Fillable NGSS Lesson Screener A Quick Look at Potential (Next Generation Science Standards)

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank NGSS Lesson Screener A Quick Look at Potential (Next Generation Science Standards) Form

Use Fill to complete blank online NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

NGSS Lesson Screener A Quick Look at Potential (Next Generation Science Standards)

On average this form takes 9 minutes to complete

The NGSS Lesson Screener A Quick Look at Potential (Next Generation Science Standards) form is 9 pages long and contains:

  • 0 signatures
  • 36 check-boxes
  • 18 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

Use our library of forms to quickly fill and sign your Next Generation Science Standards forms online.

BROWSE NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
Published December 2016 1
NGSS Lesson Screener
A Quick Look at Potential NGSS Lesson Design
Introduction
The purpose of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lesson Screener is to quickly review a lesson to see: (1) whether a lesson being developed or
revised is on the right track; (2) if a lesson warrants further review using the Educators Evaluating the Quality of Instructional Products (EQuIP) Rubric
for Lessons
& Units: Science (see further detail below); and (3) to what extent a group of reviewers have a common understanding of the NGSS or designing lessons for the
NGSS. There is a recognition among educators that curriculum and instruction will need to shift with the adoption of the NGSS, but it is currently difficult to find
lessons that are truly designed for the NGSS rather than just connecting existing lessons to the standards. The power of the lesson screener is in the productive
conversations educators have while evaluating materials (i.e., the review process). Even with high-quality materials, teachers use their professional judgement in
selecting and shaping lessons in their classrooms. For the purposes of using the lesson screener, a lesson is defined as a coherent set of instructional activities
and assessments that may extend over several class periods or days; it is not just a single activity.
The directions for using the lesson screener assume an understanding of A Framework for K–12 Science Education
and the NGSS, including how the NGSS are
different from past standards as outlined in Appendix A of the NGSS. Some of these “NGSS Shifts” are described in criteria A–C of this tool, whereas criteria D–F
of this tool describe other features of high-quality lesson design. It is also very helpful to be familiar with how each of the three dimensions of the NGSS differ
between grade bands.
Users who are familiar with the EQuIP Rubric will recognize some familiar criteria. However, the NGSS Lesson Screener has fewer criteria because the intended
purpose is different and smaller in scope—it is only for lessons and not for units, and it is not intended to fully evaluate and score lessons. There are significant
aspects of what would be expected in an NGSS-designed lesson that are not addressed in this tool. The lesson screener should not be used to fully vet resources
and its use is not sufficient to claim that the lessons are fully designed for the NGSS. The EQuIP Rubric for Science should be used to evaluate NGSS design for
lessons and units and the Primary Evaluation of Essential Criteria (PEEC)
should be used for evaluating full curricula or instructional materials programs.
Using the NGSS Lesson Screener: A Quick Look at Potential NGSS Design
Providing criterion-based feedback and suggestions for improvement to the developer of the lesson under review is important to the review process. For this
purpose, a set of response forms is included for each category on the following pages. Evidence for each criterion must be identified and documented. In
addition, criterion-based feedback and suggestions for improvement should be given to help improve the lesson.
While it is possible for the rubric to be applied by an individual, the quality review process works best with a team of reviewers as a collaborative process. Just
as when using the full EQuIP Rubric for Science, users should:
1) individually record criterion-based evidence,
2) individually make suggestions for improvement, and then
3) collaboratively discuss findings with team members before checking one of the boxes under the “Evidence of Quality?” column. A rating of
“Adequate” means that the lesson meets the criterion.
Working as a group will not only result in a better lesson, but can also bring the group to a common and deeper understanding of designing lessons for the NGSS.
Published December 2016 2
NGSS Lesson Screener
A Quick Look at Potential NGSS Lesson Design for Instruction and Assessment
The lesson is designed to engage all students in making sense of phenomena and/or designing solutions to problems
through student performances that integrate the three dimensions of the NGSS.
A. Explaining Phenomena or Designing Solutions: The lesson focuses on supporting students to make sense of a phenomenon or
design solutions to a problem.
B. Three Dimensions: The lesson helps students develop and use multiple grade-appropriate elements of the science and engineering
practices (SEPs), disciplinary core ideas (DCIs), and crosscutting concepts (CCCs), which are deliberately selected to aid student
sense-making of phenomena or designing of solutions.
C. Integrating the Three Dimensions for Instruction and Assessment: The lesson requires student performances that integrate
elements of the SEPs, CCCs, and DCIs to make sense of phenomena or design solutions to problems, and the lesson elicits student
artifacts that show direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning.
D. Relevance and Authenticity: The lesson motivates student sense-making or problem-solving by taking advantage of student
questions and prior experiences in the context of the students’ home, neighborhood, and community as appropriate.
E. Student Ideas: The lesson provides opportunities for students to express, clarify, justify, interpret, and represent their ideas (i.e.,
making thinking visible) and to respond to peer and teacher feedback.
F. Building on Students’ Prior Knowledge: The lesson identifies and builds on students’ prior learning in all three dimensions in a way
that is explicit to both the teacher and the students.
NGSS Shifts
Features of Quality Design
Published December 2016 3
Criterion A. Explaining Phenomena or Designing Solutions
1. Learn about the importance of explaining phenomena and designing solutions in lessons designed for the NGSS here:
www.nextgenscience.org/phenomena. Once you are comfortable with the role of explaining phenomena and designing solutions, use the
table below to help gather evidence that either student problem-solving or sense-making of phenomena drives the lesson:
Explaining Phenomena or
Designing Solutions
NGSS designed lessons will look less like this:
NGSS designed lessons will look more like this:
Explaining phenomena and designing solutions are not a part of student
learning or are presented separately from “learning time” (i.e. used only as a
“hook” or engagement tool; used only for enrichment or reward after learning;
only loosely connected to a DCI).
The purpose and focus of the lesson are to support students in making sense of phenomena
and/or designing solutions to problems. The entire lesson drives toward this goal.
The focus is only on getting the “right” answer to explain the phenomenon
Student sense-making of phenomena or designing of solutions is used as a window into
student understanding of all three dimensions of the NGSS.
A different, new, or unrelated phenomenon is used to start every lesson. Lessons work together in a coherent storyline to help students make sense of phenomena.
Teachers tell students about an interesting phenomenon or problem in the
world.
Students get direct (preferably firsthand, or through media representations) experience with
a phenomenon or problem that is relevant to them and is developmentally appropriate.
Phenomena are brought into the lesson after students develop the science ideas
so students can apply what they learned.
The development of science ideas is anchored in explaining phenomena or designing
solutions to problems.
2. Record evidence about how explaining phenomena or designing solutions to problems are represented in the lesson. Describe in the response
form below how this evidence is or is not an adequate indicator the criterion is being met. Include detailed suggestions for improvement.
include clear and compelling
evidence of the following:
What was in the materials, where was it, and
why is this evidence?
Evidence of
Quality?
Suggestions for improvement
A. Explaining Phenomena
or Designing Solutions:
The lesson focuses on
supporting students to
make sense o
f a
p
henomenon or design
solutions to a problem.
☐
None
☐
Inadequate
☐
Adequate
☐
Extensive
3. If you are working in a group, compare lists of evidence and reasoning and come to consensus about whether this lesson met Criterion A.
Published December 2016 4
Criterion B. Three Dimensions
1. Document evidence of specific grade-banded elements* of each dimension—including what evidence was in the lesson, where it occurs,
and why it should be considered to be evidence. To be considered as evidence, it should be clear how the student learning will develop or
apply a specific element in a way that distinguishes it from other grade bands. Use the table below to help gather evidence about how each
dimension is used in this lesson:
* The term “element” indicates the bulleted DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs that are articulated in the foundation boxes of the standards. These elements are summarized in NGSS Appendices F & G
for the SEPs and CCCs and NSTA’s DCI matrix for the DCIs. (Note that NGSS Appendix E contains summaries of the DCIs—not the DCI elements).
Three Dimensions
NGSS designed lessons will look less like this:
NGSS designed lessons will look more like this:
A single practice element shows up in the lesson. The lesson helps students use multiple (e.g., 2–4) practice elements as appropriate in their learning.
The lesson focuses on colloquial definitions of the practice or crosscutting
concept names (e.g., “asking questions”, “cause and effect”) rather than on
grade-appropriate learning goals (e.g., elements in NGSS Appendices F &G).
Specific grade-appropriate elements of SEPs and CCCs (from NGSS Appendices F & G) are acquired,
improved, or used by students to help explain phenomena or solve problems during the lesson.
The SEPs and CCCs can be inferred by the teacher (not necessarily the
students) from the lesson materials.
Students explicitly use the SEP and CCC elements to make sense of the phenomenon or to solve a
problem.
Engineering lessons focus on trial and error activities that don’t require
science or engineering knowledge.
Engineering lessons require students to acquire and use elements of DCIs from physical, life, or Earth and
space sciences together with elements of DCIs from engineering design (ETS) to solve design problems.
2. Record specifically where you find each dimension in the lesson. Describe in the response form below how this evidence is or is not an
adequate indicator the criterion is being met. Include detailed suggestions for improvement.
Lessons designed for the NGSS
include clear and compelling
evidence of the following:
What was in the materials, where was it, and why is this evidence?
Overall
Evidence of
Quality?
Suggestions for improvement
B. Three Dimensions: The
lesson helps students
develop and use multiple
grade-appropriate elements
of the science and
engineering practices
(SEPs), disciplinary core
ideas (DCIs), and
crosscutting concepts
(CCCs) which are
deliberately selected to aid
student sense-making of
phenomena or designing of
solutions.
Document evidence for each dimension.
Evidence?
☐
None
☐
Inadequate
☐
Adequate
☐
Extensive
SEP
☐ None
☐ Inadequate
☐ Adequate
☐ Extensive
DCI
☐ None
☐ Inadequate
☐ Adequate
☐ Extensive
CCC
☐ None
☐ Inadequate
☐ Adequate
☐ Extensive
3. If you are working in a group, compare lists of evidence and reasoning and come to consensus about whether this lesson met Criterion B.
Published December 2016 5
Criterion C. Integrating the Three Dimensions for Instruction and Assessment
1. Learn more about the importance of the three dimensions working together in this brief paper. Then, use your evaluation of the lesson for
criterion B (three dimensions) to examine the lesson for places that students use the three dimensions together to explain a phenomenon or
design a solution to a problem. Use the table below to help gather evidence about three-dimensional learning and assessment in the lesson:
Integrating the Three
Dimensions
NGSS designed lessons will look less like this:
NGSS designed lessons will look more like this:
Students learn the three dimensions in isolation from each other (e.g., a separate
lesson or activity on science methods followed by a later lesson on science
knowledge).
• The lesson is designed to build student proficiency in at least one grade-
appropriate element from each of the three dimensions.
• The three dimensions intentionally work together to help students explain a
phenomenon or design solutions to a problem.
• All three dimensions are necessary for sense-making and problem-solving.
Teachers assume that correct answers indicate student proficiency without the
student providing evidence or reasoning.
Teachers deliberately seek out student artifacts that show direct, observable
evidence of learning, building toward all three dimensions of the NGSS at a
grade-appropriate level.
Teachers measure only one dimension at a time (e.g., separate items for
measuring SEPs, DCIs, and CCCs).
Teachers use tasks that ask students to explain phenomena or design solutions to
problems, and that reveal the level of student proficiency in all three dimensions.
2. Record evidence about how the three dimensions are integrated for instruction and assessment purposes. Describe in the response form below
how this evidence is or is not an adequate indicator the criterion is being met. Include detailed suggestions for improvement.
Lessons designed for the NGSS
include clear and compelling
evidence of the following:
What was in the materials, where was it, and
why is this evidence?
Evidence of
Quality?
Suggestions for improvement
C. Integrating the Three
Dimensions for Instruction
and Assessment: The lesson
requires student performances
that integrate elements of the
SEPs, CCCs, and DCIs to make
sense of phenomena or design
solutions to problems, and the
lesson elicits student artifacts
that show direct, observable
evidence of three-dimensional
learning.
☐
None
☐
Inadequate
☐
Adequate
☐
Extensive
3. If you are working in a group, compare lists of evidence and reasoning and come to consensus about whether this lesson met Criterion C.
Published December 2016 6
Criterion D. Relevance and Authenticity
1. Learn about the importance of making lessons relevant and authentic for all students in NGSS Appendix D. Once you are comfortable with
ideas for making lessons relevant and authentic for all students, examine the lesson through the “lens” of student engagement, and for clear
evidence that the lesson supports connections to students’ lives. Use the table below to help gather evidence about the relevance and
authenticity of the lesson for students:
Relevance and
Authenticity
NGSS designed lessons will look less like this:
NGSS designed lessons will look more like this:
The lesson teaches a topic adults think is important. The lesson motivates student sense-making or problem-solving
The lesson focuses on examples that some of students in the class understand.
The lesson provides support to teachers for making connections to the lives of
every student in the class.
Driving questions are given to students.
Student questions, prior experiences, and diverse backgrounds related to the
phenomenon or problem are used to drive the lesson and the sense-making or
problem-solving.
The lesson tells the students what they will be learning.
The lesson provides support to teachers or students for connecting students’
own questions to the targeted materials.
2. Record evidence about how the lesson is relevant to students and motivates their learning. Describe in the response form below how this
evidence is or is not an adequate indicator the criterion is being met. Include detailed suggestions for improvement.
Lessons designed for the NGSS
include clear and compelling
evidence of the following:
What was in the materials, where was it, and why is this
evidence?
Evidence of
Quality?
Suggestions for improvement
D. Relevance and Authenticity:
The lesson motivates student
sense-making or problem-
solving by taking advantage of
student questions and prior
experiences in the context of
the students’ home,
neighborhood, and
community as appropriate.
☐
None
☐
Inadequate
☐
Adequate
☐
Extensive
3. If you are working in a group, compare lists of evidence and reasoning and come to consensus about whether this lesson met Criterion D.
Published December 2016 7
Criterion E. Student Ideas
1. Examine the lesson for opportunities for all students to communicate their ideas and for the depth to which student ideas are made visible.
Use the table below to help gather evidence about how each dimension is used in this lesson:
Student Ideas
NGSS designed lessons will look less like this:
NGSS designed lessons will look more like this:
The teacher is the central figure in classroom discussions.
•
Classroom discourse focuses on explicitly expressing and clarifying
student reasoning
• Students have opportunities to share ideas and feedback with each other
directly.
Student artifacts only show answers.
Student artifacts include elaborations (which may be written, oral, pictorial,
and kinesthetic) of reasoning behind their answers, and show how students’
thinking has changed over time.
The teacher’s guide focuses on what to tell the students. The lesson provides supports to teachers for eliciting student ideas.
2. Record evidence about how student ideas are elicited from ALL student during the lesson. Describe in the response form below how this
evidence is or is not an adequate indicator the criterion is being met. Include detailed suggestions for improvement.
Lessons designed for the NGSS
include clear and compelling
evidence of the following:
What was in the materials, where was it, and
why is this evidence?
Evidence of
Quality?
Suggestions for improvement
E. Student Ideas: The lesson
provides opportunities for
students to express, clarify,
justify, interpret, and
represent their ideas (i.e.,
making thinking visible) and
to respond to peer and
teacher feedback.
☐
None
☐
Inadequate
☐
Adequate
☐
Extensive
3. If you are working in a group, compare lists of evidence and reasoning and come to consensus about whether this lesson met Criterion E.
Published December 2016 8
Criterion F. Building on Students’ Prior Knowledge
1. Learn about the expected learning progressions of each of the three dimensions in NGSS Appendices E, F, and G. Once you are familiar with
the learning progressions, use the table below to help gather evidence about how the lesson builds on students’ prior learning in each of the
three dimensions:
Building
on
Students' Prior
knowledge
NGSS designed lessons will look less like this:
NGSS designed lessons will look more like this:
The lesson content builds on students’ prior learning, but only for DCIs. The lesson content builds on students’ prior learning in all three dimensions.
The lesson does not include support to teachers for identifying students’ prior
learning.
The lesson provides explicit support to teachers for identifying students’ prior
learning and accommodating different entry points, and describes how the
lesson will build on the prior learning.
The lesson assumes that students are starting from scratch in their
understanding.
The lesson explicitly works together with students’ foundational knowledge
and practice from prior grade levels.
2. Record evidence about how the lesson builds on students’ prior learning. Describe in the response form below how this evidence is or is not
an adequate indicator the criterion is being met. Include detailed suggestions for improvement.
Lessons designed for the NGSS
include clear and compelling
evidence of the following:
What was in the materials, where was it, and
why is this evidence?
Evidence of
Quality?
Suggestions for improvement
F. Building on Students’ Prior
Knowledge: The lesson
identifies and builds on
students’ prior learning in all
three dimensions in a way
that is explicit to both the
teacher and students.
☐
None
☐
Inadequate
☐
Adequate
☐
Extensive
3. If you are working in a group, compare lists of evidence and reasoning and come to consensus about whether this lesson met Criterion F.
Published December 2016 9
NGSS Lesson Screener: A Quick look at NGSS Lesson Design
Reviewer Name or ID: _________________________________ Grade: _________ Lesson/Unit Title: ________________________________________________
Reminder: The purpose of the NGSS Lesson Screener is to give a quick look at a lesson. There are significant aspects of what would be expected in a
fully-vetted NGSS-designed lesson that are not addressed in this tool and it should not be used to fully vet resources or claim that the lessons are
designed for NGSS. Refer to the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units: Science, or the Primary Evaluation of Essential Criteria (PEEC) for full evaluations.
Overall Screening Summary:
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

NGSS Lesson Screener A Quick Look at Potential (Next Generation Science Standards)

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 11 August 2021

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document