Fill - Free fillable IF Remote Learning Full Fillable PDF form

Since March of 2020, teaching and learning has undergone unprecedented changes here and across the country. As we

navigate the continuing adjustments in education, we are presented with an opportunity to work together to provide students

with a high-quality education in a new learning environment.

With that in mind, this companion was created to assist educators, school leaders, and those who support and coach

instructional sta during remote teaching and learning and is designed to be used alongside the City Schools Instructional

Framework Rubric. The content is intended to give examples of possible teacher and student actions that support eective

instruction in the TEACH Indicators of the rubric. These suggestions are based upon feedback from City Schools teachers,

coaches, and district and school leaders, and are grounded in research from several accredited sources, including: the Danielson

Group, NSQ National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, the National Institute for Excellence in Teaching, ISTE, and state and

local system models from Maryland and Pennsylvania.

This is a companion to our City Schools Instructional Framework Rubric and is NOT meant to replace the indicators on the

Instructional Framework Rubric. Rather, it is intended to support teachers and school leaders in:

Preparing for remote teaching and learning, with examples of strategies or routines they may incorporate into their own

instruction

Observing remote teaching and learning informally and formally, with examples of how the pedagogical elements of

our rubric may present in a virtual learning environment

Facilitating ongoing discussion about remote teaching and learning, with the inclusion of research-based examples

and space for school teams to generate, elevate, and personalize strategies and routines that are in use and have been

successful with students they serve

Using this Companion at Your School

This document includes research-based examples that can help guide your school team’s discussions about the most eective

remote teaching and learning strategies for your school’s student population and instructional focus.

As you navigate the pages, you will see space for documenting examples for each TEACH indicator and guiding questions to help

facilitate your team discussions. These virtual examples can also be used to help drive discussion in pre- and post-observation

conferences and connect to the PREPARE and the REFLECT & ADJUST domains of the Instructional Framework Rubric.

INSTRUCTIONAL FRAMEWORK RUBRIC:

Remote Teaching and Learning Companion

Please keep in mind that it is important that the virtual tools used by teachers and students follow the

recommendations from City Schools Online Resource Hub and guidelines outlined in City Schools’ District Policies.

A Few Notes About Formal Observations During Remote Learning

When using this companion to our City Schools Instructional Framework Rubric for formal observations of remote teaching and

learning, teachers and observers should consider the following reminders.

Reminder: Continue to use the Instructional Framework Rubric when determining formal observation ratings

The descriptors and expectations within the Instructional Framework Rubric remain the same. After gathering their evidence

during the observation and aligning their evidence with the appropriate TEACH indicators, observers determine which level of

performance is supported by the preponderance of evidence.

The examples included in this document are ways in which these eective instructional practices may look during an

observation of virtual instruction – they do not replace the rubric expectations, but are examples of what aligned evidence

may look like. This resource does not include separate examples of developing or ineective practice; the existing

Instructional Framework Rubric language already provides description of the dierence in quality of performance on a

continuum.

Reminder: Continue to use pre-observation conferences to discuss the activity to be observed and the teacher’s

instructional strategies

For SY 2020-21, all formal observations continue to be announced formal observations with pre-observation conferences.

Teachers should be prepared to review their lesson with the observer and discuss their instructional strategies. Teachers and

observers can use the examples in this companion resource to focus their discussion during these conferences and to identify

potential areas/points in the lesson where this evidence might exist.

Reminder: Do not use the examples in this companion resource like a checklist, requiring every example to be

included in a teacher’s lesson

This companion document reﬂects research-based examples of how teaching and learning may look in a virtual learning

environment. It is not the expectation – nor is it appropriate – that every example or strategy be seen in a particular lesson.

Rather, these are examples intended to help teachers and school leaders prepare for, observe and discuss virtual instruction.

It is also not the intention of this resource for teachers or school leaders to stop or change the eective remote teaching and

learning strategies and routines which they have already put into practice. This is why space has been built into this resource

to allow school teams to reﬂect upon their virtual instruction and align their practices with the TEACH indicators of the rubric.

Reminder: Navigate the technical platform features to gather evidence during an observation

There are several ways in which observers can gather information in the virtual learning environment which the teacher has

organized. Observers should:

be co-hosts in the lesson they are observing,

be given access to review the lesson materials and how they are virtually organized and made accessible to learners,

monitor student responses in the chat or other tools,

join student break-out groups (if applicable),

and/or review student work that is posted or shared.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 1. Facilitate clear, standards-based content learning

When teaching, teachers must intentionally set a learning objective or goal that specifies the skills and content of the day while ensuring they are teaching with purpose and students understand this

purpose and its significance. In the facilitation of student learning, teachers should use curriculum-provided, aligned activities, appropriate and available technology, and academic language.

Students should have opportunities to demonstrate their own thinking about the facilitated content.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (4) WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE VIRTUALLY WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE IN OUR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE (3)

● With teacher support,

students make

connections across and

within disciplines to

support content

learning

● With teacher supports,

students connect their

learning to essential

questions, life

periences, or their

own identities

● Teacher virtually displays curriculum

aligned learning goals on presentations

and documents and introduces real-world

visuals and/or examples of its significance

to students.

● Teacher uses brief content appropriate

“hooks” (e.g. short video clips) to motivate

students of task purpose and goals with

appropriate stop points to check for

understanding or wonderings about the

learning.

● Teacher uses online tools to highlight and

emphasize key learning (e.g. document

camera, drawing tools in Microsoft or

Google, Read/Write Toolbar) and curates it

as a resource for use during the lesson or

for asynchronous learning as needed.

● Students participate in teacher created

breakout rooms in Zoom or utilize

synchronous tools (e.g. Google docs,

Jamboard) or work individually to show

evidence of learning that can be shared by

student or teacher to others in the class.

● Teacher uses virtual timer tools to support

appropriate pacing during individual and

group work; timing is adjusted based upon

student need when appropriate.

● Teacher presents a

purpose for learning

standards-based lesson

objective that is grade-

level or beyond, and the

significance of their

learning.

● Tasks have a clear

purpose that is aligned

with the lesson objectiv

nd standard an

ovide challenge

for

tudents.

● Teacher presents content

accurately and

emphasizes important

concepts accurately.

● Students demonstrate

heir new or higher-level

thinking

, individually or

in groups.

● Teacher uses pacing

ppropriate for

content and students’

needs.

Connections can be to any prior learning, readings, other contents and learning experiences. Students should be able to describe the connection to their current learning in their own words, and what has led them to make this connection.

Essential questions or life experiences for PK-2.

The purpose for learning is not the same as the tasks the students will complete. It should help name the construction for understanding or the concept that is the focus of the learning

Challenges may be cognitive, affective, or psychomotor. Cognitive challenge is described as higher-level thinking on Bloom’s taxonomy or increased depth on Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. The exploration of new materials may include cognitive

challenge and higher-level thinking. Affective challenge can be described as challenging students’ emotions or feelings. Psychomotor challenge is described as learning movements.

This can be done verbally, through writing, drawing, acting, performance, creating with materials, or other ways.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 1. Facilitate clear, standards-based content learning

THINK ABOUTS AND DISCUSSION POINTS FOR VIRTUAL LEARNING IN OUR SCHOOL

The “what this may look like virtually” examples for this TEACH indicator are research-based and serve as a starting point for what teaching and learning looks like in

the remote learning environment in your school. When considering how teaching and learning look in your school and/or classroom:

●

What are the appropriate tools and expectations for the students you serve (teacher-student communication, interaction with peers, organization of

resources, directions and modeling)?

●

What norms have you established with students pertaining to online etiquette and how are they modeled and reinforced?

●

What is the appropriate balance of student agency and teacher control for the students you serve?

●

How should teachers create collaborative spaces (length of time, set up, monitoring) based upon students’ needs?

Please, be mindful that the “food for thoughts” below are not an exhaustive list of how teacher and student behaviors aligned with the expectations of this TEACH

indicator can be observed. It is likely that a modified version of an example listed here is one which is a part of a teacher’s current routine, in response to the students

served. For example, when creating collaborative space for student engagement, teachers may create breakout pairs versus groups, shorten the length of time

students are in breakouts, or use collaborative tools for whole-group engagement, such as online whiteboards (Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi).

● How are teachers virtually communicating the learning objective and its significance throughout the lesson?

More food for thought: Teacher posts objectives the chat and/or reminds students verbally of the goals at key points during the lesson; teacher states learning goals

on all presentation materials and activities (e.g. Google slides and docs); teacher asks students to unmute or go on chat and remind the class of the objective in their

own words as a connection to the new learning; etc.

● What visuals or virtual strategies can support students in making connections to the new learning?

More food for thought: Teacher uses videos (e.g. Discovery, curricular, or teacher created ScreenCastify or recorded PowerPoint) that relate students to the

learning; teacher posts content related images or asks student to find and post images that students may comment on in the chat; teacher poses a question verbally

or onscreen that allows students to record and respond to peers (e.g. Flipgrid) or encourages students to unmute or turn on cameras (e.g. Zoom); students draw an

image of their understanding and show it on screen (e.g. Zoom); teacher incorporates tools to assist students in understanding language or with reading difficulties

(e.g. Read the Web, Mercury Reader, Microsoft Translate tools), etc.

● How can students show what they know individually or in groups?

More food for thought: Students share their device screen or paper item on camera to show their understanding; students post uploaded images, recordings, or

drawings (e.g. Seesaw, chat postings); teacher shares student work (with student permission) from a shared document (e.g. Google slides, Office 365 doc); students

use an interactive whiteboard to show process to peers in real-time (e.g. Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi); etc.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 2. Use strategies and tasks to engage students in rigorous work

While teaching, teachers use strategies in order to engage each student in rigorous work and learning that provides challenge. Teachers use curricular materials, evidence-based strategies,

and appropriate differentiation and scaffolding to provide access points for students at all levels. Through these strategies, students are empowered to take charge of their learning and

classwork.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (4) WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE VIRTUALLY WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE IN OUR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE (3)

● With teacher supports,

students determine and

select strategies

tha

support their learning

eeds and goals to enga

n the learning task.

● Teacher incorporates

student voice an

oice

into lesson,

while maintaining

access to grade-level

or beyond learning

● Teacher gives students purposeful time to

independently generate responses or

participate in group discussion (e.g.

breakout rooms, online collaboration tools)

and monitors the platform.

● Students show their processes in real-time

using teacher monitored platforms (e.g. Go

Guardian) or online whiteboard as teacher

provides feedback directly on student

work.

● Teacher provides student work that is

easily accessible and organized with clear

expectations; multiple resources for

different levels of learners are provided as

needed (e.g. Google Classroom).

● Students purposefully annotate documents

on online platforms (e.g. Google Docs or

Microsoft 365) with teacher modeling and

support.

● Teacher assigns or releases students to

breakout rooms, synchronous document

groups, or specific independent tasks

based upon real-time formative

assessment results (poll or visual quick

check for understanding e.g. thumbs up on

camera or response in chat).

● Students have time and

opportunities to engage in

and grapple

with complex

texts

and rigorous tasks.

● In response to teacher’s

guidance, students engage in

the lesson learning and use

strategies to persist in order

to meet the challenge.

● Teacher appropriately

rovides scaffolds

differentiates

in a manne

at supports each

student’s

access to grade-

level or beyond learning.

● Teacher uses or models

evidence- based strategies

to engage students with texts

and/or tasks.

● Teacher’s release of

responsibility to students i

responsive to how students

engage with complexity and

challenge.

15 Students can draw on strategies and resources to support them in accessing a challenging text or task. Examples include, but are not limited to, students using a resource text, class notes or manipulatives while working on an assignment.

16 Student voice and choice may include students selecting the essential question to focus their learning, selecting the format or final product to demonstrate their learning, or selecting the text(s) or materials for their learning

17 When students grapple with a text or task, they should go through a “productive struggle,” not a struggle so overwhelming that they are unable to work through it.

18 Texts are not limited to literary work. May include, but are not limited to, informal images, texts, images, graphs, artwork, musical pieces, modeled movements, and letters.

19 Appropriately refers to scaffolds and differentiations informed by IEP or ELL supports/plans or based on student data, information resulting from progress monitoring, and/or progress on formative and summative assessments.

20 Appropriate scaffolding does not mean teachers scaffold every task. Teachers scaffold only when the complexity of the task and/or students’ prior knowledge requires scaffolding. Effective scaffolding of learning tasks results in multiple pathways to

completion and/or determining the correct response.

21 Differentiation’s primary goal is ensuring rigorous content for all students. Although product, process, content or task may be altered to provide access to different students, the differentiated task should lead all students to produce work at the level of

rigor that the standard requires. Teachers can differentiate above the level of the standard.

22 “Each student” does not mean each individual student has a different scaffold or differentiation strategy, rather it means each student’s needs and strengths are accounted for as they are placed in an appropriate instructional group and receive work

tailored to the instructional group that meets his/her or receive scaffolds. Instructional groups can be determined based on various student data such as skill levels, current progress, interests and ability levels.

23 Strategies may include modeling, cooperative learning, using graphic organizers, teaching strategies with content, or helping students engage in metacognition.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 2. Use strategies and tasks to engage students in rigorous work

THINK ABOUTS AND DISCUSSION POINTS FOR VIRTUAL LEARNING IN OUR SCHOOL

The “what this may look like virtually” examples for this TEACH indicator are research-based and serve as a starting point for what teaching and learning looks like in

the remote learning environment in your school. When considering how teaching and learning look in your school and/or classroom:

●

What are the appropriate tools and expectations for the students you serve (teacher-student communication, interaction with peers, organization of

resources, directions and modeling)?

●

What norms have you established with students pertaining to online etiquette and how are they modeled and reinforced?

●

What is the appropriate balance of student agency and teacher control for the students you serve?

●

How should teachers create collaborative spaces (length of time, set up, monitoring) based upon students’ needs?

Please, be mindful that the “food for thoughts” below are not an exhaustive list of how teacher and student behaviors aligned with the expectations of this TEACH

indicator can be observed. It is likely that a modified version of an example listed here is one which is a part of a teacher’s current routine, in response to the students

served. For example, when creating collaborative space for student engagement, teachers may create breakout pairs versus groups, shorten the length of time

students are in breakouts, or use collaborative tools for whole-group engagement, such as online whiteboards (Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi).

● How can teachers create different opportunities virtually for students to grapple with information?

More food for thought: Teacher creates student assigned individual or collaborative virtual spaces (e.g. Google docs, Seesaw) and sets online timers for student

on-task engagement (timers can be reset responsively to student need, possibly teacher provides further questioning for student extension of thinking); teacher

performs “temperature checks” that can occur as students work on “paper” assignments asking them to put numbers in the chat or hold up fingers on camera as to

their level of understanding or completion; students bring pre-class work/asynchronous materials to “flip” the learning so that synchronous work is spent applying

rather than gathering knowledge (Google classroom for posting asynchronous work); students submit their thinking orally (unmute) and/or in chat (Zoom); etc.

● How can teachers create scaffolding or differentiation of content that is easy for students to access and navigate?

More food for thought: Teacher creates organized files and directly assigns them to be easily accessible to students (e.g. Google Classroom); teacher differentiates

materials and assigns or directs students to specific digital folders or documents through private chat links; teacher creates hyperdocs (e.g. Google docs) that allow

students to select areas for review and practice; teacher differentiates tasks and verbally assigns tasks for each student to complete on their papers at home in

response to student understanding or progression; students are allowed to complete tasks at different levels and time frames with some students remaining in

breakout rooms while others return to the main room to engage in teacher facilitated feedback (e.g. Zoom); etc.

● How can student responsibility be increased by their voice and choice be incorporated into a virtual lesson?

More food for thought: With student permission, teacher shares student work examples when responding to questions or as exemplars or has students present on

camera or on their screen; teacher creates opportunity for students to share their personal connections to new learning in the chat, with pictures, or recording in an

online platform (e.g. Flipgrid); teacher shows several images onscreen and allows early learners to write the letters on paper representing the sounds they use in

their favorite one, then show their letters to the class on camera or unmute to tell their response to peers; teacher creates online choice boards (e.g. Google docs)

that allow students to select areas of interest to complete tasks; students choose text or task for learning activity by choosing one of several folders of resources

teacher has made available (e.g. Google Classroom); etc.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 3. Use intentional questioning to deepen learning

When teaching, teachers use questions to deepen learning and push student thinking. Through intentionally planned and scaffolded questions, students increase their levels of thinking and

justify responses by regularly using evidence. Questions should occur at key points, be aligned to the learning goal, and provide opportunity for multiple students to respond.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (4) WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE VIRTUALLY WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE IN OUR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE (3)

● Students lead questioning

throughout the class.

● Students hold one

another (and themselves)

accountable for justifying

their answers by using

evidence and/o

aborating on their

thought processes, when

needed.

● Students reflect on the

variety of pathways

they and/or their peers

used in order to

appropriately respond

to questions.

● Teacher inserts meaningful key questions

at points throughout the lesson and solicits

student responses in the chat, on camera,

or in a discussion posting.

● Students appropriately display their work

on screen, on camera, in chat, or verbally

as they explain processes and field

questions from classmates.

● Teacher plans questions to prompt thinking

and/or quickly gauge student

understanding using online surveys, polls,

or visual cues (holding up fingers for level

of understanding, typing in the chat, Zoom

polls).

● Teacher creates Zoom breakout rooms or

shared digital spaces (e.g. Jamboard)

based upon student responses to share

different answers or ways students got

their answers.

● Students are responsive to teacher and/or

student questions and prompts through

chat bar, emoticons, or on-camera visuals

and/or unmuted verbal statements; teacher

addresses with responsive feedback.

● Teacher consistently

poses varied questions

hat engage multipl

tudents

in the lesson

learning.

● Teacher ensures students

justify their thinking by

explaining their thought

process and/or usin

evidence

● Teacher asks questions that

are clear

and lesson-

appropriate

at key points

hroughout the lesson that

are followed by sufficient

wait time

● When needed, teacher

supports students in

exploring a variety of

appropriate

responses and

pathways for arriving at

appropriate responses.

● Teacher values

input from

all students and ensures

students have opportunities

contribute equitably.

25 Because students may be learning the skill of peer feedback, the timing of the observation informs student progress towards the goal. Additionally, for early elementary students, teacher prompting and explicit teaching is appropriate.

26 Consistency can be described as the majority of teacher questions spread throughout the class period.

27 Teacher uses closed-ended/convergent, open-ended/divergent, lower-level, and higher-level questions based on the type of learning needed at the moment. Different types, levels, and purposes of questions engage student curiosity and learning.

28 Engaging multiple students can consider the variety of students who are encouraged to respond, variety of students who do respond, and the variety of students for whom the questions are accessible.

29 Students using evidence can be verbal or non-verbal. This includes citing text, giving examples from lesson activities, or gesturing to text or images.

30 Clear questions do not require clarification or restating in order for students to answer.

31 Appropriate refers to the questions’ relevance to the lesson learning or task as well as being developmentally appropriate for students who are responding.

32 Key points are pivotal moments when questioning can highlight prioritized content, concepts and/or student understanding. Questioning at key points also supports the forward movement of the lesson.

33 Wait time allows time for multiple students to formulate a response. This does not always mean silence in the classroom. Examples include, but are not limited to, using strategies such as stop-and-jot, think-pair-share, or turn-and-talk to help students

process questions.

34 Depending on the lesson and requirements of the purpose for learning, appropriate responses are not necessarily correct, but support continued learning.

35 Value can be demonstrated through the teacher’s speech, tone, body language, and practices to include all student voices during instruction

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 3. Use intentional questioning to deepen learning

THINK ABOUTS AND DISCUSSION POINTS FOR VIRTUAL LEARNING IN OUR SCHOOL

The “what this may look like virtually” examples for this TEACH indicator are research-based and serve as a starting point for what teaching and learning looks like in

the remote learning environment in your school. When considering how teaching and learning look in your school and/or classroom:

●

What are the appropriate tools and expectations for the students you serve (teacher-student communication, interaction with peers, organization of

resources, directions and modeling)?

●

What norms have you established with students pertaining to online etiquette and how are they modeled and reinforced?

●

What is the appropriate balance of student agency and teacher control for the students you serve?

●

How should teachers create collaborative spaces (length of time, set up, monitoring) based upon students’ needs?

Please, be mindful that the “food for thoughts” below are not an exhaustive list of how teacher and student behaviors aligned with the expectations of this TEACH

indicator can be observed. It is likely that a modified version of an example listed here is one which is a part of a teacher’s current routine, in response to the students

served. For example, when creating collaborative space for student engagement, teachers may create breakout pairs versus groups, shorten the length of time

students are in breakouts, or use collaborative tools for whole-group engagement, such as online whiteboards (Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi).

● How can teachers pose thoughtful questions that allow for multiple student responses and student interaction?

More food for thought: Students use teacher-created discussion boards to type or record responses (e.g. Flipgrid, pre-created Google docs) or use the chat to

encourage higher-level thinking; teacher poses questions that allow students to create personal connections to learning and describe that connection through a visual

on camera or posted for other students to view and comment on (e.g. Google Slides, Seesaw); teachers poses an open-ended question and allows students answers to

create a collage to see how their thoughts relate to that of their classmates (AnswerGarden.ch); teacher uses name wheel to assure that all students have an

opportunity to speak during the class (Google Classroom Random Name Picker); etc.

● How can teachers model and ensure that students show evidence of understanding in responses?

More food for thought: Teacher shows onscreen exemplars of evidence based responses from student work (with student permission) or creates exemplars that are

easily accessible for students to revisit (e.g. Google Classroom, Seesaw, teacher creates quick check online quizzes that requires students to respond with steps and

work shown (ex: Nearpod, Jamboard); students are asked to create a brief video of themselves explaining or showing their steps or evidence and post for teacher

and/or peer feedback (e.g. Flipgrid, using a ScreenCastify to record and post to Google Classroom in Collaborative space); teacher plans and records a variety of key

question types on slides and presents them at opportune times for student reflection (e.g. Google Slides); teacher creates digital language/sentence frames for

students to participate in breakout discussions (e.g. Google Docs) etc.

● How can students take the lead in or extend questioning?

More food for thought: Teacher asks students to write a question down or put type it in an online form that they have about the objective at the beginning of class and

then the questions are revisited at the end of class with students to see if students are able to answer their original questions (e.g. Google forms); students view peer

work and post a question they have about their product or process (e.g. Nearpod, Seesaw), teacher shows a book cover on screen and asks students to share a

question or wonder they have about the story based on the cover (Zoom mic, camera, or chat); etc.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 4. Monitor progress and provide feedback

During a lesson, teachers monitor progress of student learning through formative assessments and address student misunderstandings. Teachers use that information to guide their moves

to facilitate student learning and understanding during the current lesson and future lessons. Artifacts should indicate student learning towards the lesson objective or goal.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (4)

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE VIRTUALLY

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE IN OUR SCHOOL

EFFECTIVE (3)

● In response to evidence

from formative

assessments, teacher

facilitates peer learning

opportunities that

advance learning.

● Students correct,

clarify, expand, or redo

work in response to

feedback from teacher

or other students

● Students use quick quizzes, chat boxes,

polls, non-verbal cues (e.g. reaction

buttons or on camera), or verbal feedback

intermittently at key points throughout the

lesson to prove understanding.

● Teacher creates heterogeneous or

homogeneous breakout rooms or shared

virtual spaces (e.g. Google Slides, Seesaw,

Go Guardian) to support student learning

based upon real-time progress.

● Students submit drafts of work on chats or

online communication platforms (or on mic

or camera) where teacher and/or peers

can give feedback within the synchronous

space.

● Students submit artifacts through teacher

recommended, student accessible media

that allow the teacher to give timely,

actionable feedback based upon

standards aligned rubrics (e.g. Google

Classroom, Go Guardian, Google docs,

Seesaw).

● Teacher conducts

formative assessments

that yield useful

information for student

groups’ learning progress

at key points

throughout

the lesson.

● Teacher decisions and/or

adjustments are based on

student progress

information and

contribute to student

understanding of the

content.

● In response to student

misunderstandings,

teacher or other students

provide specific academic

feedback

that is

actionable and clarifies

next steps for students.

● Student artifacts

indicate application of

learning, mastery, or

progress towards

objective or learning

goal.

38 Formative assessments may include–but are not limited to–checks for understanding, exit tickets, white board activities or student responses to teacher questions. Formative assessments are not necessarily formal or written.

39 At key points means at pivotal moments in the lesson and provide an accurate pulse of the class to determine whether or not a teacher can move forward in the lesson. Data can come from previous day’s formative assessments as well.

40 Specific academic feedback is feedback that supports a student in understanding a concept, process or skill, and allows students to identify how they can take action to modify their work or maintain quality. Academic feedback can be tailored to address

the needs of the whole class, small groups, or individual students. Feedback should be based on whole or small group trends, and/or individual needs.

41 Artifacts can be from the same day or across related lessons.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 4. Monitor progress and provide feedback

THINK ABOUTS AND DISCUSSION POINTS FOR VIRTUAL LEARNING IN OUR SCHOOL

The “what this may look like virtually” examples for this TEACH indicator are research-based and serve as a starting point for what teaching and learning looks like in

the remote learning environment in your school. When considering how teaching and learning look in your school and/or classroom:

●

What are the appropriate tools and expectations for the students you serve (teacher-student communication, interaction with peers, organization of

resources, directions and modeling)?

●

What norms have you established with students pertaining to online etiquette and how are they modeled and reinforced?

●

What is the appropriate balance of student agency and teacher control for the students you serve?

●

How should teachers create collaborative spaces (length of time, set up, monitoring) based upon students’ needs?

Please, be mindful that the “food for thoughts” below are not an exhaustive list of how teacher and student behaviors aligned with the expectations of this TEACH

indicator can be observed. It is likely that a modified version of an example listed here is one which is a part of a teacher’s current routine, in response to the students

served. For example, when creating collaborative space for student engagement, teachers may create breakout pairs versus groups, shorten the length of time

students are in breakouts, or use collaborative tools for whole-group engagement, such as online whiteboards (Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi).

● How can teachers assess that students are following and understanding the content presented and can perform tasks successfully?

More food for thought: Teachers use frequent checks for understanding by asking students to translate learning in their own words (Zoom mic or camera or chat);

students write/draw on the online whiteboard simultaneously for a quick check for understanding (e.g. Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi); teacher poll or survey students at key

points and adjust teaching responsively (Zoom, Google Form); teacher creates frequent pauses in learning for quick assessment and for students to reflect on learning

(e.g. Pear Deck); students respond to exit ticket questions aligned with lesson purpose; etc.

● How and where will students share their work with the teacher and peers for feedback?

More food for thought: Students share their thinking within breakout rooms and discuss next steps or modifications with peers groups or partners; students record

themselves describing their ideas and peers record comments and ideas (e.g. Flipgrid); teacher creates a collaboration space for students to post work where peers

can pose questions (e.g. Google Classroom, Google docs); students turn on their camera or mics and read/explain/demonstrate their work while peers give feedback

in the chat; teacher creates a sign-up form shared with students through a chat link and posted on class home page to schedule time for check-ins during

asynchronous work (e.g. Google Forms, Google Classroom); written peer feedback provided during asynchronous instruction is reviewed, clarified, and/or responded

to in student pairs or groups, etc.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 5. Facilitate student interactions and academic talk

Teachers facilitate student interactions that engage students and support their progress towards the learning goal. Interactions should vary in format to include writing and/or speaking

opportunities within the full class, smaller groups and/or partners. Student interactions should be flexible, purposeful and consider student data. During student interactions, attention is paid

to ensuring each student is engaged and using content and academic vocabulary.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (4)

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE VIRTUALLY

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE IN OUR SCHOOL

EFFECTIVE (3)

● Students use academic

language and vocabulary

as they lead academic

discussions or group work

with minimal teacher

support.

● Students monitor their

progress in group wor

nd support one anothe

n staying productive an

on t

ask.

● Students demonstrate

ability to reflect on or

adapt their interactions

with other students

based on their ow

owing or developin

social- emotional

competencies.

● Students engage on different teacher

monitored platforms dependent upon the

task that increase student interaction such

as discussion boards, online whiteboards,

chat, collaborative documents, or breakout

rooms.

● Students utilize a teacher monitored virtual

anchor chart or word wall (e.g. linked in

Google Classroom) as a resource and add

to the postings with questions or new

insights.

● Teacher posts and reviews guiding

questions and/or explicit instructions to

support students prior to breakout groups

and monitors progress by moving in and

out of shared spaces.

● Students create successful work products

using goals, structures (e.g. breakout

groups, shared online form), assigned

roles, and timings per teacher directive

and monitoring.

● Students select (or teacher creates) teacher

monitored breakout sessions and/or

discussion post groups and/or

collaborative documents responsively

based upon formative assessment and

student need.

● Teacher provides multiple

opportunities for student

nteractions that serv

iverse purposes

● Teacher consistently

models and uses

strategies

to reinforce

student use of academic

vocabulary and language.

● In most student

nteractions, students

engage with their peers to

make meaning of content

or deepen their

understanding

of grade-

level or beyond content.

● Students work

collaboratively towards

learning goals by usin

tructures and supports

the teacher has put in

place.

● Teacher ensures

that

tudent interactions are

flexible, based on student

data

43 Academic talk supports student progress towards the learning goal. When students engage in academic talk, they use content and academic vocabulary. Appropriately supporting students should include consideration of student age and grade

level and sensitivity to cultural, linguistic and individual learning needs. Consideration must be used when students are non-verbal.

44 For pre-kindergarten and kindergarten classrooms, it may not be developmentally appropriate for students to lead academic discussions. Instead, student-led academic discussions will be heavily teacher facilitated, with significant scaffolding and

teacher modeling. Additionally, in some cases in ESOL classes, consideration should be given to what stage of language learning the students are in to determine effectiveness in student interactions.

45 Purposes may include to collaborate, brainstorm, process/internalize new information, check for understanding, repeat/reinforce information, critique/give feedback, model, or create a finished product.

46 These may include, but are not limited to, up to date word walls, visual reminders/cues, sentence starters. Differentiated strategies to support students whose home language is not English may be needed based on the students’ stage of language

learning, including processing time, sentence starters or visual cues in English and their home language, or strategic student pairings or groupings.

47 This could be adding to another student’s response, disagreeing respectfully and offering an alternative perspective, or asking questions of each other to push their thinking.

48 This can be demonstrated through the lesson plan, discussion, as well as sharing the data used to determine appropriateness of student interactions that are grounded in full class engagement, smaller groups, and/or partners and how often they

change.

49 Student data includes performance data, interests, and other data about the student.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 5. Facilitate student interactions and academic talk

THINK ABOUTS AND DISCUSSION POINTS FOR VIRTUAL LEARNING IN OUR SCHOOL

The “what this may look like virtually” examples for this TEACH indicator are research-based and serve as a starting point for what teaching and learning looks like in

the remote learning environment in your school. When considering how teaching and learning look in your school and/or classroom:

●

What are the appropriate tools and expectations for the students you serve (teacher-student communication, interaction with peers, organization of

resources, directions and modeling)?

●

What norms have you established with students pertaining to online etiquette and how are they modeled and reinforced?

●

What is the appropriate balance of student agency and teacher control for the students you serve?

●

How should teachers create collaborative spaces (length of time, set up, monitoring) based upon students’ needs?

Please, be mindful that the “food for thoughts” below are not an exhaustive list of how teacher and student behaviors aligned with the expectations of this TEACH

indicator can be observed. It is likely that a modified version of an example listed here is one which is a part of a teacher’s current routine, in response to the students

served. For example, when creating collaborative space for student engagement, teachers may create breakout pairs versus groups, shorten the length of time

students are in breakouts, or use collaborative tools for whole-group engagement, such as online whiteboards (Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi).

● How can teachers help to ensure diversity in student interactions?

More food for thought: Teacher creates an online station rotation in groups (with online texts and materials) that allow students to work together for varied purposes

such as brainstorming, collecting evidence, working through a process, peer feedback, etc. (e.g. Zoom breakout rooms, Google Classroom); teacher assigns

groups/pairs purposefully based upon student data, interests, needs, etc. and changes them based upon the task (heterogeneous or homogeneous, length of task)

(Nearpod, Google docs, breakouts); etc.

● How can teachers support on-task, positive interactions among students?

More food for thought: Teacher posts and reminds students of norms for appropriate behavior in student interactions/breakouts/feedback as a the opening slide as

students enter virtual class time (Google slide); teachers surveys students at end of activity to reflect on how they met lesson goals and/or class norms for group work

(Google form, poll); teacher provides frequent stopping points during activities to do whole class checks (chat, poll, on camera or mic cue); teacher keeps breakouts

short as students master agency and monitors groups frequently; students use collaborative documents per teacher instruction and monitoring (e.g. Google docs,

Jamboard) and students share their screens with peers; teacher joins breakout groups to monitor and offer feedback to students (e.g. Zoom); students are given

specific roles for group work to maintain focus on learning goals for the task; etc.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 6. Organize and implement routines to support a learning-focused classroom

Teachers create a classroom culture of high expectations, student ownership, and academic risk-taking. During the lesson, routines are used to focus students on learning. Routines should

help to maximize instructional time, ensure smooth transitions, increase student understanding of responsibilities, and provide a safe environment for students to take academic risks.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (4)

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE VIRTUALLY

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE IN OUR SCHOOL

EFFECTIVE (3)

● Teacher creates

conditions

where

students are expected to

take chances in th

earning task.

● Students handle breaks

in structure by

maintaining their

academic focus.

● Teacher and students

have created and

follow shared

agreements that

support the learning-

focused classroom.

● Students are participating by using the mic,

the chat, hand raising icon, adding to

discussion boards, or using on camera

cues during teacher instruction.

● Teacher posts class norms on screen as

students enter the class Zoom (and as a

reminder as appropriate) and addresses

students during synchronous learning to

reinforce participation and engagement

(e.g. for sharing work on screen, answering

polls, using the chat).

● Students can navigate the necessary lesson

virtual tools appropriately, transition in and

out of breakout groups, etc. (teacher

modeling and instruction is provided for

new platforms or options are provided for

technical issues).

● Online content is organized with clear

labels for students use; teacher creates an

online space where work is posted/shared

(e.g. Seesaw, Google Classroom).

● Students use online Zoom tools (cameras,

microphones, chat) appropriately per

classroom norms and/or teacher directive.

● Students are on task and

gaged in learning

throughout the lesson.

● Teacher holds all students

o appropriately high

expectations

in a

supportive manner

● Teacher has appropriate

utines

in place that

students execute

uccessfully.

● Teacher’s arrangement of

space and materials

facilitates student

movement, interactions,

and learning, and includes

celebration of studen

periences and current

work.

● Students manage

materials in

evelopmentally

appropriate manner.

50 In cases where teacher uses someone else’s classroom, observation should focus on how the teacher uses shared space and cart.

51 Conditions include: space and time to take chances, an encouraging environment, acceptance of help and encouragement from peers, a joy for learning.

52 Expectations may be academic, behavioral, or social.

53 Expectations should communicate care, interest, and belief in each student’s potential and can be observed through what and how teacher communicates and the

action(s) the teacher takes when reinforcing expectations that were not met or acknowledging when they were met. Evidence may come from teacher’s tone, posture,

body language, or word choice.

54 Appropriate routines reflect students’ developmental needs, are respectful to students, and reflect that students are assets within their classroom community.

55 Students demonstrate they generally know their responsibilities and know what to do next.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 6. Organize and implement routines to support a learning-focused classroom

THINK ABOUTS AND DISCUSSION POINTS FOR VIRTUAL LEARNING IN OUR SCHOOL

The “what this may look like virtually” examples for this TEACH indicator are research-based and serve as a starting point for what teaching and learning looks like in

the remote learning environment in your school. When considering how teaching and learning look in your school and/or classroom:

●

What are the appropriate tools and expectations for the students you serve (teacher-student communication, interaction with peers, organization of

resources, directions and modeling)?

●

What norms have you established with students pertaining to online etiquette and how are they modeled and reinforced?

●

What is the appropriate balance of student agency and teacher control for the students you serve?

●

How should teachers create collaborative spaces (length of time, set up, monitoring) based upon students’ needs?

Please, be mindful that the “food for thoughts” below are not an exhaustive list of how teacher and student behaviors aligned with the expectations of this TEACH

indicator can be observed. It is likely that a modified version of an example listed here is one which is a part of a teacher’s current routine, in response to the students

served. For example, when creating collaborative space for student engagement, teachers may create breakout pairs versus groups, shorten the length of time

students are in breakouts, or use collaborative tools for whole-group engagement, such as online whiteboards (Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi).

● How can teachers ensure that “materials” are being managed by students appropriately?

More food for thought: Teacher models and provides instructions for new tools with students and allows time for students to practice use prior to attempting

curricular tasks; teacher posts rules and norms daily for proper online etiquette and selects students to go over each with their classmates; teacher ensures that all

students can access online materials prior to beginning a task (alternatives should be available for students who are not able to access items (e.g. Google Classroom,

linking Google docs in chat); teacher asks students to briefly unmute and/or turn on camera to show that they have needed items to participate in task (e.g. crayon,

paper, etc.); teacher clearly labels assignments, activities, and assessments to ensure online materials are accessible based on student needs (e.g. Google

Classroom); etc.

● How can teachers ensure that “space” is being used effectively?

More food for thought: Teacher sets up, models, and monitors student collaborative space using purposeful grouping strategies and reminds students of rules and

norms (e.g. Google Docs, Jamboard, Peardeck, Seesaw, Zoom breakouts); students may request to join a breakout as appropriate to review with peers as they work

during flexible grouping (e.g. Zoom); teacher has developed a course homepage with a welcome video, contact information, live lesson calendar, folders, and course

syllabus that students are directed to/reminded to check during lesson tasks as needed (e.g. Google Classroom); etc.

● How can teachers support building student agency?

More food for thought: Teacher models screen sharing and/or document sharing and supports students in sharing their work with classmates for feedback and

assistance (e.g. Zoom, Google Docs); teacher partners students with peers in a brief breakout room to discuss their process for solving a problem or coming to a

conclusion (e.g. Zoom); teacher includes student voice by allowing them to answer questions posed by peers or give examples of personal connection to content (e.g.

Zoom chat, camera, or mic); teacher reinforces student participation by modeling responses to chat posts and discussions (e.g. Zoom, Flipgrid); teacher displays

diverse and positive examples of student work (written assignments, audio files, video, etc.) within the learning platform or online bulletin board (e.g. Google

Classroom, Seesaw, Pear Deck); students and teacher co-create class norms or task rules and reflect on progress at the end of class to their level of participation and

interactions with others (e.g. Google Form, poll, Emoticon); ; in collaborative contexts such as breakout rooms, students show evidence of being able to assign roles to

each other to keep interactions smooth and promote engagement (e.g: timekeeper, recorder, reporter); etc.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 7. Cultivate a supportive learning community

To support student learning and well-being, teachers cultivate and model competencies such as self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and responsible decision making. By

creating a safe and welcoming classroom environment that nurtures strong relationships, teachers create opportunities for student voice, leadership, and agency.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (4)

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE VIRTUALLY

WHAT THIS MAY LOOK LIKE IN OUR SCHOOL

EFFECTIVE (3)

● Students support one

another through

ffirmation,

encouragement,

demonstrated empathy, or

other supportive actions.

● Teacher inquires about

nd is responsive to

student needs an

perspective during

instructional delivery.

● Students feel safe

sharing thei

per

spective, which may

differ from a majority o

others.

● Students or teacher initiates brain breaks

or refocusing activities; students join the

conversation through the chat if they do

not want to participate on camera or

microphone.

● Students take the lead in whole group or

breakout groups by sharing their screen to

show visual or explain their thought

process, or by taking leader role (e.g. note-

taker, time-keeper).

● Students share their personal connection

to new learning with peers on teacher

created discussion board, breakout, or

video reflection (e.g. Flipgrid); teacher may

post a thought-provoking question raised

by a student to the class in the chat.

● Students self-assess group work though a

virtual survey/poll for reflection and areas

of improvement; students show peer

support though online tools (e.g.

emoticons in chat, thumbs up on camera,

etc.)

● Hearing feedback noise or disruption,

teacher reminds students of virtual

etiquette and requests that all students

turn off microphones/ video, then quickly

mutes those noncompliant or sends them

to the waiting room for correction prior to

re-entry.

● Students demonstrate

effective coping

trategies

or use

supports teacher has put

in place for coping.

● Teacher implements

routines and practice

hat appropriately build

student leadership

● Teacher implements

practices that encoura

he inclusion of one

another and one

another’s ideas.

● Teacher cultivates a

ositive

, supportive

classroom community and

student awareness of

their impact within the

classroom

● When needed, teacher

appropriately addresses,

redirects or de-escalates

tudent misbehavior or

disruption

in a manner

that solves the issue with

minimal disruption to the

lesson or other student

learning.

Coping strategies refer to coping with stress, conflict, frustration, and other challenging situations or feelings.

Building student leadership can include providing discrete and/or substantive roles for students or verbally encouraging students to step into leadership opportunities.

This may include, but is not limited to, how the teacher welcomes and accepts student ideas and contributions to the classroom, how the identities, backgrounds, and lived experiences of students in the classroom community are reflected,

generating and establishing classroom agreements or contracts with students.

This may include but is not limited to teacher’s verbal and non-verbal communication, how the teacher encourages positive relationships, or the use of Three Signature Practices, restorative circles, affective statements, or other strategies.

This may be seen in how teacher and/or students support one another through affirmation, recognition, demonstrated empathy, encouragement, or other supportive actions

Evidence may include student reflection or acknowledgment of the impact of their words or actions on others, the ideas or ways they contribute, or the value and assets of their background and/or experiences.

See Level 1 teacher interventions and responses in the Student Code of Conduct. Throughout, teacher respects students’ dignity and is sensitive to students’ needs when addressing misbehavior.

Off-task behavior may be present from a student with an applicable Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) or a Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP). In these cases, a teacher would be observed adhering to the strategies and interventions outlined by

the FBA or BIP.

Instructional Framework Rubric: Remote Teaching & Learning Companion Updated: 11/23/20

TEACH 7. Cultivate a supportive learning community

THINK ABOUTS AND DISCUSSION POINTS FOR VIRTUAL LEARNING IN OUR SCHOOL

The “what this may look like virtually” examples for this TEACH indicator are research-based and serve as a starting point for what teaching and learning looks like in

the remote learning environment in your school. When considering how teaching and learning look in your school and/or classroom:

●

What are the appropriate tools and expectations for the students you serve (teacher-student communication, interaction with peers, organization of

resources, directions and modeling)?

●

What norms have you established with students pertaining to online etiquette and how are they modeled and reinforced?

●

What is the appropriate balance of student agency and teacher control for the students you serve?

●

How should teachers create collaborative spaces (length of time, set up, monitoring) based upon students’ needs?

Please, be mindful that the “food for thoughts” below are not an exhaustive list of how teacher and student behaviors aligned with the expectations of this TEACH

indicator can be observed. It is likely that a modified version of an example listed here is one which is a part of a teacher’s current routine, in response to the students

served. For example, when creating collaborative space for student engagement, teachers may create breakout pairs versus groups, shorten the length of time

students are in breakouts, or use collaborative tools for whole-group engagement, such as online whiteboards (Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi).

● How can teachers recognize and assist students in need of support?

More food for thought: Teacher provides quick checks of how students are feeling about the learning to at key points during the lesson to provide responsive supports

and/or lesson adjustments (e.g. Whiteboard.fi, typing in chat); teacher creates alternate asynchronous assignments that are easily accessible for students if they are

not capable of participating in a group discussion today (Google Classroom), teacher sets chat to “Host only” and announces to students that they can send a private

message to the teacher during a 3 minute stretch break with any questions or comments; teacher invites students to give themselves a pat on the back or fist bump or

give them a virtual high five for affirmation; ; structures or systems are in place for students to share their perspective (e.g. circles, Socratic Seminar, use of language

frames for students to share agreement or disagreement); etc.

● How can teachers support students in building leadership skills?

More food for thought: Teacher selects a student each day to act as a “co-host” in Zoom and gives them specific jobs such as monitoring the chat, calling on peers to

respond to questions, reading the objective, etc.; with student permission, teacher shares student work or (asks students to share) as exemplars; teacher assigns

leader role to students in breakout rooms in Zoom or collaborative documents (e.g. Google docs) to facilitate the work; teacher begins each class meeting with a show

and tell to allow a different student each day to share their favorite thing (on camera and/or unmute mic to explain the item); etc.

● How can a positive classroom culture be created and maintained?

More food for thought: Teacher begins the lesson or task with clear expectations posted, explained, and monitored (Google slide); teacher starts the class time with a

positive affirmation, centering technique (breathing or yoga), or music; students are given stretch breaks periodically as needed with a 30 second countdown timer

(online-stopwatch.com); students support each other on camera with snaps or in the chat for doing a good job; teacher posts positive messages to students to begin

class or school day (e.g. post, Google Slide, recoding on ScreenCastify); teacher incorporates optimistic closures and welcoming rituals; students have multiple

opportunities to express level of comfortability throughout the lesson with pacing, understanding of content or need for additional support (e.g. temperature checks,

thumbs up/down, polls, emoticons in chat); etc.

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation

Pre-Observation Conference for Remote Teaching & Learning

Modified November 2020 P | 1

Classroom Teacher Name

School # Position

Qualified Observer’s Name/Position

The classroom teacher and qualified observer document the focus area for the formal observation. Listed below are considerations for

pre-observation conferences for observations of remote teaching and learning. The pre-observation conference form will continue to

be available in the teacher’s queue in OPMS for electronic entry and sharing with their qualified observer.

I. Specific objective(s) for the activity that will be observed

Consider: What will students know and/or be able to do as a result of this lesson?

Consider: What is the lesson outcome? How will you know if students meet this outcome?

II. Activity to be observed

Consider: What will be taught and how will the needs of diverse learners be met?

Consider: What synchronous and/or asynchronous student learning came before this lesson and what will be coming after?

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation

Pre-Observation Conference for Remote Teaching & Learning

Modified November 2020 P | 2

III. Strategies that will be used to accomplish the objectives

Consider: What virtual instructional strategies and/or tools for remote learning will you use? Why?

Consider: How are your instructional choices responsive to what you know about your students?

IV. Special circumstances related to activity observed

Consider: What should the observer be aware of when conducting this observation (ie: Is this a new unit, are you

implementing new routines, are there student attendance or participation concerns)?

V. Other Comments

Classroom Teacher’s Signature: Date: ______________

Qualified Observer’s Signature: Date: ______________

Baltimore City Public Schools. City Schools Online Resource Hub, 2020.

Baltimore City Public Schools. District Policies. August 2020.

Baltimore County Public Schools. Final Rubric for Remote Teaching and Learning, September 2020.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Online Learning. 2020.

Lucky Little Learners. Zoom Activities to Use with Distance Learning. April 2020.

National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. Instructional Strategies for Virtual Learning: A Companion Tool to the NIET

Teaching Standards Rubric. September 2020.

Pennsylvania Department of Education. Rubric Assessment: Online Educators. June 2015.

Roblyer, M.D. and Ekhaml, L. How Interactive are Your Distance Courses? A Rubric for Assessing Interaction in Distance

Learning, June 2020.

The Danielson Group. The Framework for Remote Teaching. 2020.

The National Standards for Quality Online Learning (NSQ), 2020.

REFERENCES

Download
Save PDF to desktop

Email
Email completed PDF

Send for Signing
Email for others to sign

Print
Print document

NAME

IF Remote Learning Full Fillable

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank IF Remote Learning Full Fillable Form

Related forms

Fillable IF Remote Learning Full Fillable

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank IF Remote Learning Full Fillable Form

Related forms

First 20 documents completely FREE!