SURE FELLOWSHIP APPLICANT
RECOMMENDATION FORM
1 of 2
STUDENT INSTRUCTIONS:
Applicant to complete entire top section.
SAVE the document (this saves your revisions)
Email this document to your evaluator.
Name of Applicant Name of Evaluator
Student Last
Student First
Initial
Major
Title
Department
University
EVALUATOR INSTRUCTIONS:
Evaluator to complete sec
tion below
SAVE the document (this saves your revisions)
Email this document to soe.associatedeansoffice@udayton.edu
ACQUAINTANCE WITH APPLICANT:
1. I have known the applicant for_______ years and/or _______ months.
2. I hav
e known the applicant as:
A student in one class
Other (specify)
3. I hav
e served as the applicant’s:
Instructor
Department Chairman
Advisor
Other (specify)
4. In c
omparison with a representative group of students who have approximately the same education and
experience, how do you rate the applicant in GENERAL ALL-AROUND ABILITY?
Truly Exceptional. Equivalent to the very best that you have known.
Outstanding. Comparable to the best student in a current class. Highest 5%.
Unusual. Next highest 5%.
Above Average. Ability easily identifiable. Upper 20%.
Average. Upper 50% but not upper 20%.
Below Average. Lower 50%.
Pl
ease complete the next page.
Deadline:
Jan 31
SURE FELLOWSHIP APPLICANT
RECOMMENDATION FORM
2 of 2
5. WRITTEN EVALUATION: In the space below, please describe in some detail the applicant's abilities.
In particular, comment on the applicant's potential as an undergraduate student and as an engineer or
scientist including major academic strengths and weaknesses, versatility, and initiative. We are
particularly interested in the student with high potential that may not be reflected in the overall
undergraduate grade point average. Please be specific in discussing the qualifications of such a student.
Your comments here are of particular importance in the selection process.
(If a separate sheet is used for this
evaluation, please clearly indicate the applicant's name.)
CONFI
DENTIALITY: Before signing this report you should check one of the two blocks below. If you wish to
have comments held in confidence so as to not reveal your identity as their author, you should check Block A. If
Block A is checked, the University of Dayton will honor your request to the extent permitted by law, under the
Privacy Act of 1974.
A
My preparation of this Reference Evaluation is conditioned upon the promise of the University of
Dayton to hold my identify as author of these comments in confidence.
B
My preparation of this Reference Evaluation is not conditioned upon the promise of the University
of Dayton to hold my identity as author of these comments in confidence.
Signature of Evaluator
Date
SAVE the document (this saves your revisions) | Email this document to soe.associatedeansoffice@udayton.edu
Deadline: Jan 31
click to sign
signature
click to edit