Fillable Classroom Environment Survey Fall2006 (Pierpont Community and Technical College)

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank Classroom Environment Survey Fall2006 (Pierpont Community and Technical College) Form

Use Fill to complete blank online PIERPONT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

Classroom Environment Survey Fall2006 (Pierpont Community and Technical College)

On average this form takes 17 minutes to complete

The Classroom Environment Survey Fall2006 (Pierpont Community and Technical College) form is 128 pages long and contains:

  • 0 signatures
  • 0 check-boxes
  • 68 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

U.S.A. forms for Pierpont Community and Technical College

BROWSE PIERPONT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
FAIRMONT STATE
UNIVERSITY
A Report on the Classroom Environment Survey
Conducted During December 2006
Office of Institutional Research
January 2007
- 2 -
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pursuant to Goal 1 of the FSU Strategic Plan: Empower faculty and students to achieve
high levels of teaching and learning, Year 1 -- Action Step 2, the Office or Institutional
Research was tasked to design and conduct a survey that would provide baseline
measures for various aspects of classroom environments on our campuses.
The use of the service Surveymonkey.org was chosen to facilitate this online survey. 916
initial and follow up emails to all full-time and part-time faculty, active during the Fall
2006 semester, were processed with each containing a brief description of the request for
participation and the web link to the online survey. 248 individuals responded to the
online survey (a response rate of just over 27%).
Major Findings:
Survey items that received the overall highest aggregate ratings:
• 1] How do you rate the overall quality of the lighting levels in your classroom(s)? [Lighting
Levels]
• 2] How do you rate the overall quality of the acoustics in your classroom(s)? [Acoustics]
• 6] How do you rate the overall amount of seating available in your classroom(s)?
[Available Seating]
• 12] How do you rate the overall cleanliness of your classroom(s)? [Cleanliness]
• 4] How do you rate the overall accessibility to your classroom(s) for ADA-compliance?
[ADA-comliance]
• 13] How do you rate the overall number of and convenience to electrical outlets in your
classroom(s)? [Electrical Outlets]
• 14] How do you rate the overall quality of the physical teaching and learning environment
in your classroom(s)? [Physical Teaching/Learning Environment]
• 7] How do you rate the overall type/style [including flexible sizing] and arrangement of
seating available in your classroom(s)? [Seating Style & Arrangement]
Survey items that received the overall lowest aggregate ratings:
• 3] How do you rate the overall heating, cooling, and ventilation comfort levels in your
classroom(s)? [HVAC]
• 8] How do you rate the overall quality of blinds/drapes/shades in place on windows in
your classroom(s)? [Blinds, Drapes, & Shades]
• 9] How do you rate the overall quality of chalkboards, whiteboards, and associated
materials [chalk, dry erase markers, and erasers] in your classroom(s)? [Boards &
Materials]
• 11] How do you rate the overall quality of technology [if appropriate] in your
classroom(s)? [Quality of Technology]
• 15] Does your classroom(s) provide access to more or less technology than you need for
effective instruction? [Access to Technology]
• 10] How do you rate the overall quality and availability of media equipment in your
classroom(s)? [Media Equipment]
• 5] How do you rate the overall dampening of external noise levels to your classroom(s)?
[Dampening External Noise]
65.6% of the faculty respondents indicated that their method of instruction is influenced
by the type of classroom in which they teach and 38% of the rooms that they utilized
contained less than the appropriate amount of technology for effective instruction.
- 3 -
When grouping responses by employment status code, part-time faculty consistently
across all items gave a significantly higher rating than full-time faculty.
When grouping responses by campus code, Non-Fairmont/Main campus [aggregated]
classrooms consistently across all items received a significantly higher rating than Main
Campus classrooms.
When grouping responses by building code [note that all Non-Fairmont classrooms were
coded into the “Other” category for the statistical testing], all 15 survey items showed
significant difference in the mean and ranking of their ratings. In the post hoc analysis,
Wallman Hall, Hardway Hall, and Feaster Center generally exhibited the lower ratings,
while Colebank Hall, the Education Building, and the Other category generally rated
higher.
The following buildings by item show 25% or higher, less than satisfactory ratings:
Lighting Levels
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Wallman Hall
Acoustics
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
HVAC Comfort Level
• Colebank Hall
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
ADA-compliance
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Dampening External Noise
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Available seating
• Feaster Center
Seating style & arrangement
• Education Building
• Feaster Center
- 4 -
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Blinds, Drapes, & Shades
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Wallman Hall
Boards & Materials
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Media Equipment
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Quality of Technology
• Education Building
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Cleanliness
• Feaster Center
• Wallman Hall
Electrical Outlets
• Feaster Center
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Wallman Hall
Physical Teaching/Learning Environment
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
- 5 -
When grouping responses by room type code, a significant difference in ratings were
found in 10 of the 15 main survey items; only items
• Lighting Levels
• Acoustics
• Available Seating
• Seating Style & Arrangement
• Boards & Materials
exhibited no statistically significant difference in the ratings by room type. From this
latter group, only item Boards & Materials appeared in the lower aggregate ratings list.
Descriptive statistics and frequencies were also computed for individual classrooms
[Building and Room], but no additional analyses were performed due to the small sample
size relative to each room [ranging from n=1 to n=8, but generally less than 4 ratings per
class room].
Appendix A of the full report contains the statistical analyses [frequencies, descriptive
statistics]; Crosstabs, chi-square, ANOVA, and the various appropriate non-parametric
tests of the various survey items are available as separate reports.
Respondent’s comments can be found in their entirety in Appendix B of the full report.
A view of the entire survey instrument is available in Appendix C of that report.
End of Executive Summary.
- 6 -
OVERVIEW
Pursuant to Goal 1 of the FSU Strategic Plan: Empower faculty and students to achieve
high levels of teaching and learning, Year 1 -- Action Step 2, the Office or Institutional
Research was tasked to design and conduct a survey that would provide baseline
measures for various aspects of classroom environments on our campuses.
It is expected that this survey [modified appropriately to fit the current environment at
that time] will repeated at regular intervals going forward to determine longitudinal
trends.
METHODOLOGY
The survey instrument utilized was designed in collaboration with several selected
individuals on campus, tested and evaluated by a second group of selected individuals on
campus, and then conducted during the month of December 2006. This survey contains
some items that were utilized at Rutgers University with the appropriate permission
obtained via correspondence.
The use of the service Surveymonkey.org was chosen to facilitate the online survey. 916
initial and follow up emails to all full-time and part-time faculty (active during the Fall
2006 semester) were processed with each containing a brief description of the request for
participation and the web link to the online survey. 248 individuals responded to the
online survey (a response rate of just over 27%).
Appendix A contains the statistical analyses [frequencies, descriptive statistics];
Crosstabs, chi-square, ANOVA with Post Hoc analysis, and the various appropriate non-
parametric tests of the various survey items are available as separate reports.
Respondent’s comments can be found in their entirety in Appendix B of the full report.
A view of the entire survey instrument is available in Appendix C of that report.
An individual faculty member could offer responses to a maximum of four classrooms
that they had utilized during the current semester;
• 81 faculty chose to evaluate only 1 classroom
• 56 faculty chose to evaluate 2 classrooms
• 31 faculty chose to evaluate 3 classrooms
• 42 faculty chose to evaluate 4 classrooms
A total of 464 classroom ratings were offered with full or partial responses via the main
15 items of the survey. A 5-level Likert Scale [1 – Very Poor to 5 – Excellent] was
utilized to rate each of the main survey items with the exception of item 15, which used a
3 level scale. A variety of parametric and non-parametric statistical methods were
utilized for the analysis of the main survey items, grouped by various demographic
categories and the geographical location of the classroom.
- 7 -
Instrument item 16 was a question to determine if generally a faculty member’s teaching
methods were influenced by the type of classroom that they were utilizing.
Instrument item 17 was an open-ended comment area for supplying anecdotal
information that the respondent wished to offer. Appendix B contains the entire list of
comments.
DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE RESPONDENTS TO THE CLASSROOM
ENVIRONMENT SURVEY
FSU/PC&TC School/College of Faculty Member Responding:
Frequency Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid FSU / College of Liberal
Arts
41 16.5 16.5
FSU / College of Science
and Technology
37 14.9 31.5
FSU / School of Business
22 8.9 40.3
FSU / School of Education
31 12.5 52.8
FSU / School of Fine Arts
20 8.1 60.9
FSU / School of Nursing &
Allied Health Admin
10 4.0 64.9
PC&TC / Non-academic-
credit Training Programs
1 .4 65.3
PC&TC / School of
Academic Studies
34 13.7 79.0
PC&TC / School of
Business, Aviation, and
Tech
24 9.7 88.7
PC&TC / School of Health
Careers
13 5.2 94.0
PC&TC / School of Human
Services
15 6.0 100.0
Total
248 100.0
Employment Status
Frequency Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Full-time
154 62.1 62.1
Part-time
94 37.9 100.0
Total
248 100.0
- 8 -
Department
Frequency Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Other
137 55.2 55.2
Behavioral Science
11 4.4 59.7
Biology, Chemistry, and
Geoscience
20 8.1 67.7
Computer Science,
Math, and Physics
12 4.8 72.6
Language and Literature
26 10.5 83.1
Social Science
21 8.5 91.5
Technology
21 8.5 100.0
Total
248 100.0
Survey Item # 16]
Is your method of instruction generally
influenced by the type of room in which you teach?
Frequency Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid No
Response
39 15.7 15.7
No
72 29.0 44.8
Yes
137 55.2 100.0
Total
248 100.0
TYPE OF ROOM
Room Type Code
Frequency Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Computing Laboratory
58 12.5 12.5
Large Lecture Hall
18 3.9 16.4
Science Laboratory
38 8.2 24.6
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 3.9 28.4
Smart Classroom
15 3.2 31.7
Typical Lecture Room
317 68.3 100.0
Total
464 100.0
- 9 -
GEOGRAPHICS OF THE CLASSROOM
Campus Code
Frequency Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Fairmont/Main
384 82.8 82.8
Not Fairmont/Main
80 17.2 100.0
Total
464 100.0
Building Code
Frequency Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Colebank Hall
15 3.2 3.2
Education Bldg
60 12.9 16.2
Falcon Center
1 .2 16.4
Feaster Center
11 2.4 18.8
Hardway Hall
50 10.8 29.6
Hunt Haught Hall
63 13.6 43.2
Jaynes Hall
104 22.4 65.7
Library
4 .9 66.5
Wallman Hall
55 11.9 78.4
Other
100 21.6 100.0
Total
463 99.8
Missing System
1 .2
Total
464 100.0
- 10 -
RESULTS
Survey items that received the overall highest aggregate ratings:
• 1] How do you rate the overall quality of the lighting levels in your classroom(s)? [Lighting
Levels]
• 2] How do you rate the overall quality of the acoustics in your classroom(s)? [Acoustics]
• 6] How do you rate the overall amount of seating available in your classroom(s)?
[Available Seating]
• 12] How do you rate the overall cleanliness of your classroom(s)? [Cleanliness]
• 4] How do you rate the overall accessibility to your classroom(s) for ADA-compliance?
[ADA-comliance]
• 13] How do you rate the overall number of and convenience to electrical outlets in your
classroom(s)? [Electrical Outlets]
• 14] How do you rate the overall quality of the physical teaching and learning environment
in your classroom(s)? [Physical Teaching/Learning Environment]
• 7] How do you rate the overall type/style [including flexible sizing] and arrangement of
seating available in your classroom(s)? [Seating Style & Arrangement]
Survey items that received the overall lowest aggregate ratings:
• 3] How do you rate the overall heating, cooling, and ventilation comfort levels in your
classroom(s)? [HVAC]
• 8] How do you rate the overall quality of blinds/drapes/shades in place on windows in
your classroom(s)? [Blinds, Drapes, & Shades]
• 9] How do you rate the overall quality of chalkboards, whiteboards, and associated
materials [chalk, dry erase markers, and erasers] in your classroom(s)? [Boards &
Materials]
• 11] How do you rate the overall quality of technology [if appropriate] in your
classroom(s)? [Quality of Technology]
• 15] Does your classroom(s) provide access to more or less technology than you need for
effective instruction? [Access to Technology]
• 10] How do you rate the overall quality and availability of media equipment in your
classroom(s)? [Media Equipment]
• 5] How do you rate the overall dampening of external noise levels to your classroom(s)?
[Dampening External Noise]
65.6% of the faculty respondents indicated that their method of instruction is influenced
by the type of classroom in which they teach and 38% of the rooms that they utilized
contained less than the appropriate amount of technology for effective instruction.
When grouping responses by employment status code, part-time faculty consistently
across all items gave a significantly higher rating than full-time faculty (Mann-Whitney
and t-test).
When grouping responses by campus code, Non-Fairmont [aggregated] classrooms
consistently across all items received a significantly higher rating than Main Campus
classrooms (Mann-Whitney and t-test).
When grouping responses by building code [note that all Non-Fairmont classrooms were
coded into the “Other” category for analysis purposes], all 15 survey items showed
significant difference in the mean and ranking of their ratings. In the post hoc analysis,
Wallman Hall, Hardway Hall, and Feaster Center generally exhibited the lower ratings,
- 11 -
while Colebank Hall, the Education Building, and the Other category generally rated
higher. (ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis) Note that in the statistical testing phase, the
Falcon Center [n=1] and the Library [n=4] were excluded due to the small number of
room evaluations.
The following buildings by item show 25% or higher, less than satisfactory ratings:
Lighting Levels
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Wallman Hall
Acoustics
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
HVAC Comfort Level
• Colebank Hall
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
ADA-compliance
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Dampening External Noise
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Available seating
• Feaster Center
Seating style & arrangement
• Education Building
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Blinds, Drapes, & Shades
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Wallman Hall
Boards & Materials
- 12 -
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Media Equipment
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Quality of Technology
• Education Building
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
Cleanliness
• Feaster Center
• Wallman Hall
Electrical Outlets
• Feaster Center
• Hunt Haught Hall
• Wallman Hall
Physical Teaching/Learning Environment
• Feaster Center
• Hardway Hall
• Jaynes Hall
• Wallman Hall
When grouping responses by room type code, a significant difference in ratings were
found in 10 of the 15 main survey items; only items
• Lighting Levels
• Acoustics
• Available Seating
• Seating Style & Arrangement
• Boards & Materials
showed no statistically significant difference in the ratings by room type. From this latter
group, only item Boards & Materials appeared in the lower aggregate ratings list
(ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis).
General Themes from the Open-end Comments:
• Chalk boards are generally dated and problematic
• Whiteboards need correct cleaning and associated support materials
• Upgrade VCRs with DVD players
- 13 -
• Need greater degree in the consistency of technology from building to building
• Improved media
• Computers in some areas are quite dated, require long boot up and reboot times
• Lighting is consistently out and noisy Hunt Haught Hall
• Support issues with Proxima devices
• Technology in lower-level Hardway and Wallman Halls are substandard
• A need for different classroom styles for different audiences/teaching styles
• Some rooms with over-crowded seating
Descriptive statistics and frequencies were also computed for individual classrooms, but
no additional analyses were performed due to the small sample size relative to each room
[ranging from n=1 to n=8, but generally less than 4 ratings per class room].
- 14 -
Appendix A:
Frequencies [use the Valid Percent column for review when data is missing for any item]
and Descriptive Statistics of the Main 15 Survey Items
1] How do you rate the overall quality of the lighting levels in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
7 1.5 1.6 1.6
Poor
62 13.4 14.1 15.7
Satisfactory
119 25.6 27.0 42.7
Good
142 30.6 32.3 75.0
Excellent
110 23.7 25.0 100.0
Total
440 94.8 100.0
Missing System
24 5.2
Total
464 100.0
2] How do you rate the overall quality of the acoustics in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
17 3.7 3.9 3.9
Poor
48 10.3 10.9 14.8
Satisfactory
133 28.7 30.2 45.0
Good
155 33.4 35.2 80.2
Excellent
87 18.8 19.8 100.0
Total
440 94.8 100.0
Missing System
24 5.2
Total
464 100.0
3] How do you rate the overall heating, cooling, and ventilation comfort levels in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
38 8.2 8.7 8.7
Poor
125 26.9 28.5 37.2
Satisfactory
149 32.1 34.0 71.2
Good
93 20.0 21.2 92.5
Excellent
33 7.1 7.5 100.0
Total
438 94.4 100.0
Missing System
26 5.6
Total
464 100.0
- 15 -
4] How do you rate the overall accessibility to your classroom(s) for ADA-compliance?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
8 1.7 1.9 1.9
Poor
93 20.0 22.1 24.0
Satisfactory
151 32.5 35.9 59.9
Good
91 19.6 21.6 81.5
Excellent
78 16.8 18.5 100.0
Total
421 90.7 100.0
Missing System
43 9.3
Total
464 100.0
5] How do you rate the overall dampening of external noise levels to
your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
45 9.7 10.3 10.3
Poor
93 20.0 21.4 31.7
Satisfactory
136 29.3 31.3 63.0
Good
117 25.2 26.9 89.9
Excellent
44 9.5 10.1 100.0
Total
435 93.8 100.0
Missing System
29 6.3
Total
464 100.0
6] How do you rate the overall amount of seating available in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
16 3.4 3.7 3.7
Poor
52 11.2 11.9 15.6
Satisfactory
162 34.9 37.1 52.6
Good
131 28.2 30.0 82.6
Excellent
76 16.4 17.4 100.0
Total
437 94.2 100.0
Missing System
27 5.8
Total
464 100.0
- 16 -
7] How do you rate the overall type/style [including flexible sizing] and arrangement
of seating available in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
24 5.2 5.5 5.5
Poor
118 25.4 27.2 32.7
Satisfactory
151 32.5 34.8 67.5
Good
94 20.3 21.7 89.2
Excellent
47 10.1 10.8 100.0
Total
434 93.5 100.0
Missing System
30 6.5
Total
464 100.0
8] How do you rate the overall quality of blinds/drapes/shades in place on windows
in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
64 13.8 15.9 15.9
Poor
61 13.1 15.1 31.0
Satisfactory
160 34.5 39.7 70.7
Good
78 16.8 19.4 90.1
Excellent
40 8.6 9.9 100.0
Total
403 86.9 100.0
Missing System
61 13.1
Total
464 100.0
9] How do you rate the overall quality of chalkboards, whiteboards, and associated
materials [chalk, dry erase markers, erasers] in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
49 10.6 11.2 11.2
Poor
91 19.6 20.8 32.0
Satisfactory
156 33.6 35.6 67.6
Good
101 21.8 23.1 90.6
Excellent
41 8.8 9.4 100.0
Total
438 94.4 100.0
Missing System
26 5.6
Total
464 100.0
- 17 -
10] How do you rate the overall quality and availability of media equipment
in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
48 10.3 11.4 11.4
Poor
98 21.1 23.2 34.6
Satisfactory
129 27.8 30.6 65.2
Good
93 20.0 22.0 87.2
Excellent
54 11.6 12.8 100.0
Total
422 90.9 100.0
Missing System
42 9.1
Total
464 100.0
11] How do you rate the overall quality of technology [if appropriate] in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
49 10.6 12.6 12.6
Poor
96 20.7 24.6 37.2
Satisfactory
109 23.5 27.9 65.1
Good
80 17.2 20.5 85.6
Excellent
56 12.1 14.4 100.0
Total
390 84.1 100.0
Missing System
74 15.9
Total
464 100.0
12] How do you rate the overall cleanliness of your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
24 5.2 5.5 5.5
Poor
50 10.8 11.4 16.9
Satisfactory
187 40.3 42.8 59.7
Good
97 20.9 22.2 81.9
Excellent
79 17.0 18.1 100.0
Total
437 94.2 100.0
Missing System
27 5.8
Total
464 100.0
- 18 -
13] How do you rate the overall number of and convenience to electrical outlets in
your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
22 4.7 5.1 5.1
Poor
84 18.1 19.4 24.5
Satisfactory
183 39.4 42.4 66.9
Good
91 19.6 21.1 88.0
Excellent
52 11.2 12.0 100.0
Total
432 93.1 100.0
Missing System
32 6.9
Total
464 100.0
14] How do you rate the overall quality of the physical teaching and learning
Environment in your classroom(s)?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Very Poor
22 4.7 5.0 5.0
Poor
93 20.0 21.2 26.2
Satisfactory
163 35.1 37.1 63.3
Good
117 25.2 26.7 90.0
Excellent
44 9.5 10.0 100.0
Total
439 94.6 100.0
Missing System
25 5.4
Total
464 100.0
15] Does your classroom(s) provide access to more or less technology than you need
for effective instruction?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Access to LESS technology
than required
168 36.2 38.0 38.0
The appropriate amount of
technology
237 51.1 53.6 91.6
Access to MORE
technology than required
37 8.0 8.4 100.0
Total
442 95.3 100.0
Missing System
22 4.7
Total
464 100.0
- 19 -
Descriptive Statistics
Items 1-14 coded as: [1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Satisfactory, 4=Good, 5=Excellent]
Item 15 coded as: [1=Less technology than required, 2=Appropriate amount,
3=More technology than required]
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
1] How do you rate the
overall quality of the lighting
levels in your classroom(s)?
440 1 5 3.65 1.052
2] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
acoustics in your
classroom(s)?
440 1 5 3.56 1.046
3] How do you rate the
overall heating, cooling,
and ventilation comfort
levels in your classroom(s)?
438 1 5 2.90 1.067
4] How do you rate the
overall accessibility to your
classroom(s) for ADA-
compliance?
421 1 5 3.33 1.072
5] How do you rate the
overall dampening of
external noise levels to your
classroom(s)?
435 1 5 3.05 1.141
6] How do you rate the
overall amount of seating
available in your
classroom(s)?
437 1 5 3.46 1.028
7] How do you rate the
overall type/style [including
flexible sizing] and
arrangement of seating
available in your
classroom(s)?
434 1 5 3.05 1.069
8] How do you rate the
overall quality of
blinds/drapes/shades in
place on windows in your
classroom(s)?
403 1 5 2.92 1.172
9] How do you rate the
overall quality of
chalkboards, whiteboards,
and associated materials
[chalk, dry erase markers,
erasers] in your
classroom(s)?
438 1 5 2.99 1.124
- 20 -
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
10] How do you rate the
overall quality and
availability of media
equipment in your
classroom(s)?
422 1 5 3.02 1.193
11] How do you rate the
overall quality of technology
[if appropriate] in your
classroom(s)?
390 1 5 2.99 1.238
12] How do you rate the
overall cleanliness of your
classroom(s)?
437 1 5 3.36 1.074
13] How do you rate the
overall number of and
convenience to electrical
outlets in your
classroom(s)?
432 1 5 3.16 1.034
14] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
physical teaching and
learning environment in
your classroom(s)?
439 1 5 3.15 1.029
15] Does your classroom(s)
provide access to more or
less technology than you
need for effective
instruction?
442 1 3 1.70 .614
- 21 -
Item Descriptive Statistics Grouped by Employment Status
Faculty Status N [Rooms] Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Full-time Faculty
331 3.56 1.084 .060
1] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
lighting levels in your
classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
109 3.93 .900 .086
Full-time Faculty
329 3.47 1.056 .058
2] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
acoustics in your
classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
111 3.82 .974 .092
Full-time Faculty
328 2.76 1.011 .056
3] How do you rate the
overall heating,
cooling, and ventilation
comfort levels in your
classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
110 3.34 1.119 .107
Full-time Faculty
315 3.18 1.054 .059
4] How do you rate the
overall accessibility to
your classroom(s) for
ADA-compliance?
Part-time Faculty
106 3.76 1.010 .098
Full-time Faculty
325 2.91 1.098 .061
5] How do you rate the
overall dampening of
external noise levels to
your classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
110 3.46 1.171 .112
Full-time Faculty
327 3.35 1.026 .057
6] How do you rate the
overall amount of
seating available in
your classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
110 3.75 .979 .093
Full-time Faculty
326 2.97 1.058 .059
7] How do you rate the
overall type/style
[including flexible
sizing] and
arrangement of seating
available in your
classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
108 3.30 1.070 .103
Full-time Faculty
304 2.78 1.128 .065
8] How do you rate the
overall quality of
blinds/drapes/shades
in place on windows in
your classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
99 3.35 1.206 .121
Full-time Faculty
330 2.90 1.120 .062
9] How do you rate the
overall quality of
chalkboards,
whiteboards, and
associated materials
[chalk, dry erase
markers, erasers] in
your classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
108 3.26 1.097 .106
Full-time Faculty
317 2.91 1.183 .066
10] How do you rate
the overall quality and
availability of media
equipment in your
classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
105 3.34 1.167 .114
Full-time Faculty
290 2.88 1.224 .072
11] How do you rate
the overall quality of
technology [if
Part-time Faculty
100 3.33 1.223 .122
- 22 -
appropriate] in your
classroom(s)?
Full-time Faculty
327 3.19 1.014 .056
12] How do you rate
the overall cleanliness
of your classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
110 3.85 1.099 .105
Full-time Faculty
324 2.98 .995 .055
13] How do you rate
the overall number of
and convenience to
electrical outlets in
your classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
108 3.68 .975 .094
Full-time Faculty
329 3.03 1.028 .057
14] How do you rate
the overall quality of
the physical teaching
and learning
environment in your
classroom(s)?
Part-time Faculty
110 3.52 .946 .090
Full-time Faculty
331 1.66 .590 .032
15] Does your
classroom(s) provide
access to more or less
technology than you
need for effective
instruction?
Part-time Faculty
111 1.85 .663 .063
Item Descriptive Statistics Grouped by Campus Code
Campus Code N [Rooms] Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Fairmont/Main
363 3.56 1.048 .055
1] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
lighting levels in your
classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
77 4.08 .970 .111
Fairmont/Main
363 3.48 1.028 .054
2] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
acoustics in your
classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
77 3.96 1.044 .119
Fairmont/Main
361 2.78 1.007 .053
3] How do you rate the
overall heating, cooling,
and ventilation comfort
levels in your
classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
77 3.47 1.165 .133
Fairmont/Main
346 3.19 1.047 .056
4] How do you rate the
overall accessibility to
your classroom(s) for
ADA-compliance?
Not Fairmont/Main
75 3.95 .971 .112
Fairmont/Main
358 2.91 1.098 .058
5] How do you rate the
overall dampening of
external noise levels to
your classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
77 3.73 1.096 .125
Fairmont/Main
359 3.37 1.038 .055
6] How do you rate the
overall amount of
seating available in
your classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
78 3.83 .889 .101
Fairmont/Main
356 2.97 1.038 .055
7] How do you rate the
overall type/style
[including flexible
Not Fairmont/Main
78 3.42 1.134 .128
- 23 -
sizing] and
arrangement of seating
available in your
classroom(s)?
Fairmont/Main
329 2.72 1.093 .060
8] How do you rate the
overall quality of
blinds/drapes/shades in
place on windows in
your classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
74 3.81 1.106 .129
Fairmont/Main
360 2.85 1.085 .057
9] How do you rate the
overall quality of
chalkboards,
whiteboards, and
associated materials
[chalk, dry erase
markers, erasers] in
your classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
78 3.63 1.082 .123
Fairmont/Main
348 2.93 1.149 .062
10] How do you rate the
overall quality and
availability of media
equipment in your
classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
74 3.42 1.314 .153
Fairmont/Main
319 2.90 1.186 .066
11] How do you rate the
overall quality of
technology [if
appropriate] in your
classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
71 3.44 1.370 .163
Fairmont/Main
359 3.16 1.010 .053
12] How do you rate the
overall cleanliness of
your classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
78 4.29 .839 .095
Fairmont/Main
355 3.02 .986 .052
13] How do you rate the
overall number of and
convenience to
electrical outlets in your
classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
77 3.79 1.017 .116
Fairmont/Main
361 3.04 .987 .052
14] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
physical teaching and
learning environment in
your classroom(s)?
Not Fairmont/Main
78 3.71 1.046 .118
Fairmont/Main
363 1.64 .585 .031
15] Does your
classroom(s) provide
access to more or less
technology than you
need for effective
instruction?
Not Fairmont/Main
79 2.00 .660 .074
- 24 -
Item Frequencies -- Grouped by Campus Codes [Fairmont/Main, Caperton Center, All Others]
1] How do you rate the overall quality of the lighting levels in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
6 1.6 1.7 1.7
Poor
57 14.8 15.7 17.4
Satisfactory
107 27.9 29.5 46.8
Good
114 29.7 31.4 78.2
Excellent
79 20.6 21.8 100.0
Valid
Total
363 94.5 100.0
Missing System
21 5.5
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 1 2.3 2.3 2.3
Satisfactory
3 6.8 7.0 9.3
Good
17 38.6 39.5 48.8
Excellent
22 50.0 51.2 100.0
Valid
Total
43 97.7 100.0
Missing System
1 2.3
Caperton Center
Total
44 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
1 2.8 2.9 2.9
Poor
4 11.1 11.8 14.7
Satisfactory
9 25.0 26.5 41.2
Good
11 30.6 32.4 73.5
Excellent
9 25.0 26.5 100.0
Total
34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
Total
36 100.0
2] How do you rate the overall quality of the acoustics in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
16 4.2 4.4 4.4
Poor
40 10.4 11.0 15.4
Satisfactory
120 31.3 33.1 48.5
Good
129 33.6 35.5 84.0
Excellent
58 15.1 16.0 100.0
Valid
Total
363 94.5 100.0
Missing System
21 5.5
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 2 4.5 4.5 4.5
Satisfactory
4 9.1 9.1 13.6
Caperton Center Valid
Good
16 36.4 36.4 50.0
- 25 -
Excellent
22 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
1 2.8 3.0 3.0
Poor 6 16.7 18.2 21.2
Satisfactory 9 25.0 27.3 48.5
Good
10 27.8 30.3 78.8
Excellent
7 19.4 21.2 100.0
Total
33 91.7 100.0
Missing System
3 8.3
Total
36 100.0
3] How do you rate the overall heating, cooling, and ventilation comfort levels in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped] Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
30 7.8 8.3 8.3
Poor
119 31.0 33.0 41.3
Satisfactory
132 34.4 36.6 77.8
Good
59 15.4 16.3 94.2
Excellent
21 5.5 5.8 100.0
Valid
Total
361 94.0 100.0
Missing System
23 6.0
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Very Poor
2 4.5 4.5 4.5
Poor
1 2.3 2.3 6.8
Satisfactory
8 18.2 18.2 25.0
Good
22 50.0 50.0 75.0
Excellent
11 25.0 25.0 100.0
Caperton Center Valid
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Very Poor 6 16.7 18.2 18.2
Poor 5 13.9 15.2 33.3
Satisfactory
9 25.0 27.3 60.6
Good
12 33.3 36.4 97.0
Excellent
1 2.8 3.0 100.0
Valid
Total
33 91.7 100.0
Missing System
3 8.3
Total
36 100.0
- 26 -
4] How do you rate the overall accessibility to your classroom(s) for ADA-compliance?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
7 1.8 2.0 2.0
Poor
89 23.2 25.7 27.7
Satisfactory
132 34.4 38.2 65.9
Good
66 17.2 19.1 85.0
Excellent
52 13.5 15.0 100.0
Valid
Total
346 90.1 100.0
Missing System
38 9.9
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Very Poor
1 2.3 2.4 2.4
Poor
4 9.1 9.8 12.2
Satisfactory
7 15.9 17.1 29.3
Good
14 31.8 34.1 63.4
Excellent
15 34.1 36.6 100.0
Valid
Total
41 93.2 100.0
Missing System
3 6.8
Caperton Center
Total
44 100.0
Satisfactory 12 33.3 35.3 35.3
Good 11 30.6 32.4 67.6
Excellent
11 30.6 32.4 100.0
Valid
Total
34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
All others
Total
36 100.0
5] How do you rate the overall dampening of external noise levels to your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped] Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
44 11.5 12.3 12.3
Poor
80 20.8 22.3 34.6
Satisfactory
122 31.8 34.1 68.7
Good
90 23.4 25.1 93.9
Excellent
22 5.7 6.1 100.0
Valid
Total
358 93.2 100.0
Missing System
26 6.8
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 2 4.5 4.7 4.7
Satisfactory
7 15.9 16.3 20.9
Good
15 34.1 34.9 55.8
Excellent
19 43.2 44.2 100.0
Valid
Total
43 97.7 100.0
Caperton Center
Missing System
1 2.3
- 27 -
Total
44 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
1 2.8 2.9 2.9
Poor
11 30.6 32.4 35.3
Satisfactory
7 19.4 20.6 55.9
Good
12 33.3 35.3 91.2
Excellent
3 8.3 8.8 100.0
Total
34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
Total
36 100.0
6] How do you rate the overall amount of seating available in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
16 4.2 4.5 4.5
Poor
48 12.5 13.4 17.8
Satisfactory
136 35.4 37.9 55.7
Good
104 27.1 29.0 84.7
Excellent
55 14.3 15.3 100.0
Valid
Total
359 93.5 100.0
Missing System
25 6.5
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 3 6.8 6.8 6.8
Satisfactory
12 27.3 27.3 34.1
Good
17 38.6 38.6 72.7
Excellent
12 27.3 27.3 100.0
Caperton Center Valid
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Valid Poor
1 2.8 2.9 2.9
Satisfactory 14 38.9 41.2 44.1
Good 10 27.8 29.4 73.5
Excellent 9 25.0 26.5 100.0
Total
34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
Total
36 100.0
7] How do you rate the overall type/style [including flexible sizing] and arrangement of seating
available in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
22 5.7 6.2 6.2
Poor
103 26.8 28.9 35.1
Satisfactory
123 32.0 34.6 69.7
Good
80 20.8 22.5 92.1
Excellent
28 7.3 7.9 100.0
Fairmont / Main Valid
Total
356 92.7 100.0
- 28 -
Missing System
28 7.3
Total
384 100.0
Poor 5 11.4 11.4 11.4
Satisfactory
18 40.9 40.9 52.3
Good
9 20.5 20.5 72.7
Excellent
12 27.3 27.3 100.0
Caperton Center Valid
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
2 5.6 5.9 5.9
Poor 10 27.8 29.4 35.3
Satisfactory 10 27.8 29.4 64.7
Good
5 13.9 14.7 79.4
Excellent
7 19.4 20.6 100.0
Total
34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
Total
36 100.0
8] How do you rate the overall quality of blinds/drapes/shades in place on windows in your
classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped] Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
61 15.9 18.5 18.5
Poor
57 14.8 17.3 35.9
Satisfactory
137 35.7 41.6 77.5
Good
60 15.6 18.2 95.7
Excellent
14 3.6 4.3 100.0
Valid
Total
329 85.7 100.0
Missing System
55 14.3
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 3 6.8 7.1 7.1
Satisfactory
11 25.0 26.2 33.3
Good
12 27.3 28.6 61.9
Excellent
16 36.4 38.1 100.0
Valid
Total
42 95.5 100.0
Missing System
2 4.5
Caperton Center
Total
44 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
3 8.3 9.4 9.4
Poor
1 2.8 3.1 12.5
Satisfactory
12 33.3 37.5 50.0
Good
6 16.7 18.8 68.8
Excellent
10 27.8 31.3 100.0
Total
32 88.9 100.0
Missing System
4 11.1
Total
36 100.0
- 29 -
9] How do you rate the overall quality of chalkboards, whiteboards, and associated materials [chalk,
dry erase markers, erasers] in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped] Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
48 12.5 13.3 13.3
Poor
79 20.6 21.9 35.3
Satisfactory
133 34.6 36.9 72.2
Good
80 20.8 22.2 94.4
Excellent
20 5.2 5.6 100.0
Valid
Total
360 93.8 100.0
Missing System
24 6.3
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 4 9.1 9.1 9.1
Satisfactory
9 20.5 20.5 29.5
Good
15 34.1 34.1 63.6
Excellent
16 36.4 36.4 100.0
Caperton Center Valid
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
1 2.8 2.9 2.9
Poor 8 22.2 23.5 26.5
Satisfactory 14 38.9 41.2 67.6
Good
6 16.7 17.6 85.3
Excellent
5 13.9 14.7 100.0
Total
34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
Total
36 100.0
10] How do you rate the overall quality and availability of media equipment in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped] Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
41 10.7 11.8 11.8
Poor
84 21.9 24.1 35.9
Satisfactory
116 30.2 33.3 69.3
Good
72 18.8 20.7 89.9
Excellent
35 9.1 10.1 100.0
Valid
Total
348 90.6 100.0
Missing System
36 9.4
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 4 9.1 9.8 9.8
Satisfactory
9 20.5 22.0 31.7
Good
12 27.3 29.3 61.0
Excellent
16 36.4 39.0 100.0
Valid
Total
41 93.2 100.0
Caperton Center
Missing System
3 6.8
- 30 -
Total
44 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
7 19.4 21.2 21.2
Poor
10 27.8 30.3 51.5
Satisfactory
4 11.1 12.1 63.6
Good
9 25.0 27.3 90.9
Excellent
3 8.3 9.1 100.0
Total
33 91.7 100.0
Missing System
3 8.3
Total
36 100.0
11] How do you rate the overall quality of technology [if appropriate] in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
42 10.9 13.2 13.2
Poor
82 21.4 25.7 38.9
Satisfactory
96 25.0 30.1 69.0
Good
65 16.9 20.4 89.3
Excellent
34 8.9 10.7 100.0
Valid
Total
319 83.1 100.0
Missing System
65 16.9
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 7 15.9 17.1 17.1
Satisfactory
4 9.1 9.8 26.8
Good
12 27.3 29.3 56.1
Excellent
18 40.9 43.9 100.0
Valid
Total
41 93.2 100.0
Missing System
3 6.8
Caperton Center
Total
44 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
7 19.4 23.3 23.3
Poor
7 19.4 23.3 46.7
Satisfactory
9 25.0 30.0 76.7
Good
3 8.3 10.0 86.7
Excellent
4 11.1 13.3 100.0
Total
30 83.3 100.0
Missing System
6 16.7
Total
36 100.0
12] How do you rate the overall cleanliness of your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
24 6.3 6.7 6.7
Poor
49 12.8 13.6 20.3
Fairmont / Main Valid
Satisfactory
171 44.5 47.6 68.0
- 31 -
Good
77 20.1 21.4 89.4
Excellent
38 9.9 10.6 100.0
Total
359 93.5 100.0
Missing System
25 6.5
Total
384 100.0
Satisfactory 1 2.3 2.3 2.3
Good 11 25.0 25.0 27.3
Excellent
32 72.7 72.7 100.0
Caperton Center Valid
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Valid Poor
1 2.8 2.9 2.9
Satisfactory
15 41.7 44.1 47.1
Good 9 25.0 26.5 73.5
Excellent 9 25.0 26.5 100.0
Total 34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
Total
36 100.0
13] How do you rate the overall number of and convenience to electrical outlets in your
classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
18 4.7 5.1 5.1
Poor
82 21.4 23.1 28.2
Satisfactory
164 42.7 46.2 74.4
Good
58 15.1 16.3 90.7
Excellent
33 8.6 9.3 100.0
Valid
Total
355 92.4 100.0
Missing System
29 7.6
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Satisfactory 7 15.9 15.9 15.9
Good 22 50.0 50.0 65.9
Excellent
15 34.1 34.1 100.0
Caperton Center Valid
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
4 11.1 12.1 12.1
Poor
2 5.6 6.1 18.2
Satisfactory 12 33.3 36.4 54.5
Good 11 30.6 33.3 87.9
Excellent
4 11.1 12.1 100.0
Total
33 91.7 100.0
Missing System
3 8.3
Total
36 100.0
- 32 -
14] How do you rate the overall quality of the physical teaching and learning
environment in your classroom(s)?
Campus Code
[Grouped] Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor
18 4.7 5.0 5.0
Poor
88 22.9 24.4 29.4
Satisfactory
145 37.8 40.2 69.5
Good
83 21.6 23.0 92.5
Excellent
27 7.0 7.5 100.0
Valid
Total
361 94.0 100.0
Missing System
23 6.0
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Poor 2 4.5 4.5 4.5
Satisfactory
6 13.6 13.6 18.2
Good
22 50.0 50.0 68.2
Excellent
14 31.8 31.8 100.0
Caperton Center Valid
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Valid Very Poor
4 11.1 11.8 11.8
Poor 3 8.3 8.8 20.6
Satisfactory 12 33.3 35.3 55.9
Good
12 33.3 35.3 91.2
Excellent
3 8.3 8.8 100.0
Total
34 94.4 100.0
Missing System
2 5.6
Total
36 100.0
15] Does your classroom(s) provide access to more or less technology than you
need for effective instruction?
Campus Code
[Grouped]
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Access to LESS
technology than
required
151 39.3 41.6 41.6
The appropriate
amount of
technology
192 50.0 52.9 94.5
Access to MORE
technology than
required
20 5.2 5.5 100.0
Valid
Total
363 94.5 100.0
Missing System
21 5.5
Fairmont / Main
Total
384 100.0
Access to LESS
technology than
required
6 13.6 13.6 13.6
Caperton Center Valid
The appropriate
amount of
technology
27 61.4 61.4 75.0
- 33 -
Access to MORE
technology than
required
11 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total
44 100.0 100.0
All others Access to LESS
technology than
required
11 30.6 31.4 31.4
The appropriate
amount of
technology
18 50.0 51.4 82.9
Access to MORE
technology than
required
6 16.7 17.1 100.0
Valid
Total
35 97.2 100.0
Missing System
1 2.8
Total
36 100.0
Item Descriptive Statistics Group by Building Code
Building Code N [Rooms] Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
Colebank Hall
15 3.73 .594 .153
Education Bldg
60 4.23 .945 .122
Falcon Center
1 4.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 3.40 1.075 .340
Hardway Hall
45 3.38 1.029 .153
Hunt Haught Hall
62 3.32 1.021 .130
Jaynes Hall
101 3.53 1.054 .105
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
50 3.06 .890 .126
Other
91 4.01 .983 .103
1] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
lighting levels in your
classroom(s)?
Total
439 3.65 1.051 .050
Colebank Hall
15 3.60 .828 .214
Education Bldg
60 4.00 .844 .109
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.00 .943 .298
Hardway Hall
45 3.13 1.014 .151
Hunt Haught Hall
61 3.56 .940 .120
Jaynes Hall
101 3.50 .996 .099
Library
4 4.25 .500 .250
Wallman Hall
50 3.10 1.129 .160
Other
92 3.95 .987 .103
2] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
acoustics in your
classroom(s)?
Total
439 3.56 1.047 .050
Colebank Hall
15 2.80 .775 .200
Education Bldg
57 3.42 .706 .093
3] How do you rate the
overall heating,
cooling, and ventilation
comfort levels in your
Falcon Center
1 2.00 . .
- 34 -
Feaster Center
10 2.40 .699 .221
Hardway Hall
45 2.38 1.072 .160
Hunt Haught Hall
61 2.59 .883 .113
Jaynes Hall
101 2.89 1.076 .107
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
50 2.38 .901 .127
Other
93 3.34 1.128 .117
classroom(s)?
Total
437 2.91 1.068 .051
Colebank Hall
15 4.00 .926 .239
Education Bldg
60 3.65 1.022 .132
Falcon Center
1 4.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.70 1.160 .367
Hardway Hall
41 3.17 1.046 .163
Hunt Haught Hall
55 2.85 1.096 .148
Jaynes Hall
96 3.09 .895 .091
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
48 2.83 .907 .131
Other
90 3.88 .981 .103
4] How do you rate the
overall accessibility to
your classroom(s) for
ADA-compliance?
Total
420 3.33 1.071 .052
Colebank Hall
15 3.60 .632 .163
Education Bldg
59 3.56 .856 .111
Falcon Center
1 2.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 1.40 .699 .221
Hardway Hall
45 2.71 1.218 .182
Hunt Haught Hall
62 3.02 .757 .096
Jaynes Hall
101 2.84 1.075 .107
Library
4 4.75 .500 .250
Wallman Hall
47 2.13 1.055 .154
Other
90 3.64 1.074 .113
5] How do you rate the
overall dampening of
external noise levels to
your classroom(s)?
Total
434 3.05 1.141 .055
Colebank Hall
14 3.93 .730 .195
Education Bldg
59 3.46 1.250 .163
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.30 .675 .213
Hardway Hall
43 3.30 .914 .139
Hunt Haught Hall
62 3.50 1.020 .130
Jaynes Hall
101 3.31 .987 .098
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
50 3.12 .940 .133
Other
92 3.83 .885 .092
6] How do you rate the
overall amount of
seating available in
your classroom(s)?
Total
436 3.45 1.028 .049
7] How do you rate the Colebank Hall
15 2.93 .799 .206
- 35 -
Education Bldg
58 3.26 1.133 .149
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.00 .471 .149
Hardway Hall
45 2.89 1.027 .153
Hunt Haught Hall
61 3.00 1.033 .132
Jaynes Hall
98 2.96 1.025 .104
Library
4 3.25 .500 .250
Wallman Hall
50 2.68 1.019 .144
Other
91 3.45 1.098 .115
overall type/style
[including flexible
sizing] and
arrangement of seating
available in your
classroom(s)?
Total
433 3.05 1.069 .051
Colebank Hall
15 3.13 .640 .165
Education Bldg
54 3.56 .793 .108
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
9 2.33 .707 .236
Hardway Hall
44 2.57 .873 .132
Hunt Haught Hall
59 2.02 1.152 .150
Jaynes Hall
101 2.90 .943 .094
Library
1 4.00 . .
Wallman Hall
31 1.97 1.224 .220
Other
87 3.69 1.103 .118
8] How do you rate the
overall quality of
blinds/drapes/shades
in place on windows in
your classroom(s)?
Total
402 2.92 1.173 .058
Colebank Hall
15 3.67 .976 .252
Education Bldg
60 3.23 1.079 .139
Falcon Center
1 2.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.90 1.287 .407
Hardway Hall
44 2.09 .910 .137
Hunt Haught Hall
62 3.06 .847 .108
Jaynes Hall
101 2.79 .973 .097
Library
4 4.25 .500 .250
Wallman Hall
49 2.37 1.074 .153
Other
91 3.62 1.113 .117
9] How do you rate the
overall quality of
chalkboards,
whiteboards, and
associated materials
[chalk, dry erase
markers, erasers] in
your classroom(s)?
Total
437 2.99 1.124 .054
Colebank Hall
15 3.73 .799 .206
Education Bldg
58 3.28 .951 .125
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.60 1.075 .340
10] How do you rate
the overall quality and
availability of media
equipment in your
classroom(s)?
Hardway Hall
42 2.81 1.042 .161
- 36 -
Hunt Haught Hall
59 3.02 1.167 .152
Jaynes Hall
99 2.81 1.094 .110
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
46 2.22 1.134 .167
Other
87 3.43 1.317 .141
Total
421 3.01 1.193 .058
Colebank Hall
15 3.67 .816 .211
Education Bldg
54 3.19 1.100 .150
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
9 2.56 .882 .294
Hardway Hall
37 2.54 1.070 .176
Hunt Haught Hall
55 3.35 1.022 .138
Jaynes Hall
92 2.68 1.167 .122
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
39 2.13 1.151 .184
Other
84 3.42 1.346 .147
11] How do you rate
the overall quality of
technology [if
appropriate] in your
classroom(s)?
Total
390 2.99 1.238 .063
Colebank Hall
15 3.73 .961 .248
Education Bldg
56 3.73 .904 .121
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.30 .675 .213
Hardway Hall
45 3.04 .852 .127
Hunt Haught Hall
62 3.10 .882 .112
Jaynes Hall
101 3.01 1.015 .101
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
51 2.75 .997 .140
Other
91 4.18 .914 .096
12] How do you rate
the overall cleanliness
of your classroom(s)?
Total
436 3.36 1.074 .051
Colebank Hall
15 3.33 .900 .232
Education Bldg
60 3.48 .930 .120
Falcon Center
1 2.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.90 1.101 .348
Hardway Hall
40 2.85 .580 .092
Hunt Haught Hall
61 2.90 .870 .111
Jaynes Hall
100 2.97 1.039 .104
Library
4 5.00 .000 .000
Wallman Hall
50 2.58 .928 .131
13] How do you rate
the overall number of
and convenience to
electrical outlets in your
classroom(s)?
Other
90 3.70 1.075 .113
- 37 -
Total
431 3.16 1.035 .050
Colebank Hall
15 3.53 .834 .215
Education Bldg
60 3.45 .872 .113
Falcon Center
1 3.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 2.00 .471 .149
Hardway Hall
45 2.82 .912 .136
Hunt Haught Hall
61 3.11 .858 .110
Jaynes Hall
101 3.02 .980 .097
Library
4 4.25 .500 .250
Wallman Hall
50 2.46 1.034 .146
Other
91 3.69 1.019 .107
14] How do you rate
the overall quality of
the physical teaching
and learning
environment in your
classroom(s)?
Total
438 3.15 1.029 .049
Colebank Hall
15 1.87 .352 .091
Education Bldg
60 1.55 .534 .069
Falcon Center
1 1.00 . .
Feaster Center
10 1.50 .527 .167
Hardway Hall
44 1.55 .589 .089
Hunt Haught Hall
62 1.84 .518 .066
Jaynes Hall
101 1.59 .619 .062
Library
3 2.67 .577 .333
Wallman Hall
53 1.58 .633 .087
Other
92 1.95 .652 .068
15] Does your
classroom(s) provide
access to more or less
technology than you
need for effective
instruction?
Total
441 1.70 .614 .029
- 38 -
Item Frequencies -- Grouped by Building Code
1] How do you rate the overall quality of the lighting levels in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Colebank Hall Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
15 100.0 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
2 3.3 3.3 3.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
58 96.7 96.7 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
2 18.2 20.0 20.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
8 72.7 80.0 100.0
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
11 21.6 23.9 23.9
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
35 68.6 76.1 100.0
Valid
Total 46 90.2 100.0
Missing System 5 9.8
Hardway Hall
Total 51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
16 25.4 25.8 25.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
46 73.0 74.2 100.0
Valid
Total
62 98.4 100.0
Missing System
1 1.6
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
16 15.4 15.8 15.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
85 81.7 84.2 100.0
Valid
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
14 25.5 28.0 28.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
36 65.5 72.0 100.0
Total
50 90.9 100.0
- 39 -
Missing System
5 9.1
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
8 8.0 8.8 8.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
83 83.0 91.2 100.0
Valid
Total
91 91.0 100.0
Missing System
9 9.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
2] How do you rate the overall quality of the acoustics in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Colebank Hall Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
15 100.0 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
3 5.0 5.0 5.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
57 95.0 95.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
8 72.7 80.0 80.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
2 18.2 20.0 100.0
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
15 29.4 32.6 32.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
31 60.8 67.4 100.0
Valid
Total 46 90.2 100.0
Missing System 5 9.8
Hardway Hall
Total 51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
8 12.7 13.1 13.1
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
53 84.1 86.9 100.0
Valid
Total
61 96.8 100.0
Missing System
2 3.2
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
12 11.5 11.9 11.9
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
89 85.6 88.1 100.0
Valid
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Jaynes Hall
Missing System
3 2.9
- 40 -
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
10 18.2 20.0 20.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
40 72.7 80.0 100.0
Total
50 90.9 100.0
Missing System
5 9.1
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 9.0 9.8 9.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
83 83.0 90.2 100.0
Valid
Total
92 92.0 100.0
Missing System
8 8.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
3] How do you rate the overall heating, cooling, and ventilation comfort levels in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
6 40.0 40.0 40.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
9 60.0 60.0 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
3 5.0 5.3 5.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
54 90.0 94.7 100.0
Valid
Total
57 95.0 100.0
Missing System
3 5.0
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
5 45.5 50.0 50.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
5 45.5 50.0 100.0
Total 10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
27 52.9 58.7 58.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
19 37.3 41.3 100.0
Valid
Total
46 90.2 100.0
Hardway Hall
Missing System
5 9.8
- 41 -
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
31 49.2 50.8 50.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
30 47.6 49.2 100.0
Valid
Total
61 96.8 100.0
Missing System
2 3.2
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
45 43.3 44.6 44.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
56 53.8 55.4 100.0
Valid
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
25 45.5 50.0 50.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
25 45.5 50.0 100.0
Total
50 90.9 100.0
Missing System
5 9.1
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
20 20.0 21.5 21.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
73 73.0 78.5 100.0
Valid
Total 93 93.0 100.0
Missing System 7 7.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
4] How do you rate the overall accessibility to your classroom(s) for ADA-compliance?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Colebank Hall Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
15 100.0 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
10 16.7 16.7 16.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
50 83.3 83.3 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
4 36.4 40.0 40.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
6 54.5 60.0 100.0
- 42 -
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
16 31.4 38.1 38.1
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
26 51.0 61.9 100.0
Valid
Total 42 82.4 100.0
Missing System 9 17.6
Hardway Hall
Total 51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
21 33.3 38.2 38.2
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
34 54.0 61.8 100.0
Valid
Total
55 87.3 100.0
Missing System
8 12.7
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
24 23.1 25.0 25.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
72 69.2 75.0 100.0
Valid
Total
96 92.3 100.0
Missing System
8 7.7
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
19 34.5 39.6 39.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
29 52.7 60.4 100.0
Total
48 87.3 100.0
Missing System
7 12.7
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
7 7.0 7.8 7.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
83 83.0 92.2 100.0
Valid
Total
90 90.0 100.0
Missing System
10 10.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
5] How do you rate the overall dampening of external noise levels to your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Colebank Hall Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
15 100.0 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
6 10.0 10.2 10.2
Satisfactory through 53 88.3 89.8 100.0
- 43 -
Excellent Rating
Total 59 98.3 100.0
Missing System 1 1.7
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 81.8 90.0 90.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 9.1 10.0 100.0
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System
1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
20 39.2 43.5 43.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
26 51.0 56.5 100.0
Valid
Total 46 90.2 100.0
Missing System
5 9.8
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
13 20.6 21.0 21.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
49 77.8 79.0 100.0
Valid
Total
62 98.4 100.0
Missing System
1 1.6
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
42 40.4 41.6 41.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
59 56.7 58.4 100.0
Valid
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
31 56.4 66.0 66.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
16 29.1 34.0 100.0
Total
47 85.5 100.0
Missing System
8 14.5
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
16 16.0 17.8 17.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
74 74.0 82.2 100.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Valid
Total 90 90.0 100.0
- 44 -
Missing System
10 10.0
Total 100 100.0
6] How do you rate the overall amount of seating available in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
14 93.3 100.0 100.0
Missing System
1 6.7
Colebank Hall
Total 15 100.0
Education Bldg Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
13 21.7 22.0 22.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
46 76.7 78.0 100.0
Total
59 98.3 100.0
Missing System
1 1.7
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
6 54.5 60.0 60.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 36.4 40.0 100.0
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
8 15.7 18.2 18.2
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
36 70.6 81.8 100.0
Valid
Total
44 86.3 100.0
Missing System
7 13.7
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 14.3 14.5 14.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
53 84.1 85.5 100.0
Valid
Total
62 98.4 100.0
Missing System
1 1.6
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
19 18.3 18.8 18.8
Jaynes Hall Valid
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
82 78.8 81.2 100.0
- 45 -
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 16.4 18.0 18.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
41 74.5 82.0 100.0
Total
50 90.9 100.0
Missing System
5 9.1
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
4 4.0 4.3 4.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
88 88.0 95.7 100.0
Valid
Total 92 92.0 100.0
Missing System 8 8.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
7] How do you rate the overall type/style [including flexible sizing] and arrangement of seating
available in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
4 26.7 26.7 26.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
11 73.3 73.3 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
19 31.7 32.8 32.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
39 65.0 67.2 100.0
Valid
Total
58 96.7 100.0
Missing System
2 3.3
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 81.8 90.0 90.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 9.1 10.0 100.0
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Hardway Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
20 39.2 43.5 43.5
- 46 -
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
26 51.0 56.5 100.0
Total
46 90.2 100.0
Missing System
5 9.8
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
18 28.6 29.5 29.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
43 68.3 70.5 100.0
Valid
Total
61 96.8 100.0
Missing System
2 3.2
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
36 34.6 36.7 36.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
62 59.6 63.3 100.0
Valid
Total
98 94.2 100.0
Missing System
6 5.8
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
19 34.5 38.0 38.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
31 56.4 62.0 100.0
Total
50 90.9 100.0
Missing System
5 9.1
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
17 17.0 18.7 18.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
74 74.0 81.3 100.0
Valid
Total 91 91.0 100.0
Missing System 9 9.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
8] How do you rate the overall quality of blinds/drapes/shades in place on windows in your
classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
2 13.3 13.3 13.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
13 86.7 86.7 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
6 10.0 11.1 11.1
- 47 -
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
48 80.0 88.9 100.0
Total
54 90.0 100.0
Missing System
6 10.0
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
5 45.5 55.6 55.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 36.4 44.4 100.0
Total
9 81.8 100.0
Missing System 2 18.2
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
20 39.2 44.4 44.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
25 49.0 55.6 100.0
Valid
Total
45 88.2 100.0
Missing System
6 11.8
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
35 55.6 59.3 59.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
24 38.1 40.7 100.0
Valid
Total
59 93.7 100.0
Missing System
4 6.3
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
28 26.9 27.7 27.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
73 70.2 72.3 100.0
Valid
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 25.0 100.0 100.0
Missing System
3 75.0
Library
Total
4 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
19 34.5 61.3 61.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
12 21.8 38.7 100.0
Total
31 56.4 100.0
Missing System 24 43.6
- 48 -
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
10 10.0 11.5 11.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
77 77.0 88.5 100.0
Valid
Total
87 87.0 100.0
Missing System
13 13.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total
100 100.0
9] How do you rate the overall quality of chalkboards, whiteboards, and associated materials [chalk,
dry erase markers, erasers] in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 6.7 6.7 6.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
14 93.3 93.3 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
14 23.3 23.3 23.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
46 76.7 76.7 100.0
Valid
Total
60 100.0 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
4 36.4 40.0 40.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
6 54.5 60.0 100.0
Total 10 90.9 100.0
Missing System
1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
29 56.9 64.4 64.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
16 31.4 35.6 100.0
Valid
Total 45 88.2 100.0
Missing System
6 11.8
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
12 19.0 19.4 19.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
50 79.4 80.6 100.0
Valid
Total
62 98.4 100.0
Missing System
1 1.6
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Jaynes Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
37 35.6 36.6 36.6
- 49 -
Rating
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
64 61.5 63.4 100.0
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
27 49.1 55.1 55.1
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
22 40.0 44.9 100.0
Total
49 89.1 100.0
Missing System
6 10.9
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
15 15.0 16.5 16.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
76 76.0 83.5 100.0
Valid
Total 91 91.0 100.0
Missing System
9 9.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
10] How do you rate the overall quality and availability of media equipment in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 6.7 6.7 6.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
14 93.3 93.3 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
13 21.7 22.4 22.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
45 75.0 77.6 100.0
Valid
Total
58 96.7 100.0
Missing System
2 3.3
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
4 36.4 40.0 40.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
6 54.5 60.0 100.0
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
- 50 -
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
17 33.3 39.5 39.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
26 51.0 60.5 100.0
Valid
Total
43 84.3 100.0
Missing System
8 15.7
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
19 30.2 32.2 32.2
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
40 63.5 67.8 100.0
Valid
Total
59 93.7 100.0
Missing System
4 6.3
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
44 42.3 44.4 44.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
55 52.9 55.6 100.0
Valid
Total
99 95.2 100.0
Missing System
5 4.8
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
24 43.6 52.2 52.2
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
22 40.0 47.8 100.0
Total
46 83.6 100.0
Missing System
9 16.4
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
24 24.0 27.6 27.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
63 63.0 72.4 100.0
Valid
Total 87 87.0 100.0
Missing System 13 13.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
11] How do you rate the overall quality of technology [if appropriate] in your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
2 13.3 13.3 13.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
13 86.7 86.7 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
- 51 -
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
16 26.7 29.6 29.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
38 63.3 70.4 100.0
Valid
Total
54 90.0 100.0
Missing System
6 10.0
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
6 54.5 66.7 66.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
3 27.3 33.3 100.0
Total
9 81.8 100.0
Missing System 2 18.2
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
19 37.3 51.4 51.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
18 35.3 48.6 100.0
Valid
Total
37 72.5 100.0
Missing System
14 27.5
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
8 12.7 14.5 14.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
47 74.6 85.5 100.0
Valid
Total
55 87.3 100.0
Missing System
8 12.7
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
48 46.2 52.2 52.2
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
44 42.3 47.8 100.0
Valid
Total
92 88.5 100.0
Missing System
12 11.5
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
22 40.0 56.4 56.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
17 30.9 43.6 100.0
Total
39 70.9 100.0
Missing System
16 29.1
Total
55 100.0
- 52 -
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
24 24.0 28.6 28.6
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
60 60.0 71.4 100.0
Valid
Total 84 84.0 100.0
Missing System 16 16.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
12] How do you rate the overall cleanliness of your classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 6.7 6.7 6.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
14 93.3 93.3 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
5 8.3 8.9 8.9
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
51 85.0 91.1 100.0
Valid
Total
56 93.3 100.0
Missing System
4 6.7
Total
60 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
6 54.5 60.0 60.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 36.4 40.0 100.0
Total
10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
11 21.6 23.9 23.9
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
35 68.6 76.1 100.0
Valid
Total
46 90.2 100.0
Missing System
5 9.8
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 14.3 14.5 14.5
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
53 84.1 85.5 100.0
Valid
Total
62 98.4 100.0
Missing System
1 1.6
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Jaynes Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
23 22.1 22.8 22.8
- 53 -
Rating
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
78 75.0 77.2 100.0
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
16 29.1 31.4 31.4
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
35 63.6 68.6 100.0
Total
51 92.7 100.0
Missing System
4 7.3
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
3 3.0 3.3 3.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
88 88.0 96.7 100.0
Valid
Total 91 91.0 100.0
Missing System 9 9.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
13] How do you rate the overall number of and convenience to electrical outlets in your
classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
3 20.0 20.0 20.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
12 80.0 80.0 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 15.0 15.0 15.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
51 85.0 85.0 100.0
Valid
Total
60 100.0 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
3 27.3 30.0 30.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
7 63.6 70.0 100.0
Total 10 90.9 100.0
Missing System
1 9.1
Total 11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
10 19.6 24.4 24.4
Hardway Hall Valid
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
31 60.8 75.6 100.0
- 54 -
Total 41 80.4 100.0
Missing System
10 19.6
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
20 31.7 32.8 32.8
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
41 65.1 67.2 100.0
Valid
Total
61 96.8 100.0
Missing System
2 3.2
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
22 21.2 22.0 22.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
78 75.0 78.0 100.0
Valid
Total
100 96.2 100.0
Missing System
4 3.8
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
26 47.3 52.0 52.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
24 43.6 48.0 100.0
Total
50 90.9 100.0
Missing System
5 9.1
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
12 12.0 13.3 13.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
78 78.0 86.7 100.0
Valid
Total 90 90.0 100.0
Missing System
10 10.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Total 100 100.0
14] How do you rate the overall quality of the physical teaching and learning environment in your
classroom(s)?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
1 6.7 6.7 6.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
14 93.3 93.3 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total
15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Very Poor or Poor
Rating
10 16.7 16.7 16.7
Valid
Satisfactory through
50 83.3 83.3 100.0
- 55 -
Excellent Rating
Total
60 100.0 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 81.8 90.0 90.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
1 9.1 10.0 100.0
Total 10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total
11 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
18 35.3 39.1 39.1
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
28 54.9 60.9 100.0
Valid
Total 46 90.2 100.0
Missing System
5 9.8
Hardway Hall
Total
51 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
13 20.6 21.3 21.3
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
48 76.2 78.7 100.0
Valid
Total
61 96.8 100.0
Missing System
2 3.2
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
26 25.0 25.7 25.7
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
75 72.1 74.3 100.0
Valid
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
Library Valid Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
4 100.0 100.0 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Very Poor or Poor
Rating
29 52.7 58.0 58.0
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
21 38.2 42.0 100.0
Total
50 90.9 100.0
Missing System
5 9.1
Total
55 100.0
Very Poor or Poor
Rating
9 9.0 9.9 9.9
Satisfactory through
Excellent Rating
82 82.0 90.1 100.0
Other / Not Main
Campus
Valid
Total 91 91.0 100.0
- 56 -
Missing System
9 9.0
Total 100 100.0
15] Does your classroom(s) provide access to more or less technology than you
need for effective instruction?
Building Code Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Access to LESS
technology than
required
2 13.3 13.3 13.3
The appropriate
amount of
technology
13 86.7 86.7 100.0
Colebank Hall Valid
Total 15 100.0 100.0
Education Bldg Valid Access to LESS
technology than
required
28 46.7 46.7 46.7
The appropriate
amount of
technology
31 51.7 51.7 98.3
Access to MORE
technology than
required
1 1.7 1.7 100.0
Total
60 100.0 100.0
Falcon Center Valid Access to LESS
technology than
required
1 100.0 100.0 100.0
Feaster Center Valid Access to LESS
technology than
required
5 45.5 50.0 50.0
The appropriate
amount of
technology
5 45.5 50.0 100.0
Total 10 90.9 100.0
Missing System 1 9.1
Total
11 100.0
Hardway Hall Valid Access to LESS
technology than
required
22 43.1 48.9 48.9
The appropriate
amount of
technology
21 41.2 46.7 95.6
Access to MORE
technology than
required
2 3.9 4.4 100.0
Total 45 88.2 100.0
Missing System 6 11.8
Total
51 100.0
- 57 -
Access to LESS
technology than
required
14 22.2 22.6 22.6
The appropriate
amount of
technology
44 69.8 71.0 93.5
Access to MORE
technology than
required
4 6.3 6.5 100.0
Valid
Total
62 98.4 100.0
Missing System
1 1.6
Hunt Haught Hall
Total
63 100.0
Access to LESS
technology than
required
48 46.2 47.5 47.5
The appropriate
amount of
technology
46 44.2 45.5 93.1
Access to MORE
technology than
required
7 6.7 6.9 100.0
Valid
Total
101 97.1 100.0
Missing System
3 2.9
Jaynes Hall
Total
104 100.0
The appropriate
amount of
technology
1 25.0 33.3 33.3
Access to MORE
technology than
required
2 50.0 66.7 100.0
Valid
Total
3 75.0 100.0
Missing System
1 25.0
Library
Total
4 100.0
Wallman Hall Valid Access to LESS
technology than
required
26 47.3 49.1 49.1
The appropriate
amount of
technology
23 41.8 43.4 92.5
Access to MORE
technology than
required
4 7.3 7.5 100.0
Total
53 96.4 100.0
Missing System
2 3.6
Total
55 100.0
Access to LESS
technology than
required
22 22.0 23.9 23.9
Other / Not Main
Campus
Valid
The appropriate
amount of
technology
53 53.0 57.6 81.5
- 58 -
Access to MORE
technology than
required
17 17.0 18.5 100.0
Total
92 92.0 100.0
Missing System
8 8.0
Total
100 100.0
- 59 -
Item Descriptive Statistics Group by Room Type Code
N [Rooms] Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
Computing Laboratory
57 3.89 .880 .117
Large Lecture Hall
18 3.83 1.249 .294
Science Laboratory
37 3.68 .973 .160
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 3.50 .786 .185
Smart Classroom
15 4.07 .884 .228
Typical Lecture Room
295 3.58 1.094 .064
1] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
lighting levels in your
classroom(s)?
Total
440 3.65 1.052 .050
Computing Laboratory
58 3.69 .959 .126
Large Lecture Hall
17 3.94 1.345 .326
Science Laboratory
37 3.51 1.044 .172
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 3.33 1.283 .302
Smart Classroom
15 3.67 .816 .211
Typical Lecture Room
295 3.53 1.039 .061
2] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
acoustics in your
classroom(s)?
Total
440 3.56 1.046 .050
Computing Laboratory
58 2.86 1.034 .136
Large Lecture Hall
17 3.53 1.179 .286
Science Laboratory
35 2.74 .980 .166
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 2.67 .840 .198
Smart Classroom
15 3.73 .884 .228
Typical Lecture Room
295 2.87 1.075 .063
3] How do you rate the
overall heating, cooling,
and ventilation comfort
levels in your
classroom(s)?
Total
438 2.90 1.067 .051
Computing Laboratory
58 3.50 1.030 .135
Large Lecture Hall
17 3.47 1.231 .298
Science Laboratory
36 3.00 1.171 .195
Seminar/Conference
Room
17 2.71 .772 .187
Smart Classroom
15 3.60 1.056 .273
Typical Lecture Room
278 3.35 1.060 .064
4] How do you rate the
overall accessibility to
your classroom(s) for
ADA-compliance?
Total
421 3.33 1.072 .052
Computing Laboratory
57 3.47 .984 .130
Large Lecture Hall
17 3.47 1.231 .298
Science Laboratory
36 3.14 .990 .165
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 2.78 1.003 .236
Smart Classroom
15 3.80 .862 .223
Typical Lecture Room
292 2.91 1.166 .068
5] How do you rate the
overall dampening of
external noise levels to
your classroom(s)?
Total
435 3.05 1.141 .055
- 60 -
Computing Laboratory
58 3.52 .978 .128
Large Lecture Hall
18 4.06 .802 .189
Science Laboratory
36 3.42 1.180 .197
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 3.67 1.085 .256
Smart Classroom
15 3.27 1.335 .345
Typical Lecture Room
292 3.41 1.003 .059
6] How do you rate the
overall amount of seating
available in your
classroom(s)?
Total
437 3.46 1.028 .049
Computing Laboratory
58 3.14 .847 .111
Large Lecture Hall
17 3.24 1.091 .265
Science Laboratory
36 3.00 1.242 .207
Seminar/Conference
Room
17 3.41 1.176 .285
Smart Classroom
15 2.93 .961 .248
Typical Lecture Room
291 3.01 1.086 .064
7] How do you rate the
overall type/style
[including flexible sizing]
and arrangement of
seating available in your
classroom(s)?
Total
434 3.05 1.069 .051
Computing Laboratory
54 3.37 .875 .119
Large Lecture Hall
13 3.31 1.032 .286
Science Laboratory
35 2.66 1.413 .239
Seminar/Conference
Room
15 2.33 1.047 .270
Smart Classroom
11 3.73 .786 .237
Typical Lecture Room
275 2.85 1.179 .071
8] How do you rate the
overall quality of
blinds/drapes/shades in
place on windows in your
classroom(s)?
Total
403 2.92 1.172 .058
Computing Laboratory
58 3.31 1.188 .156
Large Lecture Hall
18 2.89 1.231 .290
Science Laboratory
37 3.08 1.115 .183
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 2.50 .857 .202
Smart Classroom
15 3.33 .900 .232
Typical Lecture Room
292 2.93 1.118 .065
9] How do you rate the
overall quality of
chalkboards, whiteboards,
and associated materials
[chalk, dry erase markers,
erasers] in your
classroom(s)?
Total
438 2.99 1.124 .054
Computing Laboratory
57 3.88 .946 .125
Large Lecture Hall
17 3.29 1.404 .340
Science Laboratory
34 2.94 1.229 .211
10] How do you rate the
overall quality and
availability of media
equipment in your
classroom(s)?
Seminar/Conference
Room
14 2.36 .929 .248
- 61 -
Smart Classroom
15 3.33 1.345 .347
Typical Lecture Room
285 2.85 1.144 .068
Total
422 3.02 1.193 .058
Computing Laboratory
57 3.61 1.098 .145
Large Lecture Hall
12 3.33 1.435 .414
Science Laboratory
29 3.48 1.153 .214
Seminar/Conference
Room
14 2.50 1.019 .272
Smart Classroom
15 3.20 1.424 .368
Typical Lecture Room
263 2.81 1.209 .075
11] How do you rate the
overall quality of
technology [if appropriate]
in your classroom(s)?
Total
390 2.99 1.238 .063
Computing Laboratory
57 3.56 1.086 .144
Large Lecture Hall
18 3.89 .963 .227
Science Laboratory
35 3.31 1.132 .191
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 2.94 .873 .206
Smart Classroom
14 4.14 .949 .254
Typical Lecture Room
295 3.28 1.062 .062
12] How do you rate the
overall cleanliness of your
classroom(s)?
Total
437 3.36 1.074 .051
Computing Laboratory
58 3.50 .884 .116
Large Lecture Hall
18 3.67 1.085 .256
Science Laboratory
36 3.25 1.052 .175
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 2.83 .707 .167
Smart Classroom
15 3.87 .990 .256
Typical Lecture Room
287 3.02 1.039 .061
13] How do you rate the
overall number of and
convenience to electrical
outlets in your
classroom(s)?
Total
432 3.16 1.034 .050
Computing Laboratory
58 3.50 .978 .128
Large Lecture Hall
18 3.50 .924 .218
Science Laboratory
36 3.14 1.099 .183
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 3.28 1.127 .266
Smart Classroom
15 3.20 1.014 .262
Typical Lecture Room
294 3.06 1.019 .059
14] How do you rate the
overall quality of the
physical teaching and
learning environment in
your classroom(s)?
Total
439 3.15 1.029 .049
Computing Laboratory
58 2.02 .477 .063
Large Lecture Hall
18 1.83 .707 .167
Science Laboratory
37 1.59 .551 .091
Seminar/Conference
Room
18 1.61 .502 .118
Smart Classroom
14 1.64 .745 .199
Typical Lecture Room
297 1.66 .623 .036
15] Does your
classroom(s) provide
access to more or less
technology than you need
for effective instruction?
Total
442 1.70 .614 .029
- 62 -
Appendix B: Comments
In response to question number 6, the classrooms have a sufficient number of chairs but there
are so many chairs there is not sufficient room for faculty to walk around to help students or for
students to move chairs and work together on collaborative activities.
The white board in room 203 was cleaned with something that makes it very difficult to erase
the board now. The instructor computer is room 208 is so slow, it is worthless. Lastly, PLEASE
CLEAN THE WINDOWS IN JAYNES HALL. You cannot see out of them because they are
covered in dirt and mud from all of the construction!
Access to the Internet is crucial to instruction in visual art. The Internet is most effective when
examples become part of the dialogue of daily instruction. Often computer labs and multimedia
rooms are unavailable when students need to see examples. The problem may be solved by
providing carts with equipment, however -- we must deal with skylights and few outlets.
Additionally, there is no blackboard space in room 401 -- the drawing studio -- and display
space is extremely limited for the number of students who have classes in that room. Very little
storage exists in any of the studios, which greatly limits the size of projects that can be
accomplished. There are other issues of ventilation of classrooms, terribly irregular heating,
and either blocked or inaccessible fire escapes in some of the studios. Finally -- the fire alarm is
not loud enough to be heard in the center area of the fourth floor of Wallman Hall. Students
frequently think that it is a saw running and ignore it.
I teach hands on instruction classes.....court activity..hand ball, tennis, golf, etc.
I hate whiteboards...... what ever is wrong with plain old chalk boards???
# 16 to some extent if you cannot plan certain activities that depend on technology or perhaps
the location and height of the chalkboard.
This classroom is currently located adjacent to the ballroom. It is difficult to administer tests,
conduct lectures and evaluate student presentations with music blasting next door. However, I
understand that we are in temporary housing and have become acceptable to our current
conditions. We have three computers in the classroom and use the computer labs down the
hall if we need the use of technology. Not really a problem. Thanks
Multi media podiums with a laptop computer installed are very badly needed. The heating and
cooling system is unreliable.
This needs to be a SMART classroom as soon as possible.
At Pruntytown there is no access to Powerpoint or DVD player. Room is poorly lighted and
acoustics are terrible.
At the beginning of the survey, the Information Systems department was omitted, so I checked
Computer Science, Math... for the department within the School of Business. Classroom
seating layout is the major deficiency in both of my classrooms.
My students are still questioning what the lab fee they are forced to pay each semester is being
used for. I am unable to answer this question even after teaching at Fairmont for 12 years.
The 4th classroom in the survey is in hanger B which was never finished. No walls, no
ceiling,no multi-media, inadequate lighting. etc
The Computers are inadequate. They work too slowly and do not have the appropriate
software.
WH 321 is a temporary arrangement until the new building is done.
The projector systems installed in the rooms is less than adequate they must be going to the
lowest bidder without consideration for projection quality. The colors projected are poor at best.
Also turnaround time on broken equipment is very bad. the projector in room 302 HHH has
been gone for the majority of the semester.
Room 304 works well as a classroom (aside from the pillars that are in the middle of the room
and the fact that every time it rains the greenhouse windows leak and it rains in our classroom
on the chalkboard trays and the lack of heat and air control). Room 101 is retrofitted for a
computer lab and has some issues. The computers are slow and sometimes don't work. There
is no place for materials if one is using the Proxima. The room is hot and has gas smells that
- 63 -
no one seems to be able to get rid of.
I physically moved my class from Jaynes Hall 310 to 321-B Turley Center because of the need
for a computer lab.
The smart classroom would be very nice if it worked consistently. Lectures are often late
getting started because of technical difficulties. This causes frustration for both faculty and
students and decreased learning for the students. In addition, technical difficulties often disrupt
the class once started and inhibit the flow of information. Problems are constantly reported to
the appropriate persons, and though patch jobs are done quickly, the basic problem remains.
Our nursing laboratory space is inadequate for the number of students that we now have, and
the nursing technology utilized in the lab is outdated. Because of limited classroom space and
the need to transmit classes, our labs are often used for lecture. There is not enough seating in
our labs to accommodate lecture. Also, the technology needed for a well rounded learning
experience is difficult to place in the lab.
Both classrooms function very well. Room 320 could use more technology equipment.
Particularly need seminar rooms for use by upper division (4000 and graduate level courses).
HH 001 is basically a utilities room used as the FSU pottery studio. The room in that function
is capable of handling 10 students while class sizes are as high as 20. General Access to the
building is poor with no direct access to or from Hunt Haught Hall. The room does not meet
any ADA standards and does not meet OSHA or NIOSH requirements for ventilation and
materials storage. Lighting is poor. The studio is not served by the custodial staff so
Faculty and students regularly clean the facility take out the garbage and shovel the snow.
The Feaster Center is a disaster for teaching. While trying to conduct a class, dance instruction
with loud music was playing and people were lifting weights in another room. No windows and
poor ventilation.
Chalkboards cannot be erased adequately. Room 208 only has a VCR which should be
replaced by a combination DVD/VCR.
Thanks for creating such an easy, user-friendly survey! If there could be a good supply of
chalk and dry erase markers, that would be wonderful.
My role at FS is not faculty, but advisor. The advising conditions in the Advising Office are
substandard at best. There is absolutely no privacy for students as we discuss their grades
and other personal matters. The room is frequently polluted with exhaust from parked, running
trucks and smoke from smokers standing on the sidewalk. There is no barrier to sound from
the outside and from the inside, which makes it difficult for me to hear and to be heard by
people at my desk or on the phone. I would compare the situation to running beef through the
stock yards. Students cannot feel that we are giving them the personal attention that we should
be giving them. The only reason that the student could feel good about the advising process is
that the advisors are excellent and care about the students.
The student exit evaluations have identified that the quality of the media in these two rooms
have been detrimental to their learning.
While the institution's emphasis on the availability of technology is understandable, some of us
still do things 'the old fashioned way'. I would appreciate the availability of a large lecture
space in Wallman Hall that did not have tiered seating. This would facilitate breaking up large
classes for small group work. I also much prefer chalkboards to the dry erase boards that were
installed in Wallman Hall without consulting the faculty as to our preference.
Our situation within our veterinary technology program is in desperate need of facilities. Our
hands are tied behind our backs and this keeps us limited on growth and expansion of the
program. If we had proper facilities we could triple our enrollment. We are up for an
accreditation site visit in March of 2007 and we are Very Concerned about our facilities. Some
of the ceilings are water damaged. The outlets in room 103 are not working properly. The
space is entirely to small for the type of program that we have. The USDA changes the
formulas on the space sizes required constantly for the animals which could become a major
problem at any time. I feel if we don't upgrade our current facilities or receive a new building we
may loose our accreditation. The field of veterinary technology is growing rapidly and with the
proper facility we could grow rapidly.
- 64 -
Overall, the classrooms are adequate to conduct learning.
Probably the major problem with most of classrooms in the Hardway Building is the lack of
appropriate air conditioning. This is particularly problematic on the top floor rooms during the
afternoon (and when the class contains a large number of students). In addition, I have had
students complain of their allergies and asthma acting-up when they spend time in certain
rooms in this building.
It would be nice to have access to the remote controllers for the DVD players. I had no problem
in Hardway Hall, but for the classrooms on the 3rd floor of Jaynes was a different story. I was
told that they didn't know what went with what and the batteries were probably dead.
For a school of education, I think the classrooms need to model state of the art classrooms.
The quality of those green chalkboards are terrible as are the boards in Jaynes Hall. There is
no access to chalk, erasers or dry erase markers. The classrooms in the education building
need to model elementary classrooms - whiteboards, bulletin boards, supplies, manipulatives -
etc. I teach developmental math in Jaynes hall and those that have the old black or green
boards are terrible to use. One classroom does have a white grid and whiteboards but they
need those holders for dry erase markers and erasers. Individual student response boards like
Communicators would be great to have in the school of education to model formative
assessment as well as teach with.
The walls of our building shed a layer of cement dust and white paint all over our musical
instruments constantly. We have had water damage to instruments from water dripping from
ceilings. Our studios and classrooms have no windows. The temperature control in the
building is fluctuating so much such that the instruments are under constant duress and the
pianos cannot stay in tune. I teach in a piano studio where I can hear clarinet and sax lessons
next door and trumpet lessons on the opposite wall clear as day, plus the large ensemble room
down the hall blaring whatever they are blaring coming straight through the door. One
classroom I teach in has wires all over the floor because there are no facilities provided to
cover them. One classroom I teach in has no computer or technological equipment of any kind.
That classroom has multiple expensive musical instruments that are in cabinets which have
locks and doors that are broken. We have put in numerous maintenance requests to get them
fixed and they have gone unanswered. One of those instruments was stolen this semester, but
we have no other place to store them more securely. I have fifteen students in a technology
class next semester and only one complete workstation for them to do their assignments on,
with no printer in that room. Our ensemble room where we have recitals is directly below the
theater shop, so we will have buzz-saws during choir rehearsals, banging during our recitals,
etc. Our large ensembles have no designated appropriate acoustical space to perform on
campus. Colebank gymnasium and Wallman Hall Theater are acoustical nightmares and we
do not always have access to those spaces to perform in.
Other than WH321, we have no media equipment and chalkboards are unusable. It is a real
hindrance to teaching.
The Feaster Center classrooms do not have adequate dividers to keep the noise levels at a
minimum.
This location certainly is an improvement over room 310 Hardway Hall.
This info may be useless because Graphics will move into new space when the Technology
addition is complete.
Rooms need DVD players
The administration in HHH is making great strides in correcting any of the technology issues in
the building. The cleaning of the building is sometimes not sufficient. HHH 105 need to be
renovated to make it more flexible as a classroom/lab. Right now it can only be used as a lab
which means the space is sometimes under-utilized.
As you might have noticed, all of the classes listed are in the same classroom.
for some questions the appropriate answer should have been --- does not apply (e.g. coverings
on windows. Lighting question should include: not appropriate for using data projector
The classrooms are in a terrible shape. Some of the electrical outlets are broken and present
- 65 -
physical danger. Computers are very slow. Computer desks are broken and tilted in some
classrooms. There is proper window curtains/screens in the classrooms to block light when
necessary. Windows do not provide adequate noise insulation. Floors have patchwork vinyl
carpets that look terrible. Computer wires are not properly tacked.
In both rooms, lights that are connected to the dimmer switch buzz loud enough to be really
annoying. If one turns off those lights, then the overall lighting set up is wrong for use of the
overhead projector. (The wrong lights are on for optimal viewing.) In 308, placement of the
screen is not right. With the tables in there, the overhead cannot be positioned far enough
away from the screen and the angle of the screen makes it next to impossible to make the
viewing area from the projector be rectangular and large enough for the students to see. Also
the light switches are behind the screen which must be lifted to flip the switches.
My method of instruction would be influenced possibly by the room in which I taught if it was not
of modern quality like the Education Bldg. I hope my answers were useful – Thanks
The dry-erase board doesn't erase easily, no matter what brand of dry-erase marker is used.
Also, there are many cords to many things plugged into an outlet on the left side of the board
and one must step over them to access the board.
While I thoroughly enjoy working at Fairmont State, I must say that the room in which I lecture
(104 HHH) has the exact same poster in it that was hanging there when I took geology there in
1990. There is even an article posted, quite coincidentally, that I brought to my geology
teacher in 1993. Maybe we need some updates? :)
Since classes generally start out with a large enrollment and then shrink considerably by mid-
semester it would be helpful to me and to my students if we could move from MMA or a larger
lecture hall at the mid-term to a more intimate classroom size. The large classroom is not
conducive to small group work which I would like to be able to do on a more regular basis.
For teaching composition, I would prefer that I be assigned to a classroom with desk computers
for each student. This is not necessary for literature classes.
The chalkboards in room 116 are problematic. This is not enough room for the desks we have.
Room 114 dry erase board is not good. The room is too long to have the 60 or so desks it has.
I don't like white boards.
The chalkboards in several classrooms in Jaynes Hall are in very bad condition. As a math
teacher this has significant impact on my instruction!!!
Without multimedia availabilities it is difficult for the students to get a feel for what is being
taught. In this day and age it is essential for visual media to be available. If we look at the
students they are asked to do computer programs and power point presentations for a variety
of classroom assignments. We need to have access to the equipment.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to make use of small group experiences in the Jaynes Hall rooms
that I use due to the large number of chairs and students. I can't move them around
sufficiently. The lecture/discussion approach is typically better suited for these rooms. I have
also just noticed a leak in room 322 Educ. coming from the ceiling near the window. Two of my
students got wet with the last rain. I'm a person who has to be very concerned with mold
accumulation. P.S. THANKS FOR CARING ENOUGH TO ASK FOR THIS INFORMATION!
HAPPY HOLIDAYS.
Sometimes the seating is too close. This encourages cheating.
In room 149 at the Caperton Center, I take advantage of the Smart Technology that is
available. At times however, the students in the back have some difficulty seeing the
presentation. This is my first semester working with Smart Technology, and although I can
adjust to using it, at times I would just prefer a simple blackboard. I do enjoy and use widely
the video capabilities and the internet projection features in both classrooms, although it does
take some class time to set it all up.
Lighting in classroom, although satisfactory can be improved. It can be a little dark at times.
Heating/Air conditioning can be regulated better in all the classroom at the aviation center.
Some classrooms are too cold (104) and others are too warm.
Difficult to get technical support for proper configuration of computers in the classroom.
- 66 -
Rooms 105 and 114 ED is listed as dedicated lab/studio, but is often used as a multi-purpose
classroom
Periodic painting of the rooms and repair of the walls would be helpful. Cleaning of the
windows, too.
In 311HHH, the light switches are behind the overhead screen and a wall mounted periodic
table. The electrical outlet for the overhead is on a wall and students have to walk over the
cord. The floor outlet no longer works--I suppose. Students have complained about this room
being too cold all semester -- especially with the air conditioning. One set of lights buzz and
cannot be used. Hence the lighting can not be adapted correctly for overhead use. It is either
dim or too bright. In 305 HHH, there are too many chairs for the shape and size classroom.
Hence, we put 35-40 students in a classroom that is too small. It is difficult to walk around the
class to answer questions. Sometimes the room is too cold. It is hard to see the overhead due
to lighting. The lights above the screen cannot be turned out easily as I do in the other
classrooms -- light switch in the back of the room. The overhead screen is in front of the
window. Other rooms this shape (such as 309 HHH) have the screen and chalkboards in a
different set up. This is the first time I have taught in this classroom and the locations of the
chalkboards and overhead is very poor. Also in 308 HHH, there is a large box containing a
white board that has not been installed for over a year. It makes the room feel very cramped.
I am very pleased with the facilities at the Caperton Center. It is very modern and up-to-date
and an enjoyable place to teach because the accessibility of the teaching technologies
available allows me to present material in a way that can reach as many different learning
styles as possible. Nice job.
Most Hardway classrooms need setups for Powerpoint and other types of presentations. Only
a couple of rooms have mounted projectors/computers. Many internet connections don't work
in the room, either.
Lighting in both rooms is adequate but harsh. Both rooms are usually either too hot or too cold.
Room 201 is a fairly large room, suitable for use as a private teaching studio and office, but it
contains a pipe organ, a harpsichord and two large storage cabinets. These items use up so
much space that the remainder is just enough for a desk and two chairs. The main problem is
that there is nowhere else to put any of these items. Room 206 has a great many desks and
a grand piano. These are in the way of the armless chairs and music stands I need to use for
my class. Again the root problem is an inadequate number of rooms dedicated to music
teaching/performance. Room 206 is noisy, badly ventilated and has no covering of any
description over the only 'window', a square opening in the outside wall. The available
technology is somewhat irrelevant because of the performance oriented nature of the classes I
teach.
I teach all three of my classes in the same room. The mounted projector in the classroom didn't
work for videos that I use to teach one of the classes. It was most inconvenient and a waste of
class time trying to deal with the issue. Kim put a mobile VCR/TV in the class room which was
fine but, when it works, the mounted projector is much better. Otherwise, I think the classroom
is exactly what is needed for my classes.
I'm not in room 304 this term, but it seems to rain into the room a lot. Most class rooms (not
labs) in HHH need the lights replaced to make effective use of multimedia. AND they could all
use new ceiling tiles.
The classrooms at the Caperton Center are great because they are technology based and each
room is equipped with a computer. Perfect for presentations, but the ED building is not as
technological sound.
We could use DVD players in each classroom and more equipment for doing power point
presentations in the classroom.
In ED 102, we need a DVD player. Heating and cooling in ED 102 is very uneven. There are
drafts in the room depending on where the students are seated. ED 102 room environment
greatly improved with addition of area rug and podium this fall.
The Feaster Center as a whole is very old and outdated. The classrooms are separated by a
folding wall that is broken and not able to isolate classroom noise. The Feaster Center is not
- 67 -
Handicap accessible. There is no way a wheel chair can make it to the third floor where the
professor offices are located. There is little room for storage and classroom growth.
I transfer scheduled classes at the Vo-Tech center to the high school in order to have access to
a computer lab in my classroom.
My class room is in the Turley Center 321a
Since I teach mostly computer type classes, neither the Taylor County Vo-Tech nor the Barbour
County Vo-Tech have overhead projection units which connect with a computer for showing the
class how to use the various software packages. This is a hindrance to helping students see
how to use the software features. Additionally, since this type of equipment is not new
technology and is available at both the Caperton and main campuses, the students are not
getting the quality of instruction that is available elsewhere.
The class room in which I am teaching has tables at which three students sit. There is not
place for extra books for outer ware. When a test is given there is no way to keep students
from looking at each others test because they are on top of each other. I must make up two
different tests. I guess I just do not like the elbow to elbow class rooms.
In general, I do not have any issues with the classrooms in which I teach. The Education 322
classroom is fine, but the desks are spread out across the room so far that I feel like the
students on the 'outskirts' miss out. At times, there are tissues or coffee cups left behind by
the instructor who uses the room before me. Other than that, I have no other comments.
I teach in a library media center with a connecting computer lab. This is my day time
employment environment. It is a more than adequate facility, with the exception of heating and
cooling. Both are turned of at 3:00 in the afternoon, so by the evening class it is either very
cold or very warm. Does not make for a good learning environment.
All of the classrooms I teach in HHH have difficult to read old style chalkboards. Students
sitting 3 or more tables back complain that can not read the boards. In room 402 the dust from
the chalkboard rains down on the rooms dedicated laptop. To have such low tech low quality
classroom materials reflects poorly on the College of Science and Technology.
Type of room was not on your list. The department was not on your list. The classroom does
not have windows. Many points do not fit the questions.
I teach a Chemistry class in this room. The board space is very inadequate for a math/science-
type class.
The computers in 117 JH and 214 Jaynes Hall are obsolete and need replaced immediately. It
takes an eternity just to get logged in, let alone try to use an application.
Hopefully, the new building will solve all of the current issues.
Both of these classrooms are in Turley Center. This was not an option of choices
The chairs/desks in the classrooms are not large enough or comfortable for the adult learners
occupying them.
You need an answer that says NA, because there where quit a few responses that I gave, that I
really should not have commented on.
I put ' poor' for ADA requirements for the room I was in at Caperton, only for the fact that I have
to step up onto the podium. A person in a wheelchair could not do that.
My primary problem with the classroom seating is that there are way too many desks in both
rooms than seems safe or convenient and larger students are simply miserable--only one
alternatively styled desk is available in either. I love the natural light afforded by the big
windows (and wouldn't trade them for quiet), but if there is so much as leaf blower running
outside (or snow blower), students and I must scream at each other to be heard--perhaps this
is more a matter of grounds-keeping than classroom improvement. Most urgently, 304 needs a
thermostat that works--the heartiest students have shivered and perspired through their classes
all term. Finally, a college classroom ought to reflect the importance and dignity of pursuing
higher ed -- it needn't be fancy, but it ought to be clean, orderly, and comfortable. Currently,
rooms in Jaynes tend to look like broken office furniture storage facilities, which just makes me
sad.
Time to get Whiteboards--The last two institutions I taught at in Pennsylvania had these five
- 68 -
years ago.
I have often had to change my course because technology was not available.
Thank you for your help. Except for the heating/cooling system (designed by a New Orleans
engineer), our Caperton Center is an excellent facility with a wonderful staff.
The thermostat in JH 304 is locked and thus sometimes the room is too hot or too cold. The
chalkboards are fine but recently purchased erasers don't erase! JH 303 is often used for
meetings and sometimes food containers (pizza boxes and the like) are left 'in the trash' but the
trash can is too small to dispose of these items.
You did not include Bryant Place. Class 3 and 4 on my survey are from Bryant Place. I do not
have enough white board space there, no computer, no PENCIL SHARPENER, etc. The
furnace/air conditioner is in the corner of the room and it makes much too much noise. It is
ALWAYS running. Can it ever be turned off? The rooms are clean, bright, and spacious, but
equipment is needed. I carry my own markers, etc to use on the boards.
I have had two personal VCR tapes destroyed by the machine in Jaynes 304; another one
belonging to the Library was 'eaten' last spring. This is unacceptable. Although Language &
Literature has ordered replacement copies for my personal tapes, these replacements will not
belong to me. I've therefore lost money using the equipment in this classroom.
The distance technology is always a problem. We lose instructional time in almost every class
because the technology is either not working at one or the other rooms. The room is too small
for the number of students crowded into the room.
Hunt Haught Hall is not the most comfortable building to teach or learn in. Its poor design,
unattractive environment, inconsistent and fluctuating temperatures, in conjunction with a scary
elevator, ugly leaking ceiling tiles and general poor air quality make it kind of a depressing
place to be.
Room's number 3 and 4 are not technically on your list. Number three is the lab kitchen at the
Education Building, number two is the main kitchen in the Falcon Center, as I use it for
internships and practicum students.
There are a number of comments that I have regarding classrooms that your survey did not
address: 1. Lighting a. Many rooms in HHH have at least one bank of lights which are
contain a rheostat. This is a problem because they are NOISY and they BLINK incessantly--
almost to the point of being a strobe light. They should be removed and be replaced by a
regular on/off switch. b. Switches are not located in a convenient place in the classrooms.
Sometimes at the back of the room or underneath a view-screen--and nowhere near the door
so that I can turn them on or off as I enter/leave the room. 2. Many of the ceiling tiles are
discolored or missing due to water damage. Which leads us to... 3. Many classrooms and
offices get water damage from leaks--the most noticeable are 304 and 306, rooms which are
plagued by water from or near the greenhouse on the 4th floor. 4. The smells that come
through the ventilation system are sometimes of a nasty variety...The intake for the ventilation
system is in close proximity to some of the exhaust for science labs. 5. The rooms are not
heated/cooled in a balanced manner. Room 308 is almost always too cool and then 311 is
almost always 10 degrees warmer that 308. 6. Windows-- a. Drapes are either 30+
years old and so nasty that they should be thrown away--or they've been taken down and
thrown away. b. Almost every window in the building has extremely large gaps in them that
allow wind and rain and snow in and our precious heat/cold out.
Generally 211 JH has adequate technology, but we had Proxima issues which were not
addressed this semester. These should be corrected next semester. Lighting in that room is
an issue on a cloudy (or very bright) day.
The light switch in 311 HHH is behind the periodic table. The room is often too hot. 608
Bryant Place could use another whiteboard. 208 Jaynes is too hot and very cluttered with
technology.
There were a few class sessions, which were cut short due the high temp. in the room.
classroom lighting should be checked
The rooms are unattractive. The ceiling tiles in 312 and 314 are in poor condition. There are
- 69 -
no windows. The seats are much to small for large students.
Room 103 Jaynes Hall is an absolute disgrace. I am so afraid some student is going to fall
over all of the wires, computers and other junk that clutters the room.
Jaynes Hall obviously is in need of repair. All classrooms should have proximas. 303 does not.
Many of the computers are password protected or are not well maintained. Rooms have old
chalkboards. I use a portable whiteboard that is a little unsteady but can be wheeled into my
room. For small classes, it is not a big issue but it would be helpful to see good whiteboards
installed in the classrooms.
1. I have heard some complaints by other faculty of odors in HHH. I notice these odors only
when I'm outside and occasionally in the greenhouse when the windows are open. 2. Proxima
projector in 302 HHH has been non-functioning or missing for half of the semester. 3. The
interior of HHH could use a fresh coat of paint. 4. Glass in the greenhouse needs to be re-
glazed or replaced. If it rains, it also rains inside the greenhouse. 5. Unreliable/inefficient
heating and cooling in the greenhouse prevents greater utilization. 6. Tar from the thresholds
at the greenhouse doors is oozing and being tracked through the area. 7. In the classroom, I
use any and all technology available. 8. I'm not sure if the safety lighting in the 4th floor labs is
working properly.
A white board would have been nice to have to teach with.
Room 113 Education Building is a temporary environment for our WV Folklife Center activities.
Obviously, it is crowded, but we are going to be able to move into our new center area within a
year. Room 310 Jaynes Hall like all of the rooms on the 3rd. Floor of Jaynes Hall are old, with
broken blinds, broken seats, and too many chairs for the individual room environments. The
chalk boards are older and worn too. The windows are usually dirty.
The technology in the Hardway building/lower level is dreadful. I don't even have a decent
overhead projector to work with. Student leaning is always compromised since I have to write
everything on the chalk board (I am happy to have it as opposed to a white board.) White
boards are sloppy tools and the markers are never available.
Both of the classrooms hinder cooperative learning groups and demonstration of appropriate
techniques for active learning. Since I teach elementary teaching methods, it is very difficult to
model appropriately with the lack of available technology in the rooms, and with regards to the
issues of flexible seating. Too many desks are in both rooms which makes access up and
down aisles and around the perimeter of the room impossible.
103 Needs an overhead lightpro attached to the ceiling to alleviate some of the cords strung
across the floor. The computer stand has a broken wheel and is propped up by a book.
Technology is less than adequate in Wallman Hall. It is extremely difficult to plan for student's
presentations/speeches and have ports inactive, dead plugs etc.
no, but I am a big fan of a conference-style structure. long tables instead of old-fashioned
children's desks. space between the tables allowing the instructor to move freely throughout the
room (high touch plus keeping students alert & oriented). 214-dry erase markers always
missing or out of ink-odor problem; not as good as chalk boards to me. 117-a cart on three
wheels all semester. we almost sent a computer crashing-literally-down trying to move. old
buildings-big windows-lots of light-huge positive to us light-deprived West Virginians (lived in El
Paso before moving here). also, cage-lock Proximas and hard drives to computers. provide a
simple combination lock to access computer cabinet. WVU does this-it is simple and appears to
work well. keep carts for computers and overheads functional-basic
maintenance/housekeeping checks-not hard. computer in 214, i think, is old. couldn't bring up
web-ct to show students how to upload file. couldn't play a CD for instructional purposes.
basic things like the wobbly cart or slow computer impede the flow of instruction.
the only issue that i have with the classrooms in which i have taught is that the rooms could be
more ada-compliant. perhaps automatic door openers and more appropriate seating for
individuals who use a wheelchair. otherwise great classrooms. maintenence and cleaning
operations are superb. .
My Class is Ballroom dancing and the hall is good the availability of musical equipment is
limited
70
Appendix C: The Survey Instrument
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Design Survey
To change the look of your survey, select a choice
below. Click 'Add' to create your own custom theme.
Theme:
Classroom Environment Survey
Office of Institutional Research
The Office of Institutional Research would like to like to request your assistance on a survey relating to classroom
environments. My name is Bill Finley, the Director of Institutional Research at FSU, and although I haven't met all of you
personally, I would like you to help me with this initiative.
Directions:
Pursuant to the FSU Strategic Plan, Goal #1 [Empower Faculty and Students to achieve high levels of teaching and
learning], the Office of Institutional Research would like to know about your experiences teaching in the assigned
classroom(s) during the Fall 2006 semester. Your survey responses will be completely anonymous but may be aggregated
by school/college for research purposes only.
This survey should take about 5-10 minutes of your time, so please take a few minutes to complete this form.
Remember to click on the "Done" button at the end to record your responses for analysis.
* Choose your FSU/PC&TC
School/College:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (1 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
Show All Pages and Questions
Purple Passion
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
Your department [if
applicable]:
* Your employment
status:
Items with Matrix
Response
Each of the items in this survey allows for you to rate a maximum of four classrooms that you have used during this
current fall semester. While I realize that many of you teach in more than 4 classrooms, for survey purposes, please
focus only on four rooms. You may or may not use all four rows of the response matrix depending upon the number of
different classrooms that you select to rate. So, please think about each item and how you would rate each of the
classrooms you have chosen, and then check only box per classroom row indicating your rating for that classroom for that
item.
Location: Indicate
the location of
your classrooms
[note: classroom
number is
optional for non-
Fairmont Campus
locations]
Campus Building Code
Room
Number
[left
most
digit]
Room
Number
[middle
digit]
Room
Number
[right
most
digit] Room Type
Your Classroom # 1 for the survey
Your Classroom # 2 for the survey
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (2 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
Your Classroom # 3 for the survey
Your Classroom # 4 for the survey
1] How do you
rate the overall
quality of the
lighting levels in
your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
2] How do you
rate the overall
quality of the
acoustics in your
classroom(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (3 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
3] How do you
rate the overall
heating, cooling,
and ventilation
comfort levels in
your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
4] How do you
rate the overall
accessibility to
your classroom(s)
for ADA-
compliance?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (4 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
5] How do you
rate the overall
dampening of
external noise
levels to your
classroom(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
6] How do you
rate the overall
amount of seating
available in your
classroom(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
7] How do you
rate the overall
type/style
[including flexible
sizing] and
arrangement of
seating available
in your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (5 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
8] How do you
rate the overall
quality of blinds/
drapes/shades in
place on windows
in your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
9] How do you
rate the overall
quality of
chalkboards,
whiteboards, and
associated
materials [chalk,
dry erase
markers, erasers]
in your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (6 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
10] How do you
rate the overall
quality and
availability of
media equipment
in your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
11] How do you
rate the overall
quality of
technology [if
appropriate] in
your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (7 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
12] How do you
rate the overall
cleanliness of
your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
13] How do you
rate the overall
number of and
convenience to
electrical outlets
in your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (8 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
14] How do you
rate the overall
quality of the
physical teaching
and learning
environment in
your classroom
(s)?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very Poor
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
15] Does your
classroom(s)
provide access to
more or less
technology than
you need for
effective
instruction?
Access to MORE technology than required The appropriate amount Access to LESS technology than required
Your Classroom #1
Your Classroom #2
Your Classroom #3
Your Classroom #4
Almost Finished!
The last two items:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (9 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
SurveyMonkey.com - Powerful tool for creating web surveys. Online survey software made easy!
16] Is your method of
instruction generally
influenced by the type of
room in which you teach?
Yes No
17] Any other
comments:
Thank you!
Thank you for your time and effort on this initiative. Your responses on this survey provide a very valuable service in
establishing baselines for a variety of measures about classroom environments at Fairmont State University.
Thank you again, and have a great day!
Please click "Done" to record/include your responses for analysis.
SurveyMonkey is Hiring! | Privacy Statement | Contact Us | Logout
Copyright ©1999-2006 SurveyMonkey.com. All Rights Reserved.
No portion of this site may be copied without the express written consent of SurveyMonkey.com.
http://www.surveymonkey.com/SurveySummary.asp?SID=2906472&Rnd=0.9223752 (10 of 10)1/10/2007 3:18:09 PM
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

Classroom Environment Survey Fall2006 (Pierpont Community and Technical College)

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 4 February 2021

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document