Fillable RD7004 Section 1- Proposal Review Form (James Cook University of North Queensland)

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank RD7004 Section 1- Proposal Review Form (James Cook University of North Queensland) Form

Use Fill to complete blank online JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY OF NORTH QUEENSLAND pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

RD7004 Section 1- Proposal Review Form (James Cook University of North Queensland)

On average this form takes 9 minutes to complete

The RD7004 Section 1- Proposal Review Form (James Cook University of North Queensland) form is 3 pages long and contains:

  • 2 signatures
  • 24 check-boxes
  • 16 other fields

Country of origin: AUSTRALIA
File type: PDF

Australia forms for James Cook University of North Queensland

BROWSE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY OF NORTH QUEENSLAND FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
CoC-FORM-01 Version 02-2017 Page 23 of 32
APPENDIX 2
Candidate’s Details
First /Given Name:
Surname / Family Name:
Student ID:
Degree:
☐
PhD
☐
Masters by
Research
Short title of thesis/portfolio:
Primary Advisor:
Industry Partner:
Section 1 –Review of Proposal Agreement for Industry
Placement (Task 1)
Who needs to complete this section?
An external assessor must complete this review assessment after the proposal has been
completed to the satisfaction of the Primary Advisor and Industry Partner.
What needs to be done?
The GRS should send the Candidate’s proposal (which must be on the agreed pro-
forma) to an external assessor who is independent of James Cook University, the
advisory panel, the industry partner and the candidate. If necessary, additional
feedback can be provided in a document attached to this form.
Dates
Date proposal submitted to Primary Advisor:
Date proposal and expert review submitted to Graduate Research
School
Expert Reviewer’s Report (Task 1)
Expert Reviewer must complete this section
Information for Expert Reviewers
This proposal is for an industry internship lasting the full-time equivalent of 4-5 months and
has been developed by the candidate in collaboration with the Industry Partner and the
Primary Advisor. Your report will be provided to the Candidate to enable them to make
amendments or alterations where required before
the internship commences. Your
identity will be released to the Candidate unless you indicate otherwise.
IN4-FORM-01: RM/RD7004 EXTENDED HDR
INTERNSHIP ASSESSMENT FORM
JCU Graduate Research School (GRS)
CoC-FORM-01 Version 02-2017 Page 24 of 32
This section of the form consists of 7 questions with a rating scale and an area for free
text to provide any feedback and comments. Please complete this section and
return your evaluation to the GRS. Additional pages can be attached if you wish.
The normal period for completion and return of this report is 10 working days. If you
are not able to return the report within this timeframe please notify the GRS.
Any queries regarding the process or the report should be directed to the Graduate
Research School (grs@jcu.edu.au).
Name:
Position
Institution:
Please outline your expertise in the field of the proposal:
Signature:
Date:
☐
I do not wish to have my identity released to the Candidate
(this information will be redacted from the report by the Primary Advisor
before it is provided to the Candidate)
Thank you for providing your review of this Candidate’s research
proposal, your time and input is greatly appreciated.
Review of Proposal
The relevance of the objectives of the proposal to the industry partner is:
☐ Adequate ☐ Inadequate ☐ Partially Adequate – as elaborated in comments below
The critical analysis of the of problem is:
☐ Adequate ☐ Inadequate ☐ Partially Adequate – as elaborated in comments below
The strategy used to search the relevant literature and situate the proposed project is:
☐ Adequate ☐ Inadequate ☐ Partially Adequate – as elaborated in comments below
The proposal is convincing:
☐ Adequate ☐ Inadequate ☐ Partially Adequate – as elaborated in comments below
The clarity of expression and mastery of English in the proposal is:
click to sign
signature
click to edit
CoC-FORM-01 Version 02-2017 Page 25 of 32
☐ Adequate ☐ Inadequate ☐ Partially Adequate – as elaborated in comments below
The proposed project timeline is realistic:
☐ Adequate ☐ Inadequate ☐ Partially Adequate – as elaborated in comments below
The budget is realistic and clearly justified:
☐ Adequate ☐ Inadequate ☐ Partially Adequate – as elaborated in comments below
Comments
Please provide comments and feedback below. If you have indicated ‘Partially
Adequate’ or ‘Inadequate’ - see comments’ please detail your concerns.
Type here (the box will expand ad you type)
Signature of Expert Reviewer
Name
Email Address
Signature
click to sign
signature
click to edit
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

RD7004 Section 1- Proposal Review Form (James Cook University of North Queensland)

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 27 July 2020

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document