UPWARD EVALUATION
VP’S, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS, DIRECTORS, & SUPERVISORS
ADMINISTRATIVE STYLE AND EFFECTIVENESS
NAME & JOB TITLE OF EMLPOYEE BEING EVALUATED:
______________________________________________________
Date:__________________________
This evaluation form should be used by an employee’s direct supervisor to gather feedback regarding the
administrative style & effectiveness of the appropriate person named above prior to the employees annual
performance review. The administering supervisor will combine submitted data from this survey to be discussed
during an employee’s annual evaluation. The purpose is to improve feedback and to provide a basis for improving
administrative practices and personnel recommendations. You are requested to answer the questions on this form
as honestly and objectively as possible. You need not sign your name, since only group results will be compiled by
the employees’ immediate supervisor. Your participation will be most helpful if you identify both strengths and
weaknesses. Please circle a response below for each of the questions.
I. Attributes of the VP/Dean
For the attributes listed below, circle the number that best describes the employee being evaluated. Use "1" or "2" if
the first word or phrase is most descriptive; use "4 or "5" if the second word is most descriptive; use "3" if the
employee dis
plays both attributes equally. “CJ” indicates that you cannot judge this attribute.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Friendly (1 or 2) vs. Unfriendly (4 or 5)
Organized (1 or 2) vs. Disorganized (4 or 5)
Dedicated to institution (1 or 2) vs. Dedicated to self (4 or 5)
Flexible (l or 2) vs. Rigid (4 or 5)
Sensitive to others (1 or 2) vs. Insensitive to others (4 or 5)
Open to ideas (1 or 2) vs. Closed-minded (4 or 5)
Democratic (1 or 2) vs. Autocratic (4 or 5)
Motivating (1 or 2) vs. Discouraging (4 or 5)
Realistic (1 or 2) vs. Unrealistic (4 or 5)
