edTPA_MC_HSS_V06.1
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies
Assessment Handbook
Version 06.1
edTPA stems from a twenty-five-year history of developing performance-based assessments of
teaching quality and effectiveness. The Teacher Performance Assessment Consortium (Stanford
and AACTE) acknowledges the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, the
Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium, and the Performance Assessment for
California Teachers for their pioneering work using discipline-specific portfolio assessments to
evaluate teaching quality. This version of the handbook has been developed with thoughtful input
from over six hundred teachers and teacher educators representing various national design
teams, national subject matter organizations (ACEI, ACTFL, AMLE, CEC, IRA, NAEYC, NAGC,
NCSS, NCTE, NCTM, NSTA, SHAPE America), and content validation reviewers. All
contributions are recognized and appreciated.
This document was authored by the Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity (SCALE)
with editorial and design assistance from Evaluation Systems.
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved.
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted only pursuant to the terms of a written license agreement.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
i
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Contents
Introduction to edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies .................................................. 1
Purpose................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Overview of the Assessment ................................................................................................................................... 1
Structure of the Handbook ...................................................................................................................................... 4
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Tasks Overview .......................................................................... 6
Planning Task 1: Planning for Instruction and Assessment .......................................................... 9
What Do I Need to Think About? ............................................................................................................................ 9
What Do I Need to Do? ........................................................................................................................................... 9
What Do I Need to Write? ..................................................................................................................................... 11
How Will the Evidence of My Teaching Practice Be Assessed? ........................................................................... 14
Planning Rubrics ................................................................................................................................................... 15
Instruction Task 2: Instructing and Engaging Students in Learning ........................................... 20
What Do I Need to Think About? .......................................................................................................................... 20
What Do I Need to Do? ......................................................................................................................................... 20
What Do I Need to Write? ..................................................................................................................................... 22
How Will the Evidence of My Teaching Practice Be Assessed? ........................................................................... 23
Instruction Rubrics ................................................................................................................................................ 24
Assessment Task 3: Assessing Student Learning ........................................................................ 29
What Do I Need to Think About? .......................................................................................................................... 29
What Do I Need to Do? ......................................................................................................................................... 29
What Do I Need to Write? ..................................................................................................................................... 30
How Will the Evidence of My Teaching Practice Be Assessed? ........................................................................... 32
Assessment Rubrics ............................................................................................................................................. 33
Professional Responsibilities ........................................................................................................... 38
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Context for Learning Information.............................. 39
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Evidence Chart ............................................................ 42
Planning Task 1: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications .................................................................................. 42
Instruction Task 2: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications ............................................................................... 43
Assessment Task 3: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications ............................................................................ 44
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Glossary ....................................................................... 47
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
1 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
This document contains both information and definition pop-ups. To read information, use the Down Arrow from a form field.
Introduction to edTPA Middle Childhood
History/Social Studies
Purpose
The purpose of edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies, a nationally available
performance-based assessment, is to measure novice teachers’ readiness to teach
history/social studies to young adolescents. The assessment is designed with a focus on
young adolescent learning and principles from research and theory. It is based on findings
that successful teachers
develop knowledge of subject matter, content standards, and subject-specific
pedagogy
develop and apply knowledge of varied students’ needs
consider research and theory about how students learn
reflect on and analyze evidence of the effects of instruction on student learning
A
s a performance-based assessm
ent, edTPA is designed to engage candidates in
demonstrating their understanding of teaching and student learning in authentic ways.
Overview of the Assessment
The edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies assessment is composed of three
tasks:
1. Planning for Instruction and Assessment
2. Instructing and Engaging Students in Learning
3. Assessing Student Learning
For this assess
ment, you will first plan 3–5 consecutive history/social studies lessons
(or, if teaching history/social studies within a large time block, about 3–5 hours of
connected instruction) referred to as a learning segment. Consistent with the National
Curr
iculum Standards for Social Studies (NCSS)
1
and additional state and national content
standards
2
as appropriate, a learning segment prepared for this assessment should reflect a
balanced approach to history/social studies. This means your segment should include
learning tasks where young adolescents have opportunities to develop and apply the
knowl
edge, intellectual processes, and disciplinary practices required to become active and
1
The National Curriculum Standards for Social Studies developed by the National Council for Social Studies and the C3
Framework (College, Career and Civic Life) for Social Studies State Standards developed by 15 professional social studies
organizations, can be found at http://www.socialstudies.org/standards and
http://www.socialstudies.org/system/files/c3/C3-
Fr
amework-for-Social-Studies.pdf, respectively.
2
For example, the National Standards for History (National Center for History in the Schools, 1996), the Voluntary National
Content Standards in Economics (Council for Economic Education, 2010), Geography for Life: National Geography Standards
(Geography Education National Implementation Project, 2012), and the National Standards for Civics and Government (Center
for Civic Education, 1994).
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
2 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
productive citizens. In addition, your lesson plans should provide opportunities for learners
to develop and use facts, concepts, and the
skills of inquiry, interpretation or analysis to
build and suppor
t arguments or conclusions about historic
al events, a topic/theme, or a
social studies phenomenon.
Finally, consistent with the recommendations provided by the Association for Middle Level
Educati
on (AMLE),
3
a learning segment prepared for this assessment should be
“developmentally responsive, challenging, empowering, and equitable.” While the full scope
of AMLE’s recommendations will not be feasible in a short learning segment, you should
design your lessons to provide challenging and responsive opportunities for young
adolescents to learn history/social studies.
3
See the AMLE Middle Level Teacher Preparation Standards at
http://www.amle.org/AboutAMLE/ProfessionalPreparation/AMLEStandards/tabid/263/Default.aspx.
After you plan your learning segment, you will then teach the learning segment, making a
videorecording of your interactions with students during instruction. You will also assess,
informally and formally, students’ learning throughout the learning segment. Upon
completion of the three tasks, you will submit artifacts from the tasks (e.g., lesson plans,
clips f
rom your videorecording, assessment materials, instructional materials, student work
samples
), as well as commentaries that you have written to explain and reflect on the
Pl
anning, Instruction, and Assessment components of the tasks. The artifacts and
commentaries for each task will then be evaluated using rubrics especially developed for
each task.
The edTPA Tasks and the Cycle of Effective Teaching
The three edTPA tasks represent a cycle of effective teaching (i.e., teaching that is focused
on student learning). Planning Task 1 documents your intended teaching, Instruction Task
2 documents your enacted teaching, and Assessment Task 3 documents the impact of
your teaching on student learning.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
3 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
The three tasks and the evidence you provide for each are framed by your understandings
of your students and their learning. As you develop, document, and teach your lessons, you
will reflect upon the cyclical relationship among planning, instruction, and assessment, with
a focus on your students’ learning needs.
Evidence of Teaching Practice: Artifacts and Commentaries
An essential part of edTPA is the evidence you will submit of how you planned, taught, and
assessed your lessons to deepen young adolescent learning in history/social studies. This
evidence includes both artifacts and commentaries:
Artifacts represent authentic work completed by you and your students. These
incl
ude lesson plans, copies of instructional and assessment materials, video clips of
your teaching, and student work samples.
Commentaries are your opportunity to describe your artifacts, explain the rationale
behind thei
r choice, and analyze what you have learned about your teaching practice
and your students’ learning. Note that although your writing ability will not be scored
directly, commentaries must be clearly written and well focused.
When preparing your artifacts and commentaries, refer to the rubrics frequently to guide
your t
hinking, planning, and writing. Refer to the
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies
Evidence Chart for information about how your evidence should be formatted for electronic
submi
ssion.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
4 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Evaluation Criteria
The rubrics used to score your performance are included in this handbook, following the
sections describing the directions for each task. The descriptors in the five-level rubrics
address a wide range of performance, beginning with the knowledge and skills of a novice
not ready to teach (Level 1) and extending to the advanced practices of a highly
accomplished beginner (Level 5).
Structure of the Handbook
The following pages provide specific instructions on how to complete each of the three tasks
of the edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies assessment. After an overview of the
tasks, the handbook provides instructions for each task, organized into four sections:
1. What Do I Need to Think About?
This section provides focus questions for you to think about when completing the
task
.
2. What Do I Need to Do?
This section provides specific, detailed directions for completing the task.
3. What Do I Need to Write?
This section tells you what you need to write and also provides specific and detailed
directions for writing the commentary for the task.
4. How Will the Evidence of My Teaching Practice Be Assessed?
This section includes the rubrics that will be used to assess the evidence you provide
for t
he task.
Additional requirements and resources are provided for you in this handbook:
Professional Responsibilities: gui
delines for the development of your evidence
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Con
text for Learning Information:
promp
ts used to collect information about your school/classroom context
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Evidence Chart: sp
ecifications for
electronic submission of evidence (artifacts and commentaries), including templates,
supported file types, number of files, response length, and other important evidence
specifications
Glossary: definitions of key terms can be accessed by rolling your cursor over each
glos
sary term marked with a dotted underline throughout the handbook or by
referring to the Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Glossary.
Yo
u should review the Making Good Choices document prior to beginning the planning of
the l
earning segment. If you are in a preparation program, it will have additional resources
that provide guidance as you develop your evidence.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
5 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Review all instructions carefully before beginning to teach the learning segment to
ensure that you are well prepared for all tasks. Before you record your videos,
pay particular attention to the specific content focus of each video clip
submission; these foci are described in the What Do I Need to Do? sections in
Instruction Task 2 and Assessment Task 3. Refer to the Professional
Responsibilities section of this handbook for important information about
permissions, confidentiality, and other requirements.
If your program requires you to submit artifacts and commentaries for official
scoring, refer to www.edTPA.com for complete and current information before
beginning your work and to download templates for submitting materials. The
website contains information about the registration process, submission deadlines,
submission requirements, withdrawal/refund policies, and score reporting. It also
provides contact information should you have questions about your registration and
participation in edTPA.
Whether submitting directly to www.edTPA.com or via your program’s electronic
portfolio management system, follow the submission guidelines as documented in
the Evidence Chart and review edTPA Submission Requirements to ensure that
your materials conform to the required evidence specifications and requirements for
scoring.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
6 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Tasks
Overview
Planning Task 1: Planning for Instruction and Assessment
What to Do
Select one class as a focus for this
assessment.
Provide relevant context information.
Identify a learning segment to plan,
teach, an
d analyze student learning.
Your learning segment should include
3–5 consecutive lessons (or, if
teaching history/social studies within a
large time block, about 3–5 hours of
connected instruction).
Determine a central focus for your
lear
ning segment. The central focus
should support young adolescent
learners in learning and using facts,
concepts, and inquiry, interpretation, or
analysis skills to build arguments or
conclusions about historical events, a
topic/theme, or a social studies
phenomenon as well as to make
interdisciplinary connections.
Write and submit a lesson plan for each
lesson in the learning segment.
Select and submit key instructional
materi
als needed to understand what
you and the students will be doing.
Choose one language function and
other l
anguage demands important to
understanding middle childhood
history/social studies in your learning
segment. Identify a learning task where
students are supported to use this
language.
Respond to commentary prompts prior
to te
aching the learning segment.
Submit copies of all written
assessments and/o
r clear directions for
any oral or performance assessments
from the learning segment.
What to Submit
Part A: Context for Learning
Information
Part B: Lesson Plans for
Learni
ng Segment
Part C: Instructional Materials
Part D: Assessments
Part E: Planning Commentary
Evaluation Rubrics
Planning Rubrics
Rubric 1: Planning for
Histor
y/Social Studies
Understandings
Rubric 2: Planning to Support
Var
ied Student Learning Needs
Rubric 3: Using Knowledge of
Students to
Inform Teaching and
Learning
Rubric 4: Identifying and
Supp
orting Language Demands
Rubric 5: Planning Assessments to
Moni
tor and Support Student
Learning
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
7 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Instruction Task 2: Instructing and Engaging Students in Learning
What to Do
Obtain required permissions for
videorecording from parents/guardians
of your students and other adults
appearing in the video.
Identify lessons from the learning
segment yo
u planned in Planning Task
1 to be videorecorded. You should
choose lessons that show you
interacting with young adolescents to
develop their skills and strategies for
interpreting or analyzing sources and
accounts of historical events or social
studies phenomena and building and
supporting arguments or conclusions.
Videorecord your teaching and select 2
video clips (no more than 20 minutes
total running time, but not less than 3
minutes).
Analyze your teaching and your
students’
learning in the video clips by
responding to commentary prompts.
What to Submit
Part A: Video Clips
Part B: Instruction
Commentary
Evaluation Rubrics
Instruction Rubrics
Rubric 6: Learning Environment
Rubr
ic 7: Engaging Students in
Learni
ng
Rubric 8: Deepening Student
Learni
ng
Rubric 9: Subject-Specific
Peda
gogy
Rubric 10: Analyzing Teaching
Effecti
veness
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
8 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Assessment Task 3: Assessing Student Learning
What to Do
Select one assessment from the
learning segment that you will use to
evaluate your students’ developing
knowledge and skills. Attach the
assessment used to evaluate young
adolescent performance to the end of
the Assessment Commentary.
Submit the evaluation criteria you will
use to ana
lyze young adolescent
learning.
Collect and analyze young adolescent
work from the selected assessment to
identify quantitative and qualitative
patterns of learning within and across
learners in the class.
Select 3 student work samples to
ill
ustrate your analysis of patterns of
learning within and across learners in
the class. At least 1 of the samples
must be from a young adolescent with
specific learning needs. These 3
students will be your focus students.
Summarize the learning of the whole
class
, referring to work samples from
the 3 focus students to illustrate
patterns in student understanding
across the class.
Submit feedback for the work samples
for the
3 focus students in written,
audio, or video form.
Analyze evidence of young adolescents’
langu
age use from (1) the video clips
from Instruction Task 2, (2) an
additional video clip of one or more
students using language within the
learning segment, AND/OR (3) the
student work samples from Assessment
Task 3.
Analyze evidence of student learning,
and plan for next steps by responding to
commentary prompts.
What to Submit
Part A: Student Work
Samples
Part B: Evidence of Feedback
Part C: Assessment
Commentar
y
Part D: Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation Rubrics
Assessment Rubrics
Rubric 11: Analysis of Student
Lear
ning
Rubric 12: Providing Feedback to
Gui
de Learning
Rubric 13: Student
Understa
nding and Use of
Feedback
Rubric 14: Analyzing Students’
Language Use and History/Social
Studies Learning
Rubric 15: Using Assessment to
Infor
m Instruction
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
9 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Planning Task 1: Planning for Instruction
and Assessment
What Do I Need to Think About?
In Planning Task 1, you will describe your plans for the learning segment and explain how
your instruction is developmentally appropriate for young adolescents and the content you
are teaching. As you develop your plans, you need to think about the following:
What do your students know, what can they do, and what are they learning to do?
What do you want your students to learn? What are the important understandings,
core c
oncepts, and interdisciplinary connections you want students to develop within
the l
earning segment?
How will you use your knowledge of your students’ assets to inform your plans?
W
hat instructional strategies, learning tasks, and assessments w
ill you design to
support
young adolescent learning and language use?
How will your learning segment support students to develop and use language that
deepens cont
ent understanding?
How is the teaching you propose supported by research and theory about how young
adolesc
ents learn?
What Do I Need to Do?
Select a class. If you teach more than one class, select one focus class for this
assessment. If your placement for history/social studies has you responsible for a group
rather than a whole class, plans should describe instruction for that group (minimum of
4 students). That group will constitute “the whole class” for edTPA.
Provide context information. The Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Context for
Learning Information form is provided later in this handbook and must be submitted in a
tem
plate. This form provides essential information about your students and your
school/classroom. The context information you submit should be no more than 4
pages, including prompts.
Identify a learning segment to plan, teach, and analyze. Review the curriculum with
your cooperating teacher and select a learning segment of 3–5 consecutive lessons. (If
teaching history/social studies within a large time block, select a learning segment of
about 3–5 hours of connected instruction.)
Identify a central focus. Identify the central focus along with the content standards and
objectives you will address in the learning segment. The central focus should support
young adolescents in learning and using facts and concepts, and inquiry, i
nterpretation,
or analy
sis skills to build and support argument
s or conclusions about historical events,
a topic
/theme, or a social studies phenomenon, as well as support young adolescents in
making i
nterdisciplinary connections.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
10 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Identify and plan to support language demands. Select a key language function from
your learning objectives. Choose a learning task t
hat provides opportunities for students
to practice using that language function. Identify additional language demands
associated with that task. Plan targeted supports that address the identified language
demands, including the language function.
Write a lesson plan for each les
son in the learning segment. Your lesson plans should
be detailed enough that a substitute or other teacher could understand them well enough
to use them.
Your lesson plans must include the fol
lowing information, even if your teacher
preparation program requires you to use a specific lesson plan format:
State-adopted student academic content standards that are the target of student
learning (Note: Please include the number and text of each standard that is being
addressed. If only a portion of a standard is being addressed, then only list the part
or parts that are relevant.)
Learning objectives (subject-specific, relevant, interdisciplinary) associated with the
content standards
Informal and formal assessments used to monitor student learning, including type(s)
of assessment and what is being assessed
Instructional strategies and learning tasks (including what you and the students will
be doing) that support diverse student needs
Instructional resources and materials used to engage young adolescents in learning
Each lesson plan must
be no more than 4 pages in length. You will need to
condense or excerpt lesson plans longer than 4 pages. Any explanations or rationale for
decisions should be included in your Planning Commentary and deleted from your plans.
Respond to the com
mentary prompts listed in the Planning Commentary section
prior
to teaching the learning segment.
Submit your original lesson plans. If you mak
e changes while teaching the learning
segment, you may offer reflection on those changes in the Instruction Task 2 and
Assessment Task 3 Commentaries.
Select and submit key instructional materials needed to understand
what you and
the students will be doing (no more than 5 additional pages per lesson plan). The
instructional materials might include such items as class handouts, assignments, slides,
and interactive whiteboard images.
Submit copies of all written assessments and/or directions for any oral or
performance assessments. (Submit only the blank assessments given to students; do
not submit student work samples for this task.)
Provide citations for the source of all materials that you did not create (e.g.,
published texts, websites, and material from other educators). List all citations by lesson
number at the end of the Planning Commentary. Note: Citations do not count toward the
commentary page limit.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
11 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
See the Planning Task 1: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications in the Middle
Childhood History/Social Studies Evidence Chart for instructions on electronic
submission of evidence. This evidence chart identifies templates, supported file
types, number of files, response length, and other important evidence specifications.
Your evidence cannot contain hyperlinked content. Any web content you wish to
include as part of your evidence must be submitted as a document file, which must
conform to the file format and response length requirements.
What Do I Need to Write?
In Planning Task 1, you will write
a description of your Context for Learning (see “What Do I Need to Do?” above for
direc
tions)
lesson plans (see “What Do I Need to Do?” above for directions)
a comm
entary explaining your plans (see “Planning Commentary” below for
directions)
Planning Commentary
In Planning Task 1, you will write a commentary, responding to the prompts below. Your
commentary should be no more than 9 single-spaced pages, including the prompts.
1. Central Focus
a. Describe the central focus and purpose of the content you will teach in the
learning
segment.
b. Given the central focus, describe how the standards and learning objectives
withi
n your learning segment address
facts and concepts
inquiry, i
nterpr
etation, or analysis skills
building and supporting arguments or conclusions
c. Exp
lain how your plans build on each other to help young adolescents make
connections betw
een facts, concepts, and inquiry, interpretation, or analysis
skills to build and support arguments or conclusions about historical events, a
topic/theme, or a social studies phenomenon.
d. Explain how you will help young adolescents make interdisciplinary or integrative
connections between the central focus of the learning segment and other subject
areas.
2. Kno
wledge of Students to Inform Teaching
For each of the prom
pts below (2ac), describe what you know about your students
with respect to the central focus of the learning segment.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
12 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Consider the variety of young adolescent learners in your class who may require
different strategies/support (e.g., students with IEPs or 504 plans, English language
learners, struggling readers, underperforming students or those with gaps in
academic knowledge, and/or gifted students).
a. Prior academic learning and prerequisite skills related to the cen
tr
al focusCite
evidence of what youn
g adolescents know, what they can do, and what
they are still learning to do.
b. Personal, cultural, and com
munity assets related to the central focusWhat do
you know about your students’ everyday experiences, cultural and
language backgrounds and practices, and interests?
c. Young adolescent developmental assets related to the central focusWhat do
you know about your students’ cognitive, physical, and social and
emoti
onal developmen
t?
3. Supporting StudentsHistory/Soci
al Studies Learning
Respond to prompts 3a–d below. To support your justifications, refer to the
instructional materials and lesson plans you have included as part of Planning Task
1. In addition, support your justifications using principles from research and/or theory,
including how the research/theory reflects elements of young adolescent
development.
a. Justify how your understanding of your students’ prior academic learning (from
prompt 2a above) guided your choice or adaptation of learning tasks and
materials. Be explicit about the connections between the learning tasks and
students’ prior academic learning and research/theory.
b. Justify how your understanding of your students’ personal, cultural, community,
and developmental assets (from prompts 2bc above) guided your choice or
adaptation of learning tasks and materials. Be explicit about the connections
between the learning tasks and students’ assets and research/theory.
c. Describe and justify why your instructional strategies and planned supports are
appropriate for
the whole class, individuals, and groups of young
adolescents with specific learning needs.
d. Describe key misconceptions within your central focus and how you w
ill address
them.
Consider the variety of young adolescent learners in your class who may require
different strategies/support (e.g., students with IEPs or 504 plans, English language
learners, struggling readers, underperforming students or those with gaps in
academic knowledge, and/or gifted students).
4. Supporting History/Social Studies Development Through Language
As you respond to prompts 4ad, consider the range of students’ language assets
and needswhat do students already know, what are they struggling with, and/or
what is new to them?
a. Language Function. Using information about your students’ language assets
and needs, identify one language function essential for young adolescents to
learn the history/social studies content within your central focus. Listed below are
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
13 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
some sample language functions. You may choose one of these or another more
appropriate for your learning segment.
Analyze Compare/contrast Construct Describe Evaluate
Examine Identify Interpret Justify Locate
b. Identify a key learning task from your plans that provides young adolescents with
opportunities t
o practice using the language function identified above. Identify the
lesson in which the learning task occurs. (Give lesson day/number.)
c. Additional Language Demands. Given the language function and learning task
identified above, describe the following associated language demands (written or
oral) young adolescents need to understand and/or use:
Vocabulary/
symbols
Plus at least one of the following:
Syntax
Disc
ourse
d. Language Supports. Refer to y
our lesson plans and instructional materials as
needed in your response to the prompt below.
Identify and describe the planned instructi
onal supports (during and/or prior to
the learning task) to help young adolescents understand, develop, and use
the identified language demands (function, vocabulary/symbols, discourse, or
syntax).
5. Monitoring Student Learning
In response t
o the prompts below, refer to the assessments you will submit as part of
the materials for Planning Task 1.
a. Describe how the planned formal and informal assessments provide direct
evidence of how young adolescents learn and use facts, concepts, and inquiry,
interpretation, or analysis skills to build and support arguments or conclusions
about historical events, a topic/theme, or a social studies phenomenon
throughout the learning segment.
b. Explain how the design or adaptation of your planned assessments allows young
adolescents with specific needs to demonstrate their learning.
Consider the variety of young adolescent learners in your class who may require
different strategies/support (e.g., young adolescents with IEPs or 504 plans, English
language learners, struggling readers, underperforming students or those with gaps
in academic knowledge, and/or gifted students).
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
14 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
How Will the Evidence of My Teaching Practice Be
Assessed?
For Planning Task 1, your evidence will be assessed using rubrics 1–5, which appear on the
following pages. When preparing your artifacts and commentaries, refer to the rubrics
fr
equently to guide your thinking, planning, and writing.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
15 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Planning Rubrics
Rubric 1: Planning for History/Social Studies Understandings
How do the candidate’s plans build young adolescents’ understandings of facts, concepts, and inquiry,
interpretation, or analysis skills to build and support arguments or conclusions about historical events or a
social studies phenomenon?
Level 1
4
Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Candidate’s plans for instruc-
tion focus solely on facts or a
singular interpretation of
historical events, a topic/
theme, or a social studies
phenomenon with little or no
connections to
concepts AND
inquiry, interpretations, or
analyses.
OR
There are significant content
inaccuracies
that will lead to
student misunderstandings.
OR
Standards, objectives, and
learning task
s and materials
are not aligned with each
other.
Candidate’s plans for
instructi
on support student
learning of facts with vague
connections to
concepts AND
inquiry, interpretations, or
analyses.
Candidate’s plans for
instructi
on build on each
other to support student
learning of facts with clear
connections to
concepts AND
inquiry, interpretations, or
analyses.
Candidate’s plans for
instructi
on build on each other
to support student learning of
facts with clear and
consistent connections to
concepts;
inquiry, interpretations, or
analyses; AND
building arguments or
conclusions.
Plans support history/social
studies learni
ng and imply
interdisciplinary
connections.
Level 4 plus:
Candidate explains how s/he
will lead young adolescents
to build explicit connections
between inquiry,
interpretations, or analyses
and supporting arguments
or conclusions as well as
explicit and relevant
interdisciplinary
connections.
4
Text representing key differences between adjacent score levels is shown in bold. Evidence that does not meet Level 1 criteria is scored at Level 1.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Planning Rubrics continued
16 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 2: Planning to Support Varied Student Learning Needs
How does the candidate use knowledge of his/her students to target support for young adolescents to develop
understandings of facts, concepts, and inquiry, interpretations, or analyses to build arguments or conclusions?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
There is no evidence of
planned supports.
OR
Candidate does not attend to
ANY INSTR
UCTIONAL
requirements in IEPs and 504
plans.
Planned supports are loosely
tied to learnin
g objectives or
the central focus of the
learning segment.
Planned supports are tied to
learning objectives and the
central focus with attention to
the characteristics of the
class as a whole.
Planned supports are tied to
learning objectives and the
central focus. Supports
address the needs of
specific individuals or
groups with similar needs.
Level 4 plus:
Supports include specific
stra
tegies to identify and
respond to key
misconceptions.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Planning Rubrics continued
17 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 3: Using Knowledge of Students to Inform Teaching and Learning
How does the candidate use knowledge of his/her students to justify instructional plans?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Candidate’s justification of
learning tasks is either
missing OR represents a
deficit view of young
adolescents and their
backgrounds.
Candidate justifies learning
tasks with limited attention to
young adolescents’
prior academic learning
OR
personal, cultural,
community, or
developmental assets.
Candidate justifies why
lear
ning tasks (or their
adaptations) are appropriate
using examples of young
adolescents
prior academic learning
OR
personal, cultural,
community, or
developmental assets.
Candidate makes superficial
connect
ions to research
and/or theory.
Candidate justifies why
lear
ning tasks (or their
adaptations) are appropriate
using examples of young
adolescents
prior academic learning
AND
personal, cultural,
community, or
developmental assets.
Candidate makes
c
onnections to research
and/or theory, including young
adolescent development.
Level 4 plus:
Candidate’s justification is
supported b
y principles from
research and/or theory,
including young adolescent
development.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Planning Rubrics continued
18 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 4: Identifying and Supporting Language Demands
How does the candidate identify and support language demands associated with a key history/social studies
learning task?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Language demands
5
identified
by the candidate are not
consistent with the selected
language function
6
OR task.
OR
Language supports are
missing or are not aligned
with the language demand(s)
for the learning task.
Language supports primarily
address one language
demand (vocabulary/symbols,
function, syntax, discourse).
General language supports
address use of two or more
language demands
(vocabulary/symbols, function,
syntax, discourse).
Targeted language supports
address use o
f
vocabulary/symbols,
language function, AND
one or more additional
language demands
(syntax, discourse).
Level 4 plus:
Language supports are
designed to m
eet the needs
of young adolescents with
different levels of language
learning.
5
Language demands include: language function, vocabulary/symbols, syntax, and discourse (organizational structures, text structure, etc.).
6
Language function refers to the learning outcome (verb) selected in prompt 4a (e.g., analyze, interpret).
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Planning Rubrics continued
19 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 5: Planning Assessments to Monitor and Support Student Learning
How are the informal and formal assessments selected or designed to monitor young adolescents’ progress
toward understanding and use of facts, concepts, and inquiry, interpretations, or analyses to build arguments
or conclusions?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
The assessments only
provide evidence of young
adolescents’ recall of
history/social studies facts.
OR
Candidate does not attend to
ANY ASS
ESSMENT
requirements in IEPs and 504
plans.
The assessments provide
limite
d evidence to monitor
young adolescents’ progress
toward developing
history/social studies
understandings and use of
facts, concepts, AND
inquiry, interpretations,
or analyses
during the learning segment.
The assessmen
ts provide
evidence
to monitor young
adolescents’ progress toward
developing history/social
studies understandings and
use of
facts, concepts, AND
inquiry, interpretations, or
analyses
during the learning segment.
The assessmen
ts provide
multiple
forms of evidence to
monitor young adolescents’
progress toward developing
history/social studies
understandings and use of
facts, concepts, AND
inquiry, interpretations, or
analyses
to build arguments or
conc
lusions throughout the
learning segment.
Level 4 plus:
The assessments are
stra
tegically designed to
allow individuals or groups
with specific needs to
demonstrate their learning.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
20 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Instruction Task 2: Instructing and
Engaging Students in Learning
What Do I Need to Think About?
In Instruction Task 2, you will demonstrate how you support and engage young adolescents
in learning. Before you begin your instruction, you need to think about the following:
What kind of learning environment do you want to devel
op in order to establish
respect and rapport and t
o support young adol
escents’ engagement in learning?
What kinds of learning ta
sks actively engage young adolescents in the central focus
of the learning segment?
How will you elicit and build on young adolescents’ responses in ways that develop
and deepen content
understanding?
In what ways
will you connect new content to young adolescentsprior academic
learning and personal, cultural, community, or developm
ental assets during your
inst
ruction?
How will you use evidence from your instruction to examine and change your
teachi
ng practices to more effectively meet a variety of young adolescent learning
needs?
What Do I Need to Do?
Obtain required permissions for videorecording. Before you record your video,
ensure that you have the appropriate permission from the parents/guardians of your
students and from adults who appear in the video. Adjust the camera angle to exclude
individuals for whom you do not have permission to film.
Examine your plans for the learning segment and identify challenging learning tasks
in which you and young adolescents are actively engaged. The video clips you select for
submission should provide samples of how you develop young adolescents’ abilities to
use sources, form interpretations or analyses, and to build and support arguments or
concl
usions.
Identify lessons to videorecord.
Provide 2 video
clips (no more than 20 minutes total, but not less than 3 minutes)
that demonstrate how you interact with young adolescents in a positive learning
environment to develop their ability to interpret or analyze accounts of historical events
or a social studies phenomenon and to build and support their arguments or
c
onclusions.
The first clip should illust
rate how you engage young adolescent learners in tasks
that develop their skills of inquiry, interpretation, or analysis of history social studies
sourc
es or accounts to build and support arguments or conclusions.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
21 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
The second clip should focus on how you supported young adolescents in using
evidence from sources to form interpretations or analyses and to build and support
arguments or conclusions about historical events, a topic/theme, or a social studies
phenomenon.
(Optional) Provide evidence of students’ language use. You may provide evidence
of language use with your video clips from Instruction Task 2, an additional video clip of
one or more students using language within the learning segment (no more than 5
minutes in length), AND/OR through the student work samples analyzed in
Assessment Task 3.
Determine whether you will feature the whole class or a targeted group of students
(minimu
m of 4 students) within the class.
Videorecord your classroom teaching. Tips for videorecording your class are
available from your teacher preparation program.
Select video clips to submit and verify that the clips meet the following requirements:
Check the video and sound quality to ensure that you and your students can be seen
and heard on the video clips you submit. If most of the audio in a clip cannot be
understood by a scorer, submit another clip. If there are occasional audio portions
of a clip that cannot be understood that are relevant to your commentary
responses
,
do one of t
he following: 1) provide a transcript with time stamps of the inaudible
portion and refer to the transcript in your response; 2) embed quotes with time-stamp
references in the commentary response; or 3) insert captions in the video (captions
for this purpose will be considered permissible editing).
A video clip must be continuous and unedited, with no interruption in events.
If you have inadv
ertently included individuals for whom you do not have permission
to film in the video clip(s) you plan to submit, you may use software to blur the faces
of these individuals. This is not considered editing. Other portions of the submitted
video clip(s), including the classroom, your face, and the faces of individuals for
whom you have obtained permission to film, should remain unblurred.
Do not include the name of the state, school, or district in your video. Use first names
only for
all individuals appearing in the video.
Respond to the prompts listed in the Instruction Commentary section below after
viewing the video clips.
Determine if additional information is needed to understand what you and the
students are doing in the video clips. For example, if there are graphics, texts, or
images that are not clearly visible in the video, or comments that are not clearly heard,
you may insert digital copies or transcriptions at the end of the Instruction Commentary
(no more than 2 pages in addition to the responses to commentary prompts).
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
22 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
See the Instruction Task 2: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications in the Middle
Childhood History/Social Studies Evidence Chart for instructions on electronic
submission of evidence. This evidence chart identifies templates, supported file
types, number of files, response length, and other important evidence specifications.
Your evidence cannot contain hyperlinked content. Any web content you wish to
include as part of your evidence must be submitted as a document file, which must
conform to the file format and response length requirements.
What Do I Need to Write?
Instruction Commentary
In Instruction Task 2, you will write a commentary, responding to the prompts below. Your
commentary should be no more than 6 single-spaced pages, including the prompts. If
needed, insert no more than 2 additional pages of supporting documentation for the
videorecordings at the end of the commentary (e.g., digital copies of indiscernible materials
or transcriptions of inaudible comments). These additional pages do not count toward the
commentary page limit noted above.
1. Which lesson or lessons are shown in the video clips? Identify the lesson(s) by
less
on plan number.
2. Promoting a Positive Learning Environment
Refer to scenes in the video clips where you provided a positive learning
envir
onment.
a. How did you demonstrate mutual respect for, rapport with, and responsiveness to
young adol
escents with varied needs (academic and developmental) and
backgrounds, and challenge young adolescents to engage in learning?
3. Engaging Students in Learning
Refer to examples from the video clips in your responses to the prompts.
a. Explain how your instruction engaged young adolescents in
developing the skills of inquiry, interpretation, or analysis in relation to
sourc
es or accounts of historical events or a social studies phenomenon
building and supporting arguments or conclusions
b. Describe how your instruction linked young adolescents’ prior academic learning
and personal
, cultural, community, or developmental assets with new learning.
4. Deepening Student Learning during Instruction
Refer to examples from the clips in your explanations.
a. Explain how you elicited and built on student responses that supported young
adolesc
entsability to form inquiries, interpretations, or analyses of history/social
studies sources or accounts AND build and support arguments or conclusions.
b. Describe and cite examples from the video clips of how you supported young
adolescents in using evidence from one or more sources to support
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
23 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
interpretations or analyses and arguments or conclusions about historical events
or a social studies phenomenon.
5. Analyzing Teaching
Refer to examples from the vi
deo clips in your responses to the prompts.
a. What changes would you make to your instructionfor the whole class and/or for
student
s who need greater support or challengeto better support student
learning of the central focus (e.g., missed opportunities)?
Consider the variety of young adolescent learners in your class who may re
quire
different strategies/support (e.g., students with IEPs or 504 plans, English
language learners, struggling readers, underperforming students or those with
gaps in academic knowledge, and/or gifted students).
b. Why do you think these changes would improv
e young adolescent learning?
Support your explanation with evidence of young adolescent learning AND
principles from theory and/or research, including young adolescent development.
How Will the Evidence of My Teaching Practice Be
Assessed?
For Instruction Task 2, your evidence will be assessed using rubrics 610, which appear on
the following pages. When preparing your artifacts and commentaries, refer to the rubrics
frequently to guide your thinking, instruc
tion, and writing.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
24 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Instruction Rubrics
Rubric 6: Learning Environment
How does the candidate demonstrate a positive learning environment that supports young adolescents’
engagement in learning?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
The clips reveal evidence of
disrespectful interactions
between teacher and young
adolescents or between
young adolescents.
OR
Candidate allows disruptive
behavior to in
terfere with
young adolescent learning.
The candidate demonstrates
respect
for young
adolescents.
AND
Candidate provides a
learning environm
ent that
serves primarily to control
young adolescent behavior,
and minimally supports the
learning goals.
The candidate demonstrates
rapport w
ith and respect for
young adolescents.
AND
Candidate provides a positive,
low-ris
k learning
environment that reveals
mutual respect among
young adolescents.
The candidate demonstrates
rappor
t with and respect for
young adolescents.
AND
Candidate provides a
challe
nging learning
environment that promotes
mutual respect among young
adolescents.
The candidate demonstrates
rappo
rt with and respect for
young adolescents.
AND
Candidate provides a
chall
enging learning
environment that provides
opportunities to express
varied perspectives and
promotes mutual respect
among young adolescents.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Instruction Rubrics continued
25 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 7: Engaging Students in Learning
How does the candidate engage young adolescents in inquiry, interpretation, or analysis of history/social
studies sources or accounts and building arguments or conclusions?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Young adolescents are
participating in tasks that
are vaguely or superficially
connected to historical
events or social studies
phenomena.
Young adolescents are
participating in learning tasks
focusing primarily on facts
or single interpretations.
Young adolescents are
engaged in learning tasks that
address their skills of
inquiry, interpretation, or
analysis of history/social
studies sources or accounts.
Young adolescents are
engaged in learning tasks that
develop their skills of inquiry,
interpretation, or analysis of
history/social studies sources
or accounts AND in building
arguments or conclusions.
Level 4 plus:
Learning tasks deepen
knowledge, extend skills,
AND provide evidence of
students supporting their
arguments or conclusions.
There is little or no evidence
that t
he candidate links
young adolescents’ prior
academic learning or personal,
cultural, community, or
developmental assets with new
learning.
Candidate makes vague or
superficial links between prior
academic learning and new
learning.
Candidate links prior
academic learning to new
learning.
Candidate links prior academic
learning AND personal,
cultural, community, or
developmental assets to new
learning.
Candidate prompts young
adolescents to link prior
academic learning AND
personal, cultural, community,
or developmental assets to
new learning.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Instruction Rubrics continued
26 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 8: Deepening Student Learning
How does the candidate elicit young adolescent learners’ responses to promote their ability to inquire about,
interpret, or analyze history/social studies sources/accounts and to build arguments or conclusions?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Candidate does most of the
talking and young
adolescents provide few
responses.
OR
Candidate responses include
significant
content
inaccuracies that will lead to
young adolescent
misunderstandings.
Candidate primarily asks
surface-
level questions and
evaluates young adolescents’
responses as correct or
incorrect.
Candidate elicits young
adolescents’ responses that
require interpretations or
analyses of history/social
studies sources or accounts.
Candidate elicits and builds
on young adolescents’
responses to develop
interpretations or analyses of
history/social studies sources
or accounts OR to build
arguments or conclusions.
Level 4 plus:
Candidate facilitates
interactions among young
adolescents to develop their
abilities to evaluate their own
interpretations, analyses,
arguments, or conclusions.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Instruction Rubrics continued
27 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 9: Subject-Specific Pedagogy
How does the candidate support young adolescents in using evidence from sources as they interpret or analyze
and build and support arguments or conclusions?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Candidate primarily focuses
on facts with little or no
attention to interpretation,
analysis, or building
arguments or conclusions.
Candidate provides limited
opportunities for young
adolescents to interpret
source(s) or build arguments
or conclusions because they
are primarily focused on
demonstrating these skills
for the class.
Candidate prompts young
adol
escents to use evidence
from source(s) as the
students interpret, analyze,
OR build arguments or
conclusions.
Candidate supports young
adolescents in using
evidence from multiple
sources to build and support
arguments or conclusions.
Level 4 plus:
Candidate uses counter or
alte
rnative evidence from
source(s) to challenge young
adolescents to support
arguments or conclusions.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Instruction Rubrics continued
28 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 10: Analyzing Teaching Effectiveness
How does the candidate use evidence to evaluate and change teaching practice to meet young adolescents’
varied learning needs?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Candidate suggests changes
unrelated to evidence of
young adolescent learning.
Candidate proposes changes
to teacher practice that are
superficially related to
student learning needs (e.g.,
task management, pacing,
improving directions).
Candidate proposes changes
that address young
adolescents’ collective
learning needs related to the
central focus.
Candidate makes superficial
connect
ions to research
and/or theory.
Candidate proposes changes
that add
ress individual and
collective learning needs
related to the central focus.
Candidate makes
connect
ions to research
and/or theory, including young
adolescent development.
Level 4 plus:
Candidate justifies changes
using principles
from
research and/or theory,
including young adolescent
development.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
29 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Assessment Task 3: Assessing Student
Learning
What Do I Need to Think About?
In Assessment Task 3, you will analyze both student learning and student use of language.
Before you begin the analysis, you need to think about the following:
How will you gather evidence and make sense of what students have learned?
How will you provide meaningful feedback to your students?
How will you use evidence of what students know and are able to do to plan next
st
eps in instruction?
How will you identify evidence of and explain students’ use of language that
demonst
rates the development of content understanding?
What Do I Need to Do?
Select one assessment from your learning segment you will use to evaluate your
students’ developing knowledge and skills. It should be an assessment that is completed
by the whole class featured in the learning segment. (If you are teaching only a group
within the class for the learning segment, that group will be “the whole class.”) The
assessment should reflect the work of individuals, not groups, but may be individual
work from a group task. The assessment should provide opportunities for students to
demonstrate their ability to do the following:
understand/use facts and concepts
use
inquiry, interpretation, or analysis skills
build and support arguments or conclusions
D
efine and submit the evaluation criteria you will use to analyze young adol
escent
learning related to the history/social studies understandings described above.
Collect and analyze student work from the selected assessment to identify
quantit
ative and qualitative patterns of learning within and across learners in t
he class.
You may submit text files with scanned student work, a video or audio file of a student’s
oral work, OR a student-created video or multimedia file. For each focus student, a video
or audio work sample must be no more than 5 minutes in total running time.
Select 3 student work samples that represent
the patterns of learning (i.e., what
individuals or groups generally understood and what a number of young adolescents
were still struggling to understand) you identified in your assessment analysis. These
students will be your focus students for this task. At least one of the focus students
must have specific learning needs, for example, a student with an IEP (Individualized
Education Program) or 504 plan, an English language learner, a struggling reader, an
underperforming student or a student with gaps in academic knowledge, and/or a gifted
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
30 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
student needing greater support or challenge. Note: California candidates must include
one focus student who is an English language learner.
7
Document the feedback you gave to each of the 3 focus students on the work sample
itself, as an audio clip, or as a video clip. You must submit evidence of the actual
feedback provided to each focus student, and not a description of the feedback.
If you submit a student work sample or feedback as a video or audi
o clip and comments
made by you or your focus student(s) cannot be clearly heard, do one of the following: 1)
attach a transcription of the inaudible comments (no more than 2 additional pages) to
the end of the Assessment Commentary; 2) embed quotes with time-stamp references in
the commentary response; or 3) insert captions in the video (captions for this purpose
will be considered permissible editing).
If you submit a student work sample or feedback as a video or audio clip and additional
students
are present, clearly identify which students are your focus students in the
relevant prompts (1d and 2a) of the Assessment Commentary (in no more than 2
sentences).
Respond to the prompts listed in the Assessment Commentary section below after
analyzing student work from the selected assessment.
Include and submit the chosen assessment, including the directions/prompts
provided t
o students. Attach the assessment (no more than 5 additional pages) to
the end of the Assessment Commentary.
Provide evidence of young adolescents’ understanding and use of the targeted
academic l
anguage function and other language demands. You m
ay choose
evi
dence from the video clips submitted in Instruction Task 2, an additional video clip of
one or more students using language within the learning segment (no more than 5
minutes in length), AND/OR student work samples submitted in Assessment Task 3.
7
California candidatesIf you do not have any English language learners, select a student who is challenged by academic
English.
See the Assessment Task 3: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications in the Middle
Childhood History/Social Studies Evidence Chart for instructions on electronic
submission of evidence. This evidence chart identifies templates, supported file
types, number of files, response length, and other important evidence specifications.
Your evidence cannot contain hyperlinked content. Any web content you wish to
include as part of your evidence must be submitted as a document file, which must
conform to the file format and response length requirements.
What Do I Need to Write?
Assessment Commentary
In Assessment Task 3, you will write a commentary, responding to the prompts below. Your
commentary should be no more than 10 single-spaced pages, including the prompts.
Attach the assessment used to evaluate student performance (no more than 5 additional
pages) and, if necessary, a transcription of inaudible portions of a video or audio clip of
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
31 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
feedback or a student work sample (no more than 2 additional pages) to the end of the
Assessment Commentary. These additional pages do not count toward the commentary
page limit noted above.
1. Analyzing Student Learning
a. Identi
fy the specific learning objectives measured
by the assessment you chose
for analysis.
b. Provide a graphic (table or chart) or narrative that summarizes student learning
for y
our whole class. Be sure to summarize student learning for all evaluation
criteria submitted in Assessment Task 3, Part D.
c. Use evidence found in the 3 student work samples and the whole class
summary to analyze the patterns of learning for the whole class and
differences for groups or individual learners relative to
facts and concepts
inquiry, interpretation, or analysis skills
building and supporting arguments or conclusions
Consider what young adolescents understand and do well, and where they
continue to struggle (e.g., common errors, confusions, need for greater
challenge).
d. If a video or audio work sample occurs in a group context (e.g., discussion),
provide the name of the clip and clearly describe how the scorer can identify the
focus student(s) (e.g., position, physical description) whose work is portrayed.
2. Feedback to Guide Further Learning
Refer to specific evidence of submitted feedback to support your explanations.
a. Identify the format in which you submitted your evidence of feedback for the 3
focus students. Choose one of the following:
Written directly on work samples or in separate documents that were provided
to the focus students
In audio files
In video clips from Instruction Task 2 (provide a time-stamp reference) or in
separate video clips
If a video or audio clip of feedback occurs in a group context (e.g., discussion),
clearly describe how the scorer can identify the focus student (e.g., position,
physical description) who is being given feedback.
b. Explain how feedback provided to the 3 focus students addresses their individual
strengths and needs relative to the learning objectives measured.
c. Describe how you will support each focus student to understand and use this
feedback to further their learning related to learning objectives, either within the
learning segment or at a later time.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
32 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
3. Evidence of Language Understanding and Use
When responding to the prompt below, use concrete examples from the clip(s)
and/or s
tudent work samples as evidence. Evidence from the clip(s) may focus on
one or more students.
You may provide evidence of students’ language use from ONE, TWO, OR ALL
THR
EE of the following sources:
1. Use video clips from Instruction Task 2 and provide time-stamp references for
evidenc
e of language use.
2. Submit an additional video file named “Language Use” of no more than 5
minut
es in length and cite language use (this can be footage of one or more
students’ language use). Submit the clip in Assessment Task 3, Part B.
3. Use the student work samples analyzed in Assessment Task 3 and cite
langua
ge use.
a. Explain and provide concrete examples for the extent to which your students
were abl
e to use or struggled to use the
selected language function,
vocabulary/
symbols, AND
discourse or syntax
to dev
elop conten
t understandings.
4. Using Assessment to Inform Instruction
a. Based on your analysis of young adolescent learning presented in prompts 1b–
c
, des
cribe next steps for instruction to impact student learning:
For the whole class
For the 3 focus students and other individuals/groups with specific needs
Consider the variety of young adolescent learners
in your class who may require
diff
erent strategies/support (e.g., students with IEPs or 504 plans, English
language learners, struggling readers, underperforming students or those with
gaps in academic knowledge, and/or gifted students).
b. Explain how these next steps follow from your analysis of young adolescent
lear
ning. Support your explanation with principles from research and/or theory as
well as young adolescent development.
How Will the Evidence of My Teaching Practice Be
Assessed?
For Assessment Task 3, your evidence will be assessed using rubrics 1115, which appear
on the following pages. When preparing your artifacts and commentaries, refer to the rubrics
frequently to guide your t
hinking, planning, instruction, assessment, and writing.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
33 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Assessment Rubrics
Rubric 11: Analysis of Student Learning
How does the candidate analyze evidence of young adolescent learning of facts and concepts, inquiry,
interpretation, or analysis skills, and building arguments or conclusions about historical events or a social
studies phenomenon?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
The analysis is superficial or
not supported by either work
samples or the summary of
young adolescent learning.
OR
The evaluation criteria,
learning object
ives, and/or
analysis are not aligned with
each other.
The analysis focuses on what
young adolescent
s did right
OR wrong.
The analysis focuses on what
young adolescents did right
AND wrong.
AND
Analysis includes some
differences in whole class
learning.
The analysis uses specific
examples from work samples
to demonstrate patterns of
learning consistent with the
summary.
AND
Patterns of learning are
described for
whole class.
The analysis uses specific
evidence
from work samples
to demonstrate the
connections between
quantitative and qualitative
patterns of learning for
individuals or groups.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Assessment Rubrics continued
34 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 12: Providing Feedback to Guide Learning
What type of feedback does the candidate provide to focus students?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Feedback is unrelated to the
learning objectives OR is
developmentally
inappropriate.
OR
Feedback contains
significant
content
inaccuracies.
OR
No feedback is provided to
one or more focus
students.
Feedback is general and
addresses
needs AND/OR
strengths related to the
learning objectives.
Feedback is specific and
addresses either needs OR
strengths related to the
learning objectives.
Feedback is specific and
addresses both strengths
AND needs related to the
learning objectives.
Level 4 plus:
Feedback for one or more
focus students
provides a strategy to
address an individual
learning need OR
makes connections to
prior learning or
experience to improve
learning.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Assessment Rubrics continued
35 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 13: Student Understanding and Use of Feedback
How does the candidate support focus students to understand and use the feedback to guide their further
learning?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Opportunities for
understanding or using
feedback are not described.
OR
Candidate provides limited
or no feedbac
k to inform
student learning.
Candidate provides vague
description o
f how focus
students will understand or
use feedback.
Candidate describes how
focus students will understand
or use feedback related to the
learning objectives.
Candidate describes how s/he
will support focus students to
understand and use feedback
on their strengths OR
weaknesses related to the
learning objectives.
Candidate describes how s/he
will support focus students to
understand and use feedback
on their strengths AND
weaknesses related to the
learning objectives.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Assessment Rubrics continued
36 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 14: Analyzing Students’ Language Use and History/Social Studies Learning
How does the candidate analyze young adolescents’ use of language to develop content understanding?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Candidate identifies student
language use that is
superficially related or
unrelated to the language
demands (function,
8
vocabulary/symbols, and
additional demands).
OR
Candidate’s description or
explanation of la
nguage use
is not consistent with the
evidence submitted.
Candidate describes how
young adolescents use
only
one language demand
(vocabulary/symbols,
function, syntax, discourse).
Candidate explains and
provides evidence of young
adolescentsuse of
the language function
AND
one or more additional
language demands
(vocabulary/symbols,
syntax, discourse).
9
Candidate explains and
provides evidence of young
adolescents’ use of
the language function,
vocabulary/symbols,
AND
additional language
demand(s) (syntax,
discourse)
in ways that develop content
understandings.
Level 4 plus:
Candidate explains and
provides evidence of
langua
ge use and content
learning for young
adolescents with varied
needs.
8
Previous footnote is now obsolete and has been deleted.
9
Previous footnote is now obsolete and has been deleted.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Assessment Rubrics continued
37 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Rubric 15: Using Assessment to Inform Instruction
How does the candidate use the analysis of what young adolescents know and are able to do to plan next steps
in instruction?
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Next steps do not follow from
the analysis.
OR
Next steps are not relevant to
the learning o
bjectives
assessed.
OR
Next steps are not described
in sufficient detail to
understand them.
Next steps primarily focus on
changes t
o teaching practice
that are superficially related
to young adolescent
learning needs, for example,
repeating instruction,
pacing, or classroom
management issues.
Next steps propose general
support that improves young
adolescent learning related
to assessed learning
objectives.
Next steps are loosely
connect
ed with research
and/or theory.
Next steps provide targeted
support t
o individuals or
groups to improve their
learning relative to
facts and concepts OR
inquiry, interpretations,
or analyses OR
building and supporting
arguments or
conclusions.
Next steps are connected with
research and/or theory,
including young adolescent
development.
Next steps provide targeted
suppor
t to individuals AND
groups to improve their
learning relative to
facts and concepts AND
inquiry, interpretations, or
analyses AND
building and supporting,
arguments or conclusions.
Next steps are justified with
principles f
rom research
and/or theory, including young
adolescent development.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
38 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Professional Responsibilities
Refer to the following table for an overview of your professional responsibilities in
developing evidence for edTPA. If you are submitting artifacts and commentaries for official
scoring, refer to www.edTPA.com for complete and current information before beginning
your
work. Included here are important information and policies such as submission
requirements and deadlines, registration agreements, attestations, permissions, and
confidentiality. Whether or not you are submitting for official scoring, you should fulfill the
professional responsibilities described below.
Responsibility Description
Protect
confidentiality
To protect confidentiality, please remove your name and use pseudonyms or general
references (e.g., “the district”) for your state, school, district, and cooperating teacher. Mask
or remove all names on any typed or written material (e.g., commentaries, lesson plans,
student work samples) that could identify individuals or institutions. During videorecording,
use students’ first names only.
To ensure confidentiality of your students and yourself, do not share your video on any
public
ly accessible platforms or websites (YouTube, Facebook, etc.).
Acquire
permissions
Before you record your classroom instruction, ensure that you have the appropriate
permission from the parents/guardians of your students and from adults who appear in the
videorecording.
Your program will provide you with procedures and necessary forms to obtain these
permi
ssions, according to agreements with the school or district in which you are student
teaching or completing your internship.
If your program does not provide the necessary forms, you may refer to the sample forms
found on www.edTPA.com
.
T
he release forms are not to be submitted with your materials, but you should follow your
campus
policy for retaining them.
Cite sources
Provide citations for the source of all materials that you did not create (e.g., published texts,
websites, and material from other educators). List all citations by lesson number at the end of
the Planning Commentary. Note: Citations do not count toward the commentary page limit.
Align instruction
with state
standards
As part of the assessment, you will document the alignment of your lesson plans with state-
adopted academic content standards that are the target of student learning. Refer to the
education agency website for your state to obtain copies of relevant standards for this
assessment.
Follow the
guidelines for
candidate support
at
www.edTPA.com
Follow the guidelines for candidate support found at www.edTPA.com as you develop your
evidence for edTPA. Although you may seek and receive appropriate support from your
university supervisors, cooperating/master teachers, university instructors, or peers during
this process, the ultimate responsibility for completing this assessment lies with you.
Therefore, when you submit your completed work, you must be able to confirm your
adher
ence with certain statements, such as the following:
I have primary responsibility for teaching the students/class during the learning segment
profiled in this assessment.
I have not previously taught this learning segment to the students/class.
The video clips submitted are unedited (continuous) and show me teaching the
student
s/class profiled in the evidence submitted.
The student work included in the documentation is that of my students, completed
during t
he learning segment documented in this assessment.
I am author of the commentaries and other written responses to prompts in this
assessm
ent.
Appropriate citations have been made for all materials in the assessment whose
sourc
es are from published text, the Internet, or other educators.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
39 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies
Context for Learning Information
Use the Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Context for Learning Information to supply
information about your school/classroom context.
About the School Where You Are Teaching
1. In what type of school do you teach? (Type an “X” next to the appropriate
description; if “other” applies, provide a brief description.)
Elementary school (K6):
Middle school (68):
K–8:
7–9:
Other (please describe):
2. Where is the school where you are teaching located? (Type an “X” next to the
appropriat
e description.)
10
City:
Suburb:
Town:
Rural:
3. List any special features of your school or classroom setting (e.g., charter, co-
teaching, themed magnet, remedial course, honors course) that will affect your
teaching in this learning segment.
4. Describe any district, school, or cooperating teacher requirements or expectations
that mi
ght affect your planning or delivery of instruction, such as required curricula,
pacing plan, use of specific instructional strategies, interdisciplinary teaming, or
standardized tests.
10
If you need guidance when making a selection, reference the NCES locale category definitions
(https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/definitions.asp) or consult with your placement school administrator.
About the Class Featured in this Learning Segment
1. What is the name of this course?
2. What is the length of the course? (Type an “X” next to the appropriate description; if
“other” applies, provide a brief description.)
One semester:
One year:
Other (please describe):
3. What is the class schedule (e.g., 50 minutes every day, 90 minutes every other
day)?
4. Is there any ability grouping or tracking in history/social studies? If so, please
desc
ribe how it affects your class.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
40 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____
______ _____
5. Identify any textbook or instructional program you primarily use for history/social
studies instruction. If a textbook, please provide the title, publisher, and date of
publication.
6. List other resources (e.g., electronic whiteboard, resource library in classroom, online
resourc
es) you use for history/social studies instruction in this class.
About the Young Adolescents in the Class Featured in this
Learning Segment
1. Grade level:
Age range of students:
2. Number of
student
s in the class:
males: females:
3. Complete the charts below to summarize required or needed supports,
accommodations, or modifications for your students that will affect your instruction in
this learning segment. As needed, consult with your cooperating teacher to complete
the charts. Some rows have been completed in italics as examples. Use as many
rows as you need.
Consider the variety of young adolescent learners in your class who may
requi
re different strategies/supports or accommodations/modifications to
instruction or assessment. For example, students
With Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) or 504 plans
With specific language needs
Needing greater challenge or support
Who struggle with reading
Who are underperforming students or have gaps in academic
knowledge
For Assessment Task 3, you will choose work samples from 3 focus students.
At l
east one of these students must have a specified learning need. Note:
California candidates must include one focus student who is an English
language learner.
11
11
California candidatesIf you do not have any English language learners, select a student who is challenged by academic
English.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
41 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Students with IEPs/504 Plans
IEPs/504 Plans:
Cl
assifications/Needs
Number of
Students
Supports, Accommodations,
Modifications, Pertinent IEP Goals
Example: Learning disability 2 Close monitoring, copy of PowerPoint
notes and follow up
Students with Specific Language Needs
Language Needs Number of
Students
Supports, Accommodations,
Modifications
Example: English language
learners with only a few
words of English
2 Pre-teach key words and phrases
through examples and graphic
organizers (e.g., word cluster,
manipulatives, visuals)
Have students use pre-taught key words
and graphic organizers to
complete sentence starters
Example: Students who
speak a variety of English
other than that used in
textbooks
5 Make connections between the language
students bring and the language used in
the textbook
Students with Other Learning Needs
Other Learning Needs Number of
Students
Supports, Accommodations,
Modifications
Example: Struggling readers 5 Provide oral explanations for directions,
extended time, and sentence frames to
support written responses
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
42 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Evidence Chart
Your evidence must be submitted to the electronic portfolio management system used by your teacher preparation program. Your
submission must conform to the artifact and commentary specifications for each task. This section provides instructions for all
evidence types as well as a description of supported file types for evidence submission, number of files, response lengths, and
other information regarding format specifications. Note that your evidence cannot contain hyperlinked content. Any web content
you wish to include as part of your evidence must be submitted as a document file, which must conform to the file format and
response length requirements. If you have materials that must be translated into English as per the
edTPA Submission
Requir
ements, those translations should be added to the original materials as part of the same file or, if applicable, to the end of
the com
mentary template. There is no page limit for required translations into English.
Planning Task 1: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications
What to
Submit
Supported File
Types
Number of Files
Response
Length
Additional Information
Min Max
Part A: Context for
Learning
Information
(template provided)
.doc; .docx; .odt; .pdf 1 1
No more than
4 pages, i
ncluding
prompts
Use Arial 11-point type.
Single space with 1" margins on all sides.
Part B: Lesson
Plans for Learning
Segment
.doc; .docx; .odt; .pdf 1 1
No more than 4
pages pe
r lesson
Submit 35 lesson plans in 1 file.
Within the file, label each lesson plan (Lesson 1, Lesson 2, etc.).
All rationale or explanation for plans should be written in the
Planning Commentary and removed from lesson plans.
Part C:
Instructi
onal
Materials
.doc; .docx; .odt; .pdf 1 1
No more than
5 pages of KEY
i
nstructional materials
per lesson plan
Submit all materials in 1 file.
Within the file, label materials by corresponding lesson (Lesson 1
Instructio
nal Materials, Lesson 2 Instructional Materials, etc.).
Order materials as they are used in the learning segment.
Part D:
Assessments
.d
oc; .docx; .odt; .pdf 1 1
No limit Submit assessments in 1 file.
Within the file, label assessments by corresponding lesson
(Lesson 1 A
ssessments, Lesson 2 Assessments, etc.).
Order assessments as they are used in the learning segment.
Part E: Planning
Commentary
(templ
ate provided)
.doc; .docx; .odt; .pdf 1 1
No more than
9 pages of
commen
tary,
including prompts
Use Arial 11-point type.
Single space with 1" margins on all sides.
Respond to prompts before teaching the learning segment.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
43 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Instruction Task 2: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications
What to
Submit
Supported File
Types
Number of Files
Response
Length
Additional Information
Min Max
Part A: Video
Clips
12
flv, asf, qt, mov, mpg,
mpeg, avi, wmv, mp4,
m4v
2 2
No more than
20 minutes total
running time (but not
less than 3 minutes)
Before you record your video, obtain permission from the
parents/guardians of your students and from adults who appear in
the video.
Refer to Instruction Task 2
, What do I Need to do? for video clip
content and requirements.
When naming each clip file, include the number of the lesson
shown
in the video clip.
Part B: Instruction
Commentary
(template
provided)
.doc; .docx; .odt; .pdf 1 1
No more than
6 pages of
commentary,
including prompts
If needed, no more
than 2
additional
pages of supporting
documentation
Use Arial 11-point type.
Single space with 1" margins on all sides.
IMPORTANT:
Insert documentation at the end of the commentary file if
you or the students are using graphics, texts, or images that
are not clearly visible in the video
you chose to submit a transcript for occasionally inaudible
porti
ons of the video
If submitting documentation, include the video clip number, lesson
number
, and explanatory text (e.g., “Clip 1, lesson 2, text from a
whiteboard that is not visible in the video,” “Clip 2, lesson 4,
transcription of a student response that is inaudible”).
12
Video file size requirements: The target file size is 200300 MB or less. The Pearson ePortfolio System file size limit is 500 MB. Please note that each integrated platform
provider portfolio system may have additional constraints or requirements regarding video formats and file sizes. You may need to use video tools to compress or transcode your
video into smaller file sizes to facilitate uploading of the video. Refer to Recommended Video Formats and Settings on www.edtpa.com
for the current requirements.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
(Continued on next page)
44 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Assessment Task 3: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications
What to
Submit
Supported File
Types
Number of Files
Response
Length
Additional Information
Min Max
Part A: Student
Work Samples
13
For written work
samples: .doc; .docx;
.odt; .pdf
For audio work
samples: flv, asf,
wmv, qt, mov, mpg,
avi, mp3, wav, mp4,
wma
For video work
sample
s: flv, asf, qt,
mov, mpg, mpeg, avi,
wmv, mp4, m4v
3 3
No page limit for
wri
tten work samples
No more than 5
minutes
per focus
student for video or
audio student work
samples
Use correction fluid, tape, or a felt-tip marker to mask or remove
student
s’ names, your name, and the name of the school
before copying/scanning any work samples. If your students’
writing is illegible, write a transcription directly on the work sample.
On each work sample, indicate the student number (Student 1
Work Sa
mple, Student 2 Work Sample, or Student 3 Work
Sample). If more than one focus student appears in a video or
audio work sample, upload the same work sample separately for
each focus student who is seen/heard and label appropriately.
Describe how to recognize each of the focus students in the clip
and provide the label associated with the clip in prompt 1d of the
Assessment Commentary.
When naming each work sample file, include the student number.
If you submit a student work sample or feedback as a video or
aud
io clip and comments made by you or your focus student(s)
cannot be clearly heard, do one of the following: 1) attach a
transcription of the inaudible comments (no more than 2
additional pages) to the end of the Assessment Commentary; 2)
embed quotes with time-stamp references in the commentary
response; or 3) insert captions in the video (captions for this
purpose will be considered permissible editing).
13
Video file size requirements: The target file size is 200300 MB or less. The Pearson ePortfolio System file size limit is 500 MB. Please note that each integrated platform
provider portfolio system may have additional constraints or requirements regarding video formats and file sizes. You may need to use video tools to compress or transcode your
video into smaller file sizes to facilitate uploading of the video. Refer to Recommended Video Formats and Settings on www.edtpa.com
for the current requirements.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Assessment Task 3: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications (continued)
What to
Submit
Supported File
Types
Number of Files
Response
Length
Additional Information
Min Max
(Continued on next page)
45 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Part B: Evidence
of Feedback
14
And, if included,
video evidence of
academic
language use
For written feedback
not written on the
w
ork samples: .doc;
.docx; .odt; .pdf
For audio feedback:
flv, asf, wmv, qt, mov,
mpg, avi, mp3, wav,
mp4, wma
For video clips
(feedback and/or
language use): flv,
asf, qt, mov, mpg,
mpeg, avi, wmv, mp4,
m4v
0 4
No page limit for
written feedback
No more than 3
minutes per focus
student fo
r video or
audio feedback
No more than 5
minutes for vide
o
evidence of student
language use
Document the location of your evidence of feedback in the
Assessment Commentary.
If feedback is not included as part of the student work samples or
recorded on th
e video clip(s) from Instruction Task 2, submit only 1
file for each focus studenta document, video file, OR audio file
and label the file with the corresponding student number (Student 1
Feedback, Student 2 Feedback, or Student 3 Feedback).
If more than one focus student appears in a video or audio clip of
feedback, upload t
he same clip separately for each focus student
who is seen/heard and label appropriately.
When naming each feedback file, include the student number.
If you submit a student work sample or feedback as a video or
audio clip and comments made by you or your focus student(s)
cannot be clearly heard, do one of the following: 1) attach a
transcription of the inaudible comments (no more than 2
additional pages) to the end of the Assessment Commentary; 2)
embed quotes with time-stamp references in the commentary
response; or 3) insert captions in the video (captions for this
purpose will be considered permissible editing).
For Academic Language If you choose to submit a video clip of
student language use, it should be no more than 5 minutes. You
may identify a portion of a clip provided for Instruction Task 2 or
submit an entirely new clip.
14
Video file size requirements: The target file size is 200300 MB or less. The Pearson ePortfolio System file size limit is 500 MB. Please note that each integrated platform
provider portfolio system may have additional constraints or requirements regarding video formats and file sizes. You may need to use video tools to compress or transcode your
video into smaller file sizes to facilitate uploading of the video. Refer to Recommended Video Formats and Settings on www.edtpa.com
for the current requirements.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
Assessment Task 3: Artifacts and Commentary Specifications (continued)
What to
Submit
Supported File
Types
Number of Files
Response
Length
Additional Information
Min Max
46 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Part C:
Assessment
Commentary
(template
provi
ded)
.doc; .docx; .odt; .p
df 1 1 No more than 10
pages of commentary,
including prompts
Plus
no more than
5 additional
pages for the
chosen
assessment
if necessary,
no more than
2 additional
total pages of
transcription of
video/audio
evidence for a
work sample
and feedback,
and/or video
evidence of
language use
Use Arial 11-point type.
Single space with 1" margins on all sides.
IMPORTANT: Insert a copy of the chosen assessment, including
directions/prompts provided to students.
Part D: Evaluation
Criteria
.doc; .docx; .odt; .pdf 1 1 No limit
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
47 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies
Glossary
Source citations for glossary entries are provided as footnotes in this section.
academic language: Oral and written language used for academic purposes. Academic
language is the means by which students develop and express content understandings.
Academic language represents the language of the discipline that students need to learn
and use to participate and engage in the content area in meaningful ways. There are
language demands that teachers need to consider as they plan to support student learning
of content. These language demands include language functions, vocabulary,
discourse, and syntax.
language demands:
15
Specific ways that academic language (vocabulary/symbols,
functions, discourse, syntax) is used by students to participate in learning tasks
through reading, writing, listening, and/or speaking to demonstrate their disciplinary
understanding.
language functions: The content and language focus of the learning task
represented by the active verbs within the learning outcomes. Common language
functions in history/social studies include interpreting maps, graphs, and data
tables; evaluating and interpreting an author/presenter/historian’s purpose and
message; examining evidence an author/presenter/historian uses to support claims;
analyzing arguments in favor of a perspective; writing/presenting persuasive
arguments; analyzing and/or describing causes of historical, economic,
geographic, and political events; and defending argument with evidence.
vocabulary: Includes words and phrases that are used within disciplines, including:
(1) wor
ds and phrases with subject-specific meanings that differ from meanings used
in everyday life (e.g., table); (2) general academic vocabulary used across disciplines
(e.g., compare, analyze, evaluate); and (3) subject-specific words defined for use in
the discipline.
16
discourse: Discourse includes the structures of written and oral language, as well as
how members of the discipline talk, write, and participate in knowledge construction.
Discipline-specific discourse has distinctive features or ways of structuring oral or
written language (text structures) that provide useful ways for the content to be
communicated.
17
In history/social studies, language features include expository,
narrative, journalistic, maps, and other graphic print materials; presentations of data
in text, charts, and graphs; and video and live presentations. Discourse structures
15
O'Hara, S., Pritchard, R., & Zwiers, J. (2012). Identifying academic language demands in support of the common core
standards. ASCD Express, 7(17). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ascd-expres
s/vol7/717-ohara.aspx
16
Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2012). Language demands and opportunities in relation to next generation science
standards for ELLs. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/academic-papers/
03-
Quinn%20Lee%20Valdes%20Language%20and%20Opportunities%20in%20Science%20FINAL.pdf
17
Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2012). Language demands and opportunities in relation to next generation science
standards for ELLs. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/academic-papers/
03-
Quinn%20Lee%20Valdes%20Language%20and%20Opportunities%20in%20Science%20FINAL.pdf
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
48 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
_____________ ____________ ____________
_______________
can be at the sentence, paragraph, or symbolic level. If the function is to develop a
document-based argument, then appropriate language features could include written
essays with specified formats and pattern sentences such as The two main causes
of were and . For example, the
(author of) (document) stated that ” (citation).
syntax: The set of conventions for organizing symbols, words, and phrases together
into structures (e.
g., sentences, graphs, tables).
18
language supports: The scaffolds, representations, and pedagogical strategies
teachers provide to help learners understand, use, and practice the concepts and
language they need to learn within disciplines (Santos, Darling-Hammond, Cheuk,
2012).
19
The language supports planned within the lessons in edTPA should directly
support learners to understand and use identified language demands
(vocabulary/symbols, language function, and discourse or syntax) to deepen content
understandings.
aligned: Consistently addressing the same/similar learning outcomes for students.
analysis: Detailed examination of the elements or structure of something; the process of
separating something into its constituent elements.
20
arguments: Use evidence to support
claims about a historical event, topic/issue, or social
studies phenomenon. Evidence comes from analysis and/or interpretation of history/social
studies sources.
artifacts: Authentic work completed by you and your students. Artifacts include lesson
plans, copies of instructional and assessment materials, video clips of your teaching, and
student work samples. Artifacts are submitted as part of your evidence.
assessment (formal and informal): “[R]efer[s] to all those activities undertaken by
teachers and by their students . . . that provide information to be used as feedback to modify
teaching and learning activities.”
21
Assessments provide evidence of students’ prior
knowledge, thinking, or learning in order to evaluate what students understand and how they
are thinking. Informal assessments may include, for example, student questions and
responses during instruction and teacher observations of students as they work or perform.
Formal assessments may include, for example, quizzes, homework assignments, journals,
projects, and performance tasks.
assets (knowledge of students):
personal: Refers to specific background information that young adolescents bring to
the learning environment. Students may bring interests, knowledge, everyday
experiences, family backgrounds, and so on, which a teacher can draw upon to
support learning.
18
Zwiers, J. (2008). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19
Santos, M., Darling-Hammond, L., & Cheuk, T. (2012). Teacher development to support English language learners in the
context of common core state standards. Stanford University Understanding Language. Available at
http://ell.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/academic-papers/10-Santos%20LDH%20Teacher%20Development%20FINAL.pdf
20
Analysis. (n.d.) In Oxford Dictionaries Online. Retrieved from
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/analysis.
21
Black, P., &
Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,
80(2), 139148.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
49 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
cultural: Refers to the cultural backgrounds and practices that young adolescents
bring to the learning environment, such as traditions, languages and dialects,
worldviews, literature, art, and so on, that a teacher can draw upon to support
learning.
community: Refers to common backgrounds and experiences that young
adolescents bring from the community where they live, such as resources, local
landmarks, community events and practices, and so on, that a teacher can draw
upon to support learning.
developmental: Refers to specific background information about cognitive, physical,
social, and emotional development that a teacher can draw upon to support student
learning.
central focus: A description of the important understandings and core concepts that you
want students to develop within the learning segment. The central focus should go beyond a
list of facts and skills, align with content standards and learning objectives, and address the
subject-specific components in the learning segment. For example, a central focus for a
Middle Childhood History/Social Studies learning segment might be “the effects of British
colonial rule in India” or “the role of political parties in the electoral process.” The learning
segment would focus on facts, concepts, analyses, and interpretations of sources to build
and support arguments about historical events, a topic/theme, or a social studies
phenomenon.
cognitive development: Refers to the changes and advancement that occur in intellectual
development during adolescence, such as the shift from concrete operational thinking to
formal abstract thinking.
commentary: Submitted as part of each task and, along with artifacts, make up your
evidence. The commentaries should be written to explain the rationale behind your teaching
decisions and to analyze and reflect on what you have learned about your teaching practice
and your students’ learning.
concepts: The categories we use to cluster information. They organize specific information
under one label (e.g., shelter, family, community, democracy, region). Concepts summarize
and categorize objects. The difficulty of learning a concept depends on the number of
characteristics, the abstractness or concreteness, and the reasoning that connects the
characteristics.
conclusion: A final decision or judgment: an opinion or decision that is formed after a
period of thought or research.
22
engaging students in learning: Using instructional and motivational strategies that
promote students’ active involvement in learning tasks that increase their knowledge, skills,
and abilities related to specific learning objectives. Engagement in learning contrasts with
student participation in learning tasks that are not well-designed and/or implemented and do
not increase student learning.
evaluation criteria: Performance indicators or dimensions that are used to assess evidence
of student learning. They indicate the qualities by which levels of performance can be
22
Conclusion. (n.d.) In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/conclusion.
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
50 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
differentiated and that anchor judgments about the learner’s degree of success on an
assessment. Evaluation criteria can be represented in various ways, such as a rubric, a
point system for different levels of performance, or rules for awarding full versus partial
credit. Evaluation criteria may examine correctness/accuracy, cognitive complexity,
sophistication or elaboration of responses, or quality of explanations.
evidence: Evidence for edTPA co
nsists of artifacts that document how you planned and
implemented instruction AND commentaries that explain your plans and what is seen in the
videorecording(s) or examine what you learned about your teaching practice and your
students’ learning. Evidence should demonstrate your ability to design lesson plans with
instructional supports that deepen student learning, use knowledge of your students to
inform instruction, foster a positive learning environment that promotes student learning,
monitor and assess student progress toward learning objectives, and analyze your teaching
effectiveness. Your evidence must be submitted electronically using the electronic portfolio
management system used by your teacher preparation program.
facts: Knowledge or inform
ation based on real occurrences: a. something demonstrated to
exist or known to have existed; b. a real occurrence, an event; c. something believed to be
true or real.
inquiry: Seeking information by questioning and/or through investigation.While
questioning and searching for answers are extremely important parts of inquiry, effectively
generating knowledge from this questioning and searching is greatly aided by a conceptual
context for learning. Just as students should not be focused only on content as the ultimate
outcome of learning, neither should they be asking questions and searching for answers
about minutiae. . . . Inquiry in education should be about a greater understanding of the
world in which they live, learn, communicate, and work
.”
23
integrative: The Association for Middle Level Education (AMLE) encourages middle grades
teachers to design curriculum and select materials that are integrative, challenging, and
grounded in the ideas, interests, and experiences of all young adolescents. In an integrative
curriculum, a problem or issue, often initiated by the learners, is the driving force for
organizing the curriculum.
interdisciplinary: An interdisciplinary curriculum makes connections across several
disciplines through a theme that crosses curricular lines. The learning experiences require
that knowledge from several disciplines be utilized to explore the concepts and skills of the
curriculum.
interpret: “To give or provide the meaning of; explain; explicate; elucidate” orto
understand in a particular way.
24
learning environment: The designed physical and emotional context, established and
maintained throughout the learning segment to support a positive and productive learning
experience for students.
learning objectives: Student learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or
learning segment.
23
Educational Broadcasting Corporation. (2004). What is inquiry-based learning? Concept to Classroom: A Series of
Workshops. Retrieved from http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/inquiry/index.html.
24
Interpret. (n.d.) In Dictionary.com. Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/interpret
edTPA Middle Childhood History/Social Studies Assessment Handbook
51 of 51
Copyright © 2019 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
All rights reserved.
learning segment: A set of 35 lessons that build one upon another toward a central focus,
with a clearly defined beginning and end.
learning task: Includes activities, discussions, or other modes of participation that engage
students to develop, practice, and apply skills and knowledge related to a specific learning
goal. Learning tasks may be scaffolded to connect prior knowledge to new knowledge and
often include formative assessment.
patterns of learning: Incl
udes both quantitative and qualitative patterns (or consistencies)
for different groups of students or individuals. Quantitative patterns indicate in a numerical
way the information understood from the assessment (e.g., 10 out of 15 students or 20% of
the students). Qualitative patterns include descriptions of understandings,
misunderstandings, and/or partial understandings that could explain the quantitative
patterns (e.g., “given that most students were able to . . . it seems that they understand”).
physical development: Refers to the growth and development of skeletal, structural, and
muscular systems that includes the changes brought about by puberty.
planned supports: Instructional strategies, learning tasks and materials, and other
resources deliberately designed to facilitate student learning of the central focus.
prior academic learning and prerequisite skills: Includes students’ content knowledge
and skills as well as academic experiences developed prior to the learning segment.
rapport: A close and harmonious relationship in which the people or groups understand
each other’s feelings or ideas and communicate well with each other.
respect: A positive feeling of esteem or deference for a person and specific actions and
conduct representative of that esteem. Respect can be a specific feeling of regard for the
actual qualities of the one respected. It can also be conduct in accord with a specific ethic of
respect. Rude conduct is usually considered to indicate a lack of respect, disrespect,
whereas actions that honor somebody or something indicate respect. Note that respectful
actions and conduct are culturally defined and may be context dependent.
rubrics: Subject-specific evaluation criteria used to score your performance on edTPA.
These rubrics are included in the handbook following the directions for each task. The
descriptors in the five-level rubrics address a wide range of performance, beginning with the
knowledge and skills of a novice not ready to teach (Level 1) and extending to the advanced
practices of a highly accomplished beginner (Level 5).
social and emotional development: Refers to the ways in which adolescents develop
understandings of self and others. Milestones at various levels of development include
identity formation, self-awareness/self-concept, pro-social behavior, peer relationships,
social responsibility, and moral reasoning.
social studies phenomenon: Observable occurrence, circumstance, or behavior within the
discipline of history/social studies (e.g., civil war, racism, revolution, civic engagement,
rationality, crime, peace, poverty).
variety of young adolescent learners: Students in your class who may require different
strategies or support. These young adolescents include but are not limited to students with
IEPs or 504 plans, English language learners, struggling readers, underperforming students
or those with gaps in academic knowledge, and/or gifted students.