Fillable Faculty-evaluation AAMU Faculty Evaluation Form

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank Faculty-evaluation AAMU Faculty Evaluation Form Form

Use Fill to complete blank online ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

Faculty-evaluation AAMU Faculty Evaluation Form

On average this form takes 61 minutes to complete

The Faculty-evaluation AAMU Faculty Evaluation Form form is 7 pages long and contains:

  • 4 signatures
  • 0 check-boxes
  • 228 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

U.S.A. forms for Alabama A&M University

BROWSE ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
Tenure Status:
Tenured
Teaching
Research Service Other
Length of Time Teaching/Research in Discipline at AAMU:
Page 1
OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS
FACULTY EVALUATION FORM
Middle
Non-Tenured
First
Length of Time at University:
Dates Covered by this Evaluation:
Last
Primary Evaluator and Position Title:
Faculty Member Load Assignment (Percent for each category)
The rating scale is:
5 - Exceptional: Performance which is consistently carried out in an exceptional manner.
"Exceptional" ratings must be accompanied by a written justification from the supervisor
which clearly shows extraordinary accomplishment.
is expected for "Good."
3 - Good: Performance which is usually carried out well. This level of performance exceeds
expectations for "Acceptable" performance.
2 - Acceptable: Performance in which the faculty member competently fulfills the general
expectations for the position. Performance above this level should result in an
"Above Average" rating.
1 - Needs Improvement: Performance fails to meet the "Acceptable" standard, with identifiable
weakness. Performance at this absolute minimal level will require the faculty member and
supervisor to develop and complete a Plan of Work which will raise performance to
"Acceptable" by the next rating period. "Needs Improvement" ratings must be accompanied
by a written explanation.
0 - Not Acceptable: A "Not Acceptable" rating will be noted on the faculty member's record and
requires remedial action. It may be the basis for disciplinary action up to and including
dismissal. "Not Acceptable" ratings must be accompanied by a written explanation from
the supervisor.
X - Not Applicable: Place an "X" in the N/A column.
Page 2
4 - Excellent: Performance is frequently carried out in an extraordinary manner above what
Instructions: This instrument is to be used for evaluation of faculty members.
1
Rating N/A
1.1 (0-5) (X)
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Sum of Input
_________ - _______
Page 3
=
Comments (required for "Exceptional" (5), "Needs Improvement"(1), and "Not Acceptable" (0) ratings):
B. Accomodates various levels of development
Teaching Performance:
Presentations
A. Maintains office hours
Course design
A. Sets appropriate course objecties and outcomes
B. Uses effective teaching methods
C. Develops new courses
Assessment measures
A. Evaluates fairly with clear rubrics
B. Uses teaching/assessment instruments which are relevant to the
goals and expected outcomes of course
C. Returns students' work promptly
D. Keeps students abreast of progress in class
D. Requires students to conduct research
E. Covers appropriate subject matter
F. Requires students to complete reading/writing assignment
Course management
C. Arouses enthusiasm
D. Explains concepts skillfully
E. Encourages class participation
F. Is prepared for the class
G. Is punctual for class
=
TEACHING RATING =
B. Efforts in placement
C. Effective academic consultation
D. Maintains an inviting and comfortable environment
Other
A. Participates in structured learning that strengthens teaching skills
A. Encourages independent thinking, problem solving, critical thinking
A. Syllabi are available to student on the first day of the course
B. Syllabus follows university format
C. Maintains proper records of students' performance
D. Ethical behavior in teaching
Availability to students
H. Use of technology in instruction
I. Communicates clearly
J. Attends class sessions
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
29
0
29
2 Scholarly Activity and Research:
Rating N/A
2.1
(0 - 5) (X)
2.2
2.3
Sum of Input
__________
- ________
Comments (required for "Exceptional" (5), "Needs Improvement"(1), and "Not Acceptable" (0) ratings):
Page 4
=
=
B. Secure non-competitive grants
C. Secure competitive grants
D. Manages funded research in a timely manner
E. Manages research budgets effectively
F. Obtain significant results from activities
G. Submit reports timely
Professional organization activity and service
A. Serves on review committees for conference proceedings and
presentations
B. Serves on review committees for competitive grants and proposals
C. Serves on review committees/panels of creative work for
performances
D. Received awards or honors from professional organizations for
research/scholarly activities
E. Membership in professional societies
F. Serves on editorial board for scholarly journals
G. Chairs panels for session at professional meeting
H. Serves as responder for panel or session at professional meetings
J. Other scholarly activity (explain below)
I. Reviews scholarly work (articles, book reviews, etc.)
K. Ethical behavior in research and scholarly activities
SCHOLARLY ACTIVITY RATING =
A. Presents lectures, workshops, seminars, creative works
B. Makes presentations at professional meetings
C. Has non-refereed publications or creative works
D. Has refereed publications or creative works
E. Has published books or book chapters
Funded research/scholarly activity
A. Participates in proposal writing
Scholarship and research
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
23
0
23
3 Service:
Rating N/A
3.1
(0 - 5) (X)
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Sum of Input
__________
- ________
Page 5
C. Participates actively in state, regional or national professional
organizations
B. Sponsors or advises student organizations
Student activities
A. Advises students toward their academic progress
C. Acts as mentor or counselor to students
D. Works with students outside of classes
E. Serves on graduate supervisory committees
College/ University
Department
A. Participates in activities and committees
B. Acts as a leader in the departmental technology
B. Effectively completes assignments
C. Acts as a leader in school activities
D. Participates in voluntary university activities
E. Serves on university committees
F. Complies with university regulations
G. Acts as a leader in university activities
Community
A. Participates in professionally-related community activities
B. Submits reports as aggreed upon
=
C. Complies with departmental requirements
D. Effectively completes assigned services
A. Participates in activities and committees
C. Educational programs for non AAMU students
Other professional activities
SERVICE RATING =
=
A. Participates actively in local professional organizations
B. Attends in state, regional or national professional organizations
Comments (required for "Exceptional" (5), "Needs Improvement"(1), and "Not Acceptable" (0) ratings):
E. Acts as a leader in department activities
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
23
0
23
Column 1 Column 2
(from end of Section 1)
(from end of Section 2)
(from end of Section 3)
Total Total
Overall Performance Rating
Exceptional
5.00
Excellent 4.00-4.99
Good 3.00-3.99
Acceptable 2.00-2.99
Needs Improvement 1.00-1.99
Not Acceptable 0.00-0.99
Other Evaluations
A. PEERS
B. STUDENTS
Signature of
Evaluator: Date:
Conference and Comments:
Signature of
Faculty Member: Date:
Page 6
Response:
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Instructions: Each faculty member will be rated in the three areas of teaching, scholarly activity and research, and service,
according to a percentage related to load assignment as documented on the faculty activity/load forms each semester and
averaged for the two or three semesters of assignment. Since service is expected of all faculty, at least 10% of the faculty
member's performance score should be based on service. The remaining percentage should be allocated between scholarship
and teaching, based on the faculty member's load assignment. Since scholarly activity is a requirement of all faculty, at least
10% must be based on scholarly activity and research. The total must add up to 100%.
For example, if a faculty member is assigned 1/2 time to research and 1/2 time to teaching, the percentage weighting could
be: teaching 40%, scholarly activity 40%, and service 20%.
% Weighting
Related to
Teaching
Scholarly Activity (at least 10%)
Service (at least 10%)
Assignment Score
% Weighting
Col 1 x Col 2
x Score
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0.000
0.00
click to sign
signature
click to edit
click to sign
signature
click to edit
Date:
Your signature does not necessarily indicate that you are in agreement with the
evaluation. Your signature only indicates that you have had the opportunity to review the
evaluation and that you have discussed the content with your supervisor. Your failure to sign
does not negate this as an evaluation of record.
Date:
Comments:
Page 7
Signature of Faculty Member:
Supervisors' / Chairs' Signature:
Faculty Member's Comments:
click to sign
signature
click to edit
click to sign
signature
click to edit
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

Faculty-evaluation AAMU Faculty Evaluation Form

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 3 November 2019

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document