Fillable March 23, 2021 TO: Member Agencies and Interested (Kern Council of Governments)

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank March 23, 2021 TO: Member Agencies and Interested (Kern Council of Governments) Form

Use Fill to complete blank online KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (CALIFORNIA) pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

March 23, 2021 TO: Member Agencies and Interested (Kern Council of Governments)

On average this form takes 12 minutes to complete

The March 23, 2021 TO: Member Agencies and Interested (Kern Council of Governments) form is 3 pages long and contains:

  • 0 signatures
  • 0 check-boxes
  • 46 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

Use our library of forms to quickly fill and sign your Kern Council of Governments (California) forms online.

BROWSE KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (CALIFORNIA) FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
Kern Council of Governments
1401 19
th
Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (661) 635-2900 Facsimile (661) 324-8215 TTY (661) 832-7433 www.kerncog.org
March 23, 2021
TO: Member Agencies and Interested Persons
FROM: AHRON HAKIMI,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
By: Raquel Pacheco,
Regional Planner
SUBJECT: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program
Call for Projects Application Package
On March 18, 2021, the Kern Council of Governments’ (Kern COG) Board of Directors approved a
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program call for projects. The following items have
been assembled to assist member agency staff and interested persons applying for CMAQ funding.
Please see attachments for more details.
• Project Application – The application and instructions are enclosed. The application package
is available on the Kern COG website at www.kerncog.org/call-for-projects/. CMAQ Program
project applications are due by 5:00 PM on Thursday, August 12, 2021. Please submit
completed application with transmittal letter on agency letterhead to:
Attn: Raquel Pacheco
Kern Council of Governments
1401 19
th
St., Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Send electronically: digitally Via Dropbox link OR via mail on flash drive
• CMAQ Program Policy and Procedure – The CMAQ Policy and Procedure is provided to
explain that funding can be used to maintain and improve the existing transportation system,
expand the system to reduce congestion, and to establish programs and projects that will
assist the region in reducing mobile emissions and help meet federal air quality standards.
CMAQ funds are reimbursable federal aid funds, subject to the requirements of Title 23,
United States code. Eligible costs for funds under this program includes preliminary
engineering, right-of-way acquisition, capital costs, and construction costs associated with an
eligible activity. If there are any questions regarding eligibility and agency sponsorship, please
contact Kern COG staff.
• CMAQ: Local Cost-Effectiveness Policy – As part of the development of local air quality
measures for the 8-hour Ozone Plan, the San Joaquin Valley COG’s acting in their role as
Federal Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) developed a process across the Valley
for distributing 20% of the CMAQ funds to projects that meet a minimum cost-effectiveness.
Page 2 / CMAQ
• Emission Reduction Calculation Resource – The “Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness
of Funding Air Quality Projects” tool is the standard for calculating emissions reductions.
Please provide documentation of emission input data for each application. For more
information, visit https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/congestion-mitigation-and-air-
quality-improvement-cmaq-program. For projects to pave unpaved roads and shoulders, use
spreadsheets provided on the Kern COG website www.kerncog.org/call-for-projects/ to
calculate PM10 emission reductions.
• Local Agency Adopted Resolution – A resolution where a commitment is made to fund and
implement projects as described in application is required.
• Air District Grant Programs – The Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District Grants website
is http://www.kernair.org/Main_Pages/grants.html. The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District’s Grants and Incentives website is http://valleyair.org/grants/. These grants
should be considered for matching purposes or to fund an entire project.
• Timeline – In January 2022, a final draft CMAQ Program of Projects will be submitted to the
Transportation Technical Advisory Committee and the Transportation Planning Policy
Committee for their review. In February 2022, if the CMAQ Program of Projects is approved,
these projects will be amended into the 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program
(FTIP) and introduced into the Draft 2023 FTIP.
• Proposed Project Review – Kern COG staff will be available by appointment April 19
th
– 23
rd
to review proposed project(s). Email rinvina@kerncog.org or call 661-635-2908 by April 14
th
to
set up an appointment. Kern COG staff will provide project development and submittal
assistance.
Should you have any questions, specifically regarding eligibility, please contact:
Raquel Pacheco at 661-635-2907 or rpacheco@kerncog.org
Rochelle Invina at 661-635-2908 or rinvina@kerncog.org
Joseph Stramaglia at 661-635-2914 or jstramaglia@kerncog.org
Enclosures:
CMAQ Project Application
CMAQ Project Application Instructions
CMAQ Program Policy and Procedure
CMAQ: Local Cost-Effectiveness Policy
Sample Local Agency Resolution
(1) Is the pro
ject included in a local agency-adopted resolution supporting the project? YES NO
(2) Does the proposed project meet basic eligibility requirements? YES NO
(3) Project background and justification: Explain the project in terms of the existing infrastructure, its impact for
service, safety or any other issue that is relevant to the project (attach to application). If the project scope
relates to fueling infrastructure please provide a 3-year fleet conversion plan.
(4) Lead Agency: _______________________________________________________________________________
(5) Project description [(Location:) + (Limits) + (;) + (Improvement/Activity)]
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
(6) Fundi
ng Type PE R/W Const.
Total
Local $ $ $ $
Local $ $ $ $
State $ $ $ $
Federal $ $ $ $
Total $_________ $_________ $_________ $____________
(7) Programming Year by Phase: PE: ________ R/W: ________ Const: _________
(8) VMT Reduction (annual miles): _______________________
(9) VOC Reduction (kg/day): ________________ Additional documentation required. See instructions.
(10) NOx Reduction (kg/day): ________________ Additional documentation required. See instructions.
(11) PM
10
Reduction (kg/day): ________________ Additional documentation required. See instructions.
(12) PM
2.5
Reduction (Kg/day): ________________ Additional documentation required. See instructions.
(13) CO Reduction (kg/day):
________________ Additional documentation required. See instructions.
(14) Cost-Effecti
veness ($/lb): ________________ Additional documentation required. See instructions.
(15) Livability a
nd Safety: Describe how project provides the six benefits; limit to half page per benefit.
(16) Hwy Peak Period LOS Before Project (AM/PM average): _____________
(17) Hwy Peak period LOS After Project (AM/PM average): _____________
(18) Bikeway Peak Period LOS Before Project (AM/PM average):
_____________
(19) Bike
way Peak period LOS After Project (AM/PM average): _____________
(20) Pedestrian Peak period LOS Before Project (AM/PM average): _____________
(21) Pedestrian Peak period LOS After Project (AM/PM average):
_____________
(22) Is the
project identified as a RACM/BACM? YES NO
Application completed by: Date Completed:
E-mail: Phone Number:
Agency:
Address:
Send completed application with transmittal letter on agency letterhead to:
Attn: Raquel Pacheco Kern Council of Governments, 1401 19th Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301
Electronically on a flash drive OR send Digitally via Dropbox, click here
KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program
PROJECT APPLICATION – Due Thursday, August 12, 2021
*Please note this is a PDF fillable form so responses may be typed. Items 1, 2, 7, and 22 are drop downs. Totals in item 6 will automatically calculate.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Yes or No?
Yes or No?
Yes or No?
Select Year
Select Year
Select Year
KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program – Call for Projects
2021 PROJECT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
1. Resolution requirement – All projects submitted for funding must be included in a local agency-adopted
resolution where a commitment is made to fund and implement projects as described in applications. A sample
resolution is provided. When submitting multiple CMAQ project applications, all CMAQ projects may be
included in one CMAQ resolution.
2. Eligibility requirements – Chapter 5 of the Kern COG Project Delivery Policies and Procedures manual provides
information regarding eligible projects funded in the CMAQ program. Please review those eligibility guidelines.
Should there be any question about project eligibility, Kern COG staff should be consulted prior to submittal.
3. Project background and justification - A purpose and need statement for the project, no longer than one page.
Provide relevant information about the need for the project, recent history, safety issues, air quality benefits or
any other information that relates the project to the agencies transportation goals, air quality commitments,
etc.
4. Lead agency - The lead agency is the same agency that will be responsible for delivering the project. That agency
will require a Master Agreement with Caltrans to participate in the federal-aid reimbursement process.
5. Project description – The project description should provide information related to the limits and length,
intersection location, transit vehicle description in terms of passenger size and fuel/engine type, replacement
stock or new service, and route/corridor service information. Example: (Location:) + (Limits) + (;) +
(Improvement/Activity)
6. Funding information – Funding type refers to revenue source description such as: general fund, impact fee,
Transportation Development Act (TDA), etc. The funding chart is broken into local, state, and federal funding
rows, by phase: PE is preliminary engineering; R/W is rights-of-way; and Const is construction. Transit projects
may use the const. phase to indicate their amounts for capital costs. The Local match requirement for CMAQ
funding is 11.47%. This is the minimum amount of local match required for a CMAQ project. Should your agency
choose to increase the local match percentage in the proposed project, indicate that in the table as well. Federal-
aid funding may be matched with local and state funds.
7. Programming year – Projects will be programmed either in federal fiscal year 22/23 or 23/24. The federal fiscal
year begins October 1 each year and ends on September 30
th
of the following year. It is imperative that a project
be initiated and obligated during the year in which it is programmed. For more information, please see Chapter
2 Implementation Procedures Overview of the Kern COG Project Delivery Policies and Procedures available at
www.kerncog.org/call-for-projects/.
KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program – Call for Projects
2021 PROJECT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
8. Through 21.
VMT REDUCTION and EMISSIONS BENEFIT CALCULATIONS:
Use the “Methods to Find the Cost Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects” document from the California
Air Resources Board in Cooperation with Caltrans and CAPCOA, or “Automated Cost-effectiveness Calculation
Tool” (Microsoft Access), available at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/congestion-mitigation-
and-air-quality-improvement-cmaq-program, or the updated version. Kern COG staff shall be consulted prior to
the application deadline to determine if an alternative analysis program or formula should be used outside the
Air Resources Board air quality emission calculation tools. Otherwise all applications are expected to use the
appropriate ARB calculator / formulas.
• The project scope should be described in terms of current conditions and conditions after the project is
completed. This information should then support the technical assumptions for the project.
• Technical assumptions about the project should be provided in detail and include quantity and metrics for
use in the emissions calculations. Information should be provided for the “before” scenario and “after”
scenario.
• The emissions calculation formula used should be written out to facilitate verification and accuracy.
• References to emissions tables used should be provided as necessary to facilitate verification and accuracy.
14. COST BENEFIT CALCULATION - Should there be an issue with finding an appropriate calculator for emissions
benefits calculations or the cost benefit calculator, Kern COG staff should be consulted prior to the application
deadline to allow for appropriate assistance to member agency staff. Kern COG staff should be able to verify
output, the formula used and data used in order for the application to be ranked.
15. LIVABILITY AND SAFETY - Describe whether and how the project provides the six listed livability or safety benefits;
provide no more than a half page response for each benefit. The four Livability benefits are: (1) Will enhance or
reduce the average cost of user mobility through the creation of more convenient transportation options for
travelers; (2) Will improve existing transportation choices by enhancing points of modal connectivity, increasing
the number of modes accommodated on existing assets, or reducing congestion on existing modal assets; (3)
Will improve travel between residential areas and commercial centers and jobs; (4) Will improve accessibility
and transportation services for economically disadvantaged populations, non-drivers, senior citizens, and
persons with disabilities, or make goods, commodities, and services more readily available to these groups. The
two Safety benefits are: (5) Is the existing Accident Rate higher than the average rate for a similar facility, and
does the project reduce the Accident Rate to the average rate or lower? Yes or No and if yes, provide rates and
supporting documentation; and (6) Is the existing Fatality Rate higher than the average rate for a similar facility,
and does the project reduce the Fatality Rate to the average rate or lower? Yes or No and if yes, provide rates
and supporting documentation.
KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program – Call for Projects
2021 PROJECT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
16. through 21. – Provide peak period Level of Service (LOS) for intersection(s) and/or road segments within the
project limits for existing conditions (Before LOS) and estimated LOS after project completion (After LOS). If
applicable, provide Bikeway and/or Pedestrian LOS. If LOS varies within the project limits, provide a weighted
average. LOS should be calculated using methods consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual available at
http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/164718.aspx.
22. Is the project identified as a RACM/BACM? Please contact Kern COG staff to determine if the proposed project
is a Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) or a Best Available Control Measure (BACM).
23. In order to be eligible to receive points, application criteria must be complete. If criteria do not apply, state N/A.
The Kern COG CMAQ Policy requires that calculations be consistently used for all applications. In order to assure
this consistency, additional documentation is required to allow for verification of the methodology, data and
output.
If there are any questions about information in the application or these instructions, please contact:
Raquel Pacheco at 661-635-2907 or rpacheco@kerncog.org
Rochelle Invina at 661-635-2908 or rinvina@kerncog.org
Joseph Stramaglia at 661-635-2914 or jstramaglia@kerncog.org
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-1
Kern Council of Governments
Chapter 5
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
Background……………………………………………………………………………………….….... 5-1
Development Timeline …………………………………………………………………………… 5-2
Figure 5-A: CMAQ Milestones for Project Submittal & Approvals…. 5-3
Programming Guidance…………………………………………………………………….…….. 5-4
Figure 5-B: CMAQ Programming Categories..…..……………………….….. 5-4
Screening Criteria.…….………………………………………………………………….…..…….. 5-5
Project Eligibility.………………......................…………………………………………………5-6
Non-Eligible Projects ………………………………………………………………......…………. 5-13
Ranking Criteria and Point System.…………………………………………………………..5-13
Figure 5-C: Air Pollution Control Districts in the Kern Region......….. 5-14
Figure 5-D: Ozone/Carbon Monoxide Planning Areas...................... 5-14
Figure 5-E: Particulate Matter Planning Areas.................………….….. 5-15
Figure 5-F: Ranking Criteria and Point System Summary.………….….. 5-15
Figure 5-G: CMAQ Performance Measures and Ranking Criteria
Detail.………….…............................................................................... 5-16
CMAQ Local Cost-Effectiveness Policy.………………………………………………….… 5-21
Application Calculation and Reporting Requirements.................................5-22
Background
The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program was established by the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Act of 1991 (1991 ISTEA, Public Law 102-240) and was continued by the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21, Public Law 105-178) and the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) under
23 U.S.C. 149. SAFETEA-LU was scheduled to expire on September 30, 2009, but was extended
through September 30, 2012. On July 6, 2012, the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21
st
Century
Act (MAP-21)” was signed into law and continues the CMAQ program to fund projects likely to
reduce air pollution. MAP-21 provided funding over a two-year period starting October 1, 2012
(FY12-13) and ending September 30, 2014 (FY 13-14) followed by continuing resolutions. The
CMAQ program is continued with the enactment of Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act,
or “FAST Act” which was signed into law on December 4, 2015. It is a 5-year transportation bill.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-2
Kern Council of Governments
CMAQ funding can be used to maintain and improve the existing transportation system, expand
the system to reduce congestion, and to establish programs and projects that will assist the
region in reducing mobile emissions and help meet federal air quality standards. CMAQ funds are
reimbursable federal aid funds, subject to the requirements of Title 23, United States code.
Eligible costs for funds under these programs include preliminary engineering, right-of-way
acquisition, capital costs, and construction costs associated with an eligible activity.
The purpose of developing this policy guidance, procedures and criteria to program CMAQ
projects is to provide a consistent project development framework. It is used to develop a
regionally balanced program of projects while building consensus among member agencies and
the public throughout the planning process. Once locally approved, CMAQ projects must then be
included in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) prior to reimbursement of
federal funding. The federal-aid process to build transportation projects requires substantial
effort from the lead agency to submit paperwork required to process a project once it’s identified
in the FTIP. Therefore, projects should be developed and incorporated into the FTIP in a timely
manner so as to allow sufficient time to deliver them.
Development Timeline
After funding allocations for CMAQ are determined by Caltrans, KCOG shall initiate a call for
projects to develop projects for inclusion into the FTIP, either by amendment into a current FTIP
or included as part of the development of a new FTIP. The Transportation Technical Advisory
Committee (TTAC) meets monthly to review transportation items and recommend actions to the
Transportation Planning Policy Committee (TPPC). Detailed below and in Figure 5-A on the next
page is a list of events leading up to the programming of new CMAQ projects in the FTIP. The
schedule reflects a 12-month time span from the call for projects to inclusion in the FTIP.
KCOG shall first issue a “Call for Projects” announcement to the member agencies at the
Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) meeting and the Transportation
Planning Policy Committee (TPPC) meeting. An application form and instructions giving
specific information regarding what type of projects are eligible and application process
information are distributed. Eligible applicants are organizations that have the ability to
accept and account for federal funding. There is a date established as to when the
applications must be returned to KCOG.
KCOG staff shall first evaluate applications for consistency and accuracy. KCOG shall create a
subcommittee of TTAC volunteers to review and comment on submitted applications. The
subcommittee shall be given the opportunity to ask questions of KCOG staff and project
sponsors during the meeting for clarification and to discuss the merits of each application.
TTAC members shall be invited to participate in a peer review assessment after initial review
by KCOG staff to ensure consistent review of submitted CMAQ applications.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-3
Kern Council of Governments
The initial assignment of points and ranking of projects shall occur after all questions by KCOG
staff, TTAC members, the Board or the public are sufficiently addressed by the applicant in
order for the ranking to have significant value.
During the application review period, KCOG staff will ensure that calculations for emissions
benefits and cost benefits are reviewed to ensure consistency and accuracy.
KCOG staff shall prepare a staff report detailing the findings of the subcommittee and
suggesting the recommended course of action to the TTAC. Upon recommendation of the
TTAC, the projects proposed for funding are forwarded to the TPPC. Upon the approval of the
TPPC the matter is then referred to state and federal agencies for approval. This action
financially constrains new projects to available regional funding levels, and allows KCOG to
program a list of financially constrained projects in transportation improvement program
documents.
Eligibility of projects is subject to state and federal review.
After the federal and state approval of the amended FTIP, the lead agencies may request
authorization to proceed with design for the project if applicable (design is an eligible
expense). Caltrans must review the draft design of the project; and a final plan is developed
incorporating the comments and suggestions resulting from the review.
After the final design plan is approved by Caltrans, the lead agency may then request
authorization to proceed for project construction. After the authorization is received, the lead
agency may then proceed with construction. In most cases, the project is “cost reimbursable”,
meaning that the lead agency must initially finance the project (i.e. buy supplies, pay
contractors) and then submit the expenses to Caltrans for reimbursement, upon approval of
expenditures.
When the project is completed, a Notice of Completion is filed with Caltrans. The project is
field checked by staff and instructions to issue final payment are issued.
These policies and procedures may be revised, updated, or otherwise modified at the
discretion of the KCOG Board of Directors and through state and federal guidance.
Because CMAQ funds are federal funds, project sponsors must follow federal funding guidelines
and environmental (NEPA) processes.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-4
Kern Council of Governments
Figure 5-A: CMAQ Milestones for Project Submittal & Approval
CMAQ Milestones
Month 1, Year 1
CMAQ Allocation estimates received from Caltrans;
Month 2, Year 1
KCOG: reveals the CMAQ apportionment amount(s) available for
programming new projects; establishes percentage funding targets for the
CMAQ programming categories; and requests approval of the call for projects
timeline through the regular committee process.
Month 2, Year 1
Issue a call for projects (4 months);
Month 7, Year 1
Project submittal deadline;
Month 8, Year 2
Evaluate and rank applicable projects; Develop draft program of projects
Month 9 & 10, Year 2
TTAC Subcommittee shall review and comment on applications and initial
rankings;
Month 11, Year 2
Draft program of projects is reviewed by TTAC;
Month 11, Year 2
Draft program of projects is reviewed by TPPC;
Month 12, Year 2
Request recommendation of approval by TTAC of Final List of Projects;
Month 12, Year 2
Request TPPC approval on Final List of Projects.
Note: Additional cycles may be implemented at the discretion of Kern COG staff that follows the time
frame as defined above. Even year = Year 1; Odd year = Year 2
Programming Guidance
The following guidance shall direct the programming of available CMAQ funding over the course
of the FAST Act. The four categories listed in Figure 5-B provide guidance on project categories
that will be identified for funding. Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) and Best
Available Control Measures (BACM) projects are eligible under any category. Projects will
compete within each category separately as recommended by KCOG staff and approved by the
KCOG Board of Directors.
For all categories, lead agencies must demonstrate the ability to process projects in a timely
manner so that funding is not lost to the Kern region due to delays or mismanagement. Air quality
benefits of all projects or activities shall be quantified and documented before CMAQ funding is
approved. Caltrans submits an annual report to FHWA covering all CMAQ obligations for the fiscal
year ending the previous September 30. This report documents how CMAQ funds were spent
and what the air quality benefits are expected to be.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-5
Kern Council of Governments
Figure 5-B: CMAQ Programming Categories
Screening Criteria
Proposed CMAQ projects must meet all of the following screening requirements, where
applicable. If a proposal meets all of the applicable criteria, it is eligible for prioritization; if not,
it cannot be considered for funding.
Project must be included in a local agency-adopted resolution stating financial support for
the project.
Project is eligible for CMAQ funding as defined by the latest federal transportation
authorization bill and federal CMAQ Guidelines.
Project applicant is either a public agency, i.e. city, county, special district, Caltrans, transit
operator, transit authority, or a non-profit agency or group with the sponsorship of a public
agency.
Successful project applicants or their sponsors must have executed a master agreement with
Caltrans in order to be authorized to expend funds for reimbursement under this program.
Agencies without a master agreement will either need to obtain one or the sponsorship of an
agency that does have one.
Road projects must have a functional classification of urban collector, or major rural
collectors or higher.
CMAQ Programming Categories
Category 1:
Public Transit Projects
Eligible projects shall include but are not limited to transit stock and transit
amenity improvements. A 3-year fleet conversion plan shall be required for
alternative refueling infrastructure. Projects shall be distributed across: small
urban areas; regional transit; and metropolitan transit.
Category 2:
Alternative Fuel &
Infrastructure Projects
Eligible projects may include advanced clean engine technology for non-transit
vehicles and refueling infrastructure. Refueling infrastructure projects shall
require a 3-year fleet conversion plan outlining how the refueling project will
either expand, replace or transition vehicle technology within the agency and
identified committed partners, and how they will serve those vehicles during
operational peak-periods and non-peak periods. The fleet conversion plan must
be specific to the project location and surrounding need.
Category 3:
Transportation System
Management Projects
Eligible projects: Transportation System Management (TSM) projects shall
include traffic signal interconnect projects, operational improvements and Traffic
Operation Center projects in the metropolitan Bakersfield area.
Category 4:
Discretionary Projects
Eligible projects: The Discretionary Projects Category may include projects such
as dust mitigation
reductions, non-motorized projects, safety / traffic flow
projects, freight/goods movement projects, (Active) Transportation Demand
Management, or TSM projects outside of the Metropolitan Bakersfield area that
can demonstrate an air quality benefit to the non-attainment area.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-6
Kern Council of Governments
CMAQ projects must demonstrate a tangible benefit to air quality. CMAQ funded projects are
required to quantify or qualify their benefit as part of annual reporting requirements.
The project must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
The project must be consistent with the currently approved Regional Transportation Plan.
The applicant or their sponsor must have financial capacity to complete, operate and
maintain the project.
Funds required from other sources must reasonably expected to be available on the time
frame needed to carry out the project.
Project Eligibility
The purpose of the CMAQ program is to fund transportation projects or programs that will
improve safety, reduce congestion, and contribute to attainment of national ambient air quality
standards with a focus on ozone, PM
10
, and their precursors, and precursors of carbon dioxide
(CO
2
): PM
2.5
; volatile organic compounds (VOC); nitrogen oxides (NOx); and Carbon Monoxide.
The CMAQ Program Eligibility Listing has been refined to provide local governments with greater
flexibility in choosing the types of projects that will provide the "greatest air quality benefits" for
their regions in order to meet national goals and standard.
A state or MPO may obligate CMAQ funds apportioned to it only for a transportation project or
program:
If the DOT in consultation with the EPA determines that the project or program is likely to
contribute to the attainment of a national ambient air quality standard; or
If the project or program is included in a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that has been
approved pursuant to the Clean Air Act and the project will have air quality benefits; or
The project or program is likely to contribute to the attainment of a national ambient air
quality standard, whether through reductions in vehicle miles traveled, fuel consumption, or
through other factors.
Transportation Activities
Transportation activities from approved state SIPs for air quality should be given highest
priority for CMAQ funding. The priority of CMAQ funded projects in the FTIP will be based on
their air quality benefits.
Transportation Control Measures
The fundable TCMs below are included in Section 108(f)(1) of the Clean Air Act and meet the
transportation conformity rule’s definition of a TCM (included in approved SIP):
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-7
Kern Council of Governments
o Programs for improved public transit;
o Restriction of certain roads or lanes to, or construction of such roads or lanes for use
by passenger buses or high occupancy vehicles;
o Employer-based transportation management plans, including incentives;
o Trip-reduction ordinances;
o Traffic flow improvement programs that achieve emission reductions;
o Fringe and transportation corridor parking facilities serving multiple occupancy vehicle
programs or transit service;
o Programs to limit or restrict vehicle use in downtown areas or other areas of emission
concentration particularly during periods of peak use;
o Programs for the provision of all forms of high-occupancy, shared-ride services;
o Programs to limit portions of road surfaces or certain sections of the metropolitan area
to the use of non-motorized vehicles or pedestrian use, both as to time and place;
o Programs for secure bicycle storage facilities and other facilities, including bicycle lanes,
for the convenience and protection of bicyclists, in both public and private areas;
o Programs to control extended idling of vehicles;
o Programs to reduce motor vehicle emissions, consistent with title II, which are caused
by extreme cold start conditions;
o Employer-sponsored programs to permit flexible work schedules;
o Programs and ordinances to facilitate non-automobile travel, provision and utilization
of mass transit, and to generally reduce the need for single-occupant vehicle travel, as
part of transportation planning and development efforts of a locality, including
programs and ordinances applicable to new shopping centers, special events, and other
centers of vehicle activity;
o Programs for new construction and major reconstructions of paths, tracks or areas
solely for the use by pedestrian or other non-motorized means of transportation when
economically feasible and in the public interest; and
o Programs to encourage the voluntary removal from use and the marketplace of pre-
1980 model year light duty vehicles and pre-1980 model light duty trucks.
Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities & Programs
Construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, non-construction projects related to safe
bicycle use, and State bicycle/pedestrian coordinator positions for promoting and facilitating
the increased use of non-motorized modes of transportation. This includes public education,
promotional, and safety programs for using such facilities.
Management and Monitoring Systems
Developing and establishing management systems for traffic congestion, public
transportation facilities and equipment, and intermodal transportation facilities and systems,
where it can be demonstrated that they are likely to contribute to the attainment of a
National Ambient Air Quality Standard.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-8
Kern Council of Governments
Traffic Management / Congestion Relief Strategies
Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management, and control facilities and
programs, where it can be demonstrated that they are likely to contribute to the attainment
of a National Ambient Air Quality Standard. In addition to traffic signal modernization
projects destined to improve traffic flow within a corridor or throughout an area, CMAQ
funding can also be utilized to support Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure (ITI) Traffic
Management and Traveler Information Systems that may include: Regional Multi modal
Traveler Information Centers; Traffic Signal Control Systems; Freeway Management Systems;
Traffic Management Systems; Incident Management Programs; and Electronic fare
Payment/Toll collection Systems. CMAQ program funds may not replace existing local and
State Funds used for operating cost, but are intended to augment and reinforce new efforts.
Operating costs are eligible only for a period of 2 years from inception. Operating costs for
these services are eligible under RSTP.
Transit Projects
Improved public transit is an eligible TCM. Transit improvements fall under three broad types
of action: system/service expansion, operational improvements, and demand/market
strategies. Emission reductions vary widely depending on project specifics as well as the
existence of policies and actions that promote transit use, such as transit-supportive land use
controls and single-occupant auto disincentives.
o Transit facilities - In general, capital costs of system/service expansion are eligible.
Examples include new rail systems and extensions, new roadways or reserved lanes on
existing roads for exclusive bus/HOV use, and capital costs of initiating commuter rail or
ferry service. Enhancements such as new stations, new vehicles/equipment, terminals,
transit malls, Intermodal transfer facilities, and track and signalization improvements are
also eligible. If it is a reconstruction or rehabilitation project of an existing facility, it is not
eligible. Park and ride facilities related to transit systems are eligible.
o Transit vehicles and equipment - One-for-one vehicle replacements of the existing bus
or rail fleet are eligible because other new vehicles are generally more reliable, less
polluting, and make transit a more attractive option. New buses are significantly cleaner
than old with respect to PM10; thus justification is strong for using CMAQ funds for
replacements in PM10 non-attainment areas like Kern County.
o Transit associated development - This includes various types of retail and other services
located in or very close to transit facilities. They offer convenience for the transit patron
but are not required for the functioning of the system. In general, transit-associated
development is not eligible under the CMAQ Program. Child-care centers located adjacent
to a major transit stop have been proposed in the past as beneficial to air quality. The
type of use could now be funded as an experimental pilot project. Such type of uses could
possibly help support mandated “Welfare to Work” Programs.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-9
Kern Council of Governments
o Transit Operations - In limited cases, operating costs for new transit service are eligible.
The main criterion is that it must be for new service, which supports a discrete, new
project or program having documented air quality benefits. The funds cannot be used to
replace existing funding sources or to further subsidize existing operations. Operating
costs are eligible only for a 3-year start-up period. Examples of eligible costs include
shuttle service feeding a station; circulator service within an activity center; fixed-route
service linking activity center new transit service to a major employer in support of an
employer trip reduction program; new bus service in a community that presently lacks
adequate transit service; or new transit service initiated on a HOV facility. Service
demonstrations will usually involve buses or vans since the service should be relatively
low-cost and easily terminated if sufficient ridership is not achieved. In addition to
operating assistance for new transit service, the CMAQ Guidance also allows partial short-
term subsidies of transit/paratransit fares as a means of encouraging transit use.
Proposals such as reduced fare programs during periods of elevated ozone levels (such as
a spare the air day) and discounted transit passes targeted at specific groups or locations
may now be eligible if these conditions are met.
Planning and Project Development Activities
Project planning or other development activities that lead directly to construction of facilities
or new services and programs with air quality benefits. Such as preliminary engineering or
major investment studies for transportation /air quality projects, are eligible. This includes
studies for the preparation of environmental or NEPA documents and related
transportation/air quality project development activities. Project development studies
include planning directly related to an event that air quality monitoring is necessary to
determine the air quality impacts of a proposed project, which is eligible for CMAQ funding,
the costs of that monitoring are also eligible. General planning activities, such as economic
or demographic studies, that do not directly propose or support a transportation/air quality
project are too far removed from project development to ensure any emission reductions
and are not eligible for funding. Regional or area-wide air quality monitoring is not eligible
because such projects do not themselves yield air quality improvements nor do they lead
directly to projects that would yield air quality benefits.
Alternative Fuels
In general, the conversion of individual, conventionally powered vehicles to alternative fuels
is not eligible under CMAQ. However, the conversion of replacement of centrally fueled fleets
to alternative fuels is eligible. The establishment of on-site fueling facilities and other
infrastructure needed to fill alternative fueled vehicles are also eligible expenses. Although,
if private filing stations are reasonably accessible and convenient, then CMAQ funds may not
be used. Interference with private enterprise is to be avoided and services should not be
needlessly duplicated.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-10
Kern Council of Governments
Telecommuting
The CMAQ Program allows for the establishment of telecommuting programs. Planning,
technical and feasibility studies, training, coordination, and promotion are eligible activities
under CMAQ. Physical establishment of telecommuting centers, computer and office
equipment purchases and related activities are not eligible. Such activities are not typically
transportation projects and funding them would not meet current federal requirements.
Travel Demand Management
Travel demand management encompasses a diverse set of activities ranging from traditional
car pool and vanpool programs to more innovative parking management and road pricing
measures. Eligible activities include: market research and planning in support of TDM
implementation; capital expenses required to implement TDM measures; operating
assistance to administer and manage TDM programs for up to 3 years; as well as marketing
and public education efforts to support and bolster TDM measures.
Intermodal Freight
CMAQ funds may be used for improved intermodal freight facilities where air quality benefits
can be shown. Capital improvements as well as operating assistance meeting the conditions
of this guidance are eligible. In that many intermodal freight facilities included private sector
businesses, several of the proposals that have been funded nation-wide have been under
public-private partnerships.
Public/Private Initiatives
SAFETEA-LU provides greater access to CMAQ funds for projects that cooperatively
implemented by public/private partnerships and/or non-profit entities. Proposed projects
no longer have to be under the primary control of the cooperating public agency as under
ISTEA; although, it is still the responsibility of the public agency to oversee and protect the
investment of the Federal funds used by the partnership. Eligible activities include the
following: ownership or operation of land, facilities or other physical management or
operational duties associated with a project; and any other form of privately owned vehicles
and fleets using alternative fuels to the incremental vehicle cost over a conventionally-fueled
vehicle. Activities that are the mandated responsibility of the private sector under the Clean
Air Act, such as vapor recovery systems at gas stations, are not eligible for CMAQ funding.
Implementation of employer trip reduction programs is also a private responsibility, but
general program assistance to employers to help them plan and promote these programs is
eligible.
PM-10 Activities
Projects and programs that reduce transportation generated PM10 emissions are eligible for
CMAQ funding. Specifically projects qualifying as “control strategies” identified in the Air
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-11
Kern Council of Governments
District’s PM10 Attainment Plan including the following: paving shoulders, shoulder
stabilization, paving or stabilizing unpaved roads, and curbing.
Outreach Activities
Outreach activities, such as public education on transportation and air quality, advertising of
transportation alternatives to Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) travel, and technical assistance
to employers or other outreach activities for Employee Commute Option program
implementation are eligible for CMAQ funding. The previous policy limiting CMAQ funding
for only a two-year period has been eliminated. Now, outreach activities may be funded
under the CMAQ program for an indefinite period. Outreach activities may be employed for
a wide variety of transportation services. They may equally affect new and existing transit,
shared ride, traffic management and control, bicycle and pedestrian, and other
transportation services.
Rideshare Programs
Rideshare services consist of carpool and vanpool programs; important activities may include
computer matching of individuals seeking to vanpool and employer outreach to establish
rideshare programs. New or expanded rideshare programs, such as new locations for
matching services, upgrades for computer matching software, etc. continue to be eligible and
may be funded for an indefinite period of time. Vanpool programs are different from
carpooling programs. Implementation of a vanpool operation entails purchasing vehicles and
providing a transportation service. Proposals for vanpool activities must be for new or
expanded service, subject to the 3-year limitation on operation costs.
Establishing/Contracting with TMA’s
Transportation Management Associations (TMA’s) are comprised of private individuals or
firms who organize to address the transportation issues in their immediate locale. Such
Associations are currently eligible for CMAQ funding. Eligible expenses for reimbursement
are associated start-up costs for up to 3 years. CMAQ requires that the TMA’s must be
sponsored by a public agency, and the State is responsible for insuring that funds are
appropriately used to meeting CMAQ program objectives. The TMA’s may play a role in
brokering transportation services to private employers--such as: coordinating rideshare
programs, provided shuttle services, and developing parking management programs, etc.
Applications of these programs must specify program goals and deliverables.
Inspection/Maintenance Activities
Emission Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) programs are eligible activities under CMAQ. I/M
program funds can be provided for publicly owner I/M facilities-or at privately owned stations
where a “public-private partnership” is created. Start-up costs and three years of operating
expenses are eligible for CMAQ funds. The establishment of “portable” I/M programs is also
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-12
Kern Council of Governments
eligible under the CMAQ program, provided that they are public services, contribute to
emission reductions and do not conflict with statutory I/M requirements.
Experimental Pilot Projects/Innovative Financing
States and local areas have long experimented with various types of transportation services,
and different means of employing them in an effort to better meet the travel needs of their
constituents. These “experimental” projects may not meet the precise eligibility criteria for
Federal and State funding programs, but they may show promise in meeting the intended
public purpose of those programs in an innovative way. The CMAQ provisions of TEA-21 allow
experimentation provided that the project or program can reasonably be defined as a
“transportation” project and that emission reductions can reasonably be expected “though
reductions in vehicle miles traveled, fuel consumption, or through other factors.”
Fare/Fee Subsidy Program
The CMAQ Program allows funding for partial user fare or fee subsidies in order to encourage
greater use of alternative travel modes (e.g. carpool, vanpool, transit, bicycling and walking).
CMAQ funds can be used to subsidize fares or fees if the reduced fare/fee is offered as a
component of a comprehensive, targeted program to reduce SOV use. Other components of
such a program would include public information and marketing of non-SOV alternatives,
parking management measures, and better coordination of existing transportation services.
The intent of federal policy on this is to focus on situations where alternative transportation
modes are viable, but nonetheless, heavy reliance on single-occupant vehicles exists, such as
at major employment or activity centers. Examples of fare-fee subsidy programs include the
following: 1) discount transit fare through a cooperative arrangement between a transit
operator and a major employer; 2) subsidize empty seats during the formation of a new
vanpool; 3) reduce fees for shuttle services within a defined area, such as a flat-fare taxi
program; or 4) provide financial incentives for carpooling, bicycling and walking in
conjunction with a demand management program. An underlying tenet of this provision is to
support experimentation but always with the goal of identifying projects that are viable
without the short-term funding assistance provided by the CMAQ program. Thus, the subsidy
must be used in conjunction with reasonable fares or fees to allow the greatest change of
holding on the “trial” users. While the fare/fee subsidy program itself is not limited in time,
specific groups or locals targeted under the program must be rotated and the subsidized
fare/fee must be limited to any one entity or location.
Other Eligible Activities
Innovative activities based on promising technologies and feasible approaches to improve air
quality will also be considered for funding. This includes such ventures as new efforts to
identify and prove the emissions of gross emitters, vanpooling programs, planning and
development of parking management program, and preferential treatment for high-
occupancy vehicles.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-13
Kern Council of Governments
The eligible activities listed above are subject to federal interpretation and the latest CMAQ
Guidance.
Non-Eligible Projects
General planning activities, even for conformity of implementation plan revisions, are not
eligible for CMAQ funding.
Routine maintenance projects are ineligible. Routine maintenance and rehabilitation on
existing facilities maintains the existing levels of highway and transit service and, therefore,
maintains existing ambient air quality levels rather than improving them.
Funding for a project that will result in the construction of new capacity available to single-
occupant vehicles unless the project consists of a high-occupancy vehicle facility available to
single-occupant vehicles only at other than peak travel times.
Planning activities/modal enhancements required for conformity findings.
Preparation of Transportation Improvement Programs and plan development.
Air quality monitoring systems.
The use of funds for non-governmental partnerships on projects required under the Clean Air
Act, the Energy Policy Act, or other federal laws.
Ranking Criteria and Point System
CMAQ projects must first meet federal requirements, such as be on an eligible route, be an
eligible type of project and, finally, meet air quality standards. CMAQ funds can be used for transit
capital improvements, for high occupancy vehicle lanes, and to alleviate PM
10
. CMAQ funds may
not be used for highway maintenance, transit-operating expenses or for capacity increasing lanes
available to single occupancy vehicles. Having met the above standards, the KCOG criteria for
selecting CMAQ projects are listed in Figure 5-F (page 5-15) and Figure 5-G (page 5-16). Please
note the criteria will not apply to all project types. For example, the safety criteria will not apply
to most transit projects because the scoring is based on road safety data. This difference in total
possible points between project types is resolved by having projects compete separately within
Programming Categories presented in Figure B on page 5-4.
The air quality maps in Figures 5-C, 5-D, and 5-E on the next two pages are included to guide
applicants in determining project eligibility, and to identify the air district for each project for
scoring purposes.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-14
Kern Council of Governments
Figure 5-C: Air Pollution Control Districts in the Kern Region
Figure 5-D: Ozone/Carbon Monoxide Planning Areas
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-15
Kern Council of Governments
Figure 5-E: Particulate Matter Planning Areas
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-16
Kern Council of Governments
Figure 5-F: Ranking Criteria and Point System Summary
Screening Criteria
YES / NO
Does the proposed project meet all of the CMAQ screening
criteria listed on Page 5-5 of the KCOG Project Delivery
Policies and Procedures manual?
The project is not
eligible if the
answer is no.
General Criteria
100
VMT Reduction*
15
Emissions Reduction*
25
BACM/RACM?*
5
Livability and Safety*
15
Congestion (LOS)*
25
Cost-Effectiveness
15
Max 100 Points
Note: Projects compete separately within each of the four categories based on project type.
*KCOG SCS framework-related metrics.
LEVERAGING OF LOCAL MATCH
KCOG staff shall note whether a project has included local match which exceeds the statutory requirement
of 11.47% in most cases. Projects which indicate a 50% match or higher and less than 75% shall be
considered only in the case of a tie-breaker situation during the financial constraint process in which two
like projects also have the same number of points. Projects that demonstration a local match of 75% or
higher shall be awarded an extra 5 points for their project and will compete as normal. Again, if the project
that is awarded the extra points ties with another project that does not have the extra match the project
with the extra match will be selected. KCOG staff shall apply this option at their discretion during the
financial constraint process.
Figure 5-G: CMAQ Performance Measures and Ranking Criteria Detail
General Criteria
VMT Reduction
Estimate the reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) using the program titled “Methods to Find the Cost
Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects”, General Methods Program (Microsoft Access), from the
California Air Resources Board in Cooperation with Caltrans and CAPCOA, available at
http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/tsaq/eval/eval.htm, or the updated version.
Note: projects are ranked relative to all other projects competing for funds.
Ranking Criteria (projects are ranked relative to all other projects competing for funds)
Points
Top 1/3
rd
(68% - 100%) of projects with the highest VMT reduction
Middle 1/3
rd
(34% - 67%) of projects with mid-range VMT reduction
Bottom 1/3
rd
(1% - 33%) of projects with the lowest VMT reduction
No reduction
15
12
8
0
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-17
Kern Council of Governments
Emissions Reduction
Estimate the reduction in emissions using the program titled “Methods to Find the Cost Effectiveness of
Funding Air Quality Projects”, General Methods Program (Microsoft Access), from the California Air Resources
Board in Cooperation with Caltrans and CAPCOA, available at
http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/tsaq/eval/eval.htm, or the updated version. Kern COG staff shall be
consulted prior the application deadline to determine is an alternative analysis program or formula should be
used outside the Air Resources Board air quality emission calculation tools. Otherwise all applications are
expected to use the appropriate ARB calculator / formulas. Note: projects are ranked relative to all other
projects competing for funds.
Emissions Reduction Ranking Criteria
1
Pollutant
(kg/yr)
San Joaquin
Valley Air Basin
2
Kern River Valley
Air Basin
3
Mojave Air Basin
4
Indian Wells
Valley Air Basin
5
PM
10
Top 90% - 100% = 8
Top 80% - 89% = 7
Top 70% - 79% = 5
Top 60% - 69% = 3
Top 50% - 59% = 2
Top 90% - 100% = 8
Top 80% - 89% = 7
Top 70% - 79% = 5
Top 60% - 69% = 3
Top 50% - 59% = 2
Top 90% - 100% = 8
Top 80% - 89% = 7
Top 70% - 79% = 5
Top 60% - 69% = 3
Top 50% - 59% = 2
Top 90% - 100% = 8
Top 80% - 89% = 7
Top 70% - 79% = 5
Top 60% - 69% = 3
Top 50% - 59% = 2
VOC
Top 90% - 100% = 7
Top 80% - 89% = 5
Top 70% - 79% = 3
Top 60% - 69% = 2
Top 90% - 100% = 7
Top 80% - 89% = 5
Top 70% - 79% = 3
Top 60% - 69% = 2
Top 90% - 100% = 7
Top 80% - 89% = 5
Top 70% - 79% = 3
Top 60% - 69% = 2
NO
X
Top 90% - 100% = 5
Top 80% - 89% = 3
Top 70% - 79% = 2
Top 90% - 100% = 5
Top 80% - 89% = 3
Top 70% - 79% = 2
Top 90% - 100% = 5
Top 80% - 89% = 3
Top 70% - 79% = 2
PM
2.5
Any reduction = 3
CO
Any reduction = 2
6
Max Points = 25
Max Points = 20
Max Points = 20
Max Points = 8
1
Note:
Project eligibility is ultimately determined by FHWA through Caltrans Local Assistance when the project sponsor
submits the Request for Authorization (E-76) to Caltrans to obligate the CMAQ funds. When CMAQ guidelines under
MAP-21 are available, the KCOG CMAQ project selection process will be reviewed and updated as required.
2
Classified non-attainment for four pollutants (PM
10
, Ozone, PM2.5 & CO).
3
Classified non-attainment for two pollutants (PM10, Ozone).
4
Classified non-attainment for one pollutant (Ozone).
5
Classified maintenance for one pollutant (PM
10
).
6
Only applies to projects within the Bakersfield Metropolitan Area.
Livability and Safety
Livability - Describe whether and how the project provides the four listed Livability benefits; provide no more
than a half page response for each benefit: (1) Will enhance or reduce the average cost of user mobility
through the creation of more convenient transportation options for travelers; (2) Will improve existing
transportation choices by enhancing points of modal connectivity, increasing the number of modes
accommodated on existing assets, or reducing congestion on existing modal assets; (3) Will improve travel
between residential areas and commercial centers and jobs; (4) Will improve accessibility and transportation
services for economically disadvantaged populations, non-drivers, senior citizens, and persons with
disabilities, or make goods, commodities, and services more readily available to these groups.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-18
Kern Council of Governments
Safety - Provide: (a) Existing and After project accident & fatality rates (accidents/millions of vehicle miles
(MVM); fatalities/MVM) for the road segment within the project limits using three years of accident data, and
(b) the statewide average accident and fatality rate for a similar facility (from Caltrans TASAS database or local
agency accident database). Instructions for obtaining project accident and fatality rates are available on pages
B-21 and B-22 of Appendix B. Answer the following two questions (5) and (6) based on the calculated values
for accident rates and fatality rates as described above in items (a) and (b).
(5) Is the existing Accident Rate higher than the average rate for a similar facility, and does the
project reduce the Accident Rate to the average rate or lower? Yes or No
(6) Is the existing Fatality Rate higher than the average rate for a similar facility, and does the
project reduce the Fatality Rate to the average rate or lower? Yes or No
Ranking Criteria
Points
Project provides five of the six listed Livability or Safety benefits
Project provides three of the six listed Livability or Safety benefits
Project provides two of the six listed Livability or Safety benefits
Project provides one of the six listed Livability or Safety benefits
15
10
5
1
Congestion Relief
Provide peak period Level of Service (LOS) for intersection(s) and/or road segments within the project limits
for existing conditions (Before LOS) and estimated LOS after project completion (After LOS). If applicable,
provide Bikeway and/or Pedestrian LOS. If LOS varies within the project limits, provide a weighted average.
LOS should be calculated using methods consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual available at
http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/164718.aspx. Ranking criteria is summarized in the tables below.
Highways
(where bicycles and pedestrians are prohibited)
Points are awarded to projects based on the change in LOS before and after project completion using the
table below.
After LOS Hwy
Before LOS
Hwy
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
5
0
0
0
0
0
C
10
5
0
0
0
0
D
15
10
5
0
0
0
E
20
15
10
5
0
0
F
25
20
15
10
5
0
Max Points = 25
________________________________________________
OR
(Next page)
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-19
Kern Council of Governments
Highways & Bicycle Lanes
(when bicycles are allowed on the highway but pedestrians are prohibited)
Points are awarded to projects based on the change in LOS before and after project completion using the two
tables below for highway and bikeway facilities.
After LOS Hwy
Before LOS
Hwy
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
4
0
0
0
0
0
C
8
4
0
0
0
0
D
12
8
4
0
0
0
E
16
12
8
4
0
0
F
20
16
12
8
4
0
Plus Bikeway LOS:
After LOS Bikeway
Before LOS
Bikeway
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
1
0
0
0
0
0
C
2
1
0
0
0
0
D
3
2
1
0
0
0
E
4
3
2
1
0
0
F
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Points Highway LOS (20 Points) + Bikeway LOS (5 Points) = 25
________________________________________________
OR
(Next page)
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-20
Kern Council of Governments
Highways, Bicycle Lanes and Pedestrian Facilities
(when bicycles and pedestrians are allowed on the highway)
Points are awarded to projects based on the change in LOS before and after project completion using the
three tables below for highway, bikeway and pedestrian facilities respectively.
After LOS Hwy
Before LOS
Hwy
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
3
0
0
0
0
0
C
6
3
0
0
0
0
D
9
6
3
0
0
0
E
12
9
6
3
0
0
F
15
12
9
6
3
0
Plus Bikeway LOS:
After LOS Bikeway
Before LOS
Bikeway
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
1
0
0
0
0
0
C
2
1
0
0
0
0
D
3
2
1
0
0
0
E
4
3
2
1
0
0
F
5
4
3
2
1
0
Plus Pedestrian LOS:
After LOS Pedestrian
Before LOS
Pedestrian
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
1
0
0
0
0
0
C
2
1
0
0
0
0
D
3
2
1
0
0
0
E
4
3
2
1
0
0
F
5
4
3
2
1
0
Max Points Highway LOS (15 Points) + Bikeway LOS (5 Points) + Pedestrian LOS (5 Points) = 25
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-21
Kern Council of Governments
Cost-Effectiveness
Calculate cost-effectiveness using the program titled “Methods to Find the Cost Effectiveness of Funding Air
Quality Projects”, General Methods Program (Microsoft Access), from the California Air Resources Board in
Cooperation with Caltrans and CAPCOA, available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/tsaq/eval/eval.htm, or
the updated version.
Ranking Criteria
Points
Project does not exceed the Cost-Effectiveness Threshold
Project exceeds the Cost-Effectiveness Threshold by not more than 50%
Project exceeds the Cost-Effectiveness Threshold by not more than 100%
15
10
5
RACM/BACM
Is the project identified as a RACM/BACM?
Ranking Criteria
Points
Yes
No
5
0
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-22
Kern Council of Governments
CMAQ: LOCAL COST- EFFECTIVENESS POLICY
The following three pages present the local cost-effectiveness policy adopted by Kern COG in
September 2007.
Summary
The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program provides funding for transportation
projects or programs that will contribute to attainment or maintenance of the national ambient
air quality standards. The CMAQ program supports two important goals of the Department of
Transportation: improving air quality and relieving congestion. SAFETEA-LU strengthens these
goals by establishing priority consideration for cost-effective emission reduction and congestion
mitigation activities. Exhibit A provides a summary of the policy for distributing at least 20% of
the CMAQ funds to projects that meet a minimum cost-effectiveness threshold for emission
reduction beginning in FY 2011. This policy will focus on achieving the most cost-effective
emission reductions, while maintaining flexibility to meet local needs.
Estimates of Available Funds
Caltrans Programming provides apportionment estimates to all regions of the state. The FTIP is
currently developed for a four-year programming cycle; with each new FTIP document, Kern COG
will use the Caltrans estimate to develop the available CMAQ funds over the four-year period.
Kern COG commits to dedicate at least 20% (or insert larger percentage, if appropriate) of the
total funding for the four-year period of each FTIP as part of the local cost-effectiveness CMAQ
policy. For example, if an agency were estimated to receive $20 million over a four-year period,
it would allocate 20%, or $4 million, of the CMAQ program to projects that meet a minimum cost-
effectiveness.
The CMAQ allocation formula is currently based on population, ozone status, and carbon
monoxide status. Revisions to the formula or updates to estimates may result in changes to
available funds for the Kern COG CMAQ program; such updates will also affect the funds available
for the local cost-effectiveness policy. CMAQ estimates may be revised at any time due to
changes from Caltrans, Federal legislation, or classification of the air quality standards in the San
Joaquin Valley.
Timeframe
The local cost-effectiveness CMAQ policy is scheduled to be implemented in FY 2011 because the
current federally approved 2007 Federal Transportation Improvements Programs (FTIPs) have
committed CMAQ funds through FY 2009 and in some cases, regional commitments through FY
2010. In addition, the current CMAQ programming assists in implementing approved local RACM
(Amended 2003 PM-10 Plan) that are committed through 2010.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-23
Kern Council of Governments
The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin is currently classified as a serious ozone non-attainment area
with an attainment deadline of 2013. As part of the 2007 Ozone plan, the Air District is requesting
an “extreme” classification, which would delay the attainment deadline until 2023. If approved
and assuming no change to the current funding formula, the MPOs may continue to receive
CMAQ funding through that time (2023). The local cost-effectiveness CMAQ policy may remain
in effect through 2023; however, continuation of the policy will be reviewed on a regular basis
per the Policy Review section below.
Local Allocation of Funds
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released new CMAQ guidance based on SAFETEA-
LU on October 31, 2006. The new legislation and guidance clarifies project eligibility, including
advanced truck stop electrification systems and the purchase of diesel retrofits. SAFETEA-LU
directs States and MPOs to give priority to diesel retrofits and to use cost-effective congestion
mitigation activities that provide air quality benefits. Though SAFETEA-LU establishes these
investment priorities, it also retains State and local agencies’ authority in project selection,
meaning that changes to local procedures are not required by SAFETEA-LU. Kern COG has
previously developed procedures for allocating CMAQ funds; the local cost-effectiveness CMAQ
policy will be incorporated into existing procedures. Prioritization and funding of projects will
continue to be based on criteria developed by Kern COG.
Cost-Effectiveness Threshold
Cost-effectiveness is a key component of providing funding to projects that improve air quality
and reduce congestion. The cost-effectiveness of an air quality project is based on the amount of
pollution it eliminates for each dollar spent. Policies that focus on cost-effectiveness will result in
the largest emission reductions for the lowest cost. Cost-effectiveness can be based on total
project costs, including capital investments and operating costs. However, for the purposes of
this policy, cost-effectiveness is based on CMAQ funding dollars only.
In the state of California, the Air Resources Board (ARB) provides funding for air quality
improvement projects through the Carl Moyer Program, which requires that heavy-duty vehicle
projects meet a cost-effectiveness threshold. The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
(SJVAPCD) also uses cost-effectiveness thresholds for projects funded through the REMOVE II and
Heavy-duty Incentive Programs. However, there is currently no minimum cost-effectiveness
established for the CMAQ program, and according to recent studies, the numbers vary widely
across the country and by project type.
Prior to allocation of CMAQ funds for the local cost-effectiveness policy with each FTIP, the SJV
MPOs in consultation with the interagency consultation (IAC) partners will develop the minimum
cost-effectiveness threshold. While other criteria may be developed at the discretion of Kern
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-24
Kern Council of Governments
Council of Governments, all projects funded by the 20% of CMAQ dollars related to the local cost-
effectiveness CMAQ policy must meet that minimum threshold.
Expenditure of Funds under the Local Cost-Effectiveness Policy
Kern COG will make every effort to expend the minimum 20% funding for the cost-effective
projects as soon as possible beginning in FY 2011. However, recognizing that there are additional
issues related to project delivery and financial constraint, Kern COG will be allowed to meet the
20% funding over the course of the FTIP, beginning with the 2008 FTIP and each new FTIP
thereafter. For example, if the four-year estimate is $4 million in one year, or other combination
of funding.
Project eligibility will continue to be based on federal CMAQ guidance. MPOs can continue to
fund projects within the local jurisdictions, or contribute funding to the SJVAPCD air quality grant
incentive programs to meet their cost-effectiveness threshold requirements.
Emissions Estimates
CMAQ projects must demonstrate an air quality benefit, and the expected emissions reductions
will continue to be estimated with the most recent methodology. As of 2007, the ARB “Methods
to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects” released in 2005 is the appropriate
methodology. If necessary, interagency consultation will be used to reach agreement on the
methodology for future estimates. Emission benefits and cost-effectiveness calculations will
continue to be based on the applicable pollutants for the region, including nitrogen oxides (NOx),
volatile organic compounds (VOC), particulate matter (PM) and carbon monoxide (CO).
Reporting Requirements
Tracking of the CMAQ policy will be achieved through several methods. MPOs must develop
annual reports for Caltrans and FHWA that specify how CMAQ funds have been spent and the
expected air quality benefits. This report is due by the first day of February following the end of
the previous Federal fiscal year (September 30) and covers all CMAQ obligations for that fiscal
year. As has been the practice of several MPOs, a copy of the CMAQ annual report will also be
submitted to the Air District for information purposes. Each MPO will also post information
related to the implementation of the local cost-effectiveness CMAQ policy on its website.
Policy Review
Due to changes in project costs and technology over time, the MPOs will revisit the minimum
cost-effectiveness threshold, as well as policy feasibility, at least once every four years prior to
FTIP development. A periodic review of the policy is necessary due to potential changes in federal
transportation legislation, apportionments, and project eligibility. This policy will only affect 20%
of the allocated federal CMAQ funds, and does not imply changes to other funding programs.
Chapter 5: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ)
PROJECT DELIVERY POLICIES & PROCEDURES 5-25
Kern Council of Governments
Should future transportation legislation not include CMAQ funding, this policy will no longer be
in effect.
Example Schedule
The following is an example schedule of the policy implementation and updates. This information
is only representative of the general approach and specific schedules will be developed in the
future (annual reports will continue to be prepared and submitted as required).
Example Schedule
Summer 2008
Develop cost-effectiveness threshold through interagency
consultation
Fall 2008
Identify funding available in the 2008 FTIP related to the
20% local cost-effectiveness policy
Spring 2009
Implement call for projects – Quantify, rank, and select
CMAQ projects
Summer 2009
Approve Amendment to 2008 FTIP
Summer 2011
Review policy feasibility. If policy is continued, proceed
with following steps. Update cost-effectiveness threshold
through interagency consultation
Fall 2011
Identify funding available in the 2012 FTIP related to the
20% local cost-effectiveness policy
Spring 2012
Implement call for projects – Quantify, rank, and select
CMAQ projects
Summer 2012
Approve 2012 FTIP
Resolution of Local Support
Resolution No.
Authorizing the filing of an application for (INSERT FUNDING PROGRAM NAME HERE) funding and
committing the necessary local match and stating the assurance to complete the project
The (INSERT APPLICANT NAME HERE) (herein referred to as APPLICANT) is submitting an
application to the Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) for (INSERT FUNDING $ AMOUNT
HERE) in funding from the (INSERT FUNDING PROGRAM NAME HERE) program for the (INSERT
PROJECT TITLE(S) HERE) (herein referred to as PROJECT); and
APPLICANT has the financial capacity to complete, operate and maintain the project;
and
APPLICANT will ensure that funds required from other sources will be reasonably
expected to be available on the time frame needed to carry out the project; and
APPLICANT is authorized to execute and file an application for funding the PROJECT
under the (INSERT FUNDING PROGRAM NAME HERE) Program; and
APPLICANT, by adopting this resolution, does hereby state that:
1. APPLICANT will provide ($ minimum match amount) in local matching funds; and
2. APPLICANT understands that the (INSERT FUNDING PROGRAM NAME HERE) funding
for the project is fixed at the approved programmed amount, and that any cost
increases must be funded by the APPLICANT from other funds, and that APPLICANT
does not expect any cost increases to be funded
with additional (INSERT FUNDING
PROGRAM NAME HERE) funding; and
3. APPLICANT understands the funding deadlines associated with these funds and will
comply with the program implementation procedures described in Chapter 2 of the
Kern COG Project Delivery Policies and Procedures manual; and
4. PROJECT will be implemented as described in the complete application and in this
resolution and, if approved, for the amount programmed in the FTIP; and
5. APPLICANT and the PROJECT will comply with the requirements as set forth in the
program; and
APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director, General Manager, or designee to execute
and file an application with Kern COG for (INSERT FUNDING PROGRAM NAME HERE) funding for
the PROJECT as referenced in this resolution.
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

March 23, 2021 TO: Member Agencies and Interested (Kern Council of Governments)

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 28 April 2021

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document