If you disagree, explain why you disagree. State which exhibits support your
argument and explain why they do.
II. Were you convicted of an offense for which exclusion is authorized?
The I.G. argues that your exclusion is authorized, because you were convicted of
one of the following offenses:
A. A misdemeanor occurring after August 21, 1996, relating to fraud,
theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial
misconduct –
(i) in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service, or
(ii) with respect to any act or omission in a health care program,
other than Medicare or a State health care program (a State Medicaid
program), operated by, or financed in whole or in part by, any
federal, State, or local government agency; or
B. A criminal offense relating to fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of
fiduciary responsibility, or other financial misconduct with respect to any
act or omission in a program (other than a health care program) operated
by, or financed in whole or in part by, any federal, State, or local
government agency.
Do you disagree with the I.G.’s argument?
No
Yes