Winthrop
University
Administrative
Review
Supervisor’s Review Form
The Winthrop University
Administrator Review
provides individuals with
important information for professional growth and development. As part of
the review process, the administrator completes a self-review, and the
administrator’s immediate supervisor facilitates internal and external
reviews. The immediate supervisor then incorporates the
administrator’s
self-review
into these materials, and provides the following
summary of
internal and external reviews
,
supervisor’s review and comments
, and
suggestions for development
for review and discussion with the
administrator.
SUPERVISOR’S REVIEW AND COMMENTS
Supervisor’s Review Form
2
Please fill in all shaded areas, which will expand to fit your entry.
Use tab or arrow keys to move to next space.
Review of:
Title:
Supervisor:
Date:
Rating scale: Please enter the appropriate number in the box next to each category
based on the following scale:
4 Performance exceeds expectations
3 Performance meets expectations
2 Performance meets marginal expectations
1 Performance fails to meet expectations
0 Don’t know or not applicable
Note: The major characteristics you are asked to assess below are described by several different
descriptors which provide broad guidelines for each major area. Please provide additional comments
as appropriate in each area.
Leadership
Articulates a vision for the School/Division/Department.
Inspires/motivates faculty/staff to work toward the goals of the unit.
Uses an effective administrative style that is consistent with practices within institutions of
higher education.
Comments:
Organizational Style
Executes routine duties effectively and efficiently (e.g. budgeting, planning).
Delegates authority, provides support or supervision of subordinates as needed and
displays reasonable creativity in the use of resources.
Shows leadership and imagination in making decisions and involves relevant personnel in
the process.
Comments:
SUPERVISOR’S REVIEW AND COMMENTS
Supervisor’s Review Form
3
Quality of Work
Exhibits a clear sense of direction compatible with the University’s purpose and policies, an
understanding of the duties of the position, and the knowledge necessary to do the job as
expected.
Is persistent and dependable, generally managing to get things done in a sound and
efficient manner.
Shows creativity and fosters an atmosphere which encourages development of new ideas
and innovative approaches.
Comments:
Professionalism
Remains professionally current by reading, attending conferences, conducting research
and publishing, or maintaining involvement in other professional activities.
Acts with integrity and discretion in matters both personal and professional and treats
associates in a fair manner.
Shows reasonable poise and emotional stability and maintains a positive approach to
problems or adversity.
Comments:
Judgment
Concentrates on essentials rather than trivial details.
Generally makes sound judgments and involves others in decisions which affect them,
basing those judgments on evidence rather than prejudice or personal convenience.
Makes sound evaluations, offers counsel when appropriate, and also acknowledges and
rewards competence and dedication.
Comments:
SUPERVISOR’S REVIEW AND COMMENTS
Supervisor’s Review Form
4
Communication Skills
Is an effective communicator, for example, in such matters as submitting reports that are
complete and punctual, and effectively representing the department or program to the
administration and to other departments.
Has an open mind, listens well, and generally accepts and offers constructive criticism.
Comments:
Interaction with Administrators, Faculty, Staff, Students and
External Constituencies
Communicates information from the unit to the administration and from the administration
to the unit.
Works to understand viewpoints being expressed by supervisors, peers, and subordinates.
Considers the welfare of the unit, as well as the University as a whole, when making
decisions.
Represents the unit effectively when working with outside agencies.
Comments:
Overall Effectiveness
Based on all of the above, how do you rate the overall performance of this person?
Other comments:
SUPERVISOR’S REVIEW AND COMMENTS
Supervisor’s Review Form
5
0B
1B
Please print this form for signatures after entering all information.
OPTIONAL:
The executive staff member to whom the supervisor reports is encouraged to review the
assessment of the administrator for comments prior to the supervisor meeting with the
administrator.
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Signature/Title of Executive Staff Member to whom the Supervisor Date
Reports
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Signature/Title of Direct Supervisor (reviewer) Date
The administrator is invited to sign below, following a conference with the immediate
supervisor, as an indication that the review has been discussed.
The administrator’s signature does not imply agreement with the supervisor’s
review.
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Administrator (person being reviewed) Date