1
Institutional Effectiveness Committee
Evaluation and Action Template
Instructions: Please use
this form to capture the annual progress toward the goals outlined in your Committee’s
plan. Cite the data you used in developing/analyzing your plan and any relevant analysis of that data (e.g. upward
or downward trends, performance gaps). Include your committee’s achievements, along with any challenges you
encountered. Analyze and discuss those achievements and challenges. Perhaps most importantly, outline any
changes you have planned, based on your analysis, that you anticipate will lead to improvement in your plan area.
Please return your completed template to Inge.Bond@MissionCollege.edu
Program/Committee:
Plan/Process/Survey Name:
P
lan/Committee Year:
Date(s) of Evaluation:
Data Analyzed:
Analysis Notes:
Institutional Effectiveness Committee
Master Planning and Evaluation Calendar
number of plans evaluated out of all scheduled for evaluation; guided discussion
evaluation at Strategic Planning Summit; iClickers survey data
Sixteen of the 2014-2015 year plans were identified as needing evaluation. Of those, 4
were district-specific so no evaluation was conducted at the college level. Ten
evaluations took place. The remaining two plans will be evaluated when the college
hires a new director in that area.
The iClickers survey revealed that 28% agreed or strongly agreed that they have a
good understanding of the evaluation process for the MPEC. An additional 36% were
neutral on this item, and the remainder disagreed.
The guided evaluation revealed that the MPEC is largely perceived as a useful tool that
was done well although some were still unclear on its purpose, and others expressed
that it needed wider dissemination and use. Respondents commented that it motivated
them to conduct their evaluations, and that it also encouraged them to look at the
timing of those evaluations to be sure that faculty and staff weren't overburdened by
multiple evaluations scheduled simultaneously.
