PEER EVALUATION OF LECTURER RANK FACULTY
Form LP
Name
Department/Unit
Date
Date
Employed
The departmental/unit chairperson must assess whether or not lecturer rank faculty are performing in a
satisfactory way, and convey that information to the faculty member, along with suggestions for
improvement. In keeping with University policy that recommendations for improvement devolve from the
professional judgment of instructor and professorial rank peers, you are required to participate in the
decision making process by completing the following evaluation, including the sections calling for
comments. Only the departmental/unit chairperson will see these individual evaluation forms, but
comments will be summarized and shared with the candidate. Please check the appropriate descriptor for
each area of emphasis, making additional comments as appropriate.
CONTRIBUTION TO UNIVERSITY MISSION
Degree of Emphasis*
Teaching: □OUTSTANDING □HIGH □GOOD □ACCEPTABLE □UNACCEPTABLE
*( )
Comments:
Research/Scholarship/Creative
Activity: □OUTSTANDING □HIGH □GOOD □ACCEPTABLE
*( ) □ UNACCEPTABLE
Comments:
Comments:
Based on the above evaluation, indicate your assessment by selecting one of the following options:
a)
______
Satisfactory progress,
or
b)
Unsatisfactory progress/Probation
or
If this is the 2
nd
year of a 3-year contract, or a probationary year, choose the appropriate option:
a)
______
Renew 3-year contract,
or
b)
Do not renew 3-year contract
If this is also a promotion consideration, choose the appropriate option:
a)
______
Grant promotion,
or
b)
Do not grant promotion
*Supplied by the departmental/unit chairperson from the Agreement on Responsibilities for the current
year.
