Student Name
Course
Overall Grade Scale: Outstanding: 100-96%, Excellent: 95-90%, Satisfactory: 89-75%, Unsatisfactory: <75%
Levels of Achievement
Outstanding
Excellent Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Not Acceptable
100 to 96 points
Fully answered all aspects of the
assignment. Demonstrated robust
critical thinking through a
comprehensive analysis that
integrated relevant perspectives into
an original, clear thesis fully
supported with consistent logic.
95 to 90 points
Answered all aspects of the
assignment. Demonstrated critical
thinking through a comprehensive
analysis that integrated relevant
perspectives into a clear thesis
supported with consistent logic.
89 to 75 points
Answered the assignment.
Demonstrated critical thinking
with sufficient analysis and
adequately stated thesis with
adequate support.
74 to 1 point
Failed to adequately address aspects of
the assignment. Analysis did not
demonstrate critical thinking, was unclear
and not adequately supported.
0 points
Inappropriate and/
or unprofessional
response. Did not
complete
assignment. Non-
original work.
100 to 96 points
Demonstrated exceptional and in-
depth mastery of course concepts.
Superb use of evidence, primarily
through course material/concepts and
augmented with relevant personal
experiences/external sources to
support positions.
95 to 90 points
Demonstrated mastery of course
concepts. Strong use of evidence,
primarily through course material/
concepts and augmented with relevant
personal experiences/external sources
to support positions.
89 to 75 points
Demonstrated understanding of
course concepts. Adequate use of
evidence, primarily through course
material, to support positions.
74 to 1 point
Did not demonstrate understanding of course
concepts. Inadequate use of course material
to support positions.
0 points
Inappropriate and/
or unprofessional
response. Did not
complete
assignment. Non-
original work
Analysis
points earned
Course Concepts &
Support
points earned
eSchool Essay Rubric (PME)
Instructor
Date
Grade
Points Percent
29 Jan 18
Criteria
Analysis
(100 points)
(Critical Thinking)
Course Concepts
& Support
(100 points)
(Content)
(Area)
(Points Possible)
page 1 of 2
0
0.00%
Levels of Achievement
50 to 48 points
Writing was exceptionally clear,
understandable and concise. Overall
paragraph and/or sentence
organization were exceptional. Writing
follows all appropriate style/format
guidance (e.g. Tongue and Quill, AU
Style Guide, Chicago Manual of Style).
Writing is free of digressions and/or
irrelevant information.
47 to 45 points
Writing was clear, understandable and
concise. Overall paragraph and/or
sentence organization were very good.
Writing contains minor deviations from
appropriate style/format guidance (e.g.
Tongue and Quill, AU Style Guide,
Chicago Manual of Style). Digressions
and/or irrelevant information does not
significantly detract from the
argument.
44 to 38 points
Writing was generally clear,
understandable and concise.
Overall paragraph and/or sentence
organization were generally
effective. Writing contains
multiple deviations from
appropriate style/format guidance
(e.g. Tongue and Quill, AU Style
Guide, Chicago Manual of Style).
Digressions and/or irrelevant
information detract reader from
the argument.
37 to 1 point
Writing was repeatedly unclear, difficult to
understand and/or wordy. Overall paragraph
and/or sentence organization were ineffective
or nonexistent. Writing contains significant
and/or substantial deviations from
appropriate style/format guidance (e.g.
Tongue and Quill, AU Style Guide, Chicago
Manual of Style). Digressions and/or
irrelevant information consistently detract
from the argument.
0 points
Inappropriate and/
or unprofessional
response. Did not
complete
assignment. Non-
original work.
50 to 48 points
Grammar and spelling were flawless.
47 to 45 points
No more than a few minor grammar
and/or spelling errors.
44 to 38 points
Grammar or spelling errors noted
that did not detract from
readability.
37 to 1 point
Repeated grammar or spelling errors
detracted from readability.
0 points
25 to 24 points
Complied with all assignment
parameters time limits, word limits,
citations, etc. Submitted assignment
IAW instructions.
23 points
Minor deviation(s) from assignment
parameters time limits, word limits,
citations, etc. Submitted assignment
IAW instructions.
22 to 19 points
Multiple deviation(s) from
assignment parameters -time
limits, word limits, citations, etc.
Submitted assignment IAW
instructions.
18 to 1 point
Significant deviation(s) from assignment
parameters - time limits, word limits,
citations, etc. Did not submit assignment
IAW instructions.
0 points
Inappropriate and/
or unprofessional
response. Did not
complete
assignment. Non-
original work.
Inappropriate and/
or unprofessional
response. Did not
complete
assignment. Non-
original work.
Outstanding Excellent Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Not Acceptable
Writing Style
(50 points)
(Communication)
Writing Mechanics
(Communication)
(50 points)
Administrative
(25 points)
Writing Style
points earned
Writing Mechanics
points earned
Administrative
points earned
Criteria
(Area)
(Points Possible)
(Admin)
29 Jan 18
page 2 of 2