OF

PERJURY

lllATTHE

ro

..

ar

s

TRUTIORR

EC

T

.,

YM/~tz!&u:.J

DATED

AT

TEHACHAPI CALIFORN

IA

I /;?Id/

I )

First Text

Unmet

Transit

.

ND'MUfPU

mtACtlAPl.~L

.

iums"

. ·

STATE

OF

CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT

OF

CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY

PATROL

TRANSIT OPERATOR COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

CHP

339

(Rev. 9-09)

OPI

062

TRANSIT

OPERA

TOR

NAME

National Express Transit Corporation

ADDRESS

5438 Victor Street

CITY

Bakersfield

ELEPHONE

NUMBER

(661) 391-9514

ZI

P

CODE

COUNTY

93308 Kern

This is to certi

fy

that the above named transit operator was inspected

on

this date and found

to

be

in

compliance with California

Veh

icle Code Secti

on

1808.

1,

regarding participation

in

the Department

of

Motor Vehicles Pull Notice Program, and with Section 12804.

6,

regarding transit bus operator

certificates.

ISSUED

BY

J.

Followill

Destroy

Previous Editions

STATE

OF

CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT

OF

CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY

PATROL

TRANSIT OPERA TOR COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

CHP

339

(Rev. 9-09)

OPI

062

TRANSIT

OPERATOR

NAME

National Express Transit Corporation

ADDRESS

5438 Victor Street

CI

TY

Bakersfield

ZIP

CODE

COUNTY

93308 Kern

I.D

NUMBER

DATE

A12578 01/29/2021

Chp339_0B09 pdf

TELEPHONE

NUMBER

(661) 391-9514

This

Is

to

certify that the above named transit operator was inspected on this date and found

to

be

in

compliance with California Vehicle Code Section

1808.1, regarding participation

in

the Department

of

Motor Vehicles Pull Notice Program, and with Section 12804.

6,

regarding transit bus operator

certificates.

ISSUED

BY

J.

FoJlowill

Destroy Previous Editions

STATE

OF

CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT

OF

CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY

PATROL

TRANSIT OPERA TOR COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

CHP

339

(Rev. 9-09)

OPI

062

TRANSIT

OPERA

TOR

NAME

National Express Transit Corporation

ADORES$

5438

Victor

Street

crrv

Bakersfield

ZIP

CODE

COUNTY

93308 Kern

I.

D

NUMBEJl

DATE

A12578 01/29/2021

Chp339_0809

pdf

TE

L

EPHONE

NUMBER

(66

1)

391-9514

This is to certify that the above named transit operator was inspected

on

this date and found

to

be

in

compliance with California Vehicle Code Secti

on

1808.1, regarding participation in the Department

of

Motor Vehicles Pull Notice Program, and with Section 12804.6, regarding transit bus operator

certificates.

ISSUEOBY

ID.

NUMBER

DATE

·

J.

Followill

Al2578

01/29/2021

Destroy Previous Editions

Chp339_0B09.

pdf

Operator's

STA

Qualifying Criteria (99314.6) - Worksheet

FISCAL

YEAR

FY2016/17

FY

2017/18

FY

2018/19

(Audited Data)

A.

Operating Cost

$224,557.00 $262,565.00 $273,718.00

B.

Operating Cost Exclusions:

Fuel

$7,185.00 $9,202.00 $10,553.00

Insurance $6,678.00

$12,478.00 $13,619.00

Depreciation $3,209.00

$4,894.00

$3,585.00

C.

Adjusted Operating Cost (A-B) $207,485.00 $235,991.00

$245,961.00

D.

Revenue Vehicle Hours

(RVH)

2149 2207

2205

E.

RVH

Exclusions:

(add sheets

if

required)

F.

Adjusted

RHV

(D-E)

2149 2207 2205

G.

Operating Cost per

RVH

(C/F) $96.55 $106.93

$111.55

I.

Operating Cost per

RVH

$96.551 $106.931

s111.5sl I

w X V

H.

% Change in

CPI

--

% Change in

CPI

3

prior

years

7.90%

--

(change

in

annual

CPI

between first year

of

first fiscal year

and

last year

of

last

fiscal

year)

Efficiency

Standard

1:

Z must be less

than

or

equal

to

{Y)*(CPI%) [CPI%= average percentage change in

the

CPI%]

Efficiency

Standard

2:

Z =

Y=

$107.28 Difference:

$112.89 Percentage:

[(X + Y +

Z)

/ 3] must

be

less

than

or

equal

to

[(W + X + Y)/3] (3-year

CPI%)

[(X

+ Y +

Z)

/ 3]

=

108.5861621

Difference:

[(W

+ X +

Y)

/ 3]

=

105.0083021 Percentage:

[(W

+ X +

Y)

/ 3] +

[(W

+ X +

Y)

/ 3]•CPI

=

113.303958

For

RTPA

Use

Only

Operator

qualifies under:

Standard 1:

D

Yes

0 No

Standard 2:

D

Yes

0 No

-$5.60

-4.96%

-$4.72

-4.16%

FY

2019/20

$260,754.00

$10,489.00

$9,610.00

$2,701.00

$237,954.00

2218

$107.28

$107.281

z

1.20%

OPERATOR

PERFORMANCE

TABLE

Performance

Indicator

Comments

1

Operating

Cost/Passenger

Trip

260,753.98

/

4384.5

=

59.47

2

Operating

Cost/Service

Hour

260,753.98

/

2217.8

=

117.57

3

Passenger/Service

Hour

4384.5

/

2217

.8 =

1.98

4

Passengers/Service

Mile

4384.5

/

15,007.0

=

.29

5

Service

Hours/Employee

2217.8/6

=

369.63

19-20

City

of

Tehachapi

FTE

=

.45

19-20

Kern

Transit

FTE

=

5.5

19-20

TOTAL

FTE

= 6

6

Farebox

Ratio

10%

with

General

Fund

subsidy

2.03%

without

General

Fund

subsidy

Kern Council of Governments

Transportation Development Act -- "Schedule A"

LTF STAF FUND ESTIMATE AND APPORTIONMENT FACTORS

FY 2020/21

Revised: February 16, 2021

Prospective POPULATION

POPULATION

L.T.F. S.T.A.F. S.T.A.F. S.T.A.F. TOTAL

Claimant BASIS RATIO POPULATION POPULATION REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE

APPORTIONMENT

01/01/20 APPORTIONMENT

APPORTIONMENT

BASIS RATIO APPORTIONMENT

ARVIN 21,677 2.36% 843,528.96$ 149,660.23$ 62,152 0.77% 2,997.00$ 996,186.19$

BAKERSFIELD (1) 392,756 42.80% 14,519,352.65$ 2,711,627.70$ 0 0.00% -$ 17,230,980.35$

CALIFORNIA CITY 14,161 1.54% 551,054.74$ 97,769.00$ 25,760 0.32% 1,242.00$ 650,065.74$

DELANO 53,032 5.78% 2,063,663.23$ 366,138.37$ 279,451 3.45% 13,474.00$ 2,443,275.60$

GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANS (1) N/A 0.00% -$ -$ 5,882,508 72.68% 283,636.00$ 283,636.00$

MARICOPA 1,127 0.12% 43,855.57$ 7,780.92$ 0 0.00% -$ 51,636.49$

MCFARLAND 14,388 1.57% 559,888.12$ 99,336.23$ 12,106 0.15% 585.00$ 659,809.34$

RIDGECREST 29,350 3.20% 1,142,112.61$ 202,635.41$ 159,250 1.97% 7,679.00$ 1,352,427.02$

SHAFTER 20,441 2.23% 795,431.82$ 141,126.76$ 57,568 0.71% 2,776.00$ 939,334.58$

TAFT 8,680 0.95% 337,769.59$ 59,927.61$ 360,169 4.45% 17,366.00$ 415,063.20$

TEHACHAPI 12,758 1.39% 496,459.03$ 88,082.54$ 28,252 0.35% 1,362.00$ 585,903.57$

WASCO 28,884

3.15% 1,123,978.89$ 199,418.10$ 31,839 0.39% 1,535.00$ 1,324,931.99$

KERN CO.-IN (1) 112,572 12.27% 4,161,543.15$ 777,207.91$ 0 0.00% -$ 4,938,751.06$

KERN CO.-OUT 207,727 22.64% 8,083,398.48$ 1,434,169.23$ 1,194,767 14.76% 57,608.00$ 9,575,175.72$

METRO-BAKERSFIELD CTSA N/A N/A 983,205.04$ -$ 0 0.00% -$ 983,205.04$

TOTALS 917,553 100.00% 35,705,241.88$ 6,334,880.00$ 8,093,822 100.00% 390,260.00$ 42,430,381.88$

PROOF 917,553 100.00% 35,705,241.88$ 6,334,880.00$ 8,093,822 100.00% 390,260.00$ 42,430,381.88$

KERN COG ADMINISTRATION

N/A 1.00% 379,401.44$ -$ N/A -$ 379,401.44$

KERN PEDESTRIAN/BIKEWAY

N/A 2.00% 751,214.85$ -$ N/A -$ 751,214.85$

KERN COG PLANNING (2) N/A 3.00% 1,104,285.83$ -$ N/A -$ 1,104,285.83$

ESTIMATED TOTAL N/A 37,940,144.00$ -$ N/A -$ 44,665,284.00$

37,940,144.00$

N O T E S:

(1) THE GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANSIT DISTRICT RETAINS CLAIMANT PRIORITY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND KERN-IN FUNDS.

THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND COUNTY OF KERN SHALL FUND 77.69% AND 22.31% OF GET'S CLAIM, RESPECTIVELY.

(2) PURSUANT TO P.U.C. SECTION 99262, CLAIMANTS MAY DESIGNATE FUNDING FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING PROCESS.

SEE SCHEDULE "B" FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS AMOUNT BY AREA OF APPORTIONMENT.

Kern Council of Governments

Transportation Development Act -- "Schedule A"

LTF STAF FUND ESTIMATE AND APPORTIONMENT FACTORS

FY 2020/21

From FY 2020/2

% Calc

111,766 35.1%

206,240 64.9%

Kern Council of Governments

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT

SCHEDULE "B"

PLANNING CONTRIBUTIONS BY AREA OF APPORTIONMENT

Fiscal Year 2021-2022

Revised: February 12.2021

Prospective POPULATION POPULATION PLANNING

Claimant BASIS RATIO CONTRIBUTION

at 01/01/19

ARVIN 21,677 2.36% 27,077$

CALIFORNIA CITY 14,161 1.54% 17,688$

DELANO 53,032 5.78% 66,242$

GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANSIT 505,328 55.07% 631,201$

MARICOPA 1,127 0.12% 1,408$

MCFARLAND 14,388 1.57% 17,972$

RIDGECREST 29,350 3.20% 36,661$

SHAFTER 20,441 2.23% 25,533$

TAFT 8,680 0.95% 10,842$

TEHACHAPI 12,758 1.39% 15,936$

WASCO 28,884 3.15% 36,079$

KERN TRANSIT 207,727 22.64% 259,470$

- - -

TOTALS 917,553 100.00% 1,146,108$

PROOF 917,553 100.00% 1,146,108$

f

Eastern Kern

March 31, 2021

TO: Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI,

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Joseph Stramaglia,

Project Delivery Team Lead

SUBJECT: TTAC AGENDA ITERM: VI.

KCOG PROJECT DELIVERY POLICY AND PROCEDURES UPDATE

DESCRIPTION:

The KCOG Project Delivery Policy and Procedures document (Policy) will be updated to require the annual status

reporting of TDA Article 3 projects not yet advanced.

DISCUSSION:

Last November, interest was expressed by the TTAC Chair and others, to add additional reporting requirements for

the Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 project delivery, concurrent with the requirement already in place

for CMAQ and RSTP project delivery. The current Policy requires agencies to submit a letter to Kern COG explaining

why they are late in submitting a federal-aid authorization request to Caltrans when not accomplished by the end of

January. Each year, Kern COG staff requests project delivery letters be submitted in January for presentation to the

TTAC and Board in February.

Kern COG staff updated the current Policy to require the submittal of a status letter in January for TDA Article 3

projects that have not yet been delivered. Kern COG staff currently conducts quarterly Project Accountability Team

meetings each year to ensure that programmed projects are advancing in a timely manner in order to not lose federal

funding to the region. During these meetings, TDA Article 3 funded projects are listed and discussed and the reporting

of non-activity for TDA Article 3 projects in January of each year will provide transparency to the Board. TDA Article

3 is a discretionary program; projects are ranked and prioritized based on merit.

Staff circulated the draft Policy update to TTAC and Kern COG Board in February as an information item. Comments

were received regarding project phasing which was addressed in the updated policy. Kern COG staff requests that

the TTAC recommend that the Transportation Planning and Policy Committee approve the proposed policy update

to the KCOG Project Selection Policy and Procedures document, as provided in Attachment A.

Action: Recommend that the Transportation Planning and Policy Committee approve the Final KCOG Project

Selection Policy and Procedures update.

Attachment A: Final KCOG Project Selection policy and Procedures Update

VI.

TTAC

Kern Council of Governments

PROJECT DELIVERY

POLICIES & PROCEDURES

FINAL

Approved by Kern COG on November 15, 2012

Updated November 2013 – Chapter 2

Updated April 2014 – Chapter 6

Updated March 2015 – Chapter 7

Updated April 2015 – Chapter 6

Updated November 2016 – Chapter 5 & Appendix B

Updated March 2019 – Chapter 1, 2, 3

Updated March 2021 – Chapter 2

Formatted: Font: 14 pt

The Kern Council of Governments is the regional planning agency as well as the technical and

informational resource, and ride share administrator for the area's 11 incorporated cities and the

County of Kern. Following Board direction, staff coordinates between local, state, and federal

agencies to avoid overlap or duplication of programs. This intergovernmental coordination

enables staff to work with many public agencies to ensure that planning and implementation of

programs proceed in a coordinated manner.

Kern Council of Governments Board of Directors

Secretary/ Executive Director

Ahron Hakimi

City of Arvin

Jose Gurrola, Jr

City of Bakersfield

Bob Smith, Vice-Chair

City of California City

Nick Lessenevitch

City of Delano

Grace Vallejo

City of Maricopa

Virgil Bell

City of McFarland

Manuel Cantu

City of Ridgecrest

Mike Mower

City of Shafter

Gilbert Alvarado

City of Taft

Orchel Krier

City of Tehachapi

Philip Smith

City of Wasco

Gilberto Reyna

County of Kern

David Couch

County of Kern

Zack Scrivner, Vice-Chair

Ex-Officio Members:

Joint Planning Policy Board

Scott Kiernan

Caltrans District 6

Gail MillerMichael Navarro

Caltrans District 9

Brent GreenRyan Dermody

Golden Empire Transit District

Cindy Para

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-1

Kern Council of Governments

CHAPTER 2

IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES OVERVIEW

Background……………………………………………………………………………….... 2-1

Project Delivery Policy and Timeline .............................................. 2-2

Figure 2-A: Project Delivery Timeline……………………………….... 2-3

Implementation Procedures........................................................... 2-4

General Policy ……………………………………………………………………………… 2-4

Project Cost Savings/Reductions in Scope/Project Failures 2-5

Project Advances………………………………………………………………. 2-5

Specific Policy Provisions…………………………………………………… 2-5

Encumbrance/Liquidation/Project Close-Out Deadlines....... 2-7

Inactive Projects………………………………………………………………… 2-8

Background

On December 4, 2015, President Obama signed into law Public Law 114-94, the Fixing America’s

Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). The FAST Act funds surface transportation programs—

including, but not limited to, Federal-aid highways—at over $305 billion for fiscal years (FY) 2016

through 2020. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration

(FTA) administer the policies and programs of the FAST Act. The Moving Ahead for Progress in

the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), enacted in 2012, included provisions to make the Federal surface

transportation more streamlined, performance-based, and multimodal, and to address

challenges facing the U.S. transportation system, including improving safety, maintaining

infrastructure condition, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency of the system and

freight movement, protecting the environment, and reducing delays in project delivery. The FAST

Act builds on the changes made by MAP-21 and continues both the Regional Surface

Transportation Program (RSTP) and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) programs with the

same flexibility to fund road (including road rehabilitation), pedestrian, bicycle, and transit

projects. The federal Transportation Alternatives Program is included and has been transformed

into the state Active Transportation Program (ATP) in California.

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-2

Kern Council of Governments

Federal Requirements (FAST ACT) - STP, CMAQ, and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds

(among other programs) must be obligated within 4 years of apportionment. Funds not obligated

are lost to the state.

State Requirements (AB-1012) - RSTP and CMAQ funds must be obligated within 3 years of

apportionment. Funds not obligated are lost to the region.

Regional Requirements - KCOG requires regional deadline requirements, including obligation,

award and invoicing deadlines, to expedite project delivery and ensure funds are not lost to the

region.

Project Delivery Policy and Timeline

The RSTP, CMAQ and ATP programs, as well as other state and federal funds, are subject to

regional project delivery policies. These policies are critical to ensure that the region is able to

use its state and federally apportioned transportation funding in a timely manner. By meeting

delivery targets, the region is able to maximize its use of federal all funding on transportation

projects. In addition, if the region is successful in meeting state mandated delivery deadlines, it

may be rewarded with more transportation dollars.

State Legislation (AB-1012) established penalties for not delivering RSTP or CMAQ and other

federal-aid projects within prescribed deadlines. KCOG, working with its partners, has imposed

its own deadlines to ensure funds are not lost to the region. These delivery deadlines at the

federal, state and regional levels are outlined below.

KCOG has established these deadlines for funding in the RSTP and CMAQ Programs to ensure

timely project delivery against state and federal funding deadlines. This policy establishes rules

for enforcing project deadlines for these funds under the MAP-21 transportation authorization

act. Key policy elements include:

•

Obligation requests shall be submitted to Caltrans Local Assistance by February 1 of the year

the funds are programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP);

•

Funds shall be obligated by March 31 of the year programmed in the FTIP;

•

The agency shall execute and return the Program Supplement Agreement (PSA) to Caltrans

within 60 days of receiving the PSA from Caltrans;

•

Once obligated, funds shall be invoiced against at least once every six months;

•

For funds contracted out, a contract shall be awarded within 6 months of obligation;

•

Projects shall be closed out within six months of final invoice.

Projects that do not meet these deadlines are subject to review and possible deprogramming by

KCOG, or de-obligation by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). There is no guarantee

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-3

Kern Council of Governments

that funds are available once deprogrammed or de-obligated. The intent of this regional delivery

policy is to ensure implementing agencies do not lose any funds because of a deadline and to

provide maximum flexibility in solving potential problems in good faith. Figure 2-A on the next

page summarizes the reporting procedures for implementation by KCOG staff to monitor and

identify projects that fall behind schedule.

The Transportation Development Act (TDA) Program Article 3 Program is incorporated by

reference, into Figure 2-A with regards to the delivery of regionally approved improvements. TDA

Article 3 projects are subject to the requirement to submit a letter to Kern COG during the Kern

COG policies and procedures for the TDA program as described in Chapter 7 of this document.

Chapter 7 reflects the established and required process for the Article 3 program project

selection and delivery process which is a sub-set of the entire TDA program. Approved Article 3

projects are to be included and discussed at the quarterly project accountability team meetings.

Anticipated phased or larger projects may be exempt from the annual status letter when Kern

COG ismade aware through the call for projects process and written notice that the project is

under consideration for a future allocation. However, once a project is identified in an adopted

Program of Projects, that project will be subject to the timely use of funds provision. Additionally,

a time limit is already established and described in Chapter 7 of this document to advance TDA

Article 3 projects that receive funding approval through Kern COG. That policy is repeated below:

Time Limitation - Projects approved for funding in one fiscal year shall be

considered void if construction is not started by the end of the following fiscal year.

Funds allocated within the Local Transportation Fund and those disbursed to a

claimant's local treasury shall then be returned or refunded to the unallocated

pedestrian/bikeway reserve account for reallocation during the next program

funding cycle.

Formatted: Highlight

Formatted: Font: Bold, Italic, Highlight

Formatted: Font: Italic, Highlight

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-4

Kern Council of Governments

FIGURE 2-A: PROJECT DELIVERY TIMELINE

FFY Oct 1 to Sep 30

Description of Action Required

FOR PROJECTS NOT YET APPROVED FOR E-76 IN SAME YEAR AS PROGRAMMING YEAR

October 1 to January 1

Project Lead ready to submit Request for Authorization to CT Office of Local Assistance (OLA )

January 1 to January 31

Lead agency submits Request for Authorization to CT OLA

February 1 to February 30

Lead agency reports in writing to KCOG / TTAC / TPPC on revised submittal schedule

March 1 to March 31

Lead agency to receive authorization to proceed (E-76) from Caltrans OLA

March 1 to March 31

KCOG develops and submits action plan to project delivery team and KCOG Board

April 1 to June 30

KCOG Project Delivery Team to follow up on delivery commitments and agree on action plan for Board

consideration including the acceleration of other programmed projects and replacement proposals

Important Note: Formal FTIP amendments are no longer available at predictable points in time due to air quality conformity requirements and

federal financial constraint programming limitations. Project replacement solutions involving formal amendments require more time than what

remains in a given federal fiscal year. Projects proposed for acceleration should rely on the “Expedited Project Selection Procedure” process,

already in place, which allows for project delivery within the federal triennial element of the FTIP.

FOR PROJECTS WITH APPROVED E-76 BUT NO CONTRACT AWARDED WITHIN 90-DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING E-76

No Activity for 6 mo.

Agency Letter to Caltrans Office of Local Assistance and copy to KCOG

No Activity for 12 mo.

Subject to Caltrans inactive Invoice Review and Action

No response beyond 12 mo.

Subject to FHWA de-obligation after 12 months of inactivity

FOR PROJECTS WITH APPROVED E-76, AWARDED, STARTED BUT NO INVOICING ACTIVITY FOR MORE THAN 6 MONTHS

No Activity for 6 mo.

Lead Agency letter to Caltrans Office of Local Assistance and copy to KCOG

No Activity for 12 mo.

Subject to Caltrans inactive Invoice Review and Action

No activity beyond 12 mo.

Subject to FHWA de-obligation after 12 months of inactivity

FOR PROJECTS WITH APPROVED E-76, CONTRACT AWARDED, WORK COMPLETED - BUT NO FINAL REPORT

No Activity for 3 mos. or more

Agency Letter to KCOG

Important Note: The final report phase is necessary to close out the reimbursement account. Non-compliance to comply with final report deadlines

may result in the state requesting full reimbursement for the obligated phase. Funding already encumbered would be lost both to the region and

to the state.

FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CTC ALLOCATION VOTES

This process must occur in same year as programmed – Projects using RIP, IIP or ATP are subject to CTC allocation votes as outlined in the CTC

approved STIP Guidelines. ATP projects are included in this category. Procedures above should include the additional reporting to both KCOG

and the CTC as specified below.

No CTC vote request by March 1

Submit request for extension

No contract award for 6 mos.

Submit request for extension

POST - FTIP ADJUSTMENTS –PROJECTS WITH UNUSED PROGRAMMING OR IN NEED OF ADDITIONAL REIMBURSEMENT

All post FTIP adjustments are at the discretion of the Caltrans Office of Local Assistance or Federal Transit Administration.

First priority for post FTIP adjustments –The implementing agency should first try to use or manage variations in cost.

Second priority for post FTIP adjustments – Notify TTAC members and project delivery staff of availability of obligation authority from an

encumbered project ready for final invoicing and project closeout.

All post FTIP adjustments are subject to procedural limitations set by the Caltrans Office of Local Assistance, Federal Transit Administration and

the Federal Highways Administration.

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-5

Kern Council of Governments

Implementation Procedures

KCOG staff regularly reports to the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) and

Transportation Planning and Policy Committee (TPPC) on an annual basis of project delivery

status for all projects identified in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program.

Communication of project status requires the active participation of project managers and KCOG

staff on a regular basis. In order to effectively administrate this project delivery policy, there is a

need to gather project delivery information on a quarterly or possibly a monthly (ongoing) basis.

To that end, KCOG staff shall develop a database application that supports a checklist and date

completed database for all active federal-aid projects. This database will house analysis data;

deadline information for use in comparing target dates to actual dates indicated for project

delivery accomplishments. Should there be ongoing issues with the advancement of a project,

KCOG staff will advise the TTAC and the TPPC of the issues surrounding project delays, require

additional written information on the status and commitments from the implementing agency

and whether there is an opportunity to redirect programming to another project. Directing the

attention of the TTAC and TPPC to projects that have fallen behind will increase lead agency

accountability and improve project delivery countywide.

General Policy

KCOG has established deadlines for funding in the RSTP, CMAQ, Active Transportation Program

(ATP) and other federal-aid transportation programs to ensure timely project delivery against

state and federal funding deadlines. This document establishes a regional policy for enforcing

project funding deadlines and project substitutions for these state and federal funds.

Projects in each federal-aid program are chosen based on eligibility, project merit, and

deliverability within the established deadlines. It is the responsibility of the implementing agency

at the time of programming, to ensure that regional deadlines and provisions of the project

delivery policy can be met. KCOG staff will actively monitor and report the obligation status of

projects to the TTAC and TPPC. KCOG staff will monitor project delivery and report issues as they

arise and make recommendations to the TTAC and TPPC as necessary.

KCOG and the implementing agency or partnering agencies may determine that circumstances

may justify changes to project programming as reflected in the currently approved TIP. These

revisions, or amendments, are not routine. KCOG staff reviews all amendment proposals before

the KCOG Board considers any formal actions on program amendments. All changes must follow

KCOG’s Public Involvement Process and Federal Air Quality Procedures and Conformity Protocol.

Changes must be consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), must not adversely

affect the expeditious implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs), must not

negatively impact the deliverability of other projects in the regional programs, and must not

affect the conformity finding in the FTIP.

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-6

Kern Council of Governments

In selecting projects to receive redirected funding, the KCOG Board may use existing lists of

projects that did not receive funding in past programming exercises, or direct the funds to

agencies with proven on-time project delivery, or could identify other projects with merit to

receive the funding, or retain the funding for future programming cycles. The KCOG Board will

make final decisions regarding the reprogramming of available funds based on KCOG staff

recommendations, or the recommendation of the Executive Director or the recommendations of

the TTAC.

Project Cost Savings/Reductions in Scope/Project Failures

From time to time projects may be completed at a lower cost than anticipated, or have a minor

reduction in scope resulting in a lower project cost, or may not proceed to implementation. In

such circumstances, the implementing agency shall notify KCOG and Caltrans within a timely

manner, that the funds resulting from these ‘project savings’ will not be used. Project savings

accrued prior to the established obligation deadline may be available for redirection within the

program of origin. Savings within the formula based programs, such as county guaranteed

funding returned to counties based on a population share, may be available for redirection by

KCOG within the formula program. For all programs, the projects using the redirected savings

prior to the obligation deadline must still obligate the funds within the original deadline. Project

savings or unused funding realized after the obligation deadline return to KCOG. Any funds that

have been obligated but remain unused will be de-obligated from the project and returned to

the KCOG Board for redirection.

Project Advances

Obligations for funds advanced from future years of the FTIP will be permitted only upon the

availability of surplus Obligation Authority (OA) and State Budget Authority (SBA) in a particular

year, with current programmed projects that have met the delivery deadlines having priority for

OA in a given year. Advanced obligations will be based on the availability of OA and will only be

considered between May 1 and August 15 of each year. Obligation requests for surplus OA funds

must be submitted no later than June 30; however, requests submitted by May 1

st

have a better

chance of being obligated. Implementing agencies wishing to advance projects may instead

request Advance Construction (AC) authorization from Caltrans (or pre-award authority from the

FTA) to proceed with the project using local funds until OA becomes available.

Specific Policy Provisions

Projects selected to receive RSTP or CMAQ funding must have a demonstrated ability to use the

funds within the established regional, state and federal deadlines. This criterion will be used for

selecting projects for funding, and for placement of funding in a particular year of the FTIP. It is

the responsibility of the implementing agency to ensure the funds can be used within the

established regional, state and federal deadlines and that the provisions of the regional delivery

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-7

Kern Council of Governments

policy can be met. It is also the responsibility of the implementing agency to continuously monitor

the progress of the programmed funds against regional, state and federal deadlines, and to

report any potential difficulties in meeting these deadlines, (or difficulties in meeting the

provisions of the regional delivery policy) to KCOG, Caltrans and partnering agencies within a

timely manner, to seek solutions to potential problems well in advance of potential delivery

failure or permanent loss of funding. Specific provisions of the Project Delivery Policies and

Procedures are as follow:

•

Funds to be Obligated/Transferred in the Fiscal Year Programmed in the FTIP: RSTP and

CMAQ funds are to be programmed, up to the apportionment level for that fiscal year, in the

FTIP within the fiscal year in which the funds are to be obligated by FHWA or transferred to

FTA, similar to the programming of the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP.)

This will improve the overall management of federal OA within the region and improve the

likelihood that OA and SBA will be available for projects that are programmed in a particular

fiscal year.

•

Field Reviews: Implementing agencies are required to request a field review within 6 months

of KCOG’s approval of the project in the FTIP for federal-aid projects receiving funding

through the RSTP and CMAQ programs that are subject to AB-1012 or regional obligation

deadlines. This policy also applies to federal-aid projects in the STIP. The requirement does

not apply to projects for which a field review would not be applicable (such as FTA transfers,

regional customer service projects and planning activities). Failure for an implementing

agency to make a good-faith effort in scheduling and/or obtaining a field review from Caltrans

Local Assistance within six months of programming into the FTIP may result in the funding

being subject to reprogramming.

•

Complete Environmental Submittal to Caltrans 12 months prior to Obligation Deadline:

Implementing agencies are required to submit a complete environmental package to Caltrans

for all projects (except those determined Programmatic Categorical Exemption as determined

by Caltrans at the field review), twelve months prior to the obligation deadline for right of

way or construction funds. This policy creates a more realistic period for projects to progress

from the field review through the environmental and design process, to the right of way or

construction phase. If the environmental process, as determined at the field review, will take

longer than 12 months before obligation, the implementing agency is responsible for

delivering the complete environmental submittal in a timely manner. Failure to comply with

this provision could result in the funding being subject to reprogramming. The requirement

does not apply to FTA transfers, regional customer service projects or planning activities.

•

Obligation/Submittal Deadlines: Projects selected to receive RSTP, CMAQ and ATP funding

must demonstrate their ability to obligate programmed funds by the established obligation

deadline. Implementing agencies are responsible for delivering projects in the programming

year of the TIP based on their original year requested. The implementing agency is

responsible for meeting benchmark delivery deadlines.

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-8

Kern Council of Governments

Within KCOG-administered programs, implementing agencies may adjust programming up until

April 1

st

of the programmed year, swapping funds to a ready project in order to utilize all of the

programming capacity, subject to available OA. The substituted project(s) must still obligate the

funds within the original funding deadline.

RSTP, CMAQ and ATP funds programmed in the FTIP are subject to an obligation/FTA transfer

deadline of June 30 of the programmed fiscal year. Implementing agencies are required to submit

the complete request for obligation or FTA transfer to Caltrans Local Assistance by April 1 of the

fiscal year programmed in the FTIP, and receive an obligation/FTA transfer of the funds by June

30 the fiscal year programmed in the FTIP.

February 1 - Regional Submittal Deadline: Complete package submittals received by February 1

of the fiscal year programmed in the FTIP will receive first priority for obligations against available

OA.

February 2 - April 30: Projects submitted during this timeframe are subject to deprogramming.

If OA is still available, these projects may receive OA if obligated by April 30. If OA is limited, these

projects would compete for OA with projects advanced from the following fiscal year on a first

come-first serve basis. Projects with funds to be advanced from future years must request the

advance prior to April 30, in order to receive the funds within that federal fiscal year.

April 30 - Regional Obligation Deadline: Funds not obligated (or transferred to FTA) by April 30

of the fiscal year programmed in the FTIP will be returned to KCOG for reprogramming. No

extensions of this deadline will be granted. Projects seeking advanced obligations against funds

from future years, must request the advance prior to April 30, in order to receive the funds within

that federal fiscal year. The obligation deadline may not be extended. The funds must be

obligated by the established deadline or they will be de-programmed from the project and

redirected by KCOG to a project that can use the funds in a timely manner.

Encumbrance/Liquidation/Project Close-Out Deadlines

RSTP, CMAQ and ATP funds must be encumbered by an approved State funding agreement within

one state fiscal year after the fiscal year of obligation. Furthermore, the funds must be fully

liquidated (expended, invoiced and reimbursed), within four state fiscal years after the fiscal year

in which the funds were obligated, and the project must be accepted and closed out within five

state fiscal years after the fiscal year in which the funds were obligated. The provisions listed

below are required in order to ensure no funds are lost after obligation. Failure to meet these

requirements will result in the potential loss of funding for reimbursement of incurred project

costs.

•

Funds must be encumbered within one state fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the

funds were obligated (encumbrance is approval of a funding agreement with the state). This

requirement does not apply to FTA transfers.

Chapter 2: Implementation Procedures Overview

PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2-9

Kern Council of Governments

•

Construction/Equipment Purchase contract must be awarded within six months following the

fiscal year in which the construction funds were obligated (this requirement does not apply

to FTA transfers).

•

Funds must be liquidated (expended, invoiced and reimbursed) within four state fiscal years

following the fiscal year in which the funds were obligated (this requirement does not apply

to FTA transfers).

•

Project must be accepted and closed out within six months of the last expenditure, or within

five state fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the funds were obligated, whichever

occurs first (this requirement does not apply to FTA transfers).

•

For FTA projects, funds must be approved/awarded in an FTA Grant within one state fiscal

year following the fiscal year in which the funds were transferred to FTA.

Funds that miss the encumbrance, liquidation/project close out deadlines are subject to de-

obligation if not re-appropriated by the State Legislature, or extended (for one year) in a

Cooperative Work Agreement (CWA) with the California Department of Finance.

Inactive Projects

Most projects can be completed well within the state’s seven-year deadline for project closeout.

Yet it is viewed negatively by both FHWA and the California Department of Finance for projects

to remain inactive for more than 12 months. It is expected that funds for completed phases will

be invoiced within a reasonable time of completion of work for the phase, and projects will be

closed out within a reasonable time following project completion. Implementing agencies that

have projects that have not been closed out within 6 months of final expenditure, or have

projects that remain inactive for more than 12 months, regardless of federal fund source, will

have future OA limited for subsequent projects, and/or have restrictions on future programming.

The intent of this regional delivery policy is to ensure implementing agencies do not lose any

funds due to missing a federal or state funding deadline, while providing maximum flexibility in

delivering transportation projects. KCOG has purposefully established regional deadlines in

advance of state deadlines, to provide the opportunity for implementing agencies, Caltrans,

other partnering agencies and KCOG to solve potential problems and bring the project back on-

line in advance of losing funding due to a missed state deadline. Although the policy is limited to

the RSTP and CMAQ funds managed by KCOG, the state deadlines sited apply to all federal-aid

funds administered by the state. Implementing agencies should pay close attention to the

deadlines of other state and federal funds on their projects so as not to miss any other applicable

funding deadlines.

March 31, 2021

TO: Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI,

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Joseph Stramaglia,

Project Delivery Team Lead

SUBJECT: TTAC AGENDA ITEM: VII.

2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation Improvement Program

DESCRIPTION: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has developed and anticipates the adoption the

2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in response to the Coronavirus Response and

Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 (Federal Act).

DISCUSSION: Because the next CTC meeting occurs on March 24-25, 2021 after the writing and issuance of the

March Kern COG TTAC agenda, it’s possible that this information may require revision by March 31, 2021, the date

of the TTAC meeting. The CTC anticipates the administration of the 2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation

Improvement Program (STIP) in response to the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act

of 2021 (Federal Act). The Federal Act may distribute a draft estimate of $366,013,042 to regional agencies through

the established STIP County Share process. Kern COG’s share of COVID relief funding using the STIP distribution

is estimated at $12,827,182. The final amount may be lower depending on what version of formula distribution the

CTC approves. The assumption for this report is that the Commission may choose to distribute 100% of COVID

funding through the STIP. This process would be separate from the 2022 Regional Transportation Improvement

Program as the draft schedule below indicates.

DRAFT 2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation Improvement Program Schedule

March 9, 2021

CTC

Draft Guidelines/Workshop

March 24, 2021

CTC

Commission adopts Guidelines and Share Distribution

April 15, 2021

KCOG

Adopt 2021 Mid-Cycle STIP Regional Project List

April 30, 2021

CTC

Regional List of projects due to the CTC

May 12-13, 2021

CTC

New projects are presented to the Commission (Notice)

June 23-24, 2021

CTC

Commission adopts the new projects

Project Selection: At the February 18, 2021 regularly scheduled meeting of the Kern COG Board of Directors, action

was taken to direct new Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 funding to two

regionally significant projects including the City of Bakersfield Hageman extension / flyover project and the State

Route 58 Truck Climbing Lane project. The action was specific that approved available COVID funding would be split

50/50 between the two projects. Table A provides specific amounts for each project based on the 100% STIP

distribution option developed by the CTC. Final amounts will be indicated for the March KCOG Board meeting. If the

CTC approves a variation on the STIP methodology and County Share distribution the COVID funding Kern COG

staff will inform the TTAC of the final outcome on March 31.

VII.

TTAC

TTAC Meeting

2021 Mid-Cycle STIP

March 31, 2021

Page 2

According to the Draft 2021 Mid-Cycle STIP Guidelines, Kern COG’s prior action will be forwarded to the CTC as

new projects for the STIP in the draft amounts listed below. The amounts indicated in TABLE A are not the final

amounts and may be lower by $3 to $4 million or so depending on the distribution options the CTC approves.

TABLE A

PROPOSED 2021 MID-CYCLE STIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVID FUNDING

Project Description

Year

Phase

Amount

State Route 58 Truck Climbing Lanes

2021-22

Environmental

$ 6,413,591

Hageman Extension

2021-22

Right-of-Way

$ 6,413,591

Total Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021

$ 12,827,182

Action: Information.

Enclosure: Draft Policies and Procedures Specific to the 2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation

Improvement Program Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act

of 2021.

Page | 1

DRAFT Policies and Procedures Specific to the

2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation Improvement Program

Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of

2021

The California Transportation Commission (Commission) intends to develop and adopt

a 2021 Mid-Cycle State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in response to the

Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 (Federal

Act). The following policies and procedures address the particular circumstances of the

2021 Mid-Cycle STIP.

• Schedule. The following schedule lists the major milestones for the development

and adoption of the 2021 Mid-Cycle STIP:

Draft Guidelines/Workshop

March 9, 2021

Commission adopts Guidelines and Share Distribution

March 24, 2021

List of projects due to the Commission

April 30, 2021

New projects are presented to the Commission (Notice)

May 12-13, 2021

Commission adopts the new projects

June 23-24, 2021

• Funding Distribution. The Commission will distribute $$$,$$$,$$$ (XX.X percent of

the Federal Act) through the 2021 Mid-Cycle STIP. The Regional Improvement

Program will receive $$$,$$$,$$$ (75 percent) and the Interregional Improvement

Program will receive $$$$,$$$,$$$ (25 percent) of the Federal Act amount directed

to the 2021 Mid-Cycle STIP.

• Regional Share Targets. Regional share targets will be calculated based on the

amount identified above for the Regional Improvement Program using the STIP

share distribution formula. These will be the target shares for each region. There will

be no minimum or maximum calculated for these shares.

• Over programming. Regions and the state may program these STIP share targets

even if overprogrammed in the 2020 STIP.

• Planning Programming and Monitoring (PPM). PPM will be calculated based on 5

percent of the regional share targets. Regions will have the option to program PPM

up to the amount of PPM identified.

• State Only Funds Exchange. Regions with a share target amount of $5 million or

less may request state only funds at the time of programming, except for the

urbanized areas with populations over 200,000 identified in the Federal Highway

Administration apportionment notice dated January 15, 2021. A project that is

required to be federalized or that has previously received federal funds is not eligible

for state-only funding. Projects programmed with state only funds are subject to

Article 19 restrictions.

Page | 2

• Programming Options. Regions and the state may choose or do a combination of

the following programming options:

1. Propose New Projects – An agency may choose to program new projects up to

their total target amount. For each new project nominated for funding in the 2021

Mid-Cycle STIP, regions and Caltrans shall submit a Project Programming

Request (PPR), identifying the scope, cost, and schedule. The PPRs shall be

submitted electronically to the Commission by April 30, 2021.

2. Augment Projects - An agency may increase funding to a currently programmed

project to address project cost increases, add scope or exchange funds with local

funds. The project must be programmed in Fiscal Year 2021-22 or later.

3. Advance Projects - An agency may propose to advance projects that are

currently programmed in later years of the STIP. Approval of advancing more

than the target amount will only be possible if other regions elect to delay their

shares.

4. Delay Programming - An agency may choose to delay programming their target

shares. Their shares will be accounted for in the 2022 STIP Fund Estimate

distribution. No action is required.

• Interregional Program. Caltrans may program projects that are eligible through the

State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) in the interregional

program if timely programming through the SHOPP is not possible because of

funding limitations in the SHOPP.

• STIP Guidelines. The STIP guidelines shall apply to all projects that received

Federal Act funding.

March 31, 2021

TO: Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

FROM: AHRON HAKIMI,

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

By: Joseph Stramaglia,

Project Delivery Team Lead

SUBJECT: TTAC AGENDA ITEM: VIII.

2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

DESCRIPTION:

Every two years in the odd-numbered year, regional transportation planning agencies are to submit a

Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) to the California Transportation Commission for

their approval in December of the same odd-numbered year.

DISCUSSION:

The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has initiated the 2022 Regional Transportation

Improvement Program (2022 RTIP) process at their January 27– 28, 2021 meeting to develop a statewide

2022 State Transportation Improvement Program (2022 STIP) for projects of regional significance. The

general order of this process is 1) CTC develops a statewide 5-Year regional share fund estimate; 2) CTC

updates 2022 STIP guidelines; 3) regions submit RTIP’s; and 4) the CTC consolidates RTIP’s and approves

the 2022 STIP.

2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Schedule

January 2021

CTC

Adopted 2022 STIP Fund Estimate Schedule

March 24-25, 2021

CTC

Present Fund Estimate Assumptions to Commissioners

May 12-13, 2021

CTC

Adopt Fund Estimate Assumptions

May 19, 2021

KCOG

Regional Workshop

June 23-24, 2021

CTC

Present Draft Fund Estimate

July 21, 2021

KCOG

Regional Workshop

August 18-19, 2021

CTC

Adopt Statewide Fund Estimate and Guidelines

September 22, 2021

KCOG

Regional Workshop

September 1 & 16, 2021

KCOG

Circulate Adm. Draft 2020 RTIP TTAC & TPPC

October 6 & 21, 2021

KCOG

Circulate Draft 2020 RTIP TTAC & TPPC

November 3 & 18, 2021

KCOG

Regional Adoption of 2022 RTIP TTAC & TPPC

December 15, 2021

KCOG

Submit 2022 RTIP to the CTC by December 15, 2021

February 2022

CTC

Conduct Southern/Northern California Public Hearing

March 2022

CTC

CTC will circulate staff recommendation for 2022 STIP

April 2022

CTC

Approve final 2022 STIP

VIII.

TTAC

TTAC Meeting

2022 RTIP

March 31, 2021

Page 2

The process for the region is to 1) establish new programming capacity defined by the state’s fund estimate;

2) assess current regional project needs including cost estimate updates; 3) develop a Capital Improvement

Program; and 4) regionally adopt the 2022 RTIP for submission to the CTC by December 15, 2021.

Current 2020 STIP as Adopted - Kern COG projects in the current 2020 State Transportation Improvement

Program include highway capacity projects on State Routes 14, 46 and 58. It must be noted that specific

regional actions from the 2020 RTIP cycle affect how the 2022 RTIP cycle program of project

recommendations is developed. First, because there was no new funding capacity for the 2020 RTIP cycle,

a regional decision of note was to defer $30 million from a Caltrans partnership project at State Route 58

and 99 in order to advance construction of the final phase of State Route 46 widening project near Interstate

5. Because the 58 / 99 auxiliary lane project was deferred, it was also removed from the STIP. It is the

region’s intent that RTIP funding be used to supplement other state construction funding in the State

Highway Operations Protection Program (SHOPP). It is staff’s intention to restore this programming if there

is funding capacity to do so and if Caltrans is advancing the design of the auxiliary lane.

The second important action of note taken during the 2020 RTIP cycle was to elevate the need for truck

climbing lanes on State Route 58 east of Bakersfield. It is the region’s intent that this project will also

become a SHOPP project. However, the RTIP process could play a future role in advancing pre-

construction phases to develop the project. Significant coordination with Caltrans will be required for both

the auxiliary lane and truck-climbing lane projects. The third important action that the Board approved was

on State Route 14, the Freeman Gulch widening project, which came to a stand-still when Caltrans was

unable to offer its 40% of funding for these partnership projects with Inyo and Mono County. As a result,

the Kern COG Board agreed with staff that the Freeman Gulch projects for segments 2 or 3 could not

advance without the Caltrans funding partnership intact.

These projects are part of the 2020 State Transportation Improvement Program and reflected in a recent

CTC document called the 2020 Report of STIP Balances County and Interregional Shares, or, the 2020

Orange Book. This publication presents current programming for regions statewide including the status of

any allocation or other project activity. Attachment A of this report includes the report pages with Kern

activity listed. This information will be the point of beginning for establishing the proposed regional Capital

Improvement Program which will be developed over the next several months. The table below provides

construction status of projects from either the 2018 STIP, the 2020 STIP, or both.

SR 14 Freeman Gulch

Segment 2 - this project is currently in the design phase but is shelved

SR 46 Widen Seg 4A

Construction was completed in 2020

SR 46 Widen Seg 4B

This project is starting the construction phase this year

SR 46 Widen Seg 4C

This project is scheduled for construction in 2022

SR 58 Centennial

Centennial Corridor – Mainline: this project is under construction

SR 58 & 99 Aux Lane

This is a Caltrans partnership project which was temporarily shelved

SR 58 Climbing Lanes

This is a Caltrans partnership project not yet introduced to the STIP

2020 STIP funding – It is important to recap that the adopted Fund Estimate established for the 2020 STIP

cycle did not provide new programming for the regions in the outer two years of programming. As a result,

regions were not able to advance new phases of work for projects already in progress. For Kern, the Board

approved the decision to move $30 million of existing programming from Metropolitan Bakersfield out to the

TTAC Meeting

2022 RTIP

March 31, 2021

Page 3

State Route 46 widening project that was in progress and in need of final funding to secure construction.

This transfer of programming was at the core of the Kern 2020 RTIP cycle.

Update of Kern COG Project Delivery Policies and Procedures – In March of 2019, the Kern COG

Board adopted the latest version of the Kern COG Project Delivery Policies and Procedures document

which included updates to Chapters 1, 2 and 3. Chapter 3 focuses on the Regional Transportation

Improvement Program process. The purpose of the update was to bring the Kern COG document to be

more in alignment with recently adopted State Transportation Improvement Program Guidelines as adopted

by the California Transportation Commission. At the heart of the update was the need to review and update

performance measure requirements in the Kern COG policy document that not only are more consistent

with the latest STIP process but more competitive for the many other discretionary transportation programs.

Once completed in March 2019, the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee advised Kern COG staff

that a new call for RTIP projects would not be initiated due to the lack of RTIP funding going forward. They

did not feel that the required effort was commensurate with the available funding. This issue will be revisited

during the 2022 RTIP cycle.

Action: Information.

Enclosures: Attachment A: 2022 RTIP Capital Improvement Program – Baseline

Attachment B: 2020 CTC Orange Book

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

Attachment D: Schedule of Regional 2020 RTIP Workshops

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

Attachment A: 2022 RTIP Capital Improvement Program – Baseline

Attachment B: 2020 CTC Orange Book

Agency

Rte

I

2020 SUMMARY

OF

STIP COUNTY SHARE

Does Not Inc

lu

de

ITIP I

nterreg

ion

al

Shares

(See

Separate

Listing)

($1,000's)

Total County Share. June 30, 2019 (from 2019 Repart) 106,546

Adjustment for 2017

-1

8 and 2018-19 lapses

0

Less 2018-

19

Allocations and closed projects (

13

,994)

Less Projects Lapsed,

Ju

ly 1, 2019-June 30, 2020

0

2020 STIP Fund Estimate Fonnula Distribut

io

n

16

,758

Total County Share.June 30, 2020

10

9.3

10

Kern

Project

Totals

by

Fiscal

Year

PPNO

Project

Ext

Del.

Voted

To

tal

Prior

20-21 21"22 22-23 23-24

Hlohwav

Proiects:

I

Ca

ltrans 46 34 12 Wasco-Jumper

Av

, 4 lane, env

Caltrans

58

3482 Tehachapi

De

nnison

Rd

interchange

Bakersfield

l

oc

3705A

Rt

58-Westside Parkwav Connector IIC-Ph2

Bakersfield cash 37058

AB

3090

Reimbursement !Westside Pk

wv-

Phl )(185-07

Ca

ltrans 14

804213

Freeman Gulch widening-Segment 2 (RIP

40

%)

Caltrans

46

33860

Widen to 4 lanes,

Pav

ilion-

e/

o Lost Hills Rd. Seo

40

Caltrans 395 170 Olancha-Cartago 4-lane expresswav (RIP 1

O"A>l

Ba

kersfield cash 37058

AB

3090

Re

imbu

r

sement

(West

side

Pkwy-P

M )(185-07)

Ca

ltrans

46

3386E \Mden 4 Ins.

Browns

Materia

l

-Farnswo

rlh.

Seg

4C

/

SB

11

Kem COG 6L

03

Planning. prog

ra

mming, and monitoring

Subtota

l,

Hig

hway

Projects

Total

Programmed

or

Voted

since

Ju

ly 1, 2018

Balance

of

STIP

County

Share, Kern

T

ota

l County Share, June

30

, 20

20

T

ota

l Now Programmed or Voted Since July 1. 2019

Un

pr

ogrammed Share

Ba

lance

Share Balance Advanced or Overdrawn

California Transportation Commission

close 2.0701

close

1.636

de

lete

0

Ju

n-2

0 18.9631

1,960

5,400

13,7931

37

,927

27,000

1

,5

00

110,

24

9

110.2

49

109

,3

10

110,249

0

939

Kem

Page 18

of

64

2

,0

70

1,636

0

1,960

0

4,498

0

10,1

64

0 0 0 0

18.963 0 0 0

0 0 0

0

5,400 0 0 0

0 9,295 0 0

0

18,964

18

,963

0

700 0 26,300 0

30

0 300 300 300

25

,363

28

,559 45,563

300

Project

Totals by

Component

24-25 R/W

Const

E&P

PS&E

RMI

Sup

Con

Sup

0 0 0 2.070 0 0 0

0 0 0 648 988 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 18,963 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

1,960

0

0 960 3,500 0 0 340 600

0

2,

4

80

8,310 937

73

1 350 985

0 0

37,927

0 0 0 0

0

10

0 20,900 0 500 100

5,400

300 0 1,500 0 0 0 0

300 3,540 91,100

3,655

4,179 790

6,985

8/112020

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

• •

lb/trans

·

No. I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

PROPOSED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 6-7)

Kern Council

of

Governments

Project Title / Description I

Phase~

------------------------------------

PROPOSED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 6-7)

0

1C060

e

OY150

e

OW920

0

37920

e

1A810

e

1A760

0

1A680

0

OX370

0

OW830

CD

OW930

CD

OX570

Created By Caltrans

2/26/2021 3:24

PM

6

223

6

223

6 5

9 58

6 99

6

46

6 46

6 99

6 33

6 5

1.85 / 10.5

Kern 223 Rehab / Remove and Replace

HMA

(Full Depth Recycle)

R20.

1/21.3

Arvin CAPM / Pavement Preservation

(Multi-Asset CAPM)

4.4

I 10.20

Grapevine Rehab / Pavement

Rehabilitation (2R)

77.252

I Keene Pavement / Pavement Repair

88.34 CAPM/Rehab

54.6

I 54.61 Delano Facility. Reconstruct Building

50.80

I 57.78

East Wasco CAPM / Rehabilitate

Pavement

33.50

I

46.0C

Semitropic CAPM / Overlay RHMA,

Upgrade Guardrail and Dikes

21.15 / 24.

6(

Bakersfield 99 Rehab

II

(South)/

Roadway Rehabilitation (3R)

14.40 /

17.9C

South Taft

Rehab/

Roadway

Rehabilitation (3R)

15.9R / 30

.0

KER

15

CAPM / Remove .35'

HMA

and

Place .25'

HMAand

0.10' RHMA.

Tejon

SRRA

Water & Wastewater

.73/1.08

Upgrades / Upgrade Water and

Wastewater Systems

Proposec

$9,877

ENV $5,029

ENV

$95,658

ENV $165,515

ENV $3,486

ENV $20,211

ENV $20,994

ENV $68,290

ENV $26,704

ENV

$35,406

ENV $10,170

2024/25

2025/26

~

------,

I

L----.,

N

I

L---.,

l----1

L-1

I

A

..

___________

,

----1

0 4.5 9 27

-CJ-=====---•

Miles

18

Page 1

of

12

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

STIP

e Local

,--1

1

__

.J

County Boundary

Lake

Isabella

Note

- The proposed project list consists

of

only SHOPP projects.

Proposed Project List (Year 6-7)

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

PLANNED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 8-10)

I Phase

Construction

Project Title / Description Cost ($K) Year

Kern Council

of

Governments

PLANNED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 8-10)

0

38310

e

19565

e

OX450

0

37520

e

19586

0

38330

0

22144

0

22129

0

1A660

G)

37510

CD

22167

CD

21986

a,

19581

e

19564

G

20430

G

21985

G

19556

Created By Caltrans

2/26/2021

3:

34

PM

9 58

6 65

6

58

9 14

6 5

9

178

6 58

9 58

6 99

9 58

6 99

9 58

6 65

6

33

9 202

9

14

6 99

R99.8

I

R107.7

6.90 / 25.

16

R64.9 /

R64.91

R12.6 / 16.7

52.80

I 62

.6

88.6 / 104

.6

3.

03172

.67

81/81

.1

R43.9R /

49.4

R90.5 /

R100.0

R43.6R /

R43.61R

R138.75 /

R139.0

RO

.O / 6.9

17.9 / 24.0

R5

.0 I

12.093

56.3 / 56.4

0.00 / 10.50

Cache Creek Pavement / Restore

Pavement and Drainage

CAPM

Arvin KER-58 Wim Upgrade / Improve

Weigh Facility

Mojave Pavement / Rehab/CAPM

Pavement and Upgrade ADA

Rehab

RidgecresVlnyokern

Pavement/

Restore Pavement, Fix Drainage and

ADA

In

Kern County at various locations.

Drainage improvements

In

Kern county at CVEF on Route 58

eastbound

CAPM

In

Kern county at Tehachapi from Exit

148 to 0.04 miles south

of

Cache

Creek Overflow #2 bridge.

50

0011

R Spot prep and paint steel

members

In

Kern County at Boron SRRA.

Rehab wastewater treatment.

CAPM

In

Kern County

in

and near Tehachapi

from the begining

of

the route to route

58.

In

Kern County at Freeman Gulch

Bridge (No. 50-0014)

CAPM SB only

Future

$39,623

2026/27

Future $16,

351

2026/27

Future

$3,051 2026/27

Future

$47,558

2026/27

Future $76,423 2027/28

Future $72,355 2027/28

Future $14,196 2027/28

Future

$1,260

2028/29

Future $9,522 2028/29

Future

$41

,208

2028/29

Future

$2,115

2028/29

Future $2,994 2028/29

Future $13,058

2028/29

Future $7,991 2028/29

Future $9,387 2028/29

Future $2,463 2028/29

Future $13,724 2028/29

J

Delan~o

,

L--

-

--t-

....._

\

1]

-----

McFarland

r-

""--

-, J b

V!,as

·c·o- ~ -

~----

1

I

---,

I

iTaft

L-..._

'Y

Maricopa

-----

""'

I

'---,

- Rosamond

---,

-

....

~

I-------~

J---------------------

----------------

._

__

,

N

A

20

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

HM

STIP e Local

@

~

Project Number

r_-

_] County Boundary

- The planned project list consists of

only SHOPP projects.

- Project No. 7 has multiple locations.

Page 2 of

12

Planned Project List (Year 8-10)

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No. I

Project

I

Dist

I RTE I

Post

Miles

I

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

PROGRAMMED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 1-5) • PART I

Project

Title/

Description

I

Phase

~

PROGRAMMED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 1-5)

0

OV280

6

e

OU490

6

e

OU470

6

0

36740 9

0

OU240

6

0

OW160

0

OU480

0

OU100

0

00920

G>

OX350

-

OX520

CD

1A600

e

OU110

G

OU430

CD

OX770

e

36750

Created By Caltrans

2/26/2021 4:01

PM

6

9

184

204

5

14

99

5

46

43

99

58

178

5

58

184

43

202

L0.9 / L

1.1

5.1

/ 6.7

82187

R4

.7

/

R12.6

VAR/VAR

5.97 I 9.78

49

I 50.9

O

I 9.3

10.4/21

.2

6.00

I

15.4C

VAR/VAR

RO

.O I 5.0

39.9 / 46

8.3/12.13

25.2 I 25.4

0.25 I 0.25

Kern 184/Sunset Roundabout

I

CON

Intersection Improvements

Golden Empire CAPM / Pavement

Closeout

Preservation (CAPM)

Lost Hills Rehab / Pavement

CON

Rehabilitation (2R)

Rosamond-Mojave Rehab / 2R CON

Various locations

in

Kern and Kings

CON

Counties

Grapevine Culvert

Repair/

Upgrade

CON

Drainaqe Systems

Wasco Route 46 CAPM / Pavement

Closeout

Preservation (CAPM)

Enos Lane CAPM & ADA Curb Ramps

CON

/ Pavement Preservation (CAPM)

Union Ave to White Lane 2R

Rehab/

Pavement Rehabilitation and Improve

CON

Vertical Clearance

Reward CAPM / Pavement

DES/

Preservation (CAPM)

ROW

Weedpatch to Lake Isabella Rumble

Strips / Construct Centerline and CON

Shoulder Rumble Strips

Ke

rn

5 Emergency Pavement Repairs ,

CON

Repair Damaged Pavement

West Rosedale CAPM / Pavement

ENV

Preservation (CAPM)

Morning Drive 3R Rehab / Roadway

DES/

Rehabilitation (3R) ROW

Wasco SR43/46 Intersection

Improvements / Intersection ENV

Improvements

Tehachapi Maintenance Station

DES/

Relocation / Construct New

ROW

Maintenance Station

$9,050 2019/20

$5,105 2019/20

$29,330

2019/20

$73,615

2019/20

$10,802 2019/20

$14,214

2019/20

$7,610 2019/20

$14,339

2019/20

$66,740

2019/20

$15,970 2020/21

$6,513 2020/21

$1,638

2020/21

$12,400

2020/21

$12,140 2020/21

$10,100

2021/22

$16,783

2021/22

I

I I

I

'-----,

I

L----,

I

: •T~

ft

l

L--1_

)

:Maricopa

I

0 5 10 20 30

-i::::::i-====::::i--•

Miles

Page 3

of

12

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

STIP

e Local

,---,

l

__

J County Boundary

Kern Council

of

Governments

Note

- The programmed project list consists

of

only SHOPP projects.

Programmed Project List (Year 1-5) - Part I

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

• •

li:tltrans·

No. I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

PROGRAMMED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 1-5) - PART II

Project Title / Description

I

Phase

~

Kern Council

of

Governments

PROGRAMMED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 1-5)

G

OQ281

6

G

OX760

6

G)

OTOOO

6

fJ

OS050

6

e

36720 9

G

OW150

6

e

OW990

6

G

OX080

6

fl)

OY130

6

fJ

OX380

6

G

1A690

6

fJ

OR190 6

G

OU290

6

G

OX330

6

G

OX160

6

G

37890

9

Created By Caltrans

2/26/

2021

3:58

PM

99

119

58

166

202

204

178

33

166

5

223

184

5

58

14

23.6 /

R28.4

0.14 / 0.54

R53.2 /

R55.6

17.3 / 17.7

r4

.89 /

R4.89

0.00 / 6.752

2.805

I

2.805

8.0

I 50.0

40.40

I

59.00

0.

0019.00

47.55 I

52.15

15.7 / 16.3

0.8

I 8.3

0.0

I 4.40

64.40

I

67.30

46.2 / 52.8

Bakersfield 99 Rehab Replacement

ENV

Plantinq / Replacement Plantinq

Taft Left Turn Channelization/ Left-Turn

ENV

Channelization

KER 58

ADA/

Upgrade Curb Ramps

DES/

ROW

Calif Aqueduct Bridge Rehab / Bridge

ENV

Rehabilitation/Seismic Retrofit

Cummings Valley

Rd

Int/

Construct Left

DES/

Turn Lane ROW

SR 204 within City

of

Bakersfield and

TUL SR 65

in

Exeter at various DES

locations

Union Avenue High Intensity Activated

DES/

Crosswalk/

Install Hybrid Pedestrian

ROW

Beacon (Hawk)

Kern Canyon Culvert Rehab / Repair

DES/

and Replace Culverts

ROW

Blackwell's Corner CAPM / Pavement

ENV

Preservation (Multi-Asset CAPM)

Maricopa Highway CAPM / Pavement

ENV

Preservation (Multi-Asset CAPM)

Buttonwillow Median

Barrier/

Construct

ENV

Median Barrier

Arvin SR 223/184 Roundabout/

DES/

Intersection Improvement

ROW

Weedpatch Hwy 3R Rehab / Roadway

DES/

Rehabilitation (3R) ROW

Fort Tejon 2R Rehab / Pavement

ENV

Rehablilitation (2R)

Edison 2R Rehab / Pavement

ENV

Rehabilitation (2R)

Freeman 3 CAPM / Pavement Repair

ENV

(CAPM)

$10,340

$5,221

$4,620

$44,045

$5,044

$10,728

$4,275

$13,000

$22,570

$14,540

$5,720

$3,700

$33,055

$31

,350

$14,270

$8,707

2021/22

2022/23

N

2022/23

-

2022/23

0 5 10 20 30

-=:::::11a:::=::=:a-- Mile~

2022/23

Page4of12

Project Program & Legend

- SHOPP - Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

Rosamond

----------------------- --------

STIP - Local

,-

-,

l

__

.J

County Boundary

Note

- The programmed project list consists

of only SHOPP projects.

Programmed Project List (Year 1-5) - Part

II

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No. ] Project I Dist I RTE 1 Post Miles I

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

PROGRAMMED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 1-5) • PART

111

Kern Council

of

Governments

Project Title I Description

I

Phase

~

--------------------

..,.,.....-

..-

- ---------------------

PROGRAMMED PROJECT LIST (YEARS 1-5)

Delano •

~I

IL--

----+-,

v

G

OX240 6

G

OW810

6

G

OV610 6

G

1A470 6

G

OU500

6

Created By Caltrans

2/26/2021 4:04

PM

33

21

.8 / 39.8

155 0.00

I 1.50

119

28.3 I

31.2E

43 15.8 / 15.8

5

10.20 /

15.90

KER

33

Culvert Rehab / Repair &

ENV

$11,430

Replace Culverts.

Delano SR-155 Rehab (3R) / Roadway

ENV $16,740

Rehabilitation (3R)

Pumpkin Center 3R Rehab / Roadway

DES/

$57,300

Rehabilitation (3R)

ROW

Santa

Fe

Roundabout/ Construct

ENV $13,617

Roundabout

Wheeler Ridge CAPM / Pavement

ENV $22,350

Preservation (Multi-Asset CAPM)

2023/24

..

,

I

------,

I

'-------,

I

..

-----,

I

L---,_

0 4 8 24

-c:=i-====:::11--•

Miles

16

I Maricopa

----------

1

I

~----

1

-----1

L-,

I

'------------,

______________

...__

______

_

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

STIP

e Local

,--1

L

__

J County Boundary

Note

- The programmed project list consists

of

only SHOPP projects.

Page 5

of

12

Programmed Project List (Year 1-5) - Part Ill

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No

.

0

e

C,

e

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

CONSTRUCTION READY PROJECT LIST

I

Project

I

Dist

I RTE I

Post

Miles I

Project

Title/

Description

I Phase

~

CONSTRUCTION READY

PROJECT

LIST

(READY

TO LIST ACHIEVED)

West Rosedale CAPM /

OU110

6 58

39.9

I 46 Pavement Preservation CON

(CAPM)

OU430 6

184 8.3

I 12.13

Morning Drive 3R Rehab /

DES

Roadway Rehabilitation (3R)

OX350 6 58 6.00

I 15.40

Reward CAPM / Pavement

DES

Preservation (CAPM)

Weedpatch to Lake Isabella

OX520

6

178

VAR/VAR

Rumble Strips / Construct

CON

Centerline and Shoulder

Rumble Strips

Kern 5 Emergency Pavement

1A600

6 5

RO.O

I 5.0

Repairs/

Repair Damaged CON

Pavement

$12,400 2020/21

$12,140 2020/21

$15,970 2020/21

$6,513 2020/21

$1,638 2020/21

..I

I

L------

N

1

I

L----.,

I

L---.,

l----1

L-(

I

Kern

Council

of

Governments

Lake

Isabella

A

~----------, r-------------------------

----1

Created By Caltrans

2/26/2021 4:10

PM

0 4.5 9 27

•c:-c::::===:J--•

Miles

18

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

HM

STIP e Local

@

~

Project Number

r_-_]

County Boundary

Page 6 of

12

Note

- The construction project list consists of

only SHOPP projects.

- Project No. 4 has multiple locations.

Construction Ready Project List

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No. I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

NON-SHOPP PROJECT LIST

0

45712

e

18080

0

38570

0

1A930

e

38590

e

OY110

0

38580

e

1A950

e

38800

4D

1A890

CD

38660

e

18000

G)

38130

4D

18020

G

1A990

e

1A900

-

1C002

G

OY550

Created

By

Caltrans

2/26/2021 4:23 PM

6

14

6 65

9 14

6 5

9 14

6

178

9 58

6 46

9 14

6

43

9 14

6 33

9 178

6

155

6 43

6

5

6

99

6 5

53/58.3

1.0 / 25.169

52.8 / 58.3

77.0 / 82.6

R12.

3/

R15.3

24.6

I

R44.191

77.252 /

R125.3

51

.2 /

57.785

58.3 / 62.2

25.2 /

38.807

R3.0 / R3.0

34.2 / 40.0

91

.88 /

91

.88

35.5 / 37.5

17.3 / R24.0

4.4

I

R15.

8R

54.5 I 54.5

0.8/2

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

NON-SHOPP PROGRAM PROJECT LIST • PART I

Project Title I Description

Freeman Gulch Widening-Segment

2

I Convert Existing 2-Lane to

4-Lane Expressway

Striping/

6 inch Stripe

Pavement Preservation / AR Chip

Seal - S81

Rigid Roadbeds / PCC Slab

Replacement

Pavement Preservation / Digouts

Pavement

Preservation/

PME

Medium Chip Seal

Pavement Preservation / Digouts

Pavement Preservation / Remove

and Replace RHMA Type G

SlopesNegetation

I Slope Repair

Pavement Preservation / RHMA

Type G with Diqouts

Landscaping / Irrigation Repair

Pavement

Preservation/

PME

Medium Chip Seal

Maintenance Facilities / Pave portion

of

yard

Pavement

Preservation/

0.15

HMA

Type a w/ Digouts

Pavement Preservation / PME Med

Chip Seal

Rigid Roadbeds / PCC Slab

Replacement

Maintenance Facilities / Slurry Seal

Delano MF

Lebec Mountain Village Roundabout

I Construct Roundabout at Ramp

Intersections

!Phase~

DES/

ROW

$85,530 2022/23

CON $2,570 2020/21

CON

$916 2020/21

CON

$1

,075

2020/21

CON

$1,761

2020/21

CON $2,525 2020/21

CON

$1

,100 2020/21

CON $4,300 2020/21

CON $40 2020/21

CON $5,425 2020/21

CON $32

2020/21

CON $2,425 2020/21

CON $215 2020/21

CON $2,650 2020/21

CON $3,400 2020/21

CON $2,950 2020/21

CON $224 2020/21

ENV $402 2023/24

I

L-

-

--1

I

,

___

,

I

I •Taff

!.-.,_ V

0 5 10 20

Maricopa

----

'

I

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor HM STIP e Local

@

~

Project Number

r_-_]

County Boundary

Page 7

of

12

Kern Council

of

Governments

Note

- Project No. 4, 12, 15, and 16 have

multiple locations

- Project No.

1 is strictly Non-SHOPP.

Non-SHOPP Program Project List - Part I

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No

. I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

NON-SHOPP PROJECT LIST

CD

OR100

e,

OV770

G

48450

G

1A220

G>

48451

e

1A500

e

OT030

G

37710

G

1A330

fl)

37730

G)

OV290

G)

38180

a,

OY940

G

ON590

Created

By

Caltrans

2/26/2021

4:

59

PM

6 5

6 155

6 204

6 46

6 99

6 155

6 5

9 14

6 58

9 14

6

184

9 58

6 58

6

43

9.5/12

68.2/R68.6

5.9/6.8

30

.5/30.5

27.3/27.3

0.47/0.47

28.17 I

28.17

R15.5 /

R15.5

76.1

I 76.6

L 16.6

I

L 16.6

1.5 / 1.5

R107.0 /

R107.0

R55.47 /

R59.67

30.4 / 30.4

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

NON-SHOPP PROGRAM PROJECT LIST • PART

II

Project

Title

/ Description

Grapevine Interchange / Relocate

lnterchanqe

Usace Lake Isabella Oversight

Projects / Realign Roadway

Hageman

Flyover/

Extension and

Connection

to

RTE 204

Lost Hills Pedestrian OC / Construct

Pedestrian Overcrossing

Hageman Flyover - Pedestrian

Overcrossing / Pedestrian

Overcrossinq

SR-155/Lexington Intersection

Improvement/ Intersection

Improvement

Mobility - TMS /

In

Kern , Kings and

Fresno Counties,

on

Route 5 at

various locations. Install Vehicle

Detection Systems (VOS).

Mojave Special Crews Building

Remodel / Remodel Maintenance

Station

KER

58

Eastern Kern Lane

Replacement / Remove and

Replace #2 Lane

Mojave HMS Phase

Ill/

Construct

Phase Three of Maintenance

Station

Safety Improvements/

In

Kern

County,

in

Lamont at Hall Road.

Modify traffic signal.

Ca

58

CMS Maintenance Pull

Out/

Construct Pull Out

Pavement/

In

Kern County,

in

Bakersfield

on

Route 58 at various

ramps/locations. Remove and

replace pavement.

Safety - Collision Reduction / In

Kern County, at Sherwood

Avenue. Extend culvert.

!

Phase~

ENV

$1

,200

2025/26

CON

$419 Future

DES/

$5,658 2021/22

ROW

DES

$1

,300 2020/21

DES $0 2021/22

ENV $498

2021/22

CON

$3,762

2020/21

CON $2,273 2020/21

ENV $1,900 2021/22

CON $2,273 2020/21

DES $327

2021/22

CON $382 2020/21

DES $400 2021/22

DES $250

2021/22

----,

I

L----,

I

: •

T~ft

!

1.--,_

l

!7

copa

---

.--1·

I

0 5 10 30

-c::::J-====::::i--•

Miles

20

Page

8 of

12

Project Program & Legend

e

SHOPP

e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

Kern Council

of

Governments

Rosamond

---------------------------

-----

STIP

e

Local

,---1

l

__

J County Boundary

DNote

Non

-

SHOPP

Program

Project List - Part

II

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No. I Project I Dist I

RTE

I Post Miles I

NON-SHOPP PROJECT LIST

e

OS790

G

1A150

-

1A130

G

OY950

G

OV130

G

OX920

G)

1B160

G)

1C240

CD

1A420

CD

OX540

CD

1A860

Creat

ed

By Caltrans

2/

26

/

2021

5

:1

3

PM

6 178

6 99

6 178

6 99

6 119

6 5

6 58

6 178

6 184

R4.5 / R4.5

20.6

I 20.6

R4.6 / R5.2

R1

.89 /

R5.78

R39.1 /

R39.1

26.1 / 26.4

RO

.O I

RO

.O

31.44 /

31

.75

R4.6 / R4.6

R2.26 /

R2.26

8.35 / 8.35

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

NON-SHOPP PROGRAM PROJECT LIST • PART

111

Project Title / Description

)Phase~

Pavement /

In

Kern County,

in

Bakersfield at the Mount Vernon

DES $384

2021/22

Avenue westbound onramp.

Remove and replace pavement.

Major Damage - Protective

Betterments /

In

Kern County, in

DES $163 2021/22

Bakersfield at Pacheco Road.

Upgrade fence.

Major Damage - Protective

Betterments / In Kern County, in

DES $195 2021/22

the city

of

Bakersfield at various

locations. Construct fence.

Pavement /

In

Kern County, in

Bakersfield on Route 178 at various

DES $415 2021/22

ramps/locations. Remove and

replace pavement.

Pavement /

In

Kern County, near

Bakersfield on Route 99 at Merced

Avenue offramp. Remove asphalt

DES

$600

2021/22

pavement and replace with

concrete pavement.

Safety Improvements/

In

Kern

County, at Old River Road. Install DES $205 2021/22

safety lighting.

Mobility - Operational Improvements

/

In

Fresno, Kern , Kings, Madera

and Tulare counties

on

various DES $325 2021/22

routes at various locations. Repair

and replace detection loops

Pavement/

In

Kern County from

0.

01

miles west

of

Route 5 SB

offramp to Tracy Avenue (East). CON $385 2020/21

Remove and replace pavement

and loops.

Major Damage - Protective

CON $134 2020/21

Betterments /

Safety Improvement

s/

In

Kings County,

at Pickerell Avenue. Install flashing DES $205 2020/21

beacon.

Pavement /

In

Kern County, near

Bakersfield at Edison Road. DES $410 2020/21

Remove and replace pavement.

I

·-------

1

I

'-----,

I

._

__

..,

..

,

1 Maricopa

----------.....-1.

I

N

I

'----,

A

L.----~

0 4 8 24

-CJ-====::::::11--•

Miles

16

Project

Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

'-

..

I

-------------,

L----

STIP e Local

,--1

L

__

J County Boundary

Note

Kern Council

of

Governments

Page

9 of

12

Non

-SHOPP Program Project

Li

st

- Part Ill

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No. I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

NON-SHOPP PROJECT LIST

CD

OY340

G

1A550

CD

1C030

CD

OY780

e

18150

CD

1C330

G)

44255

G

24340

Created By Caltrans

2/26/2021 5:27

PM

6

43 33.2 / 33.5

99

26.7126

.7

5 11.7 / 12.39

26.502 /

99

26.502

58

31

.

6/51

.8

5

13.54 / 13.8

46 29.7/31 .9

58 173.3/189.9

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

NON-SHOPP PROGRAM PROJECT

LIST·

PART IV

Project Title / Description

Safety Improvements / In Kern

County, at Pond Road. Install

flashinQ beacon.

Bridge -

Health/

In

Kern County,

on Route 99 at

th

e Calloway Canal

Bridge and on Route 119

at

the

Weed Creek and Broad Creek

Bridges. Repair bridges.

Mobility - WIM Scales & CVEFs /

In

Kern County from the Grapevine

Commercial Vehicle Enforcement

Facility to 2.6 miles south of the

Route 99 junction. Replace weigh

station message sign.

Facilities/

In

Bakersfield, at the old

California Highway Patrol (CHP)

facility at 4040 Buck Owens Boulevard.

Acquire facility to

maintain Transportation

Management Center (TMC)

functions.

Kern Freeway Signs / Upgrade

and Install Freeway Signs

Pavement/

In

Kern County at the

NB off ramp to Wheeler Ridge.

!Phase~

DES $173 2020/21

DES

$555

2021/22

DES

$500

2021/22

DES $106 2021/22

CON $460 2020/21

DES $325

2021/22

I

L.-----

1

I

'----,

I

: •

T~ft

l

..

--,

..

J

Maricopa-

----

__,

-

....,..

~

I

I Grapevine

L.---

,

___

_

'-,

Kern Council

of

Governments

Rosamond

Remove and Replace HMA

Route

46

Conv/Exwy Segment

L---------L

__

!

,-------------------------

N

1A

48

/ 2-Lane Conventional Highway

CON $40,503 2020/21

to 4-Lane Expressway Segment

48

Mojave Bypass Closeout / Bypass

Closeout

$87,010

Future

0 5 10

..

Page 10

of

12

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

STIP

e Local

,--,

l

__

J County Boundary

Ralmdale

Note

- Project No. 48 does not include

relinquished portions

of

state route 58.

Non-SHOPP Program Project List - Part IV

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No.

I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT

LIST·

PART I

Project Title / Description

I

Phase

~

COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT LIST

0

OU480

e

OU490

e

OU100

0

OX350

e

OU110

e

OU430

0

OX330

0

OX380

0

37890

G)

OY130

CD

OU290

e

OU500

G

OV610

CD

OW810

e

37920

CD

1C060

CD

OW920

Crea

ted

By

Caltrans

2/26/2021 3:16

PM

6 46

6

204

6 43

6 58

6 184

6 5

6 166

9

14

6 33

6 184

6 5

6 119

6 155

9 58

6 223

6 5

49 / 50.9

5.1

/6.7

0 I 9.3

6.00 / 15.40

39.9 / 46

8.

3/12

.13

0.014.40

0.00 / 9.00

46.2 / 52.8

40.40

I

59.00

0.8 / 8.3

10.20 /

15.90

28.3 /

31

.28

0.00 / 1.50

77.252 /

88.34

1.85/10

.5

4.4 / 10.20

Wasco Route 46 CAPM / Pavement

Closeout

Preservation (CAPM)

Golden Empire CAPM / Pavement

Closeout

Preservation (CAPM)

Enos Lane CAPM & ADA Curb Ramps /

CON

Pavement Preservation (CAPM)

Reward CAPM / Pavement Preservation

DES/

(CAPM)

ROW

West Rosedale CAPM / Pavement

Closeout

Preservation (CAPM)

Morning Drive 3R Rehab / Roadway

DES/

Rehabilitation (3R)

ROW

Fort Tejon 2R

Rehab/

Pavement

ENV

Rehablilitation (2R)

Maricopa Highway CAPM / Pavement

ENV

Preservation (Multi-Asset CAPM)

Freeman 3 CAPM / Pavement Repair

ENV

(CAPM)

Blackwell's Corner CAPM / Pavement

ENV

Preservation (Multi-Asset CAPM)

Weedpatch Hwy 3R Rehab / Roadway

DES/

Rehabilitation (3R)

ROW

Wheeler Ridge CAPM / Pavement

ENV

Preservation (Multi-Asset CAPM)

Pumpkin Center 3R

Rehab/

Roadway

DES/

Rehabilitation (3R)

ROW

Delano SR-155 Rehab (3R) / Roadway

ENV

Rehabilitation (3R)

Keene

Pavement/

Pavement Repair

ENV

CAPM/Rehab

Kern 223 Rehab / Remove and Replace

ENV

HMA (Full Depth Recycle)

Grapevine Rehab / Pavement

ENV

Rehabilitation (2R)

$7,610

$5,105

$14,339

$15,970

$12,400

$12,140

$31

,350

$14,540

$8,707

$22,570

$33,055

$22,350

$57,300

$16,740

$165,515

$9,877

$95,658

2019/20

2020/21

2022/23

2023/24

N

2023/24

*

L----

1

: •

T~tt

l

·--,~

y

Maricopa

I

2024/25

0 5 10 20

2024/25

Page

11

of

12

Project Program & Legend

e

SHOPP

e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

STIP e

Local

,--1

L

__

J County Boundary

Kern Council

of

Governments

Rosamond

Note

- The complete streets project list

consists of only

SHOPP

projects.

Complete

St

reets

Project List - Part I

Attachment C: Current Listings of State Highway Maintenance Project Investments

No.

I Project I Dist I RTE I Post Miles I

KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS & CALTRANS REGIONAL COORDINATION FOR PROJECTS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT LIST • PART

11

Project Title / Description

I

Phase

~

Kern Council

of

Governments

COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT LIST

G

OY150

G)

OX370

G)

OW830

a,

1A760

$

1A680

G)

19565

e,

38310

a,

37520

0

38330

G

19581

G

20430

G

19564

G)

37510

Created By Caltrans

2/26/2021

3:13

PM

6 223

6

99

6

33

6 46

6 65

9

58

9

14

9 178

6

65

9 202

6

33

9

58

R20.1 /

21

.3

Arvin CAPM / Pavement Preservation

(Multi-Asset CAPM)

21.15 / Bakersfield 99 Rehab

II

(South)/

24.60

Roadway Rehabilitation (3R)

14.40 / South Taft

Rehab/

Roadway

17

.90

Rehabilitation (3R)

50.80 I

East Wasco CAPM / Rehabilitate

57.78 Pavement

33.

50

I

Semitropic CAPM / Overlay RHMA,

46.00 Uoarade Guardrail and Dikes

6.90 I 25.16 CAPM

R99.8

I Cache Creek Pavement/ Restore

R107.7 Pavement and Drainage

R12.6 / 16.7

Mojave Pavement / Rehab/CAPM

Pavement and Upgrade ADA

88.6 I 104.6

Ridgecrest/lnyokern

Pavement/

Restore

Pavement, Fix Drainage and ADA

RO.O

I 6.9 CAPM

R5.0

I

In

Kern County

in

and near Tehachapi

12.093 from the begining

of

the route to route

5€

17.9/24

.0 CAPM

R90.5 /

In

Kern county at Tehachapi from Exit

R100.0

148 to 0.04 miles south of Cache Creek

Overflow #2 bridge.

ENV $5,029

ENV

$68,290

ENV $26,704

ENV $20,

211

ENV $20,994

Future $16,351

ENV $39,623

ENV $47,558

ENV $72,355

Future

$13,058

Future $9,387

Future $7,991

Future $41,208

2024/25

2025/26

2026/27

2027/28

2028/29

J

I

~--.,

-------1

I

rl

._

___

I Rosamond

-,

N

L--------

J-----------------------

-----------------

'---~

A

20 30

-==--===:::1111~-

Miles

0 5 10

Project Program & Legend

e SHOPP e Minor

@

~

Project Number

HM

STIP e Local

,--,

L

__

J County Boundary

Note

- The complete streets project list

consists

of

only SHOPP projects.

Page 12

of

12 Complete Streets Project List - Part

II

Attachment D: Schedule of Regional 2020 RTIP Workshops

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 1 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 2 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 3 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 4 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 5 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 6 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 7 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 8 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 9 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 10 OF 11

Attachment E: Eastern California MOU

ADOPTED MOU FOR 3-COUNTY PROGRAMMING PARTNERSHIP – PAGE 11 OF 11

Attachment F: 60 / 40 EQUITY REPORT

CURRENT BASELINE 60/40 UPDATE PAGE 1 OF 3

Attachment F: 60 / 40 EQUITY REPORT

CURRENT BASELINE 60/40 UPDATE PAGE 2 OF 3

Attachment F: 60 / 40 EQUITY REPORT

CURRENT BASELINE 60/40 UPDATE PAGE 3 OF 3

Kern Council of Governments

1401 19

th

Streets, Suite 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 661-635-2900 Facsimile 661-324-8215 TTY 661-832-7433 www.kerncog.org

March 31, 2021

TO: Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

FROM: Ahron Hakimi

Executive Director

By: Robert M. Snoddy

Regional Planner

SUBJECT: TTAC AGENDA ITEM: IX.

THE FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2021 FTA SECTION 5311 CALL FOR

PROJECTS

DESCRIPTION:

Rural agencies providing public transportation services are eligible to apply for FY 2021

funding from the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) through the Section 5311

program. Nine local agencies are eligible to apply.

DISCUSSION:

Caltrans notified Kern COG staff that the FY 2021 FTA Section 5311 Regional

apportionment will be $1,642,208. Kern COG staff has prepared an FY 2021 5311

Program of Projects (POP) to identify specific agency apportionments. Eligible agencies

must provide Kern COG staff its local match for the FY 2021 funds no later than

Friday, April 2, 2021.

Caltrans also notified Kern COG staff that a second pot of money is available to the

Kern region through the FTA Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental

Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) of 2021 and the Kern regional apportionment is

$4,341,588. The CRRSAA Program of Projects does not require a local match. The

CRRSAA fund supports the transit industry during the Covid-19 public health

emergency. This includes operating expenses to maintain transit services as well as

paying for administrative leave for transit personnel due to reduces operations during an

emergency. If your agency has furloughed any staff, you are only eligible for operating

assistance projects.

FTA has required Caltrans to manage the 5311 Grant program in California. Kern COG

staff has notified eligible recipients for 5311 funds of their agency’s apportionment

IX.

TTAC

Kern Council of Governments

1401 19

th

Streets, Suite 300 Bakersfield CA 93301 661-635-2900 Facsimile 661-324-8215 TTY 661-832-7433 www.kerncog.org

schedule via E-mail on March 23, 2021. 5311 eligible recipients are encouraged to

contact Kern COG staff with their local match amount for this program at their

earliest convenience but no later than Friday, April 2, 2021.

5311 grant applications and supporting documents are due to Caltrans no later

than Friday, April 30, 2021, (via the BlackCat electronic award program). Please

call Bob Snoddy, Regional Planner at 661-635-2916 or e-mail Bob at

bsnoddy@kerncog.org for additional information.

ACTION:

Staff recommends the members of the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee

recommend that the Transportation Planning Policy Committee adopt by resolution FY

2021 FTA Section 5311 Program of Projects and the CRRSAA Program of Projects

Attachments: FY 2021 FTA 5310 Program of Projects, CRRSAA Program of Projects,

and supporting documents

Program of Projects (POP)

FY2021

Due: April 30, 2021 at 2pm PST

Agency Name:

5311 CMAQ

Regional Contact Info:

Regional

Contact Name:

Phone Number:

Contact Title: Date:

General Information:

County or Region: Caltrans District:

Original

Submission Date:

Revision

Number:

Revision

Submission Date:

Section A: Available Funding

Apportionment for this Cycle (Federal Share):

Section B: Programming

Operating Assistance Total:

Capital Total:

Total Programmed (Operating + Capital):

Flexible Funds (if applying for CMAQ, STP or Federalized STIP):

Flex Funds Total:

*Request for transfer will be applied for directly through the District - Local Assistance,

District Engineer, and Headquarters’ Division of Local Assistance. Division of Rail & Mass

Transportation will receive a conformation once the transfer is completed.

Bob Snoddy

661-635-2916

Regional Planner

Kern

69

$ 1,642,208

✔

04/30/2021

04/16/2021

$ 1,642,208

Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)

All federal funds to be used for transit projects must be included in a federally

approved STIP. A Transportation Planning Agency (TPA) must ensure that Section

5311 projects are included in the Department of Transportation’s (Department)

Statewide Transportation Federal Improvement Program (FSTIP), which is jointly

approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and FTA.

A copy of the federally approved STIP Page must be attached for all projects to

be programmed through the Section 5311 program. The project description and

associated dollar amounts must be consistent with the federally approved STIP

information.

• Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are responsible for

programming projects within their jurisdiction.

• Rural Transit & Intercity Bus staff will submit Non-MPO / Rural Transportation

organizations projects directly to the Department’s Division of Financial

Programming for inclusion into the FSTIP.

For further guidance see the Department’s Division of Financial Programming

website.

PART 1: Operating Assistance - Regional Apportionment

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are responsible for sub-allocating projects within their jurisdiction:

Subrecipient

Project

Description

Federal

Share

Local Share

(Excluding Toll

Credit)

Toll Credit

Amount (if any)

Net Project Cost

Program of

Projects

Document

Year

Programmed

Date or

Amendment

Number

Operating Assistance Funds Total:

Arvin

Operations

$ 76,034

2021

July 2021

California City

Operations

$ 51,237

2021

July 2021

McFarland

Operations

$ 53,536

2021

July 2021

Ridgecrest

Operations

$ 101,817

2021

July 2021

Shafter

Operations

$ 67,823

2021

July 2021

Taft

Operations

$ 34,159

2021

July 2021

Tehachapi

Operations

$ 44,175

2021

July 2021

Wasco

Operations

$ 96,890

2021

July 2021

$ 1,642,208

$ 0

Kern Transit

Operations

$ 1,116,537

2021

July 2021

PART 2: Capital (Vehicles, Construction, Preventive Maintenance and Planning) - Regional Apportionment

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are responsible for sub-allocating projects within their jurisdiction:

Subrecipient

Project

Description

Federal

Share

Local Share

(Excluding Toll

Credit)

Toll Credit

Amount (if any)

Net Project Cost

Program of

Projects

Document

Year

Programmed

Date or

Amendment

Number

Capital Assistance Funds Total:

$ 0

PART 3: FLEX FUNDS (i.e. CMAQ, STP, or Federalized STIP*) if applicable

*Federalized STIP projects must complete the CTC allocation process.

Subrecipient

Project

Description

Federal

Share

Local Share

(Excluding Toll

Credit)

Toll Credit

Amount (if any)

Net Project Cost

Program of

Projects

Document

Year

Programmed

Date or

Amendment

Number

FLEX Funds Total:

$ 0

Instructions:

PART 1 – Operating Assistance

• Do not list previously approved projects (i.e. projects listed in a prior grant).

• Funding split: 44.67% Local Share and 55.33% Federal Share.

• Third Party Contract Requirement – all third-party contracts must contain

federal clauses required under FTA Circular 4220.1F and approved by the

State prior to bid release.

• Net project cost does not include ineligible cost (i.e. farebox, other

revenues, etc.).

PART 2 – Capital (Vehicles, Construction, Preventive Maintenance and Planning)

• PRE-AWARD AUTHORITY IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN FOR ALL CAPITAL

PURCHASES Receiving an executed Standard Agreement (DOT-213A) is

NOT procurement authorization.

• All vehicles procured with Section 5311 program funds must be ADA

accessible regardless of service type (fixed route or demand-response

service).Capital projects must contain a full description of project: A

PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY (PES) is required for Capital

projects other than vehicle procurement.(i.e. facility or shelter - include

specifics, planning studies, preventative maintenance). The PES does not

satisfy the requirements for environmental review and approval. When

the agency prepares the documentation for a categorical exclusion, the

Environmental Justice Analysis must be included.

• Funding split: 11.47% Local Share and 88.53% Federal Share.

• Procurement Contract Requirement – all documents used for procuring

capital projects must contain federal clauses required under FTA Circular

4220.1F and approved by DRMT prior to bid release.

PART 3 - FLEXIBLE FUNDS (i.e. CMAQ, STP, or Federalized STIP*) if applicable:

• Request for transfer will be applied for directly through the District - Local

Assistance District Engineer, and Headquarters’ Division of Local

Assistance. Division of Rail & Mass Transportation (DRMT) will receive a

confirmation once the transfer is completed.

• Funding split: 11.47% Local Share and 88.53% Federal Share. CMAQ may

be funded up to 100% at the discretion of the Regional Planning

Agency/MPO.

Program of Projects (POP)

Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriation Act of 2021

Due: April 30, 2021 at 2pm PST

Agency Name:

Regional Contact Info:

Regional

Contact Name:

Phone Number:

Contact Title: Date:

General Information:

County or Region: Caltrans District:

Original

Submission Date:

Revision

Number:

Revision

Submission Date:

Section A: Available Funding

Apportionment for this Cycle (Federal Share):

Section B: Programming

Operating Assistance Total:

Capital Total:

Total Programmed (Operating + Capital):

Kern Council of Governments

Bob Snoddy

661-635-2916

Regional Planner

Kern

69

$ 4,341,588

04/16/2021

$ 4,341,588

PART 1: Operating Assistance - Regional Apportionment

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are responsible for sub-allocating projects within their jurisdiction:

Subrecipient

Project

Description

Federal

Share

Local Share

(Excluding Toll

Credit)

Toll Credit

Amount (if any)

Net Project Cost

Program of

Projects

Document

Year

Programmed

Date or

Amendment

Number

Operating Assistance Funds Total:

Arvin

Operating

$ 201,016

$ 0

$ 201,016

N/A

California City

Operating

$ 135,458

$ 0

$ 135,458

N/A

McFarland

Operating

$ 141,536

$ 0

$ 141,536

N/A

Ridgecrest

Operating

$ 269,178

$ 0

$ 269,178

N/A

Shafter

Operating

$ 179,308

$ 0

$ 179,308

N/A

Taft

Operating

$ 90,305

$ 0

$ 90,305

N/A

Tehachapi

Operating

$ 116,789

$ 0

$ 116,789

N/A

Wasco

Operating

$ 256,154

$ 0

$ 256,154

N/A

$ 4,341,588

$ 0

$ 4,341,588

N/A

$ 2,951,844

$ 0

$ 2,951,844

Operating

Kern Transit

PART 2: Capital (Vehicles, Construction, Preventive Maintenance and Planning) - Regional Apportionment

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are responsible for sub-allocating projects within their jurisdiction:

Subrecipient

Project

Description

Federal

Share

Local Share

(Excluding Toll

Credit)

Toll Credit

Amount (if any)

Net Project Cost

Program of

Projects

Document

Year

Programmed

Date or

Amendment

Number

Capital Assistance Funds Total:

$ 0

Instructions:

PART 0 – CARES and CRRSAA

• The supplemental funding will be provided at 100-percent federal share,

with no local match required. Funding will support expenses eligible under

the relevant program, although the Act directs recipients to prioritize

payroll and operational needs.

• The CRRSAA funds do not expire.

• Pre-award authority for all Operating projects starting on January 20, 2020

• Funds will not need to be programmed UNLESS your agency applies for a

Capital project beyond the COVID-19 Response

• Final approval to be determined by the Division of Rail and Mass Transit