Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
8 Brunswick Road Troy, New York 12180
Phone: (518) 270-5920 Fax: (518) 270-5922
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT, LLC
Rensselaer (Riverside Avenue) Plant
Port of Rensselaer, City of Rensselaer, Rensselaer County, New York
APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF BLACKTOP PLANT
Prepared by: Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
Date: May 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................1
1.2 Location .................................................................................................................................1
1.3 Ownership..............................................................................................................................1
2.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Topography............................................................................................................................3
3.2 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................3
3.3 Railroad Spur .........................................................................................................................3
3.4 Utilities...................................................................................................................................3
3.5 Access ....................................................................................................................................3
3.6 Floodplain ..............................................................................................................................3
3.7 Future Bike Path ....................................................................................................................4
4.0 DESCRIPTON OF PROPOSED OPERATIONS ..................................................................... 4
4.1 Proposed Access and Traffic Flow ........................................................................................4
4.2 Access Control.......................................................................................................................4
4.3 Truck Routes..........................................................................................................................5
4.4 Blacktop Plant Components and Layout................................................................................5
4.5 Stockpile Area........................................................................................................................6
4.6 Stormwater Management Area ..............................................................................................7
4.7 Parking...................................................................................................................................7
4.8 Lighting..................................................................................................................................7
4.9 Truck Loading Areas .............................................................................................................7
4.10 Equipment Operation...........................................................................................................7
4.11 Water Supply .......................................................................................................................7
4.12 Natural Gas ..........................................................................................................................8
4.13 Electricity.............................................................................................................................8
4.14 Sewage.................................................................................................................................8
4.15 Buffer Zones and Green Space ............................................................................................8
4.16 Landscaping .........................................................................................................................8
4.17 Signs.....................................................................................................................................8
4.18 Pedestrian Access.................................................................................................................8
5.0 APPROVALS............................................................................................................................ 8
6.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION....................................................................... 9
6.1 Potential Air Impacts ...........................................................................................................10
6.2 Traffic ..................................................................................................................................11
6.3 Visual...................................................................................................................................11
6.4 Proposed Bike Path..............................................................................................................11
6.5 Noise ....................................................................................................................................11
6.5.1 Expected Sound Level at Riverside Avenue................................................................ 13
6.5.2 Expected Sound Level at Port Expressway ................................................................. 13
6.5.3 Expected Sound Level at Residential Area.................................................................. 13
6.5.4 Expected Sound Level at Overlook Area..................................................................... 13
6.5.5 Recommended Noise Best Management Practices...................................................... 13
6.5.6 Noise Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 14
6.6 Floodplain ............................................................................................................................14
6.7 Stormwater...........................................................................................................................14
6.8 Groundwater ........................................................................................................................15
6.9 Plants and Wildlife...............................................................................................................15
6.10 Cultural Resources.............................................................................................................17
6.11 Energy Use.........................................................................................................................17
6.12 Odor and Light...................................................................................................................18
6.13 Human Health ....................................................................................................................18
6.14 Community Character........................................................................................................18
Appendix
Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1
Visual Impact Assessment dated May 2011
May 9, 2011 Letter to Sarah Crowell
Request for Site Plan Review and Special Use Permit Approval
February 15, 2011 Letter to Building and Zoning Administrator
Floodplain Development Permit Application
Creighton Manning Traffic Studies dated March 2, 2011 and May 17, 2011
Cultural Resources Investigation
NYSDEC Air Registration Application
Stockpile Maintenance Plan dated February 15, 2011
Fugitive Dust Control Plan dated May 31, 2011
(Bound Drawings)—full size and 11” x 17”
Site Plan Map (Existing Conditions) dated May 31, 2011
Site Plan Map (Proposed Conditions) dated May 31, 2011
Details dated January 14, 2011 (Two Sheets)
NOTE: ALL OVERSIZED DRAWINGS IN SEPARATE FILE
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This report describes the proposed construction and operation of New Castle Asphalt, LLC’s
(“New Castle”) blacktop plant on the west side of Riverside Avenue in the Port of Rensselaer.
The report and accompanying Site Plan is provided as part of the application for Site Plan Review
and a Special Use Permit from the City of Rensselaer.
1.2 Location
The site is located on the west side of Riverside Avenue and to the north of the Irwin Stewart Port
Expressway (“Port Expressway”), as shown on the Location Map on the next page. The site is
accessed from U.S. Route 20 via the Port Expressway.
The site is located in the City of Rensselaer Industrial Zoning District and is in the active Port of
Albany-Rensselaer. The site is surrounded by existing heavy industrial activities including but not
limited to:
The Besicorp-Empire Power Generation Plant (to the northeast and east);
The Fulton Cogeneration Associates Power Cogeneration Plant (to the north)
A large-scale scrap-metal crusher and export operation (to the northwest); and
Several active petroleum bulk storage and distribution facilities (to the south), the
closest being the Getty Terminal Facility (see map on page 2) and Polsinello Fuels.
In addition, the land west of the site (across and on the west side of the Hudson River) is occupied
by a variety of heavy industrial activities in the Port of Albany-Rensselaer.
The site is well suited for the proposed project. The proposed 400 ton per hour blacktop plant
will assimilate well into the surrounding heavy industrial activities and will not cause any
significant contrast to the industrial character of the zoning district. All potentially sensitive
receptors are separated from this site by intervening heavy industrial activity. The distances
between the nearest potential receptors are:
Ft. Crailo—approximately 3700 feet north of site
Ball Field—approximately 3300 feet north of site
Educational facility—SUNY facility on US Route 20—approximately 2600 feet
Nearest residential area to the north—approximately 3300 feet
Nearest residence in primarily commercial area east of site—approximately 1400 feet
Nearest residential area—approximately 1800 feet east of site.
1.3 Ownership
The site is owned by the Albany-Rensselaer Port District Commission and is leased to the
applicant, New Castle Asphalt, LLC. It is located on Tax Parcel 154-5-3.
2.0 PURPOSE
The proposed plant will provide blacktop for use in the construction and maintenance of roads,
driveways, parking lots and sidewalks. Currently, the nearest blacktop plants are located in South
Troy (Callanan), West Sand Lake (Troy Sand & Gravel), the Port of Albany (Albany Asphalt)
and Watervliet (Callanan). Blacktop for construction must be hauled from these more distant
locations at greater expense to individuals, private developers and governmental agencies. In
addition, hauling from more distant locations puts increased strain on the local highway
infrastructure.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
3
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Topography
The attached Site Plan Map (Existing Conditions) shows the existing conditions of the site. In
general, the site grades gently from an approximate high elevation of 26 feet above mean sea
level at the top of the bank along the Hudson River down to an elevation of approximately 18 feet
along an active railroad spur on the east side of the property. The easternmost part of the side
grades up slightly (elevation 19 feet) towards Riverside Avenue.
The property narrows in its southwest portion near the 90 degree turn in Riverside Avenue to the
southwest of the site. This part of the property grades to the steep bank of the Hudson River.
3.2 Vegetation
The site was formerly used as a lay down and parking area for the construction of the adjacent
plant. Most of the proposed site (approximately 4.6 acres) is covered by a layer of crushed stone.
A secondary growth of mixed trees and brush covers the western and northern perimeters of the
property. The remainder of the site is covered by open grasslands.
3.3 Railroad Spur
A single line railroad spur exists along the northeast and eastern parts of the property. This spur
is not proposed to be used by the applicant but is used by the adjacent metal salvage operation.
3.4 Utilities
Eight and 12 inch diameter water lines exist along Riverside Avenue on the east side of the site.
The water lines along the Port Expressway on the south side of the site are six inches and 12
inches in diameter. These lines and related water features are shown on the Site Plan Map
(Existing Conditions).
The stormwater pipes and related features run along Riverside Avenue, as shown on the Site Plan
Map (Existing Conditions). The lines are 12 inches in diameter. A 36 inch diameter storm pipe
water collector runs across the southwest part of the site through the NYSDOT stormwater
easement.
The site is lit by a handful of pole-mounted lights in the center of the property, left over from the
site’s prior use. The poles are approximately 25 feet high and are guarded by concrete blocks.
Overhead electrical and phone lines run along the west and south sides of Riverside Avenue, as
shown on the Site Plan Map (Existing Conditions). A power transmission line from the adjacent
cogeneration plant runs north-south and then east-west across the northeast part of the site.
A gas delivery line and commercial gas service point exists along the east side of Riverside
Drive.
3.5 Access
Two unpaved access points along the south side of the site provide access to Riverside Avenue at
the locations shown on the Site Plan Map (Existing Conditions).
3.6 Floodplain
The FEMA floodplain maps indicate the elevation of the 100-year floodplain ranges from about
19 feet to the south of the site to about 20 feet to the north of the site. The majority of the site is
above these elevations; only a portion of the railroad spur and the eastern side of the site are
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
4
below the 19 to 20 foot elevation. Riverside Avenue and a part of the Port Expressway southeast
of the site is below this elevation.
3.7 Future Bike Path
A bike path has been proposed by Empire-Besicorp to be built along Riverside Avenue, east and
south of the site. The bike path through the industrial area will terminate at an overlook area to
the southwest of the site, overlooking the Hudson River and the industrial Port of Albany-
Rensselaer.
4.0 DESCRIPTON OF PROPOSED OPERATIONS
The general operations of the proposed blacktop plant are described below.
4.1 Proposed Access and Traffic Flow
All vehicles will access the site via the proposed entrance from Riverside Avenue in the southeast
part of the site. This proposed entrance is at the location of one the existing access points. All
vehicles will travel north on the entrance road along the east side of the site. Trucks delivering
recycled asphalt pavement (“RAP”) and aggregates will turn left into the Stockpile Area, deposit
their materials at the appropriate stockpile, travel west across the Stockpile Area to the perimeter
access road, turn left (south) and depart the site.
Employees, liquid asphalt and delivery trucks and trucks picking up blacktop will proceed north
along the entrance road along the east side of the site to the Plant Area. Employees will park in
the two parking areas near the plant or the lab and depart via the perimeter access road along the
west side of the site.
Liquid asphalt and delivery trucks will use the road that bypasses the blacktop plant, take a left
turn just north of the plant, deliver their materials to the bulk storage from the concrete pad,
proceed southwest to the perimeter access road, turn left (south) and depart the site via Riverside
Avenue to the Port Expressway.
Trucks picking up blacktop will proceed north along the entrance road along the east side of the
site, turn left into the Plant Area, wait until signaled to pull under the plant discharge and hot
silos, receive their load of blacktop, pull out from beneath the plant heading north, turn left (west)
onto the perimeter access road, go around the north side of the lab and proceed south to the site
exit onto the Port Expressway.
Overall, the flow of traffic on the entrance road/perimeter access road will be one-way in a
counter-clockwise direction.
Two rollover curbs will be placed in the entrance/perimeter access road to contain stormwater on
site. The rollover curb is a surface water divide in the road that on one side directs stormwater
back towards the interior of the site and on the other keeps stormwater from entering the site.
The entrance/perimeter access road will be paved. Details of the road construction are shown on
the Detail Sheets.
4.2 Access Control
Access to the site will be controlled by perimeter berms and the gates on the entrance
road/perimeter access road, as shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed Conditions). The gates’
typical construction is shown on the Details Sheets.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
5
4.3 Truck Routes
Employee vehicles and most delivery trucks will travel south and west on the Port Expressway to
Riverside Avenue to access the site. The nearest liquid asphalt distributor is Gorman Brothers,
located further south of the site in the Port of Rensselaer, so it is expected that liquid asphalt
deliveries will come via Riverside Avenue from the south.
Trucks leaving the Port of Rensselaer from this site will use NYS Route 9J and US Route 20.
The potential impact of project generated traffic is assessed in the Traffic Study prepared by
Creighton Manning Engineers. No significant impact is expected since the trucks will use
designated truck routes designed to carry truck traffic before exiting onto state or federal
highways intended for truck traffic.
4.4 Blacktop Plant Components and Layout
The proposed blacktop plant will be a drum mix plant. The plant will mix coarse aggregate
(crushed stone), sand and liquid asphalt to produce blacktop. Drum mix plants produce one type
of blacktop at a time in a continuous feed as compared to batch plants that can make a different
batch of blacktop for each “batch”. Drum mix plants are becoming more common than batch
plants because they are more efficient, employ superior emission control technology and produce
a generally more uniform and higher quality product.
The blacktop plant consists of various components, all necessary for its efficient operation. These
components are:
Cold feed bins—Aggregates at ambient temperatures (hence the term “cold”) are
loaded into these bins, metered out through the bottom onto a conveyor that delivers
the aggregates to the drum. A screen removes potential clumps in the aggregate
before it enters the drum.
RAP bins—RAP is loaded into bins, crushed to size in a single pass, metered out
through the bottom onto a conveyor that delivers the aggregates to the drum. The
RAP is fed into the drum mixing zone as a means of controlling blue smoke. A
screen removes potential clumps in the RAP before it enters the drum.
Drum—The drum is a near horizontally oriented cylinder that slowly rotates.
Aggregates are fed into the drum and heated by a low NO
x
emissions burner which
dries the aggregates and heats them to the temperature of the liquid asphalt,
promoting better adhesion and a more durable blacktop. The drum uses counterflow
technology which means the aggregate moves in the opposite direction of the heat
from the burner. Aggregate moves through the center of the drum and is heated
while the RAP is introduced into an isolated mixing chamber behind the burner.
Flights inside the drum keep the RAP flowing along the exterior of the drum where it
is subject to less heat. These technologies control odors and blue smoke. Liquid
asphalt is metered into the drum in the mixing area before the aggregate/RAP/liquid
asphalt mixture is removed from the drum via hot mix conveyor to the hot storage
silos and discharge area.
Hot Storage Silos/Discharge Area—Trucks pull onto one of the two scales under the
silos and discharge area to be loaded. The appropriate mix is dropped via chute into
the waiting truck. When full, the truck pulls out, trims, picks up a ticket at the
control room, covers the blacktop at the truck rack and leaves the site. Since a drum
plant produces one mix at a time, the hot storage silos serve the purpose of holding
and discharging multiple mixes and providing surge storage. The use of silos tends
to even out the flow of traffic. The silos are heated to keep the blacktop from
hardening.
Baghouse—One of the most noticeable and largest components of the blacktop plant
are the emission control features, including the baghouse. The emissions from the
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
6
drum are collected by a positive reclaim system and fed back in a closed loop to the
burner for ignition to prevent blue smoke and odors. The exhaust emissions are fed
by enclosed duct to the baghouse. Oversized particles are removed at the entrance to
the baghouse and the air is circulated in a circuitous path through the hanging bags.
Particulates adhere to and drop from the bags and are collected by a screw conveyor
that moves the dust to a collection silo. The collection silo is periodically emptied
and stored on site. The baghouse removes approximately 99.94 percent of particulate
matter and modern blacktop plants are minor sources of dust. Most of the dust is re-
incorporated into the blacktop.
Control Room— The plant is highly automated with the controls located in this room.
The plant operator works in this room, sets the plant to produce the desired mixes and
prints the ticket for each load
Liquid Storage—Liquids used in the manufacture of blacktop and maintenance of the
plant are stored in the area northwest of the drum. These tanks are located within
impermeable secondary containment. Trucks delivering these fluids park on an
impermeable concrete pad.
Lab—Routine labs tests required by specifying agencies are performed in the lab.
This testing ensures that high quality blacktop is produced.
Spray Bars and Truck Racks—Automated spray bars spray the bed of blacktop trucks
to prevent blacktop from sticking. This process is automated and controlled by the
plant operator to prevent truck drivers from over application and subsequent leakage.
The truck racks after the plant allow truck drivers to trim and cover the blacktop prior
to leaving the site. The spray bars are located on an impermeable pad.
The locations, sizes and heights of the buildings and necessary structures are shown on the Site
Plan Map (Proposed Conditions). The tallest buildings are the fuel and additive storage buildings
which will be approximately 18 feet high. The hot storage silos are the tallest structures and will
be approximately 66 feet high with necessary appurtenances (e.g. blacktop elevator) that are
approximately 84 feet high. The City ordinance applies to buildings and allows necessary
structures (such as elevators) to be up to 87.5 feet high.
4.5 Stockpile Area
Aggregate and RAP will be hauled to the site in tri-axle dump trucks (22 ton loads) and trailer
dump (34 ton loads) trucks. The aggregates and RAP that make up the bulk of the blacktop will
be stored in open piles in the Stockpile Area in the southern part of the property. The Stockpile
Area will be bermed along its perimeter and graded to direct stormwater towards the stormwater
management area.
The floor of the Stockpile Area will be covered with crushed stone.
The size and location of the stockpiles will vary over time as materials will be delivered and fed
to the plant and different aggregates will be needed for different types of blacktop. In general, it
is anticipated that the aggregates will consist of different sizes of crushed stone (e.g. NYSDOT
#3, #2, #1, #1A, Screenings, Natural Sand) so it’s not possible to state how much of each product
will be on site at any time. The height of the stockpiles will be approximately 20 feet or less.
RAP will also be stored in the Stockpile Area. RAP from milled up roads will be re-used in the
blacktop, thereby reducing the need to landfill, reducing the amount of aggregates needed, and
reducing the amount of fuel and asphalt needed.
Aggregates and RAP will be excavated from the piles by a rubber tired front end loader and fed to
the cold feed and RAP bins, respectively.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
7
4.6 Stormwater Management Area
Currently, stormwater drains towards the railroad spur along the east side of the site. Water
collects along the railroad spur and infiltrates or overflows the area, entering the existing
stormwater system along Riverside Avenue near its intersection with the Port Expressway.
The perimeter of the site will be bermed to prevent runon into the site and keep runoff from
leaving disturbed areas of the site. Rollover curbs will be placed on the perimeter access road to
keep the site drainage internal and prevent runon to the site.
Runoff from the Stockpile and Plant Areas will be directed to the Stormwater Management Area
(“SMA”) in the east-center of the site. The runoff will enter a stone-lined ditch along the west
and north sides of the SMA. The ditch will empty into a sediment trap which will empty into a
detention pond. Water will be treated in this system prior to being discharged into the same
stormwater system that currently receives the site’s runoff.
4.7 Parking
Approximately six people will be employed at the site. Off-street parking for 15 has been
provided: three spots by the lab and 12 spots by the plant.
4.8 Lighting
NYSDOT, the Thruway Authority and other specifying agencies periodically require that roads
be paved at night for the convenience of the motoring public. The adjacent power plants operate
at night also. Therefore, the site will be equipped with lights for required night time operations.
The existing lighting will be kept in place as much as possible. The Stockpile Area will be lit by
two of the existing pole mounted lights. The pole in the southern part of the Stockpile Area will
be moved a few feet to the southeast to avoid areas frequented by equipment.
The cold feed bins and RAP bins will be lit by another of the existing pole mounted lights.
The Plant Area will be illuminated by hooded lights mounted on the plant and related structures.
The locations of the existing and proposed lights are shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed
Conditions).
4.9 Truck Loading Areas
Trucks will be loaded with blacktop under the hot storage silos, described in Section 4.4 above.
4.10 Equipment Operation
Heavy equipment will be used as needed to operate the site. Rubber tired front end loaders will
operate in the Stockpile Area to feed RAP and aggregates to the blacktop plant. A small skid
steer will be used to clean up loose debris, mainly in the Plant Area. A small off-road truck will
move material around the site on an infrequent basis. An excavator will be used to clean out
stormwater features for a few days per year. On road trucks will deliver aggregates (primarily
trailer dumps), deliver RAP (a mix of tri-axle dumps and trailer dumps) and pick up blacktop
(primarily tri-axle dumps).
4.11 Water Supply
Water service will be obtained by tying into the existing City water lines. The City of Rensselaer
Water Department indicated there is sufficient pressure and supply for the limited water use
expected at the site.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
8
4.12 Natural Gas
The burner on the drum will be fueled by natural gas, used oil or fuel oil. A gas service exists on
the east side of Riverside Avenue. The utility company has been contacted regarding tying into
this service. The proposed tie-in is shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed Conditions).
4.13 Electricity
The remaining fixed equipment at the site will be powered by electricity. Electrical service exists
along Riverside Avenue adjacent to the site. The utility company has been contacted regarding
tying into this service. The proposed tie-in is shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed Conditions).
4.14 Sewage
According to Rensselaer County and the City, there is no sewer service near the site. An on-site
septic system will be constructed in the northeast part of the site, as shown on the Site Plan Map
(Proposed Conditions). The septic leach field will likely be raised bed above the elevation of the
100-year floodplain and designed and built in accordance with the County Department of Health
requirements.
4.15 Buffer Zones and Green Space
The site covers approximately 12.4 acres, of which 5.8 acres will be used by the blacktop plant,
roads, stockpile area and related features. Another 0.8 acres is covered by the stormwater
management area. Approximately 53 percent of the site will remain as green space.
4.16 Landscaping
The site is zoned industrial and is located in the center of the Port of Rensselaer surrounded by
heavy industrial uses, including a metal salvage yard, a cogeneration plant, a power plant, large
fuel storage facilities and the industrial Port of Albany across the Hudson River. The details of
revegetating disturbed areas such as perimeter berms are described in Section 3.1.3 of the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”).
4.17 Signs
The proposed signs for the exterior of the site are shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed
Conditions) and the Detail Sheets. The signs will include:
A sign at the entrance to identify the site
A “Do Not Enter” sign at the exit (since the perimeter road is one way)
Bicycle crossing signs at the points where the proposed bike path crosses the
entrance/perimeter access road
A stop sign at the exit
Additional signs will be used on site to direct traffic, limit speed, notify truck drivers to cover
loads and other purposes for the safe and efficient operation of the site. These signs will be
internal to the site.
4.18 Pedestrian Access
No pedestrian access to the site is required or proposed.
5.0 APPROVALS
The following approvals are required to begin construction of the site:
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
9
Special Use Permit from the City of Rensselaer—the site is located within the
Floodplain Overlay, although the elevation of most of the site is above the 100-year
floodplain elevation of approximately 19 to 20 feet.
Site Plan Review by the City of Rensselaer
Floodplain Development Permit Application by the City of Rensselaer
Construction SWPPP for the City of Rensselaer—addresses stormwater and sediment
control during the construction of the site
NYSDEC Air Registration
Rensselaer County Health Department approval of septic system—to be obtained
once City site plan approval has been obtained;
In addition, the following plans will be required after the above approvals are granted:
NYSDEC Multi-Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities—this is a general
permit that requires submission (30 days prior to beginning operation of the blacktop
plant) of a Notice of Intent and preparation of a SWPPP for the post-construction (i.e.
blacktop plant) activities at the site. This plan is kept on-site and does not require
regulatory review.
EPA Spill Prevention and Countermeasure Plan (“SPCC”)—this plan describes the
efforts to prevent, control and clean up potential spills at the site. It is required to be
prepared and implemented within the first six months of the site’s operation and does
not require regulatory review.
NYSDEC Petroleum Bulk Storage Registration—all bulk storage will be done in
accordance with applicable NYSDEC requirements. The Site Plan accounts for
required impermeable pads and impermeable secondary containment. The
registration will be obtained from NYSDEC once the bulk storage is purchased.
The information in this application duplicates the information that would be included in the two
above plans.
6.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION
The site is located in the City of Rensselaer Industrial Zoning District and is in the active Port of
Albany-Rensselaer. The site is surrounded by existing heavy industrial activities including but not
limited to:
The Besicorp-Empire Power Generation Plant;
The Fulton Cogeneration Associates Power Cogeneration Plant
A large-scale scrap-metal crusher and export operation; and
Several active petroleum bulk storage and distribution facilities, the closest being the
Getty Terminal Facility and Polsinello Fuels (see Location Map on page 2).
In addition, the land west of the site (across and on the west side of the Hudson River) is occupied
by a variety of heavy industrial activities in the Port of Albany-Rensselaer.
This is an ideal location for a blacktop plant. The proposed blacktop plant will assimilate well
into the surrounding heavy industrial activities and will not cause any significant contrast to the
industrial character of the zoning district. All potential sensitive receptors are separated from this
site by intervening heavy industrial activity. The distances between the nearest potential
receptors are:
Ft. Crailo—approximately 3700 feet north of site
Ball Field—approximately 3300 feet north of site
Educational facility—SUNY facility on US Route 20—approximately 2600 feet
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
10
Nearest residential area to the north—approximately 3300 feet
Nearest residence in primarily commercial area east of site—approximately 1400 feet
Nearest residential area—approximately 1800 feet east of site.
The potential impacts of the proposed project are described below and in the May 9, 2011 letter to
Sarah Crowell in the Appendix.
6.1 Potential Air Impacts
A blacktop plant operated on line power, as proposed, is a minor source of emissions. The
proposed plant has been capped out by rule (limiting the amount of emissions) and only requires
an air registration from NYSDEC. There are six reported Title V facilities near the site, five in
the Port of Rensselaer and one on US Route 20 just north of the site. Title V facilities produce
emissions that are each at least 10 times more than the emissions proposed from this site during a
busy year.
The proposed emissions controls were described above in Section 4.4 and are summarized below.
These technologies will control dust and other emissions from the site.
Counterflow and internal flight technology in the drum limits the liquid asphalt
exposure to the high temperatures needed to dry the aggregate;
RAP is fed into the drum mixing chamber behind the burner, limiting the exposure of
the asphalt to the high temperatures needed to dry the aggregate;
Fumes from the drum are captured and fed via closed duct to the burner where they
are burned
Captured air is vented through the baghouse which removes approximately 99.94
percent of particulate matter
Further, measures are taken to control the moisture of the aggregate and RAP stockpiles (see
Stockpile Maintenance Plan in the Appendix). Drier aggregate requires less fuel consumption
and produces fewer emissions.
Fugitive dust will be controlled via best management practices outlined in the Fugitive Dust
Control Plan in the Appendix.
The project will not emit 1000 tons per year of carbon dioxide, 3.5 tons per year of nitrous oxide,
1000 tons per year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons, 0.045 tons per year of sulfur
hexafluoride, more than 1000 tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent
hydrochlorofluorcarbons, 43 tons per year of methane, 10 tons per year of any one designated
hazardous air pollutant (HAP) or 25 tons per year of any combination of HAP, does not have an
emission rate or more than 5 pounds per hour, will not produce more than 10 million BTUs per
hour and will not use more than 2500 MW hours of electricity per year and will not exceed 50%
of any of the two emission thresholds.
An air permit registration was submitted to NYSDEC, the recognized authority on air approvals.
NYSDEC indicated the air registration is not subject to public review because it is a minor source
that requires only an air registration, the lowest form of approval granted by NYSDEC (see chart
on following page describing the various levels of air approvals). Blacktop plants have high
degrees of emission control and are small sources of emissions. The fact that the proposed plant
requires an air registration from NYSDEC is proof that it is not
a significant source of air
emissions.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
11
The minor nature of the emissions from this facility combined with the proposed emission control
technology and best management practices will ensure that this site will not have a significant
impact on air quality and not generate blue smoke or offensive odors.
6.2 Traffic
The potential impact of project-generated traffic is assessed in the Traffic Study and
Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared by Creighton Manning Engineers. These studies were
submitted under separate cover and are included in the Appendix.
6.3 Visual
A Visual Impact Assessment was done in accordance with the NYSDEC Visual Policy. This
study is in the Appendix.
The site is located in an industrially zoned area in the center of the Port of Rensselaer, surrounded
by heavy industrial uses. The industrial activities at the site are located as far from Riverside
Avenue and the Port Expressway as possible and perimeter berms and large green spaces
(approximately 53 percent of the site) are located along the parts of the site most visible from
these roads. The visual character of the site will be consistent with the zoning and surrounding
land-uses and there are no potential residential receptors near the site. No significant visual
impacts will occur.
6.4 Proposed Bike Path
As part of a prior approval of the cogeneration plant, a bike path is proposed to be built along
Riverside Avenue and the Port Expressway, ending in an overlook area along the southwest side
of the site. The bike path winds through a heavy industrial area and the overlook area will have a
tree obscured vista of a portion of the industrial Port of Albany.
The bike path will cross the entrance and exit. Striping and signage will be placed at these
locations sufficient to alert vehicles and bicyclists.
The vegetated perimeter berms between the site and proposed bike path and overlook area will
provide screening. However, the proposed site is consistent with the surrounding industrial land-
uses so there will be no significant impacts to the bike path or overlook area.
6.5 Noise
The area surrounding the site is industrial in nature and potential sensitive receptors are not
located proximal to the site. To determine compliance with the noise provisions of the City
ordinance and to assess potential impacts to receptors as per the State Environmental Quality
Review Act (SEQRA), the following work was performed:
We familiarized ourselves with the nature of the community, and identified potential
receptors, existing noise sources and representative ambient monitoring locations
We monitored ambient sound levels at the chosen locations on Riverside Avenue, the
Port Expressway and the residential area to the east of site (see map on page 2).
We familiarized ourselves with the types of equipment that would operate at the site
and the general nature of site activities in order to identify potential noise sources.
We obtained sound measurements of equipment from other sites and from equipment
manufacturers that were representative of the equipment to be used at the site.
We modeled the on-site sound levels, calculating the attenuation to the streets, as per
the noise provisions of the City ordinance, and to the nearest potential receptors,
consistent with the principles of SEQRA.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
12
SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL NOISE IMPACTS
Receptor Location Sound Level of
Trucks
Sound Level of
Stockpile Area
Sound Level of
Plant
Ambient Sound
Level
New Ambient
Sound Level
Sound Level
Increase
Riverside Avenue (East) 63.0 54.8 63.1 68.5 70.6 +2.1
Riverside Avenue (South) 51.4 56.2 62.5 67.1 68.7 +1.6
Residential Area to East 37.6 45.9 47.6 54.6 55.5 +1.3
Overlook Area 65.5 57.3 51.8 67.1 69.6 +2.5
All sound readings in dBA (one-hour L
eq
)
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
13
The expected sound levels due to on-site activities at the potential receptors to
determine the changes in the ambient sound level. These changes in sound levels
were compared to applicable standards and mitigation was added as needed. The
results of this analysis are shown on the table on the next page.
The main noise sources in the area are the two power plants, the metal salvage yard, traffic on the
local roads and other industrial activities in the Port of Rensselaer.
6.5.1 Expected Sound Level at Riverside Avenue (East of Site)
The expected sound level of trucks on the perimeter access road, the loader and trucks in the
Stockpile Area and the Plant Area at Riverside Avenue is expected to be 63.0 dBA, 54.8 dBA and
63.1 dBA, respectively. The existing ambient sound level at Riverside Avenue was measured to
range from 68.5 to 70.2 dBA. Even assuming the lower ambient sound level, the resulting
combined sound level would be 70.6 dBA, a change from the current ambient level of 2.1 dBA.
Increases of less than three dBA are imperceptible to barely perceptible and well within the
normal fluctuation of sound levels in this area. No significant impact will occur.
6.5.2 Expected Sound Level at Riverside Avenue (South of Site)
The expected sound level of trucks on the perimeter access road, the loader and trucks in the
Stockpile Area and the Plant Area at Riverside Avenue to the south of the site is expected to be
51.4 dBA, 56.2 dBA and 62.5 dBA, respectively. The existing ambient sound level measured at
the Port Expressway ranged from 67.1 to 69.6 dBA. Even assuming the lower ambient sound
level, the resulting combined sound level would be 68.7 dBA, a change from the current ambient
level of 1.6 dBA. Increases of less than three dBA are imperceptible to barely perceptible and
well within the normal fluctuation of sound levels in this area. No significant impact will occur.
6.5.3 Expected Sound Level at Residential Area
The expected sound level of trucks on the perimeter access road, the loader and trucks in the
Stockpile Area and the Plant Area at the residential area to the east of the site is expected to be
37.6 dBA, 45.9 dBA and 47.6 dBA, respectively. The existing ambient sound level measured at
the residential area ranged from 54.6 to 55.5 dBA. Even assuming the lower ambient sound level,
the resulting combined sound level would be 55.9 dBA, a change from the current ambient level
of 1.3 dBA. Increases of less than three dBA are imperceptible to barely perceptible and well
within the normal fluctuation of sound levels in this area. No significant impact will occur.
6.5.4 Expected Sound Level at Overlook Area
The expected sound level of trucks on the perimeter access road, the loader and trucks in the
Stockpile Area and the Plant Area at the proposed overlook area to the southwest of the site is
expected to be 65.3 dBA, 57.3 dBA and 51.8 dBA, respectively. The existing ambient sound
level was measured at Riverside Avenue was measured to range from 67.1 to 69.6 dBA. Even
assuming the lower ambient sound level, the resulting combined sound level would be 69.6 dBA,
a change from the current ambient level of 2.5 dBA. Increases of less than three dBA are
imperceptible to barely perceptible and well within the normal fluctuation of sound levels in this
area. No significant impact will occur.
6.5.5 Recommended Noise Best Management Practices
Although the acoustical analysis above indicated no potential significant changes in the sound
levels around the site due to the proposed project, the following best management practices are
recommended to keep sound levels low and to address potential impulse sounds:
Equipment, including noise control mufflers, should be kept in good repair
Speed limits on the site should be 15 miles per hour
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
14
The blacktop plant should be oriented as shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed
Conditions). This location and orientation was chosen because it orients the loudest
part of the plant away from potential receptors and keeps the loudest site activities as
far from public areas as possible.
The proposed entrance/perimeter access road should be paved. A smooth road
reduces the sound level of trucks.
Loadout from the stockpiles should be from the interior of the piles, thus leaving the
bulk of the piles as a sound barrier between the equipment and potential off-site
receptors to the maximum extent practicable.
The proposed flow through traffic patterns will reduce the need for heavy equipment
to back up. However, the loader in the Stockpile Area should be equipped with a
white noise back up alarm or a sonar activated alarm that only sounds when it detects
an obstacle behind the reversing loader.
Truck drivers will be instructed to use jake brakes only in emergency situations.
Truck drivers will be instructed to not slam tailgates when they empty a load of RAP
or aggregate.
6.5.6 Noise Conclusions
There will be no significant noise impact due to site operation even at the closest public and
residential areas. More distant locations will similarly not be impacted.
6.6 Floodplain
The site has been laid out so that no structures are located in the 100-year floodplain.
Approximately 1050 cubic yards of fill will be placed in the 100-year floodplain area. The septic
system will likely be a raised bed system above the 100-year floodplain level and will be
approved by the County Department of Health. The displacement of potential floodwaters by the
fill (entrance/perimeter access road and some of the perimeter berms along the eastern side of the
site) will result in no significant increase in flood level. No significant impacts will occur.
6.7 Stormwater
Potential impacts to stormwater during operations were an integral part of laying out the site and
have been addressed in the Site Plan. These measures include:
Perimeter berms will control runon to the site and prevent runoff from the Plant and
Stockpile Areas
Rollover curbs on the entrance/perimeter access road will keep sediment laden
stormwater on-site.
The roads will be paved and swept regularly to prevent trackage onto public roads
and buildup of sediment
Trackage and spillage will be cleaned up promptly
Approximately 53 percent of the site will be green space.
Disturbed areas outside the Plant and Stockpile Areas will be revegetated.
The Plant and Stockpile Areas will drain internally to the Stormwater Management
Area for treatment and promotion of infiltration prior to discharge to the existing
stormwater system along the Port Expressway.
Erosion and sediment control issues during construction are addressed in the Construction
SWPPP.
Petroleum products are stored in double-lined containers or within impermeable secondary
containment. Delivery of these products will occur on an impermeable pad, as shown in the Site
Plan. Inspection, spill prevention and spill prevention training will be done in accordance with
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
15
applicable EPA and NYSDEC requirements. Spill clean up kits will be kept on site and the
NYSDEC Spill Hotline will be contacted in the event of a reportable spill. Any spills will be
cleaned up properly.
6.8 Groundwater
No significant impacts to groundwater or groundwater users will occur due to project
implementation. The site is remotely located and surrounded by larger and more intense
industrial uses than proposed for this site. There are no groundwater users near the site.
Best management practices to protect surface and groundwater are described in the Construction
SWPPP. These measures include but are not limited to:
Controlling runoff from the site and directing it to the Stormwater Management
system for treatment prior to discharge;
The septic system will likely be a raised bed system above the 100-year floodplain
level and will be approved by the County Department of Health;
Storing petroleum products, additives and asphalt in covered buildings and in doubly
lined tanks with secondary containment;
All petroleum products will be stored in accordance with petroleum bulk storage
regulations;
Fuel transfer areas will be paved;
Equipment parking areas will be paved; and
The site will operate under a Multi-Sector General Permit and a Spill Prevention,
Countermeasure and Control Plan.
6.9 Plants and Wildlife
The site has been historically used for industrial purposes and was recently used as a construction
lay down and parking area during the construction of the nearby power plant. The site is covered
by a layer of crushed stone that in turn overlies a layer of older fill.
NYSDEC was contacted when this project began and stated that although there are significant
species that have been identified in the area that since the site had been previously disturbed there
was no potential to impact any species or habitat. No significant habitat exists on the site—the
site is almost exclusively covered by a barren layer of crushed stone (see photos below). No
potential impacts to plants and wildlife can occur.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
16
Photo looking northeasterly showing the general nature of the site. The site has been previously
disturbed and is covered by a layer of crusher run.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
17
Photo looking southeasterly showing the general nature of the site. The site has been previously
disturbed and is covered by a layer of crusher run.
6.10 Cultural Resources
A Phase 1A/1BCultural Resources investigation was performed at the site and is include din the
Appendix. This investigation found that most of the native soils had been removed by prior
industrial activities over a large portion of the site. The site has been historically used for
industrial purposes and was recently used as a construction lay down and parking area during the
construction of the nearby power plant. The site is covered by a layer of crushed stone that in
turn overlies a layer of older fill. No significant impacts to cultural resources were identified.
The potential impacts of the project on existing or potentially eligible historical resources in the
surrounding community were investigated in the Visual Study in the Appendix. No significant
impacts will occur to historical resources.
6.11 Energy Use
The proposed plant will be powered by electricity supplied by the adjacent utility line. The drum
will use natural gas from the adjacent gas service. There is no indication there is insufficient
capacity to connect to the adjacent gas and electrical services and no indication this relatively
minor user will require construction of a new substation or upgrading of an existing substation.
The site is adjacent to a series of transmission lines so the only added infrastructure would be the
connection. The electrical lines already extend to the site so this would require minimal work.
The project is not well-suited for using on-site renewable energy sources. There is very little free
space on-site so it would not be practical to set up a large array of solar panels of a wind turbine.
In fact, to do so would be almost as much of a project as building the blacktop plant. There is no
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
18
usable hydroelectric power on site. The project proposes to use the available adjacent gas and
electrical services, both of which are widely recognized as clean energy sources. The blacktop
plant will be state of the art and more fuel efficient and cleaner than the older plants that are
currently serving this market. Construction of this plant will not create additional demand for
blacktop but it will reduce overall emissions by reducing the distance traveled by trucks to and
from the blacktop plant and by having a cleaner, more fuel efficient plant. Overall, this plant will
reduce energy consumption.
In addition, this plant will be more capable of fully using recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) in the
blacktop. This reduces the need for asphalt, requires less energy to make blacktop and
incorporates a potential waste product into a valuable and salable product.
Energy will not be significantly impacted by the project.
6.12 Odor and Light
These potential impacts were also addressed earlier in this application. The proposed plant will
be state of the art and incorporates technology to prevent odors and blue smoke.
A lighting plan was submitted with the application and all lights were hooded and shown only on
the site. Further:
There are no residences or receptors adjacent to the site that could be impacted by the
limited lights to be used at the site;
The site is located in the middle of an industrial zoned area surrounded by other more
intensive industrial uses—these uses employ lighting to a much greater extent than
the proposed blacktop plant; and
The site will typically only operate at night when supplying a project mandated
(typically NYSDOT) paving job. Nighttime paving is done to reduce impacts to the
driving public and benefits everyone.
The project will not produce odors and lighting will not be a significant impact.
6.13 Human Health
The presence of a spill remediation on or adjacent to the site or the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste on other sites is not relevant to an assessment of the potential impacts of this project. The
BASF site is located more than 2000 feet north of the site but construction and operation of a
blacktop plant on our property will not affect the remediation done on that property or any other
properties. There will be no export of on-site materials from this property. The on-site materials
will be graded and used on site.
The only known institutional controls limiting the use of the site are: (1) the bike path and
overlook which are outside the limits of the project and were purposely avoided by the project;
and (2) the easements for utilities which were identified and purposely avoided during the design
and layout of the property. The only interaction between easements and the projects will be
where the access roads cross such easements and this crossing is not contravened by the
easements and will in no way impact the utilities that are the subject of the easements.
Human health will not be significantly impacted by the project.
6.14 Community Character
Local fire, EMS and police departments are staffed and equipped to protect industrial
installations. The project will place no additional demands on schools.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Application for Blacktop Plant 5/31/11
19
The site has been previously disturbed, most recently having been graded and covered by a layer
of crusher run to serve as a lay down and parking area for the construction of the adjacent power
generating plant. A cultural resources investigation has been performed and no evidence of
historical structures has been found on the site to date. The Visual Study assessed potential
impacts to all structures within the study area, including historical structures, and no significant
impacts were identified.
The site is zoned industrial, has been used for industrial purposes in the past and the
comprehensive and riverfront revitalization plans both call for its continued industrial use. By
definition, projects that comply with the locally adopted planning documents cannot have a
significant impact on community character.
No potential impacts to the bike path or overlook will occur, as outlined in Section 6.4 above.
APPENDIX
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, PART 1
617.20
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may
be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of
a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal
knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge
in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process
has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists
a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance
as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The
form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is
actually important.
THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and
considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that:
A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a
significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore
a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the
environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
*A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
Date
Page 1 of 10
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the
environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the
application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe
will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies,
research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance.
Name of Action
Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Name of Applicant/Sponsor
Address
City / PO State Zip Code
Business Telephone
Name of Owner (if different)
Address
City / PO State Zip Code
Business Telephone
Description of Action:
New Castle Asphalt, LLC--Proposed Blacktop Plant
Riverside Drive, Port of Rensselaer, City of Rensselaer, Rensselaer County, New York
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
118 Button Road
Waterford
NY
12188
(518) 432-4470
Albany-Rensselaer Port District Commission
106 Smith Boulevard
Albany
NY
12202
(518) 463-8763
Construction and operation of a 400 ton per hour capacity drum mix blacktop plant on an industrially zoned parcel approximately 12
acres in size.
Page 2 of 10
Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present Land Use: Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm)
Forest Agriculture Other
2.
Total acreage of project area: acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres
Other (Indicate type) acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site?
a. Soil drainage: Well drained % of site Moderately well drained % of site.
Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land
Classification System?
acres (see 1 NYCRR 370).
4.
Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Yes No
a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet)
5.
Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes:
0-10% % 10- 15% % 15% or greater %
6.
Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of
Historic Places? Yes No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes No
8.
What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)
9.
Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Yes No
10.
Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes No
Former staging area for power plant construction
12
6
5
0.5
0.5
0
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
5
5
0
1
100
N/A
>100'
95
0
5
12-17'
Reset
Page 3 of 10
Udorthents (sandy), part of site covered by crusher run
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Yes No
According to:
Identify each species:
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations?
Yes No
Describe:
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
Yes No
If yes, explain:
14.
Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Yes No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
b. Size (in acres):
Site previously disturbed
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Hudson River is the western boundary of the property
N/A
None
N/A
Reset
Page 4 of 10
17.
Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes No
a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes No
b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes No
18.
Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and
304? Yes No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL,
and 6 NYCRR 617?
Yes No
20.
Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes No
B.
Project Description
1.
Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate).
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. %
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft.
2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards.
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Yes No N/A
a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes No
4.
How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres.
12
6
6
6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Varies
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
1ac grass
Page 5 of 10
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
Yes No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: months, (including demolition)
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number)
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition)
c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes No
8. Will blasting occur during construction ? Yes No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project .
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes No
If yes, explain:
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Yes No
If yes, explain:
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Yes No
16.
Will the project generate solid waste? Yes No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Yes No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes No
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reset
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 6 of 10
N/A
N/A
e. If yes, explain:
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Yes No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Yes No
21.
Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes No
If yes, indicate type(s)
22.
If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute.
23.
Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24.
Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Yes No
If yes, explain:
N/A
N/A
N/A
Energy use will be reduced by providing a local source of blacktop, reducing the distance this material needs to be hauled to the
job site.
N/A
0
N/A
Page 7 of 10
Reset
25. Approvals Required:
Type Submittal Date
City, Town, Village Board Yes No
City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No
City, Town Zoning Board Yes No
City, County Health Department Yes No
Other Local Agencies Yes No
Other Regional Agencies Yes No
State Agencies Yes No
Federal Agencies Yes No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes No
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Zoning amendment Zoning variance New/revision of master plan Subdivision
Site plan Special use permit Resource management plan Other
Site Plan Review/SUP
2/11
DEC Air Permit
N/A
DEC Stormwater MSGP
2/11
Page 8 of 10
2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site?
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site?
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action?
8.
Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ¼ mile? Yes No
9.
If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
Industrial
Heavy industrial
N/A
N/A
N/A
Industrial, power plant, cogeneration plant, metal salvage yard, fuel storage and distribution
N/A
N/A
Reset
Page 9 of 10
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Yes No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection?
Yes No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes No
12.
Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Yes No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts
associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them.
E.
Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Date
Signature
Title
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this
assessment.
The existing community services can readily handle the minimal demands of this project
All traffic will use the Stewart Port Expressway which is specifically intended for truck traffic from the Port of Rensselaer.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
2/3/11
Principal Geologist, Consultant representing applicant
Reset
Page 10 of 10
VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DATED MAY 2011
NOTE: ALL OVERSIZED DRAWINGS ARE IN SEPARATE FILE
Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
8 Brunswick Road Troy, New York 12180
Phone: (518) 270-5920 Fax: (518) 270-5922
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT, LLC
Rensselaer (Riverside Avenue) Plant
Port of Rensselaer, City of Rensselaer, Rensselaer County, New
York
APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF BLACKTOP PLANT:
VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Prepared by: Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
Date: May 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Location ................................................................................................................................ 1
2.2 Existing Conditions............................................................................................................... 1
2.3 Proposed Operations ............................................................................................................. 2
2.3.1 Proposed Access and Traffic Flow ................................................................................ 2
2.3.2 Access Control............................................................................................................... 3
2.3.3 Truck Routes.................................................................................................................. 3
2.3.4 Blacktop Plant Components and Layout ....................................................................... 3
2.3.5 Stockpile Area ............................................................................................................... 4
2.3.6 Stormwater Management Area...................................................................................... 5
2.3.7 Parking........................................................................................................................... 5
2.3.8 Lighting.......................................................................................................................... 5
2.3.9 Truck Loading Areas ..................................................................................................... 5
2.3.10 Equipment Operation................................................................................................... 5
3.0 METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Literature Review.................................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Initial Assessment of Viewshed............................................................................................ 6
3.3 Development of Computerized Model and Viewshed Analysis ........................................... 6
3.4 Balloon Test and Field Reconnaissance................................................................................ 6
3.5 Line of Sight Sections........................................................................................................... 6
4.0 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 7
5.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS ..................................................................................................... 7
5.1 Inventory of Aesthetic Resources ......................................................................................... 7
5.1.1 Literature and Website Research ................................................................................... 8
6.0 ANALYSIS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................... 8
6.1 Impact Assessment................................................................................................................ 8
6.1.1 Proposed City Boat Launch (Comprehensive Plan) ...................................................... 9
6.1.2 Water Filtration Plant on Riverside Avenue................................................................ 10
6.1.3 Fort Crailo Park ........................................................................................................... 11
6.1.4 Sidewalk in Front of Fort Crailo.................................................................................. 12
6.1.5 Front Yard of 383 Route 9J ......................................................................................... 13
6.1.6 Stilsing Electric on Route 9J........................................................................................ 14
6.1.7 Near Riverview Terrace, Rensselaer ........................................................................... 15
6.1.8 53 Hillview Avenue, Rensselaer.................................................................................. 16
6.1.9 42 Ridge Road, Rensselaer .......................................................................................... 18
6.1.10 SUNY Albany East, Rensselaer................................................................................. 19
6.1.11 3
rd
and Catherine Streets, Rensselaer......................................................................... 20
6.1.12 Overlook on Empire State Plaza................................................................................ 21
6.1.13 22 Liebel Street, Albany............................................................................................ 22
6.1.14 Albany Community Charter School, Leonard Street................................................. 23
6.1.15 Nutgrove Apartments, Albany................................................................................... 24
6.1.16 Kenwood Convent, Albany........................................................................................ 25
6.1.17 Island Creek Park, Albany......................................................................................... 26
Appendix
Visual Base Map dated April 22, 2011
Line of Sight Sections dated April 22, 2011 (two sheets)
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following Visual Impact Assessment is for the proposed construction and operation of a
blacktop mixing plant by New Castle Asphalt LLC in the Port of Rensselaer. This Visual Study
supplements the initial application to the City of Rensselaer Planning Commission.
This report assesses the potential visual impacts of the proposed blacktop plant by:
Identifying national, statewide and local aesthetic resources potentially within the
viewshed of the project area;
Determining the potential visual impact of the project at identified aesthetic resources and
receptor locations; and
Proposing mitigation measures as needed to mitigate any potential visual impacts to the
maximum extent practicable.
The Visual Impact Assessment was prepared in accordance with and uses standard assessment
methodologies as described in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) Visual Policy.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Location
The site is located on the west and north side of Riverside Drive, just northwest of the western
end of the Irwin Stewart Port Expressway. The location and surrounding area is shown on the
Visual Base Map in the Appendix.
2.2 Existing Conditions
The site is accessed from U.S. Route 20 via the Port Expressway.
The site is located in the City of Rensselaer Industrial Zoning District and is in the active Port of
Rensselaer. The site is surrounded by existing heavy industrial activities including but not limited
to:
The Besicorp-Empire Power Generation Plant (to the northeast and east);
The Fulton Cogeneration Associates Power Cogeneration Plant (to the north)
A large-scale scrap-metal crusher and export operation (to the northwest); and
Several active petroleum bulk storage and distribution facilities (to the south), the
closest being the Getty Terminal Facility (see map on page 2) and Polsinello Fuels.
In addition, the land west of the site (across and on the west side of the Hudson River) is occupied
by a variety of heavy industrial activities in the Port of Albany.
The site is well suited for the proposed project. The proposed 400 ton per hour blacktop mixing
plant will assimilate well into the surrounding heavy industrial activities and will not cause any
significant contrast to the industrial character of the zoning district. All potentially sensitive
receptors are separated from this site by intervening heavy industrial activity. The distances
between the nearest potential receptors are:
Ft. Crailo—approximately 3700 feet north of site
Ball Field—approximately 3300 feet north of site
Educational facility—SUNY facility on US Route 20—approximately 2600 feet
Nearest residential area to the north—approximately 3300 feet
Nearest residence in primarily commercial area east of site—approximately 1400 feet
Nearest residential area—approximately 1800 feet east of site.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
2
The intended use of the site is industrial, which is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan
and Waterfront Revitalization Plan.
The Site Plan Map (Existing Conditions) attached to the Site Plan Application shows the existing
conditions of the site. In general, the site grades gently from an approximate high elevation of 26
feet above mean sea level at the top of the bank along the Hudson River down to an elevation of
approximately 18 feet along an active railroad spur on the east side of the property. The
easternmost part of the side grades up slightly (elevation 19 feet) towards Riverside Avenue.
The property narrows in its southwest portion near the 90 degree turn in Riverside Avenue. This
part of the property grades to the steep bank of the Hudson River.
The site was formerly used as a lay down and parking area for the construction of the adjacent
plant. Most of the proposed site is covered by a layer of crushed stone. A secondary growth of
mixed trees and brush covers the western and northern perimeters of the property. The remainder
of the site is covered by open grasslands.
A single line railroad spur exists along the northeast and eastern parts of the property. This spur
is not proposed to be used by the applicant but is used by the adjacent metal salvage operation.
2.3 Proposed Operations
2.3.1 Proposed Access and Traffic Flow
All vehicles will access the site via the proposed entrance from Riverside Avenue on the
southeast part of the site. This proposed entrance is at the location of an existing access point.
All vehicles will travel north on the entrance road along the east side of the site. Trucks
delivering recycled asphalt pavement (“RAP”) and aggregates will turn left into the Stockpile
Area, deposit their materials at the appropriate stockpile, travel west across the Stockpile Area to
the perimeter access road, turn left (south) and depart the site.
Employees, liquid asphalt and delivery trucks and trucks picking up blacktop will proceed north
along the entrance road along the east side of the site to the Plant Area. Employees will park in
the two parking areas near the plant or the lab and depart via the perimeter access road along the
west side of the site.
Liquid asphalt and delivery trucks will use the road that bypasses the blacktop plant, take a left
turn just north of the plant, deliver their materials to the bulk storage area from the concrete pad,
proceed southwest to the perimeter access road, turn left (south) and depart the site via Riverside
Avenue.
Trucks picking up blacktop will proceed north along the entrance road along the east side of the
site, turn left into the Plant Area, wait until signaled to pull under the plant discharge and hot
silos, receive their load of blacktop, pull out from beneath the plant heading north, turn left (west)
onto the perimeter access road, go around the north side of the lab and proceed south to the site
exit onto Riverside Avenue.
Overall, the flow of traffic on the entrance road/perimeter access road will be one-way in a
counter-clockwise direction.
Two rollover curbs will be placed in the entrance/perimeter access road to contain stormwater on
site. The rollover curb is a surface water divide in the road that on one side directs stormwater
back towards the interior of the site and on the other side keeps stormwater from entering the site.
The entrance/perimeter access road will be paved.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
3
2.3.2 Access Control
Access to the site will be controlled by perimeter berms and the gates on the entrance
road/perimeter access road, as shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed Conditions). The gates’
typical construction is shown on the Details Sheets in the Site Plan Application.
2.3.3 Truck Routes
Employee vehicles and most delivery trucks will travel south and west on Riverside Avenue to
the Port Expressway to access the site. The nearest liquid asphalt distributor is Gorman Brothers,
located further south of the site in the Port of Rensselaer, so it is expected that liquid asphalt
deliveries will come via Riverside Avenue from the south.
Trucks leaving the Port of Rensselaer from this site will use NYS Route 9J and US Route 20.
The potential impact of project generated traffic is assessed in the Traffic Study prepared by
Creighton Manning Engineers. No significant impact is expected since the trucks will use
designated truck routes designed to carry truck traffic before exiting onto state or federal
highways intended for truck traffic.
2.3.4 Blacktop Plant Components and Layout
The proposed blacktop plant will be a drum mix plant. Drum mix plants produce one type of
blacktop at a time in a continuous feed as compared to batch plants that can make a different
batch of blacktop for each “batch”. Drum mix plants are becoming more common than batch
plants because they are more efficient, employ superior emission control technology and produce
a generally more uniform and higher quality product.
The blacktop plant consists of various components, all necessary for its efficient operation. These
components are:
Cold feed bins—Aggregates at ambient temperatures (hence the term “cold”) are
loaded into these bins, metered out through the bottom onto a conveyor that delivers
the aggregates to the drum. A screen removes potential clumps in the aggregate
before it enters the drum.
RAP bins—RAP is loaded into bins, crushed to size in a single pass, metered out
through the bottom onto a conveyor that delivers the aggregates to the drum. The
RAP is fed into the drum mixing zone as a means of controlling blue smoke. A
screen removes potential clumps in the RAP before it enters the drum.
Drum—The drum is a near horizontally oriented cylinder that slowly rotates.
Aggregates are fed into the drum and heated by a low NO
x
emissions burner which
dries the aggregates and heats them to the temperature of the liquid asphalt,
promoting better adhesion and a more durable blacktop. The drum uses counterflow
technology which means the aggregate moves in the opposite direction of the heat
from the burner. Aggregate moves through the center of the drum and is heated
while the RAP is introduced into an isolated mixing chamber behind the burner.
Flights inside the drum keep the RAP flowing along the exterior of the drum where it
is subject to less heat. These technologies eliminate odors and blue smoke. Liquid
asphalt is metered into the drum in the mixing area before the aggregate/RAP/liquid
asphalt mixture is removed from the drum via hot mix conveyor to the hot storage
silos and discharge area.
Hot Storage Silos/Discharge Area—Trucks pull onto one of the two scales under the
silos and discharge area to be loaded. The appropriate mix is dropped via chute into
the waiting truck. When full, the truck pulls out, trims, picks up a ticket at the
control room, covers the blacktop at the truck rack and leaves the site. Since a drum
plant produces one mix at a time, the hot storage silos serve the purpose of holding
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
4
and discharging multiple mixes and providing surge storage. The use of silos tends
to even out the flow of traffic. The silos are heated to keep the blacktop from
hardening.
Baghouse—One of the most noticeable and largest components of the blacktop plant
are the emission control features, including the baghouse. The emissions from the
drum are collected by a positive reclaim system and fed back in a closed loop to the
burner for ignition to prevent blue smoke and odors. The exhaust emissions are fed
by enclosed duct to the baghouse. Oversized particles are removed at the entrance to
the baghouse and the air is circulated in a circuitous path through the hanging bags.
Particulates adhere to and drop from the bags and are collected by a screw conveyor
that moves the dust to a collection silo. The collection silo is periodically emptied
and stored on site. The baghouse removes approximately 99.94 percent of particulate
matter and modern blacktop plants are minor sources of dust. Essentially all of the
dust is re-incorporated into the blacktop.
Control Room— The plant is highly automated with the controls located in this room.
The plant operator works in this room, sets the plant to produce the desired mixes and
prints the ticket for each load
Liquid Storage—Liquids used in the manufacture of blacktop and maintenance of the
plant are stored in tanks in the area northwest of the drum. These tanks are located
within impermeable secondary containment. Trucks delivering these fluids park on
an impermeable concrete pad.
Lab—Routine labs tests required by specifying agencies are performed in the lab.
This testing ensures that high quality blacktop is produced.
Spray Bars and Truck Racks—Automated spray bars spray the bed of blacktop trucks
to prevent blacktop from sticking. This process is automated and controlled by the
plant operator to prevent truck drivers from over application and subsequent leakage.
The truck racks after the plant allow truck drivers to trim and cover the blacktop prior
to leaving the site.
The location, size and height of these structures is shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed
Conditions) in the Site Plan Application.
2.3.5 Stockpile Area
Aggregate and RAP will be hauled to the site in tri-axle dump trucks (22 ton loads) and trailer
dump trucks (34 ton loads). The aggregates and RAP that make up the bulk of the blacktop will
be stored in open piles in the Stockpile Area in the southern part of the property. The Stockpile
Area will be bermed along its perimeter and graded to direct stormwater towards the stormwater
management area.
The floor of the Stockpile Area will be covered with crushed stone.
The size and location of the stockpiles will vary over time as materials will be delivered and fed
to the plant and different aggregates will be needed for different types of blacktop. In general, it
is anticipated that the aggregates will consist of different sizes of crushed stone (e.g. NYSDOT
#3, #2, #1, #1A, Screenings, Natural Sand) so it’s not possible to state how much of each product
will be on site at any time. The height of the stockpiles will be approximately 20 feet or less.
RAP will also be stored in the Stockpile Area. RAP from milled up roads will be re-used in the
blacktop, thereby reducing the need to landfill, reducing the amount of aggregates needed, and
reducing the amount of fuel and asphalt needed.
Aggregates and RAP will be excavated from the piles by a rubber tired front end loader and fed to
the cold feed and RAP bins, respectively.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
5
2.3.6 Stormwater Management Area
Currently, stormwater drains towards the railroad spur along the east side of the site. Water
collects along the railroad spur and infiltrates or overflows the area, entering the existing
stormwater system along Riverside Avenue and the Port Expressway.
The perimeter of the site will be bermed to prevent runon into the site and keep runoff from
leaving disturbed areas of the site. Rollover curbs will be placed on the perimeter access road to
keep the site drainage internal and prevent runon to the site.
Runoff from the Stockpile and Plant Areas will be directed to the Stormwater Management Area
(“SMA”) in the east-center of the site. The runoff will enter a stone-lined ditch along the west
and north sides of the SMA. The ditch will empty into a sediment trap which will empty into a
detention pond. Water will be treated in this system prior to being discharged into the same
stormwater system that currently receives the site’s runoff.
2.3.7 Parking
Approximately six people will be employed at the site. Off-street parking for 15 has been
provided: three spots by the lab and 12 spots by the plant.
2.3.8 Lighting
NYSDOT, the Thruway Authority and other specifying agencies periodically require that roads
be paved at night for the convenience of the motoring public. The adjacent power plants operate
at night also. Therefore, the site will be equipped with lights for required night time operations.
The existing lighting will be kept in place as much as possible. The Stockpile Area will be lit by
two of the existing pole mounted lights. The pole in the southern part of the Stockpile Area will
be moved a few feet to the southeast to avoid areas frequented by equipment.
The cold feed bins and RAP bins will be lit by another of the existing pole mounted lights.
The Plant Area will be illuminated by hooded lights mounted on the plant and related structures.
The locations of the existing and proposed lights are shown on the Site Plan Map (Proposed
Conditions) in the Site Plan Application.
2.3.9 Truck Loading Areas
Trucks will be loaded with blacktop under the hot storage silos, described in Section 2.3.4 above.
2.3.10 Equipment Operation
Heavy equipment will be used as needed to operate the site. Rubber tired front end loaders will
operate in the Stockpile Area to feed RAP and aggregates to the blacktop plant. A small skid
steer will be used to clean up loose debris, mainly in the Plant Area. A small off-road truck will
move material around the site on an infrequent basis. An excavator will be used to clean out
stormwater features for a few days per year. On road trucks will deliver aggregates (primarily
trailer dumps), deliver RAP (a mix of tri-axle dumps and trailer dumps) and pick up blacktop
(primarily tri-axle dumps).
3.0 METHODOLOGY
This Visual Impact Assessment was prepared using review of published literature, initial
topographic map and aerial photo assessment, development of a computerized three dimensional
model and viewshed analyses, aerial photo assessment to determine the locations of wooded area,
line of sight sectional analyses and field verification of the computer modeling and line of sight
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
6
sectional analyses. This methodology assesses all structures and potential receptors within a 2.5-
mile radius of the site.
3.1 Literature Review
Published literature and authoritative websites were reviewed to identify potential aesthetic
resources of statewide and local significance within the study area, in accordance with the
NYSDEC Visual Policy. All identified resources within the study area were considered during
this impact assessment.
3.2 Initial Assessment of Viewshed
The site layout and regional topography was preliminarily assessed using site specific maps,
topographic quadrangle maps and aerial photos of the study area. This initial analysis indicated
that due to the location, topography and orientation of the proposed site, the site would have a
very limited viewshed, particularly to the east and west of the site.
3.3 Development of Computerized Model and Viewshed Analysis
A computerized three dimensional topographic model of the study area was created using the
digital elevation models for the Troy South, East Greenbush, Albany and Delmar 7.5 minute
quadrangles. Due to the relatively flat-lying topography in the Hudson River Valley and the large
number of buildings in the potential viewshed area, this topographic model was not useful.
Modeling the height and shape of the numerous buildings in the Cities of Rensselaer and Albany
was an enormous undertaking so more reliance was placed on the field reconnaissance.
3.4 Balloon Test and Field Reconnaissance
Two large red weather balloons were placed at the location of hot storage silos, the highest
structures of the proposed blacktop plant. The upper balloon was placed at the same height as the
silos; the lower balloon was flown at a height approximately five to eight feet below the upper
balloon to provide a larger target and to allow for a better determination of the amount of the silos
that might be potentially visible.
All roads within a 2.5 mile radius of the site were driven and walked out on April 22, 2011 to
determine the locations from which the balloons and silos would be potentially visible. This field
reconnaissance was done during leaf-off conditions and, thus, represents a worst-case assessment.
The location of and direction to the site was verified by map orientation and instrument
measurement of bearings. Binoculars were used to confirm the potential visibility of the site as
needed, especially from more distant locations.
Locations having any view of the site were noted and the degree and nature of the potential
visibility was assessed and noted.
3.5 Line of Sight Sections
Line of Sight Sections (see Appendix) were drawn from all potentially sensitive receptors in the
study area that were identified during the field reconnaissance as having potential views of any
part of the site. Intervening wooded areas were added to the sections based on review of the 2007
aerial photos with two foot resolution. The height of the trees in the wooded areas was assumed
to be 40 feet
1
. Trees that will be removed during construction were not used in the assessment.
The sections show the distinction between vegetation that will remain and on-site vegetation that
will ultimately be removed. Lines of sight were drawn from the receptor, assuming an eye height
of six feet above the ground (or walkway in the case of the Empire State Plaza), looking towards
1
This is conservative since no wooded areas were found to be less than 40 feet high and the average height
of wooded areas was found to be 60 feet during the field verification
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
7
the site. Intervening topography and wooded areas were identified and the potential visibility
assessed.
The following were field verified during leaf off conditions for accuracy:
The presence of potential receptors within the potential viewshed
The location, height and effectiveness of an intervening wooded buffer
The assessment of potential visibility
A 300-foot thickness of leafless deciduous trees was considered a total visual screen, as per
standard practice. Lesser thicknesses of deciduous trees (when leafless) are considered partial
screens. Coniferous trees generally provide a more effective screen.
4.0 STUDY AREA
A composite 2.5-mile radius study area was evaluated to determine the potential visual impacts
associated with the project. This radius is roughly double the distance typically required by the
NYS OPRHP. Even at this distance, the silos would be difficult to distinguish even with
binoculars. The study area distance was determined by taking into account the following factors:
Overall scope of the project;
The nature of the surrounding, largely industrial area;
Changes in topography of construction;
The scale of the project relative to the distances to potential receptors;
Relation of site to surrounding topography; and
Proposed structures, including the blacktop plant.
At distances beyond 2.5 miles atmospheric conditions render most detail indiscernible to the
casual observer and the site is barely discernible even with binoculars.
The extent of the study area is shown on the enclosed Visual Base Map.
5.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS
5.1 Inventory of Aesthetic Resources
The following aesthetic resources were inventoried in accordance with the NYSDEC Visual
Policy:
Properties on or eligible for inclusion in the National or State Register of Historic Places
State Parks
Urban Cultural Parks
The State Forest Preserves
National Wildlife Refuges, State Game Refuges and State Wildlife Management Areas
National Natural Landmarks
The National Park System, Recreation Areas, Seashores and Forests
Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational
A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated or eligible for designation as scenic
Scenic Areas of Statewide Significance
A State or Federally designated trail, or one proposed for designation
Adirondack Park Scenic Vistas
State Nature and Historic Preserve Areas
Palisades Park
Bond Act Properties purchased under Exceptional Scenic Beauty or Open Space category
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
8
5.1.1 Literature and Website Research
Literature and authoritative websites were reviewed to identify all potential aesthetic resources of
statewide and local significance within the study area. Sources of information included but were
not limited to:
The New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation’s SPHINX
System
The National Register of Historic Places
The New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation’s Regional
Map of State Parks
Cornell University Geospatial Information Repository
NYSDEC State Recreation Lands interactive navigator
National Wildlife Refuge System Map
NYSDEC list of New York State Wildlife Management Areas
National Park Service Map of National Natural Landmarks in New York State
National Park Service Map of the National Park System areas in New York State
NYSDEC Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers Program
The New York State Department of Transportation Scenic Byways Map
The City of Albany Comprehensive Plan
The City of Rensselaer Comprehensive Plan
The locations of these and all other potential sensitive receptors were evaluated during this
assessment.
6.0 ANALYSIS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The following criteria were used to analyze the potential for visual impact:
Distance—The potential for visual impact decreases as the distance between the resource
and the project increases. Three main components of visual analysis (texture, lines and
color) are perceived differently at varying distances due to atmospheric effects The
following range of views were considered in the impact assessment:
o Foreground (0-1 mile). In the foreground, textures, lines and color are readily
discernible. Close up features make up a greater portion of the overall view at
any one location and typically have greater impacts than from more distant
views.
o Middle Ground (1-2½ miles). In the middle ground, textures tend to be poorly
discernible but lines and color are fairly discernible.
o Background (2½-5 miles). In the background, weather conditions can
significantly affect the visibility, texture is not discernible, lines tend to fade and
colors are muted. Distant features make up a smaller portion of the overall view
at any one location and typically have less impact than from more distant views.
Nature of the Resource and Circumstance of the View--The nature and value of the
resource is taken into account during the impact assessment. For example, the potential
visual impact to a national landmark is given greater weight than a residence or a non-
scenic road with the same potential view of the project.
Size and Duration of View—The size and duration of the project that would be visible
from each resource was considered in the impact assessment. All aspects of the project
were considered.
6.1 Impact Assessment
The potential visual impact of the proposed blacktop plant is assessed below for each location
with potential views of the site. All photos were taken from the most visible representative
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
9
vantage point using a 50 mm focal length that best reproduces what a human eye discerns.
6.1.1 Proposed City Boat Launch (Comprehensive Plan)
Photo 1 (Proposed City Boat Launch, Section A-A’): The City’s Waterfront Revitalization
Plan proposes a boat launch and historic overlook of the Port of Albany and its turning basin be
built to the west of the 90 degree bend in Riverside Avenue, southwest of the site. The boat
launch and overlook have not been built in the more than 20 years since it was first proposed and
it is uncertain when they will be built. This photo looks northeast and the vantage point is located
about 1120 feet from the proposed silos, the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to
the top balloon which was set at a height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top
of the silos). Approximately 30 feet of the silos would be visible through a partial screen of
vegetation from this location during leaf-off conditions. The lower approximately 54 feet of the
silos and the remainder of the site would not be visible during leaf-off conditions. During leaf-on
conditions, the top of the silos would likely be visible through a thicker vegetative screen (this
vegetation is located on the southwest part of the site and is not proposed to be removed). The
existing view includes the northwest part of the Getty Tank Farm (visible in the right side of the
photo). The purpose of the boat launch and historic overlook is to provide access to the river,
parking for facility users and a place to view the historic, industrial Port of Albany and the
turning basin for ships leaving the Port. As such, this viewpoint is intended to see a variety of
industrial uses. The partial vegetative screen and location of silos, the tallest structures in the
northern part of the proposed site, makes the best use of the existing screening trees from this
location. Line of Sight Section A-A’ shows that the trees at stations 0 to 2+10 and 2+90 to 3+80
will completely screen the view of the site from the boat launch (located further west of this
photo vantage point), even during leaf-off conditions. There is no significant impact to visual
resources at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
10
6.1.2 Water Filtration Plant on Riverside Avenue
Photo 2 (Water Filtration Plant on Riverside Avenue, Section H-H’): The water filtration
plant is located southwest of the Fort Crailo neighborhood. Although the filtration plant is not a
sensitive receptor, it represents the worst-case view of the proposed blacktop plant from this area.
The photo looks south and the vantage point is about 3450 feet from the proposed silos, the tallest
structures on the site (the red arrow points to the top balloon which was set at a height of
approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). From this vantage point, the
upper 40 feet of the silos would be partly visible through the utility lines along the east side of
Riverside Avenue and the vegetation (which would remain) located on the north side of the site.
The lower approximately 44 feet of the silos and remainder of the site would not be visible, even
during leaf-off conditions.
If the vantage point is moved a few feet to the left (east), the silos would be screened by the
building and vegetation on the east side of Riverside Avenue. If the vantage point is moved to
the middle of Riverside Avenue, the view is comparable. Leaf-on conditions do not significantly
change the potential visibility from this location.
The existing view includes the industries and businesses on both sides of Riverside Avenue, the
remnants of the BASF site, the metal scrap yard and the cogeneration plant. The area between
this vantage point and the site is zoned industrial and is intended to remain in industrial use
according to the Comprehensive Plan. The majority of the site will be screened by the trees to
remain along the north side of the site. The glimpse of the upper half of the silos down the
Riverside Avenue corridor will be brief, is below the horizon line of buildings and crossing utility
lines, is consistent with the character of the area and is hard to distinguish from the clutter of
utility lines. There is no significant impact to visual resources at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
11
6.1.3 Fort Crailo Park
Photo 3 (Fort Crailo Park, Section G-G’): Fort Crailo includes the historic building on the east
side of Riverside Avenue as well as a small riverfront park on the west side of Riverside Avenue.
Both are located in the Fort Crailo neighborhood. The photo looks south and the vantage point is
about 4050 feet from the proposed silos, the tallest structures on the site, which are not visible
from this vantage point or any location in the riverfront park. Note that the orange feature above
the brown building in the center of the photo is a wind sock and is not the red balloon
representing the position and height of the proposed silos. The silos are located along a line of
sight that is blocked by the brown building.
The existing view includes the industries and businesses on both sides of Riverside Avenue, the
remnants of the BASF site, the metal scrap yard and the blue-gray smokestack of the
cogeneration plant. The site is not visible from the park and there can be no significant impact to
visual resources at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
12
6.1.4 Sidewalk in Front of Fort Crailo
Photo 4 (Front Sidewalk at Fort Crailo, Section H-H’): Fort Crailo is an important historic
building located in the Crailo neighborhood of Rensselaer on the south side of Columbia
Turnpike (US Route 20). This vantage point is from the front sidewalk at Fort Crailo, where the
song, “Yankee Doodle” was composed in 1758. There is a very limited view of the silos from the
front sidewalk; the silos and remainder of the site are not visible from the building or other parts
of the ground.
The photo looks south and the vantage point is about 4050 feet from the proposed silos, the tallest
structures on the site (the red arrow points to the bottom balloon which was set at a height of
approximately 84 feet, the height of the top of the silos). From this vantage point, the upper 25
feet of the silos would be partly visible under the utility lines and through the trees along the east
side of Riverside Avenue. The vegetation (which would remain) located on the north side of the
site will completely screen the rest of the silos and the remainder of the site during leaf-off and
leaf-on conditions. The top 25 feet of the silos will be barely discernible at this distance during
leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes other residences in the Crailo neighborhood along the east side of
Riverside Avenue (the silos and site are not visible from the residences but are intermittently
visible from the front sidewalks), the industries and businesses on both sides of Riverside
Avenue, the remnants of the BASF site, the metal scrap yard and the cogeneration plant. The
majority of the site will be screened by the trees to remain along the north side of the site. The
glimpse of the upper portion of the silos down the Riverside Avenue corridor will be brief, is
below the horizon line of buildings and crossing utility lines, is consistent with the character of
the area and is hard to distinguish from the clutter of signs and utility lines. There is no
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
13
significant impact to visual resources at this location or in the area between this vantage point
and the Filtration Plant (see Photo 2 above).
6.1.5 Front Yard of 383 Route 9J
Photo 5 (Front Yard of 383 Route 9J, Section K-K’): The few residences along Route 9J to the
east of the site are the closest to the proposed blacktop plant. This vantage point is from the front
sidewalk at 383 Route 9J. There is a limited view of the upper half of the silos from the front
sidewalk; the lower part of the silos and remainder of the site are not visible from this location.
The photo looks westerly and the vantage point is about 1750 feet from the proposed silos, the
tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a height of
approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). From this vantage point, the
upper half of the silos would be partly visible during leaf-off conditions through the trees between
Route 9J and Riverside Avenue. The vegetation (which would remain) will significantly screen
the rest of the silos and the remainder of the site during leaf-off conditions. During leaf-on
conditions, the trees at Station 0+45 to 0+70, 2+70 to 3+00 and 3+20 to 3+65 (see Line of Sight
Section K-K’) will screen the lower part of the silos and the rest of the plant. The upper half of
the silos will be barely discernible through the trees during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes businesses along the west side of Route 9J, the tank farms on the
south side of Riverside Avenue south of the site and the power generating plants along Riverside
Avenue north of the site. The majority of the site will be screened by the trees to remain between
Riverside Avenue and Route 9J. The glimpse of the upper portion of the silos down Route 9J is
brief, is through the intervening trees and is consistent with the character of the area. There is no
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
14
significant impact to visual resources at this location or at the adjacent residences along Route
9J (see also Photo 6 below).
6.1.6 Stilsing Electric on Route 9J
Photo 6 (Near Stilsing Electric on Route 9J, Section M-M’): This portion of NYS Route 9J
contains businesses such as Stilsing Electric and offers a brief glimpse between buildings of the
upper approximately 20 feet of the silos. There are no residences in this area of limited visibility.
This vantage point is from the front of Stilsing Electric along the east side of Route 9J. There is a
limited view of the upper 20 feet of the silos from the front of the business; the lower part of the
silos and remainder of the site are not visible from the location during leaf-on conditions. During
leaf-off conditions, the lower parts of the silo would be significantly screened by the trees at
Stations 7+90 to 8+20 (see Line of Sight Section M-M’).
The photo looks westerly and the vantage point is about 1800 feet from the proposed silos, the
tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a height of
approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). From this vantage point, the
upper 20 feet of the silos would be visible during leaf-off and leaf-on conditions above the tree
line and below the power transmission lines. The vegetation (which would remain) will
completely screen the rest of the silos and the remainder of the site during leaf-off and leaf-on
conditions.
The existing view includes businesses along the west side of Route 9J, the tank farms on the
south side of Riverside Avenue south of the site and the power transmission lines along Riverside
Avenue east of the site. The majority of the site will be screened by the trees to remain between
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
15
Riverside Avenue and Route 9J. The glimpse of the upper portion of the silos down the Route 9J
is brief, is beneath the power transmission lines and is consistent with the character of the area.
There is no significant impact to visual resources at this location (see also Photo 5 above).
6.1.7 Near Riverview Terrace, Rensselaer
Photo 7 (Near 21 Riverview Terrace, Rensselaer, Section L-L’): Riverview Terrace is an east-
west trending road in the Prospect Heights neighborhood on the ridge east of the site. This
vantage point offers one of the least obstructed views that exist for some of the residences
through breaks or low spots in the trees east of the site along the west side of this neighborhood.
The views from the homes at lower elevations on the left and right side of this photo are more
completely screened by the trees to the east. The views from homes further up the hill (behind
the photo vantage point) are screened by homes, trees in the community and trees on the ridge to
the west.
This vantage point is typical of one of the few observed views in the Prospect Heights
neighborhood. The community was driven out to determine the location of publicly accessible
vantage points but there may be a few additional locations (e.g. in the back yards) that might have
views, particularly of the top of the silos.
This vantage point is near 21 Riverview Terrace, the most visible vantage point observed in this
area. The photo looks westerly and the vantage point is about 2500 feet from the proposed silos,
the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a
height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). There is a limited
view of the upper 15 feet of the silos from the location through the intervening trees during leaf-
off conditions (at Stations 1+60 to 2+20 on Line of Sight Section L-L’). During leaf-on
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
16
conditions, the upper part of the silos and the rest of the plant would be significantly screened.
The gray pad of crusher run on the site is visible in the thin spot in the trees to the left and below
the red arrow. The southern side of the blacktop plant and a portion of the stormwater
management area and the northern portion of the stockpile area will be visible during leaf-off
conditions from this location. During leaf-on conditions, the site will be screened.
Large portions of the industrial Port of Albany, the power generating plants in the Port of
Rensselaer, the tank farms on the south side of Riverside Avenue south of the site and the power
transmission lines along Riverside Avenue east of the site are visible from this location. The
visible upper portion of the silos will be hard to discern among the clutter of vertical power
transmission lines and industrial buildings, through a partial screen of trees during leaf-off
conditions. Equipment and truck movement will draw the eye during leaf-off conditions (the
plant typically does not operate during cold weather) much as trucks moving along Riverside
Avenue and the Port Expressway were observed during the field investigation. The glimpse of
the site during leaf-off conditions is brief, does not break the horizon line, is partially screened by
intervening trees and is consistent with the character of the area. There is no significant impact to
visual resources at this location (see also Photo 8 below for another view from the Prospect
Heights neighborhood).
6.1.8 53 Hillview Avenue, Rensselaer
Photo 8 (53 Hillview Avenue, Section M-M’): Hillview Avenue is an east-west trending road in
the Prospect Heights neighborhood on the ridge east of the site. This vantage point offers one of
the least obstructed views that exist for some of the residences through breaks or low spots in the
trees east of the site (along the west side of this neighborhood). The views from homes further up
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
17
the hill (behind the photo vantage point) are screened by homes, trees in the community and trees
on the ridge to the west.
This vantage point is typical of one of the few observed views in the Prospect Heights
neighborhood. The community was driven out to determine the location of publicly accessible
vantage points but there may be additional locations (e.g. in the back yards) that might have
views towards the site.
This vantage point is near 53 Hillview Avenue, near the west end of the road. The photo looks
northwesterly and the vantage point is about 2400 feet from the proposed silos, the tallest
structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a height of
approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). There is a limited view through
the intervening trees (at Stations 1+20 to 2+10 on Line of Sight Section M-M’) of the upper 10-
15 feet of the silos from this vantage point and scattered views of the crusher run pad to the south
of the proposed silo; the lower part of the silos and the rest of the site is mostly screened from this
location. The back yards were not accessible but the upper part of the silos and parts of the plant
and stockpile area are expected to be partially visible from the backyards through thin spots or
breaks in the trees during leaf-off conditions. During leaf-on conditions, the site will be mostly
screened by the intervening trees.
The existing view includes the tank farms on the south side of Riverside Avenue south of the site,
the power transmission lines along Riverside Avenue east of the site, the power generating plants
to the north of the site and part of the industrial Port of Albany. The majority of the site will be
screened by the trees along the ridge between the site and this location. The glimpse of the site is
brief, does not break the horizon line, is consistent with the character of the area and will be
difficult to discern through the trees, even during leaf-off conditions. There is no significant
impact to visual resources at this location (see also Photo 7 above).
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
18
6.1.9 42 Ridge Road, Rensselaer
Photo 9 (42 Ridge Road, Section N-N’): Ridge Road is a generally north-south trending road
located south of the Clinton Heights neighborhood on the ridge east of the site. This vantage
point offers one of the few views that exist for some of the residences through breaks or low spots
in the trees (see Stations 1+95 to 3+15 and 3+35 to 4+50 on Line of Sight Section N-N’)
southeast of the site. The views from homes further up the hill (behind the photo vantage point)
are screened by homes and trees in the community and on the ridge to the west.
This vantage point is the only observed view in this area. The community was driven out to
determine the location of publicly accessible vantage points but there may be a few additional
locations (e.g. in the back yards) that might have views towards the site.
This vantage point is near 42 Ridge Road. The homes in the foreground and behind the vantage
point of this photo are screened form the site by the intervening trees. The photo looks
northwesterly and the vantage point is about 5250 feet from the proposed silos, the tallest
structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a height of
approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). There is a limited view through
the intervening trees of the upper 10 feet of the silos from this vantage point; the lower part of the
silos and the rest of the site are screened from the location. The back yards were not accessible
but the upper part of the silos and parts of the plant and stockpile area are expected to be partially
visible from the backyards through thin spots or breaks in the trees during leaf-off conditions.
During leaf-on conditions, the site will be screened by the intervening trees
The existing view includes the power transmission lines along Riverside Avenue east of the site,
the power generating plants to the north of the site and part of the industrial Port of Albany. The
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
19
majority of the site will be screened by the trees along the ridge between the site and this location.
The glimpse of the site is brief, does not break the horizon line, is consistent with the character of
the area and will be difficult to discern through the trees, even during leaf-off conditions. There
is no significant impact to visual resources at this location.
6.1.10 SUNY Albany East, Rensselaer
Photo 10 (SUNY Albany Facility North of Columbia Turnpike, Section J-J’): The SUNY
Facility overlooks Columbia Turnpike and offers views to the southwest towards the site. This
vantage point is from the south side of the facility, reserved for truck deliveries to SUNY and
does not represent a location widely accessible or traveled by the public. The site is not visible if
the vantage point is moved a few feet in either direction and the site is not visible from the
northern and more public side of the facility.
This vantage point is the only observed view in the facility and in this area. This photo looks
southwesterly and the vantage point is about 3100 feet from the proposed silos, the tallest
structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a height of
approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper 15-20 feet of the
silos from this vantage point are visible above the treeline and against the backdrop of the
industrial Cargill facility on the west side of the Hudson River in the Port of Albany; the lower
part of the silos and the rest of the site are screened from the location. The limited view will not
change significantly during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes Columbia Turnpike, the water treatment plant in the foreground, the
power generating plants to the north of the site and part of the industrial Port of Albany. The
majority of the site will be screened by the trees along the north side of the site. The glimpse of
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
20
the site is brief, does not break the horizon line, is consistent with the character of the area and
will be against an existing industrial backdrop (the Cargill Facility), even during leaf-off
conditions. There is no significant impact to visual resources at this location.
6.1.11 3
rd
and Catherine Streets, Rensselaer
Photo 11 (3
rd
Street Near Intersection with Catherine Street, Section I-I’): Only one publicly
accessible viewpoint of a part of the site was found in the residential community north of
Partition Street. This vantage point is the east side of 3
rd
Street, just south of its intersection with
Catherine Street. The site is not visible if the vantage point is moved to the west side of the 3
rd
Street and is not visible from Pine Street, the next intersection to the south or to the north (where
3
rd
Street crests and drops off to the north). The orientations of the streets in this neighborhood
do not allow views towards the site (the local buildings intervene) except along 3
rd
Street.
This photo looks south-southwesterly and the vantage point is about 10,750 feet from the
proposed silos, the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which
was set at a height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper
10 feet of the silos from this vantage point are visible above the treeline and buildings just to the
right (west) of the green copper patina of the Rensselaer Train Station; the lower part of the silos
and the rest of the site are screened from the location. This extremely limited view will not
change significantly during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes the train station, much of the City of Rensselaer, local utility lines,
residences, several smokestacks, the power generating plants to the north of the site and part of
the industrial Port of Albany. The majority of the site will be screened by the trees along the
north side of the site. The glimpse of the site is brief, does not break the horizon line and is
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
21
consistent with the character of the area. The site is more than two miles from this location and
the balloons were difficult to identify even with the aid of binoculars. There is no significant
impact to visual resources at this location.
6.1.12 Overlook on Empire State Plaza
Photo 12 (Overlook on Empire State Plaza, Section E-E’): People at the overlook along the
eastern side of the Empire State Plaza from the South Corning Tower to the Egg has a limited
view of the top of the silos. Other ground level points in the Empire State Plaza do not have
views of the site.
This photo looks south-southeasterly and the vantage point is about 9,450 feet from the proposed
silos, the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a
height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper 10 feet of
the silos from this vantage point are visible above the treeline (see Stations 12+60 to 13+40 on
Line of Sight Section E-E’) and buildings just to the left (northeast) of the white fuel tank in the
center of the photo. This limited view will not change during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes a parking garage, a large part of the City of Albany, a small part of the
Port of Albany, part of the City of Rensselaer and the power generating plants to the north of the
site. The majority of the site will be screened by the trees along the north side of the site. The
glimpse of the site is brief, does not break the horizon line and is consistent with the character of
the area. The site is more than 1.75 miles from this location and the balloons were difficult to
identify even with the aid of binoculars. There is no significant impact to visual resources at this
location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
22
6.1.13 22 Liebel Street, Albany
Photo 13 (22 Liebel Street, City of Albany, Section D-D’): Very few publicly accessible
viewpoints were observed in the residential community south of 2
nd
Avenue in the City of
Albany. This vantage point is near 22 Liebel Street. The site is not visible if the vantage point is
moved a few feet in any direction. The orientations of the streets in this neighborhood do not
typically allow views towards the site (the local buildings intervene).
This photo looks southeasterly and the vantage point is about 6,650 feet from the proposed silos,
the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a
height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper 10 feet of
the silos from this vantage point are visible through the local trees (Stations 1+30 to 2+25 on Line
of Sight Section D-D’) and above the distant treeline and buildings and chain link fence; the
lower part of the silos and the rest of the site is screened from this location. This extremely
limited view will be screened during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes parts of the City of Albany, the power generating plants to the north of
the site and part of the industrial Port of Albany. The majority of the site will be screened by the
trees along the north side of the site. The glimpse of the site is brief, does not break the horizon
line and is consistent with the character of the area. The limited amount of the upper part of the
silos sticking above the distant treeline will be barely discernible at a distance of 6,650 feet (the
balloons were difficult to identify even with the aid of binoculars). There is no significant impact
to visual resources at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
23
6.1.14 Albany Community Charter School, Leonard Street
Photo 14 (Albany Community Charter School, Leonard Street, City of Albany, Section D-
D’): Very few publicly accessible viewpoints were observed in the residential community south
of 2
nd
Avenue in the City of Albany. This vantage point is on the corner of Leonard Street
adjacent to the Albany Community Charter School. The site is not visible if the vantage point is
moved a few feet in any direction, including the park and grassy areas in the foreground of this
photo.
This photo looks southeasterly and the vantage point is about 6,250 feet from the proposed silos,
the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a
height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper 5-10 feet of
the silos from this vantage point are visible through the utility lines and above the distant treeline
((see Station *+20 to 8+40 on Line of Sight Section D-D’); the lower part of the silos and the rest
of the site are significantly screened from this location even during leaf-off conditions. This
extremely limited view will be not change significantly during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes parts of the City of Albany, the power generating plants to the north of
the site and part of the industrial Port of Albany. The majority of the site will be screened by the
trees along the north side of the site. The glimpse of the site is brief, does not break the horizon
line and is consistent with the character of the area. The limited amount of the upper part of the
silos sticking above the distant treeline will be barely discernible at a distance of 6,250 feet (the
balloons were difficult to identify even with the aid of binoculars). There is no significant impact
to visual resources at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
24
6.1.15 Nutgrove Apartments, Albany
Photo 15 (Nutgrove Apartments, South of McCarty Avenue, City of Albany, Section C-C’):
This is the only publicly accessible viewpoint observed in this residential community. This
vantage point is on the south side of the Nutgrove Apartment complex located on the south side
of McCarty Avenue. The site is not visible if the vantage point is moved a few feet in any
direction. The top 10 feet of the silos will be visible through a partial screen of local trees along
the chain link fence; the remainder of the site will not be visible from this vantage point.
This photo looks southeasterly and the vantage point is about 5,600 feet from the proposed silos,
the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a
height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper 10 feet of
the silos from this vantage point are visible through the trees in the foreground (Stations 0+70 to
2+00 on Line of Sight Section C-C’) and above the distant treeline; the lower part of the silos and
the rest of the site are screened from this location during leaf-off conditions. This limited view
will be better screened by the vegetation in the foreground during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes parts of the City of Albany, I-787, the power generating plants to the
north of the site and part of the industrial Port of Albany. The majority of the site will be
screened by the trees along the north side of the site. The glimpse of the site is brief, does not
break the horizon line and is consistent with the character of the area. The limited amount of the
upper part of the silos sticking above the distant treeline will be barely discernible at a distance of
5,600 feet (the balloons were difficult to identify even with the aid of binoculars). There is no
significant impact to visual resources at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
25
6.1.16 Kenwood Convent, Albany
Photo 16 (Kenwood Convent, South of Kenwood Road, City of Albany, Section B-B’): The
Kenwood Convent is a National Historic Building. There are no views towards the site over most
of the grounds but there is a small opening through trees on the property to the east through which
the top of the silos could be viewed during leaf-off conditions. The site is not visible if the
vantage point is moved a few feet in any direction.
This photo looks east-southeasterly and the vantage point is about 5,600 feet from the proposed
silos, the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a
height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper 10 feet of
the silos from this vantage point are visible through the trees in the foreground (Stations 0+20 to
1+45 on Line of Sight Section B-B’) and above the distant treeline; the lower part of the silos and
the rest of the site are screened from this location during leaf-off conditions. This limited view
will be better screened by the vegetation in the foreground during leaf-on conditions.
The existing view includes the power generating plants to the north of the site and part of the
industrial Port of Albany. The majority of the site will be screened by the trees along the north
side of the site. The glimpse of the site is brief, does not break the horizon line and is consistent
with the character of the area. The limited amount of the upper part of the silos sticking above
the distant treeline will be barely discernible at a distance of 5,600 feet (the balloons were
difficult to identify even with the aid of binoculars). There is no significant impact to visual
resources at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
26
6.1.17 Island Creek Park, Albany
Photo 17 (Island Creek Park, Port of Albany, Section F-F’): Island Creek Park is a small
riverfront park with a river overlook. There are no views towards the site over most of the
grounds but the top 5-10 feet of the silos are visible under the power transmission lines and above
the distant treeline at the river overlook.
This photo looks south-southeasterly and the vantage point is about 4,400 feet from the proposed
silos, the tallest structures on the site (the red arrow points to the upper balloon which was set at a
height of approximately 89 feet, about five feet above the top of the silos). The upper 10 feet of
the silos from this vantage point are visible beneath the power transmission lines and above the
treeline along the east bank of the Hudson River during both leaf-on and leaf-off conditions.
The existing view includes an almost total view of the former BASF site, the power generating
plants to the north of the site, the scrap recycling yard and the part of the tank farms in the
industrial Port of Rensselaer. The majority of the site will be screened by the trees along the
north side of the site. The glimpse of the site is brief, does not break the horizon line and is
consistent with the character of the area. The limited amount of the upper part of the silos
sticking above the distant treeline will be barely discernible at a distance of 4,400 feet (the
balloons were difficult to identify even with the aid of binoculars) and will get lost in the clutter
of the trees and the power transmission lines. There is no significant impact to visual resources
at this location.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant: Visual Impact Assessment, May 2011
27
APPENDIX
NOTE: Visual Base Map dated April 22, 2011
Line of Sight Sections dated April 22, 2011 (two sheets)
Are large oversized maps and are attached as separate files.
MAY 9, 2011 LETTER TO SARAH CROWELL
1
Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
8 Brunswick Road Troy, New York 12180
Phone: (518) 270-5920 Fax: (518) 270-5922
May 9, 2011
Sarah Stern Crowell, AICP, Director
Office of Planning and Development
City of Rensselaer
62 Washington Street
Rensselaer, New York 12144
Re. New Castle Asphalt, LLC—Proposed Blacktop Plant
Dear Ms. Crowell:
The following letter is provided in response to draft Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental
Assessment Form (EAF) provided to us on April 7, 2011. This document provided a preliminary
assessment of the potential impacts of the project and identified potential significant impacts. In
addition, the discussion of the EAF on April 7
th
included a request that additional studies be
completed.
The information below responds to the issues raised AND points out pertinent information
already provided in the application. The item numbers mirror the corresponding sections of Part
3 of the EAF.
Item 4: Potential Impact on Groundwater
This section identifies as potential impacts:
Discharge of sanitary wastewater to groundwater from a septic system located
adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; and
Storage of petroleum or chemical products over groundwater or an aquifer.
This section indicates that upon approval and implementation the mitigating measures will reduce
this impact to not significant and not adverse but identifies the impact as adverse in another
section. On-site soil conditions are not suited for a traditional leach field and a raised bed or
equivalent system will be required. The County Department of Health (DOH) has jurisdiction
over and will review and approve the septic system. County DOH requirements allow septic
leach fields in 100-year floodplains with special provisions to address the one percent possibility
of a flood. DOH approval carries a presumption of no significant impact. We request that the
final EAF be revised as there is no significant potential to impact groundwater, especially since
there are no known groundwater users that could be impacted. Further, we request that the City
approval not be delayed until County DOH approval is obtained. The City can approve this
project with a condition stating that County DOH approval of the septic system must be obtained.
The project, as designed and proposed, will not have a significant adverse impact on
groundwater. The best management practices outlined in the application (e.g. storage of
petroleum products in secondary containment, fueling and loading on impermeable pads, etc.) are
2
standard practice at blacktop plants and will reduce the impact to not significant, as stated in the
EAF.
Item 5: Potential Impact on Flooding
This section identifies as potential impacts:
A concrete pad with “spray bars”;
A septic leach field that will have tiles below the elevation of the 100-year floodplain
and this could impact the water quality of the Hudson River; and
Floodwater will continue to impact the part of Riverside Avenue adjacent to the site.
This section recommends relocating the septic leach field and identifies the impact as adverse.
Although not specifically listed in the EAF as a significant impact, we would like to clarify the
purpose of the concrete pad with spray bars. Trucks coming to the site for blacktop will stop on
the concrete pad before receiving a load of blacktop. At the concrete pad an automated system
controlled by the plant operator will apply a small amount of an EPA approved product to the
beds of the trucks. This product keeps the blacktop from sticking to the truck beds. The amount
applied is automatically controlled by the plant operator to prevent spillage or minor dripping.
This best management practice does not contribute to any significant impact to flooding.
This site will generate approximately the same amount of septic wastewater as a single family-
residence. It is not cost-effective or practical for such a small project to extend the sanitary sewer
lines to the site. The septic leach field will not have tiles below the elevation of the 100-year
floodplain. The soil conditions are not suited for a traditional leach field and a raised bed or
equivalent system will be required. The County Department of Health (DOH) has jurisdiction
over and will review and approve the septic system. County DOH requirements allow septic
leach fields in 100-year floodplains with special provisions to address the one percent possibility
of a flood. We request that the EAF be revised as there is no significant potential to impact
groundwater, especially since there are no known groundwater users that could be impacted.
Further, we request that the City approval not be delayed until County DOH approval is obtained.
The City can approve this project with a condition stating that County DOH approval of the septic
system must be obtained. Such approval carries a presumption of no significant impact and
certainly will not have a significant impact on flooding.
The application includes an assessment of the impact on flooding that concludes that the project
will not significantly raise flood water levels and thus, meets the City’s Flood Damage Control
regulation, as stated in the EAF.
Section 6: Potential Impact on Air
This section identifies as potential impacts:
The potential to emit more one or more greenhouses gases at significant levels;
The potential to generate more than 10 tons per year of a designated hazardous air
pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of a combination of hazardous air pollutants;
The project may require a state air application, produce total air emissions more than
5 pounds per hour or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10
million BTUs per hour;
The project may consume more than 100,000 gallons of fuel per year;
The project may use more than 2,500 MW hours of electricity per year;
The project may reach 50% of any two of the above stated air emission thresholds;
and
Wind may carry emissions to nearby residences.
3
The potential impact is listed as unknown by the City on the EAF.
The project will not emit 1000 tons per year of carbon dioxide, 3.5 tons per year of nitrous oxide,
1000 tons per year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons, 0.045 tons per year of sulfur
hexafluoride, more than 1000 tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent
hydrochlorofluorcarbons, 43 tons per year of methane, 10 tons per year of any one designated
hazardous air pollutant (HAP) or 25 tons per year of any combination of HAP, does not have an
emission rate or more than 5 pounds per hour, will not produce more than 10 million BTUs per
hour and will not use more than 2500 MW hours of electricity per year and will not exceed 50%
of any of the two emission thresholds.
An air permit registration was submitted to NYSDEC, the recognized authority on air approvals.
NYSDEC indicated the air registration is not subject to public review because it is a minor source
that requires only an air registration, the lowest form of approval granted by NYSDEC (see chart
on following page describing the various levels of air approvals). Blacktop plants have high
degrees of emission control and are small sources of emissions. The fact that the proposed plant
requires an air registration from NYSDEC is proof that it is not
a significant source of air
emissions.
All air emissions can potentially travel to a residence. This is not a valid means of assessing
potential air impacts. The proper way of assessing air impacts is to determine whether the
concentration or rate of air emissions will have the potential to significantly impact air quality.
NYSDEC is the recognized expert on this subject and the fact that NYSDEC requires only an air
registration for this limited scope project is proof that it is not a significant source of air
emissions.
Section 7: Potential Impact on Plants and Animals
This section identifies as potential impacts:
May cause reduction or loss of individuals of endangered or threatened species that
use the site or are found on, over or near the site;
May result in reduction or degradation of any habitat used by rare, threatened or
endangered species;
May cause reduction or loss of individuals of special concern or conservation need
species that use the site or are found on, over or near the site;
May result in reduction or degradation of any habitat used by special concern or
conservation need species;
May result in the removal or ground disturbance of any a portion of a designated
significant natural community; and
May significantly interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging or over-wintering habitat
for the predominant species that occupies or uses the site.
The potential impact is listed as unknown by the City on the EAF.
The site has been historically used for industrial purposes and was recently used as a construction
lay down and parking area during the construction of the nearby power plant. The site is covered
by a layer of crushed stone that in turn overlies a layer of older fill.
We contacted NYSDEC when we began this project and were told that although there are
significant species that have been identified in the area that since the site had been previously
disturbed there was no potential to impact any species or habitat. No significant habitat exists on
the site—the site is almost exclusively covered by a barren layer of crushed stone. No potential
impacts to plants and wildlife can occur.
4
GENERALIZED OVERVIEW OF LEVELS OF NYSDEC AIR APPROVALS
Type of Approval Emission Limits (Per Year) Project Applicability Level of Environmental Review
Title V Permit
1
1. More than 100 tons of regulated air
pollutants (PM
2.5
, PM
10
, NO
x
, SO
x
, CO) and 50
tons of VOCs
2. More than 100,000 tons of CO
2
equivalent
greenhouse gases
3. More than 10 tons of any single hazardous
air pollutant
4. More than 25 tons of any combination of
hazardous air pollutants
Not applicable
Major air emission source, Type I action
and typically requires a DEIS
State Facility Permit
2
1. Between 50 and 100 tons of regulated air
pollutants (PM
2.5
, PM
10
, NO
x
, , SO
x
, CO) and
25 and 50 tons of VOCs
2. Between 5 and 10 tons of any single
hazardous air pollutant
3. Between 12.5 and 25 tons of any
combination of hazardous air pollutants
Not applicable
Type I action, typically does not require a
DEIS
Minor Facility
Registration
3
1. Less than 50 tons of regulated air pollutants
(PM
2.5
, PM
10
, NO
x
, VOC, SO
x
, CO) and 25
tons of VOCs
2. Less than 5 tons of any single hazardous air
pollutant
3. Less than 12.5 tons of any combination of
hazardous air pollutants
Applicable
Minor air emission sources—ministerial
action under SEQRA
Exempt or Trivial
Activity
4
- Not applicable No air approval required
1
See Subpart 201-6 at http://www.dec.ny.gov/regs/13539.html
2
See Subpart 201-5 at http://www.dec.ny.gov/regs/4301.html
3
See Subpart 201-4 at http://www.dec.ny.gov/regs/4302.html
4
See Subpart 201-3.2 and 3.3 at http://www.dec.ny.gov/regs/4303.html
5
Section 9: Potential Impact on Aesthetic Resources
This section identifies as potential impacts:
Project may be visible from officially designated aesthetic resources such as Island
Park Creek, Corning Preserve and the Hudson River;
Project may be visible seasonally or year-round from publicly-accessible vantage
points such as the proposed bike trail and scenic overlook; and
Viewers engaged in recreational or tourist activities may view the project.
The EAF further states that a potentially large number of people in Rensselaer, Albany and on the
Hudson River may be impacted, the geographic extent of the impact will include the reach of the
Hudson River from which the site might be visible (as well as the southern end of the proposed
bike path) and the industrial use of the site does not diverge from local needs and goals related to
aesthetic resources.
The applicant is completing a Visual Study in accordance with the NYSDEC Visual Policy. This
study included computer terrain modeling, a balloon test to represent the full height of the tallest
proposed structure, field inspection of potential views during leaf-off (worst-case visibility)
conditions from the surrounding community and assessment of potential views form areas of
identified visibility. In addition, an archeological historian assessed all structures with a potential
view of the site for eligibility for inclusion on the National and State Registers of Historic Places.
The assessment of potential impacts on aesthetic resources is not a simple matter of determining
whether a project is visible. The assessment considers the setting (in this case, the middle of the
industrial Port of Rensselaer), compliance with comprehensive plans, the nature and duration of
any views, the seasonality of the views and the location of significant resources. The fact that a
site or a portion of a site is visible does not mean the project will have a significant adverse
impact.
This project is located in the middle of the industrial Port of Rensselaer and across the river from
the industrial Port of Albany. The site is surrounded by a scrap metal yard, two large power
generating plants and an even larger series of industrial fuel tank farms and related commercial
and industrial uses. The west side of the Hudson River contains similarly diverse industrial uses.
The nearest residential communities are located approximately 1800 and over 3500 feet from the
site on the other side of the existing industrial uses that surround the site.
The City’s comprehensive plan and zoning identifies this site as intended for continued industrial
use. The comprehensive plan and riverfront revitalization plan calls for providing opportunities
for access to the river, a recreational bike path through the industrial area and an overlook of the
industrial Port of Albany. The proposed project is consistent with the comprehensive plan and
riverfront revitalization plan because it continues the industrial use of the site and employs best
management practices such as revegetation of disturbed areas, proper site design and layout,
landscaping, maintenance of green space and perimeter wooded areas, etc.
The visual assessment of the site indicates that even the highest point of the proposed blacktop
plant is visible from very few locations even during leaf-off conditions. Few of the locations
from which the plant was visible will have year-round views; almost all will be screened during
leaf-on conditions when the site will be in operation. Further, the few locations with views had
very brief glimpses of the top of the silo and could not see the vast majority of the site. The
remote location of the plant relative to potential receptors further mitigates any potential impacts:
the limited views of the plant are difficult to discern at the great distances to the limited number
of potential receptors.
6
The officially adopted City plans call for the construction of a bike path and overlook adjacent to
the site. The application accounts for and was designed to accommodate these features. These
features will be built shortly and the proposed project does not interfere with either the bike path
or the overlook. The officially adopted plans recognized that these recreational features would go
through an industrial area and specifically stated that they should not interfere with the ongoing
or future industrial uses. The purpose of the overlook is to provide a viewing point for the
industrial Port of Albany and the Port of Albany turning basin. To say that an adjacent industrial
use in an area that has historically been used for industrial purposes, that is intended to be used
for industrial purposes and that is surrounded by other industrial uses contradicts the conclusions
reached in Section 11 of the EAF (“As local plans call for a bike trail to pass through an area
zoned for industry, this impact does not diverge from local needs and goals”).
Section 10: Potential Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources
This section identifies as potential impacts:
Proposed action may occur within or contiguous to a site which is listed on the State
or National Register of Historic Places;
Project is located within an area designated as sensitive for archeological sites; and
Project may destroy or alter part of a site or property containing significant historic or
archeological resources and may alter the property’s setting or environment.
The potential impact is listed as unknown by the City on the EAF.
The applicant is preparing a Cultural Resources investigation for the project. The preliminary
investigation indicates there are no significant impacts to identified cultural resources and the
site-specific subsurface investigation will be concluded shortly. The likelihood of a potential
impact is small since the site has been used for industrial purposes in the past and has largely
been previously disturbed by the placement of at least two levels of fill. The last level of fill was
placed by Besicorp during the construction of the adjacent plant. The site was graded and
covered by a layer of crusher run to serve as a lay down and parking area. Besicorp was not
required to perform an archeological assessment because of the prior history of disturbance but
instead was required to stop work if any archeological resources were identified during site work..
Section 13: Potential Impact on Transportation
This section identifies as potential impacts:
The project may cause the Level of Service of the intersection of South Street and the
ramp to Routes 9 and 20 northbound (westbound) falling below Level of Service C;
and
Project traffic may exceed the capacity of the existing road network at the
intersection of South Street and the ramp to Route 9 and 20 northbound (westbound).
The potential impact is listed as unknown by the City on the EAF.
A supplemental traffic assessment of the intersection has been prepared by Creighton Manning
Engineers (CME). The Level of Service at this intersection will not change due to the addition of
the project’s truck traffic. The Level of Service is controlled by the amount of traffic on Routes 9
and 20, particularly during peak hours. The Port Expressway was specifically built to alleviate
traffic issues in the industrial Port of Rensselaer and has historically handled traffic volumes
much higher than that proposed by New Castle. CME’s study concludes that the intersection in
question will perform adequately and will not be adversely impacted by the project.
Section 14: Potential Impact on Energy
This section identifies as potential impacts:
7
Insufficient capacity to allow connection to gas and electricity;
Project may require an upgrade of an existing or construction of a new substation;
Project may require extension of an energy transmission system; and
Project does not incorporate on-site renewable energy sources.
There is no indication there is insufficient capacity to connect to the adjacent gas and electrical
services and no indication this relatively minor user will require construction of a new substation
or upgrading of an existing substation. The site is adjacent to a series of transmission lines so the
only added infrastructure would be the connection. The electrical lines already extend to the site
so this would require minimal work.
The project is not well-suited for using on-site renewable energy sources. There is very little free
space on-site so it would not be practical to set up a large array of solar panels of a wind turbine.
In fact, to do so would be almost as much of a project as building the blacktop plant. There is no
usable hydroelectric power on site. The project proposes to use the available adjacent gas and
electrical services, both of which are widely recognized as clean energy sources. The blacktop
plant will be state of the art and more fuel efficient and cleaner than the older plants that are
currently serving this market. Construction of this plant will not create additional demand for
blacktop but it will reduce overall emissions by reducing the distance traveled by trucks to and
from the blacktop plant and by having a cleaner, more fuel efficient plant. Overall, this plant will
reduce energy consumption.
In addition, this plant will be more capable of fully using recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) in the
blacktop. This reduces the need for asphalt, requires less energy to make blacktop and
incorporates a potential waste product into a valuable and salable product.
Energy will not be significantly impacted by the project.
Section 15: Potential Impact on Odor and Light
This section identifies as potential impacts:
The project may create odors;
The project may cause bright lights to shine onto adjoining properties; and
Prevailing winds may carry odors to nearby residences.
The potential impact is listed as unknown by the City on the EAF.
These potential impacts were addressed in the application. The proposed plant will be state of the
art and incorporates technology to prevent odors and blue smoke.
A lighting plan was submitted with the application and all lights were hooded and shown only on
the site. Further:
There are no residences or receptors adjacent to the site that could be impacted by the
limited lights to be used at the site;
The site is located in the middle of an industrial zoned area surrounded by other more
intensive industrial uses—these uses employ lighting to a much greater extent than
the proposed blacktop plant; and
The site will typically only operate at night when supplying a project mandated
(typically NYSDOT) paving job. Nighttime paving is done to reduce impacts to the
driving public and benefits everyone.
The project will not produce odors and lighting will not be a significant impact.
8
Section 16: Potential Impact on Human Health
This section identifies as potential impacts:
There is a completed emergency spill remediation on or adjacent to the site;
The site has an institutional control limiting use of the property;
The project may affect institutional controls put in place to ensure the site is
protective of the environment and human health; and
The project will be within 2000 feet of a site used for disposal of solid or hazardous
waste.
The potential impact is listed as unknown by the City on the EAF.
The presence of a spill remediation on or adjacent to the site or the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste on other sites is not relevant to an assessment of the potential impacts of this project. The
BASF site is located more than 2000 feet north of the site but construction and operation of a
blacktop plant on our property will not affect the remediation done on that property or any other
properties. There will be no export of on-site materials from this property. The on-site materials
will be graded and used on site.
The only known institutional controls limiting the use of the site are: (1) the bike path and
overlook which are outside the limits of the project and were purposely avoided by the project;
and (2) the easements for utilities which were identified and purposely avoided during the design
and layout of the property. The only interaction between easements and the projects will be
where the access roads cross such easements and this crossing is not contravened by the
easements and will in no way impact the utilities that are the subject of the easements.
Human health will not be significantly impacted by the project.
Section 18: Potential Impact on Community Character
This section identifies as potential impacts:
The project may replace or eliminate existing historic structures of importance to the
community;
The project may increase demand for community services (schools, police and fire);
and
The project may create or eliminate employment.
The potential impact is listed as unknown by the City on the EAF. The EAF also states that the
site is an industrial use in an area zoned “Industry” and that local fire, EMS and police
departments are staffed and equipped to protect industrial installations. The reasoning for listing
this potential impact as unknown is related to the potential for historic structures.
The site has been previously disturbed, most recently having been graded and covered by a layer
of crusher run to serve as a lay down and parking area for the construction of the adjacent power
generating plant. A cultural resources investigation is being performed and no evidence of
historical structures has been found on the site to date. The likelihood of finding such structures
is small since the site has been disturbed on several occasions in the past. Further, the site is
zoned industrial, has been used for industrial purposes in the past and the comprehensive and
riverfront revitalization plans both cal for its continued industrial use. By definition, projects that
comply with the locally adopted planning documents cannot have a significant impact on
community character.
No potential impacts to the bike path or overlook will occur, as outlined in Section 9 above.
9
Community character will not be significantly impacted by the project.
* * *
Please call me or Mark Visscher anytime if you have any questions about this document or the
project.
Cordially,
Paul H. Griggs, Principal Geologist
Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
Enc.
Cc. Steve Griffen, Jack Rifenburg, Roddy Valente, Joe Zappone
Z:\clients\New Castle Asphalt\Rensselaer-2\Letters\Crowell 5'9'11.doc
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT
APPROVAL
FEBRUARY 15, 2011 LETTER TO BUILDING AND ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR
G-L Engineering, P.C.
8 Brunswick Road Troy, New York 12180
Phone: (518) 270-5920 Fax: (518) 270-5922
February 15, 2011
Daniel Moore, Building & Zoning Administrator
Office of Building Department
City Hall, 62 Washington Street
Rensselaer, New York 12144-2696
Re. New Castle Asphalt, LLC—Proposed Blacktop Plant in Port of Rensselaer
Dear Mr. Moore:
The following information is provided in support of New Castle Asphalt, LLC’s application to
construct and operate a blacktop plant on the west side of Riverside Avenue and the north side of
the Irwin Stewart Port Expressway in the Port of Rensselaer.
Enclosed for your review are two copies of the following for the above referenced project:
Floodplain Development Permit Application
Environmental Assessment Form
Site Plan Maps showing the area of filling in the floodplain
Calculations supporting this floodplain certification
This information is also included in the Site Plan application submitted today.
Site activities will include an entrance road/perimeter access road, a stockpile area, perimeter
berms, the blacktop plant, a lab and plant control room, employee parking areas and stormwater
control features including stormwater basins, ditches and related features. These features are
shown on the attached Site Plan.
The site is owned by the Albany-Rensselaer Port District Commission and is leased to the
applicant, New Castle, Asphalt, LLC. It is located on Tax Parcel 154-5-3.
The attached Site Plan Map (Existing Conditions) shows the existing conditions of the site. In
general, the site grades gently from an approximate high elevation of 25 feet above mean sea
level at the top of the bank along the Hudson River down to an elevation of approximately 19 feet
along an active railroad spur on the east side of the property. The easternmost part of the site
grades up slightly towards Riverside Avenue.
The elevation of the 100-year flood is about 19 feet above mean sea level to the south of the site
to about 20 feet to the north of the site. The site has been laid out so that no structures are located
in the 100-year floodplain. Approximately 1050 cubic yards of fill will be placed in the 100-year
floodplain area. The displacement of potential floodwaters by the fill (entrance/perimeter access
2
road and some of the perimeter berms along the eastern side of the site) will result in no
significant increase in the flood level (see attached calculations).
Please call me anytime if you have any questions.
Cordially,
Mark Visscher, P.E.
Senior Engineer
G-L Engineering, P.C.
Enc.
Z:\clients\New Castle Asphalt\Rensselaer-2\Letters\Moore Floodplain 2'15'11.doc
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
CREIGHTON MANNING TRAFFIC STUDIES
CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATION
NOTE: ALL OVERSIZED DRAWINGS IN SEPARATE FILES
NYSDEC AIR REGISTRATION APPLICATION, STOCKPILE MAINTENANCE
PLAN AND FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Facility Registration
DEC ID
Owner/Firm
Taxpayer ID
2 7 3 4 5 7 8 8 9
Name
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
Street Address
118 Button Road
City / Town / Village
Waterford
State or Province
NY
Country
USA
Zip
12188
Owner/Firm Contact
Name
Roderick J. Valente Phone No. (518) 432-4470
Facility
Name
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
Location Address
37 Riverside Avenue
City / Town / Village
Rensselaer
Zip
12144
Facility Information
Total Number of Emission Points: 1 X Cap by Rule
Description
This application is for a new Air Facility Registration. The facility includes a 400 ton per hour hot mix asphalt drum plant
that can be fueled by natural gas, recycled oil or fuel oil. The maximum 12 month rolling average of criterial pollutants
will be capped at less than 50% of the Title V threshold for all criteria pollutants, and is, therefore,
subject to Cap by Rule.
Standard Industrial Classification Codes
2951
HAP CAS Numbers
75 - 07 - 0 71 - 43 - 2 100 - 41 - 4 50 - 00 - 0 91 - 20 - 3 106 - 51 - 4
108 - 88 - 3 1330 - 20 - 7 - - - - - - - -
Applicable Federal and New York State Requirements (Part Nos.)
201 202 211 212 215 225
40 CFR 60
Certification
I certify that this facility will be operated in conformance with all provisions of existing regulations.
Responsible Official Title
Signature Date / /
7/29/96
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID APPLICATION ID OFFICE USE ONLY
- - / / /
Section I - Certification
Title V Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons
directly responsible for gathering the information [required pursuant to 6 NYCRR 201-6.3(d)] I believe the information is, true, accurate and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations.
Responsible Official Title
Signature Date / /
State Facility Certification
I certify that this facility will be operated in conformance with all provisions of existing regulations.
Responsible Official
Roderick J. Valente
Title
Managing Member
Signature Date / /
Section II - Identification Information
Title V Facility Permit
New Significant Modification Administrative Amendment
Renewal Minor Modification General Permit Title:
State Facility Permit
X New Modification
General Permit Title:
Application involves construction of new facility Application involves construction of new emission unit(s)
Owner/Firm
Name
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
Street Address
118 Button Road
City
Waterford
State
NY
Country
USA
Zip
12188
Owner Classification Federal State Municipal
X Corporation/Partnership Individual
Taxpayer ID
2 7 3 4 5 7 8 8 9
Facility Confidential
Name
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
Location Address
37 Riverside Avenue
X City / Town/Village Rensselaer
Zip
12144
Project Description Continuation Sheet(s)
This application is for a new Air Facility Registration. The facility includes a 400 ton per hour hot mix asphalt drum plant
that will be fired by either natural gas, recycled oil or fuel oil. Power will be supplied by line power. The facility also will include a
hammer mill crusher that will be used to process RAP. The crusher will be powered by line power and will be part of the hot mix plant.
The facility will be capped below 50% of the Title V thresholds.
Owner/Firm Contact Mailing Address
Name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
Valente, Roddy Phone No. (518) 432-4470
Affiliation
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
Title
Member Fax No.
Street Address
118 Button Road
City
Waterford
State
NY
Country
USA
Zip
12188
Facility Contact Mailing Address
Name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
Valente, Roddy Phone No. (518) 432-4470
Affiliation
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
Title
Member Fax No.
Street Address
118 Button Road
City
Waterford
State
NY
Country
USA
Zip
12188
12/21/01 Page 1
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section III - Facility Information
Classification
Hospital Residential Educational/Institutional Commercial X Industrial Utility
Affected States (Title V Only)
Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Pennsylvania Tribal Land:
New Hampshire Connecticut New Jersey Ohio Tribal Land:
SIC Codes
2951
Facility Description Continuation Sheet(s)
This is a hot mix asphaltic concrete producing facility. It has one asphalt plant operating on-site that is fueled
by one of three fuels: natural gas, recycled oil and No. 2 fuel oil. The asphalt plant will be powered by line power.
It also has a hammer mill crusher powered by line power that will be used to process RAP.
Compliance Statements (Title V Only)
I certify that as of the date of this application the facility is in compliance with all applicable requirements: YES NO
If one or more emission units at the facility are not in compliance with all applicable requirements at the time of signing this application (the ‘NO’
box must be checked), the noncomplying units must be identified in the “Compliance Plan” block on page 8 of this form along with the compliance
plan information required. For all emission units at this facility that are operating in compliance with all applicable requirements complete the
following:
This facility will continue to be operated and maintained in such a manner as to assure compliance for the duration of the permit, except
those units referenced in the compliance plan portion of Section IV of this application.
For all emission units, subject to any applicable requirements that will become effective during the term of the permit, this facility will meet
all such requirements on a timely basis.
Compliance certification reports will be submitted at least once a year. Each report will certify compliance status with respect to each
requirement, and the method used to determine the status.
Facility Applicable Federal Requirements Continuation Sheet(s)
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
6 NYCRR 201 7 2
6 NYCRR 211 3
6 NYCRR 212 10
6 NYCRR 215
6 NYCRR 225 1
6 NYCRR 225 2
Facility State Only Requirements Continuation Sheet(s)
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
12/21/01 Page 2
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section III - Facility Information (continued)
Facility Compliance Certification Continuation Sheet(s)
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
6 NYCRR 201 7 2 a
X App lic ab le Fe deral R eq uire m ent
State O n ly R equirem ent
X C app ing
CAS No. Contaminant Name
630 - 08 - 0 Carbon Monoxide
Monitoring Information
Ambient Air Monitoring Work Practice Involving Specific Operations X Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
The facility is a hot mix asphalt producing facility. The facility will cap the emissions of Carbon Monoxide to less than
25 tons by limiting asphalt production to 350,000 tons during any 12 month rolling period.
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
24.9 34 tons
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code Description Code Description Code Description
17
annual maximum rolled
monthly
05 monthly 10
annually
Facility Emissions Summary X Continuation Sheet(s)
CAS No. Contaminant Name
PTE
Actual
(lbs/yr)
(lbs/yr)
Range
Code
NY075 - 00 - 5 PM-10 B
NY075 - 00 - 0 PARTICULATES
7446 - 09 - 5 SULFUR DIOXIDE B
NY210 - 00 - 0 OXIDES OF NITROGEN B
630 - 08 - 0 CARBON MONOXIDE 49,900
7439 - 92 - 1 LEAD Y
NY998 - 00 - 0 VOC B
NY100 - 00 - 0 HAP Y
75 - 07 - 0 Acetaldehyde Y
71 - 43 - 2 Benzene Y
100 - 41 - 4 Ethyl Benzene Y
50 - 00 - 0 Formaldehyde Y
12/21/01 Page 3
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section III - Facility Information
Facility Emissions Summary (continuation)
CAS No. Contaminant Name
PTE
Actual
(lbs/yr)
(lbs/yr)
Range
Code
91 - 20 - 3 Naphthalene Y
106 - 51 - 4 Quinone Y
108 - 88 - 3 Toluene Y
1330 - 20 - 7 Xylene Y
- -
Arsenic Y
- -
Barium Y
- -
Beryllium Y
- -
Cadmium Y
- -
Chromium Y
- -
Copper Y
- -
Hexavalent chromium Y
- -
Manganese Y
- -
Mercury Y
- -
Nickel Y
- -
Selenium Y
- -
Silver Y
- -
Zinc Y
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
12/21/01 Page 4
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Emission Unit Description Continuation Sheet(s)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
Emission Unit 1-NEWCA is composed of a 400 ton hot mix asphalt drum plant and associated control
equipment used in the production of asphaltic concrete. The hot mix plant is fueled by either natural gas,
recycled oil or fuel oil. Power is supplied by line power. A hammer mill crusher attached to the asphalt plant will
be used to process RAP for use in hot mix asphalt production.
Building Continuation Sheet(s)
Building Building Name Length (ft) Width (ft) Orientation
Emission Point Continuation Sheet(s)
EMISSION PT.
0 0 0 0 1
Ground Elev.
(ft)
Height
(ft)
Height Above
Structure (ft)
Inside Diameter
(in)
Exit Temp.
(EF)
Cross Section
Length (in) Width (in)
22 35.5 61 225
Exit Velocity
(FPS)
Exit Flow
(ACFM)
NYTM (E)
(KM)
NYTM (N)
(KM)
Building
Distance to
Property Line
(ft)
Date of
Removal
46 55,855
EMISSION PT.
Ground Elev.
(ft)
Height
(ft)
Height Above
Structure (ft)
Inside Diameter
(in)
Exit Temp.
(EF)
Cross Section
Length (in) Width (in)
Exit Velocity
(FPS)
Exit Flow
(ACFM)
NYTM (E)
(KM)
NYTM (N)
(KM)
Building
Distance to
Property Line
(ft)
Date of
Removal
Emission Source/Control Continuation Sheet(s)
Emission Source
Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
HMA01 I 01/01/11 04/15/11 Gencor 400 ton per hour
HMA Plant
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
400 9 tons per hour
Emission Source
Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
00BH1 K 01/01/11 04/15/11 016 Fabric Collector
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
12/21/01 Page 5
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
EMISSION UNIT
Emission Source/Control (continuation)
1 - N E W C A
Emission Source Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
00CR1 I 01/01/11 04/15/11 Schutte-Buffalo RC 2232
Hammer Mill
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
60 9 tons per hour
Emission Source Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
Emission Source Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
Emission Source Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
Emission Source Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
Emission Source Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
Emission Source Date of
Construction
Date of
Operation
Date of
Removal
Control Type
Manufacturer’s Name/Model No.
ID Type Code Description
Design
Capacity
Design Capacity Units Waste Feed Waste Type
Code Description Code Description Code Description
12/21/01 Page 6
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information (continued)
Process Information Continuation Sheet(s)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
G A S
Description
Aggregate is dried in a rotary dryer fueled by natural gas. The dried
aggregate is mixed with hot liquid asphalt in the dryer and is discharged into a slat conveyor. The slat conveyor
carries the asphalt up to a storage silo for later discharge.
Source Classification
Code (SCC)
Total Thruput Thruput Quantity Units
Quantity/Hr Quantity/Yr Code Description
30500205 200,000 38 tons per year
Confidential
Operating at Maximum Capacity
Activity with Insignificant Emissions
Operating Schedule
Building Floor/Location
Hrs/Day Days/Yr
4 125 Ground
Emission Source/Control Identifier(s)
HMA01 00BH1
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
R A P
Description
Milled or ripped up asphalt pavement is sent through a hammer mill crusher for use in the production of hot mix asphalt.
Source Classification
Code (SCC)
Total Thruput Thruput Quantity Units
Quantity/Hr Quantity/Yr Code Description
30502004 216,000 38 tons per year
Confidential
Operating at Maximum Capacity
Activity with Insignificant Emissions
Operating Schedule
Building Floor/Location
Hrs/Day Days/Yr
12 300
Emission Source/Control Identifier(s)
00CR1
12/21/01 Page 7
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information (continued)
Process Information Continuation Sheet(s)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
W O F
Description
Aggregate is dried in a rotary dryer fueled by recycled oil. The dried
aggregate is mixed with hot liquid asphalt in the dryer and is discharged into a slat conveyor. The slat conveyor
carries the asphalt up to a storage silo for later discharge.
Source Classification
Code (SCC)
Total Thruput Thruput Quantity Units
Quantity/Hr Quantity/Yr Code Description
30500205 100,000 38 tons per year
Confidential
Operating at Maximum Capacity
Activity with Insignificant Emissions
Operating Schedule
Building Floor/Location
Hrs/Day Days/Yr
4 63 Ground
Emission Source/Control Identifier(s)
HMA01 00BH1
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
N O 2
Description
Aggregate is dried in a rotary dryer fueled by fuel oil. The dried
aggregate is mixed with hot liquid asphalt in the dryer and is discharged into a slat conveyor. The slat conveyor
carries the asphalt up to a storage silo for later discharge.
Source Classification
Code (SCC)
Total Thruput Thruput Quantity Units
Quantity/Hr Quantity/Yr Code Description
30500205 50,000 38 tons per year
Confidential
Operating at Maximum Capacity
Activity with Insignificant Emissions
Operating Schedule
Building Floor/Location
Hrs/Day Days/Yr
4 31
Emission Source/Control Identifier(s)
12/21/01 Page 8
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information (continued)
Emission
Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
Emission Unit Applicable Federal Requirements Continuation Sheet(s)
Title Type Part
Sub
Part
Section Sub Division Parag. Sub Parag. Clause Sub Clause
1 - NEWCA 00001 GAS HMA01 6 NYCRR 201 5 1
1 - NEWCA 00001 GAS HMA01 6 NYCRR 201 7 2
1 - NEWCA 00001 GAS HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 10 a 2
1 - NEWCA 00001 GAS HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 3 a
1 - NEWCA 00001 GAS HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 6 a
Emission
Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
Emission Unit State Only Requirements Continuation Sheet(s)
Title Type Part
Sub
Part
Section Sub Division Parag. Sub Parag. Clause Sub Clause
-
-
-
Emission Unit Compliance Certification X Continuation Sheet(s)
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
Applicable Federal Requirement State Only Requirement
X Capping
Emission Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
CAS No. Contaminant Name
Monitoring Information
Continuous Emission Monitoring
Intermittent Emission Testing
Ambient Air Monitoring
Monitoring of Process or Control Device Parameters as Surrogate
Work Practice Involving Specific Operations
Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code Description Code Description Code Description
12/21/01 Page 9
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Emission
Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
Emission Unit Applicable Federal Requirements (continuation)
Title Type Part
Sub
Part
Section
Sub
Division
Parag. Sub Parag. Clause
Sub Clause
1 - NEWCA GAS HMA01 40 CFR 60 i
1 - NEWCA NO2 HMA01 6 NYCRR 201 5 1
1 - NEWCA NO2 HMA01 6 NYCRR 201 7 2
1 - NEWCA NO2 HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 10 a 2
1 - NEWCA NO2 HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 3 a
1 - NEWCA NO2 HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 6 a
1 - NEWCA NO2 HMA01 40 CFR 60 i
1 - NEWCA WOF HMA01 6 NYCRR 201 5 1
1 - NEWCA WOF HMA01 6 NYCRR 201 7 2
1 - NEWCA WOF HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 10 a 2
1 - NEWCA WOF HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 3 a
1 - NEWCA WOF HMA01 6 NYCRR 212 6 a
1 - NEWCA WOF HMA01 40 CFR 60 i
1 - NEWCA RAP 00CR1 6 NYCRR 200
1 - NEWCA RAP 00CR1 6 NYCRR 201
1 - NEWCA RAP 00CR1 6 NYCRR 212
1 - NEWCA RAP 00CR1 40 CFR 60 000
-
12/21/01 Page 10
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Emission Unit Compliance Certification (continuation)
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
6 NYCRR 201 6 1 a
X Applicable Federal Requirement - State Only Requirement X Capping
Emission Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
CAS No. Contaminant Name
1 - NEWCA 00001 GAS HMA01
- -
Monitoring Information
- Continuous Emission Monitoring
- Intermittent Emission Testing
- Ambient Air Monitoring
- Monitoring of Process or Control Device Parameters as Surrogate
- Work Practice Involving Specific Operations
X Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
Criteria pollutants will be capped at the facility level such that the total of all sources will be below Title V thresholds for
average. The limits on the asphalt plant will be on asphalt production.
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code Description Code Description Code Description
17 annual max rolled monthly 05 monthly 09 annually
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragrap
h
Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
6 NYCRR 201 6 1 a
- Applicable Federal Requirement - State Only Requirement - Capping
Emission Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
CAS No. Contaminant Name
1 - NEWCA 00001 NO2 HMA01
- -
Monitoring Information
- Continuous Emission Monitoring
- Intermittent Emission Testing
- Ambient Air Monitoring
- Monitoring of Process or Control Device Parameters as Surrogate
- Work Practice Involving Specific Operations
X Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
Criteria pollutants will be capped at the facility level such that the total of all sources will be below Title V
thresholds for any 12-month rolling average. The limits on the asphalt plant will be on asphalt production.
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit
Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code
Description Code Description Code Description
17 annual max rolled
monthly
05 monthly 09
annually
12/21/01 Page 11
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Emission Unit Compliance Certification (continuation)
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
6 NYCRR 201 6 1 a
X Applicable Federal Requirement - State Only Requirement X Capping
Emission Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
CAS No. Contaminant Name
1 - NEWCA 00001 WOF HMA01
- -
Monitoring Information
- Continuous Emission Monitoring
- Intermittent Emission Testing
- Ambient Air Monitoring
- Monitoring of Process or Control Device Parameters as Surrogate
- Work Practice Involving Specific Operations
X Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
Criteria pollutants will be capped at the facility level such that the total of all sources will be below Title V thresholds for
average. The limits on the asphalt plant will be on asphalt production.
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code Description Code Description Code Description
17 annual max rolled
monthly
05 monthly 09 annually
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragrap
h
Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
- Applicable Federal Requirement - State Only Requirement - Capping
Emission Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
CAS No. Contaminant Name
- -
Monitoring Information
- Continuous Emission Monitoring
- Intermittent Emission Testing
- Ambient Air Monitoring
- Monitoring of Process or Control Device Parameters as Surrogate
- Work Practice Involving Specific Operations
X Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit
Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code
Description Code Description Code Description
12/21/01 Page 12
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information (continued)
Emission Unit Compliance Certification (continuation)
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
40 CFR 60 000
X Applicable Federal Requirement - State Only Requirement X Capping
Emission Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
CAS No. Contaminant Name
1 - NEWCA RAP 00CR1 NY075 - 00 - 5 PM 10
Monitoring Information
- Continuous Emission Monitoring
X Intermittent Emission Testing
- Ambient Air Monitoring
- Monitoring of Process or Control Device Parameters as Surrogate
- Work Practice Involving Specific Operations
- Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
The fugitive emissions from the crusher shall not exceed 15 percent opacity based on a 6 minute average.
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
15 136 percent
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code Description Code Description Code Description
18 6 minute average 14 as required 10 upon request
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
X Applicable Federal Requirement - State Only Requirement - Capping
Emission Unit
Emission
Point
Process
Emission
Source
CAS No. Contaminant Name
Monitoring Information
- Continuous Emission Monitoring
X Intermittent Emission Testing
- Ambient Air Monitoring
- Monitoring of Process or Control Device Parameters as Surrogate
- Work Practice Involving Specific Operations
- Record Keeping/Maintenance Procedures
Description
Work Practice Process Material
Reference Test Method
Type Code Description
Parameter
Manufacturer Name/Model No.
Code Description
Limit
Limit Units
Upper Lower Code Description
Averaging Method Monitoring Frequency Reporting Requirements
Code
Description Code Description Code Description
12/21/01 Page 13
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information (continued)
Determination of Non-Applicability (Title V Only) - Continuation Sheet(s)
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub
Division
Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
Emission Unit Emission Point Process Emission Source
- Applicable Federal Requirement
- State Only Requirement
Description
Rule Citation
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub
Division
Paragraph Sub Paragraph Clause Sub Clause
Emission Unit Emission Point Process Emission Source
- Applicable Federal Requirement
- State Only Requirement
Description
Process Emissions Summary X Continuation Sheet(s)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
G A S
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY210 - 00 - 0 Oxides of Nitrogen 100 0 10.4 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
10.4 5,200 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
G A S
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY075 - 00 - 5 PM10 100 99.95 18,400 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
9.2 4,600 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
G A S
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
7446 - 09 - 5 Sulfur Dioxide 100 0 1.4 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
1.4 680 03
12/21/01 Page 14
NYS Air Permit Application
(supporting information)
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Process Emissions Summary (continuation)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
G A S
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
630 - 08 - 0 Carbon Monoxide 100 0 52.0 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
52.0 26,000 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
G A S
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY998 - 00 - 0 Volatile Organic Compounds 100 0 12.8 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
12.8 6,400 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
G A S
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY100 - 00 - 0 Total HAPs 100 0 1.7 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
1.7 834 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
N O 2
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY210 - 00 - 0 Oxides of Nitrogen 100 0 22.2 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
22.2 4,435 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
N O 2
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY075 - 00 - 5 PM10 100 99.95 18,400 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
9.2 1,318 03
12/21/01 Page 15
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Process Emissions Summary (continuation)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
N O 2
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
630 - 08 - 0 Carbon Monoxide 100 0 52.0 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
52.0 6,921 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
N O 2
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY998 - 00 - 0 Volatile Organic Compounds 100 0 12.8 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
12.8 1,629 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
N O 2
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
7446 - 09 - 5 Sulfur Dioxide 100 0 5.8 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
5.8 12,511 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
N O 2
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY100 - 00 - 0 Total Haps 100 0 3.0 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
3.0 374 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
W O F
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY210 - 00 - 0 Oxides of Nitrogen 100 0 22.0 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
22.0 5,500 03
12/21/01 Page 16
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Process Emissions Summary (continuation)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
W O F
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY075 - 00 - 5 PM10 100 99.5 18,400 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
9.2 2,300 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
W O F
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
630 - 08 - 0 Carbon Monoxide 100 0 52.0 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
52.0 13,000 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
W O F
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY998 - 00 - 0 Volatile Organic Compounds 100 0 12.8 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
12.8 3,200 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
W O F
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
7446 - 09 - 5 Sulfur Dioxide 100 0 23.2 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
23.2 5,800 03
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
W O F
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY100 - 00 - 0 Total Haps 100 0 3.0 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
3.0 758 03
EMISSION UNIT PROCESS
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
12/21/01 Page 17
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information
Process Emissions Summary (continuation)
EMISSION UNIT
1 - N E W C A
PROCESS
R A P
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
NY075 - 00 - 5 PM10 100 0 0.1 03
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
0.1 518 03
EMISSION UNIT PROCESS
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
EMISSION UNIT PROCESS
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
EMISSION UNIT PROCESS
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
EMISSION UNIT PROCESS
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
EMISSION UNIT PROCESS
CAS No. Contaminant Name
%
Thruput
%
Capture
%
Control
ERP
(lbs/hr)
ERP How
Determined
PTE
Standard
Units
PTE How
Determined
Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (standard units) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
12/21/01 Page 18
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information (continued)
EMISSION UNIT
Emission Unit Emissions Summary Continuation Sheet(s)
-
CAS No. Contaminant Name
- -
ERP (lbs/yr)
PTE Emissions Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
CAS No. Contaminant Name
- -
ERP (lbs/yr)
PTE Emissions Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
CAS No. Contaminant Name
- -
ERP (lbs/yr)
PTE Emissions Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
CAS No. Contaminant Name
- -
ERP (lbs/yr)
PTE Emissions Actual
(lbs/hr) (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/yr)
Compliance Plan Continuation Sheet(s)
For any emission units which are not in compliance at the time of permit application, the applicant shall complete the following
Consent Order Certified progress reports are to be submitted every 6 months beginning / /
Emission
Unit Process
Emis.
Source
Applicable Federal Requirement
Title Type Part Sub Part Section Sub Division Parag. Sub Parag. Clause Sub Clause
-
Remedial Measure / Intermediate Milestones R/I
Date
Scheduled
12/21/01 Page 19
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Section IV - Emission Unit Information (continued)
Request for Emission Reduction Credits Continuation Sheet(s)
EMISSION UNIT -
Emission Reduction Description
Contaminant Emission Reduction Data
Baseline Period / / to / /
Reduction
Date Method
/ /
CAS No. Contaminant Name
ERC (lbs/yr)
Netting Offset
- -
- -
- -
Facility to Use Future Reduction
Name APPLICATION ID
- - /
Location Address
City / Town / Village State Zip
Use of Emission Reduction Credits Continuation Sheet(s)
EMISSION UNIT -
Proposed Project Description
Contaminant Emissions Increase Data
CAS No. Contaminant Name PEP (lbs/yr)
- -
Statement of Compliance
All facilities under the ownership of this “ownership/firm” are operating in compliance with all applicable requirements and state regulations
including any compliance certification requirements under Section 114(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, or are meeting the
schedule of a consent order.
Source of Emission Reduction Credit - Facility
Name PERMIT ID
- - /
Location Address
City / Town / Village State Zip
Emission Unit CAS No. Contaminant Name
ERC (lbs/yr)
Netting Offset
- - -
- - -
- - -
12/21/01 Page 20
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
Supporting Documentation
X P.E. Certification (form attached)
List of Exempt Activities (form attached)
Plot Plan
X Calculations
Air Quality Model ( / / )
Confidentiality Justification
Ambient Air Monitoring Plan ( / / )
Stack Test Protocols/Reports ( / / )
Continuous Emissions Monitoring Plans/QA/QC ( / / )
MACT Demonstration ( / / )
Operational Flexibility: Description of Alternative Operating Scenarios and Protocols
Title IV: Application/Registration
ERC Quantification (form attached)
Use of ERC(s) (form attached)
Baseline Period Demonstration
Analysis of Contemporaneous Emission Increase/Decrease
LAER Demonstration ( / / )
BACT Demonstration ( / / )
Other Document(s): ( / / )
( / / )
( / / )
( / / )
( / / )
( / / )
( / / )
( / / )
12/21/01 Page 21
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Air Permit Application
DEC ID
P.E. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined, and am familiar with, the statements and information submitted in this
document and all its attachments as they pertain to the practice of engineering. This is defined as the performance of a professional
service such as consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning, design or supervision of construction or operation in connection with any
utilities, structures, buildings, machines, equipment, processes, works, or projects wherein the safeguarding of life, health and property
is concerned, when such service or work requires the application of engineering principals and data. Based on my inquiry of those
individuals with primary responsibility for obtaining such information, I certify that the statements and information are to the best of my
knowledge and belief true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false statements and
information or omitting required statements and information, including the possibility of fine or imprisonment.
Name of P.E.
Signature of P.E.
Date / /
NYS License No.
Phone ( )
12/21/01 Page 22
Calculation Sheets
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Air Emission Summary
Annual Emissions
Fuel Annual Hours Total
Plant Use Prod. of Oper. PM10 NOx VOC's SO2 CO Haps
Asphalt Drum Plant (gas fired) 62,000,000 200,000 500 4,600 5,200 6,400 680 26,000 834
Asphalt Drum Plant (oil fired) 75,000 50,000 125 1,150 2,750 1,600 550 6,500 374
A/C Heater (Exempt Process) 84,231 NA NA 168 1,685 29 11,961 421 NA
Asphalt Drum Plant (recycled oil fired) 200,000 100,000 250 2,300 5,500 3,200 5,800 13,000 758
Aggregate Plant - RAP Processing Plant NA 216,000 3,600 518 NA NA NA NA NA
TOTALS (in pounds) 8,737 15,135 11,229 18,991 45,921 1,966
TOTALS (in tons) 4.4 7.6 5.6 9.5 23.0 1.0
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Air Emission Summary
Annual Emissions
Asphalt Plant Gas Fired
Process - GAS
Fuel Annual Hours
Emission Source Use Prod. of Op. PM10 NOx VOC's SO2 CO HAPs
Asphalt Drum Plant (gas fired) 62,000,000 200,000 500 4,600 5,200 6,400 680 26,000 834
TOTALS (in pounds per year) 4,600 5,200 6,400 680 26,000 834
TOTALS (in tons per year) 2.3 2.6 3.2 0.3 13.0 0.4
TOTALS (in pounds per hour) 9.2 10.4 12.8 1.4 52.0 1.7
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Process - NO2
Fuel Annual Hours
Emission Source Use Prod. of Op. PM10 NOx VOC's SO2 CO HAPs
Asphalt Drum Plant (oil fired) 75,000 50,000 125 1,150 2,750 1,600 550 6,500 374
A/C Heater 84,231 NA 8,760 168 1,685 29 11,961 421 NA
TOTALS (in pounds per year) 1,318 4,435 1,629 12,511 6,921 374
TOTALS (in tons per year) 0.7 2.2 0.8 6.3 3.5 0.2
TOTALS (in pounds per hour) 9.2 22.2 12.8 5.8 52.0 3.0
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Air Emission Summary
Annual Emissions
Asphalt Plant Waste Oil Fired
Process - WOF
Fuel Annual Hours
Emission Source Use Prod. of Op. PM10 NOx VOC's SO2 CO HAPs
Asphalt Drum Plant (recycled oil fired) 200,000 100,000 250 2,300 5,500 3,200 5,800 13,000 758
TOTALS (in pounds per year) 2,300 5,500 3,200 5,800 13,000 758
TOTALS (in tons per year) 1.2 2.8 1.6 2.9 6.5 0.4
TOTALS (in pounds per hour) 9.2 22.0 12.8 23.2 52.0 3.0
Annual Emissions
Crushers
Process - DRY
Fuel Annual Hours
Emission Source Use Prod. of Op. PM10 NOx VOC's SO2 CO HAPs
Crushers NA 216,000 3,600 518 NA NA NA NA NA
TOTALS (in pounds) 518 NA NA NA NA NA
TOTALS (in tons) 0.3 NA NA NA NA NA
TOTALS (in pounds per hour) 0.1 NA NA NA NA NA
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Emission Calculations
Emission Inventory
Process WOF - Gencor Drum Plant
Plant Description Gencor Drum Plant Annual Production
Capacity 400 tph 100,000 tons
Annual Waste Oil Consumption
200,000 Gallons (Assumes 2.0 gallons per ton of HMA)
Sulfur Content
NA Percent
Natural Gas Consumption
NA Cubic Feet (Assumes 0.31MCF per ton of HMA)
Criteria Emission Calculations
Waste Oil-Fired Dryer from Drum HMA Plants
CAS# Name
AP-42 Emission Factors
1
Emissions
2
NY075-00-5 PM10 0.023 2,300
7446-09-5 Sulfur Dioxide 0.058 5,800
NY210-00-0 Oxides of Nitrogen 0.055 5,500
630-08-0 Carbon Monoxide 0.130 13,000
NY998-00-0 Volatile Organic Compounds 0.032 3,200
1
Emission Factors in Pounds Per Ton of Asphalt
2
Emissions in pounds per year. Calculation based on mulitplying the AP-42 emission factor
by the total permitted asphalt production for one year.
PM emissions are total filterable particulates.
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP'S) Emission Calculations
Emission Inventory
Process WOF - Gencor Drum Plant
Plant Description Gencor Drum Plant Annual Production
Capacity
400 tp
tph 100,000 tons
Annual Waste Oil Consumption
200,000 Gallons (Assumes 2.0 gallons per ton of HMA)
Sulfur Content
Natural Gas Consumption
NA Cubic Feet (Assumes 0.31MCF per ton of HMA)
Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP'S) Emission Calculations
Waste Oil-Fired Dryer from Drum HMA Plants
CASRN Name AP-42 Emission Factors Emissions
71-43-2 Benzene 3.9E-04
3.9E+01
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 2.4E-04
2.4E+01
50-00-0 Formaldehyde 3.1E-03 3.1E+02
91-20-3 Naphthalene 6.5E-04 6.5E+01
108-88-3 Toluene
2.9E-03 2.9E+02
1330-20-7 Xylene 2.0E-04
2.0E+01
Arsenic 5.6E-07
5.6E-02
Cadmium 4.1E-07
4.1E-02
Chromium 5.5E-06
5.5E-01
Lead 1.5E-05 1.5E+00
Manganese 7.7E-06
7.7E-01
Mercury 2.6E-06 2.6E-01
Nickel 6.3E-05 6.3E+00
Selenium 3.5E-07
3.5E-02
Total HAP's (Pounds per year) 758
Total HAP's (Tons per year) 0.38
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Emission Calculations
Emission Inventory
Process GAS - Gencor Drum Plant
Plant Description Gencor Drum Plant Annual Production
Capacity 400 tph 200,000 tons
Annual Fuel Oil Consumption
NA Gallons (Assumes 1.5 gallons per ton of HMA)
Sulfur Content
NA Percent
Natural Gas Consumption
62,000,000 Cubic Feet (Assumes 0.31MCF per ton of HMA)
Criteria Emission Calculations
Gas-Fired Dryer from Batch HMA Plants
CAS# Name
AP-42 Emission Factors
1
Emissions
2
NY075-00-5 PM10
0.023 4,600
7446-09-5 Sulfur Dioxide
0.0034 680
NY210-00-0 Oxides of Nitrogen
0.026 5,200
630-08-0 Carbon Monoxide
0.13 26,000
NY998-00-0 Volatile Organic Compounds
0.032 6,400
1
Emission Factors in Pounds Per Ton of Asphalt
2
Emissions in pounds per year. Calculation based on mulitplying the AP-42 emission factor
by the total permitted asphalt production for one year.
TOC's are total organic compounds measured as methane based upon EPA Method 25A.
PM emissions are total filterable particulates.
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Emission Calculations
Emission Inventory
Process GAS - Gencor Drum Plant
Plant Description Gencor Drum Plant Annual Production
Capacity 400 tph 200,000 tons
Annual Fuel Oil Consumption
NA Gallons (Assumes 1.5 gallons per ton of HMA)
Sulfur Content
NA Percent
Natural Gas Consumption
62,000,000 Cubic Feet (Assumes 0.31MCF per ton of HMA)
Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP'S) Emission Calculations
Gas-Fired Dryer from Drum HMA Plants
CASRN Name
AP-42 Emission Factors
1
Emissions
2
71-43-2 Benzene 0.00039 78.00
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.00024 48.00
50-00-0 Formaldehyde 0.0031 620.00
91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.00009 18.00
108-88-3 Toluene 0.00015 30.00
1330-20-7 Xylene 0.0002 40.00
Total HAP's (Pounds per year) 834
Total HAP's (Tons per year) 0.42
1
Emision factors in pounds per ton of asphalt
2
Emissions in pounds per year. Calculation based on multiplying the AP-42 emission factor
by the total permitted asphalt production for one year.
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Emission Calculations
Emission Inventory
Process NO2 - Gencor Drum Plant
Plant Description Gencor Drum Plant Annual Production
Capacity 400 tph 50,000 tons
Annual Fuel Oil Consumption
75,000 Gallons (Assumes 1.5 gallons per ton of HMA)
Sulfur Content
NA Percent
Natural Gas Consumption
NA Cubic Feet (Assumes 0.31MCF per ton of HMA)
Criteria Emission Calculations
Oil-Fired Dryer from Drum HMA Plants
CAS# Name
AP-42 Emission Factors
1
Emissions
2
NY075-00-5 PM10
0.023 1,150
7446-09-5 Sulfur Dioxide
0.011 550
NY210-00-0 Oxides of Nitrogen
0.055 2,750
630-08-0 Carbon Monoxide
0.130 6,500
NY998-00-0 Volatile Organic Compounds
0.032 1,600
1
Emission Factors in Pounds Per Ton of Asphalt
2
Emissions in pounds per year. Calculation based on mulitplying the AP-42 emission factor
by the total permitted asphalt production for one year.
TOC's are total organic compounds measured as methane based upon EPA Method 25A.
PM emissions are total filterable particulates.
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP'S) Emission Calculations
Emission Inventory
Process NO2 - Gencor Drum Plant
Plant Description Gencor Drum Plant Annual Production
Capacity 400 tph 50,000 tons
Annual Fuel Oil Consumption
75,000 Gallons (Assumes 1.5 gallons per ton of HMA)
Sulfur Content
NA Percent
Natural Gas Consumption
NA Cubic Feet (Assumes 0.31MCF per ton of HMA)
Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP'S) Emission Calculations
Oil-Fired Dryer from Drum HMA Plants
CASRN Name AP-42 Emission Factors Emissions
71-43-2 Benzene 0.00039 20
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.00024 12
50-00-0 Formaldehyde 0.0031 155
91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.00065 33
108-88-3 Toluene 0.0029 145
1330-20-7 Xylene 0.0002 10
Total HAP's (Pounds per year) 374
Total HAP's (Tons per year) 0.19
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Hot Oil Heater Emission Calculations
Emission Inventory
Burner Make:
Burner Model:
Burner Output (MM BTU/hr): 1.25
Maximum Fuel Usage (Gallons per hour): 9.6
Number of Hot Oil Heaters: 1
Operating Parameters:
Minutes per Hour (Maximum potential):
Hours per day:
Days per Year:
Annual Hours:
Estimated Annual Residual Fuel Use (Gallons): NA
Estimated Annual Distillate Fuel Use (Gallons): 8760 hrs 84,231
Sulfur Content(%S):
Estimated Annual Natural Gas Use (Cu. Ft.):
Proposed Capping Limits
PM NOx VOC SO2 CO
Distillate Oil Factors 2.00 20.00 0.34 142.00 5.00
(lbs/1,000 gals)
Annual Emissions 168 1685 29 11961 421
(in pounds per year)
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT LLC
Rensselaer Facility
Process RAP - RAP Processing Plant
Rated Ave Hours Days Em Factor
Source # Equipment Type TPH TPH Per Day Per Yr TPA PM10* PM10 PM10
(lb/ton) (lbs) (tons)
00CR1 Secondary Crusher - H. Mill 60 60 12 300 216,000 0.0024 518 0.3
Totals 518 0.3
a
AP-42 emissions factors from Table 11.19.2.2-1 in AP-42 11.19.2 Crushed Stone Processing
Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
8 Brunswick Road Troy, New York 12180
Phone: (518) 270-5920 Fax: (518) 270-5922
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT, LLC
Rensselaer (Riverside Avenue) Plant
Port of Rensselaer, City of Rensselaer, Rensselaer County, New
York
STOCKPILE MAINTENANCE PLAN
FOR
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Prepared by: Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
Date: February 15, 2011
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Stockpile Maintenance Plan 2/15/11
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Stockpile Maintenance Plan is submitted to comply with 6 NYCRR §212.12. The plan
details methods to be employed by New Castle Asphalt, LLC to control and/or reduce moisture
content in its aggregate stockpiles at the proposed Rensselaer Plant.
2.0 LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION
The Rensselaer Plant is located on the west side of Riverside Avenue in the City of Rensselaer,
Rensselaer County, New York. A 400 ton per hour drum mix plant is proposed to be built at this
location during 2011.
3.0 METHODS TO CONTROL MOISTURE CONTENT
The following methods will be used to control moisture content in the stockpiles:
The perimeter of the Stockpile Area will be bermed to prevent external stormwater
from entering the Stockpile Area
Vehicle access points to the Stockpile Area will have rollover curbs that prevent
external stormwater from entering the area.
The Stockpile Area will be graded to the northeast to direct water away from the
stockpiles and towards a stormwater basin well removed from the stockpiles.
Loader operators will be trained to preferentially avoid wetter portions of the pile
whenever feasible.
The stockpiles will be located in an area subject to direct sunlight throughout the day.
Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
8 Brunswick Road Troy, New York 12180
Phone: (518) 270-5920 Fax: (518) 270-5922
NEW CASTLE ASPHALT, LLC
Rensselaer Plant
Port of Rensselaer, City of Rensselaer, Rensselaer County, New York
FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN
FOR
N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Facility Contact: Roderick J. Valente, Managing Member
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
Riverside Avenue
Rensselaer, New York 12144
Company Contact: Roderick J. Valente, Managing Member
New Castle Asphalt, LLC
118 Button Road
Waterford, New York 12188
(518) 432-4470
Prepared by: Paul H. Griggs, Principal Geologist
Griggs-Lang Consulting Geologists, Inc.
Date: May 31, 2011
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Fugitive Dust Control Plan 5/31/11
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following report outlines the procedures that will be taken to control fugitive dust at the
proposed New Castle Asphalt Rensselaer Plant in the Port of Rensselaer, City of Rensselaer,
Rensselaer County.
The site is located on the west and north sides of Riverside Avenue and northwest of the Port
Expressway in the center of the Port of Rensselaer.
A copy of this Fugitive Dust Control Plan will be kept on-site.
2.0 POTENTIAL DUST SOURCES
The following potential sources of fugitive dust will exist at the proposed Rensselaer Plant:
Heavy equipment operation, primarily in the Stockpile Area
Trucks on the entrance/perimeter access road
Plant operations
Load out and wind erosion from stockpiles
3.0 METHODS FOR CONTROLLING FUGITIVE DUST
The proposed Rensselaer Plant will use the following best management practices to control dust.
These methods are in addition to those implemented in the blacktop plant (such as the baghouse):
Wooded perimeter buffer zones not needed for the safe and efficient operation of the site
will be maintained. Approximately 53 percent of the site will be green space.
The vegetated perimeter berms will reduce incident wind speeds, thereby reducing the
potential for wind erosion.
Areas not needed for the safe and efficient operation of the site will be vegetated.
The largest potential sources of dust are located as far from the property line as possible
and as far from Riverside Avenue and the Port Expressway as possible.
Stockpile heights will be kept low to reduce the opportunity for wind erosion.
The aggregates have a natural moisture content that helps bind finer grained particles
together and minimize the generation of dust.
Stockpiled RAP will be bound together by asphalt and will be an insignificant source of
dust.
The active excavated faces of the stockpiles that are more susceptible to wind erosion
will be oriented towards the center of the site.
Spilled material will be periodically cleaned up in the Plant Area by a skid steer,
reincorporated into salable products or stored in areas not subject to erosion.
Baghouse fines will be reincorporated into salable products or emptied into trucks on an
infrequent basis and stored in areas not subject to erosion.
A speed limit of 15 mph will be posted on the site to control the amount of dust generated
on the entrance/perimeter access road.
The entrance/perimeter access road will be paved and swept as needed to control the
build up of sediment and the generation of dust.
Truck racks will be used to allow truckers to trim and cover their loads prior to leaving
the site.
Spillage will be cleaned up as needed to control generation of excessive amounts of dust
and to keep the site clean. The frequency of cleaning up spilled material will vary
depending on how much material is running through the plant and how much product is
being produced during a given day.
New Castle Asphalt, LLC Rensselaer Plant Fugitive Dust Control Plan 5/31/11
2
In accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 201-1.8, no person shall unnecessarily remove, handle, or
cause to be handled, collected air contaminants from an air cleaning device for recycling, salvage,
or disposal in a manner that would reintroduce them to the outdoor atmosphere.