To the PARTICIPANT
This leadership feedback tool is unlike the CAPF 50’s you are used to at your
home squadron in that it is a “360
o
” assessment of your leadership skill. Subordi-
nates, peers, and superiors (not just your immediate boss) will reflect on your
performance as a leader and anonymously use this form to communicate with
you. Someone who is senior to you but not your immediate boss will serve as your
coach and help you interpret the feedback you receive. Your challenge as the par-
ticipant is (1) to try to be open and receptive toward feedback and (2) to decide
on your own what steps you need to take to further your personal development
as a leader.
To the EVALUATOR
You are a subordinate, peer, or are superior to the participant named above and
you are being asked to evaluate that individual’s leadership performance. As with
any feedback tool, this exercise will be helpful to the participant only if you are
positive, constructive, and specific. Use the space designated for each evaluated
category to cite real examples to support your judgments. Don’t be vague or
speak in platitudes. Thank you for your efforts to help a colleague further his or
her own leadership journey. SEE REVERSE FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS.
CAP ENCAMPMENT PROGRAM
360
o
Leadership Feedback for Cadre
PARTICIPATING CADET’s NAME: PARTICIPATING CADET’s GRADE:
ENCAMPMENT NAME: PARTICIPATING CADET’s
(Year, Host Region or Wing, Site) DUTY ASSIGNMENT:
OUTSTANDING
3 points each
VERY GOOD
2 points each
SUCCESSFUL
1 point each
CADET CADRE MEMBER
COACH / ADVISOR for this 360
o
FEEDBACK
{ NOT the EVALUATOR }
TOTAL POINTS:
Goal is 8 or more
CAPF 60-96 Feb 18
Personal Integrity
honest, good role model of the Core Values
does not show favoritism
humble, does not display cockiness
pushes-back against bad attitudes immoral conduct
Mission Effectiveness
expresses a clear and appropriate vision for the team
teaches and develops people
fully knowledgeable about all aspects of job and subject matter
gets job done, thorough, on time, dependable
Safety Focus
knows location of subordinates at all times
safety-conscious attitude is visible in encampment daily life
pro-actively take steps to keep people safe
People Skills
is fair in dealings with others and does not display favoritism
takes a positive approach to leadership; does not “boss” or threaten
motivates the team and each individual to support one another and try hard
makes an effort to use empathy
disciplines others fairly and constructively
Communication Skills
keeps the boss informed when appropriate
asks questions
listens carefully to subordinates and superiors alike
speaks clearly and concisely
good public speaking fundamentals when in front of the team
Delegation Skills
gives clear directions to subordinates
encourages subordinates to ask questions, apply their creativity
leads by using a “command intent”
monitors subordinates’ progress and redirects as needed
does not over-delegate; retains assignments that are beyond the subordinate’s scope and ability
NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT
0 points each
UNACCEPTABLE
-2 points each
Additional Comments, Observed Successes, and Suggestions for Future Growth: (continue on reverse if necessary)
C/Col
18
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS
Particpating cadets are evaluated by subordinates, peers, and superiors. The table below lists suggested evaluators
for participating cadets based on each participant’s duty assignment.
PARTICIPANT SUGGESTED EVALUATORS
Cadet Flight Sergeant Cadet Flight Commander Cadet First Sergeant Training Officer
Immediate Superior Superior Senior / Superior
Cadet Flight Commander Cadet Flight Sergeant Cadet Flight Commander Cadet Squadron Commander Training Officer
Immediate Subordinate Peer Immediate Superior Senior / Superior
Cadet First Sergeant Cadet Flight Sergeant Cadet Flight Commander Cadet Squadron Commander Training Officer(s)
Indirect Subordinate Superior Immediate Superior Senior / Superior(s)
Cadet Squadron Commander Cadet Flight Commander(s) Cadet Commander or Deputy Training Officer Commandant of Cadets
Immediate Subordinate(s) Immediate Superior Senior / Superior Senior / Superior
Cadet Support Staff Peer on Cadet Support Staff Cadet Executive Officer Senior Support Staff Member
Peer Immediate Superior Senior / Superior
Cadet Executive Officer Cadet Squadron Commander Cadet Commander Deputy Commander for Support Commandant of Cadets
Indirect Subordinate Immediate Superior Senior / Superior Senior / Superior
Cadet Deputy Commander Cadet Squadron Commander(s) Cadet Executive Officer Cadet Commander Commandant of Cadets
Subordinate(s) Peer Immediate Superior Senior / Superior
Cadet Commander Squadron Commander(s) Cadet Deputy or Exec. Off. Commandant of Cadets Encampment Commander
Subordinate Subordinate / Peer Senior / Immediate Superior Senior / Superior
Outstanding
Cadet displayed the traits
consistently throughout
most of the encampment,
with very few exceptions
Cadet’s mastery of this area
makes him or her an excel-
lent role model
Cadet is definitely ready for
advanced study in this area
and for complex new chal-
lenges
Very Good
Cadet displayed most traits
fairly consistently by the
encampment’s conclusion
Cadet is proficient in these
areas and is ready for new
challenges
With a little work, cadet can
develop this trait into a real
strength
Needs Improvement
Cadet seldom displayed
traits in this area before the
encampment’s conclusion
Cadet should work hard to
improve in these areas with
help of his or her home unit
GUIDE TO RATINGS
Successful
Cadet displayed most traits
fairly consistently by the
encampment’s conclusion
Cadet is generally proficient
in these areas and is becom-
ing readyfor new challenges
Unacceptable
Cadet frequently displayed
the antithesis of these traits.
Cadet required close super-
vision in this area.
Cadet’s attitude in this area
made it difficult for his or
her mentors to assist.