Incident Management Team Performance Evaluation
Team IC Incident Type
Incident Name Incident Number
Assignment Dates Total Acres
Host Agency Evaluation Date
Administrative Unit Sub-Unit
At the conclusion of each incident management team (IMT) assignment, the agency
administrator or representative should complete this initial performance evaluation (sections 1 –
5). This evaluation should be discussed directly with the incident commander. The initial
performance evaluation should be delivered by the agency administrator without delay to the
incident commander, the state/regional fire management officer, and the chair of the IMT’s home
geographic area multi-agency coordination group to ensure prompt follow-up to any issues of
concern.
Complete the following evaluation narratives and rating for each question.
0 – did not achieve expectations 3 – met expectations 5 – excelled
1. How well did the team accomplish the objectives described in the Wildland Fire Decision
Support System (WFDSS) the Delegation of Authority, and the Agency Administrator
Briefing?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
2. How well did the team manage the cost of the incident? Did the team follow agency incident
operating guidelines? Were follow-up issues (e.g., invoices, OWCP and vendor issues)
identified and documented for the Agency Administrator?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
Release Date: January 2021
3. How did the team demonstrate sensitivity to resource limits/constraints and environmental
concerns?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
4. How well did the team deal with sensitive political and social concerns?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
5. Was the team professional in the manner in which they assumed management of the incident
and how they managed the total incident? How did the team handle transition either to
another IMT or in returning the incident the hosting agency?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
6. How well did the team anticipate and respond to changing conditions, was the response
timely and effective?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
7. How well did the team place the proper emphasis on safety?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
Release Date: January 2021
8. Did the team activate and manage the mobilization/demobilization in a timely and cost
effective manner?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
9. How well did the team use local resources, trainees, and closest available forces?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
10. How did the team notify the incident agency regarding triggers for initiating a cost share
agreement or Continuous Improvement Assessment (FS)/Significant Wildland Fire Review
(DOI)? How were those recommendations implemented?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
11. Was the IC engaged and in charge of the team and the tncident? How well did the IC
function and operate as a leader?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
Release Date: January 2021
12. How timely was the IC in assuming responsibility for the incident and initiating action?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
13. How did the IC show sincere concern and empathy for the hosting unit and local conditions?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
14. Did the IMT provide an organized financial package (comps/claims documentation
completed, payment documents forwarded, I-suite updated, etc.) to the host unit or next IMT
prior to demobilization?
Check one 0 1 2 3 4 5
(Explain)
15. Other comments:
Agency Administrator
or Representative:
Date:
Incident Commander: Date:
Release Date: January 2021