Building and Safety Division
1 Town Square ~ Murrieta, CA 92562
Phone: 951-461-6062 Fax: 951-698-4509
APPLICATION FOR ALTERNATE MATERIALS, DESIGN AND METHODS
Please complete the following when requesting approval of a product or material based on its equivalency as an
alternate material, design or method of construction in accordance with CBC 1.8.7
Project Name:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project Location:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Applicant:_______________________________________________
Company:_______________________________________________
Address:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
City:_______________________________________________________
State:____________
Zip Code:__________________________
Phone:____________________________________________________
Email:___________________________________________________
Proposed material/product, design or method:
Reason for this request:
ALL REQUESTS MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
Copy of the material or product
Copy of the material or product test report
Copy of the standard for the product for which you believe the proposed product is equivalent
Provide an analysis of the equivalency
Copy of a third party verification and/or listing
SEE THE ATTACHED “GUIDELINES” FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
Guidelines for Approval of Alternate Materials, Design and Methods of Construction
Basis for Approval
For the Director of Building Safety (Director) or their designated agent to approve a request for
modification or a request for alternate material or method of construction, they must determine that
special individual reasons exists that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical and
that equivalency is provided. The resulting condition must be in conformance with the spirit and purpose
of the Code provisions involved and that such modification does not lessen application to allow the above
evaluation to be made.
Requirements for Submittals
The applicant design professional shall prepare a written report that describes the alternate proposal
along with the applicable data listed below:
State specific code provisions for which alternative is requested and why request is being
submitted
Describe, by code section, those provisions for which alternative is desired
Compare the proposed alternative versus the code requirements in terms of structural strength,
suitability, effectiveness, fire resistance, safety and health impacts affecting the building or user of
the building
Demonstrate the proposed alternative is compatible with the balance of code requirements
When applicable, specify how authoritative consensus document(s) are used to substantiate
proposal
Provide assumptions, references, and documentation of evaluation methods utilized. This includes
intended use, input data, anticipated outputs, and limitations of computer models and other
analytical tools or methods
Specify when and where special inspection and testing are required and the standards of
acceptance for demonstrating compliance. Show how the proposed alternate, if accepted, will be
identified on the job site
Where land use restrictions and building setbacks are required, deed restrictions may be an
appropriate method to ensure continued compliance
State how and where alternate proposal is incorporated within construction plans and prepare
plan amendments as necessary. The design professional has the responsibility to coordinate all
construction documents and ensure compatibility between documents
The report and design documents shall be dated, signed and stamped by the design professional
according to plan submittal procedures
For alternate methods of design requests, the applicant shall set performance criteria for their
design. Performance criteria shall be reviewed, amended and approved by the Director prior to
start of design
Alternative Design Review/Verification
The Director has the responsibility to review design submittals for compliance to the adopted codes and
procedures. If the Director does not have the expertise on staff to make a thorough and competent
review, the Director shall select a consultant that possesses the necessary qualifications to perform a
third-party or peer-review. Cost of peer review shall be paid by applicant to the Building and Safety
Department prior to commencing the review.
Verify all applicable information and justifications listed above as requirements for submittals is
received and verify evaluation design methods used by designer are appropriate to the alternative
proposed
Verify products are being used in accordance with their listing conditions. If not available, require
documentation and/or testing to demonstrate compliance with intent of code and intended use
Evaluate performance of material and possible flaws that could affect performance of material in
its installed state
The reviewer shall document the submittal has been reviewed and accepted as meeting the
alternative materials, design and methods of construction provisions of the code. If the Director is
not satisfied the applicant has met the conditions, the request should be denied in writing with the
applicable reason(s)
Inspection/Field Verification
The alternate proposal as approved in the construction documents must be verified by inspections, and
where necessary, testing as follows:
To verify alternated materials, systems and fabricated products comply with accepted design
criteria and the manufacturers and engineers installation procedures, inspectors shall check
product labeling, certification, quality assurance processes, and testing as applicable
When appropriate, an approved third party quality assurance inspection and testing service may
be required for continuous inspection and testing activities. This is intended to verify that
construction complies with the code and the approved plans