Community College Survey
of Student Engagement
SOWELA Technical Community College
2018 Key Findings
Table of Contents
Key Findings: A Starting Point 2
Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice 3
Aspects of Highest Student Engagement 4
Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement 5
2018 CCSSE Special-Focus Items 6
CCFSSE 8
1
Key Findings: A Starting Point
The Key Findings report provides an entry point for reviewing results from your administration of the
2018 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). The report provides college-specific
data in an easy-to-share format including benchmark comparisons between the college, top-performing
colleges, and the CCSSE cohort. It also highlights aspects of highest and lowest student engagement at
the college, as well as results from five CCSSE special-focus items. Select faculty survey data are also
highlighted.
Colleges participating in CCSSE 2018 received a survey instrument that was refreshed starting with the
2017 administration. Most of the items on the survey did not change at all, and the majority of those
items that were revised underwent only minor adjustments to wording or response categories. Items
that were no longer providing relevant data (e.g., outdated technology items) were eliminated, and the
updated instrument includes several high-impact practices items that were not previously on the core
survey. The refreshed survey also includes items about library and active military/veteran services, as
well as new demographic items about active military/veteran and college athlete status.
This year, reporting is based on a two-year cohort; 2019 reporting will use the standard three-year cohort of
participating colleges in survey analyses.
Academic Mindset
In each annual administration, the Center for Community College Student Engagement (the Center) has
included special-focus items on CCSSE to allow participating colleges and national researchers to delve
more deeply into student experiences and areas of institutional performance of greatest interest to the
field. Five items designed to elicit information about academic mindset among community college
students were added to the 2018 CCSSE administration. The results of these findings are on pages 6–7 of
this report.
Benchmark Overview by Enrollment Status
Figure 1 below represents your institution's CCSSE benchmark scores by student enrollment status.
Figure 1
Part-Time Students Full-Time Students
49.2
50.2
49.9
56.0
48.4
53.9
48.7
55.0
54.3
56.9
Benchmark Scores
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Active and Collaborative
Learning
Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty
Interaction
Support for
Learners
2
Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice
The CCSSE benchmarks are groups of conceptually
related survey items that address key areas of
student engagement. The five benchmarks denote
areas that educational research has shown to be
important to students’ college experiences and
educational outcomes. Therefore, they provide
colleges with a useful starting point for looking at
institutional results and allow colleges to gauge and
monitor their performance in areas that are central
to their work. In addition, participating colleges
have the opportunity to make appropriate and
useful comparisons between their performance and
that of groups of other colleges.
Performing as well as the national average or a
peer-group average may be a reasonable initial
aspiration, but it is important to recognize that these
averages are sometimes unacceptably low. Aspiring to
match and then exceed high-performance targets is the
stronger strategy.
Community colleges can differ dramatically on such
factors as size, location, resources, enrollment
patterns, and student characteristics. It is important to
take these differences into account when interpreting
benchmark scores—especially when making
institutional comparisons. The Center has adopted the
policy “ResponsibleUses of Center Data,” available at
www.cccse.org.
The current two-year cohort for the refreshed CCSSE
is referred to as the 2018 CCSSE Cohort (2017–2018)
throughout all reports.
CCSSE Benchmarks
Active and Collaborative Learning
Students learn more when they are actively involved in their
education and have opportunities to think about and apply
what they are learning in different settings. Through
collaborating with others to solve problems or master
challenging content, students develop valuable skills that
prepare them to deal with real-life situations and problems.
Student Effort
Students’ own behaviors contribute significantly to their
learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their
educational goals.
Academic Challenge
Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student
learning and collegiate quality. These survey items address
the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the
complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the
rigor of examinations used to evaluate student performance.
Student-Faculty Interaction
In general, the more contact students have with their
teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to
persist toward achievement of their educational goals.
Through such interactions, faculty members become role
models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong
learning.
Support for Learners
Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges
that provide important support services, cultivate positive
relationships among groups on campus, and demonstrate
commitment to their success.
For further information about CCSSE benchmarks, please visit
www.cccse.org .
Figure 2
*Top-Performing colleges are those that scored in the top 10 percent of the cohort by benchmark.
SOWELA Technical Community College 2018 CCSSE Cohort 2018 Top-Performing Colleges*
49.8
50.0
59.6
53.4
50.0
59.7
51.5
50.0
57.0
52.3
50.0
60.1
55.8
50.0
60.8
Benchmark Scores
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Active and Collaborative
Learning
Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty
Interaction
Support for
Learners
Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 25 across all respondents. For further
information about how benchmarks are computed, please visit www.cccse.org .
3
Aspects of Highest Student Engagement
Benchmark scores provide a manageable starting point for reviewing and understanding CCSSE data. One way to
dig more deeply into the benchmark scores is to analyze those items that contribute to the overall benchmark
score. This section features the five items across all benchmarks (excluding those for which means are not
calculated) on which the college scored highest and the five items on which the college scored lowest relative to
the 2018 CCSSE Cohort.
The items highlighted on pages 4 and 5 reflect the largest differences in mean scores between the institution and
the 2018 CCSSE Cohort. While examining these data, keep in mind that the selected items may not be those that
are most closely aligned with the college’s goals; thus, it is important to review all institutional reports on the
CCSSE online reporting system at www.cccse.org.
Figure 3 displays the aggregated frequencies for the items on which the college performed most favorably relative
to the 2018 CCSSE Cohort. For instance, 12.3% of SOWELA Technical Community College students, compared
with 8.7% of other students in the cohort, responded often or very often on item 4h. It is important to note that
some colleges’ highest mean scores might be lower than the cohort mean.
Figure 3
12.3%
8.7%
39.4%
30.3%
51.7%
37.7%
24.3%
16.2%
40.1%
32.1%
Aggregated Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4h
Often or
Very often
9d
Quite a bit or
Very much
9e
Quite a bit or
Very much
12.1e
5 or more times
12.1h
5 or more times
Table 1
Benchmark
Item
Number Item
Support For Learners 9d Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)
Support For Learners 9e Providing the support you need to thrive socially
Student Effort 12.1e Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)
Student Effort 12.1h Frequency: Computer lab
Notes:
For Item(s) 4 (except 4e), often and very often responses are combined.
For Item(s) 9, quite a bit and very much responses are combined.
4
SOWELA Technical Community College 2018 CCSSE Cohort
Active and Collaborative Learning 4h Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary)
Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement
Figure 4 displays the aggregated frequencies for the items on which the college performed least favorably relative
to the 2018 CCSSE Cohort. For instance, 19.2% of SOWELA Technical Community College students, compared
with 34.7% of other students in the cohort, responded often or very often on item 4b. It is important to note that
some colleges’ lowest mean scores might be higher than the cohort mean.
Figure 4
SOWELA Technical Community College 2018 CCSSE Cohort
19.2%
34.7%
58.1%
66.7%
56.2%
62.6%
47.8%
57.7%
7.4%
11.0%
Aggregated Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4b
Often or
Very often
4d
Often or
Very often
4n
Often or
Very often
6c
5 or more
12.1d
5 or more times
Table 2
Benchmark
Item
Number Item
Student Effort 4d Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information
from various sources
Student-Faculty Interaction 4n Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your
performance
Academic Challenge 6c Number of written papers or reports of any length
Student Effort 12.1d Frequency: Peer or other tutoring
Notes:
For Item(s) 4 (except 4e), often and very often responses are combined.
For Item(s) 6, 5–10, 11–20, and more than 20 responses are combined.
5
Active and Collaborative Learning 4b Made a class presentation
'
2018 CCSSE Special-Focus Items
The Center adds special-focus items to CCSSE each year to augment the core survey, helping participating
colleges and the field at large to further explore fundamental areas of student engagement. The 2018
special-focus items elicit new information around the topic of academic mindset, such as whether students feel
welcome and respected at the college, whether they believe they can learn all of the material being presented in
their courses, and whether they feel like they can change their intelligence by working hard on their studies.
Frequency results from the first five special-focus items for your college and the 2018 CCSSE Academic
Mindset item-set respondents are displayed across pages 6 and 7.
Figure 5: I feel welcome and respected at this college.
SOWELA Technical Community College (N=358)
Academic Mindset Respondents (N=127,702)
68.4%
57.1%
23.7%
32.2%
6.0%
8.6%
1.4% 1.4%
0.5% 0.6%
Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Strongly Agree Agree I neither agree
nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
SOWELA Technical Community College (N=358)
Academic Mindset Respondents (N=127,612)
60.3%
43.1%
29.8%
38.5%
8.1%
14.1%
1.4%
3.0%
0.4%
1.3%
Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Strongly Agree Agree I neither agree
nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Figure 6: This college is preparing me for what I plan to do in life.
6
Figure 7: I can learn all of the material being presented in my courses this academic term.
SOWELA Technical Community College (N=358)
Academic Mindset Respondents (N=127,498)
53.5%
41.5%
32.5%
42.0%
9.0%
11.8%
4.5%
3.8%
0.5%
0.9%
Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Strongly Agree Agree I neither agree
nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Figure 8: I have good relationships with others at this college.
SOWELA Technical Community College (N=358)
Academic Mindset Respondents (N=127,524)
54.2%
43.1%
32.3%
37.8%
11.2%
15.7%
1.8%
2.5%
0.4%
0.9%
Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Strongly Agree Agree I neither agree
nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Figure 9: I can become more intelligent by working hard on my studies.
SOWELA Technical Community College (N=357)
Academic Mindset Respondents (N=127,448)
68.7%
60.1%
24.0%
31.1%
4.6%
6.9%
1.6%
1.2% 1.1%
0.7%
Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Strongly Agree Agree I neither agree
nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
7
CCFSSE
The Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE), designed as a companion survey to
CCSSE, elicits information from faculty about their perceptions regarding students’ educational experiences, their
teaching practices, and the ways they spend their professional time—both in and out of the classroom.
Forty percent of all CCFSSE respondents reported teaching in a part-time capacity, while 60% reported teaching
full-time. Below are frequency results for your college's part- and full-time faculty based on their responses to
special-focus items on the topic of academic mindset, such as whether they think the students in their selected
course sections can learn all of the material being presented and whether they think their students can change their
basic intelligence.
Figure 10: Do you think the students in your selected course section can learn all the material being presented?
Part-Time (N=10)
Full-Time (N=27)
40.0%
29.6%
30.0%
66.7%
30.0%
3.7%
0.0% 0.0%
Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All of them can Most of them can Some of them can None of them can
Part-Time (N=10)
Full-Time (N=26)
50.0%
30.8%
30.0%
42.3%
10.0%
7.7%
10.0%
19.2%
Percentage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All of them can Most of them can Some of them can None of them can
Figure 11: Do you think the students in your selected course section can change their basic intelligence?
8