NTE-10
SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
SUMMARY PERFORMANCE RATING FOR NON-TEACHING FACULTY
Name ________________________________________ Position ____________________
Academic Rank _________________________________ No. Yrs. in Current Rank ______
CRITERIA
The criteria to be used in evaluation shall include but not be limited to the following:
1. Effectiveness in the performance of the tasks delineated in the appropriate
position description.
2. Effectiveness in establishing and maintaining positive professional relationships with
colleagues, supervisors, students, and the community.
3. Effectiveness in maintaining a current competence in the particular discipline or field of
specialization.
4. Adherence to policies, procedures, and regulations of the college and the
Virginia Community College System.
5. Effectiveness and implementation of MBO’s.
Performance evaluations shall include a summary rating of UNSATISFACTORY, FAIR, GOOD, VERY
GOOD, OR EXCELLENT, as defined below:
UNSATISFACTORY - fails to meet performance standards.
FAIR - marginally meets performance standards
GOOD - performs satisfactorily, meeting performance standards
VERY GOOD - clearly exceeds performance standards
EXCELLENT - consistently delivers outstanding performance,
substantially exceeding performance standards
Based on criteria, categories, and definitions for evaluation, the above faculty member received an overall rating
of __________________ for _______________.
(year)
1. The person evaluated received a completed copy of this form.
Yes ______ No ______
2. The person evaluated prepared his/her own reaction to the rating. (attach copy).
Yes ______ No ______
Rating prepared by: ________________________________________ _________________
Supervisor Date
Faculty Member Signature ___________________________________ _________________
Date
(YOUR SIGNATURE DOES NOT INDICATE THAT YOU AGREE WITH THE EVALUATION)
Signature _________________________________________________ _________________
Division Dean/Director Date
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
APPROVED
_____________________________________ ________________________________
Vice President Date President Date
COMMENTS
3-65
9/03
NTE-2
SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
NON-TEACHING FACULTY EFFECTIVENESS APPRAISAL
Name of Non-Teaching Faculty Member __________________________________________
Position ____________________________________________________________________
(Please keep the individual’s position description in mind when completing this rating form.)
Directions: Write the number in the blank space that describes your judgment of that factor. Rate the faculty member on
each item that is appropriate. You may want to review the criteria, categories, and definitions for evaluation on the other
side of this form before completing this appraisal.
EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD FAIR UNSATISFACTORY DON’T KNOW
5 4 3 2 1 X
_____ 1. Communicates with you in a timely and responsive manner.
_____ 2. Applies policy consistently and fairly.
_____ 3. Judges people perceptively and fairly.
_____ 4. Makes sound and timely decisions.
_____ 5. Listens openly and attentively to others who present their ideas, even when he/she disagrees.
_____ 6. Gives proper and generous credit to others for their contributions.
_____ 7. Is sensitive to the need for confidentiality.
_____ 8. Willing to appraise situations and problems impartially.
_____ 9. Fosters trust and openness by showing understanding for the point of view of individuals who
come to him/her with problems or concerns.
_____ 10. Earns the respect and trust of co-workers and subordinates.
_____ 11. Communicates written or verbal instructions clearly.
_____ 12. Gathers pertinent facts before acting.
_____ 13. Has a sense of quality and standards.
_____ 14. Motivates and energizes others to do a better job.
_____ 15. Consults with others on important decisions.
_____ 16. Keeps abreast of changes in his/her area of responsibility
_____ 17 Encourages others to generate new ideas and methods for improved work procedures and/or
job performance.
_____ 18. Facilitates effective information sharing and problem solving in the department/division.
_____ 19. Places student issues as institutional priorities.
_____ 20. Gives others assignments and responsibilities that provide opportunities for their personal
growth and development.
_____ Composite rating
3-64
8/01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00