Fillable Supporting Services Professional Growth System (Montgomery Schools)

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank Supporting Services Professional Growth System (Montgomery Schools) Form

Use Fill to complete blank online MONTGOMERY SCHOOLS (ROCKVILLE, MD) pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

Supporting Services Professional Growth System (Montgomery Schools)

On average this form takes 15 minutes to complete

The Supporting Services Professional Growth System (Montgomery Schools) form is 6 pages long and contains:

  • 0 signatures
  • 0 check-boxes
  • 61 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

Use our library of forms to quickly fill and sign your Montgomery Schools (Rockville, MD) forms online.

BROWSE MONTGOMERY SCHOOLS (ROCKVILLE, MD) FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
Evaluation Form:
Supporting Services Professional Growth System
Office of Human Resources and Development (OHRD)
Department of Professional Growth Systems
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Rockville, Maryland
Negotiated Agreement between SEIU Local 500, CTW, and the Board of Education of Montgomery County
Name ___________________________________________________ Employee ID # Date
□  *Permanent Status Evaluation □  Scheduled Evaluation □  **Off-cycle Evaluation □  PAR Follow-UP □  ***Interim Evaluation
Department/School
Position
Notes: *** If this is a Permanent Status Evaluation, probationary employees should be able to demonstrate their potential to meet the
general and technical Knowledge of Job core competency performance criteria.
*** An Off-cycle Evaluation can be used:
• as a tool to work with underperforming employees to let them know the status of their current performance
• as a way to call attention to exceptionally good work
• following the end of the 90-day special evaluation within the Performance Improvement Process
*** An Interim Evaluation is prepared if there is a change of supervisor or if employees transfer prior to the time for their
regularly scheduled performance evaluation. (See Article 30, paragraph B2 of the Negotiated Agreement between SEIU
Local 500, CTW, and the Board of Education of Montgomery County.)
Roles and Responsibilities
• The evaluator is the direct line supervisor. The reviewer is a higher level supervisor, if one exists. Montgomery County Education
Association (MCEA) employees do not write evaluations and are not evaluators or reviewers, but may provide indirect feedback.
(See Supporting Services Professional Growth System (SSPGS)—then link to: http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/
professionalgrowth/supporting/default.aspx Handbook for clarification.)
Providing Examples and Evidence
•
In the “Examples/Evidence” section, provide specific examples/evidence of how employees have demonstrated or not demonstrated
meeting competency. Narratives written in the Claim, Examples/Evidence, Impact, Judgment (CEIJ) format are preferred.
Completing the Form
• Evaluator completes all parts of the form. Reviewer reviews and signs the form. No section of the form should be left blank.
• Evaluator discusses the evaluation with the employee.
• Evaluator and employee sign the evaluation.
• One copy is kept in the employee’s local file, one is given to the employee, and one is sent to the OHRD Department of
Professional Growth Systems.
Due Dates
• Permanent Status Evaluation: Due no later than six months after the date of hire.
• Scheduled Evaluation:
• Meets Competency: Submit by the last instructional day for students.
• Does Not Meet Competency: Submit by first Friday in March.
• Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Follow-Up: Due one year after completing PAR.
MCPS Form 430-90
January 2018
Page 1 of 6
Name ______________________________________________________ Employee ID # Date
MCPS Form 430-90, January 2018 Page 2 of 6
PART I—CORE COMPETENCIES
The core competencies listed below are defined by performance criteria. These performance criteria offer suggestions for how the core
competencies may be observed. (See SSPGS Handbook.)
Rating: There are two possible ratings—Meets Competency and Does Not Meet Competency. Using the examples/evidence, determine
the overall assessment of the employee’s performance in a particular competency.
• Meets Competency (MC): Reflects performance over a sustained period of time that clearly and consistently meets competency
performance criteria as cited in the SSPGS Handbook.
• Does Not Meet Competency (NMC): Reflects performance that regularly fails to meet competency performance criteria.
Core Competencies/Performance Criteria Examples/Evidence Rating
COMMITMENT TO STUDENTS
• Understands how the job contributes to
Success for Every Student
• Cares genuinely about the overall learning
environment to ensure student success
• Acts with the student in mind
• Is dedicated to meeting expectations
of principals, supervisors, staff, parents/
guardians, and students
• Is dedicated to supporting high-quality
education for students
• Is dedicated to the successful achievement/
performance of all groups by supporting the
elimination of racial and ethnic inequalities
□  MC
□  NMC
KNOWLEDGE OF JOB
• General Competencies
- Understands assigned job duties
- Is knowledgeable about current and new
practices and methods
- Uses appropriate materials, equipment, and
resources
- Implements and completes work
assignments
- Learns new skills and procedures
- Knows appropriate policies, procedures, and
regulations
• Technical Competencies
Applies the knowledge and skills needed to
do the job, including technical competencies
required by employee’s specific position
classification (See job description and
Reference Checklist.)
□  MC
□  NMC
Core Competencies/Performance Criteria Examples/Evidence Rating
PROFESSIONALISM
• Patient to hear the entire story
• Calm under pressure
• Timely with information
• Positive, dependable, reliable, and trustworthy
• Responds to all people equitably
• Proactive when handling all situations
• Possesses the ability to handle all matters in a
professional and confidential manner
□  MC
□  NMC
INTERPERSONAL
• Polite and approachable
• Able to be a team member/team player
• Cares about people
• Available and ready to help
• Treats people with respect
• Acts as a mentor and a student advocate
• Attempts to understand other perspectives
• Relates well to others
□  MC
□  NMC
Name ______________________________________________________ Employee ID #
Date
MCPS Form 430-90, January 2018 Page 3 of 6
Core Competencies/Performance Criteria Examples/Evidence Rating
COMMUNICATION
• Understands how to be an active listener
• Effective in oral and written skills
• Able to communicate well to manage conflict
and deal effectively with problem situations
• Tactful when handling situations and difficulties
with the least possible disruption
□  MC
□  NMC
ORGANIZATION
• Knows how to get things done in the
classroom, school, office, or other work
locations
• Assists as needed to organize meetings and
tasks
• Anticipates needs of principals, supervisors,
staff, parents/guardians, and students
• Gets things done in a timely manner
• Manages a broad range of activities
□  MC
□  NMC
Name ______________________________________________________ Employee ID #
Date
MCPS Form 430-90, January 2018 Page 4 of 6
Core Competencies/Performance Criteria Examples/Evidence Rating
PROBLEM SOLVING
• Changes routines to fit the needs of the
situation
• Accesses and uses resources effectively and
efficiently
• Identifies process improvements
• Explores beyond the obvious when solving
problems
• Asks appropriate questions to clarify a situation
• Logical when discussing the pros and cons of
situations
• Quickly recognizes issues and their implications
□  MC
□  NMC
PART II—ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
(For example, you might address the past year’s record of accomplishments, letters of recommendation, and training courses taken.)
Name ______________________________________________________ Employee ID #
Date
MCPS Form 430-90, January 2018 Page 5 of 6
MCPS Form 430-90, January 2018 Page 6 of 6
PART III—SUGGESTIONS FOR CONTINUED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PART IV—FINAL RATING
Please indicate the final rating by checking the appropriate box below. Evidence and comments to support this rating should be
included in Parts I, II, and III.
□  Meets all core competencies □  Does not meet one or more of the core competencies
PART V—SIGNATURES
/ /
Signature, Evaluator Date Printed Name and Job Title, Evaluator
/ /
Signature, Reviewer Date Printed Name and Job Title, Reviewer
I have participated in this evaluation / /
Signature, Employee Date
(BY SIGNING THIS EVALUATION THE EMPLOYEE DOES NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO AGREE WITH THE CONTENTS AND MAY ATTACH
COMMENTS TO THIS FORM.)
Name ______________________________________________________ Employee ID #
Date
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

Supporting Services Professional Growth System (Montgomery Schools)

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 10 May 2022

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document