Current Challen
I
es
1
organizations. As more scientific research is completed,
Research results from a project report published by the
Aging Wastewater Infrastructure
state and federal agencies continually add requirements
National Water Research Institute on "Source, Fate, and
The cornerstone of municipal wastewater systems is
infrastructure, but it is aging and sometimes stressed by
population growth.There is also the uncertainty of climate
change-related impacts.
To manage the increased wastewater from a population
of 38 million that is projected by the Public Policy Institute
of California to reach 42 million to 48 million people by
2020, wastewater systems and services must expand.
The question, of course, is how to pay for such large but
necessary investments.
Today's Californians are benefiting from local wastewater
systems built during the last century and paid for primar-
ily by federal government funds and grant programs.The
biggest infusion of federal and state funds occurred in the
decade after passing the Clean Water Act in 1972.Current
customer rates and fees reflect those former investments.
According to EPA, treatment plants typically have a use-
ful life of 20 to 50 years before they require expansion or
rehabilitation.Sewer pipes have life cycles that can range
from several decades up to more than 100 years,depend-
ing on the type of material used, where they are located
and how they were installed. EPA has estimated that the
nation must invest $390 billion over the next 20 years to
replace existing wastewater systems and build new ones
to meet increasing demand.
In a similar vein, the American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE) Report Card 2012 reported that the state's
infrastructure investment has not kept up with its
growing population demands and is continuing to delay
much-needed renewal and maintenance.
According to the ASCE Report Card,California's infrastruc-
ture earned an overall grade of"C"and needs an additional
annual investment of $65 billion.The state's wastewater
system infrastructure earned a C+.The annual investment
needed to raise its wastewater infrastructure grade from
a C+ to a B is $4.5 billion annually for the next 10 years,
according to the report card.
To finance the long-overdue capital improvement projects
to upgrade or replace existing wastewater systems, a
number of ideas are being discussed in financial circles.
They include creating a long-term federal financing
source such as a federal clean water trust fund that would
leverage public and private funding for infrastructure
projects, including wastewater systems. Financing from
state and local governments could also come via general
obligation bonds, sales taxes, general tax revenues, or
special assessments. Public-private partnerships are
another option.
Without state and federal funding available, the primary
source of revenues for fixing aging wastewater collection
systems and treatment facilities are the fees charged to
individual ratepayers. Under voter-approved Proposition
218, ratepayer approval is necessary before rates can be
increased to pay for operations or capital improvement
projects. Public rate-setting processes include written
notices, known as Proposition 218 notices, and public
hearings. Because municipal wastewater agencies are
governed by city councils, county boards of supervisors
or elected boards, their meetings are always open to the
public, with opportunities available for providing com-
ments. Many agency documents, reports and contracts
are available to the public also.
Constituents of Emerging Concern
A topic in and out of the news and on the minds of
the public is the presence of constituents of emerging
concern (CECs) in water bodies, including wastewater
effluent, which can now be detected by advanced
scientific testing. CECs, a broad and generic term, are
also referred to as emerging constituents, endocrine-
disru pting chemicals (EDCs) or pharmaceuticals and
personal care products. They are also called non-
traditional pollutants.
CECs can be categorized into the following groups:
synthetically and naturally occurring hormones; personal
care products; pharmaceutically active compounds;
pesticides, herbicides and insecticides; industrial and
household chemicals; disinfection by-products; and
metals.
Although they are not directly regulated by the state or
federal government, CECs have the attention of the State
Water Board, which has adopted an amendment to its
Recycled Water Policy related to CECs. Some individual
discharge permits also require monitoring of CECs.
Research and studies continue on CEC issues, including
occurrence;effects on people,animals,aquatic life and the
environmentand treatment methods, by the wastewater
community and state and federal government,along with
other entities such as statewide and national wastewater
to address contaminants when they are proven to be
harmful.
According to the Bureau of Reclamation's "Secondary/
Emerging Constituents Report" (2009), "approximately
87,000 emerging compounds have been identified as
possible EDCs (EPA, 2008)." In its conclusion, the report
explained that, "CECs are diverse compounds whose
characteristics vary even within the same subcategory."
Among the report's recommendations were that
consideration should be given to the following: "The
willingness of the public to pay for potentially costly
mitigation efforts;the importance of CECs in surface water
and drinking water relative to other public health and
environmental concerns; and the potential loss or gain
related to waiting for more information or taking action
despite uncertainties regarding CECs."
Climate Change
According to EPA's Climate Change Basics website,
(www.epa.gov/climatechange/basics),
climate change
"refers to any significant change in the measures of
climate lasting for an extended period of time. In other
words, climate change includes major changes in tem-
perature, precipitation or wind patterns, among other
effects, that occur over several decades or longer."
Breaking down the definition,EPA identifies global warm-
ing as the "recent and ongoing rise in global average
temperature near earth's surface. ... However, global
warming itself represents only one aspect of climate
change."
Impacts that climate change could have on wastewater
and drinking water utilities were detailed in a 104-page
report, "Confronting Climate Change: an Early Analysis
of Water and Wastewater Adaptation Costs," released in
October 2009 by the National Association of Clean Water
Agencies and the Association of the Metropolitan Water
Agencies, prepared by CH2M Hill. The report estimated
the adaptation costs for those facilities could range from
$448 billion to $944 billion through 2050.
"Climate change will impact wastewater utilities on a
number of fronts," the report said. Among the climate-
related challenges addressed in the report were extreme
storm events and overall precipitation increases;the need
for additional flood protection measures such as levees,
seawalls and pumping; and wastewater cooling systems
to protect fisheries due to increased temperatures.
Transport of Endocrine Disruptors, Pharmaceuticals,
and Personal Care Products in Drinking Water Sources
in California" will be used to better assess any potential
health and environmental impacts of CECs.
According to the report,"The total estimated Net Present
Value (NPV) cost of wastewater system climate change
adaptation in the U.S. is between $123 billion and $252
billion above and beyond existing wastewater system
infrastructure upgrade, renewal and replacement pro-
grams that EPA estimates to be between $300 billion and
$500 billion for combined drinking water and wastewater
for the 2007-2027 period.The NPV early estimate includes
both capital and O&M cost estimates."
Wastewater agencies across the state are improving the
energy efficiency of their operations to reduce demands
on fossil fuel energy sources,producing renewable energy
using biogas, solar and wind, and reducing their green-
house gas emissions.They are also developing strategies
to adapt to expected changes in climate.
Among the green efforts agencies are encompassing
include converting from gasoline-fueled vehicle fleets to
cleaner burning, lower emission alternative fuel vehicles
and changing to solar panel installations to generate
electricity.
The California Wastewater Climate Change Group has
for the past several years led an effort for science-based,
cost-effective climate change solutions and served as
a resource for wastewater agencies on climate change
issues. It is a collaboration of the California Association
of Sanitation Agencies, Bay Area Clean Water Agencies,
Central Valley Clean Water Association and Southern
California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
Wastewater agencies operate
laboratories that constantly
monitor wastewater as
it undergoes treatment
processes.
18
19