CoC-FORM-01 Version 02-2017 Page 28 of 32
Section 3 –Review of Report on Extended Internship
(Task 2)
Who needs to complete this section?
The Primary Advisor and Industry Partner (or nominee) must complete this review, other
Advisory Panel members may also contribute if considered necessary or appropriate.
What needs to be done?
The Primary Advisor and Industry Partner (or nominee) should undertake their review of
the Candidate’s internship report
and complete this section as a joint review. However, if
this is not possible due to location or schedule, separate reports may be submitted by
each assessor. If necessary, additional feedback can be provided in a document
attached to this form.
If there is disagreement between the assessors, separate reviews may be completed
and the issues raised must be noted in an additional document attached to this form.
Dates
Date written work submitted to Primary Advisor:
Date Internship Report and this review submitted to Graduate Research
School
Review of Internship Report
The response to the needs of the industry partner in the report of the project was:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
The critical analysis of the of problem was:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
The use of relevant scholarly and grey literature was:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
The report was organised in a logically structured manner:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
The clarity of expression and mastery of English in the report was:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
The critical analysis of the results in the report was:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
The outcomes achieved during the 4-5 month internship were:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
The relevance of the Key Findings and Recommendations of the report to the industry partner
was:
Adequate Inadequate Partially Adequate see comments below
CoC-FORM-01 Version 02-2017 Page 29 of 32
Checks
Has the Candidate had their Report checked for plagiarism through
‘Safe Assign’ or other plagiarism software e.g. ‘iThenticate’ and
discussed the plagiarism report with their Primary Advisor
Yes
No
Comments
Please provide any comments or feedback below. If you have indicated ‘Partially
Adequate’ or Inadequate - see comments’ please detail why this evaluation was
appropriate.
Type here (the box will expand as you type)
Summary
The Candidate's Report is of a suitable scope and standard in
accordance with the Assessment Guidelines and the Candidate
has achieved a passing grade in this task.
Yes No