Southern Utah University Institutional Review Board
REVIEWER CHECKLIST
CHILDREN AS SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH
This form should be downloaded and opened with Adobe Reader or Adobe
Acrobat.
Reviewer Reviewer's College Date
Reviewer's E-mail Reviewer's Phone Extension
Title of Proposed Research
Principle Investigator (PI) PI's E-mail
PI's College
RISK DETERMINATION
Select One
Minimal: Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort
anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily
encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological
examinations or tests.
Greater than Minimal Risk
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
Select One
Potential benefit(s) to child
No direct benefit to individual but offers general knowledge about the child's condition or
disorder
No direct benefit to child but potential to, “understand, prevent, or alleviate a serious
problem affecting the health and welfare of subjects”
IRB ACTION
Select One
Should be Approved
Approvable on case-by-case basis (Risk may not be more than a minor increase over
minimal risk.)
Should Not Approve (Approval of research must be made the Secretary of Health and
Human Services with input from selected experts, and following opportunity for public
review and comment.
If research is no more than minimal risk. (One parent/guardian may sign the parental permission
document.)
If research involves greater than minimal risk but presents the prospect of direct benefit to the
individual subject. (One parent/guardian may sign the parental permission document.)
If research involves greater than minimal risk and has no prospect of direct benefit to the individual
subject, but is likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subject’s disorder or condition.
(Both parents/guardians must sign the parental permission document.)
If research not otherwise approvable which presents an opportunity to understand, prevent, or
alleviate a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of children. (Both parents/guardians may
sign the parental permission document.)
Check the appropriate boxes below. If you answer No, describe in Requested Revisions/
Clarifications section.
If greater than minimal risk, convincing scientific and ethical justifications are provided.
YES NO N/A
If the study involves normal volunteers, this has been justified.
YES NO N/A
Have appropriate studies been conducted on animals and adults to justify studies on children?
YES NO N/A
If no to the above, the lack of appropriate studies conducted on animal and adults has been
justified.
YES NO N/A
The appropriate age groups have been included for proposed research questions.
YES NO N/A
Efforts have been made to ensure that parents’ permission to involve children is free from
coercion, exploitation, and/or unrealistic promises.
YES NO N/A
Assent will be obtained from children 7-17 years of age and dissent has been adequately
handled.
YES NO N/A
Reporting of abuse or neglect has been addressed, if applicable.
YES NO N/A
Implications for other family members as a result of this research has been adequately
addressed (i.e., genetic risk, HIV infection, etc.).
YES NO N/A
Requested Revisions/Clarifications: Provide more information if you answered “No” to any
questions above.
Submit