independent of any physical, emotional, or mental consequences.
26/
Also, neither of these hurdles
apply to claims for injunctive relief.
Any prisoner considering a federal civil rights lawsuit should do further research to
determine whether there is a good argument that federal rights have been violated and that
monetary damages can be awarded. The following resources may be helpful:
C An annotated edition of Title 42, section 1983 of the United States Code.
Thousands of cases decided on prisoners rights are listed in the annotations to the
civil rights statute. (Note that cases decided in the past may have been overturned;
thus, a prisoner should check every case to try to determine if it is still good law.)
C Rights of Prisoners, Fourth Edition (2009 plus updates) by Michael Mushlin,
published by Thompson Reuters.
C. PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO FILE A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUIT
Before filing a federal civil rights lawsuit, a prisoner must “exhaust available
administrative remedies.”
27/
This means that a CDCR prisoner who wants to bring a federal civil
rights suit must file (or at least attempt to file) an administrative appeal such as a Form 602, 602-
HC, or 1824, or BPH 1074 (depending on the type of issue) through the Director’s or Third Level
of Review.
28/
A prisoner must do this even though money damages is not a remedy that can be
obtained through the CDCR administrative appeal process, and regardless of whether the issues
involve on-going circumstances of prison life or a particular episode of abuse.
29/
26. See, e.g., Canell v. Lightner (9th Cir. 1998) 143 F.3d 1342, 1346 (First Amendment
claim).
27. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).
28. If a grievance is fully granted at one of the lower levels, the full extent of relief under the
administrative system has already been achieved. Thus, the prisoner is not obligated to pursue
the appeal through the Third Level in order to exhaust administrative remedies. Brady v.
Attygala (9th Cir. 2002) 196 F. Supp.2d 1016; Gomez v. Winslow (N.D. Cal. 2001) 177
F.Supp.2d 977, 984-985. More complicated scenarios arise when a prisoner receives partial
relief at the first or second level of review; if at all in doubt about whether further relief could be
obtained, the prisoner should continue filing the administrative appeals or file additional appeals
covering all of the issues. See Brown v. Valoff (9th Cir. 2005) 422 F.3d 926 (in two cases decided
jointly, court reached different conclusions on whether prisoner exhausted available remedies).
29. Booth v. Churner (2001) 253 U.S. 731 [121 S.Ct. 1819; 149 L.Ed.2d 958; Porter v.
Nussle (2002) 534 U.S. 516; 122 S.Ct. 983; 152 L.Ed.2d 12]. However, the exhaustion of
administrative remedies requirement applies only to prisoners, so a person who is released from
prison prior to filing a civil rights complaint need not exhaust administrative remedies before
filing a federal civil rights suit about injuries suffered while in prison. Talamantes v. Leyva (9th
Cir. 2009) 575 F.3d 1021, 1024.
9