Wills | © 2019 Themis Bar Review, LLC | 15
E. Special Issue 3: Revival
1. Republication
UPC (majority rule) does not recognize automatic revival of a revoked will.
Example 28: T-Bone Taylor executes a will giving his estate to his wife,
Charlene. Later, T-Bone executes a new will, which not only splits his estate
between Charlene and his best friend Hank Mardukas, but also expressly
revokes the first will. T-Bone and Hank have a falling out and T-Bone revokes
the second will. Revocation of the second will does NOT automatically revive
the first will. For the testamentary gift to Charlene to be admitted to probate, T-
Bone will need to ______________________________ the first will.
If T-Bone does not re-execute, he will die without a will, and his estate will be
distributed through the rules of ______________________________
succession.
Note 10: Full disclosure: This rule can get a little picky. Refer to the Wills outline
if you want the itty, bitty, picky details.
2. Dependent Relative Revocation (DRR)
o DRR provides a safety valve for testators who revoke a will on the basis of a
______________________________.
o The mistake can be grounded in law or in fact.
o DRR invalidates the mistaken revocation and revives the earlier revoked will.
Example 29: T-Bone Taylor executes a will giving his entire estate to his best
friend, Hank Mardukas. After T-Bone gets word that Hank has died, he executes
a new will giving his entire estate to his wife Charlene. If it turns out that Hank
is in fact alive and well, Hank can seek to have DRR applied to undo the
revocation of the first will, on the theory that the revocation of the first will was
conditioned on a mistake of fact (i.e., Hank’s death).
Example 30: T-Bone Taylor executes a will giving his entire estate to his best
friend, Hank Mardukas. T-Bone attempts to create a second will and writes on
the first will that “this will is revoked because I have made a new will, /s T-Bone
Taylor.” If it turns out that the second will is not valid, Hank can seek to have
DRR applied to undo the revocation of the first will, on the theory that the
revocation of the first will was conditioned on a mistake of law (i.e., valid
execution of the second will).
Exam Tip 10: If you see revocation based on a mistake, do a DRR analysis. Focus
on the idea that but for the mistake, the testator would not have revoked the
first will. Buzzwords: “revocation,” “mistake,” “causation,” and “safety valve.”