EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
FOR RENEWAL AND PROMOTION FOR COACHES Page 1 of 4
FS.17.18.005B, Revision of September 2017
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
FOR RENEWAL AND PROMOTION FOR COACHES
For each category of evaluation and recommendation, one (1) original signed by the DEC and member evaluated
and two (2) copies of the signed original.
I. DATA:
Name Date Date
Department
2nd Semester Evaluation: Years of Appropriate Professional Level Experience at CCSU
Years of Other Appropriate Professional Level Experience
Promotion: Years of Appropriate Professional Level Experience at CCSU
Years of Other Appropriate Professional Level Experience
Renewals: Years of Appropriate Professional Level Experience at CCSU
Years of Other Appropriate Professional Level Experience
Present Rank Years at Present Rank
Requested Rank
Type of recommendation: Renewal Type of Evaluation: 2
nd
Semester Evaluation
Promotion Final Year of Appointment
Eligibility for Promotion: Appropriate degree and specified years of appropriate professional level experience
Substantially comparable credentials and/or experience (Article 6.3)
II. EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS (Article 6.3 and 6.8 )
MINIMUM STANDARDS (Article 6.3)
Minimum standards of appointment or promotion to each rank shall be:
I – Earned master’s degree for athletic trainer, master’s degree preferred for coaches, and two years of
appropriate professional level experience.
II – Earned master’s degree for athletic trainer, master’s degree preferred for coaches, and three years
experience.
III – Earned master’s degree for athletic trainer, master’s degree preferred for coaches, and five years
experience.
IV – Earned master’s degree for athletic trainer, master’s degree preferred for coaches, and eight years
experience.
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
FOR RENEWAL AND PROMOTION FOR COACHES Page 2 of 4
A candidate who does not meet the above standards may also be appointed or promoted to a rank listed
above, provided the candidate has credentials and/or experience substantially comparable to the listed
standards.
CRITERION AND CATEGORIES (Article 6.8)
The criterion for evaluating coaches shall be the quality of service within the following categories,
weighted in the order listed:
6.8.1 Administration and conduct of the assigned sport (e.g., adherence to institutional policies and
applicable external rules governing the sport, fund raising, budget management, general program
organization and administration).
6.8.2 Relationship with student athletes (e.g., recruitment of qualified student athletes, maintenance of
acceptable graduation rates as established by the institution and team management).
6.8.3 Record of student athletes in competitive performance (e.g., program development, record of
successful competitions).
6.8.4 Productive service to the department and University.
6.8.5 Years in rank.
6.8.6 Record of any disciplinary action in the member’s personnel file at the time of the evaluation.
III. EVALUATION NARRATIVE: COMPLETE FOR ALL EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. In
the Evaluation Narrative, address each of the categories listed in Section II of this form.
See attached.
IV. RECOMMENDATION (For Renewal, and/or Promotion)
Departmental Evaluation Committee: (Please type names and
sign at right)
Date
Coach Acknowledges Receipt of this Evaluation:
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
FOR RENEWAL AND PROMOTION FOR COACHES Page 3 of 4
Within five (5) working days, Coach evaluated may append comments which will be attached to this report.
Reviewed by ______________________________________________ ___________________
(Athletic Director)
Reviewed by ______________________________________________ ___________________
(President)
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
FOR RENEWAL AND PROMOTION FOR COACHES Page 4 of 4
NAME:
INVENTORY OF DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED FOR:
No
Description of Item
Source
Date Entered In File