Fillable fresno state Staff Employee Performance Evaluation Rating

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank fresno state Staff Employee Performance Evaluation Rating Form

Use Fill to complete blank online CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

fresno state Staff Employee Performance Evaluation Rating

On average this form takes 26 minutes to complete

The fresno state Staff Employee Performance Evaluation Rating form is 3 pages long and contains:

  • 3 signatures
  • 0 check-boxes
  • 92 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

U.S.A. forms for California State University, Fresno

BROWSE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
Sta
ff Employee Performance Evaluation
Evaluation form applicable for staff employees represented by UAPD (Unit 1);
CSUEU (Units 2, 5, 7, 9); SETC (Unit 6); SUPA (Unit 8); and Confidential (C99) Employees
Date: Name: Empl ID:
Original Hire Date:
This evaluation is for the time period from: to
Classification Title:
Department/Division/College:
Probationary
As outlined below for each
respective unit
Permanent Employee
Annual
Temporary Employee
Each appointment/minimum one per year
Other
UAPD
CSUEU
SETC
SUPA
3rd Month
6th Month
6th Month
9th Month
11th Month
12th Month
Were tasks and responsibilities described by the position’s job description reviewed by both the employee and evaluator? Yes No
Is this job description current? Yes
No If no, please update and forward to Human Resources with this performance ev
aluation.
PERFORMANCE REVIEW REPORT
Please check box in appropriate column.
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Requires
Improvement*
Comments
Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Not
Applicable
1. Job Knowledge
Demonstrates the knowledge and skills
necessary to perform the essential
functions of the job description.
2. Quality of Work
Demonstrates accuracy, thoroughness
and efficiency; understands goals and
completes assignments within reasonable
timeframes.
Rating Definitions
Exceeds Expectations
Performance exceeds expectations due to exceptional quality of work performed in all essential areas of responsibility resulting in an overall quality
of work that is excellent, and/or includes the completion of a major goal/project, and/or makes an exceptional or unique contribution in support of
unit, department, or University objectives. Meets annual goals or exceeds expectations.
Meets Expectations (Satisfactory):
Performance consistently
meets expectations in all essential areas of responsibility and the quality of work is satisfactory overall. The most critical
annual goals are met.
Requires Improvement:
Performance does not consistently meet expectations. Performance fails to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of responsibility, and/or
one or more of the most critical goals are not met. Overall quality of work needs improvement. Performance is consistently below expectations in
most essential areas of responsibility, and/or reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in any
important areas. A professional development plan may be necessary to improve performance.
Frequency of evaluations shall
be sufficient to make timely
recommendation prior to the
end of the probationary period
11th Month
6th Month
Rev. Date 9/17
3. Problem-Solving
Demonstrates analytical and problem-
solving skills; recognizes, diagnoses, and
resolves routine problems independently;
considers policies, procedures, and long
term ramifications of decisions.
4. Organizational Skills
Demonstrates ability to plan, organize and
coordinate job duties in a manner that
efficiently and effectively achieves desired
work goals/objectives.
5. Teamwork
Demonstrates ability to foster a
supportive work environment by
establishing and maintaining effective
working relationships within a diverse
population.
6. Flexibility and Adaptability
Demonstrates ability to handle changing
demands and uncertainty; can respond
quickly to problems; receptive to learn
new techniques and procedures.
7. Interpersonal Skills
(Customer service, Communication,
Integrity and Trust, Professionalism)
Easily understood by others; able to
communicate clearly; demonstrates active
listening skills; demonstrates integrity and
professionalism; is trustworthy;
demonstrates tact and courtesy in
discussions with others.
8. Attendance
Consider the employee’s work attendance
and punctuality. Observe the number of
unexcused absences or excessive
absenteeism and/or patterned absences.
Also consider when tardiness is held to a
minimum and is with good cause.
9. Safety
Adherence to and support of federal,
state and university safety standards and
practices. Follows work safety procedures
when operating equipment, machinery,
and/or vehicles. Properly inspects
equipment, machinery, and/or vehicles
before use. Proactive in dealing with
safety conditions or situations.
10. Supervision of Others
Promotes a positive work environment;
regularly communicates with employees,
delegates tasks and motivates/leads
others to achieve or exceed unit goals.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Requires
Improvement*
*Please explain how employee is not meeting expectations
with specific example(s) in Evaluator Comments Box.
Manager’s Comments Regarding Performance Review:
Manager’s Statement (Future Performance Objectives, Plans and Goals):
Manager’s Name/Title (Please print) Manager’s Signature Date
Manager: By signing this form you are certifying your status as an MPP Administrator or their designee.
Date evaluation draft given to employee for review: __________________ Manager’s Initials ____________ Employee Initials ____________
Date Manager discussed evaluation with employee: __________________ Manager’s Initials ____________ Employee Initials ____________
For CSUEU represented employees: Time elapsed between these two dates should not exceed ten (10) business days (CSUEU Article 10.9).
All other units: Time elapsed between dates should not exceed five (5) business days.
Appropriate Administrator’s Comments (May be Director/Department Head or Dean/Division Head; Provost/Vice President):
Administrator Name/Title (Please print) Administrator Signature Date
Employee Comments (Attach additional sheets as necessary):
Employee Signature
Employee: This signature indicates neither agreement nor disagreement with this evaluation, but it does indicate that you have read the evaluation and it has been
discussed with you. Please return original form to your immediate supervisor for submission to Human Resources
.
Rev. Date 09/17
Date
Employee Signature
click to sign
signature
click to edit
click to sign
signature
click to edit
click to sign
signature
click to edit
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

fresno state Staff Employee Performance Evaluation Rating

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 21 April 2020

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document