Lead agencies may include 15 hardcopies of this document when submitting electronic copies of Environmental Impact
Reports, Negative Declarations, Mitigated Negative Declarations, or Notices of Preparation to the State Clearinghouse
(SCH). The SCH also accepts other summaries, such as EIR Executive Summaries prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15123. Please include one copy of the Notice of Completion Form (NOC) with your submission and attach the
summary to each electronic copy of the document.
SCH #:
Project Title:
Lead Agency:
Contact Name:
Email:
Project Location:
Project Decription (Proposed actions, location, and/or consequences).
Revised September 2011
Summary Form for Electronic Document Submittal
City County
Form F
Identify the project's signicant or potentially signicant effects and briey describe any proposed mitigation measures that
would reduce or avoid that effect.
Phone Number:
Irwindale Materials Recovery Facility and Transfer Station (“MRF/TS”) Project
2200 Arrow Highway, Irwindale, CA 91706 County of Los Angeles
The proposed Irwindale Materials Recovery Facility and Transfer Station (“MRF/TS”) Project includes development of a
municipal solid waste collection facility, in which materials are sorted for recovery of recyclable and compostable
materials, and then transported to either shipping facilities (for recyclables), composting facilities, and landfills (for
residual wastes). The MRF/TS includes associated administrative offices, and a convenience store/public gas station
within the City of Irwindale.
The 2020 Recirculated Draft EIR addresses four specific environmental topics as directed by a September 2019
Superior Court of California Decision and Writ of Mandate, including: 1) Truck Fueling Operations; 2) Greenhouse Gas
Emissions; 3) Transportation Energy Impacts, and 4) Project-Specific Health Risks.
Specific to the 2020 RDEIR:
The 2020 Recirculated DEIR addresses four (4) specific environmental topics as directed by a September 2019 Superior
Court of California Decision and Writ of Mandate, including: 1) Truck Fueling Operations; 2) Greenhouse Gas Emissions;
3) Transportation Energy Use; and 4) Project-Specific Air Emissions Health Risks. The analyses conclude that truck
fueling operations, greenhouse gas emissions and transportation energy will have less-than-significant environmental
effects. The analysis of project-specific air emissions concludes that it is scientifically infeasible to substantively connect
an individual project’s regional air quality impacts from criteria air pollutants to likely health consequences.
