The I.G. argues that you were convicted of a misdemeanor criminal offense. Do
you agree that you were convicted of a misdemeanor criminal offense?
If you disagree, explain why you disagree. State which exhibits support your
argument and explain why they do.
II. Were you convicted of an offense for which exclusion is authorized?
Do you disagree with the I.G.’s argument that he is authorized to exclude you
because your conviction is of a misdemeanor relating to the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, prescription or dispensing of a controlled substance?
If you disagree, explain why you disagree. State which exhibits support your
argument and explain why they do.
III. Is the length of your exclusion unreasonable? The I.G. argues that the
length of the exclusion that he determined to impose is reasonable.
Do you believe that a mitigating factor or factors exist(s) that support(s)
reducing the length of your exclusion (before answering this question read the
list of potentially mitigating factors that is set forth at 42 C.F.R. § 1001.401(c)
(3))?
If you believe that a mitigating factor or factors exist(s), state what it is/they are
and explain why the presence of the factor or factors should support reducing the
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes