U.S. Department of Education
Certification and Agreement
for Funding under the
Education Stabilization Fund Program
Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief
Fund (ESSER Fund)
CFDA Number: 84.425D
OMB Number: 1810-0743
Expiration Date: 10/31/2020
Paperwork Burden Statement
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless
such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this information collection is 1810-
0743. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing
and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain benefit
under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of
the time estimate, suggestions for improving this individual collection, or if you have comments or concerns regarding
the status of your individual form, application or survey, please contact Christopher Tate, Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., S.W., Room 3E229, Washington, D.C. 20202
directly.
Use your "Mouse" or "Tab" key to move through the fields and check boxes. After completing last field, save document to hard drive to make future updates or click print button.
PROGRAM BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Purpose
Under the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER Fund), the
Department awards grants to State educational agencies (SEAs) for the purpose of providing local
educational agencies (LEAs), including charter schools that are LEAs, with emergency relief funds
to address the impact that Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had, and continues to
have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. LEAs must provide equitable services
to students and teachers in non-public schools as required under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES Act).
Eligibility
SEAs in any of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Timeline
The SEA will have one year, from the date of its ESSER award, to award funds. Any funds not
awarded by the SEA within one year of receiving its award will be returned to the Department to be
reallocated to other States consistent with the CARES Act.
Uses of Funds
SEAs:
The SEA must use no less than 90 percent of its allocation to make subgrants to LEAs, including
charter schools that are LEAs, based on each LEA’s share of funds received under part A of title I
of the ESEA in fiscal year 2019. With the funds not subgranted to LEAs, the SEA may reserve up
to an amount equal to ½ of 1 percent of the total allocation for administrative costs, and the
remaining funds may be used for emergency needs as determined by the SEA to address issues
responding to COVID-19. These emergency needs may be addressed through the use of grants or
contracts.
LEAs:
LEAs may use funds for any purposes listed in section 18003(d) of the CARES Act. (See Appendix
A.)
Program Contact
For additional information, please contact Christopher Tate by telephone at (202) 453-6047 or by
email at ESSERF@ed.gov.
ii
CERTIFICATION AND AGREEMENT INSTRUCTIONS
To receive an ESSER Fund allocation, SEAs must submit to the Department the following
information:
A completed cover sheet that includes the signature of the Chief State School Officer or
authorized representative. (Part A of the Certification and Agreement)
Programmatic, fiscal, and reporting assurances. (Part B of the Certification and Agreement)
Information on the uses of ESSER funds. (Part C of the Certification and Agreement)
Other assurances and certifications. (Part D of the Certification and Agreement)
For purposes of this document, the term “Certification and Agreement” is the application that an
SEA is required to file under section 18003(a) of Division B of the CARES Act.
Certification and Agreement Submission Information
An SEA must submit a Certification and Agreement to the Department no later than July 1, 2020.
Please submit your Certification and Agreement to the Department as follows:
Email an electronic version of the ESSER Fund Certification and Agreement in .PDF (Portable
Document Format) to ESSERF@ed.gov.
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Authorizing Statute
Appendix B – State Allocation Table
iii
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF
FUND (ESSER FUND)
STATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY
PART A: CERTIFICATION AND AGREEMENT COVER SHEET
State:
CFDA Number: 84.425D
Legal Name: DUNS Number:
Chief State School Officer: Mailing Address:
State Contact for Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund:
Position and Office:
Mailing Address:
Telephone:
Email address:
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all the information and data in this agreement are true and correct. I
acknowledge and agree that the failure to comply with all Assurances and Certifications in this Agreement, all
relevant provisions and requirements of the CARES Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136 (March 27, 2020), or any other
applicable law or regulation may result in liability under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq.; OMB
Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180,
as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485; and 18 USC § 1001, as
appropriate.
Chief State School Officer or Authorized Representative (Typed Name):
Telephone:
Signature of Chief State School Officer or Authorized Representative:
Date:
Form Approved OMB Number: 1810-0743 Expiration Date: 10/31/2020
Illinois State Board of Education
806812558
Carmen I. Ayala
100 N. First Street, Springfield, IL 62702
Krish Mohip
Deputy Officer - Instructional Education
100 North First Street
Springfield, IL. 62777-0001
312-793-2756
kmohip@isbe.net
217-782-2223
Dr. Carmen I. Ayala
05/11/2020
Carmen I. Ayala
Digitally signed by Carmen I. Ayala
Date: 2020.05.11 19:22:18 -05'00'
click to sign
signature
click to edit
PART B: PROGRAMMATIC, FISCAL, AND REPORTING ASSURANCES
The [Chief State School Officer or his/her authorized representative] assures the following:
1. The SEA will allocate no less than 90 percent of the grant funds under this program to local
educational agencies (LEAs) (including charter schools that are LEAs) in the State. Under the
ESSER Fund, the SEA will award grants by formula to State educational agencies (SEAs) for
the purpose of providing LEAs, including charter schools that are LEAs, with emergency relief
funds to address the impact that the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had, and
continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the Nation. This includes both
continuing to provide educational services, such as remote learning, while schools and
campuses are closed, and developing and implementing plans for the return to normal
operations. The SEA will allocate these funds to LEAs on the basis of their respective shares of
funds received under title I, part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 in
fiscal year 2019.
2. The SEA will use the remaining funds (hereafter SEA reserve) for emergency needs as
determined by the SEA to address issues related to COVID-19, which may be addressed through
the use of grants or contracts. From an SEA’s reserve, the SEA may use not more than 1/2 of 1
percent of the SEA’s total grant for administrative costs.
3. The SEA will ensure that LEAs use ESSER funds for activities allowable under section
18003(d) of Division B of the CARES Act. (See Appendix A.)
The Department generally does not consider the following to be an allowable use of ESSER
funds, under any part of 18003: 1) subsidizing or offsetting executive salaries and benefits of
individuals who are not employees of the SEA or LEAs or 2) expenditures related to state or
local teacher or faculty unions or associations.
4. The SEA will ensure that LEAs receiving ESSER funds will provide equitable services to
students and teachers in non-public schools as required under 18005 of Division B of the
CARES Act.
5. The SEA will ensure that an LEA receiving ESSER funds will provide equitable services to
students and teachers in non-public schools located within the LEA in the same manner as
provided under section 1117 of the ESEA, as determined through timely and meaningful
consultation with representatives of non-public schools.
The SEA will ensure that a public agency will maintain control of funds for the services
and assistance provided to a non-public school under the ESSER Fund.
The SEA will ensure that a public agency will have title to materials, equipment, and
property purchased with ESSER funds.
The SEA will ensure that services to a non-public school with ESSER funds will be
provided by a public agency directly, or through contract with, another public or private
entity.
6. The SEA will comply with the maintenance of effort provision in Section 18008(a) of Division
B of the CARES Act absent waiver by the Secretary pursuant to Section 18008(b) thereof.
7. The SEA and each LEA and any other entity that receives ESSER funds will, to the greatest
extent practicable, continue to compensate its employees and contractors during the period of
2
any disruptions or closures related to COVID-19 in compliance with Section 18006 of Division
B of the CARES Act. In addition, each entity that accepts funds will continue to pay employees
and contractors to the greatest extent practicable based on the unique financial circumstances of
the entity. CARES Act funds generally will not be used for bonuses, merit pay, or similar
expenditures, unless related to disruptions or closures resulting from COVID-19.
8. The SEA must assure that, when applicable, it will provide technical assistance to LEAs on the
use of ESSER funds for remote learning, which includes both distance education as defined in
section 103(7) of the HEA and distance learning as defined in ESEA section 8101(14), so that
students can continue learning during school closures.
9. The SEA will comply with all reporting requirements, including those in Section 15011(b)(2) of
Division B of the CARES Act, and submit required quarterly reports to the Secretary at such
time and in such manner and containing such information as the Secretary may subsequently
require. (See also 2 CFR 200.327-200.329). The Secretary may require additional reporting in
the future, which may include: the methodology LEAs will use to provide services or assistance
to students and staff in both public and non-public schools, the uses of funds by the LEAs or
other entities and demonstration of their compliance with Section 18003(d), such as any use of
funds addressing the digital divide, including securing access to home-based connectivity and
remote-use devices, related issues in supporting remote learning for all students, including
disadvantaged populations.
10. The SEA will submit to the Department, within 60 days of receiving ESSER funds, a report that
will include:
A budget for the SEA’s reserve that includes information about the up to 1/2 of 1 percent
of the SEA’s total grant for administrative costs and the uses of funds for emergency
needs to address issues related to COVID-19; and
An Internal Control and Subrecipient Monitoring Plan to ensure that funds are used for
allowable purposes in accordance with cash management principles.
11. The SEA will ensure that every recipient and subrecipient of ESSER funds will cooperate with
any examination of records with respect to such funds by making records available for
inspection, production, and examination, and authorized individuals available for interview and
examination, upon the request of (i) the Department and/or its Inspector General; or (ii) any
other federal agency, commission, or department in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction and
authority.
12. The SEA will return to the Secretary any funds received under the ESSER Fund that the SEA
does not award within 1 year of receiving such funds.
Chief State School Officer or Authorized Representative (Printed Name):
Signature:
Date:
3
05/11/2020
Carmen I. Ayala
Digitally signed by Carmen I. Ayala
Date: 2020.05.11 19:24:25 -05'00'
click to sign
signature
click to edit
PART C: USES OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL
EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS
Section 18003 of Division B of the CARES Act provides in relevant part that grants awarded under
the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund be used to support the ability of local
educational agencies (LEAs) to continue to provide educational services to their students. The
Department requests the following:
1. Information that the SEA may request LEAs to include in their subgrant applications to the
SEA. For example, an SEA might propose to include the following in developing its subgrant
application:
How the LEA will determine its most important educational needs as a result of COVID-
19.
The LEA’s proposed timeline for providing services and assistance to students and staff
in both public and non-public schools.
The extent to which the LEA intends to use ESSER funds to promote remote learning.
How the LEA intends to assess and address student learning gaps resulting from the
disruption in educational services.
The above considerations are in addition to the application information requirements from
sections 442 and 427 of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232e and
§ 1228a).
4
ISBE will release an electronic grant application for Illinois LEAs to help them meet the
pressing needs they face in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, within the
application, information is requested to both ensure compliance with the CARES Act as
well as provide LEAs substantial latitude in identifying and supporting local needs.
ISBE will review each grant application to ensure it is substantially approvable. In order
for a grant to be substantially approvable, the LEA must:
• Allocate costs in sufficient detail and be in compliance in its intent to meet grant
objectives.
• Ensure costs are reasonable, necessary and allocable to a valid
program/administrative need.
o Reasonable: A cost is agreeable in that it is a result of sound judgment, not
exceeding the limit prescribed by reason (not excessive), is moderate in price, and is
the outcome of a rational decision.
o Necessary: A cost is considered necessary to a federal program to the extent it
meets the identified needs of a school or community in light of the purposes of the
grant.
o Allocable: A cost is considered allocable to a federal program to the extent it benefits
the objectives of that program.
In addition to the requirements set forth in Sections 442 and 427 of GEPA, ISBE will
collect assurances that LEAs will comply with all applicable federal requirements (Sec.
15011).
More specifically, the LEA application requests information including, but not limited to,
identification of how proposed activities align with allowable expenses, a proposed
budget including expenditure code reporting, information on required non-public
consultation, and federal and state assurances.
Additionally, ISBE includes information in the application requesting that LEAs respond
to the following prompts as proposed by the U.S. Department of Education as well as
one additional prompt (# 4):
1. How the LEA will determine its most important educational needs as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
2. The LEA’s proposed timeline for providing services and assistance to students and
staff in both public and nonpublic schools.
3. The extent to which the LEA intends to use ESSER funds to promote remote
learning.
4. How the LEA will address the needs of students who require devices and
connectivity in order to access remote learning.
5. How the LEA intends to assess and address student learning gaps resulting from the
disruption in educational services.
In addition to the aforementioned, data regarding the estimated number of jobs created
on account of ESSER funding and information regarding any
subcontracts/subcontractors utilized by the LEA in the work initiated using ESSER
funding will be reported. Collectively, this information will provide ISBE the means to
meet its reporting requirements, gain additional insight into how ESSER funds are
used, and, generally, learn more about the state of the state in regard to the digital
divide in Illinois school districts and communities.
LEAs are required to submit quarterly reporting for each grant received. ISBE uses this
information to demonstrate LEA accountability and transparency for meeting the
requirements of the grant. The reports address program-related activities and services
to ensure compliance and progress of the LEA in meeting the project goals identified in
the application. This monitoring occurs through desk monitoring by staff in the Title
Grants Department within the agency as well as by field-based staff in Federal and
State Monitoring.
In respects to the former, Title Grants staff review the report, which is submitted by the
LEA in the Grant Periodic Reporting System. If there is a lack of alignment between the
report and the identified work in the grant or another issue, Title Grant staff contact the
LEA to provide technical assistance. This allows the LEA to ask questions and, as
applicable, amend or make other corrections. In the case of the latter, Federal and
State Monitoring utilizes a two-pronged risk assessment model designed to comply with
the requirements of 2 CFR 200 and maximize the resources of time, money, and
people.
2. The extent to which the SEA intends to use any portion of its SEA reserve (up to 10 percent of
its ESSER Fund award) to support:
technological capacity and access – including hardware and software, connectivity, and
instructional expertise – to support remote learning. If so, please describe the strategies
the SEA intends to use to serve disadvantaged populations listed in Sec. 18003(d)(4) of
the CARES Act; and
remote learning by developing new informational and academic resources and
expanding awareness of, and access to, best practices and innovations in remote learning
and support for students, families, and educators.
5
ISBE intends to use the 9.5 percent reserve of ESSER funds in five areas: Virtual
Coaching, Technology Devices, Connectivity, Professional Development, and
Funding for non-eligible entities. A total of .5 percent of the reserve will be used for
administrative purposes. The proposed ISBE budget is provided in Table I and the
use and rationale for each program follows.
Table 1: Proposed ISBE Budget
Program Amount
1. Virtual Coaching $6,500,000
2. Devices (e.g., laptops and tablets) $33,319,570
3. Connectivity $7,139,907
4. Professional Development $6,454,909
5. Funding for non-eligible entities $685,000
6. SEA Administration $2,847,336
Total: $56,946,722
1. Virtual Coaching
Use: ISBE, in partnership with the Illinois Education Association (IEA) and the Illinois
Federation of Teachers (IFT), proposes to use approximately $6.5 million of the
Superintendent’s reserve to develop and deliver a virtual coaching and mentoring
program in support of an estimated 4,000 new teachers who will be entering the
teaching profession this fall without (in some cases) finishing their clinical teaching
experience.
Rationale: An estimated 4,000 teacher candidates were unable to complete student
teaching as a result of the COVID-19 national emergency and the concomitant
suspension of in-person instruction in Illinois. This capstone experience is an
essential step in the ongoing development of the teacher candidate as she or he
transitions into the teacher of record. To ensure that teacher candidates, who
otherwise would successfully complete student teaching in the spring 2020 and could
become teachers of record in the fall 2020, ISBE worked with its partners to identify
areas of relief through an executive order and emergency rules.
More specifically, ISBE, in collaboration with partners, such as the Illinois Association
of School Administrators, the Illinois Principals Association, the Illinois Association of
Regional Superintendents of Schools, IEA, IFT, and administration and faculty from
public and private institutions of higher education in Illinois, identified areas and
approaches for relief. Providing waivers for student teaching and successful
completion of the teacher performance assessment during student teaching were
among the proposals. To these ends, an executive order was issued by the Governor
on April 24, 2020, and emergency administrative rules followed on April 27, 2020.
The waivers of student teaching and the teacher performance assessment did provide
teacher candidates a means of obtaining licensure in Illinois, but ISBE and its
partners also determined that these novice teachers require additional support as
they begin their careers. This additional support will include an in-person and
in-building mentor and a virtual coach. The virtual coaches will be selected by the
new teacher based on grade, content, cultural affinity, special education, and bilingual
matching criteria. Each virtual coach will work with approximately 10 teachers for
seven hours per week over 36 instructional weeks beginning as the 2020-2021 school
year commences in districts across Illinois.
Using ESSER funding to develop and deliver virtual coaching and mentoring best
ensures that students, including those who live in low-income homes, have an
identified disability, are English Learners, are homeless or in foster care, and/or are
racial and ethnic minorities, are taught by well-prepared and well-supported teachers.
There is a digital divide in Illinois. What follows is a three-part exposition explicating
this issue, which includes lack of access to devices, connectivity, and professional
learning in best practices for using digital learning to provide students across Illinois
access to rich and rigorous learning opportunities. Using ESSER funds in the ways
identified below is an essential first step in mitigating the factors that create this
divide, as well as providing immediate relief to those students, districts, and
communities most in need.
2. Technology Devices
Use: ISBE proposes to use $33,319,570 of the Superintendent’s reserve toward the
acquisition of devices (e.g., laptops or tablets) for students.
Rationale: According to the 2019 Learning Technology Center of Illinois survey ,
approximately 62 percent of school districts that responded to the survey implement a
1:1 program (n=350). The majority of districts without a 1:1 program are in the
process of researching, planning, or considering adopting a 1:1 program. The
suspension of in-person instruction in Illinois in mid-March and determination that
classroom instruction for the remainder of the 2019-20 school year would occur
remotely identified a substantial digital divide in the state.
At the outset of the school closures, ISBE issued a Remote Learning Survey in which
it asked districts for information on how they intended to deliver remote instruction. Of
the 655 districts that responded, 9 percent deliver remote instruction via digital means
only and 9 percent do not currently possess the ability to deliver any remote
instructions via digital means. The remaining 82 percent of respondents use a
combination of digital and other non-digital means to deliver remote learning. Of
significance, however, is that 81 percent of respondents reported that remote learning
is delivered through the sharing and completion of worksheets and paper packets.
So, too, 87 percent of respondents indicated that the most frequent identified means
of communicating with students using technology is email, while 81 percent identified
that they communicate using another platform, such as Blackboard or Class Dojo.
These data suggest two things. First, while the greater majority of respondents utilize
digital means for the purposes of remote learning, generally, the central way in which
digital means are used is for communicating with students. Second, that over 90
percent of respondents reported that remote learning consists in whole or part
through the delivery of worksheets and paper packets suggests that there are
confluent challenges in a majority of districts with school/district access to devices to
deliver instruction, student access to devices, and/or connectivity.
According to the 2019 Learning Technology Center of Illinois survey results, the
consideration of digital learning prior to the COVID-19 emergency focused on
integrating online textbook technology into traditional classroom instruction.
Understandably, the notion of remote learning as the primary means of instruction via
technology was not considered in the survey. However, the suspension of in-person
instruction for the remainder of the 2019-20 school year and the possibility of
intermittent school closures in the 2020-21 school year obligates ISBE to contemplate
what must occur to ensure that students can access learning opportunities through
devices.
To this end, ISBE will use the Learning Technology Center of Illinois throughout
Illinois for two purposes. First, staff from the Learning Technology Center of Illinois
will assist with the identification of student needs within districts. These needs will
also be evaluated through the percentage of district adequacy used to calculate
Evidence-Based Funding for local district funding in Illinois. Second, during the
summer and fall of 2020, Learning Technology Center of Illinois will build on its
current work of providing professional learning opportunities to districts on topics such
as technology integration, by developing and delivering new informational and
academic resources and expanding awareness of, and access to, best practices and
innovations in remote learning and support for students, families, and educators
based upon identified district need. District-identified need will be ascertained via a
survey currently being administered statewide. Those districts identified with the
greatest need will receive devices first.
3. Connectivity
Use: ISBE proposes to use $7.139,907 of the Superintendent’s reserve toward the
acquisition of connectivity for communities most in need.
Rationale: Once remote learning commenced in Illinois, the connectivity (or lack
thereof) in communities and homes in Illinois emerged as a central reason for a digital
divide across the state. Approximately 10 percent of Illinois school districts use low
bandwidth connections. Students while in school, more than likely, can access digital
learning content with relative ease by either working in a dedicated computer lab or
on a device in their classroom. Once in-person, in-school instruction ceased, the
inability for every family with school-aged children to connect to the internet became
apparent and the need for connectivity became a necessary, and not just nice, part of
delivering high quality remote learning.
Illinois is the home of more than 125,000 committed and excellent teachers and
school leaders. The stories of districts tackling this issue through creative solutions
like outfitting school buses with routers and extenders and placing them strategically
within the community are inspiring, but the fact remains that the need to do so in
multiple locations across Illinois suggests that connectivity is a real issue in many
communities.
The consideration of digital learning prior to the COVID-19 emergency focused on
integrating online textbook technology into traditional classroom instruction.
Connectivity within a school was not a central concern. However, closing schools for
the remainder of the 2019-20 school year and the possibility of intermittent school
closures in the 2020-21 school year obligates ISBE to contemplate what must occur
to ensure that students can access learning opportunities if they are at home or
somewhere else in their community outside of school.
4. Professional Learning
Use: ISBE proposes to use $6,454,909 of the Superintendent’s reserve toward
supporting statewide professional learning opportunities for educators and families in
using digital learning.
Rationale: The final piece of the digital divide dilemma is the need for professional
learning opportunities for educators and families. The general focus of these
activities will be on best practices in developing and delivering online learning and
supporting students who are learning via remote learning.
Once in-person instruction was suspended in Illinois and it was communicated that
the remainder of the school year would be conducted via remote learning, it became
apparent that -- in addition to the devices that connect to the internet in order to
access content -- teachers and families require additional information, approaches,
and/or techniques as they support their students and children. The proliferation of
professional learning via online instruction in the last decade, although typically for the
adult learner, suggests that there is more to developing and supporting online
learning than just using an internet camera and set of links to which students are
directed. Rather there is a body of knowledge that includes content, pedagogy, and
human (child) development that must be understood to support students in K-12
schools who are engaging in online remote learning.
While professional learning for educators and parents is currently taking place and will
be expanded as soon as ESSER funds are available, during the summer and fall of
2020, Learning Technology Center of Illinois will build on its current work of providing
professional learning opportunities to districts by developing and delivering new
informational and academic resources and expanding awareness of, and access to,
best practices and innovations in remote learning and support for students, families,
and educators based upon identified district need. District-identified need will be
ascertained via a survey currently being administered statewide.
Illinois will make great strides in combatting the digital divide through using ESSER
funds to provide devices to students, enabling communities to access connectivity,
and supporting educators and families through professional learning. This work,
including an emphasis on students who live in low-income homes, have an identified
disability, are English Learners, are homeless or in foster care, and/or are racial and
ethnic minorities, is both a matter of being as prepared as possible for an unknown
future and, more importantly, a matter of equity – so that every child can access
digital high-quality, rigorous learning opportunities led by a licensed Illinois teacher
and supported by their families.
5. Funding for non-eligible entities
Use: ISBE will allocate approximately $685,000 to the following entities: Non-eligible
Title I LEAs, Area Vocational Centers, Special Education Joint Agreement
Cooperatives, and Regional Office of Education Alternative School Programs.
Rationale: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic is felt across Illinois in all sectors of
industry and education. There are 177 educational entities that serve P-12 students
that are not eligible to receive funding from the 90 percent of ESSER funds identified
for this purpose. To this end, ISBE will fund the following entities: Non-eligible Title I
LEAs, Area Vocational Centers, Special Education Joint Agreement Cooperatives,
and Regional Office of Education Alternative School Programs at $19 per enrolled
student. The per student amount is based upon is based upon student enrollment on
March 16, 2020 as is at the minimum per pupil amount allocated to the least
resourced Title I Eligible LEA.
6. SEA Administration
Use: ISBE will use $2,847,336 for the purposes of SEA Administration. In particular,
funds will be allocated for two purposes. First, funding will purchase devices and
connectivity (e.g., air card) for ISBE staff to work remotely ($420,025). The remaining
$2,284,994 will support the continuity of operations while staff is required to work
remotely.
Rationale: The COVID-19 national emergency and state disaster proclamation
coupled with the quick response in March from ISBE and its staff in moving into
remote work demonstrated the nimbleness of ISBE as an organization. However, the
quick transition from office to remote work also identified areas in which ISBE was not
as well prepared. The uncertainty of the future in respects to COVID-19 nationally and
in Illinois, require that ISBE take steps to ensure operations can continue should
remote work become necessary in the 2020-2021 school year. The use of SEA
Administration funds in the ways identified above create the greatest likelihood of a
smooth transition between office and remote work as well as the seamless
continuation of services to the field.
PART D: OTHER ASSURANCES AND CERTIFICATIONS
The [Chief State School Officer or his/her authorized representative] assures or certifies the
following:
1. The SEA will comply with all applicable assurances in OMB Standard Forms 424B and D
(Assurances for Non-Construction and Construction Programs), including the assurances
relating to the legal authority to apply for assistance; access to records; conflict of interest; merit
systems; nondiscrimination; Hatch Act provisions; labor standards; flood hazards; historic
preservation; protection of human subjects; animal welfare; lead-based paint; Single Audit Act;
and the general agreement to comply with all applicable Federal laws, executive orders and
regulations.
2. With respect to the certification regarding lobbying in Department Form 80-0013, no Federal
appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee
of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the making or
renewal of Federal grants under this program; the SEAe will complete and submit Standard
Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” when required (34 C.F.R. Part 82,
Appendix B); and the SEA will require the full certification, as set forth in 34 C.F.R. Part 82,
Appendix A, in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers.
3. Any LEA receiving funding under this program will have on file with the SEA a set of
assurances that meets the requirements of section 442 of the General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA) (20 U.S.C. 1232e).
4. To the extent applicable, an LEA will include in its local application a description of how the
LEA will comply with the requirements of section 427 of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1228a). The
description must include information on the steps the LEA proposes to take to permit students,
teachers, and other program beneficiaries to overcome barriers (including barriers based on
gender, race, color, national origin, disability, and age) that impede equal access to, or
participation in, the program.
5. The SEA will comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) requirements in Subpart D—Post
Federal Award Requirements (2 CFR §§200.300-345) and Subpart E—Cost Principles (2 CFR
§§200.400-475) to ensure that LEAs, including charter schools that are LEAs, are using ESSER
funds for purposes that are reasonable, necessary, and allocable under the CARES Act.
6. The SEA and other entities will comply with the provisions of all applicable acts, regulations
and assurances; the following provisions of Education Department General Administrative
Regulations (EDGAR) 34 CFR parts 76, 77, 81, 82, 84, 97, 98, and 99; the OMB Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part
180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485; and the
Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3474.
Chief State School Officer or Authorized Representative (Printed Name):
Signature:
Date:
6
05/11/2020
Carmen I. Ayala
Digitally signed by Carmen I. Ayala
Date: 2020.05.11 19:23:27 -05'00'
click to sign
signature
click to edit
Appendix A: Relevant Excerpts from Title VIII of Division B of the CARES
Act, the Emergency Appropriations for Coronavirus Health Response and
Agency Operations
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND
For an additional amount for ‘‘Education Stabilization Fund’’, $30,750,000,000, to remain available
through September 30, 2021, to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically or
internationally: Provided, That such amount is designated by the Congress as being for an
emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
EDUCATION STABILIZATION FUND
SEC. 18001. (a) ALLOCATIONS.—From the amount made available under this heading in this Act
to carry out the Education Stabilization Fund, the Secretary shall first allocate
(1) not more than 1/2 of 1 percent to the outlying areas on the basis of their respective needs, as
determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior;
(2) one-half of 1 percent for the Secretary of Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of
Education, for programs operated or funded by the Bureau of Indian Education; and
(3) 1 percent for grants to States with the highest coronavirus burden to support activities under this
heading in this Act, for which the Secretary shall issue a notice inviting applications not later than
30 days of enactment of this Act and approve or deny applications not later than 30 days after
receipt.
(b) RESERVATIONS.—After carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall reserve the remaining
funds made available as follows:
(1) 9.8 percent to carry out section 18002 of this title.
(2) 43.9 percent to carry out section 18003 of this title.
(3) 46.3 percent to carry out section 18004 of this title.
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND
SEC. 18003. (a) GRANTS.—From funds reserved under section 18001(b)(2) of this title, the
Secretary shall make elementary and secondary school emergency relief grants to each State
educational agency with an approved application. The Secretary shall issue a notice inviting
applications not later than 30 days of enactment of this Act and approve or deny applications not
later than 30 days after receipt.
(b) ALLOCATIONS TO STATES.—The amount of each grant under subsection (a) shall be
allocated by the Secretary to each State in the same proportion as each State received under part A
of title I of the ESEA of 1965 in the most recent fiscal year.
(c) SUBGRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.Each State shall allocate not less
than 90 percent of the grant funds awarded to the State under this section as subgrants to local
educational agencies (including charter schools that are local educational agencies) in the State in
proportion to the amount of funds such local educational agencies and charter schools that are local
educational agencies received under part A of title I of the ESEA of 1965
in the most recent fiscal year.
(d) USES OF FUNDS.A local educational agency that receives funds under this title may use the
funds for any of the following:
7
(1) Any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965, including the Native Hawaiian Education Act and
the Alaska Native Educational Equity, Support, and Assistance Act (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) (‘‘IDEA’’), the Adult
Education and Family Literacy Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), the Carl D. Perkins Career and
Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) (‘‘the Perkins Act’’), or subtitle B of title
VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq.).
(2) Coordination of preparedness and response efforts of local educational agencies with State,
local, Tribal, and territorial public health departments, and other relevant agencies,
to improve coordinated responses among such entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to
coronavirus.
(3) Providing principals and others school leaders with the resources necessary to address the needs
of their individual schools.
(4) Activities to address the unique needs of low-income children or students, children with
disabilities, English learners, racial and ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, and
foster care youth, including how outreach and service delivery will meet the needs of each
population.
(5) Developing and implementing procedures and systems to improve the preparedness and
response efforts of local educational agencies.
(6) Training and professional development for staff of the local educational agency on sanitation
and minimizing the spread of infectious diseases.
(7) Purchasing supplies to sanitize and clean the facilities of a local educational agency, including
buildings operated by such agency.
(8) Planning for and coordinating during long-term closures, including for how to provide meals to
eligible students, how to provide technology for online learning to all students,
how to provide guidance for carrying out requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) and how to ensure other educational services can continue
to be provided consistent with all Federal, State, and local requirements.
(9) Purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students
who are served by the local educational agency that aids in regular and substantive
educational interaction between students and their classroom instructors, including low-income
students and students with disabilities, which may include assistive technology
or adaptive equipment.
(10) Providing mental health services and supports.
(11) Planning and implementing activities related to summer learning and supplemental afterschool
programs, including providing classroom instruction or online learning
during the summer months and addressing the needs of low-income students, students with
disabilities, English learners, migrant students, students experiencing homelessness, and
children in foster care.
(12) Other activities that are necessary to maintain the operation of and continuity of services in
local educational agencies and continuing to employ existing staff of the local educational agency.
(e) STATE FUNDING.—With funds not otherwise allocated under subsection (c), a State may
reserve not more than 1/2 of 1 percent for administrative costs and the remainder for emergency
needs as determined by the state educational agency to address issues responding to coronavirus,
which may be addressed through the use of grants or contracts.
(f) REALLOCATION.A State shall return to the Secretary any
funds received under this section that the State does not award within 1 year of receiving such funds
and the Secretary shall reallocate such funds to the remaining States in accordance with
subsection (b).
8
ASSISTANCE TO NON-PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SEC. 18005. (a) IN GENERAL.—A local educational agency receiving funds under sections 18002
or 18003 of this title shall provide equitable services in the same manner as provided under section
1117 of the ESEA of 1965 to students and teachers in non-public schools, as determined in
consultation with representatives of non-public schools.
(b) PUBLIC CONTROL OF FUNDS.—The control of funds for the services and assistance
provided to a non-public school under subsection (a), and title to materials, equipment, and property
purchased with such funds, shall be in a public agency, and a public agency shall administer such
funds, materials, equipment, and property and shall provide such services (or may contract for the
provision of such services with a public or private entity).
CONTINUED PAYMENT TO EMPLOYEES
SEC. 18006. A local educational agency, State, institution of higher education, or other entity that
receives funds under ‘‘Education Stabilization Fund’’, shall to the greatest extent practicable,
continue to pay its employees and contractors during the period of any disruptions or closures
related to coronavirus.
DEFINITIONS
SEC. 18007. Except as otherwise provided in sections 18001– 18006 of this title, as used in such
sections
(1) the terms ‘‘elementary education’’ and ‘‘secondary education’’ have the meaning given such
terms under State law;
(2) the term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the meaning given such term in title I of the
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.);
(3) the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of Education;
(4) the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico;
(5) the term ‘‘cost of attendance’’ has the meaning given such term in section 472 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965.
(6) the term ‘‘Non-public school’’ means a non-public elementary and secondary school that (A) is
accredited, licensed, or otherwise operates in accordance with State law; and
(B) was in existence prior to the date of the qualifying emergency for which grants are awarded
under this section;
(7) the term ‘‘public school’’ means a public elementary or secondary school; and
(8) any other term used that is defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801) shall have the meaning given the term in such
section.
MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT
SEC. 18008. (a) A State’s application for funds to carry out sections 18002 or 18003 of this title
shall include assurances that the State will maintain support for elementary and secondary
education, and State support for higher education (which shall include State funding to institutions
of higher education and state need based financial aid, and shall not include support for capital
projects or for research and development or tuition and fees paid by students) in fiscal years 2020
and 2021 at least at the levels of such support that is the average of such State’s support for
elementary and secondary education and for higher education provided in the 3 fiscal years
preceding the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) The secretary may waive the requirement in subsection (a) for the purpose of relieving fiscal
burdens on States that have experienced a precipitous decline in financial resources.
9
REPORTING ON USE OF FUNDS SEC. 15011.
(a) In this section
(1) the terms ‘‘agency’’, ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’, ‘‘Committee’’, ‘‘covered
funds’’, and ‘‘Coronavirus response’’ have the meanings given those terms in section 15010;
(2) the term ‘‘covered recipient’’ (A) means any entity that receives large covered funds; and (B)
includes any State, the District of Columbia, and any territory or possession of the United States;
and
(3) the term ‘‘large covered funds’’ means covered funds that amount to more than $150,000.
(b)(2) Not later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter, each covered recipient shall
submit to the agency and the Committee a report that contains—
(A) the total amount of large covered funds received from the agency;
(B) the amount of large covered funds received that were expended or obligated for each project or
activity;
(C) a detailed list of all projects or activities for which large covered funds were expended or
obligated, including—
(i) the name of the project or activity;
(ii) a description of the project or activity; and
(iii) the estimated number of jobs created or retained by the project or activity, where applicable;
and
(D) detailed information on any level of subcontracts or subgrants awarded by the covered recipient
or its subcontractors or subgrantees, to include the data elements required to comply with the
Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note) allowing
aggregate reporting on awards below $50,000 or to individuals, as prescribed by the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget.
(3) Not later than 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter, the Committee, in consultation
with the agency that made large covered funds available to any covered recipient shall make the
information in reports submitted under paragraph (2) publicly available by posting the information
on the website established under section 15010(g).
(4)(A) Each agency, in coordination with the Committee and the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget shall provide user-friendly means for covered recipients to meet
requirements of this subsection.
(B) Federal agencies may use existing mechanisms to ensure that information under this subsection
is reported accurately.
(c)(1) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Secretary of
the Treasury, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, and the Chairperson of the
Council of Economic Advisors, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and
publicly release on the website established under section 15010(g) quarterly reports that detail the
impact of programs funded through large covered funds on employment, estimated economic
growth, and other key economic indicators, including information about impacted industries.
(2)(A) The first report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than 45 days after
the end of the first full quarter following the date of enactment of this Act.
(B) The last report required to be submitted under paragraph (1) shall apply to the quarter in which
the Committee terminates.
10
APPENDIX B: STATE ALLOCATION TABLE
Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund
STATE
STATE
TOTAL
Minimum LEA
Distribution
1
Maximum SEA
Reservation
Maximum for
SEA
Administration
2
TOTAL
13,229,265,000
11,906,338,500
1,322,926,500
66,146,325
ALABAMA
216,947,540
195,252,786
21,694,754
1,084,738
ALASKA
38,407,914
34,567,123
3,840,791
192,040
ARIZONA
277,422,944
249,680,650
27,742,294
1,387,115
ARKANSAS
128,758,638
115,882,774
12,875,864
643,793
CALIFORNIA
1,647,306,127
1,482,575,514
164,730,613
8,236,531
COLORADO
120,993,782
108,894,404
12,099,378
604,969
CONNECTICUT
111,068,059
99,961,253
11,106,806
555,340
DELAWARE
43,492,753
39,143,478
4,349,275
217,464
DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
42,006,354
37,805,719 4,200,635 210,032
FLORIDA
770,247,851
693,223,066
77,024,785
3,851,239
GEORGIA
457,169,852
411,452,867
45,716,985
2,285,849
HAWAII
43,385,229
39,046,706
4,338,523
216,926
IDAHO
47,854,695
43,069,226
4,785,470
239,273
ILLINOIS
569,467,218
512,520,496
56,946,722
2,847,336
INDIANA
214,472,770
193,025,493
21,447,277
1,072,364
IOWA
71,625,561
64,463,005
7,162,556
358,128
KANSAS
84,529,061
76,076,155
8,452,906
422,645
KENTUCKY
193,186,874
173,868,187
19,318,687
965,934
LOUISIANA
286,980,175
258,282,158
28,698,018
1,434,901
MAINE
43,793,319
39,413,987
4,379,332
218,967
MARYLAND
207,834,058
187,050,652
20,783,406
1,039,170
MASSACHUSETTS
214,894,317
193,404,885
21,489,432
1,074,472
MICHIGAN
389,796,984
350,817,286
38,979,698
1,948,985
MINNESOTA
140,137,253
126,123,528
14,013,725
700,686
MISSISSIPPI
169,883,002
152,894,702
16,988,300
849,415
MISSOURI
208,443,300
187,598,970
20,844,330
1,042,217
MONTANA
41,295,230
37,165,707
4,129,523
206,476
NEBRASKA
65,085,085
58,576,577
6,508,509
325,425
NEVADA
117,185,045
105,466,541
11,718,505
585,925
NEW HAMPSHIRE
37,641,372
33,877,235
3,764,137
188,207
NEW JERSEY
310,371,213
279,334,092
31,037,121
1,551,856
NEW MEXICO
108,574,786
97,717,307
10,857,479
542,874
NEW YORK
1,037,045,603
933,341,043
103,704,560
5,185,228
NORTH CAROLINA
396,311,607
356,680,446
39,631,161
1,981,558
NORTH DAKOTA
33,297,699
29,967,929
3,329,770
166,489
OHIO
489,205,200
440,284,680
48,920,520
2,446,026
OKLAHOMA
160,950,476
144,855,428
16,095,048
804,752
1
The totals in the Minimum LEA Distribution, Maximum SEA Reservation, and Maximum for SEA Administration columns have been rounded to the
nearest whole dollar.
2
With the funds not subgranted to LEAs, the SEA may reserve up to an amount equal to ½ of 1 percent of the total allocation for administrative costs.
11
STATE
STATE
TOTAL
Minimum LEA
Distribution
3
Maximum SEA
Reservation
Maximum for
SEA
Administration
4
OREGON
121,099,019
108,989,117
12,109,902
605,495
PENNSYLVANIA
523,807,198
471,426,478
52,380,720
2,619,036
RHODE ISLAND
46,350,444
41,715,400
4,635,044
231,752
SOUTH CAROLINA
216,311,158
194,680,042
21,631,116
1,081,556
SOUTH DAKOTA
41,295,230
37,165,707
4,129,523
206,476
TENNESSEE
259,891,154
233,902,039
25,989,115
1,299,456
TEXAS
1,285,886,064
1,157,297,458
128,588,606
6,429,430
UTAH
67,821,787
61,039,608
6,782,179
339,109
VERMONT
31,148,360
28,033,524
3,114,836
155,742
VIRGINIA
238,599,192
214,739,273
23,859,919
1,192,996
WASHINGTON
216,892,447
195,203,202
21,689,245
1,084,462
WEST VIRGINIA
86,640,471
77,976,424
8,664,047
433,202
WISCONSIN
174,777,774
157,299,997
17,477,777
873,889
WYOMING
32,562,651
29,306,386
3,256,265
162,813
PUERTO RICO
349,113,105
314,201,795
34,911,311
1,745,566
3
The totals in the Minimum LEA Distribution, Maximum SEA Reservation, and Maximum for SEA Administration columns have been rounded to the
nearest whole dollar.
4
With the funds not subgranted to LEAs, the SEA may reserve up to an amount equal to ½ of 1 percent of the total allocation for administrative costs.
12
Print
Reset Form