1
Approved - SPH Executive Council Meeting 10.4.2018
Evaluation of Adjunct Instructor Teaching Performance
Instructor Name:
Course Number:
Term:
Year:
This form is used by SPH department chairs to evaluate graduate teaching performance
of adjunct instructors. Please complete the first page of this form and return it to your
department chair, including supporting documents, no later than 30 days after the end
of the semester term. The SPH uses three basic concepts to evaluate teaching quality.
1. Course Delivery (Use of strategies that facilitate learning and application)
a. Quality course delivery - use results from peer review of teaching to provide evidence
b. Engaging, varied assignments - provide examples
c. Frequent and high-quality feedback given to students - provide examples
2. Course Rigor (Procedures appropriate for graduate level study)
a. Use results from peer review of teaching to provide evidence of rigor
b. High quality, challenging assignments - provide examples
c. Sufficient grade spread - provide distribution of final letter grades
3. Course Tone (Enthusiastic, respectful, responsive approach)
a. Student course evaluations - use comments
b.
Accurate, timely responses to students and administration - provide examples
such as email communications
Briefly describe how you have addressed these areas in your course(s) this semester (make
reference to evidence - provide file names in each of the three boxes below):
1. Course Delivery
2. Course Rigor
3. Course Tone
What did you learn this semester that you will incorporate the next time you offer the course?
Thank you for serving as an adjunct instructor for the SPH!
2
Approved - SPH Executive Council Meeting 10.4.2018
Chair Evaluation of Adjunct Teaching Quality
1. Course Delivery (Use of strategies that facilitate learning and application)
Exceeds Meets Does not Meet
2. Course Rigor (Procedures appropriate for graduate level study)
Exceeds Meets Does not Meet
3. Course Tone (Enthusiastic, respectful, responsive approach)
Exceeds Meets Does not Meet
4. Administrative Performance (compliant with UNTHSC policies)
Yes
No
Overall evaluation of instructor
Exceeds Meets Does not Meet
Summary Comments:
Instructor (Type Name)
Date
Chair (Type Name)
Date
Dea
n (Type Name)
Date