WENCK File #1305-0026
May 4, 2017
Prepared by:
WENCK Associates, Inc.
1800 Pioneer Creek Center
Maple Plain, MN 55359
Phone: 763-479-4200
Fax: 763-479-4242
Environmental Resources
14955 Galaxie Avenue
Apple Valley, Minnesota
55125
Prepared for:
Dakota County
May/2017
i
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 BACKGROUND AND SCOPE .......................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Purpose and Background ...................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Scope ................................................................................................ 3-2
4.0 RESEARCH AND INVENTORY FINDINGS ...................................................... 4-4
4.1 Summary of Findings ........................................................................... 4-4
4.2 City Mechanisms Inventory ................................................................. 4-10
4.2.1 Management Requirements: Solid waste, Recycling, and Organics .. 4-
10
4.2.2 Hauler Requirements: Solid waste, Recycling, and Organics ....... 4-11
4.2.3 Building Code Requirements: Recycling Space .......................... 4-13
4.2.4 Zoning Requirements: Recycling Space .................................... 4-15
4.2.5 Enforcement ......................................................................... 4-17
4.3 Other Cities Comparison .................................................................... 4-18
5.0 IDENTIFIED BARRIERS ............................................................................... 5-1
5.1 Commercial Recycling Barriers .............................................................. 5-1
5.1.1 Logistical Barriers .................................................................... 5-1
5.1.2 Policy Barriers ......................................................................... 5-4
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................... 6-1
6.1 Summary of Findings and Conclusions ................................................... 6-1
6.1.1 Findings ................................................................................. 6-1
6.1.2 Conclusions ............................................................................ 6-1
6.2 Recommendations ............................................................................... 6-2
6.2.1 Partner with Cities ................................................................... 6-2
6.2.2 Multi-unit Dwelling Ordinance ................................................... 6-3
6.2.3 Registration and Information Reporting ...................................... 6-5
6.2.4 Commercial Recycling Ordinance ............................................... 6-6
6.2.5 County Funding ....................................................................... 6-8
6.3 Phased Approach ................................................................................ 6-8
6.4 Other Considerations ......................................................................... 6-10
7.0 SIGNATURE PAGE ..................................................................................... 7-11
May/2017
ii
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Table of Contents (Cont.)
TABLES
Table 4.1. Summary of city code recycling requirements. ............................................. 4-6
Table 4.2. Summary of city recycling enclosure minimum requirements. ........................ 4-9
Table 4.3. City solid waste, recycling, and organics requirements. ............................... 4-11
Table 4.4. City solid waste, recycling, and organics requirements. ............................... 4-12
Table 4.5. Projected permit and site plan review costs. .............................................. 4-15
Table 4.6. Zoning requirements for enclosure space. ................................................. 4-16
Table 5.1. Breakdown of commercial entities with a NAICS code between 42-81. ............ 5-2
Table 5.2. Estimated costs to add recycling enclosures at 10% of buildings occupied by
businesses with NAICS codes between 42-81 and that generate 4 cubic yards or
more of solid waste per week. ........................................................................ 5-2
Table 6.2. Prioritization for implementation at each proposed phase. ............................. 6-9
FIGURES
Figure 4.1. State regulations for building permit application review. ............................ 4-14
Figure 6.1. Phased approach to implementation of recommendations. ........................... 6-8
APPENDICES
A Interview Summaries
B City Hauler License Forms
C City Building Permit Forms
D Other Cities Comparison
May/2017
1-1
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
1.0 Executive Summary
Under Minn. Stat. § 473.823, subd. 6, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) may
only issue a certificate of need (CON) for landfills if there are no reasonable and prudent
alternatives. The MPCA holds the position that no new CONs will be issued unless resource
recovery facilities are operating at full capacity. Currently, resource recovery facilities are
not operating at full capacity, and are unlikely to operate at full capacity in the future due to
air permit restrictions. Therefore, Dakota County remains, and is likely to remain, the only
metro county with municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills.
Extending the life of landfills in Dakota County (County) is a significant priority for several
reasons. Having metro county landfills maintains short driving distances, which keeps
disposal costs low, reduces vehicle emissions, and limits the miles of road wear and tear.
Dakota County also receives host fees from landfills, which support many department
programs. Landfills also create jobs and generate energy. Carefully phased approaches to
landfill diversion prolongs the many benefits these facilities offer to Dakota County.
Additionally, under Minn. Stat. § 115A.551, sub. 2(a), Dakota County is required to meet a
75% by weight diversion rate by 2030. In 2016, Dakota County’s recycling rate decreased
from 49% to 48%. If yard waste is removed from that percentage, the County currently has
a 30% recycling rate, which is 5-23% lower than other metro counties and about 10% lower
than the metro area average. To reach 75% by 2030, the County will need to make
significant changes to its waste management strategies.
The County priorities have traditionally focused primarily on single-family residential
recycling programs. However, the County recognizes that single-family recycling alone will
never reach a 75% diversion goal. In response to increased recycling goals, the County is
expanding efforts to address commercial recycling and organics collection. The State has
demonstrated support for this position, and in 2016, Minn. Stat. § 115A.151 required
commercial buildings in North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) sectors 42-
81 recycle a minimum of three materials.
In 2016, as a first step to improve commercial recycling, the County implemented a
Business Recycling Incentive Program. The program provides technical assistance and up to
$10,000 for businesses subject to the State commercial recycling mandate. Funds may be
used to implement recycling and organics diversion initiatives, including up to $7,500 for
waste enclosure improvements.
To enhance commercial recycling program development, which includes multi-unit
dwellings, the County initiated a research and inventory project to evaluate potential
commercial recycling barriers in Dakota County cities with populations over 10,000. These
cities include Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Farmington, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights,
Lakeville, Mendota Heights, Rosemount, South St. Paul, and West St. Paul. Results revealed
the following:
City-level zoning codes regarding recycling enclosures are a substantial barrier.
Wenck recommends the County work with city policy makers to address the high
cost associated with recycling enclosure design specifications, and collaborate to
determine reasonable minimum design requirements. The County should also
May/2017
1-2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
collaborate with cities to secure temporary exemptions from enclosure requirements,
and reduce setback and parking space barriers.
To increase residential access to recycling, and enhance diversion rates, Wenck
recommends the County adopt an ordinance requiring that any owner or manager of
multi-unit dwelling or senior living associations must contract for recycling services,
and provide model language to cities.
The County does not collect data relative to how much solid waste individual
commercial entities generate and which entities currently recycle. Without such
information, the County is not able satisfactorily prioritize implementation of a
commercial mandate based on generator volume. Wenck recommends the County
consider implementing a registration and information reporting compliance system,
similar to information reported by hazardous waste generators.
Wenck recommends the County adopt a commercial recycling ordinance consistent
with Minnesota Statute § 115A.151, that focusses on a tiered, generation based
implementation strategy.
The County acknowledges that a successful regulatory program includes:
identification of the regulated community, a required action, enforcement/compliance
system, and funding to support implementation and financial burdens on the
regulated community. Wenck recommends the County prioritize its Business
Recycling Incentive Program funds to focus on multi-unit dwellings, stand-alone
commercial buildings, and high volume generators in geographic locations with low
enclosure barriers.
Based on identified expenses associated with enclosure development, Wenck
recommends the County expand or supplement its Business Recycling Incentive
Program funding through Commercial Strategies recommended in the 2016 SERA
Report, such as tipping fees, taxes, or pay as you throw programs.
May/2017
2-1
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
2.0 Introduction
Wenck Associates, Inc. (Wenck) was authorized by Dakota County (County), to conduct a
city policy inventory and provide prioritized strategies relative to commercial solid waste,
recycling, and organics management. Dakota County cities with populations over 10,000
were evaluated in the scope of this work, which includes: Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan,
Farmington, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Mendota Heights, Rosemount, South
St. Paul, and West St. Paul. The following cities are not included in the project: Lilydale,
Mendota, and Sunfish Lake.
The overall goal of this project was to develop a comprehensive inventory of city codes
related to:
commercial recycling, hauler collection, licensing, applications, and data reporting;
building permits/applications, plan review, and waste/recycling space specifications;
zoning waste enclosure specifications and set-backs; and,
other policies and practices that support these city codes.
Wenck conducted a comprehensive review of all city waste and recycling, building, and
zoning codes, the statutory authorities for such regulations, and completed a series of
interviews with key city staff. The following report summarizes these research findings and
provides options for prioritized strategies to increase commercial recycling in Dakota
County.
Conclusions and recommendations contained in this report have been made to assist Dakota
County in evaluating commercial solid waste, recycling, and organics program development
and master planning. Completed research and inventory activities have led to the following
recommendations:
Work with city policy makers to address the high cost associated with recycling
enclosure design specifications, and collaborate to determine reasonable minimum
design requirements.
Collaborate with cities to secure temporary exemptions from enclosure requirements
at businesses that want to add recycling space. This may be accomplished by
amending city codes to provide such exemptions.
Partner with cities to reduce setback and parking space barriers on a site-by-site
basis.
Adopt a County ordinance requiring that all owners/operators of multi-unit dwelling
and senior living associations must contract for recycling services, and provide model
language to cities.
Establish a registration and waste generation information reporting system for
businesses with NAICS 42-81. Work with city fire departments to obtain updated
building and business contact information.
Adopt a County commercial recycling ordinance consistent with Minnesota Statute
§ 115A.151, that focusses on a tiered, generation based implementation strategy.
May/2017
2-2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Prioritize Business Recycling Incentive Program funds to focus on multi-unit
dwellings, stand-alone commercial buildings, and high volume generators in
geographic locations with low enclosure barriers.
Expand Business Recycling Incentive Program funding through Commercial
Strategies recommended in the 2016 SERA Report, such as tipping fees, taxes, or
pay as you throw programs.
May/2017
3-1
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
3.0 Background and Scope
3.1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
Statutory Requirements
Under Minnesota Statute Section 115A.551, sub. 2(a), metropolitan counties are required to
meet a 75% by weight diversion rate by 2030. The legislature also tasks counties with
additional responsibilities that include master planning, annual reporting, and program
development, which are activities subject to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA or
Agency) approval.
1
Master planning is a statutorily mandated process required at the
regional (MPCA) and local (county) level.
The MPCA publishes a regional master plan that governs waste and recycling goals and
policies in the metropolitan area.
2
County master plans must be consistent with the regional
plan and must receive Agency approval. After Agency approval, the county plan governs
waste and recycling within the county’s geographic jurisdiction.
3
Dakota County (County) is currently in the master planning process. Part of the statutory
requirement for county master plans includes describing existing and proposed “municipal
ordinances and license and permit requirements relating to solid waste management…and
existing and proposed regulation and enforcement procedures.”
4
This requirement is
reflected in the MPCA regional master plan.
For purposes of this research, commercial includes multi-unit dwellings over four units.
MPCA Master Plan Policy
The MPCA Commissioner adopted the Metropolitan Solid Waste Policy Plan on April 6, 2017.
The Plan includes options for strategies specific to county relationships with municipalities:
“Counties should work with cities to modify codes that do not allow enough flexibility for
recycling infrastructure. By 2022, all cities in the [Twin Cities Metro Area] TCMA must
update city ordinances to be consistent with this requirement.” To implement, counties
may:
Require cities to update codes to receive recycling funding.
Provide technical assistance to cities updating their ordinances.
Provide model code language for enclosure requirements.
Work with developers and city planning staff to increase awareness of recycling space
needs.
5
Dakota County City Code Inventory
Dakota County has traditionally carried out its responsibility to collaborate with
municipalities through funding, and partnerships like the household hazardous waste (HHW)
collections. The County allocates funding to cities through annually renewed Joint Powers
Agreements (JPAs). Funds may be used to implement landfill abatement priorities consistent
1
Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.46, 551, 552, 557.
2
Minn. Stat. § 473.149.
3
Minn. Stat. § 115A.46, subd. 5.
4
Minn. Stat. § 115A.46, subd. 2(h).
5
MPCA Policy Plan p. 23 (2017).
May/2017
3-2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
with County priorities. County priorities for cities have focused primarily on residential
recycling programs. However, the County recognizes that residential recycling is not enough
to reach a 75% diversion goal. In response, the County is expanding its focus to commercial
recycling, and organics collection.
With emphasis on commercial recycling and organics recovery, and in light of the MPCA
Policy Plan requirement to assist municipalities with code modification, the County
requested consulting services to research and inventory city policies addressing commercial
solid waste, recycling, and organics management.
6
The County will consider strategies and
recommendations resulting from this research to help satisfy its solid waste and recycling
management obligations.
3.2 SCOPE
The following scope of services was completed for this research inventory:
1. Attended a kick off meeting to review project goals and develop a final Work Plan.
2. Engaged staff (in administrative, planning, recycling and others, as necessary) from
Dakota County cities with populations over 10,000 to identify municipal mechanisms
that address mixed municipal solid waste management from commercial entities and
multiunit buildings located in their respective jurisdictions. The following Dakota
County cities were included:
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Farmington
Hastings
Inver Grove Heights
Lakeville
Mendota Heights
Rosemount
South St. Paul
West St. Paul
a. Created a written inventory and provided electronic copies of each city’s
mechanisms and requirements relative to:
Solid waste, recycling, and organics management;
Waste storage space/enclosures;
Hauler licensing, permits, and applications;
Business licensing;
Building permits and plan review;
Enforcement and/or inspections protocol pertaining to any of the above; and,
Other mechanisms, as identified through research efforts.
b. Reviewed existing Dakota County data on city ordinances, licensing programs,
and requirements related to multiunit buildings, residents, property owners, and
managers; verified that this information is complete as part of Task 2a; added
any additional information needed to complete the inventory described in Task
2b; and incorporated this information into the baseline data.
6
See RFP and Wenck Proposal.
May/2017
3-3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
3. Submitted a summary of findings report to the County with respect to city interview
information.
4. Researched and identified mechanisms used by 5 other cities in the state or nation of
similar size and characteristics of Dakota County cities that have demonstrated
effective diversion in the commercial/multiunit sectors. Cities researched include:
Alameda, California
Austin, Texas
Seattle, Washington
Minneapolis, Minnesota
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Provided diversion data for each mechanism, and recommendations for mechanisms
likely to be successful in Dakota County. Provided electronic documents used to
research mechanisms.
5. Developed and discussed a draft report with County staff summarizing the research
and analysis of the above tasks. The report identifies (1) opportunities for
consistency in city mechanisms, and (2) provides model language for proposed
mechanisms, including ordinances/codes, development/construction permits, and
business and hauler licensing considerations.
6. Facilitated meetings with County staff and provided project status updates.
7. Submitted a final report and presented findings to County staff.
May/2017
4-4
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
4.0 Research and Inventory Findings
4.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Wenck completed review of city codes and mechanisms related to waste and recycling, and
building and zoning codes. Wenck also completed city interviews, with the exception of
Hastings. City interview summaries are included as Appendix A. Completed research and
inventory activities revealed the following findings:
Findings
Findings associated with waste codes:
Not all residents in multi-unit buildings have the opportunity to recycle. County
Ordinance 110, Section 15.08(K), requires that haulers must “provide recycling
services and opportunities for their customers.” However, residents of apartment
buildings are typically not customers because they are not the contracting party.
Therefore, haulers are not directly required to offer or provide recycling services to
all residents unless they are customers. Generally, because the apartment owner or
manager contracts for waste services, and is the customer, residents only have the
opportunity to recycle if the owner or manager contracts for recycling. The County
does not require multi-unit dwelling owners or managers to provide recycling to
residents. About half of the cities require multi-unit dwelling managers to contract
for recycling, but lack sufficient funds and staff to implement a compliance system.
Interviewed staff from cities without multi-unit residential recycling opportunity
requirements supported considering code amendments that provide recycling
opportunities. Interviewed staff from cities with requirements also supported
considering code amendments.
Three cities require haulers to offer recycling to commercial businesses. Generally,
interviewed city staff supported considering code amendments that require haulers
to offer commercial recycling opportunities.
No city mandates commercial recycling, commercial services fee structures, or
commercial organics recycling or the opportunity for such. Cities are not apt to adopt
any commercial recycling mandates, but would follow any County ordinance.
All cities license haulers but the application forms are inconsistent. Generally, cities
would be willing to modify license forms for consistency.
Findings associated with building and zoning codes:
All cities review recycling space requirements for new buildings, but attention to this
point varies. Recycling space is not required for existing buildings.
Seven of the eleven cities require recycling bins be enclosed or screened, but design
specification standards vary. Permits are required for enclosure development in all
cities. Interviewed staff from cities with enclosure requirements are currently not
willing to change enclosure specifications, but supported providing an opportunity to
right-size waste containers. Staff expressed an interest to work with the County and
May/2017
4-5
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
provide businesses with temporary exemptions from enclosure requirements for
between 3-6 months.
Recycling space requirements at new buildings are incorporated into the permit
process. However, most buildings in Dakota County currently exist, and the cost to
add a recycling enclosure varies depending on design specifications. Based on
interview information the cost to add a new enclosure falls between $6,000-$50,000,
with a majority in the $10,000+ range due to enclosure material requirements.
Businesses that currently do not recycling, and are located in cities with stringent
enclosure requirementssuch as load-bearing roofsmay be disproportionately
affected by increased commercial recycling due to the cost of enclosure construction.
Fire inspectors appear to have the most comprehensive list of commercial buildings,
business establishments, and site contacts.
Waste and Recycling
Generally, waste and recycling codes have high variability among the Dakota County cities
examined. There is a wide range of code language relative to definitions, container
requirements, opportunity for recycling requirements, and hauler licensee responsibilities.
Specifically, codes related to multi-unit residential recycling opportunities are inconsistent or
do not exist.
Not all residents in multi-unit buildings have the opportunity to recycle. Four of eleven cities
do not require that residents in multi-unit buildings have the opportunity to recycle
(Mendota Heights, Rosemount, South St. Paul, West St. Paul). The other seven cities do
require that residents in multi-unit buildings have the opportunity to recycle, but
enforcement is not consistent. Only Burnsville claims to enforce this opportunity to recycle
requirement, but it is not clear what happens during property owner turnover.
County Ordinance 110, Section 15.08(K), requires that haulers must “provide recycling
services and opportunities for their customers.” However, residents of apartment buildings
are typically not customers because they are not the contracting party. Therefore, haulers
are not directly required to offer or provide recycling services to all residents unless they are
customers. Generally, because the apartment owner or manager contracts for waste
services, and is the customer, residents only have the opportunity to recycle if the owner or
manager contracts for recycling. The County does not require multi-unit dwelling owners or
managers to provide recycling to residents. About half of the cities require multi-unit
dwelling managers to contract for recycling, but lack sufficient capacity to implement a
compliance system.
Cities with multi-unit residential recycling codes require the housing association or
management entity, or the hauler provide recycling services. Only three cities require both
the management entity and the hauler to provide recycling opportunities (Burnsville, Eagan,
Farmington). See Table 4.1 Summary of city waste and recycling code requirements.
Interviewed staff from cities without management entity or hauler recycling opportunity
requirements supported considering city-level code amendments to require such
opportunities for multi-unit residential buildings.
Three cities require haulers to offer recycling services to commercial establishments (Eagan,
Farmington, Hastings). Generally, cities were open code amendments that require haulers
to offer commercial recycling opportunities.
May/2017
4-6
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Table 4.1. Summary of city code recycling requirements.
City
MUD
manager
required
to offer
recycling
Hauler
required to
offer
recycling
Commercial
recycling or
organics
mandate
City staff
willing to
adopt city-
level
mandate
City staff
willing to
adopt city-
level
opportunity
to recycle
Apple Valley
No
Yes- MUD
No
No
Yes
Burnsville
Yes
Yes- MUD
No
No
Yes
Eagan
Yes
Yes- All
No
No
Yes
Farmington
Yes
Yes- all, by
city contract
No
No
Yes
Hastings
No
Yes- All
No
unknown
unknown
Inver Grove
Heights
No
Yes- MUD
No
No
Yes
Lakeville
Yes
No
Yes- MUD only
No
Yes
Mendota
Heights
No
No
No
No
Yes
Rosemount
No
No
No
No
Yes
South St.
Paul
No
No
No
No
Yes
West St.
Paul
No
No
No
No
Yes
No city mandates commercial recycling, bin labels, commercial services fee structures, or
commercial organics recycling or the opportunity for such. Interviewed city staff expressed
that cities are not apt to adopt any city-level commercial recycling mandates, but would
follow any County ordinance that required commercial recycling.
All cities license haulers but the application forms are inconsistent. Generally, cities are
willing to modify license forms for consistency. It does not appear that a consistent hauler
license form will provide meaningful diversion, but would likely streamline licensing
efficiency.
Some cities require haulers to collect and submit data to the city. With the exception of
recycling event information, and cities that contract for waste and recycling services
(Farmington and Hastings), cities did not identify needs for hauler data.
Building and Zoning
Generally, building and zoning codes regulate waste, recycling, and organics enclosure
space. Minn. Stat. §§ 326B.133 and 462.357 govern building and zoning laws, and set forth
some basic requirements, but otherwise delegate authority to municipalities. Each
metropolitan city is required to adopt and administer the state building code. And, each city
may regulate land use through zoning ordinances.
Building code
In 2007, the state adopted a code to require identification of recycling space on all site
plans submitted for a building permit.
7
Building permits are required for all new or modified
7
Minn. R. § 1303.1500 (2007).
May/2017
4-7
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
structures, with certain exceptions including detached accessory structures less than 200
square feet, and fences less than seven (7) feet high
8
; however, many cities require permits
for these structures through zoning ordinances.
Overall, cities routinely evaluate recycling space requirements for new building permits.
Consistent with state law, each city requires a building permit application that includes a
site plan identifying recycling space. City interview information revealed that building permit
application forms do not specifically request recycling space specifications as this
requirement is imbedded in the site plan review process. Attention to review of recycling
space requirements varies among cities, but almost all cities reported comparing the
calculated recycling area to the state code requirements. Architects must also follow state
building codes, and therefore, recycling space is typically included in site plan submission.
The state code requires that designated recycling space must be “sufficient to contain all the
recyclable materials generated from the building,” or a minimum area determined by Minn.
R. § 1303.1500, subp. 5, Table 1-A. Where sufficient space is unknown at the time of
development, the minimum space standard is used. The recycling space must be located in
a place as convenient as the solid waste collection. Based on interview information,
sufficient area and convenient location are a challenge to determine during the building
permit phase because building occupants are not always known at the time of development.
Even if specific building uses were required, such uses could change with tenant turnover.
As such, most site plans default to the minimum space requirement.
Additionally, the state code requires recycling space for a singular building, not individual
tenants. Interview information revealed that multi-unit commercial site plans typically
include one combined waste and recycling space at a single designated location. However,
most cities generally confirmed that after occupancy, multi-unit buildings usually end up
with several un-enclosed dumpsters behind a building. As such, where multi-unit
commercial buildings are concerned, each unit may end up with a space conveniently
located, but such areas are not required to be shown on building permit plans, and may not
be enclosed. City staff prefer these bins be enclosed, but also acknowledge that multi-unit
commercial buildings present specific challenges. Interviewed staff from all cities generally
agreed that multi-unit commercial buildings should not be addressed at the first stage of
commercial recycling program implementation.
After the building official approves the site plan, and city council approves the development
project, there is a final building inspection. About half of the cities reported specifically
measuring recycling space during final inspection, but all cities confirm checking that a
collection area exists.
The state building code does not require permits for existing buildings and therefore does
not require submittal of a site plan identifying recycling space. No cities have adopted
building codes that require recycling space for existing buildings. Generally, zoning
ordinances address enclosures for existing buildings, including materials, size, and structural
design. Some cities use the same building permit application process for enclosures, and
others use designated zoning permit applications.
8
Minn. R. § 1300.0120, subp. 1, 4 (2015).
May/2017
4-8
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Zoning code
State law also authorizes municipalities to regulate land use such as building structure uses,
density, placement, and sizes.
9
Cities have more flexibility with respect to zoning ordinances
compared to building codes. That is because the state building code is mandated upon
cities, but there is not a parallel state zoning code. While two cities have parallel provisions
in waste and recycling ordinances, cities generally regulate waste and recycling enclosure
requirements through zoning ordinances.
Every Dakota County city has a waste enclosure requirement in its respective zoning
ordinance, with the exception of Farmington and Hastings. However, not every city code
specifically requires recycling enclosures. Where recycling enclosures are required,
specification standards vary across cities with respect to size, material, setback, opacity,
and whether a permit is required to develop the structure. See Table 4.2 for a summary of
city commercial recycling enclosure requirements.
For new buildings, enclosure area review and inspection is incorporated into the building
permit site plan review process.
For existing buildings, an inspection may or may not be required. Under the building code,
certain enclosure designs always require final inspection, which typically include accessory
buildings with load bearing roofs, and enclosures attached to the adjacent building. If
enclosures are constructed such that the building code requires inspection, all cities require
permits and conduct follow up inspections. Burnsville is the only city that specifically
requires all waste and recycling enclosures to be accessory buildings with load bearing
roofs. Where the building code does not apply, about half the cities reported processing
permit applications and conducting follow up inspections for waste and recycling enclosures.
These cities include: Burnsville, Eagan, Rosemount, South St. Paul, and West St. Paul.
Remaining cities either process a permit without follow up inspection or do not require
zoning permits.
City permit and inspection requirements consume city staff time. While most cities identified
sufficient capacity to process an increasing number of permit applications, South St. Paul
did not. South St. Paul indicated that they do not have enough staff to handle a moderate
increase in enclosure permits.
9
Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 1 (2011).
May/2017
4-9
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Table 4.2. Summary of city recycling enclosure minimum requirements.
City
Recycling
enclosure
Permit
required
Structure
design
10
Material
requirement
Fees
Apple Valley
Yes
Over 200
ft
2
or 7 ft
high
Fence, wall,
landscaping,
or earth berm
Solid
material, or
trees and
hedges
If a permit is
required:
valuation fee
Burnsville
Yes
Yes -
building
Enclosed
building
Same as
main building
Valuation fee
Eagan
Yes
Yes
building
Open top 6’–
10’ to fit
containers
Same as
main building
Valuation fee
Farmington
No
-*
-
-
-
Hastings
No
-
-
-
-
Inver Grove
Heights
No
-
-
-
-
Lakeville
Screening
only
-
-
-
-
Mendota
Heights
Screening
only
If building
an
enclosure -
zoning
Open top
None
Valuation fee
Rosemount
Yes
Yes
building
Open top to
fit containers
but < 600 ft
2
New- same
as building;
Old- wood or
chain link
with 85%
opacity
Valuation fee
South St.
Paul
Yes/No
depends on
district, but
city policy is
Yes
Yes -
zoning
Open top
Concrete or
non-
combustible
material
$30
West St.
Paul
No
If building
an
enclosure -
building
Open top
Maintenance
free
Valuation fee
* “-“ indicates there is not a city code for that category.
With the exception of Burnsville, interviewed staff from cities that require recycling
enclosures supported providing temporary exemptions from enclosure requirements at
existing buildings where businesses want to add recycling services. The general sense is
that a 3-6 month window for a temporary exemption is probably reasonable. The purpose
being that a business, with technical assistance, may be able to reduce its trash bin size as
it increases recycling, and therefore, the business may not need to expand its enclosure
space. However, the presumption that reducing trash and increasing recycling does not
require increased space is purely theoretical at this point. Nevertheless, interviewed city
staff were supportive of temporary exemptions from enclosure requirements. Some city
10
Structure design depends somewhat on zoning district. For example, in Eagan an enclosure must be
attached to the building in certain zones and not others.
May/2017
4-10
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
staff indicated codes would not need to be amended to provide the exemption, while other
cities supported a code amendment.
Finally, fire inspectors appear to have the highest number of touches on commercial
building structures due to regular inspections. Cities are generally willing to provide that list
to Dakota County upon request. Fire inspectors may review waste and recycling spaces for
fire hazards, but otherwise do not review whether a business has recycling.
Overall, the most significant finding is that enclosure requirements vary greatly across the
cities. Businesses in cities with enclosure requirements with be disproportionately affected
by increased commercial recycling due higher costs of construction.
4.2 CITY MECHANISMS INVENTORY
4.2.1 Management Requirements: Solid waste, Recycling, and Organics
Overall, cities do not have codes relative to commercial recycling requirements. In fact,
none of the cities have recycling or organics collection codes specific to commercial
businesses with the following exceptions: Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, and Lakeville
have recycling requirements for multi-unit dwellings. See Table 4.3 for a summary of
management requirements.
Multi-unit Collection Requirement
Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, and Lakeville mandate multi-unit dwelling recycling by
requiring that associations or management entities contracting for garbage collection, must
also contract for recycling collection. However, city interview information revealed that cities
do not have an enforcement mechanism to ensure compliance with multi-unit recycling
requirements. Additionally, while Farmington does not require multi-unit recycling, interview
information confirms that all but one multi-unit dwelling currently contracts for recycling.
Farmington offers recycling services to all businesses, but does not expressly require
businesses to use the service. Finally, Farmington does not provide organics services and
therefore, establishments contract for organics collection directly with haulers.
Targeted Recyclables
Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, and Mendota Heights each
have a code definition for “targeted recyclables.” The categories of targeted recyclables are
generally consistent across cities, but the specific language is not. Lakeville and Burnsville
require that multi-unit dwelling associations or management entities contract for recycling
services that collect defined targeted recyclables.
Container Management
Apple Valley, Farmington, and Rosemount have container requirements for property owners.
Apple Valley requires that occupants of private commercial establishments must provide
sufficient containers to contain all refuse and yard waste, but not specifically recyclables.
Farmington requires that all municipal solid waste and recyclables be placed in city-provided
containers. Rosemount requires that all accumulation of waste and recyclables shall be
placed in a tightly closed container designed to hold the respective waste material. Other
cities do not have owner/occupant requirements for container management.
Cities do not have informal collection requirements not specified in code. For example, there
are no restrictions on food packaging, plastic bags, or other material types. There are not
municipal requirements specific to organics storage and enclosures, but the State does have
May/2017
4-11
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
sanitation requirements for organics storage. In the event a business recycles organics, the
owner/operator will be subject to State container and storage requirements. Discussion
relative to storage and enclosures is provided below in Sections 3.2.3 and 3.2.4.
Table 4.3. City solid waste, recycling, and organics requirements.
City
Code Requirement
Garbage
Collection
Recycling
Collection
Organics
Collection
Recycling
Frequency
11
Container
Labels
Apple Valley
Yes
Multi-unit only
No
Weekly
No
Burnsville
Yes
Multi-unit only
No
-*
No
Eagan
Yes
Multi-unit only
No
Weekly
No
Farmington
Yes
No
No
Biweekly
No
Hastings
Yes
No
No
-
No
Inver Grove
Heights
Yes
No
No
-
No
Lakeville
Yes
Multi-unit only
No
Weekly
No
Mendota
Heights
Yes
No
No
-
No
Rosemount
No
No
No
Weekly
No
South St.
Paul
Yes
No
No
-
No
West St.
Paul
Yes
No
No
-
No
* “-“ indicates there is not a city code for that category.
Required: Generally, the State and County have not codified mandates that require cities
to have solid waste, recycling, and organics management requirements with the exception
of bans on burning and burying waste.
Voluntary: City codes relative to solid waste, recycling, and organics requirements are
voluntary.
4.2.2 Hauler Requirements: Solid waste, Recycling, and Organics
Generally, each Dakota County city requires licenses for solid waste and recycling haulers.
Cities do not have independent licenses for organics haulers. Nevertheless, the
understanding appears to be that organics falls within both solid waste and recycling
definitions, and the abundance of organics haulers is low enough that there is no present
need to independently license such haulers. This could be subject to change in the future as
organics management expands. In addition to hauler licensing, cities have other
requirements for licensees including container management, opportunity to recycle, volume
based pricing, reporting, collection frequency, and disposal facility. See Table 4.4 for a
summary of hauler requirements.
Hauler license application forms are included as Appendix B.
Licenses
Minn. Stat. § 115A.93 requires mixed municipal solid waste (MSW) haulers to be licensed in
the jurisdiction where MSW is collected. Therefore, each MSW hauler must obtain a city and
a County license. However, cities are not obligated to license haulers, and if a city opts out
11
Recycling frequency applies to multi-unit dwellings and commercial buildings.
May/2017
4-12
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
the County must adopt the city jurisdiction. State law requires recycling haulers to register
with the MPCA and does require licensure from Counties or cities.
According to interview information, city staff expressed that licensing recycling haulers
enabled cities to decide how many haulers to license, pick-up schedules, and general terms
and conditions required to operate in the city. Licenses are renewed annually, with most
cities designating December 31
st
as the expiration date independent from the date of
licensure. Some cities have a general license for all haulers while others designate
categories such as commercial, residential, industrial, or some combination thereof. Most
city codes require license applications that contain general information including name,
equipment, description of services, place/facility of disposal, insurance, methods of
collection, etc., and any other information required by the city clerk or city council.
Container Management
Apple Valley, Burnsville, Farmington, and Rosemount each have codified requirements that
haulers keep the waste container area clean and free of debris. Apply Valley requires that
haulers notify customers when containers are in poor repair, and annually notify customers
about proper placement. The hauler defines what is proper placement. Burnsville requires
that containers identify the company name and contact information. Farmington contracts
for recycling services and the contractor is required to provide containers to customers.
Finally, Rosemount specifies that haulers shall clean spills and otherwise keep the enclosure
area clean. Cities do not require haulers to label containers by materials collected.
Table 4.4. City solid waste, recycling, and organics requirements.
City
Code Requirement
Container
Management
Opportunity
to Recycle
Volume
based
pricing
Reporting
Disposal
facility
requirement
Apple
Valley
Yes
Multi-unit only
No
Yes
No
Burnsville
Yes
Multi-unit only
No
No
Yes
Eagan
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Farmington
Yes
No
Yes-contract
Yes-
contract
No
Hastings
No
Yes
No/Unknown
Yes
No
Inver Grove
Heights
No
Multi-unit only
No
No
Yes
Lakeville
No
Multi-unit only
No
Yes
No
Mendota
Heights
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Rosemount
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
South St.
Paul
No
No
No
No
No
West St.
Paul
No
No
No
No
No
Opportunity to Recycle
About half the cities require that haulers offer recycling services to multi-unit dwellings.
Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Hastings, and Inver Grove Heights require that haulers offer
the recycling services to all residents including multi-unit dwellings. Only Hastings and
Eagan require haulers to offer recycling to commercial entities. Although not in code,
May/2017
4-13
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Farmington provides commercial recycling opportunities to all commercial establishments
through its contracted hauler.
Volume Based Pricing
Cities do not have volume based pricing for commercial customers, with the exception of
Farmington. While Burnsville and Inver Grove Heights have volume based pricing
requirements for residential customers, there are not parallel provisions for commercial
customers. One reason may be that residential waste generation is fairly consistent in
volume and content, while commercial waste streams are highly variable from sector to
sector, business size, or building space. Additionally, commercial businesses and haulers
may negotiate container size and pick-up frequency to get the best available deal on both
ends. As such, volume based fee structures may not encompass other variables that need
consideration in the commercial waste world.
Reporting
Cities generally do not have a programmatic need for reporting requirements in city codes.
While Apple Valley, Eagan, Hastings, Farmington (via contract), and Mendota Heights have
reporting requirements, cities do not appear to require this information to manage recycling
and other waste management activities at the city-level. Cities do provide the collected
reporting information to the County. Farmington is the exception because the city manages
a contract with its hauler and, therefore, frequently reviews hauler metrics.
Required: Cities are not required to license haulers or otherwise regulate hauler activities.
State statutes place the burden to license haulers on the County.
Voluntary: Minn. Stat. § 115A.93 requires MSW haulers to be licensed in the jurisdiction
where MSW is collected. Therefore, each MSW hauler must obtain a city and a County
license. However, cities are not obligated to license haulers, and if a city opts out the
County must adopt the city jurisdiction. State law requires recycling haulers to register with
the MPCA and does require licensure from Counties or cities.
Minn. Stat. § 115A.552 requires that Counties provide the opportunity for all residents to
recycle, including residents in multi-unit dwellings. There is no apparent delegation
authority within this statute and, therefore, city requirements are technically voluntary.
Other nonresidential recycling requirements are not required of cities or Counties with
respect to hauler activities
4.2.3 Building Code Requirements: Recycling Space
Each metropolitan city is required to adopt and administer the state building code.
12
The
Minnesota Department of Labor is the regulatory agency responsible for promulgating
building code rules. The most recent state building code was adopted in 2015. Despite some
out of date references, all cities have expressly adopted the State building code. Some cities
have adopted additional codes, but these are essentially administrative and State
requirements supersede any city codes.
13
In practice, cities strictly implement the State
building code and have very little autonomy in this regard.
12
Minn. Stat. § 326B.121 (2013). If a city fails to adopt the code, the State will administer and
enforce building regulations.
13
Cities may adopt codes relative to fees, violations, timing, site conditions, etc., but these codes
remain subject to regulations.
May/2017
4-14
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Building permit applications and associated documents are included as Appendix C.
New buildings
In 2007, the State enacted a statute requiring that recycling space must be identified on all
site plans submitted for a building permit.
14
Building permits are required for all new or
significantly modified structures, with certain exceptions including one-story detached
accessory structures less than 200 square feet, and fences less than seven (7) feet high.
15
See Figure 4.1 for a flow chart of permit application regulatory requirements.
Cities appear to consistently apply and comply with building code recycling space
requirements. Generally, a person must submit the site plan review and associated
construction documents to the city building official. After the building official reviews site
plans for compliance with the State code, the city council will approve the project. When
construction is complete, the building official conducts a final on-site inspection.
As mentioned earlier, cities routinely evaluate recycling space requirements for new building
permits. Interview information revealed that multi-unit commercial site plans typically
include one combined waste and recycling space at a single designated location. However,
most cities generally confirmed that after occupancy multi-unit commercial buildings usually
end up with several dumpsters behind a building. As such, where multi-unit commercial
buildings are concerned, each unit may end up with a space conveniently located, but such
areas are not required to be shown on building permit plans, and may not be enclosed.
Figure 4.1. State regulations for building permit application review.
14
Minn. R. § 1303.1500 (2007).
15
Minn. R. § 1300.0120, Subp. 1, 4 (2015).
May/2017
4-15
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Existing buildings
The State building code generally does not require site plan review for non-significant
modifications to existing buildings and, therefore, does not require a site plan identifying
recycling space. However, where attached accessory structures are concerned, a building
permit is required. No cities have adopted building codes that require recycling space for
existing buildings. Generally, zoning ordinances address enclosures requirements for
existing buildings, including materials, size, and structural design. Some cities use the same
building permit application process for enclosures, and others use designated zoning permit
applications.
Fees
The State code regulates building permit fees, which are based on construction value.
16
Site
plan review is 65% of the building permit fee.
17
With the exception of South St. Paul, cities
charge 65% of the permit fee for enclosure site plan review for existing buildings. South St.
Paul charges a flat rate of $30 per enclosure fence.
Interview information revealed that enclosure site plan review for existing buildings was
typically $200-$400 depending on the construction value. Lakeville indicated the city would
be willing to waive the site plan review fee for such enclosures. South St. Paul is not willing
to waive the fee, and other cities did not express an opinion.
Cities reported that enclosures generally range in cost from approximately $6,000 to
$50,000. Cost primarily depends on the materials used to construct the enclosure, and most
enclosures run over $10,000. Based on State code regulations the following table provides
projected permit and site plan review costs:
Table 4.5. Projected permit and site plan review costs.
Enclosure Value
Permit Fee
18
Site Plan Review Fee
19
Total cost
$6,000
$149.70
$97.31
$6,247
$50,000
$794.15
$496.70
$51,261
The above projected permit and site plan review costs are limited to existing buildings
without recycling enclosures. It is unknown how many existing buildings with businesses
NAICS code 42-81 currently recycle one or more materials.
Required: Cities must adhere to State building code regulations.
Voluntary: Cities have some flexibility concerning permit and site plan review fees.
4.2.4 Zoning Requirements: Recycling Space
State law authorizes municipalities to regulate land use such as building structure uses,
density, placement, and sizes.
20
Cities have more flexibility with respect to zoning
ordinances compared to building codes. That is because the State mandates that cities
16
Minn. Stat. § 36B.153, subd. 1 (b) (2009).
17
Minn. R. § 1300.0160 (2015); Minn. Stat. § 36B.153, subd. 2.
18
Minn. Stat. § 36B.153, subd. 1 (b).
19
Minn. Stat. § 36B.153, subd. 2
20
Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 1 (2011).
May/2017
4-16
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
follow the building code, whereas the State authorized cities to create and implement zoning
codes with little oversight.
Every Dakota County city has a waste enclosure requirement in its respective zoning
ordinance, with the exception of Farmington and Hastings. Where recycling enclosures are
required, specification standards vary across cities with respect to size, material, setback,
opacity, and whether a permit is required to develop the structure. See Table 4.3 above for
a summary of city commercial recycling enclosure requirements. The following table
supplements summary information in Table 4.3.
Table 4.6. Zoning requirements for enclosure space.
City
Code Requirement
Recycling
enclosure
Explicit in
Code
City Policy
All zoning
districts
Applicable
districts
Apple Valley
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
-
Burnsville
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
Eagan
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
R-4, LB,
NB, GB,
CSC, RD, I-
1, I-2, PF,
and BP
Farmington
No
No
No
-
-
Hastings
No
No
-*
-
-
Inver Grove
Heights
Yes
No
Yes
No
A, E-1, E-2,
R-1 and R-
2
Lakeville
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
Mendota
Heights
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
Rosemount
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
-
South St.
Paul
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
-
West St.
Paul
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
-
* “-“ indicates there is not a city code for that category.
For new buildings, enclosure area review and inspection is incorporated into the building
permit site plan review process.
Existing buildings
As mentioned above, about half the cities process permit applications and conducting follow
up inspections for waste and recycling enclosures. These cities include: Burnsville, Eagan,
Rosemount, South St. Paul, and West St. Paul. If enclosures are constructed such that the
building code requires inspection, all cities conduct follow up inspections. Burnsville is the
only city that specifically requires all waste and recycling enclosures to be accessory
buildings with load bearing roofs.
City permit and inspection requirements consume city staff time. While most cities identified
sufficient capacity to process an increasing number of permit applications, South St. Paul
did not.
May/2017
4-17
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
With the exception of Burnsville, all cities that require recycling enclosures expressed a
willingness to work with temporary exemptions for existing businesses that want to add
recycling services.
Minnesota Department of Health
In addition to zoning requires, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) promulgated a
set of regulations relative to outdoor waste storage areas at food establishments. It appears
that city codes are consistent with MDH regulations for waste and recyclables. However, it is
not clear whether zoning requirements encompass MDH rules for outdoor food
waste/organic storage. This is primarily because cities have not encountered circumstances
requiring incorporation of such rules as few, if any, commercial entities recycle organics.
The MDH does not have extensive requirements for outdoor organics storage. Generally,
MDH requires a “durable, cleanable, insect- and rodent-resistant, leakproof, and
nonabsorbent”
21
container. The container must be located separate from food,
22
and if
stored outside must be on a non-absorbent surface
23
that is curbed and graded to collect
liquid waste resulting from cleaning the area.
24
The MDH has at least ten rules relative to waste, recycling, and returnables storage. The
rules are essentially redundant, repetitive, and out of date considering changes in waste,
recycling, and terminology since 2007. MDH rules do not appear to present obstacles
relative to enclosure requirements, but likely will impact containers and surface
construction.
Required: While MDH has rules relative to waste, recycling, and “returnables” storage at
food establishments, these rules appear to apply to the business establishment and there is
no direct requirement for cities to comply or enforce such regulations.
Voluntary: State law declares that cities may implement land use regulations, but there do
not appear to be mandates relative to enclosures.
4.2.5 Enforcement
Multi-unit dwelling recycling requirements
City codes requiring recycling, or the opportunity to recycle, at multi-unit dwellings are
largely not enforced. At most, such codes are addressed on a complaint basis.
Hauler Requirements
City codes relative to haulers are enforced via licensing and on a complaint basis. Cities did
not report receiving complaints relative to haulers, and generally did not report compliance
issues with regard to licensing.
Building code
Violation of the building code is a misdemeanor under Minn. Stat. § 326B.082 and Minn. R.
§ 1300.0150. However, interview information indicates that cities have not issued
misdemeanors relative to enclosures and likely would not do so.
21
Minn. R. § 4626.1240 5-501.13 (2007).
22
Minn. R. § 4626.1240 5-501.19 (2007).
23
Minn. R. § 4626.1230 5-501.11 (2007).
24
Minn. R. § 4626.1420 6-202.110 (2007).
May/2017
4-18
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Zoning code
Cities indicated that enforcement of zoning codes relative to enclosures is complaint based.
Cities generally stated they do not receive a large number of complaints, but that
complaints about enclosures typically revolve around open gates or blowing debris.
Required/Voluntary: Enforcement implementation procedures are not codified.
4.3 OTHER CITIES COMPARISON
Wenck researched and identified mechanisms used by five other cities in the state or nation
that have demonstrated effective diversion in the commercial/multiunit sectors. Selected
cities are of similar size and characteristics as Dakota County cities and have demonstrated
performance outcomes with respect to commercial recycling. Cities researched were:
Alameda, California
Austin, Texas
Seattle, Washington
Minneapolis, Minnesota
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Overall, cities with strong mandates and enforcement show the highest diversion rates.
Additionally, cities that carve out exceptions to commercial recycling mandates show lower
diversion rates. For example, cities that provide exceptions for existing buildings have lower
recycling rates compared to cities without such exclusions. Detailed research results are
included as Appendix D.
California State/Alameda, California
State
Since 2012, California State has required multifamily residential dwellings of five units or
more to arrange for recycling services. The multifamily property owner must take at least
one of the following actions:
Source separate recyclable materials from solid waste and subscribe to a basic level
of recycling service that includes collection, self-hauling, or other arrangements for
the pickup of the recycling materials and/or:
Subscribe to a recycling service that may include mixed waste processing that yields
diversion results comparable to source separation.
Beginning in April 2016, a new series of mandates and timelines go into effect that require
businesses, including multifamily properties of five units or more, that generate organic
waste to arrange for recycling services.
25
City
In 2012, the Alameda County Waste Management Authority (ACWMA) enacted a Mandatory
Recycling Ordinance that requires businesses, institutions, and multi-family properties with
five or more units to sort their recyclables from their trash. Multi-family property owners as
25
AB 1826, Chesbro, Chapter 727, Stat 2014 of the State of California.
May/2017
4-19
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
well as businesses and institutions that generate food waste, such as restaurants and
grocery stores, must also divert compostable materials.
Diversion
In 2010, the City of Alameda reached a 67 percent recycling rate. After enacting recycling
mandates the City’s recycling rate increased to 76 percent in 2015.
Enforcement
Citations are issued to businesses and multi-family property owners in violation of the
Mandatory Recycling Ordinance.
Austin, Texas
On November 4, 2010, the Austin City Council approved the Universal Recycling Ordinance
(URO) which became effective October 1, 2012.
On April 25, 2013, Austin City Council approved amendments to the Universal Recycling
Ordinance to include all commercial and multi-family residential properties within the city
limits of Austin, Texas. This amendment also expanded efforts to include organics
diversion for any food enterprise that requires a food permit under Secti on 10-3-61 of the
Austin City Code.
All multifamily and commercial properties will be phased in over time. By October 1, 2017,
all properties will be required to provide recycling services to their tenants and employees,
and properties with flood service permits will be required to provide food scrap diversion
programs.
Diversion
Diversion rates were not available for the City of Austin.
Enforcement
The URO enables city staff to conduct a site visit through staff observation or public
complaint. If violation is found, a 30-day Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is issued. The owner is
then required to correct any deficiencies and provide documentation to show compliance.
Second and third NODs may be issued. After third NOD, the matter is referred to the Austin
Code Department and owners may incur fines up to $2,000 per day for each day of ongoing
violation.
Seattle, Washington
In 2005, the City of Seattle adopted Municipal Codes 21.36.082 and 21.36.083 that require
commercial, multi-unit, and residential recycling and organics diversion by 2015. Exceptions
to the ordinance include:
Existing commercial structures that do not have adequate storage space for
recyclable materials
26
may be exempt from all or portions of this Section if so
determined by the Director of Seattle Public Utilities.
New or Expanded Structures: New structures permitted in commercial zones that
have demonstrated difficulty in meeting the solid waste and recyclable materials
storage space specifications required under SMC Section 23.54.040 may be exempt
26
This is not an exemption from enclosure space, but an exemption from recycling altogether.
May/2017
4-20
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
from all or portions of this Section as determined by the Director of Seattle Public
Utilities.
Free city recycling is available for apartments, condominiums, co-ops, fraternities/sororities
and house boats.
Diversion
The most current annual reporting regarding recycling rates is the 2015 summary,
published July 1, 2016. The overall municipal solid waste recycling rate for 2015 was 58
percent. The single-family recycling rate for 2015 was 74.3 percent. The commercial
recycling rate was 62.3-percent, and the multi-unit recycling rate was 36.8 percent.
Enforcement
Enforcement includes a potential $50 fee per collection pickup.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
As of January 1, 1995, the City of Minneapolis requires by Ordinance (Chapter 225, Article
VI) that every owner of a building with two or more dwelling units must provide, by contract
with a licensed private collection vendor, recycling services and adequate containers for all
recyclable materials. Additionally, the building owner must distribute recycling education
information to tenants at the time of lease and at least annually thereafter.
As of Sept. 1, 2011, all Minneapolis commercial and business property owners are required
to offer recycling (Chapter 174, Article IV). By ordinance, commercial property owners and
managers are required to provide bi-weekly collection, containers, and a recycling plan.
Diversion
The City of Minneapolis’s overall diversion rate in 2016 was 36.3 percent, of which 21.84
percent was recycled, and 15.09 percent was composted.
Enforcement
The city fire inspector is responsible for enforcement along with the city engineer.
Enforcement of multi-unit residential requirements enables the city engineer to make notice
of compliance failure, require 10 days to compliance with the ordinance and provides
penalty for noncompliance of $100 first offense, $200 for second offense within 12-months
of first offense, $450 for third offense within 12-months of first offense and $700 for the
fourth and subsequent offense within 12-months of the first offense.
Enforcement of commercial recycling enables the fire marshal and authorized
representatives to mail a warning notice stating they have 10 business days to comply.
Failure to comply is subject to an administrative penalty pursuant to Chapter 2 and the
schedule of civil fines adopted by the City Council. Further, failure to comply may constitute
cause for denial, suspension, revocation or refusal to issue the certificate of commercial
building registration.
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
City Code Chapter 22, Division 3 requires Recycling For Multiple-Family Residential
Structures. The code mandates separation of recyclables at structures consisting of five or
more apartments, townhomes, condominiums, or other living units. It is the responsibility of
building or association owners to have recycling containers available and accessible, and
provide recycling collection services at least twice each month to all residents. Every
May/2017
4-21
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
resident must separate recyclables from all refuse, and must store recyclables in containers
designated for the storage of recyclables.
Currently, the City of St. Louis Park references Minn. Stat. § 115A.151 in that as of January
1, 2016, owners of commercial buildings within the 7-county metro area that generate at
least four cubic yards of MSW per week must recycle at least three materials.
Diversion
The City of St. Louis Park does not have current waste diversion information available.
Enforcement
City Code Chapter 22 Solid Waste Management is silent regarding an enforcement
mechanism for recycling, i.e., there is no codified provision relative to enforcement.
May/2017
5-1
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
5.0 Identified Barriers
5.1 COMMERCIAL RECYCLING BARRIERS
In its simplest form, increasing commercial recycling requires two things: (1) adding
recycling bins on the ground at establishments that do not currently recycle, and (2)
providing technical assistance at businesses that do recycle but have low diversion rates.
While several variables influence the ability to add recycling bins and increase diversion,
certain factors stand out as having a greater impact on such objectives.
Based on completed research and inventory activities, Wenck has identified logistical and
policy barriers relative to increasing commercial recycling. Logistical barriers concern city
codes, staff, and finances. Policy barriers include city council priorities, city-county
relationships, and cities’ disposition with regard to modifying regulations. Wenck has
identified the following barriers:
Logistical barriers:
Enclosure construction and permit costs
City recycling staff time
Absence of a local compliance or regulatory structure
Inability to identify businesses that do and don’t recycle
Lack of incentive programs
Lack of technical assistance
Space to add enclosures at existing buildings
Multi-unit commercial buildings
Policy barriers:
Enclosure requirements for recycling space
Enclosure aesthetic and design preferences
Political incentive to adopt city-level mandates
5.1.1 Logistical Barriers
Enclosure construction and permit costs
Not every building in Dakota County will need enclosure development. However, the
potential costs for enclosure construction presents a barrier to increasing commercial
recycling. As described in Section 3.2.3, construction and permit costs at existing buildings
without recycling range from approximately $6,000 to over $50,000 per enclosure.
As of 2015, Dakota County has 7,826 businesses between National American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes 42-81.
27
The spread of businesses across Dakota
county is not consistent with substantially higher numbers of businesses in Burnsville and
Eagan, and somewhat low numbers in Farmington and Rosemount. See Table 5.1 for a
breakdown of commercial entities by city.
27
The State commercial recycling mandate applies to businesses with NAICS code 42-81. See Minn.
Stat. § 115A.151.
May/2017
5-2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Table 5.1. Breakdown of commercial entities with a NAICS code between 42-81.
Municipality
# of commercial
entities NAICS 42-81
Apple Valley
785
Burnsville
2,029
Eagan
1,614
Farmington
209
Hastings
463
Inver Grove Heights
451
Lakeville
819
Mendota Heights
343
Rosemount
258
South St Paul
329
West St Paul
526
Total
7,826
Data Source: InfoGroup (Nov 15).
Information obtained from the County indicates that while 7,826 businesses operate in
Dakota County, the number of buildings occupied by businesses with NAICS codes between
42-81 is lower, and is approximately 4,100. Additionally, County information identifies that
about 10% of existing buildings may need enclosure development or expansion. Considering
that roughly 10% of the 4,100 buildings may need to construct enclosure to add recycling
space, the best estimate for potential enclosure costs follows:
Table 5.2. Estimated costs to add recycling enclosures at 10% of buildings
occupied by businesses with NAICS codes between 42-81 and that generate 4
cubic yards or more of solid waste per week.
Individual
Enclosure Value
28
Total Enclosure cost
Permit and Site Plan
Review Fees
Total cost
$6,000*
$2,460,000
$101,272
$2,561,272
$6,000**
$1,968,000
$81,017
$2,049,018
* Assumes 100% of buildings generate more than 4 cubic yards of municipal solid waste per
week.
** Assumes 80% of buildings generate more than 4 cubic yards of municipal solid waste per
week.
Space for enclosures: setbacks
Interviewed city staff acknowledge that additional space for recycling enclosures may be
problematic in certain circumstances. Where zoning setback codes restrict site development,
enclosure construction may present obstacles. City staff supported working with businesses
to reduce such barriers.
Space for enclosures: parking space
City zoning codes regulate the number of parking lot spaces. Where space is a limiting
factor, the addition of recycling enclosures may require eliminating a parking space. City
28
The low end of the range of enclosure costs ($6,000) was used in these estimates.
May/2017
5-3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
staff indicated having successfully worked around parking space barriers in the past and city
staff consistently expressed interest in working with businesses to find solutions in the
future.
City recycling staff time
Based on conducted interviews, cities do not have sufficient capacity to implement
commercial recycling programs. City staff designated to recycling activities have multiple
other city roles, or in the case of Dakota Valley Recycling (DVR) and South St. Paul, Inver
Grove Heights, and West St. Paul, city staff is responsible for multiple cities. Even if cities
received more Community Funding money, staff consistently reiterated that County staff
would need to be responsible for commercial recycling activities.
Compliance and Regulatory Structure
The County does not have a compliance or regulatory structure relative to commercial
recycling. This is a barrier for primarily two reasons: (1) inability to identify high priority
entities, and (2) cities with regulatory and compliance systems have substantially higher
recycling rates than cities without.
Absent an information gathering mechanism, the County will probably not have adequate
information to develop an efficient implementation strategy.
Second, cities with successful commercial recycling programs have implemented strong
mandates with enforcement components. Weak mandates have less impact on diversion
rates, and essentially no impact without enforcement. And, without mandates at higher
levels of government, mandates appear to have little impact on diversion. For example,
California State and Alameda County, California have commercial and multi-unit dwelling
recycling mandates. The City of Alameda adopted the county mandate and increased its
recycling rate from 67 percent to 76 percent in only five years. Compare Alameda to
Minneapolis, Minnesota, located within Hennepin County, which does not have a commercial
recycling mandate. Minneapolis has had a commercial mandate since 2011 and has
achieved a 36 percent recycling rate. One reason for this might be that monitoring and
enforcement is implemented during fire inspections, which may not be conducted at every
building each year, and that without support at County and State levels, such requirements
have less impact.
Incentive Program
Cities do not have recycling incentive programs for commercial entities. The County
developed a Business Recycling Incentive Program that provide up to $10,000, including up
to $7,500 for waste enclosure improvements. While the $7,500 may be sufficient for
businesses in cities with low cost design requirements, incentive funds will have less of an
impact in cities with high cost design requirements. And, most Dakota County businesses
are located in cities with high cost design specifications. Additionally, a blanket approach to
incentive programsmeaning any business with NAICS 42-81 is eligiblelimits the ability to
focus on high generator entities and meaningfully increase diversion.
Technical Assistance
The County and cities recognize that adding a recycling bin on the ground does not mean
employees or customers recycle properly. As such, diversion is not increased by simply
contracting for service. Absent technical assistance, employees are unlikely to receive
training in best management practices and recycling rate increases will stagnate. A blanket
approach to technical assistancemeaning any business with NAICS 42-81 is eligiblelimits
the ability to focus on high generator entities and meaningfully increase diversion.
May/2017
5-4
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
Multi-unit commercial buildings
For new buildings, the State code requires recycling space for a singular building, not
individual tenants. Interview information revealed that multi-unit commercial site plans
typically include one combined waste and recycling space at a single designated location.
However, most cities generally confirmed that after occupancy, multi-unit buildings usually
end up with several dumpsters behind a building. As such, where multi-unit commercial
buildings are concerned, each unit may end up with a space conveniently located, but such
areas are not required to be shown on building permit plans, and may not be enclosed.
With respect to existing buildings, the practicability of adding enclosures behind multi-unit
commercial buildings involves more nuanced consideration including cooperative contracts.
The intricacies involved with developing a workable system at a reasonable cost requires
more hands-on management, time, and organization compared to stand-alone buildings.
5.1.2 Policy Barriers
Enclosure aesthetics
Historically, according to city staff, enclosure requirements developed as a result of blowing
debris, waste piles aggregating outside of dumpsters, and unsightly aesthetics. Overall, high
enclosure costs are associated with construction material and design requirements. For
example, both Burnsville and Eagan require enclosures be constructed of materials
consistent with the main building. Burnsville requires a load-bearing roof, and in some
zoning districts, Eagan requires the enclosure be attached to the main building which
triggers the need for a sprinkler system. Interviewed city staff did not express motivation to
change this requirement. Such enclosures may range from $30,000 to $50,000. As
approximately 47 percent of businesses with NAICS codes 42-81 reside in Burnsville and
Eagan, the high cost coupled with city policies to maintain material requirements is a barrier
to advancing commercial recycling.
Temporary exemptions
With the exception of Burnsville, all cities that require recycling enclosures expressed a
willingness to work with temporary exemptions for existing businesses that want to add
recycling services. The general sense is that a 3-6 month window for temporary exemption
is probably reasonable. However, the current policy is not to provide exemptions. Until cities
implement a temporary exemption policy, right-sizing enclosure spaces remains a barrier.
City staff priorities
Interviewed city staff supported considering multi-unit dwelling recycling mandates.
However, staff indicated the political environment was probably less willing to consider
adopting city-level commercial recycling mandates.
May/2017
6-1
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
6.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
6.1.1 Findings
Residents in multi-unit dwellings do not have the same access to recycling
opportunities as residents in single-family homes.
All eleven cities’ staff either have, or expressed support to consider adopting, codes
requiring owners/operators of multi-unit dwellings to contract for recycling services,
but cities do not have the resources to implement a compliance system.
States/counties/cities with commercial mandates have higher recycling rates.
County-level mandates are more effective that city-level codes because they provide
consistency across the County. Dakota County cities will comply with a County
commercial recycling mandate, but interviewed city staff did not express support to
adopt city-level mandates.
Seven of eleven cities require recycling enclosures, which range in cost from $6,000-
$50,000.
Cities are willing to work with temporary exemptions from enclosure requirements
while businesses that want to add recycling determine space requirements.
City fire departments have a comprehensive list of commercial buildings and site
contacts.
Business recycling begins with contracted services, but is only successful when
properly managed. A County grant fund for technical assistance is necessary to
support successful recycling practices at businesses and multi-unit dwellings.
6.1.2 Conclusions
Establishing County-city relationships with building and zoning staff will reduce
enclosure barriers as city building and zoning staff are willing to provide temporary
exemptions from enclosure requirements for businesses that want to add recycling.
And, city building and zoning staff are willing to work with businesses and the County
to reduce setback and parking space barriers at sites where enclosure development
is needed.
Residents in multi-unit dwellings are unlikely to recycle unless the building
owner/manager is required to contract for such services.
A business registration program will allow the County to determine what entities fall
within the regulated community, waste generation volume, and which businesses do
and do not currently recycle.
May/2017
6-2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
A County-level commercial recycling ordinance and compliance system will accelerate
increases in County recycling rates. Because the State commercial recycling law has
no compliance or enforcement arm, it is unlikely to meaningfully enhance
commercial recycling.
Businesses are unlikely to add recycling services without funds to support enclosure
construction.
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
Work with city policy makers to address the high cost associated with recycling
enclosure design specifications, and collaborate to determine reasonable minimum
design requirements.
Collaborate with cities to secure temporary exemptions from enclosure requirements
at businesses that want to add recycling space. This may be accomplished by
amending city codes to provide such exemptions.
Partner with cities to reduce setback and parking space barriers on a site-by-site
basis.
Adopt a County ordinance requiring that all owners/operators of multi-unit dwellings
and senior living associations must contract for recycling services, and provide model
language to cities.
Establish a registration and waste generation information reporting system for
businesses with NAICS 42-81. Work with city fire departments to obtain updated
building and business contact information.
Adopt a County commercial recycling ordinance consistent with Minnesota Statute
§ 115A.151, that focusses on a tiered, generation based implementation strategy.
Prioritize Business Recycling Incentive Program funds to focus on multi-unit
dwellings, stand-alone commercial buildings, and high volume generators in
geographic locations with low enclosure barriers.
Expand Business Recycling Incentive Program funding through Commercial
Strategies recommended in the 2016 SERA Report, such as tipping fees, taxes, or
pay as you throw programs.
6.2.1 Partner with Cities
State statutes delegate authority for waste and recycling management to counties, and the
State delegates land use and zoning authorities to cities. As such, increasing commercial
recycling necessitates County-city collaboration.
Enclosure design
Based on the findings of this study, city zoning regulations impact the cost of adding
recycling bins at commercial buildings because enclosure codes specify design and material
standards. Many cities’ enclosure design and material codes result in high construction
costs. As design and material specifications are largely aesthetic in nature, the County is
encouraged to work with city policy makers to address the high cost associated with
May/2017
6-3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
recycling enclosures, and collaborate to determine reasonable minimum design
requirements.
Minimum design requirements that screen dumpsters, restrict illegal dumping, and prevent
blowing debris need only be constructed of a maintenance free material. Cities such as
South St. Paul and Rosemount use maintenance free material standards for enclosures and
estimated construction costs around $6,000. Other cities such as Burnsville and Eagan,
require enclosures be constructed of materials consistent with the main building. Burnsville
requires a load-bearing roof, and in some zoning districts, Eagan requires the enclosure be
attached to the main building which triggers the need for a sprinkler system. Such
enclosures may range from $30,000 to $50,000. As approximately 47 percent of businesses
with NAICS codes 42-81 reside in Burnsville and Eagan, the County is encouraged with work
with policy makers to reduce the high cost of enclosures.
Wenck also suggests that the County evaluate the cost of working with city policy makers to
modify enclosure design codes compared with the cost of funding such enclosures.
Temporary exemptions
The County is encouraged to work with cities to implement temporary exemptions from
enclosure requirements at existing buildings where businesses want to add recycling
services. Interviewed city staff expressed support to provide temporary exemptions. Some
cities’ staff suggested that city council approval was needed. Providing exemptions may also
be accomplished by amending city codes.
Suggested model code:
(a) Businesses at existing buildings that add recycling services are temporarily exempt
from enclosure code requirements for a period not exceeding six months.
Enclosure space
Aside from cost, the County should work with cities to reduce other barriers to enclosure
development such as zoning setbacks and parking space requirements. Interviewed city
staff acknowledge that additional space for recycling enclosures may be problematic in
circumstances where zoning setback codes restrict site development. Additionally, where
space is a limiting factor, the addition of recycling enclosures may require eliminating a
parking space. City staff indicated having successfully worked around parking space barriers
in the past and city staff consistently expressed interest in working with businesses to find
solutions in the future. The County is encouraged to engage city staff to work through space
barriers on a site-by-site basis.
6.2.2 Multi-unit Dwelling Ordinance
Approximately 34 percent of housing in the County includes multi-unit dwellings, comprising
49,474 units. Breakdown of housing shows that approximately 16,170 units are apartments
located within 484 buildings; 27,281 townhouses; 5,989 condominiums; and, 34 assisted
living centers. Assuming that half already recycle, that leaves 24,737 units, of which 8,085
are apartments within 242 buildings. Based on historical Dakota County per capita recycling
rates,
29
and if the County has a goal to reach 100% of residents, a multi-unit dwelling
29
Calculated based on an average of the last ten years of SCORE reporting.
May/2017
6-4
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
recycling mandate has potential to divert over 12,715 additional tons per year, or an
increase of 2.8 percent.
30
To implement a multi-unit dwelling recycling mandate, up to 242 apartment units may need
additional enclosure space.
The County is encouraged to consider as a first phase: staggering implementation to spread
out costs. For example, the County might focus on apartment buildings with over fifty units
and organics diversion at assisted living facilities to capture high generator buildings. And,
geographically focus on cities with low barriers like West St. Paul and South St. Paul, which
have minimal enclosure design standards and are willing to provide temporary exemptions.
Apple Valley, Eagan, and Lakeville are also willing to provide temporary exemptions, but
have intermediate enclosure design specifications. Farmington and Hastings are considered
a low priority as these cities have organized collection and appear to currently provide
apartment buildings with recycling services. Burnsville is a bit of an outlier because of
loadbearing enclosure design codes. Inver Grove Heights and Mendota Heights fall
somewhere in the middle.
More research and fact-finding is necessary to further define a phased implementation
structure based on generator volume. The County may incorporate registration and
information reporting within a multi-unit dwelling ordinance.
31
Model Ordinance Language:
(a) Any owner or manager of a multi-unit dwelling or assisted living facility must
contract for at least weekly collection of recyclable materials for all residents residing
within each building.
(1) The owner or manager shall provide recycling containers in convenient
locations for residents, and adjacent to solid waste containers.
(2) The owner or manager is responsible for labelling solid waste and recycling
containers. Labels shall be of a color and size designated by the County.
(3) The owner or manager is responsible for distributing education materials to all
new residents, and to all residents annually.
(b) Any resident of a multi-unit dwelling shall separate recyclable materials, and store
recyclable materials in containers provided by the multi-unit dwelling owner or
manager.
(1) A resident need not use containers provided by the owner or manager if the
resident brings recyclable materials to a recycling center.
(c) By January 1, 2020, any multi-unit dwellings with at least 100 units shall comply
with Section (a) of this ordinance.
(d) By January 1, 2022, any multi-unit dwellings with at least 50 units shall comply with
Section (a) of this ordinance.
(e) By January 1, 2030, any multi-unit dwellings shall comply with Section (a) of this
ordinance.
(f) By January 1, 2025, any multi-unit dwellings with at least 10 units shall comply with
Section (a) of this ordinance.
30
Because the historical per capita recycling rate is an underestimate, since not all residents recycle,
this projection is inherently low.
31
Some, but not all, cities require apartment building licensing. As such, there are substantial time
and cost barriers to implementing new licensing requirements at cities without. Moreover, the Count
would still need to implement an information reporting system. In Wenck’s opinion, there are less
barriers to implement a registration and information reporting system at the County level.
May/2017
6-5
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
(g) Failure of any commercial entity with NAICS codes 42-81 to register with the County
may result in:
(1) $200 fine per month for the first offense;
(2) $500 fine per month for the second offense; and
(3) $1000 fine per month for the third offense.
The penalty provision provided above is suggested based on the success of hazardous waste
and water discharge statutes that have been very successful in reducing pollution. Those
programs typically penalize between $10,000 and $27,500 per day for permit and/or
reporting violations. Additionally, the City of Austin may fine up to $2,000 per day for
ongoing violations.
Multi-unit dwelling and Assisted living facility definitions
The County should work with cities to establish a consistent multi-unit dwelling definitions to
provide consistent implementation of a County multi-unit dwelling recycling ordinance. This
is not likely to be critical until the last phase of implementation as most cities define multi-
unit dwellings as consisting of at least 3, 4, or 5 units. The County should also adopt, and
provide to cities, model language for a definition of an assisted living facility.
6.2.3 Registration and Information Reporting
The County does not currently collect solid waste and recycling information from commercial
entities. The County should consider implementing a reporting compliance system, not that
different from information reported by hazardous waste generators.
For example, all commercial entities with NAICS codes between 42 and 81 might be
required to report: volume of MSW generated per week, broad categories of recyclable
materials generated, and whether the entity contracts for recycling. The County could
create a database to manage this information and use the inventory to prioritize commercial
recycling program implementation based on generator volume. Additionally, annual
generator reporting would record compliance information if a commercial or multi-unit
dwelling recycling mandate is adopted.
The County is strongly encouraged to build a relationship with city fire departments. Each
city’s fire department appears to maintain a regularly updated and comprehensive list of
commercial buildings and site contacts. Cities indicated the list would be easy to obtain and
Eagan has already provided the County with such a list. The County could use this list alone,
or in combination with Info USA data, which would likely encompass all relevant entities.
Model Ordinance Language:
(a) Any commercial entity with NAICS codes 42-81 shall register with the County by
June 30 each year.
(b) By June 30 each year, any commercial entity with NAICS codes 42-81 shall, on a
form provided by the County, submit to the County a record identifying:
(1) The volume of solid waste generated per week; and,
(2) A list of broad categories of recyclable materials generated.
(c) By June 30 each year, any commercial entity with NAICS codes 42-81 shall submit to
the County proof of its contracted recycling service, or receipt of disposal at a
recycling center.
May/2017
6-6
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
(d) Unless a commercial entity with NAICS code 42-81 is registered, a licensed solid
waste hauler shall not provide collection services for MSW.
32
(e) Failure of any commercial entity with NAICS codes 42-81 to register with the County
may result in:
(1) $200 fine per month for the first offense;
(2) $500 fine per month for the second offense; and
(3) $1000 fine per month for the third offense.
The penalty provision provided above is suggested based on the success of hazardous waste
and water discharge statutes that have been very successful in reducing pollution. Those
programs typically penalize between $10,000 and $27,500 per day for permit and/or
reporting violations. Additionally, the City of Austin may fine up to $2,000 per day for
ongoing violations.
6.2.4 Commercial Recycling Ordinance
Counties and cities with mandates have higher recycling rates, and Dakota County cities will
comply with a County-level commercial recycling mandate. The State commercial recycling
mandate provides political support to implement a County commercial recycling ordinance.
Because cities are not individually willing to adopt city-level mandates unless neighboring
cities do too, a County-level ordinance would level the city-to-city playing field.
Successful commercial recycling programs exist with strong regulatory structures that
include mandates with enforcement components. Weak mandates have less impact on
diversion rates, and essentially no impact without enforcement. Without mandates at State
and County levels of government, city-level codes appear to have little impact on diversion.
For example, California State and Alameda County, California have a multi-unit dwelling
recycling mandate. The City of Alameda therefore adopted such mandates and increased its
recycling rate from 67 percent to 76 percent in only five years. Compare Alameda to
Minneapolis, Minnesota which has had a multi-unit recycling commercial and multi-unit
dwelling recycling mandate since 2011, and has achieved a 36.3% recycling rate as of
2016.
The County is encouraged to consider geographically focusing on cities with low barriers like
West St. Paul, which has limited enclosure requirement, is willing to provide temporary
exemptions, does not have stringent enclosure design requirements, and is already
interested in moving toward an organized collection system. Apple Valley, Eagan, and
Lakeville are similarly situated, but are not considering organized collection and do have
strict enclosure design specifications, meaning higher construction costs. Farmington and
Hastings are already organized and considered a low priority for that reason. Burnsville is a
bit of an outlier because of loadbearing enclosure design codes. Inver Grove Heights,
Mendota Heights, and South St. Paul fall somewhere in the middle.
The County is also encouraged to implement a registration and reporting system prior to
enacting a commercial mandate so that phased implementation can be generation based.
Instead of making assumptions based on the type or size of business, or building size, the
32
While this is a strong-arm approach, the provision is suggested because all businesses are required
by law to weekly dispose of MSW. This provision is provided as a suggestion to couple recycling
requirements with hauler requirements.
May/2017
6-7
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
information reporting would go directly to the goal: high volume generators. Additionally,
the County is encouraged to begin with stand-alone buildings and not multi-unit commercial
buildings.
Model Ordinance Language
The County is encouraged to adopt the State mandate, or a version of the State mandate as
follows:
(a) Any owner or manager of a commercial building shall:
(1) contract for at least weekly collection of recyclable materials; and
(2) “commercial building” means a building that:
i. is located in Dakota County; and
ii. contains at least one business with classified in sectors 42 to 81 under
the North American Classification System.
(3) The owner or manager shall provide recycling containers in convenient
locations for residents, and adjacent to solid waste containers.
(4) The owner or manager is responsible for labelling solid waste and recycling
containers. Labels shall be of a color and size designated by the County.
(5) The owner or manager is responsible for distributing education materials to all
new residents, and to all residents annually.
(b) Any business classified in sectors 42 to 81 under the North American Classification
System shall separate recyclable materials, and store recyclable materials in
containers provided by the owner or manager.
(1) A resident need not use containers provided by the owner or manager if the
resident brings recyclable materials to a recycling center.
(c) By January 1, 2020, any owner or manager of a commercial building that generates
at least eight (8) cubic yards of solid waste per week shall comply with Section (a) of
this ordinance.
(d) By January 1, 2025, any owner or manager of a commercial building that generates
at least four (4) cubic yards of solid waste per week shall comply with Section (a) of
this ordinance.
(e) By January 1, 2020, any business classified in sectors 42 to 81 under the North
American Classification System that generates at least (8) cubic yards of solid waste
per week shall comply with Section (b) of this ordinance.
(f) By January 1, 2025, any business classified in sectors 42 to 81 under the North
American Classification System that generates at least (4) cubic yards of solid waste
per week shall comply with Section (b) of this ordinance.
(g) A licensed hauler may only provide solid waste collection services to a commercial
building, if the owner or manager also contracts for recycling services.
(h) Failure of any commercial entity with NAICS codes 42-81 to register with the County
may result in:
(1) $200 fine per month for the first offense;
(2) $500 fine per month for the second offense; and
(3) $1000 fine per month for the third offense.
The penalty provision provided above is suggested based on the success of hazardous waste
and water discharge statutes that have been very successful in reducing pollution. Those
programs typically penalize between $10,000 and $27,500 per day for permit and/or
reporting violations. Additionally, the City of Austin may fine up to $2,000 per day for
ongoing violations.
May/2017
6-8
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
6.2.5 County Funding
Consistent with policies to provide incentives, the County is encouraged to prioritize
Business Incentive Program funds to focus on multi-unit dwellings, stand-alone commercial
buildings, and high volume generators. Prioritization on such entities will increase diversion
per dollar and provide meaningful progress toward a 75% recycling rate. Implementation of
a priority based system may be phased-in, as described below in the Section 6.3.
6.3 PHASED APPROACH
To spread out the financial impacts of implementing a commercial recycling program, and to
limit barriers at early stages, the County is encouraged to adopt a phased approach to
implementation.
Figure 6.1. Phased approach to implementation of recommendations.
The County is strongly encouraged to establish an information database concurrent with
Phase I and throughout implementation. The County should monitor volume of solid waste
generated per week by business sector and adjust funding priorities based on collected
data. The County should also maintain a list of broad categories of recyclable materials
Phase I:
Identify who is in the regulated
community
Develop a registration and
information reporting system
Currently recycles
Phase II:
Prioritize technical
assistance funds to
large generators
Does not recycle
Phase II:
Work with cities to secure
temporary exemptions
from enclsoure codes
Phase II:
Prioritize enclsoure &
technical assistance funds
to large generators
Phase III:
Enact MUD mandate
Phase III:
Work with cities to
reduce enclsoure
barriers
Phase IV:
Enact commercial
mandate
May/2017
6-9
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
generated so that it can create a data set from which it might prioritize funding toward
specific materials.
For each phase, consider prioritizing implementation geographically based on identified
barriers for each city. The County may concurrently prioritize based on generator volumes
and material type i.e., recyclables or organics. The following priorities are proposed:
Table 6.1. Prioritization for implementation at each proposed phase.
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Phase IV
Phase V
Implement
registration and
information
gathering from all
businesses with
NAICS codes 42-
81.
The County may
prioritize
implementation
by:
(1) MUDs and
assisted living
(2) Stand-alone
buildings
(3) Restaurants
and catering
(4) Other large
generators
Identify which
entities do and do
not recycle.
Prioritize funding
mechanisms to
support technical
assistance and
enclosure
development at
large generator
sites.
Identify priorities
for funding
distribution
based on
information
collected from
Phase I, e.g.,
funding may go
to MUDs, then
high volume
generators, etc.
Work with cities
to secure
temporary
exemptions from
enclosure codes.
Enhance funding
mechanisms by
adopting a pay as
you throw
program or other
incentive
identified in the
2016 SERA
Report.
Prioritize technical
assistance to new
MUDs in
compliance with
mandate.
Prioritize
technical
assistance to
new commercial
entities in
compliance with
mandate
Enact a MUD
recycling mandate
for
owners/managers.
Geographically
prioritize
enclosure fund
distribution for
MUD mandate:
(1) West St. Paul,
Rosemount,
Lakeville,
Apple Valley
(2) Eagan, Inver
Grove
Heights,
Mendota
Heights
(3) South St.
Paul,
Burnsville,
Farmington,
Hastings
Enact a
commercial
recycling mandate
for
owners/managers.
Geographically
prioritize
enclosure fund
distribution for
commercial
mandate:
(1) West St. Paul,
Rosemount,
Lakeville,
Apple Valley
(2) Eagan, Inver
Grove
Heights,
Mendota
Heights
(3) South St.
Paul,
Burnsville,
Farmington,
Hastings
May/2017
6-10
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
6.4 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
In addition to the above recommendations, the County is encouraged to consider the
following:
City hauler licensing forms are inconsistent. While consistency in licensing forms may
not increase diversion, it would streamline licensing processes for haulers.
Consider consistency in State, County, city code definitions. There are a variety of
definitions for “recyclable materials.” Code definitions may be useful to measure
generator compliance with a mandate, designate material based funding priorities,
and will generate some certainty as to what may be recycled. The risk with defining
recyclable materials is that what can be recycled changes over time. Consider
defining recyclable materials as: “those materials designated by the County
Department of Environmental Resources.” The County might publish the list
annually.
Consider clarifying County and city staff roles with respect to recycling priorities
designated in Joint Powers Agreements. Wenck suggests focusing on a single priority
for at least three (3) years to allow adequate time for implementation and
evaluation.
Individual “other city” codes are too numerous and varied to be included within this
report. Reference Appendix D (Five Cities Comparison) and the supplemental
electronic information provided by Wenck for more detailed information.
If the County adopts a MUD recycling mandate, consider eliminating County
Ordinance 110, Section 15.08(K). If the County does not adopt a MUD recycling
mandate, consider revising Section 15.08(K) so that residents are offered the
opportunity to recycle, as opposed to customers.
May/2017
7-11
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory_FINAL.docx
7.0 Signature Page
Prepared by:
Sarah Braman
Environmental Scientist II
Tom Berry
Senior Planner
Toll Free: 800-472-2232 Email: wenckmp@wenck.com Web: wenck.com
Individual Bios
Sarah Braman
Sarah Braman joined Wenck Associates, Inc. as part of the real estate transaction group. As
an environmental scientist, she primarily focuses on conducting Phase I & II Environmental
Site Assessments. She has a background in plant and soil science, chemistry, hazardous
materials management, and waste management. Ms. Braman holds a Master of Science in
plant science from the University of Manitoba, Canada and a Bachelor of Arts from Gustavus
Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minnesota. Ms. Braman is also anticipated to graduate with her
J.D. from Mitchell Hamline School of Law in May 2018.
Tom Berry
Mr. Berry has nearly 20 years of experience in the areas of project planning, development and
management in both public and private sectors. He has served as project manager,
administrator and partner on many multidisciplinary projects. Years of involvement in the public
process, combined with practical program administration, and broad stakeholder experience
enables him to ask the right questions to ensure practical solutions to complex problems. He is
trained in the Systematic Development of Informed Consent (SCID) community outreach
process developed by the Institute for Participatory Management and Planning (IMPP).
Appendix A
Interview Summaries
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
APPLE VALLEY
Attendees 3/10/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Kathy Bodmer, Apple Valley planner
Ben Pierson, Apple Valley enforcement
George Dorn, Apple Valley building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
Yes. The City code requires commercial/multi-unit hauling licensees to offer recycling services
to all commercial establishments. Service to multi-unit dwellings must be provided weekly.
Enforcement is based on the hauler identifying as a commercial/multi-unit licensee.
Haulers are also required to keep enclosure areas free of debris. Haulers must also notify
property owners in containers are in disrepair, and must notify new customers of proper
container placement.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
Yes. Residents in multi-unit dwellings managed by associations or other entities must have the
same opportunity to recycle as other residents. The city interprets this to mean that
management entities are required to provide recycling to tenants. Enforcement is complaint
based.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city does not collect data from the licenses and
does not have a limit on the number of haulers licensed. The city is probably not interested in
limiting the number of haulers.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Apple Valley\Interview_Apple Valley.docx
The city does require haulers to submit monthly data, but it does not appear the city uses this
information.
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No. The city does not have a code to reflect such requirements, but acknowledges that County
ordinance provides such a requirement.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
The city does provide that failure to comply with city codes is considered a nuisance.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. While the city does require multi-unit entities to offer recycling, the city does not
specifically include this condition in its residential rental property registration requirement.
Other businesses licensed in the city do not have waste/recycling requirements in the license.
The city licenses businesses identified at the following link: http://www.ci.apple-
valley.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=170.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
It depends. The city requires either a building permit for physical structures would need a
permit under the State code, which exempts structures under 7’ in height and less than 200
square-feet. Structures requiring a building permit generally include enclosures attached to the
adjacent building, or closed top/roofed enclosures. Permit fees are based on valuation.
Generally, the city does not see a lot of enclosure permits, but would be willing to adopt a
zoning permit to cover enclosures if there is going to be an increase in construction as a result
of County initiatives. The city will likely incorporate recycling into its Comprehensive Plan. The
city has staff capacity to process increased numbers of permits.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Apple Valley\Interview_Apple Valley.docx
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code and provided calculations are
reviewed. Final site inspection includes observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that
it meets building code safety specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not
measured on site.
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable, and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, the city is willing to discuss the option of providing a temporary exemption for
enclosure requirements during an interim phase where a business is in the process of
determining how much space is needed for recycling container enclosure space.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
No. The city requires enclosures for all waste containers.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Apple Valley is a green-step city. The city generally is willing to work with the County to further
commercial recycling requirements. The city is willing to modify its multi-unit dwelling codes to
require recycling at these buildings. The city is also willing to consider requirements for
commercial recycling from businesses, but only after the County adopts a mandate. The city
expressed a need for County policy and financial support to carry-out associated activities. The
city is not interested in organized recycling and does not anticipate interest in the near future.
4
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Apple Valley\Interview_Apple Valley.docx
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
BURNSVILLE
Attendees 3/1/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Sue Bast, Burnsville Environmental Specialist/DVR recycling supervisor
Deb Garross, Burnsville planner
Jackson Becker, Burnsville Environmental Technician/DVR recycling
Chris Forslund, Burnsville building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
Yes. The City code requires commercial/multi-unit hauling licensees to offer recycling services
to all commercial establishments, and service must include all targeted recyclables. Service to
residents, which the city interprets to include multi-unit dwellings, must be provided at least
biweekly. Enforcement is based on the hauler identifying as a commercial/multi-unit licensee.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
Yes. Residents in multi-unit dwellings managed by associations or other entities must have the
same opportunity to recycle as other residents. The city interprets this to mean that
management entities are required to provide recycling to tenants. Historically, compliance
consisted of Sue Bast contacting apartment buildings and working with managers to provide
recycling services. It is not clear whether any follow up work has been done, but according to
the city almost all, if not all, multi-unit dwellings recycle.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city does not collect data from the licenses and
does not have a limit on the number of haulers licensed. And, commercial recycling collection is
exempt from the day specific hauling zones required for residential collection. The city is not
interested in limiting the number of haulers. The city does not collect data from haulers.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Burnsville\Interview_Burnsville.docx
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No; not for commercial haulers.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No. The city does not have a code to reflect such requirements, but acknowledges that County
ordinance provides such a requirement.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are few complaints but enough
related to waste such that the city is very strict about its enclosure codes. The city code
provides that failure to comply is a misdemeanor.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. While the city does require multi-unit entities to offer recycling, the city does not
specifically license multi-unit dwellings. Other businesses licensed in the city do not have
waste/recycling requirements in the license. The city licenses businesses identified at the
following link: http://www.burnsville.org/index.aspx?nid=136.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires a building permit for waste enclosures as the city code specifically
requires an accessory building, and the city requires zoning review for compliance. Accessory
buildings must have a closed top/roof with loadbearing capacity. The design must be of the
same material as the building. The city is not currently willing to provide a temporary
exemption from enclosure requirements. The city indicated it sees enclosure costs in the range
of $50k. Aesthetics are the most important value relative to enclosure requirements. The city
has enough staff to process increased numbers of enclosure permit application.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Burnsville\Interview_Burnsville.docx
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code and calculations are checked
against state code specifications. Final site inspection includes observation that an enclosure
was constructed, and that it meets building code safety specifications, however, the size of the
final enclosure space is not measured on site.
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. The city is not willing to issue waivers or temporary exemptions.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
No. The city requires enclosures for all waste containers.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Burnsville is a green-step city. The city generally is willing to work with the County to further
commercial recycling requirements. The city is not willing to require commercial recycling from
businesses, but would follow any County mandate. The city expressed a need for County policy
and financial support to carry-out associated activities. The city is not interested in organized
recycling and does not anticipate interest in the near future.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
4
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Burnsville\Interview_Burnsville.docx
The city expressed that it believes that County action will alleviate city concerns relative to city-
city competition. And, that commercial recycling needs to stem from County action. The city
also indicated that if cities are going to be working with multi-unit apartments, the technical
component is demanding and sufficient funding will be needed to effectively carryout activities.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
EAGAN
Attendees 3/1/17
Renee Burman, Dakota County
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Christina Scipioni, Eagan city clerk
Mike Ridley, Eagan planner
Mary Granley, Eagan code enforcement
Dale Schoeppner, Eagan building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
Yes. The City code requires commercial/multi-unit hauling licensees to offer recycling services
to all commercial establishments, and service must include at least two targeted recyclables.
Service to multi-unit dwellings must be provided weekly. Enforcement is based on the hauler
identifying as a commercial/multi-unit licensee.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
Yes. Residents in multi-unit dwellings managed by associations or other entities must have the
same opportunity to recycle as other residents. The city interprets this to mean that
management entities are required to provide recycling to tenants. Enforcement is complaint
based.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city does not collect data from the licenses and
does not have a limit on the number of haulers licensed. The city is probably not interested in
limiting the number of haulers. The city code requires haulers to submit data to the county.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Eagan\Interview_Eagan.docx
Haulers also designate rates on licenses which is required for residential but not commercial.
However, haulers have been reporting commercial rates. Christina Scipioni was to provide
licenses for review.
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No; not for commercial haulers.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No. The city does not have a code to reflect such requirements, but acknowledges that County
ordinance provides such a requirement. However, the city indicated that haulers have been
voluntarily reporting commercial rates.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
The city code provides that failure to comply is a misdemeanor.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. While the city does require multi-unit entities to offer recycling, the city does not
specifically license multi-unit dwellings. Other businesses licensed in the city do not have
waste/recycling requirements in the license. The city licenses businesses identified at the
following link: http://www.cityofeagan.com/city-clerk-permits.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires either a building permit or zoning permit for physical structures that do
not require a building permit. Structures requiring a building permit generally include
enclosures attached to the adjacent building, or closed top/roofed enclosures. Permit fees are
based on valuation. The city has staff capacity to process increased numbers of permits.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Eagan\Interview_Eagan.docx
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code. Final site inspection includes
observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building code safety
specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on site.
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, the city is willing to discuss the option of providing a temporary exemption for
enclosure requirements during an interim phase where a business is in the process of
determining how much space is needed for recycling container enclosure space.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
No. The city requires enclosures for all waste containers.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Eagan is a green-step city. The city generally is willing to work with the County to further
commercial recycling requirements. The city is willing to modify its multi-unit dwelling codes to
require recycling at these buildings. The city is not willing to otherwise require commercial
recycling from businesses, but would follow any County mandate. The city expressed a need for
County policy and financial support to carry-out associated activities. The city is not interested
in organized recycling and does not anticipate interest in the near future.
4
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Eagan\Interview_Eagan.docx
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
Eagan has a good relationship with its chamber of commerce and other business groups and
would be willing to facilitate introductions. The city also offered to send information to
businesses through water and utility bills, or through license renewal.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
FARMINGTON
Attendees 3/2/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Lena Larson, Farmington municipal services coordinator
Tony Wippler, Farmington planning manager
Ken Lewis, Farmington building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
Yes. The city contracts with Dick’s Sanitation and therefore requires conditions set forth therein.
The city offers Dick’s recycling services to commercial entities. The city invoices businesses for
recycling services, which pay based on use. Invoices are issued through utility bills.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
See “a.” above.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
Yes. The city hauling contract offers commercial/multi-unit recycling services to all commercial
establishments including multi-unit dwellings. The city contracts for services and invoices
businesses based on use. Invoices are issued through utility bills. All but one multi-unit dwelling
in Farmington recycle.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
No. However, all multi-unit dwellings in Farmington recycling, except for one. Businesses are
not required to recycling.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city contracts with Dick’s Sanitation for waste and recycling services, which it provides to
businesses. The city also licenses two other commercial recycling haulers: Allied and Republic.
The city requires annual hauler permitting. The city does not collect data from the licenses.
Farmington does not have a limit on the number of commercial recycling haulers licensed,
however, haulers other than Dick’s are subject to city council approval prior to permit issuance.
The city requires the regional hauler license as an attachment to the hauler permit application.
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Farmington\Interview_Farmington.docx
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No. The city invoices businesses through utility bills and based on individual use.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No. The city invoices businesses through utility bills and based on individual use.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. The city licenses businesses identified at the following link:
http://www.ci.farmington.mn.us/cms/one.aspx?pageId=3572328.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
No. The city does not have waste enclosure requirements.
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code. Final site inspection includes
observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building code safety
specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on site.
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
The city does not have waste enclosure requirements.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
The city does not have a need to issue waivers as enclosures are not required.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Farmington\Interview_Farmington.docx
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
The city does not have a need to granfather as enclosures are not required.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Farmington is a green-step city. The city is willing to work with the County to further
commercial recycling requirements. The city expressed a need for County policy and financial
support to carry-out associated activities. Currently, all but one multi-unit dwelling has
recycling services. Many but not all businesses recycle, and a few restaurants recycle organics.
Overall, Farmington does not have barriers relative to enclosures or opportunities to recycle.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
Attendees 3/1/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Michelle Tesser, Inver Grove Heights city clerk
Allan Hunting, Inver Grove Heights planner
Heather Botten, Inver Grove Heights associate planner
Frank Martin, Inver Grove Heights building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
Yes. The City code requires commercial/multi-unit hauling licensees to offer recycling services
to all commercial establishments, and service must include targeted recyclables. Service to
multi-unit dwellings must be provided weekly. Enforcement is based on the hauler identifying
as a commercial/multi-unit licensee.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
No.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city code does not require hauler reporting. The
city is not interested in limiting the number of haulers.
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Inver Grove Heights\Interview_Inver Grove Heights.docx
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No; not for commercial haulers.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
Yes. The city requires two different charges based on the size of the container.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. While the city does require multi-unit entities to offer recycling, the city does not
specifically license multi-unit dwellings. Other businesses licensed in the city do not have
waste/recycling requirements in the license. The city licenses businesses identified at the
following link: http://www.ci.inver-grove-heights.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=644.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires a building permit for enclosure development. Permit fees are based on
valuation. The city has staff capacity to process increased numbers of permits.
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code. Final site inspection includes
observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building code safety
specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on site.
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, if the container is screened but not enclosed, the city is willing to discuss the
option of providing a temporary exemption for enclosure requirements during an interim phase
where a business is in the process of determining how much space is needed for recycling
container enclosure space.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Inver Grove Heights\Interview_Inver Grove Heights.docx
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
Yes. The city does not require enclosures for existing buildings that do not have one.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Inver Grove Heights is a green-step city. The city generally is willing to work with the County to
further commercial recycling requirements. The city is willing to consider the possibility of
looking at its multi-unit dwelling codes relative to recycling requirements at these buildings.
The city expressed a need for County policy and financial support to carry-out associated
activities. The city is not willing to otherwise require commercial recycling from businesses. The
city is not interested in organized recycling and does not anticipate interest in the near future.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
Overall, Inver Grove Heights appears to have an interest in expanding residential recycling
opportunities at multi-unit dwellings, but is not apt to take a position that involves business
regulation.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
Attendees 3/1/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Cassandra, Mendota Heights/ West St. Paul/ South St. Paul
Tim Benetti, Mendota Heights community development director (not present)
Ryan Ruzek, Mendota Heights public works director
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
Yes. The City code requires commercial/multi-unit hauling licensees to offer recycling services
to all customers. Service must be provided weekly, except that comingled recyclables may be
collected every other week. Enforcement is based on the hauler identifying as a
commercial/multi-unit licensee.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
No.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city code requires haulers to submit scale receipts
to the city. The city is not interested in limiting the number of haulers.
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Mendota Heights\Interview_Mendota Heights.docx
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. The city does license multi-unit dwellings, but there are not recycling requirements in the
license form. The city licenses businesses identified at the following link: http://www.mendota-
heights.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={18B9ED66-B0DF-4DDF-B3DD-26D3BDB98A28}.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires a zoning permit for enclosure development. Permit fees are based on
valuation. The city has staff capacity to process increased numbers of permits.
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code. Final site inspection includes
observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building code safety
specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on site.
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, the city is willing to discuss the option of providing a temporary exemption for
enclosure requirements during an interim phase where a business is in the process of
determining how much space is needed for recycling container enclosure space.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Mendota Heights\Interview_Mendota Heights.docx
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
Yes. The city does not require enclosures for existing buildings that do not have one.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Mendota Heights is not a green-step city. The city generally is willing to work with the County
to further commercial recycling requirements. The city is willing to consider the possibility of
looking at its multi-unit dwelling codes relative to recycling requirements at these buildings.
The city expressed a need for County policy and financial support to carry-out associated
activities. The city is not willing to otherwise require commercial recycling from businesses. The
city is not interested in organized recycling and does not anticipate interest in the near future.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
LAKEVILLE
Attendees 3/1/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Daryl Morey, Planner
Ann Messerschmidt, Environmental resources specialist
Gene Abbott, Building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
Yes; the city limits the number of licensed haulers, but only informally at this point in time.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
No.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
Yes. Residents in multi-unit dwellings managed by associations or other entities are required to
contract for solid waste and recycling disposal. The city interprets this to mean that
management entities are required to provide recycling to tenants. Enforcement is complaint
based.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city does not collect data from the licenses and
has an informal limit on the number of haulers licensed, with six to eight currently licensed. The
city may consider reducing the number of licensed haulers in the future.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Lakeville\Interview_Lakeville.docx
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No; not for commercial haulers.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No. The city does not have a code to reflect such requirements, but acknowledges that County
ordinance provides such a requirement.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
The city code provides that failure to comply is a misdemeanor.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. While the city does license and require multi-unit entities to offer recycling, the city does
not specifically license multi-unit dwellings. Other businesses licensed in the city do not have
waste/recycling requirements in the license. The city licenses businesses identified at the
following link: http://www.ci.lakeville.mn.us/168/Licenses-Permits.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires either a building permit for enclosure construction. Permit fees are based
on valuation, and the city expressed a willingness to waive the permit fee for businesses that
need to expand or construct enclosures to add recycling services. The city has staff capacity to
process increased numbers of permits.
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code. Final site inspection includes
observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building code safety
specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on site.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Lakeville\Interview_Lakeville.docx
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, the city is willing to discuss the option of providing a temporary exemption for
enclosure requirements during an interim phase where a business is in the process of
determining how much space is needed for recycling container enclosure space.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
No. The city requires enclosures for all waste containers.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Lakeville is a green-step city. The city generally is willing to work with the County to further
commercial recycling requirements. The city is willing to modify its hauler codes to require
licensees to offer recycling services to commercial entities. The city is not willing to otherwise
require commercial recycling from businesses, but would follow any County mandate. The city
expressed a need for County policy and financial support to carry-out associated activities. The
city is not interested in organized recycling and does not anticipate interest in the near future.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
Lakeville indicated its willingness to help expand commercial recycling efforts by working with
businesses that have unique obstacles like parking space, or perimeter and set-back limits.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
ROSEMOUNT
Attendees 2/23/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Tom Schuster, Rosemount parks and recreation
Anthony Nemcek, Rosemount planner
Alan Strand, Rosemount building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No. But, city code requires haulers to keep the waste enclosure area free of debris and properly
secured.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
No. The city code does not require haulers to offer services commercial or multi-unit recycling.
However, the code does require haulers to pick-up recyclables weekly, except for single-sort
customers, which may be serviced every other week.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
No. The city does not have commercial or multi-unit recycling requirements. The city code
includes a provision that it is unlawful for “any resident, tenant, property owner, or business
owners to fail to dispose of solid waste, recyclables, and yard waste in a sanitary manner at
least once each week.” Title 5, Ch. 1, § 5-1-2 (2008). However, there is no requirement to
contract for services, and the city does not interpret the provision to require commercial or
multi-unit recycling.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city does not collect data from the licenses and
does not have a limit on the number of haulers licensed. The city is probably not interested in
limiting the number of haulers. The city code requires haulers to submit data to the county.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Rosemount\Interview_Rosemount.docx
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No. The city does not have a code to reflect such requirements, but acknowledges that County
ordinance provides such a requirement.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
The city code provides that failure to comply is a misdemeanor.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. The city licenses businesses identified at the following link:
http://www.ci.rosemount.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=429.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires either a building permit, or zoning permit for physical structures that do
not require a building permit. Structures requiring a building permit generally include
enclosures attached to the adjacent building, or closed top/roofed enclosures. Permit fees are
based on valuation. The city has staff capacity to process increased numbers of permits.
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated if submitted construction and site plan documents. Final site
inspection includes observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building
code safety specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on
site.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\Rosemount\Interview_Rosemount.docx
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, the city is willing to discuss the option of providing a temporary exemption for
enclosure requirements during an interim phase where a business is in the process of
determining how much space is needed for recycling container enclosure space.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
No. The city requires enclosures for all waste containers.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
Rosemount is a green-step city. The city is willing to work with the County to further
commercial recycling requirements. The city is less willing to consider modifications to its multi-
unit dwelling codes to require recycling at these buildings, but may consider requiring haulers
to offer such services. The city expressed a need for County policy and financial support to
carry-out associated activities. The city is not willing to otherwise require commercial recycling
from businesses, but would follow any County mandate. The city is not interested in organized
recycling and does not anticipate future interest.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
Rosemount generally notes that increased enclosure space could take up parking spaces, and
while it may be a minor issue in Rosemount, this issue might have larger impacts in other
Dakota County cities.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
SOUTH ST. PAUL
Attendees 2/22/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Cassandra, Mendota Heights/ West St. Paul/ South St. Paul
Christy Wilcox, South St. Paul licensing/ code enforcement division manager
Peter Hellegers, South St. Paul planner
Joe Heimkes, South St. Paul building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
No. However, the city is willing to consider modifications to the code to require haulers to offer
recycling services to businesses and multi-unit dwellings.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
No. However, the city is willing to consider modifications to the code to require multi-unit
dwelling management entities to provide recycling opportunities to tenants. The city has receive
some complaints from tenants relative to lack or recycling opportunities.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city does not collect data from the licenses and
does not have a limit on the number of haulers licensed. The city is probably not interested in
limiting the number of haulers. The city looked into organized recycling in the past and decided
not to move forward.
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\South St. Paul\Interview_South St. Paul.docx
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No, and the city is not interested in adding pricing requirements.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No, and the city is not interested in adding pricing requirements.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
The city code provides that failure to comply is a misdemeanor.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. The city licenses businesses identified at the following link:
http://www.southstpaul.org/index.aspx?NID=130.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires a zoning permit for fence enclosure construction. Structures requiring a
building permit generally include enclosures attached to the adjacent building, or closed
top/roofed enclosures. Permit fees are based on a flat rate of $30/permit. The city has staff
does not have capacity to process increased numbers of permits, and will need County support.
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code. Final site inspection includes
observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building code safety
specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on site.
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\South St. Paul\Interview_South St. Paul.docx
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, the city is willing to discuss the option of providing a temporary exemption for
enclosure requirements during an interim phase where a business is in the process of
determining how much space is needed for recycling container enclosure space.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
No. The city requires enclosures for all waste containers.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
South St. Paul is a green-step city, and the city council is invested in this status. The city
generally is willing to work with the County to further commercial recycling requirements. The
city is willing to modify its multi-unit dwelling codes to require recycling at these buildings. The
city is not willing to otherwise require commercial recycling from businesses, but would follow
any County mandate. The city expressed a need for County policy and financial support to
carry-out associated activities. The city is not interested in organized recycling and does not
anticipate future interest.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
South St. Paul notes that increased enclosure space could take up parking spaces, and may
impact ability to increase enclosure space. The city’s concern here is taking up more staff time
as the city is already experiencing stress on staff time.
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
-
WEST ST. PAUL
Attendees 3/2/17
Sarah Braman, Wenck Associates
Cassandra, West St. Paul/ Mendota Heights/ South St. Paul
Christine Walts, West St. Paul lead secretary and licensing
Ben Boike, West St. Paul planner
Dennis Schilling, West St. Paul building official
Waste and Recycling
Questions:
a. Do you have commercial collection requirements other than those specified in
code?
No.
b. Are there any informal collection processes required of businesses/multi-units?
No.
c. Are there any informal collection processes required of haulers?
i. Labelling dumpsters, checking materials, education, etc.
No.
d. Do you require haulers to offer commercial recycling services to businesses/multi-
units?
No, but the city is interested in evaluating organized collection.
e. Do you require businesses/multi-units to recycle?
No, but the city is open to discussing requirements for multi-unit dwelling management
associations to provide recycling services to tenants. The city does require rental housing
licensure.
f. How are hauler licenses used at the city level?
i. What functional value is gained through the licensing process?
The city requires annual hauler licensing. The city does not collect data from the licenses and
does not have a limit on the number of haulers licensed. The city is interested in limiting the
number of haulers or evaluating organized collection.
g. Do you have commercial organics recycling requirements?
i. Is there a city sanitarian or equivalent?
ii. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
The city does not have organics requirements or a sanitarian.
2
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\West St. Paul\Interview_West St. Paul.docx
h. Does the city require haulers to provide transparent or itemized invoicing to
businesses/multi-unit residents or landlords/property managers?
No.
i. Does the city have a commercial waste/recycling volume based fee structure?
No. The city does not have a code to reflect such requirements, but acknowledges that County
ordinance provides such a requirement.
j. What is the city’s enforcement policy?
The city operates enforcement on a complaint basis. There are little to no reported complaints.
The city code provides that failure to comply is a misdemeanor.
Building and Zoning
Questions:
a. Do business/multi-unit licenses include waste/recycling requirements?
i. If yes, how is compliance enforced?
ii. What businesses do not require licenses?
No. The city licenses businesses identified at the following link:
http://wspmn.gov/130/Business-License.
b. Does waste/recycling enclosure construction require a permit? (where not in
original building permit?)
Yes. The city requires either a building permit, or zoning permit for physical structures that do
not require a building permit. Structures requiring a building permit generally include
enclosures attached to the adjacent building, or closed top/roofed enclosures. Permit fees are
based on valuation. The city has staff capacity to process increased numbers of permits.
c. Tell me about your building plan review process?
i. Does it include recycling space evaluation?
Recycling space is evaluated on submitted construction and site plan documents. Recycling
space is generally evaluated based on the State building code. Final site inspection includes
observation that an enclosure was constructed, and that it meets building code safety
specifications, however, the size of the final enclosure space is not measured on site.
For multi-tenant commercial buildings, the city notes that most of the time one enclosure space
is provided for the entire building, and not individual units. A building developer may not know
who tenants are at the onset, and tenant turnover is foreseeable and therefore individualized
enclosures on multi-unit buildings are not necessarily practicable.
3
N:\Technical\1305 Dakota County\26 City Policy Research\City Information\West St. Paul\Interview_West St. Paul.docx
d. Can applicants request a waiver for recycling space enclosures?
No. However, the city is willing to discuss the option of providing a temporary exemption for
enclosure requirements during an interim phase where a business is in the process of
determining how much space is needed for recycling container enclosure space.
e. Can businesses request set-back waivers for existing buildings?
No. But, the city will work with businesses to find solutions if this becomes an issue.
f. Is there a city sanitarian?
i. What is the sanitarian’s role relative to commercial organics management?
No, the city does not have a sanitarian.
g. Does the city grandfather in enclosure spaces that do not meet city code?
No. The city requires enclosures for all waste containers, but does not actively enforce this
requirement on existing buildings.
h. Are enclosure spaces included in regular building inspections?
i. Common violations/adequate space?
ii. State law provide adequate space?
iii. Bulky waste?
iv. Modifications needed?
The city does not regularly inspect waste/recycling enclosures.
Other information:
West St. Paul is not a green-step city. The city is willing to work with the County to further
commercial recycling requirements. The city is willing to consider modifications to its multi-unit
dwelling codes to require recycling at these buildings. The city is willing to consider other
options recommended by the County. The city expressed a need for County policy and financial
support to carry-out associated activities. The city is also interested in organized recycling and
anticipates future interest.
The city fire inspector maintains a list of commercial establishments and inspects buildings on a
regular basis.
West St. Paul notes that increased enclosure space will likely take up parking spaces, but will
work with businesses to make appropriate modifications through planning and zoning action.
Appendix B
City Hauler License Forms
City of Farmington • 430 Third Street • Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 280-6800
City of Farmington
Special Waste Hauler Application for 2017
Initial Application Renewal Application
Applicant Name
Address
City, State, Zip
Phone #
Fax #
Local Representative Name
Phone #
E-Mail Address
Cellular phone #
Type of Waste to Be Hauled: construction/demolition commercial
(If you service commercial accounts, please fill out and return Supplement to Application. Commercial accounts must be formally exempted.)
Commercial Location(s) Served:
ATTACHMENTS
Copy of Regional Hauler License on file
Permit Fee $100
Signature of Applicant
Date
Name of Applicant
Title of Applicant
for City use
Approved by:
Payment:
Check #
Dates Valid
January 1, 2017
through
December 31, 2017
Permit #
City of Hastings
Application for City License
Commercial Waste Hauler License
NEW
Name of Business
Business Address
Contact
Information
Business Phone
Cell Phone
Other:
e-mail
Name of Applicant
Type of Organization
Sole Proprietorship
Corporation
Partnership
Description of
Equipment to be used
Description of Vehicle(s)
to be used
List disposal sites to be
used
Solid Waste:
Yard Waste:
Do you hold a waste
hauler license from any
other governmental unit?
Yes
No
If yes, indicate where licensed
Other Documents Needed
Completed
Data Practices Advisory
Investigation Form
Release of Information
Proof of Insurance
Workers Compensation
Receipt of Ordinance
I hereby certify that all statements made in this renewal application are true and complete and understand
that any misstatements or omissions or material facts may result in disqualification or denial of the license.
_______________________________ _________
Signature of Applicant Date
City Use
Application Received
License Fee Paid
Background Check Conducted
Background Fee Paid
City Council Approval
License Issued
City of Hastings
101 Fourth Street East
Hastings, Minnesota 55033
651-480-2350
www.ci.hastings.mn.us
City of Hastings
Application for City License
Commercial Waste Hauler License
RENEWAL
Name of Business
Business Address
Contact
Information
Business Phone
Cell Phone
Other:
e-mail
Name of Applicant
Type of Organization
Sole Proprietorship
Corporation
Partnership
Description of
Equipment to be used
Description of Vehicle(s)
to be used
List disposal sites to be
used
Solid Waste:
Yard Waste:
Do you hold a waste
hauler license from any
other governmental unit?
Yes
No
If yes, indicate where licensed
Other Documents Needed
Completed
Data Practices Advisory
Investigation Form
Release of Information
Proof of Insurance
Workers Compensation
Receipt of Ordinance
I hereby certify that all statements made in this renewal application are true and complete and understand
that any misstatements or omissions or material facts may result in disqualification or denial of the license.
_______________________________ _________
Signature of Applicant Date
City Use
Application Received
License Fee Paid
Background Check Conducted
Background Fee Paid
City Council Approval
License Issued
City of Hastings
101 Fourth Street East
Hastings, Minnesota 55033
651-480-2350
www.ci.hastings.mn.us
2017 Solid Waste Haulers
License Application
Name: __ ____
(Person, Firm or Corporation Requesting License)
Street Address: ____
City, State & Zip: ____
Business Phone: Cell Phone: ____
Equipment: ____
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Disposal Site: ____
Manner of disposal: % Landfilled (approx) % Processed (approx)
Do you offer Organic Collection for residential customers? _______ Yes ______ No
Area Serviced: ____
License(s) you are applying for: (Check all that apply and indicate the current number of Rosemount
customers). Please note: Only haulers licensed for residential collection in 2016 will be considered
for a residential haulers license in 2017.
[ ] Residential - # of customers_____________ [ ] Commercial - # of customers_______________
[ ] Construction -# of customers____________
As required by the Rosemount City Council, include the following with this application:
Proof of public liability and workers’ compensation insurance in the form of a Certificate of
Insurance for the undersigned applicant,
A list of solid waste collection equipment to be used in Rosemount,
A completed application including identification of the destination of waste collected in
Rosemount, the manner in which it will be disposed, and
Submission of the $320.00 license fee.
The undersigned hereby makes application to the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Dakota
County, Minnesota for a License to do business in the City of Rosemount pursuant to the ordinances
of said City.
Name of Firm (please print)
__________________________________
Applicant’s Signature
________________________________
Date
__________________________________
Applicant’s Name (please print)
________________________________
E mail address
For Office Use Only
LICENSE # _____ FEE ______________
INSURANCE: [ ] Liability [ ] Workers’ Compensation
November 4, 2016
Dear Waste Hauler:
Rosemount City Code Section 5.1.5 requires all solid waste haulers wishing to do business in
the City to be licensed. You are being contacted at this time because your company was
licensed in 2016. If you are planning to continue to haul in Rosemount during the coming year,
now is the time to reapply for a license. A license will permit the licensee to haul solid waste
between January 1 and December 31, 2017. Licensed haulers must comply with all of the
provisions in Section 5.1 of the Rosemount City Code. Failure to comply with these provisions
may result in the revocation of your license. A copy of the City Code can be found at
www.ci.rosemount.mn.us.
The license application form is enclosed. As required by the Rosemount City Council, the
application must include the following information:
Proof of public liability and worker’s compensation insurance in the form of a Certificate
of Insurance,
A list of solid waste collection equipment to be used in Rosemount,
A completed application, including identification of the destination of waste collected in
Rosemount and the manner in which it will be disposed, and
Submission of the $320.00 license fee.
Please be sure to indicate the type of license you are applying for (check all categories that
apply) and the number of customers in each category you currently serve in Rosemount.
Please note: Only haulers licensed for residential collection in 2016 will be allowed to obtain a
residential hauling license in 2017. Please complete all parts of the application.
The completed application and the accompanying license fee and insurance documentation
must be delivered by December 30, 2016 to Rosemount City Hall or mailed to:
Solid Waste Hauler License
2875 145
th
Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068-4997
Please note: Licenses are required of all haulers. Haulers found operating in
Rosemount without a license after January 31, 2017 will be cited and could face a
maximum fine of $500.00 and imprisonment of up to 90 days.
If you have any questions, please contact me at tom.schuster@ci.rosemount.mn.us or call me
at (651) 322-6005.
Sincerely,
Tom Schuster
Solid Waste Coordinator
Enc. License Application Form
CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL
RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL RUBBISH HAULERS LICENSE
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
PHONE:
SCHEDULE OF RATES & CHARGES
TYPE OF SERVICE:
RESIDENTIAL - WEEKLY CHARGES
BAGS
RIGID CONTAINERS
RESIDENTIAL - OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT
TRUCK YEAR & MAKE LICENSE NUMBER
RECYCLING TRAILERS:
The City of West St. Paul charges $10.00 for each additional tag, after the first one, for
licensing of rubbish trucks, roll-offs and recycling trailers.
g\pat\licenses\rubbish.frm
CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL
COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTAL RUBBISH HAULERS LICENSE FOR
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
PHONE:
SCHEDULE OF RATES & CHARGES
COMMERCIAL: CHARGES
RIGID CONTAINERS
DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT
TRUCK YEAR & MAKE LICENSE NUMBER
RECYCLING TRAILERS:
The City of West St. Paul charges $10.00 for each additional tag, after the first one, for
licensing of rubbish trucks, roll-offs and recycling trailers.
g\pat\licenses\rubbish.frm
CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL
AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION
In order for the City of West St. Paul to process your application further, you must complete and sign this
authorization. By completing and signing this authorization, you will be allowing the West St. Paul City
Clerk’s office to review information on any complaints against you, including complaints for driving
offenses, if applicable.
Private information provided or released shall be used to determine suitability for issuance of license/permit
with the City of West St. Paul. This information will be available only to you and City officials who have a
bona fide need for it. Refusal to supply required information will mean that your application cannot be
processed.
I authorize the City of West St. Paul Police Department to conduct a background investigation and release
the information to the City Clerk’s office concerning my application for a city license/permit.
I hereby authorize the City of West St. Paul to conduct a criminal history and record background
investigation so I can be considered for the below type license or permit.
Please Print
Type License or
Permit:
(Circle One)
New or Renewal?
Name of
Establishment:
Applicant’s Full
Name:
(First)
(Middle)
(Last)
Date of Birth:
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Contact Telephone:
Driver’s License
Number:
State of Issue:
______________________________________ ________________________________
(Date) (Signature)
A COPY OF YOUR DRIVER
LICENSE MUST
ACCOMPANY THIS FORM
IN ORDER TO HAVE YOUR
LICENSE PROCESSED.
Per Ordinance 1005.05 Subd. 5A: At the time of making an initial or renewal license application that requires a personal or
business background investigation, the applicant must provide written authorization to the City to investigate all facts set out
in the application and to do a personal and business background investigation on the applicant. A criminal background
investigation shall be conducted as part of a personal background investigation.
H:License forms
Place DL Here and Photo Copy
Appendix C
City Building Permit Forms
SITE PLAN REVIEW/BUILDING PERMIT AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Updated 4/11 (brown)
1
City of Apple Valley
Planning and Development Department
SITE PLAN REVIEW/BUILDING PERMIT AUTHORIZATION
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
All commercial, industrial, institutional, and multiple residential buildings must be reviewed and approved by
both the Planning Commission and City Council. The review is to assure that the site plan meets proper zoning
performance standards (setbacks, height, landscaping, parking stalls, etc.) and that the appearance of the
building meets community standards.
____ Application form and fees.
____ Exact legal description and Dakota County property identification number.
____ The following number of copies of the project plans:
____ Three (3) sets of full-sized scale drawings
____ Two (2) sets 11” x 17” reductions*
____ One (1) set of 8½” x 11” reductions*
* (An electronic PDF version on CD or flashdrive accepted in lieu of reduced drawings)
____ Signed Deposit Agreement and required escrow.
____ If the site is adjacent to a State highway, the applicant must submit two (2) complete copies of site
plans to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Mn/DOT also requires the submittal three (3) copies of
preliminary plats.
NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE DUE BY 9:00 A.M. ON DAY OF APPLICATION DEADLINE.
Project Plans
____ Site plan to include:
boundary lines of property with dimensions and area
adjacent and on-site streets (names, width)
minimum setback lines
locations of all buildings - existing and proposed
locations of all structures - existing and proposed
locations of easements and utilities
parking areas (dimensions, setbacks, # spaces)
sidewalks/trails
signage
fence and retaining walls
garbage and recycling containers
exterior HVAC and electrical equipment
____ Landscape plan to include:
basic site plan and grading information
location and identification of existing and proposed plants and/or man-made landscape elements
details of proposed planting beds and foundation plantings
SITE PLAN REVIEW/BUILDING PERMIT AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Updated 4/11 (brown)
2
delineation of both sodded and seeded areas
details of fences, tie walls, planting boxes, retaining walls, berms and other landscape details
location of landscape islands with identification of plant materials
planting schedule indicating common names, botanical names, size of plant materials, root
specifications, quantities, and special planting instructions
irrigation plan
nursery bid list that confirms the landscape materials meet or exceed 21/2 percent of the value of the
construction of the building based on Means Construction Data.
____ Drainage/Grading plan to include:
existing and proposed contours at two (2) foot intervals to 1929 sea level datum
existing and proposed building footprints with pad elevations and unit type
ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams, marshes
trees to be removed and trees to remain
location of erosion/sediment control structures
____ Building elevations to include:
scaled elevation drawings of all existing and proposed buildings and structures indicating building
materials, colors, maximum height above grade, exterior building lighting
signage
building floor plans for each story indicating gross and net leaseable square footage and/or dwelling
unit sizes and unit mixes
garbage and recycling containers
rooftop equipment
underground parking plans with stall and drive aisle dimensions
TIMELINE
Complete application must be submitted by deadline for presentation before the Planning Commission.
Staff reviews the site plan/building permit application within 10 days of receipt of the application. If the
application is not complete, staff will notify the applicant.
The proposal is placed on the agenda of a regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. The
applicant must present the proposal before the Commission. No public hearing is required. All questions
and concerns raised by the Commission must be satisfactorily answered before the Commission will make a
recommendation to the City Council. After the Commission makes a recommendation, the proposal may be
placed on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.
The City Council has 60 days to approve or deny the proposal, unless the City notifies the applicant that the
process will take longer. The City must specify how long the process will take. The City Council generally
hears and votes on the project at the same meeting.
Developer applies for a Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP) after approval of project, usually
at the time of building permit application. City Council approval may be required for an NRMP if site is 5
acres or larger; if not, staff approves NRMP administratively.
SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Updated 4/11 (white)
City of Apple Valley
Planning and Development Department
SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
A sketch plan review is an informal review by City Staff and the Planning Commission of a proposed
development project, e.g. comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, subdivision, or a
commercial/multiple-family building permit. It is reviewed at a regularly scheduled Planning
Commission meeting, and gives the Planning Commissioners an opportunity to become familiar with a
proposed project prior to a public hearing or formal action. The project developer receives feedback
from the Commissioners prior to the preparation and expense of the detailed plans that must be
submitted for formal consideration and approval. Staff strongly encourages developers to take
advantage of the sketch plan review process, especially if the development proposal is
controversial or is expected to impact neighboring property owners.
____ Meet with Planning Staff to discuss proposed project.
____ Letter to Planning Commission and City staff requesting sketch plan review (date of
regularly scheduled Commission meeting) with a brief explanation of the project, location, and
developer.
____ Copies of Sketch Plan to be included with letter:
____ Three (3) sets of full-size plans (electronic version on CD or flashdrive accepted
in lieu of full-size plans).
____ One (1) set of 11x 17” reductions*
____ One (1) set of 8 ½” x 11” reductions*
*An electronic PDF version on CD or flashdrive accepted in lieu of reduced drawings
Following Items needed for review:
____ Site plan to include:
Proposed boundary lines of property with dimensions and area
adjacent and on-site streets (names, width)
minimum setback lines
locations of all buildings - existing and proposed
locations of all structures - existing and proposed
locations of easements and utilities
parking areas (dimensions, setbacks, # spaces), including any parking ramps
sidewalks/trails
fence and retaining walls
____ Landscape plan to include:
basic site plan and grading information
SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Updated 4/11 (white)
location of existing and proposed plants and/or man-made landscape elements, including
sodded and seeded areas
location of landscape islands
____ Drainage/Grading plan to include:
existing and proposed contours at two (2) foot intervals to 1929 sea level datum
existing and proposed building footprints with pad elevations and unit type
trees to be removed and trees to remain
____ Building elevations to include:
scaled elevation drawings of existing and proposed buildings and structures indicating building
materials, colors, maximum height above grade
NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE DUE BY 9:00 A.M. ON DAY OF APPLICATION DEADLINE
Page 1 of 3
Use BLUE or BLACK Ink
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan MN 55122
Phone: (651) 675-5675
Fax: (651) 675-5694
2017 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Date: __________________ Site Address: ________________________________________________________________________
Tenant Name: _______________________________________ (Tenant is: ____ New / ____ Existing) Suite #: ___________
Former Tenant: ____________________________________
Property Owner
Name: _______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Address / City / Zip: ___________________________________________________________________
Applicant is: ____ Owner ____ Contractor
Type of Work
Description of work: __________________________________________________________________
Construction Cost: ____________________
Contractor
Name: ___________________________________________ License #: __________________________
Address: _________________________________________ City: _______________________________
State: _________ Zip: _________________ Phone: _________________________________________
Contact: __________________________ Email: _____________________________________________
Architect/Engineer
Name: ___________________________________________ Registration #: ______________________
Address: ________________________________________ City: _______________________________
State: _________ Zip: _________________ Phone: __________________________
Contact Person: __________________________ Email: _______________________________________
Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: __________________________ Phone #: _________________________
NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of
the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to
conclude that they are trade secrets.
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage.
Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org
I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and
codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a
permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans.
x_________________________________________ x_________________________________________
Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature
For Office Use
Permit #: _____________________
Permit Fee: ___________________
Date Received: ________________
Staff: ________________________
Page 2 of 3
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
SUB TYPES
Foundation
Public Facility
Exterior Alteration–Apartments
Commercial / Industrial
Accessory Building
Exterior AlterationCommercial
Apartments
Greenhouse / Tent
Exterior AlterationPublic Facility
Miscellaneous
Antennae
WORK TYPES
New
Interior Improvement
Siding
Demolish Building*
Addition
Exterior Improvement
Reroof
Demolish Interior
Alteration
Repair
Windows
Demolish Foundation
Replace
Water Damage
Fire Repair
Retaining Wall
Salon Owner Change
*Demolition of entire building give PCA handout to applicant
DESCRIPTION
Valuation
Occupancy
MCES System
Plan Review
Code Edition
SAC Units
(25%___ 100%___)
Zoning
City Water
Census Code
Stories
Booster Pump
# of Units
Square Feet
PRV
# of Buildings
Length
Fire Sprinklers
Type of Construction
Width
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Footings (New Building)
Final / C.O. Required
Footings (Deck)
Final / No C.O. Required
Footings (Addition)
Other: ______________________
Foundation ____Foundation Before Backfill
Pool: ___Footings ___Air/Gas Tests ___Final
Drain Tile
Siding: ___Stucco Lath ___Stone Lath ___Brick ___ EFIS
Roof: ___Decking ___Insulation ___Ice & Water ___Final
Retaining Wall
Framing ____ 30 Minutes ____ 1 Hour
Erosion Control
Fireplace: ___Rough In ___Air Test ___Final
Concrete Entrance Apron
Insulation
Meter Size: ____________
Sheetrock
Electronic Plans Required
Windows
Final C/O Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: ____Yes ____No
Reviewed By: ____________________________, Planning New Business to Eagan: ______________________
Reviewed By: ____________________________, Building Inspector
FEES
Water Quality
Base Fee
Storm Sewer Trunk
Surcharge
Sewer Trunk
Plan Review
Water Trunk
MCES SAC
Street Lateral
City SAC
Street
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Water Lateral
Treatment Plant
Other: ______________________
Treatment Plant (Irrigation)
Park Dedication
Trail Dedication
TOTAL:
Page 3 of 3
(651) 675-5675
buildinginspections@cityofeagan.com
COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
Plumbing, Electrical, HVAC/Mechanical and Fire Suppression plans are required to be submitted with
their respective permit applications.
Foundation Only
2 sets of scaled Structural Plans
2 sets of Civil Plans
1 Certificate of Survey
1 Code Analysis **
1 Project Specs
1 Special Inspection & Testing Schedule **
1 Soils Report
Meter size must be establishedif applicable
Met Council SAC Determination (651) 602-1000
Interior Improvement
Electronic copies of the final approved plan,
submitted via email, CD or flash drive
Project Narrative, including a description of the
company operation and maximum number of
employees on the primary shift
2 sets of scaled Architectural Plans
(maximum plan size =< 24” x 36”)
1 Code Analysis
1 Project Specs
1 Key Plan
1 Master Exit Plan
1 Energy Calculations complying with the 2015
Commercial Energy Code (Chapter 1323 of the
MSBC) ****
Fire Stopping Submittals
Meter size must be established if applicable
Met Council SAC Determination (651) 602-1000
New Building AND Additions
Electronic copies of the final approved plan,
submitted via email, CD or flash drive
Project Narrative, including a description of the
company operation and maximum number of
employees on the primary shift
1 Soils Report
1 Certificate of Survey
2 sets of scaled Structural Plans
2 sets of scaled Architectural Plans
o HVAC units required on building elevation /
site plan
2 sets of Civil Plans
2 sets of Landscaping Plans
1 Code Analysis **
1 Energy Calculations complying with the 2015
Commercial Energy Code (Chapter 1323 of the
MSBC) ****
1 Emergency Response Site Plan ***
1 Special Inspection & Testing Schedule **
1 Project Specs
1 Master Exit Plan
Fire Stopping Submittals
Meter Size must be established
Met Council SAC Determination (651) 602-1000
* Call MN Dept of Health at (651) 201-4500 for details regarding food & beverage or lodging facilities.
** Contact Building Inspections for a sample.
*** Permit for new building or addition will not be processed without Emergency Response Site Plan.
**** 2015 Energy Code Compliance Forms are available at www.cityofeagan.com/buildinginspections. You will need the
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 90.1 – 2010 to complete the compliance forms.
COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT PROCEDURES
MANUAL
Permit Requirements
Outline Code Review
Erosion Control Criteria
Building Permit Application
Plan Review & Permit Process Review
Fee Schedules
Special Structural Testing & Inspection Program Summary Schedule
Multi-line Telephone System / 9-1-1 Legislation Compliance Flow Chart
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
PURPOSE AND NEED
To ensure compliance with the Burnsville Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, the State Building Code,
State Fire Code, and other City Code requirements, a building permit must be issued prior to any construction in
the City of Burnsville.
POLICY
The City of Burnsville, in order to ensure compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances requires that
building permits are issued prior to construction within the city limits and that inspections be made prior to the
issuance of Certificates of Occupancy according to the following procedures.
PROCEDURE
COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT AND ADDITION REQUIREMENTS
1) City Planning and Engineering Department approvals of plans
2) State Board of Health Approval (if required) – (651) 643-3425
3) Metro SAC Letter submittals require SAC Determination Application - enclosed
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
390 Robert St. N
St. Paul MN 55101-1805
SAC Technician (651) 602-1421
(SAC Determination Application electronically
www.metrocouncil.org/environment/ratesbilling/SAC_FAQs.htm)
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
The Dairy and Food Inspection Division
625 Robert Street North
St. Paul, MN 55155-2538
Food Inspector/Metro 651-201-6027
www.mda.state.mn.us/news/publications/food/business&marketing/planreview packet.pdf
4) Fire Marshal Approval
5) Survey – up-to-date and signed by Registered Land Surveyor
6) Grading, Drainage & Landscaping plans – (curb & gutter – per Council approval)
7) Erosion Control plan (approved, implemented and inspected)
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
8) Erosion Control Security - $1,500.00 per acre or portion thereof.
The first $3,000.00 of this financial security shall be a cash deposit with the City, the remainder of
which to be an approved letter of credit. If at any time during the course of the work the cash
deposit amount falls below the original amount, the applicant shall make another deposit in the
amount necessary to restore this cash deposit to the original amount within seven (7) days, after
notification by the City, the City may:
(1) Withhold the scheduling of inspections and /or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
(2) Revoke any permit issued by the City to the applicant for the site in question and any other of the
applicant’s sites within the City’s jurisdiction.
(3) Draw on the applicant’s alternate security.
9) Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow for:
Landscaping – 100% of contract
Bituminous surfacing, curb & gutter – 100% of contract
10) Soil Report – from approved testing agency.
11) Signed utility plans (by Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota) approved by the Engineering
Department.
12) Energy calculations.
13) Water/Sewer connection charges (per SAC unit).
14) Signed architect & structural plans (2 hard sets & 1 electronic copy) – [by Structural Engineer licensed
in the State of Minnesota].
**Please label each sheet on the electronic copy by sheet name; i.e.A1.1, A1.2, S1.1, etc….
15) Special Structural Testing and Inspection Agreement.
16) Signed Plumbing plans (2 sets).
17) Signed HVAC plans (2 sets.
18) Signed Fire Sprinkler plans (2 sets).
19) Signed Electrical plans (2 sets).
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
20) Impervious Surface Worksheet completed (if site is in a shoreland district [within 1,000 feet of a lake or
river].
21) Wetland delineation and report and wetland/lakeshore/river buffer plan if site has these features
present.
22) A permit shall not be issued until after a complete plan review has been made. All necessary additions,
alterations, and corrections of plans must be on file. Time involved in issuing a permit varies,
depending upon complete, corrected plans, size of project and workload of the Inspection Division
23) Plans for a new building over 15 sheets, requires that all architectural, structural and mechanical plans
be submitted in disk form using:
File name.pdf
Adobe Acrobat
24) If exterior signage is proposed a sign plan showing the location of all existing and proposed signage on
the site and on the building(s) including sign specifications, dimensions, and number and if multi-tenant
building, the owner’s plan for tenant signage.
Date (For City Use Only)
Site Address Permit No.
Owner: Name Permit Fee
Address Plan Check Fee
State Surcharge
City State Fixture Charge
Zip Tele. Total Fee
Fax: E-mail: REQUIRED
Total Construction Valuation (exc.land) $
Prior to Building Permits being issued, PROJECT VALUATIONS
Letters of Credit are required for the following: Plumbing $
Erosion Control ($1,500.00 Per Acre, or $3,000.00 Cash &
LOC for remainder if more than 2 acres) ____________ Heating $
Landscaping $ Electrical $
Bituminous Surfacing $ General Const . $
Concrete Curbing/Gutter $ Total Const. Value $
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
CONTRACTORS
Bldr: Name Htg: Name
Address Address
City State City State
Zip Tele Zip Tele
Contact Name & Phone: Contact Name & Phone:
Fax: E-mail:
Plbg: Name Elec: Name
Address Address
City State City State
Zip Tele Zip Tele
Contact Name & Phone: Contact Name & Phone:
Application for Commercial Building Permit
NEW CONSTRUCTION & REMODEL
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS
Name Name
Address Address
City State City State
Zip Tele Zip Tele
Contact Name & Phone: Contact Name & Phone:
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
Indicate type of construction
Will building be sprinkled?
Dimensions: X = sq. ft. Basement
X = sq. ft. 1
st
floor
X = sq. ft. 2
nd
floor
X = sq. ft. 2
nd
floor
Total Sq. Ft. =
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS
Description of intended building uses – (includes all portion of building)
Total number of occupants: No. 1
st
floor
No. 2
nd
floor Others
SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE (S.A.C.) DETERMINATION
Acreage of Property
Gross Area of Structure
Net Useable/Leasable Area
Total S.A.C. Units
I hereby certify that the above information is correct and agree to comply with the City of Burnsville
Ordinances and State of Minnesota Laws regulating building construction.
Signature
Owner Contractor Architect
***PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING***
1. The Planning Department must review plans in order to verify the planned use for this space
is permitted in that zoning district. * Review the trash enclosure detail.
2. Copy of a letter from the building owner describing in detail the type of use intended for the
space. Also, describe the use of spaces adjacent to the space in question. This letter is to be
signed by both the building owner and the tenant.
3. Signed architectural & structural plans (2 hard sets & 1 electronic) with Building Permit
Application
4. Signed plumbing plans (2 sets) with Building Permit Application
[designed & signed by plumbing contractor]
5. Signed HVAC plans (2 sets) with Building Permit Application
[designed & signed by heating contractor]
6. Signed electrical plans (2 sets) with Building Permit Application
[designed & signed by electrical contractor, displaying emergency & exit lighting]
7. Signed sprinkler plans & fire alarm system plans (2 sets) with Building Permit Application
[designed & signed by sprinkler contractor] – MUST be reviewed by Fire Dept. Inspector
8. Plans submitted for approval: State Board of Health (651) 643-3425
[required if food will be consumed on site i.e. Restaurant, Deli, Catering Services]
9. Plans submitted for approval: State Department of Agriculture ( 651) 201-6000
[required if food is sold but not consumed on site i.e. Grocery, Bakery, etc.]
10. Metro SAC letter required before building permit will be issued. Plans submitted to:
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - SAC Technician (651) 602-1421
390 Robert St. N Fax (651) 602-1477
St. Paul, MN 55101-1805
COMMERCIAL TENANT
BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
CHECKLIST
SAC Determination Application, attached or www.metrocouncil.org/environment/RatesBilling/RatesCharges.htm#SAC
REQUIRED: One electronic copy (preferred) or one paper copy of each of the following items must be
submitted with this application.
1. Full written scope of the project submitted to owner.
2. Shop drawings/section view of new installation system, including structural components of the existing roof.
3. A listing (name) of each specific manufacturer’s product being installed.
4. The flame spread documentation for any foam products being installed.
5. The thickness of all products being installed.
6. The fire tested assembly number designation. (U.L. Factory Mutual, ICC)
7. Any documentation from a Minnesota registered structural engineer.
8. Copy of the manufacturer’s installation instructions.
PLEASE ANS
W
ER
THE
F
O
LL
OW
I
N
G
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
NS
1. Are all the existing roofing materials being removed to the structural deck? Yes No
2.
How many sq. feet is the existing roof?
How many sq. feet are being replaced?
________
3. What type of roofing system currently exits? Built-up Membrane Other
4. What type of roofing system is proposed? Built-up Membrane Other
5. Will the new roofing materials reduce or increase the current dead load?
Increase Reduce No Change
6. If loading is to be increased, has a structural engineer been hired to review all allowable loads?
If yes, attach an Engineer’s report Yes No
7. Are any new drainage devices being added or altered as part of the re-roof? Yes No
8. Per International Building Code Table 1501.1 what class designation is the new roof system?
A B Non-classified
9. What overall R-value will the new roof produce? _________________
11. Per International Building Code Sections 2603.4, 2603.4.1, and 2603.4.1.5, will a thermal barrier
be required as part of the re-roofing project? Yes No
11. Will any electrical, plumbing, gas or mechanical items on the existing roof need to be disconnected and
reconnected as part of the re-roof? Yes No
12. Are any electrical, plumbing, gas or mechanical items being replaced in conjunction with the re-roof?
COMMERCIAL ROOF
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
Permit Release Check List
NAME OF PROJECT ___________________________________ _____ DATE ___________
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL Yes______ No ________ N/A______
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL Yes______ No ________ N/A______
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Yes______ No ________ N/A______
NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Yes______ No ________ N/A______
District (1,000 ft. from a lake/river); if wetland is on/adjacent to site
STATE BOARD OF HEALTH APPROVAL Yes______ No ________ N/A______
FIRE MARSHALL APPROVAL Yes______ No ________
ENGINEERING DEPT REQUIREMENTS:
Right of Way Permit Yes _______ No_______ N/A _____ AMOUNT ____ _
Vacation of Easement Needed Yes__No___ PAPER WORK FILED Yes______ No ________
Development Contract Signed: Yes______ No ________ N/A______
Development Contract Fees: Yes ___ No ___ N/A_____AMOUNT_____________
LID Agreement Filed Yes______ No ________ N/A______
Storm Water Pond Agreement Filed Yes______ No ________ N/A______
Easement Documents Filed Yes______ No ________ N/A______
Public Infrastructure Yes ___ No _ N/A______ AMOUNT ___ _
Erosion Control Inspection Completed: Yes______ No ________ N/A______
Certification for wireless tower/equipment on city site: Yes______ No ________ N/A______
Lease for wireless tower/equipment on city site: Yes______ No ________ N/A______
PLANNING DEPT REQUIREMENTS:
PUD/CUP/IUP Agreement Signed Yes_______ No _______
PUD/CUP Conditions of Approval Met Yes_______ No _______
Final Plat Filed with Dakota County Yes_______ No _______
Certification for Cell Tower Yes_______ No________
Site Plan Review Fee paid (if project does not have an escrow account) Yes_____ No ______ N/A______
Or Escrow Balance Needed Yes _____No________ AMOUNT ____
Tree Protection Letter of Credit Yes_____ No___ N/A ____ AMOUNT ____
Tree Removal Permit Yes _____No ___NA/ ____ AMOUNT _____
Landscape Cost Estimate Yes_____ No___N/A_____AMOUNT ______
Landscape security paid: Yes_____ No___N/A_____AMOUNT ______
BUILDING DEPT REQUIREMENTS:
Letter of Credit – Yard Lawn/Turf Landscaping Yes_____ No___ N/A ____ AMOUNT
Bituminous Surface Yes_____ No___ N/A ____ AMOUNT______
Curb & Gutter Yes_____ No___ N/A ____ AMOUNT______
Erosion Control Security Yes_____ No___ N/A ____ AMOUNT______
COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT
CHECK LIST
_____1. City Planning, Engineering (and Natural Resources Department if site has wetlands, lakes, river) approvals of the
plans.
_____2. State Board of Health Approval (if required) -651-643-3425
1. Percolation Test
2. Private Sewage system design.
3. Pool & filtration plans & specs.
4. Kitchen, restroom plans & specs.
5. Public building plans (hospitals, schools, libraries, etc).
6. Restaurant plans.
____3. Metro SAC letter
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
390 Robert Street N
St. Paul, Mn 55101-1805
SAC Technician 651-602-1421
_____4. Fire Marshall Approval.
_____5. Survey; up-to-date and signed by Registered Land Surveyor.
_____6. Wetland delineation plan and report if wetlands are present on site.
_____7. Erosion Control Plan (approved, implemented and inspected).
_____8. Erosion Control Security - $1500.00 per acre or portion thereof.
The first $3,000.00 of this financial security shall be a cash deposit with the City, the remainder of which is to be an
approved letter of credit. If at any time during the course of the work, the cash deposit amount falls below the
original amount, the applicant shall make another deposit in the amount necessary to restore this cash deposit to the
original amount within seven (7) days, after notification by the City.
The City may:
1. Withhold the scheduling of inspections and/or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
2. Revoke any permit issued by the City to the applicant for the site in question and any other of the applicant’s
sites within the City’s jurisdiction.
3. Draw on the applicant’s alternative security.
_____9. Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow (if applicable)
Landscaping 100% of contract
Bituminous surfacing, curb & gutter 100% of contract
_____10. Special Inspection Agreement
_____11. Soil test from approved testing agency
_____12. Signed Utility Plans (by Engineer licensed in the State of MN), approved by Engineering Dept.
_____13. Energy Calculations.
_____14. Water Connection Charges (per sac).
_____15. Signed architect & structural plans (2 hard sets & 1 electronic).
_____16 Signed plumbing plans (2 sets).
_____17. Signed HVAC plans (2 sets).
_____18. Signed sprinkler plans. (2 sets).
_____19. Signed electrical plans (2 sets).
_____20. If trees are present on site a tree inventory, survey and Woodland Evaluation Worksheets will be required and a
tree protection letter of credit must be provided before any trees are removed from the site.
_____21. If new rooftop or other mechanical equipment, ducts, vents, gutters, etc., are proposed to be installed at the site it is
required to be screened. Contact the Planning Department at 952-895-4455 for specific requirements.
_____22. If exterior lighting is proposed a plan showing the location and type of all proposed fixtures, illumination levels on
site and at the property line(s), light pole height and hooded fixture details are required.
_____23. If exterior signage is proposed a sign plan showing the location of all existing and proposed signage on the site and
on the building(s) including sign specifications, dimensions, and number.
G:comm./permit check list/front of folder.
Page 1 of 3
Use BLUE or BLACK Ink
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan MN 55122
Phone: (651) 675-5675
Fax: (651) 675-5694
2017 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Date: __________________ Site Address: ________________________________________________________________________
Tenant Name: _______________________________________ (Tenant is: ____ New / ____ Existing) Suite #: ___________
Former Tenant: ____________________________________
Property Owner
Name: _______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Address / City / Zip: ___________________________________________________________________
Applicant is: ____ Owner ____ Contractor
Type of Work
Description of work: __________________________________________________________________
Construction Cost: ____________________
Contractor
Name: ___________________________________________ License #: __________________________
Address: _________________________________________ City: _______________________________
State: _________ Zip: _________________ Phone: _________________________________________
Contact: __________________________ Email: _____________________________________________
Architect/Engineer
Name: ___________________________________________ Registration #: ______________________
Address: ________________________________________ City: _______________________________
State: _________ Zip: _________________ Phone: __________________________
Contact Person: __________________________ Email: _______________________________________
Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: __________________________ Phone #: _________________________
NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of
the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to
conclude that they are trade secrets.
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage.
Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org
I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and
codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a
permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans.
x_________________________________________ x_________________________________________
Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature
For Office Use
Permit #: _____________________
Permit Fee: ___________________
Date Received: ________________
Staff: ________________________
Page 2 of 3
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
SUB TYPES
Foundation
Public Facility
Exterior Alteration–Apartments
Commercial / Industrial
Accessory Building
Exterior AlterationCommercial
Apartments
Greenhouse / Tent
Exterior AlterationPublic Facility
Miscellaneous
Antennae
WORK TYPES
New
Interior Improvement
Siding
Demolish Building*
Addition
Exterior Improvement
Reroof
Demolish Interior
Alteration
Repair
Windows
Demolish Foundation
Replace
Water Damage
Fire Repair
Retaining Wall
Salon Owner Change
*Demolition of entire building give PCA handout to applicant
DESCRIPTION
Valuation
Occupancy
MCES System
Plan Review
Code Edition
SAC Units
(25%___ 100%___)
Zoning
City Water
Census Code
Stories
Booster Pump
# of Units
Square Feet
PRV
# of Buildings
Length
Fire Sprinklers
Type of Construction
Width
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Footings (New Building)
Final / C.O. Required
Footings (Deck)
Final / No C.O. Required
Footings (Addition)
Other: ______________________
Foundation ____Foundation Before Backfill
Pool: ___Footings ___Air/Gas Tests ___Final
Drain Tile
Siding: ___Stucco Lath ___Stone Lath ___Brick ___ EFIS
Roof: ___Decking ___Insulation ___Ice & Water ___Final
Retaining Wall
Framing ____ 30 Minutes ____ 1 Hour
Erosion Control
Fireplace: ___Rough In ___Air Test ___Final
Concrete Entrance Apron
Insulation
Meter Size: ____________
Sheetrock
Electronic Plans Required
Windows
Final C/O Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: ____Yes ____No
Reviewed By: ____________________________, Planning New Business to Eagan: ______________________
Reviewed By: ____________________________, Building Inspector
FEES
Water Quality
Base Fee
Storm Sewer Trunk
Surcharge
Sewer Trunk
Plan Review
Water Trunk
MCES SAC
Street Lateral
City SAC
Street
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Water Lateral
Treatment Plant
Other: ______________________
Treatment Plant (Irrigation)
Park Dedication
Trail Dedication
TOTAL:
Page 3 of 3
(651) 675-5675
buildinginspections@cityofeagan.com
COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
Plumbing, Electrical, HVAC/Mechanical and Fire Suppression plans are required to be submitted with
their respective permit applications.
Foundation Only
2 sets of scaled Structural Plans
2 sets of Civil Plans
1 Certificate of Survey
1 Code Analysis **
1 Project Specs
1 Special Inspection & Testing Schedule **
1 Soils Report
Meter size must be establishedif applicable
Met Council SAC Determination (651) 602-1000
Interior Improvement
Electronic copies of the final approved plan,
submitted via email, CD or flash drive
Project Narrative, including a description of the
company operation and maximum number of
employees on the primary shift
2 sets of scaled Architectural Plans
(maximum plan size =< 24” x 36”)
1 Code Analysis
1 Project Specs
1 Key Plan
1 Master Exit Plan
1 Energy Calculations complying with the 2015
Commercial Energy Code (Chapter 1323 of the
MSBC) ****
Fire Stopping Submittals
Meter size must be established if applicable
Met Council SAC Determination (651) 602-1000
New Building AND Additions
Electronic copies of the final approved plan,
submitted via email, CD or flash drive
Project Narrative, including a description of the
company operation and maximum number of
employees on the primary shift
1 Soils Report
1 Certificate of Survey
2 sets of scaled Structural Plans
2 sets of scaled Architectural Plans
o HVAC units required on building elevation /
site plan
2 sets of Civil Plans
2 sets of Landscaping Plans
1 Code Analysis **
1 Energy Calculations complying with the 2015
Commercial Energy Code (Chapter 1323 of the
MSBC) ****
1 Emergency Response Site Plan ***
1 Special Inspection & Testing Schedule **
1 Project Specs
1 Master Exit Plan
Fire Stopping Submittals
Meter Size must be established
Met Council SAC Determination (651) 602-1000
* Call MN Dept of Health at (651) 201-4500 for details regarding food & beverage or lodging facilities.
** Contact Building Inspections for a sample.
*** Permit for new building or addition will not be processed without Emergency Response Site Plan.
**** 2015 Energy Code Compliance Forms are available at www.cityofeagan.com/buildinginspections. You will need the
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 90.1 – 2010 to complete the compliance forms.
City of
Farmington
430 Third St., Farmington , MN 55024
651-280-6840 Fax 651-280-6839
Application For
Building Permit
Commercial/Industrial
Date_____________________ Permit No._____________________
Site Address
Legal Description
_____________________________________________________________________________
Lot________ Block_________ Addition____________________________________________
Property Owner
Name/Company ____________________________________ Phone No. _________________
Address _____________________________________________________________________
City __________________________________ State ________ Zip ___________________
Contractor
Company _________________________________________ Phone No. ________________
Contractor License No.: ________________________ Expiration Date __________________
Address ______________________________________Phone No:________________________
City ___________________________________ State ________ Zip __________________
Sewer and Water
Contractor
Company ________________________________________________ Phone No.
______________
Contractor License No.: ___________________________________ Expiration
Date_____________
Description of Project Est. Value of Project
Current/Proposed Use of Building____________________________________________________________________
The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of the law, for the purpose of including the City of Farmington to the action herein
requested, that all statements are true, and that all work herein will be done in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Farmington and the State
of Minnesota. I HEREBY AGREE THAT THE FINAL GRADES RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION, ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BUILDING
PERMIT, CONFORM WITH THE GRADING PLAN OF THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT. BUILDER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
PROPERLY GRADING THE LOT TO AVOID PONDING OR DRAINAGE PROBLEMS OCCURING ON THIS OR ADJACENT LOTS.
Applicants Signature_____________________________________________________ Date__________________
Bldg Permit Type:
- SFD
- Duplex
- Res. Multi.
- Commercial
- Industrial
- Institutional
- Public
- Garage
- Pool
- Move
- Other Structure
- Deck
- Porch
- Demo. Res.
- Demo. Non.Res.
- Other
Work Type:
- New
- Remodel/Alt.
- Addition
- Repair
- Interior. Finish
- Reside
- Reroof
This permit shall be null and void if authorized work is not started within 180 days or if work
is suspended or abandoned for 180 days or more after work is started.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Office Use
Required Inspections
- Footing
- Foundation
- Framing
- Insulation
- Sheet Rock
- Final
- Re-Roof
98 Other
_________________
Office Use
Census Code:
New
101 - 1 Fam. Res.
102 - 1 Fam. Attached
103 - 2 Fam. (Duplex)
104 - 3&4 Family
105 - 5 or more Family
213 - Hotel/Motel
New
214 - Other Shelter
318 - Amusement/Rec.
319 - Place of Worship
320 - Industrial
321 - Non Res. Garage
322 - Service Station
323 - Hosp./Institution
New
324 - Office/Bank
325 - Utilities
326 - Schools/Ed.
327 - Retail/Rest.
328 - Other Nonres.
329 - Nonbldg
434 - Alt./Add/ Res.
437 - Alt./Add. Nonres.
438 - Alt./Add. Res. Gar.
645 - Demo 1-Fam.
646 - Demo 2-Fam.
647 - Demo 3&4 Fam.
648 - Demo 5 or more
649 - Demo Other
Description
Cost per
Square
Foot
Square
Feet
Value
OFFICE USE
ONLY
1st Floor
Bldg. Permit
Fee
$__________
2nd Floor
Plan/Site
Check Fee
$____________
Sq. Ft. per Floor Above
2nd
State
Surcharge
Fee
$____________
Basement
S.A.C. Fee
$____________
Garage
WAC
$____________
Deck
Other
$____________
Other
Total Fee’s
$____________
TOTAL
Application Approved By:
__________________________________ Date_________________________
City Planner/Zoning
Permit Approved:
__________________________________ Date________________________
Building Official/Inspector
Grading Plan Approved:
__________________________________ Date_________________________
Engineering
Fire Code Compliance:
__________________________________ Date_________________________
Fire Marshal
I:build\Building\Applications\APPLBL.DOC 10/24/08
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING A COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT
(This list should serve as a checklist for permit applicant)
Each application shall be accompanied by 4 sets of the following scaled plans containing the following
information. The applicant is urged to consult the applicable codes with the City Engineer, Planner, Building
Official and Fire Chief before submitting the final set of plans.
1. Registered Survey (signed by Minnesota Licensed Land Surveyor)
2. Site Plan
a. Landscaping
b. Parking lot, Driveways, Fire Lanes
c. Grading 2 contours existing and proposed
d. Building Locations
e. Building Elevations 1
st
floor, garage, basement
f. Fence Locations and descriptions, if applicable
g. Sign Locations and Descriptions, if applicable
h. Off Street Loading, if applicable
i. Fire Lanes
3. Utilities Plan
a. Water Service domestic, sprinkling, hydrants
b. Sanitary Sewer Services
c. Storm Sewer
4. Outdoor Lighting Plan
5. Construction Plans and Specifications
a. Civil
b. Architectural
c. Structural
d. Mechanical
e. Fire Sprinkler System
f. Plumbing
g. Geotechnical Report
6. Water Permit Application
7. Sewer Permit Application
8. Fire Alarm Permit/Plan
It will be the responsibility of the owner/contractor to submit plans to the Metropolitan Council for SAC
determination and to the Minnesota Department of Public Health for plumbing plan approval. No
permits will be issued without approval from these agencies.
SAC Determinations
Restaurant /Food
Plumbing
Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services
390 Robert Street N.
St. Paul, MN 55101-1626
651-602-1000
http://www.metrocouncil.org/Wastewater-
Water/Funding-Finance/Rates-
Charges/Sewer-Availability-Charge.aspx
Minnesota Department of Health
Environmental Health Section
PO Box 64975
St. Paul, MN 55164-0975
651-201-4500
http://www.health.state.mn.us
Minnesota Department of
Labor and Industry
Public Health Engineer
Plumbing Plan Review &
Inspections Unit
443 Lafayette Rd
St. Paul, MN 55155-434
651-284-5005
www.dli.mn.gov
Please contact the Building Official at (651) 280-6833 with any questions.
2007 Minnesota State Building Code
Project Final Inspection Checklist Worksheet
For Building Certificate of Occupancy
Synopsis of Required “Final” Inspections
1. The final fire alarm system testing and inspection must be scheduled with the installing contractor and the City
Building Inspector. In some instances, the local Fire Marshal may also want to be present. The system
installation however, is under the jurisdiction of the City Building Inspector. The installing contractor is
responsible for installing and subsequently testing the entire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72 and the
State Building Code. A final alarm system installation certification form must then be completed, signed and
submitted to the City Building Inspector for final approval.
2. The final fire sprinkler system testing and inspection must be scheduled with the installing contractor and the
City Building Inspector. In some instances, the State Fire Marshal and/or the local Fire Marshal may also want to
be present. The system installation however, is under the jurisdiction of the City Building Inspector. The
installing contractor is responsible for installing and subsequently testing the entire fire sprinkler system in
accordance with NFPA 13 and the State Building Code. At the final inspection, the fire sprinkler system flow
alarm will be tested to verify that it is tied into an automatic phone-dialer system that will send a flow-alarm
signal to an approved monitoring firm. The installing contractor must also complete and submit a final fire
sprinkler system installation certification form to the City Building Inspector for final approval.
3. The final fire sprinkler system fire-pump start-up/operational test and final inspection must be scheduled with the
installing contractor and the City Building Inspector. In some instances, the State Fire Marshal and/or the local
Fire Marshal may also want to be present. The system installation however, is under the jurisdiction of the City
Building Inspector. The installing contractor is responsible for installing and subsequently testing the entire fire-
pump system in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 20, and the State Building and Fire Code. The installing
contractor must complete and submit a final fire-pump operation certification form to the City Building Inspector
for final approval.
4. The final emergency generator system start-up/operational test and final inspection must be scheduled with the
installing contractor and the City Building Inspector. In some instances, the State Electrical Inspector, the State
Fire Marshal and/or the local Fire Marshal may also want to be present. The system installation however, is
under the jurisdiction of the City Building Inspector. The installing contractor is responsible for installing and
subsequently testing the generator system in accordance with the State Electrical Code, NFPA 110, NFPA 111,
and the State Building Code.
5. Class I kitchen hoods must be operationally tested by the installing contractor/building mechanical contractor
and witnessed by the City Building Inspector. Operational tests may include, but are not limited to: building
power system shutdown to verify hood operation under fire suppression alarm conditions, smoke ventilation
tests, grease duct pressure tests, power interconnection tests with required MAU, etc. The kitchen hood fire
suppression inspection/installation is under the jurisdiction of the City Building Inspector. The installing
contractor is responsible for installing and subsequently testing the kitchen hood fire suppression system in
accordance with MN Rule 1346, NFPA 96, and the State Building and Mechanical Codes. The fire suppression
system installing contractor must also complete and submit a final system installation certification form to the
City Building Inspector for final approval.
6. A final MDH health inspection must be completed on any public kitchen and/or food preparation area. This
inspection must be scheduled with, and subsequently approved by, a Minnesota Department of Health
Sanitarian, or the local health department sanitarian. This inspection must be completed and approved prior to
occupancy and/or use of the kitchen and any food preparation area. A copy of the final health inspection
approval must be provided to the City Building Inspector prior to the final occupancy inspection of the building.
7. Every elevator, elevator equipment/control room, LULA lift, escalator, moving sidewalk, or chair lift must be
inspected and approved by a CCLD State Elevator Inspector prior it being placed into operation and prior to the
final building occupancy inspection. The installing contractor is responsible for scheduling all required elevator
inspections with the CCLD Elevator Inspector(s).
8. All high-pressure-piping [HPP] piping over 15 PSIG, all ammonia piping systems, all HPP/high-temp piping
systems over 250 Degrees/30PSI, and all high-pressure boiler system installations must be inspected by the
CCLD State High-Pressure-Piping Inspectors and/or a State Boiler Inspector - or their approved designate. The
installing contractor is responsible for scheduling all required inspections for this equipment. Written
verification of required final inspection(s) approval must be made available to the City Building Inspector before
final occupancy inspection of the building. Copies of all boiler equipment start-up reports must be submitted to
the City Building Inspector prior to the final building inspection.
9. A final electrical inspection is required on all interior and exterior electrical system installation for the project.
The installing contractor is responsible for scheduling all required electrical inspections. The final electrical
inspection must be completed and approved by the assigned State or local Electrical Inspector. Written
verification of required final inspection(s) approval must be made available to the City Building Inspector before
final occupancy inspection of the building.
10. A final plumbing inspection is required on all interior and exterior plumbing system installations. The installing
contractor is responsible for scheduling all required plumbing inspections with the Plumbing Inspector/City
Building Inspector. The final plumbing inspection must be completed and approved by the Plumbing
Inspector/City Building Inspector. Written verification of required final inspection(s) approval must be made
available to the City Building Inspector prior to final inspection of the building. Final plumbing inspection(s) may
include requirements for: hydrostatic testing of water services, air tests on exterior sanitary and/or storm sewer
piping, chlorination and subsequent flushing and bacterial testing of exterior water distribution systems, interior
monometer testing, RPZ testing, potable water distribution system testing and subsequent chlorination and
bacterial testing. (Also see items 18, 19, 20, and 21 for further requirements.) The installing contractor is
responsible for scheduling all required inspections with the Plumbing Inspector/City Building Inspector. Written
verification of required final inspection(s) and required test result(s) must be made available to the City Building
Inspector before final inspection of the building.
11. A final HVAC/mechanical system inspection is required on all interior and/or exterior building mechanical
systems. The installing contractor is responsible for scheduling this inspection with the City Building Inspector.
Final HVAC/mechanical system inspection(s) may include requirements for: hydrostatic testing of building
service piping, gas line air tests, smoke and/or fire damper actuation testing and inspection, smoke control
system operational testing and inspection, fuel burning equipment start-up or air handling equipment operational
testing and inspection, etc. (See items 12, 13, 14, and 18 for further requirements.) Written verification of
required final inspection(s) (and required equipment test results) must be made available to the City Building
Inspector before a final inspection of the building.
12. Final fuel-burning equipment start-up inspection, testing, and certifications must be completed for each piece of
fuel-fired equipment in the building. The installing contractor is responsible for completing and submitting final
equipment start-up certificates/results (which may include requirements for ORSAT testing and/or equipment
balancing) for each piece of equipment. Written verification of required final inspection(s) (and required test
results) must be made available to the City Building Inspector before final inspection of the building.
13. A final HVAC equipment balancing report must be submitted for the buildings’ HVAC air handling system and all
hydronic equipment. The installing contractor is responsible for scheduling and completing this testing. Final
balancing reports and/or test results must be submitted to the City Building Inspector prior to final
HVAC/Mechanical system inspection and prior to the final occupancy inspection of the building.
14. Final mechanical/HVAC and electrical systems “Acceptance Testing” must be completed by either a third party
testing agency or by the project Mechanical and Electrical Engineer(s). All new mechanical/electrical equipment
for this project is to be tested and adjusted for verification of proper functionality and performance and to ensure
that all control elements are calibrated and in proper working condition, and that all components, equipment,
systems, and interfaces between systems, conform to the construction documents and the Minnesota Energy
Code. A letter of final verification evidencing such conditions must be submitted to the City Building Inspector
prior to final inspection of the building.
15. PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT PROJECTS ONLY – When contract work exceeds $500,000.00 in construction
valuation, a mechanical system “COMMISSIONING REPORT” must be completed by the installing contractor, the
mechanical engineer, and/or a third party testing agency. A copy of the final commissioning report must be
submitted to the City Building Inspector within one-year of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the
project.
16. A final fire code and life safety inspection must be scheduled with the local Fire Marshal (if one exists). The
general contractor/construction manager is responsible for scheduling required life-safety inspections for this
project. This inspection must be scheduled when the building and grounds are substantially complete, but
before the final occupancy inspection by the City Building Inspector.
17. A final Special Inspection & Testing Summary report must be completed and submitted to the City Building
Inspector once all required special inspections are done for the project. The final summary report must
essentially state that all required special inspections/testing have been completed, tested, and/or inspected as
required by the code and by the structural engineer and/or architect of record. It must also contain language to
verify that said inspections and test results meet the building code and the project specification requirements.
This report must be submitted to the City Building Inspector as soon as possible, but at a minimum, before the
final occupancy inspection of the building.
18. All miscellaneous gas piping, medical gas piping, process piping, hydronic piping, plumbing piping, and other
mechanical equipment piping must be pressure tested (and witnessed/verified by the appropriate state inspector)
prior to the final occupancy inspection of the building. Written verification of required piping pressure tests
must be made available to the City Building Inspector before final occupancy inspection of the building. A copy
of the third party medical gas test/inspection must also be made available to the City Building Inspector prior to
final inspection of the building.
19. All exterior utilities must be final tested/inspected by the Plumbing Inspector or the City Building Inspector.
Some of these tests/inspections include: Hydrostatic pressure testing, chlorination, flushing, bacterial water
testing, air pressure tests on sanitary and storm sewer pipes, etc. The installing contractor is responsible for
scheduling of all required inspections and/or tests for these items. All systems/equipment must be inspected
and approved by the Plumbing Inspector or City Building Inspector prior to final inspection of the building. A
copy of the domestic water line bug test results must be submitted to the City Building Inspector prior to final
building inspection.
20. Every septic system must be inspected and approved by the local authority prior to the final occupancy
inspection of the building. It is the responsibility of the installing contractor to schedule and obtain all required
septic system inspections with the local authority prior to the final occupancy inspection of the building. A copy
of the final septic system inspection report and as-built drawing must be submitted to the City Building Inspector
once complete.
21. Every water-well must be inspected during its installation by the local authority and/or a State Well Inspector.
The well installer is responsible for scheduling all required well inspections. A final water sample test must be
completed prior to final occupancy inspection to verify water quality. A copy of the final water test report must
be submitted to the City Building Inspector prior to final occupancy inspection of the building.
22. If the building project is a state licensed facility (e.g., hospital, nursing home, SLF, correctional facility, hospice,
group home, etc.) the project must be final inspected and approved by the appropriate licensing agency of
Minnesota. This final licensing inspection must be completed after the final occupancy inspection approval by
the City Building Inspector. It is the responsibility of the general contractor and/or construction manager to
schedule all required state agency final inspections for necessary licensing.
23. A final “zoning inspection” is required. It is the responsibility of the general contractor and/or construction
manager to schedule all required local/jurisdictional final zoning inspections once complete. These inspections
must be completed and approved - prior to the final occupancy inspection by the City Building Inspector.
24. OTHER REQUIRED INSPECTIONS – As noted by the City Building Inspector, other required final inspections may
be necessary. Verify potential “other” inspections with the City Building Inspector ASAP.
25. The final occupancy inspection must be completed prior to moving any furnishings into the building. It must
also be completed and approved prior to occupancy of the building. All aforementioned final inspections must
be completed and approved as outlined herein - prior to scheduling the final occupancy inspection. It is the
responsibility of the general contractor and/or the construction manager to schedule the final building
occupancy inspection. This inspection is under the jurisdiction of the City Building Inspector. Upon successful
completion of this inspection, a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued. Building occupancy and use may then
occur. Note that no change in use or occupancy of the building or facility may occur without the issuance of a
new Certificate of Occupancy by the City Building Department.
Questions or comments regarding required final inspections, test reporting, or
final submittals should be directed to the appropriate City Inspector or the
City Building Official. Call 651-280-6833 with questions.
Project:_____________________________________________ Permit No.____________________
All above must be checked/completed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. No furnishings may be placed within the building and
no person shall occupy the building until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the City Building Official in accordance with MSBC
1300.0220.
Required
Inspection
Date
completed
Final Inspection Checklist Worksheet
Type of final inspection/verification required
1
Final fire alarm system inspection by City Building Inspector.
(Final NFPA 72 installation certification form submittal required from installing contractor.)
2
Final fire sprinkler system testing and inspection by City Building Inspector. Auto-phone-
dialer/monitoring system fully established.
(Final NFPA 13 installation certification form submittal required from
installing contractor.)
3
Final fire sprinkler system fire-pump start-up inspection by City Building Inspector. (Final NFPA 13
and NFPA 20 installation and start-up certification form submittal required from installing contractor.)
4
Final emergency generator start-up and operational inspection by state electrical and/or City
Building Inspector.
(A final start-up and installation certification letter must be submitted by the installing contractor.)
5
Final class I kitchen hood operational inspection by City Building Inspector. (Final NFPA 96 installation
and testing certification letter must be submitted to the City Building Inspector - by hood fire protection contractor.)
6
Final kitchen and/or food prep area sanitary health inspection. (A copy of the final sanitarian/health inspection
report must be submitted to the City Building Inspector.)
7
Final elevator, LULA lift, escalator, or moving walk inspection by CCLD Elevator Inspectors.
8
Final high-pressure-piping, ammonia system piping and/or boiler inspection completed by the
appropriate CCLD State or Insurance Inspector.
(A copy of the final boiler start-up reports must be submitted to the
City Building Inspector for final inspection.)
9
Final electrical inspection by State Electrical Inspector.
10
Final plumbing inspection by CCLD State Plumbing Inspector or City Inspector.
11
Final Mechanical/HVAC inspection by City Building Inspector.
12
Final fuel-burning-equipment start-up inspection, testing, and certification completed by the
installing contractor(s).
(Final inspection/start-up forms are required for each piece of fuel burning equipment – to be
submitted by the installing contractors – at final mechanical/HVAC inspection.)
13
Final balancing report is required for each piece of mechanical equipment and/or the entire new
HVAC system.
(A final balancing report must be submitted prior to – or at – the final project mechanical inspection.)
14
Final mechanical/HVAC and electrical systems “Acceptance Testing” letter from either a third
party testing agency - or from the project Mechanical and Electrical Engineer(s) is required to be
submitted for final inspection (per the energy code). (
All new mechanical/electrical equipment for this project
must be tested and adjusted for verification of proper functionality and performance to ensure that all control elements are calibrated
and in proper working condition, and that all components, equipment, systems, and interfaces between systems, conform to the
construction documents and the energy code. A letter of verification evidencing such conditions is required for final inspection.)
15
Final HVAC System “Commissioning” for Public School District Buildings. (A final mechanical system
commissioning inspection must be completed within 1-year of the final building inspection for all public school building projects - in
accordance with State Statute. A copy of this report must be submitted to the City Building Inspector upon completion.)
16
Final Fire Code and Life Safety Inspection completed by the appropriate State and/or local Fire
Marshal – prior to occupancy of the building.
17
Final Special Inspection & Testing Summary report completed and submitted to City Building
Inspector.
(From each respective project special inspection and testing agency.)
18
All gas piping, process piping, medical gas piping, mechanical equipment piping, plumbing
piping, etc. - pressure tested and approved by the appropriate third party and/or the City
Inspector.
(A final medical gas piping inspection/approval report must be submitted by the respective third party inspection
agency.)
19
Exterior site utilities final tested, inspected, sanitized, flushed, and approved - by the State
Plumbing Inspector or City Building Inspector.
(An H
2
0 bug test result/report must be submitted to the City Building
Inspector for final inspection.)
20
Final septic system inspection is required by the local building/zoning/engineering department.
21
Final well inspection by local zoning and/or State MDH Well Inspector required.
22
Final MDH or DOC inspection for special state licensed facilities (i.e., hospitals, nursing homes,
SLF’s, correctional facilities, etc.) must be completed by the appropriate state agency inspector.
23
Final local zoning inspection approval – by the local zoning administrator.
24
OTHER REQUIRED INSP:_____________________________________________________________
25
Final building Inspection for the Certificate of Occupancy - by the City Building Inspector. (All
previously listed inspections and/or required paperwork must be completed and submitted to the City Building Inspector prior to
scheduling this inspection. The C of O will not be issued until all necessary paperwork has been submitted.)
Owner Name: Site Address: ________________________________
Address: Legal Description:_____________________________
City/State: Zip: ___________________________________________
Phone: Fax: ____________ Year Structure Built: ____________________
Contractor: Architect/Engineer: _____________________________________
Address: Address:_____________________________________
City/State: Zip: City/State: Zip: _______________
Contact: Contact: ___________________________________
Phone: Fax: Phone: Fax: ____________
Class of Work (check one):
new construction addition remodel alteration Other
Description of Work: ______________________________________________________
Valuation (including labor): ____________________
Construction Data:
Setbacks Dwelling (sq. ft.) sq. ft. (sq. ft.)
Front Finished Basement Garage Shed ____
Right Side Unfinished basement Porch Other_____
Left Side 1st Floor Deck No. of fireplaces ____
Rear 2nd Floor Height ___________
The undersigned acknowledges that he/she has read this application and the above information is correct and accurate. Applicant also
understands by signing this application that he/she could be held responsible as representative of this project for any violation of
compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances of the City of Hastings.
___________________
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent Date
NOTICE: This is an application only. Permit will be issued after City approval and payment of fees.
***********************************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY*******************************************
App Accepted by Date Zoning ____
Bldg Approval Cont Lic # Erosion Control ____
Plan Approval Occupancy Sprinklered Y N
Eng. Approval Type of Const ______
F.M. Approval # of Stories ________
Approval to Issue by: Special Conditions:__________________________
Date Approved
Building Permit Application
Department of Building Safety
101 4
th
Street East, Hastings, MN 55033
p. 651-480-2342 f. 651-437-1654
www.hastingsmn.gov
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST FOR
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND MULT-UNIT RESIDENTIAL
APPLICANT: PHONE #:
PLEASE PRINT
One (1) Completed and signed Building Permit application provided by the City of Hastings
Two (2) Copies of Architectural plans signed by Minnesota Licensed Architect with Building Code
Analysis information.
Two (2) Copies of Minnesota certified Structural plans
Two (2) Copies of Minnesota Civil plans prepared and signed by a registered Professional Engineer
including site, grading and utility plans.
Three (3) Copies of the Certificate of Survey prepared by a Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor
Two (2) Landscaping, grading, drainage plan(s).
One (1) Exterior Energy envelope worksheet demonstrating compliance with the Energy Code.
One (1) Certified Soil testing report from a third party testing company.
One (1) Special inspection agreement from the Certified Architect.
One (1) Copy of the Metropolitan Council Service Availability.Charge. unit determination letter.
Contact Metropolitan Council.
Separate review and individual permit approvals required for Sewer/water, plumbing, mechanical,
fire suppression and electrical prior to commencing work. The following plans must be submitted at
time of perspective permit application:
Two (2) Sanitary Sewer/watermain/storm sewer plans
Two (2) Plumbing certified plans
Two (2) Mechanical certified plans
Two (2) Fire suppression certified plans
Two (2) Electrical certified plans
As part of the permit review and approval process, all applicants applying for a permit are required to submit
all the above necessary information which is needed to support their request for a permit. If the applicant does
not submit all the above required supporting information at the time of application, the application is
incomplete and may not be accepted into the review process. Incomplete applications will only extend the
review period. In order to minimize the period for review and permit approval, it is very important that your
application is complete and all the required supporting documentation is attached.
Department of Building Safety
101 4
th
Street East, Hastings, MN 55033
p. 651-480-2342 f. 651-437-1654
www.hastingsmn.gov
Site Plan Checklist
The City of Hastings looks forward to assisting you with your development plans! The
following checklist has been established to provide guidance on the development process.
Please contact the Community Development Department at (651) 480-2350 with any
questions.
1. Concept Plan Review: Optional
Initial review of plans prior to submittal of an application. Allows for cursory review prior to
payment of fees and drafting of detailed plans. Submittal of hard copy or pdf plans are
acceptable. Concept Plans are reviewed by the Community Development, Public Works,
Building, Fire, and Parks Departments as part of the Development Review Committee
(DRC). DRC meetings are generally held at 10:30 am on Tuesdays at the Public
Works Facility located at 1225 Progress Drive (not City Hall). Those submitting plans
are welcome to attend. DRC comments will be emailed to plan submitters by the end of the
week.
Concept Plan submittal should consist of the following:
Existing Condition - location and dimensions of property, existing buildings, parking,
streets, trees, general topography.
Proposed Conditionlocation of building and parking areas, stormwater infrastructure
areas, utility access and layout, and general grading.
The more detailed the plans, the more detailed the review.
There is generally no charge for the initial review of plans by the DRC; however the City
may require establishment of a payment escrow for more substantial reviews and projects.
A payment escrow or application will be required for further review upon delivery of the
initial plan comments by the DRC.
2. Site Plan Application Submittal
Electronic (pdf) submittals only; paper copies are not needed. Please see the attached
Land Use Application and Planning Commission Action Deadline sheet for payment,
submittal deadline, and timeline information.
The following information is required:
a) Site Plan Drawing
b) Civil Infrastructure Site Plans - (in accordance with Civil Site Plan Review Checklist
for Single Site Non-residential Development/Redevelopment)
Projects interfacing with or constructing public infrastructure are required to
follow design standards Public Works Design Manual and the City’s Standard
Specifications for Infrastructure Construction.
c) Landscape Plan
d) Photometric Plan
e) Colored Architectural Elevations
The following information may be required as determined by City Staff:
a) Neighborhood Meeting to introduce the project to neighbors prior to the Planning
Commission hearing.
b) City Council Committee Meeting.
c) Heritage Preservation Commission Review (historic structures\districts only)
d) Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) or an Alternative Urban Areawide
Review (AUAR)
e) Traffic Study
f) Wetland Delineation
Please see City Code Chapter 154 Subdivision Regulations,
City Code Chapter 155
Zoning Code, and Public Works Department Resources or further information.
3. Completeness\Initial Review
City Staff will conduct a review of the application for completeness within one week of
submittal. The applicant will be notified of any incomplete information. Complete
applications will be scheduled for DRC Review.
4. DRC Review (Tuesdays 10:30am)
Complete applications will be scheduled for the Development Review Committee (DRC).
Plans are reviewed by the Community Development, Public Works, Building, Fire, and
Parks Departments. DRC meetings are generally held at 10:30 am on Tuesdays at the
Public Works Facility located at 1225 Progress Drive (not City Hall). Those submitting
plans are welcome to attend. DRC comments will be emailed to plan submitters by the end
of the week. All significant comments must be addressed prior to scheduling review before
the Planning Commission.
5. Planning Commission Meeting – (2
nd
& 4
th
Mondays each month7:00pm)
A public hearing is held before the Planning Commission, a citizen advisory board
appointed by the City Council. A City Staff Memo containing a review of the request is
prepared during the week before the meeting. Meetings are held in the City Hall Council
Chambers located at 101 East 4
th
Street. All applicants are strongly encouraged to
attend the meeting. Meetings include:
Staff presentation of the request
• Public comments
Questions for applicant
Recommendation Applications recommended for approval or denial will be placed
on the following City Council agenda. The Commission may table an item to request
further information.
6. City Council Meeting – (1
st
and 3
rd
Mondays each month 7:00pm)
Recommendations from the Planning Commission are forwarded to the City Council for final
approval. A City Staff Memo containing a review of the request is prepared during the week
before the meeting. Meetings are held in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 101
East 4
th
Street. All applicants are strongly encouraged to attend the meeting.
7. Final Infrastructure Plan Approval
Final approval of the Civil Infrastructure Site Plan by the Public Works Department. A
development agreement, maintenance agreement, and utility agreement may be required to
document project requirements and expectations.
8. Final Building Permit Approval
Final approval of the building structure plans by the Building Department. Release of the
building permit may be required to occur simultaneously with approval of the Civil
Infrastructure Plan by the Public Works Department.
9. Schedule Preconstruction Meeting
A Preconstruction meeting may be scheduled upon approval of all plans. This meeting shall
be coordinated by the developer’s project management team with the Public Works
Department and shall take place ahead of any construction activities.
10. Construction
The construction start date will be determined at the Preconstruction meeting. Construction
inspection escrow deposit and security for public infrastructure improvements meeting City
Ordinance requirements must be provided prior to commencement of construction.
CONTACT INFORMATION
John Hinzman
Comm. Dev. Dir.
(651) 480-2378
Jhinzman@hastingsmn.gov
Justin Fortney
City Planner
(651) 480-2381
Jfortney@hastingsmn.gov
Nick Egger
Public Works Dir.
(651) 480-2370
nickegger@hastingsmn.gov
Ryan Stempski
City Engineer
(651) 480-2368
rstempski@hastingsmn.gov
John Caven
Assistant City Eng.
(651) 480-2369
Jcaven@hastingsmn.gov
Tom Bakken
Building Official
(651) 480-2375
Tbakken@hastingsmn.gov
John Townsend
Asst. Fire & EMS Dir
(651) 480-6153
Jtownsend@hastingsmn.gov
Al Storlie
Fire Marshal
(651) 480-6155
astorlie@hastingsmn.gov
Chris Jenkins
Parks Director
(651) 480-6176
Cjenkins@hastingsmn.gov
City of Hastings
Community Development Department
Land Use Application
Address or PID of Property: ___________________________________________________________
Applicant Name: _______________________ Property Owner: ________________________
Address: ______________________________ Address: _______________________________
_______________________________________ ________________________________________
Phone: ________________________________ Phone: _________________________________
Fax: __________________________________ Fax: ____________________________________
Email: ________________________________ Email: __________________________________
Description of Request: ________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
If requesting site plan review of multi-family units (three or more attached), are the units intended to be
for sale or rental units? ___________________________________________________
Check Applicable Line(s) Please Note: All Fees and Escrows are due at time of application.
___ Rezone $500 ___ Minor Subdivision $500
___ Final Plat $600 ___ Special Use Permit $500
___ Variance $250 ___ Comp Plan Amend. $500
___ Vacation $400 ___ Lot Split/Lot Line Adj. $50
___ House Move $500 ___ Annexation $500 plus legal expenses
___ Prelim Plat $500 + escrow ___ EAW $500 + $1,000 escrow
___ Site Plan $500 + escrow ___ Interim Use Permit $500
Total Amount Due: $ _____________ Make checks payable to City of Hastings.
Credit cards also accepted.
Please ensure that all copies of required documents are attached.
_______________________________________ _____________________________________
Applicant Signature Date Owner Signature Date
_______________________________________ _____________________________________
Applicant Name and Title Please Print Owner Name Please Print
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File # ____________________ Rec’d By: ____________________ Date Rec’d: __________________
Fee Paid: _________________ Receipt # ____________________ App. Complete _______________
LAND USE APPLICATION CITY OF HASTINGS
Community Development
101 4
th
St E, Hastings, MN 55033 ~ Phone: 651.480.2350 ~ Fax: 651.437.7082
Supplemental Information
Escrow Requirements.
Escrow fees are in addition to application fees to cover additional Staff time and consultant reviews.
Additional amounts may be required if the project requires extensive review. Unused escrow funds are
refunded back to the applicant upon completion of the project or when a construction escrow is
established.
Preliminary Plat:
Under 10 Acres $3,500
10 Acres and Over $6,500
Site Plan Review Residential
8 units and under $2,000
9 40 units $3,250
41 units and greater $4,500
Site Plan Review Commercial/Industrial
0 5,000 s.f. bldg $2,000
5,001 10,000 s.f. bldg $3,000
10,001 50,000 s.f. bldg $3,750
50,001 s.f. + bldg $4,500
Required Submittals:
For Site Plan and Plats:
Plans must be submitted electronically in PDF format.
If you are unsure as to what you need to submit, please consult with the Community Development
Department.
City of Hastings
Planning Commission\City Council
Action Deadlines
2016
Application City Council
Submittal Planning City Council 2
nd
Read
Deadline** Commission Approval** (Rezone only)
Thursday 2
nd
& 4
th
Mon 1
st
& 3
rd
Mon 1
st
& 3
rd
Mon
November 19, 2015 December 14, 2015 December 21, 2015 January 4
December 3, 2015 December 28, 2015 January 4 January 19*
December 17, 2015 January 11 January 19* February 1
December 31, 2015 January 25 February 1 February 16*
January 14 February 8 February 16* March 7
January 28 February 22 March 7 March 21
February 18 March 14 March 21 April 4
March 3 March 28 April 4 April 18
March 17 April 11 April 18 May 2
March 31 April 25 May 2 May 16
April 14 May 9 May 16 June 6
April 28 May 23 June 6 June 20
May 19 June 13 June 20 July 5*
June 2 June 27 July 5* July 18
June 16 July 11 July 18 August 1
June 30 July 25 August 1 August 15
July 14 August 8 August 15 September 6*
July 18 August 22 September 6* September 19
August 18 September 12 September 19 October 3
September 1 September 26 October 3 October 17
September 15 October 10 October 17 November 7
September 29 October 24 November 7 November 21
October 20 November 14 November 21 December 5
November 3 November 28 December 5 December 19
November 17 December 12 December 19 January 3, 2017*
December 1 December 27* January 3, 2017* January 17, 2017*
December 15 January 9, 2017 January 17, 2017* February 6, 2017
December 29 January 23, 2017 February 6, 2017 February 21, 2017*
* Holiday Schedule – Generally meeting will be held on Tuesday, instead of Monday.
Submission dates not a Thursday. Please verify date with City Hall.
** Applications submitted will be evaluated for completeness within one week.
Complete applications will then be scheduled for the corresponding date as indicated on
the chart. Incomplete or outstanding items noted in the Planning Commission Staff
Report may delay City Council action on the item until issues are resolved to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director
Address of Property Involved:
________________________________________________________________
Owner Name: Contractor/ Agent:__________________________________
Address:
Address: _________________________________________
City/State:
Zip: City/State: Zip: _____________
Phone:
Fax: Phone: Fax: _____________
Contact email (optional)_______________________________________
SHED
Size:
FENCE
Height: _______
SITE PLAN: (Site plan must show proposed location of new shed/fence/deck
and setbacks from property lines. Identify on site plan all other structures and distances to
each.
For ease of illustrating site plan go to:
http://gis.co.dakota.mn.us/DCGIS/ and enter house number to view property lines and map
Type: ________
DECK/PLATFORM
Height cannot be more
than 30” above grade and
not attached to a structure with
frost footings. (Unless a building
permit is issued)
Setbacks:
Front ________
L
eft Side
Right Side
Rear _________
Further Restrictions:
Any fence, plantings, or other landscape improvements installed within a drainage and/ or utility easement are subject to removal as
necessary for the inspection, installation, repair, maintenance, access or removal of public utilities and/or drainage improvements. The
property owner shall be responsible at their expense for both the removal and reinstallation of any improvements.
There may be private covenants on the subject property that place further restrictions on construction than City Ordinance that you
acknowledge do not apply or have been met by your proposal.
X______________________________________________________________
Signature of Property Owner Date
The undersigned acknowledges that he/she has read this application and the above information is correct and accurate. Applicant also
understands by signing this application that he/she could be held responsible as representative of this project for any violation of compliance
with all applicable laws and ordinances of the City of Hastings.
X
__________________
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent Date
NOTICE: This is an application only
. Permit will be issued after payment of fees and City approval.
***********************************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY*******************************************
Rec’d By: ______________-____-20____ Fee: $________ Receipt # ___________ File # ____________ Approved by_______________
N:mapsdocs.Appforms.2
014 apps.
Co
mmunity Development
101 4
th
Street East, Hastings, MN 55033
p. 651-480-2381 f. 651-437-1654
www.hastingsmn.gov
Zoning Permit Application
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
CONSTRUCTION
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
20195 HOLYOKE AVENUE
LAKEVILLE, MN 55044
952-985-4440
www.ci.lakeville.mn.us
Office Use Only
___________________
Permit Number
___________________
Received By
___________________
Date Received
___________________
Fee Total
JOB SITE ADDRESS: __________________________________________SUITE# __________________
SITE BUSINESS NAME: _________________________________________________________________
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT _____ BLOCK_____ SUBDIVISION: ______________________________
APPLICANT: _______________________________ EMAIL: ____________________________________
OFFICE PHONE: ________________CELL PHONE: ___________________FAX: ___________________
STREET ADDRESS: ___________________________CITY:_______________ ST: _____ZIP: _________
CONTRACTOR: ____________________________ EMAIL: ____________________________________
OFFICE PHONE: ________________CELL PHONE: ___________________FAX: ___________________
STREET ADDRESS: ___________________________CITY:_______________ ST: _____ZIP: _________
ARCHITECT: ____________________________________ LICENSE#: _____________
CIVIL ENGINEER: ________________________________ LICENSE#: _____________
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ________________________ LICENSE#: _____________
MECHANICAL ENGINEER: ________________________ LICENSE#: _____________
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: _________________________ LICENSE#: _____________
VALUATION OF WORK (excluding land): ____________________ SQUARE FOOT ________________
IS BUILDING SPRINKLED? _________________________ STANDPIPES? _______________________
I HEREBY APPLY FOR A BUILDING PERMIT AND I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE INFORMATION
ABOVE IS COMPLETE AND ACCURATE; THAT THE WORK WILL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH
THE ORDINANCES AND CODES OF THE CITY AND WITH THE STATE BUILDING CODE, THAT I
UNDERSTAND THIS IS NOT A PERMIT AND WORK IS NOT TO START WITHOUT A PERMIT
AND THAT THE WORK WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN.
NAME OF APPLICANT (Please Print) _____
APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE: ___________________________________DATE: __________________
$0.00
PROPOSED USE (Describe in Detail):
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 2
OFFICE USE ONLY
BUILDING PERMIT TYPE: CODE INFORMATION
Apartment Building (50)
Commercial Bldg – New (80)
Commercial Bldg – Add/Remodel (81)
Industrial Bldg – New (85)
Industrial Bldg – Add/Remodel (86)
Tax Exempt Bldg – Add/Remodel (89)
Tax Exempt Bldg – New (90)
Commercial Re-roof/Reside (82/83)
Retaining Wall (63)
Buildings Moved (94)
Buildings Demolished (95)
Footing/Foundation Only (96)
Grading (98)
Miscellaneous (98)
VALUATION: $ REQUIRED INSPECTIONS:
PERMIT FEES: FOOTING (61)
PERMIT FEE: $ FOUNDATION (67)
PLAN CHECK $ FRAMING (62)
STATE SURCHARGE $ INSULATION (63)
M.C.E.S. SAC UNIT (___) $ FIREPLACE (68)
WATERMAIN UNIT (___) $ SITE (71)
SANITARY SEWER UNIT (___) $ OTHER (70)
SANITARY SAC UNIT (___) $ BUILDING FINAL (65)
ESCROWS $
OTHER $
TOTAL FEES: $
APPROVALS:
PLANNING or CED DIRECTOR: DATE:
CITY ENGR or ASSIST CITY ENGR: DATE:
FIRE MARSHAL: DATE
BUILDING OFFICIAL: DATE:
IBC Occupancy Group
Type of Construction
Fire Suppression System
Zoning District
Code Edition
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
COMMENTS:
C:\Users\bklausler\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\ALT1R0BE\2015 Commercial checklist.docx
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT SUBMITTALS
REVISED 8/6/15
SITE ADDRESS: ________________________________________________________
APPLICANT: ___________________________________PHONE #: ______________
PLEASE PRINT
Check appropriate box
ONE copy of signed and completed Building permit application form
FOUR copies of Architectural certified plans
FOUR copies of Structural certified plans
FOUR copies of Civil certified plans including site survey, grading and utility plans
FOUR copies of Landscaping certified plans
ONE Specification book
ONE copy each of compliance forms complying with State of Minnesota amended
2012 IECC or ASHRAE 90.1-2010 including:
Building Envelope compliance form, and
HVAC mandatory provisions compliance form, and
Service water heating compliance form, and
Lighting compliance form, or
Energy cost budget (ECB) compliance report if used
ONE Code analysis on plans or separate sheet
ONE Soil test report
ONE Special inspection agreement signed by all parties
ONE Copy of letter from Metropolitan Council on number of SAC units
Separate review and individual permit approvals required for Sewer/water,
plumbing, mechanical, fire suppression and electrical prior to commencing work. The
following plans must be submitted at time of perspective permit application:
TWO Sanitary Sewer/watermain/storm sewer plans
TWO Plumbing certified plans
TWO Mechanical HVAC certified plans
TWO Fire suppression certified plans
TWO Electrical certified plans
The above submittals constitute a complete application for a Building Permit for a new
commercial, industrial, or multi-unit residential building. (MSBC 1300.0130). Only complete
applications will be accepted at the counter for the permit review process. The plans and
submitted documents will be reviewed within 10 working days from receipt of the complete
application. If the submitted documents are not accurate or additional information is required,
delays in the approval process may occur. You will be contacted when the plan review and fee
calculation has been completed. Upon receipt of payment, the permit will be issued.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (Garages/Sheds)
BUILDING AND ZONING REQUIREMENTS
(REVISED 4/21/16)
NOTE: No building permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one (1)
detached accessory building on a single parcel in addition to one (1) private garage
(attached or detached), except by conditional use permit.
PERMIT SUBMITAL CHECKLIST:
Signed completed Zoning Permit application for structures equal to or less than 200 square
feet, along with a Certificate of Survey with shed drawn in its location to scale.
Signed completed Building Permit application for structures greater than 200 square feet,
with the following documents:
2 Copies of a Certificate of Survey, drawn to scale indicating the lot dimensions, the
location and ground coverage area of existing structure(s), and the location and area of the
proposed structure. Indicate the setbacks from property lines and other buildings on lot. A
Certificate of Survey for the property may be on file at City Hall.
2 Copies of plans showing proposed designs and materials. Plans shall be drawn to scale
and shall include the following information:
1. A floor plan indicating the following:
Proposed garage/shed size.
Size of headers over openings.
Size and spacing of roof rafters/trusses.
2. A cross section view indicating the following:
Depth of concrete slab and perimeter bearing if applicable.
Size and spacing of skids and floor joists. (when building a wood floor)
Location and type of anchor used to anchor building to ground. (when building a
wood floor with no foundation)
Pitch of roof.
Size, grade and spacing of roof rafters/trusses.
Type(s) of sheathing and siding material.
Ceiling height.
3. Elevations indicating the following:
Height of structure from established grade.
Type of roof covering materials.
Type of exterior sheathing, bracing and wall covering.
Attached are examples of drawings which are intended as a GUIDE ONLY!!
GENERAL BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS:
Garage floor surfaces may be concrete, asphalt, sand, gravel, crushed rock, or natural earth.
Special design consideration required for garage walls which do not have a concrete slab to
resist the lateral pressure of backfill on the base of the wall. Sheds intended for storage of
yard equipment, and not automobiles or other vehicles, may have floors built with treated
lumber. 1000 square feet maximum for slab on grade construction.
All Automatic Garage Door Opening Systems must comply with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes 325F.82, and 325F.83
325F.83, Subd. 3: All automatic garage door opening systems must include an attached
edge sensor, safety beam, or similar device that when activated causes a closing door to
open and prevents an open door from closing. This device is to be designed and built so
that a failure of the device prevents the door from closing.
The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported directly on the ground shall be not
less than inches.
All stumps, roots and black dirt shall be removed from the soil to a depth of twelve (12)
inches below the surface of the ground.
Walls shall be anchored to the slab with minimum ½ inch diameter anchor bolts or foundation
anchor straps spaced a maximum of 6 feet on center around the perimeter of slab. There shall
be a minimum of 2 bolts per section of wall plate with one bolt located not more than 12
inches or less than 7 bolt diameters from each end of the plate section.
Sheds built on treated skids and wood floors shall be anchored to the ground at the corners by
means of screw anchors or other anchor device to prevent overturning in high winds.
Foundation plates or sills resting on concrete slabs supported directly on grade shall be treated
wood. Wood supported on concrete within 8 inches of exposed ground shall also be treated.
Wood siding, sheathing, and wall framing on the exterior of a building having a clearance of
less than 6 inches from the ground shall be treated.
Caulk and flash all exterior openings.
Roof framing for detached garages must be designed for minimum 35 pounds per square foot
snow load. Manufactured trusses shall not be altered and truss specs shall be on site for
framing inspection.
Engineered design required on pole barn structures to show compliance with code required
structural stability to wind and snow loads.
GENERAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS:
Required Paved Driveway:
Detached structures having an exterior opening of 8 feet or greater shall have a paved
driveway to existing driveway meeting the requirements of Zoning Ordinance section 11-19-
7. I.
Height:
The height of an accessory building shall be measured from the mean ground level to the
mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof, to the uppermost point of other roof
types. Except as expressly permitted by conditional use permit, accessory buildings shall
comply with the following height limitations:
Zoning
District
Maximum
Height
Zoning
District
Maximum
Height
Zoning
District
Maximum
Height
A-P
20 Feet
RS-3
15 Feet
RST-2
15 Feet
RA
20 Feet
RS-4
15 Feet
RM-1
15 Feet
RS-1
20 Feet
RS-CBD
15 Feet
RH-1
15 Feet
RS-2
15 Feet
RST-1
15 Feet
Setbacks and Encroachment:
For corner lots within the RS-3, RS-4, and RS-CBD districts, private garages (attached or
detached) that are oriented so that vehicle access is directly straight in off of a public street
adjacent to the side lot line shall be set back not less than 25 feet from the side lot line
abutting the public right of way.
All detached accessory buildings equal to or less than 200 square feet shall be set back at
least 6 feet from any other building or structure on the same lot, and shall not be located
within a required buffer yard or drainage and/or utility easement.
Min 10 feet
Sample Survey
Such structures may encroach into the required side or rear yard setbacks when located
in the rear yard of a lot, except in the case of a side yard of a corner lot abutting a public
street. When encroachment into required side or rear yard setbacks is allowed, such
detached accessory buildings shall be set back at least 5 feet from all adjoining lots.
All detached accessory buildings in excess of 200 square feet shall be set back at least 10
feet from any other building or structure on the same lot, and shall not be located within a
required buffer yard or drainage and/or utility easement.
Such structures may encroach into the required side or rear yard setbacks when located
in the rear yard of a lot, except in the case of a side yard of a corner lot abutting a public
street. When encroachment into required side or rear yard setbacks is allowed, such
detached accessory buildings shall be set back at least 10 feet from all adjoining lots.
In the RS-CBD District, detached accessory buildings shall be set back at least 5 feet from
side lot lines.
Area Limitations: Except for agricultural buildings on farms or as expressly permitted by
conditional use permit, the combination of accessory buildings and garages shall not exceed
either of the following area limitations per unit or the total gross floor area of the principal
structure, whichever is least:
Zoning
District
Use
Max % of min. lot area
occupied by accessory structure
Max floor area per
accessory structure
A-P
All Uses
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
RA
Single
Family
2% 8,712
RS-1
Single
Family
10% 2,000
RS-2
Single
Family
10% 1,500
RS-3
Single
Family
10%
1,100 (interior lot)
1,250 (corner lot)
RS-4
Single
Family
10%
1,100 (interior lot)
1,250 (corner lot)
RS-
CBD
Single
Family
10%
840 (interior lot)
1,008 (corner lot)
RST-1
Single
Family
10% 1,500
Two
Family
10% 750
RST-2
Single
Family
10%
1,100 (interior lot)
1,250 (corner lot)
Detached
Townhouse
10% 750
Two
Family
10% 750
RM-1
Single
Family
10%
1,100 (interior lot)
1,250 (corner lot)
RM-1
Two
Family
10% 750
Townhouse
10%
750
RH-1
Single
Family
10%
1,100 (interior lot)
1,250 (corner lot)
Two
Family
10% 750
Townhouse
10%
750
For lots in the RA, RS-1, RS-2, and RS-3 districts one acre or larger with Single-family
homes that have an above grade finished floor area of more than 2,000 square feet are
permitted a garage attached to the principal building not exceeding a maximum area of
1,250 square feet and an additional detached accessory structure of no more than 200
square feet.
Exterior Building Material: The same or similar quality and scale exterior building
materials shall be used in the accessory buildings as in the principal building. All accessory
buildings shall also be compatible with the principal building on the lot. "Compatible" means
that the exterior appearance of the accessory building is not at variance with the principal
building from an aesthetic and architectural standpoint as to cause; a difference to a degree to
cause incongruity or a nuisance. (Ord. 762, sec. 7, 4-5-2004)
NOTE: For specific code and zoning requirements, please contact the Building Inspection
Department at 952-985-4440.
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS:
Slab: After forms and reinforcing are in place, but prior to pouring concrete.
Electrical Rough-In: Splices completed, minimum 6 inches of conductor, not energized.
Framing: After all framing and wiring are complete, roof covering installed but prior to
application of the siding.
Electrical Final: When wiring is complete and all fixtures installed.
Final: When the structure has been completed and final electrical approved.
GENERAL NOTES:
The stamped, city approved plan and survey shall be kept on the job site and readily available
until the final inspection has been made.
The Inspection Record Card shall be placed on an exterior wall of the Accessory Building
and shall remain posted until the final inspection has been made. Cards should be protected
from the weather.
Call 952-985-4440 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. to schedule for an inspection. Provide
at least 24-hour advance notice and provide permit number at time of scheduling.
Prior to digging, call Gopher Services at 651-454-0002 to verify utility locations. Forty-eight
hour notice is required, excluding weekends and holidays.
?
?
Garage Door Header Size?
Engineered roof trusses
or
rafter size & spacing
Opening Size?
12
?
Sheathing type and size
Engineered truss or
Rafter size and spacing
Stud size and spacing
Wall sheathing type and size
12 inches minimum below
undisturbed soil
12”
Min
3,500 pound concrete
3 ½ inches minimum
(5-7% air-entrained)
½ inch anchor bolts spaced per
code with 7 inch embedment
Treated sill plate
2016 City of Lakeville
Zoning Permit Application
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
20195 HOLYOKE AVENUE
LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55044
(952) 985-4420
Date: ___________________________________________________
Zoning Permit Fee: $30.00
Job Site Address: ________________________________________________________________________________
Property Owner: _____________________________________________Phone: _____________________________
Property Owner Email____________________________________________________________________________
Street Address: _______________________________________________City: _______________Zip: ___________
Contractor: _________________________________________________Phone: _____________________________
Contractor Email________________________________________________________________________________
Street Address: ______________________________________________
_City: _______________Zip: ___________
PLEASE COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTION(S)
Fences: Materials: Wood Type: Privacy Setbacks: Front _______ Height:_______
Chain-link Pool Enclosure Side _______
Plastic Kennel Side _______
Iron Decorative Rear _______
Other______________ Other ______________
Accessory Buildings: Size: Length _______ Construction Type: Wood Setbacks: Side _______
(200 square feet or less) Width _______ Aluminum Side _______
Height _______ Other ______________ Rear _______
Do you have an existing detached accessory building on your property? No______ Yes______
Above-ground Pools: Size: Dimensions _______ Enclosure: Deck / gated entrance Setbacks
: Side______
(less than 5000 gallons) Depth _______ Fence (around pool) Side______
Wall Height _______ Fence (around ladder) Rear______
Gated Ladder
Do you have an existing fence? No______ Yes______ If yes, what type? ________________________________
Applicant must submit an approved survey of the property that indicates the location and setbacks of the fence,
accessory building or swimming pool.
I HEREBY APPLY FOR A ZONING PERMIT AND I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE INFORMATION ABOVE IS COMPLETE AND
ACCURATE; THAT THE WORK WILL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ORDINANCES AND CODES OF THE CITY; THAT I
UNDERSTAND WORK IS NOT TO START WITHOUT AN APPROVED ZONING PERMIT; AND THAT THE WORK WILL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN.
Please allow at least 3 business days for processing
Applicant’s Signature: _______________________________________Date: ______________________________
July 2016
City of Lakeville Zoning Permit Application Page 2
THIS PAGE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY
Job Site Address: _____________________________________
Permit Type:
Zoning ZN
Permit Sub-Type:
Fences (93) _________
Accessory Buildings, 200 S.F. or less (71) _________
Above-ground Pool, less than 5000 gal (91) _________
Work Type:
New (81) _________
Replace (85) _________
Alter / Remodel (86) _________
Move (87) _________
_____________ _________
Required Inspections:
Footing / Site (61) _________
Final (65) _________
Zoning District: _________
Administrative Permit required: __________
Permit Fee:
Permit Fee: _________
Other Fees: _________
Total: _________
Approved By: ___________________________________________Date: ____________________
Zoning Administrator
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
PROPERTY ADDRESS__________________________________________________________ DATE OF APPLICATION__________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PROPERTY OWNER (Name) (Address) (Phone)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CONTRACTOR (Name) (Address) (Phone)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CONTACT PERSON (Name) (Phone) State License #
(Applicant must complete and attach a subcontractor list)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ARCHITECT (Name) (Address) (Phone)
Property
Type:
Commercial
Residential
Description
of Work:
New Construction
Alterations
Porch
Addition
Deck
Kitchen
Roofing*
Siding*
Window(s)*
Door(s)
Garage
Swimming Pool
Bathroom
Basement
Misc.___________________________________________________________
ACKNOWLEDMENT AND SIGNATURE
The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of including the City of Mendota Heights to take the action herein
requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Mendota Heights, the
State of Minnesota, and Rulings of the Building department.
1. All contractors and subcontractors shall be licensed in accordance with City and State requirements.
2. This permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of the City Building and Zoning Codes.
3. This permit does not authorize construction of sewage treatment systems, plumbing, HVAC or electrical work.
________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT SIGNATURE BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL
City Office Use Only:
Date Permit Issued:
Permit Number:
Effective 2-1-15
City office Use Only:
Permit Fee
$
Plan Review Fee
$
State Surcharge
$
SAC
$
WAC
$
Penalty Fee
$
Other
$
Total Fee
$
*Roofing
Commercial
1% of value minimum $100.00
maximum $1,000.00
*Roofing/and or Siding
Residential
1% of value /$100.00 minimum
*Windows
Residential
1% of value /$75.00 minimum
Permit Valuation $__________________
APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT
Office Use Only:
Application Date:________Zoning District:________Permit #:_________Permit Fee:_________
Property Address:______________________________________________________________
Applicant Name:________________________________Phone:_________________________
Applicant E-Mail Address:________________________________________________________
Applicant Mailing Address:_______________________________________________________
Contractor Name:_______________________________Phone:_________________________
Contractor Mailing Address:______________________________________________________
Property Owner Name:___________________________Phone:_________________________
Property Owner Mailing Address:__________________________________________________
Fence Area (SQ. FT.):_________Fence Height (FT.):_________Material:__________________
Property Line Setbacks (FT.):_________Front Yard_________Rear Yard__________Side Yard
Please provide a sketch and/or picture of the proposed fence’s location and materials.
The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City
of Mendota Heights to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that work
herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Mendota Heights, the
State of Minnesota, and rulings of the Building Department.
Applicant Signature Staff Approval Date
Fence Permit Application (modified 3/31/2015) Page 1 of 2
FIGURE 1D-6: RESIDENTIAL FENCE REQUIREMENTS
Fence Permit Application (modified 3/31/2015) Page 2 of 2
Updated 11/13/2015
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145
th
Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Phone (651)322-2024
Fax (651)423-5203
Permit Application
Building
Plumbing
Heating
Sewer
Private septic
Site Address:
Legal Description: Lot Block Subdivision
or PID #
Owner Information
Name
Address:
City/State: Zip:
Phone:
Email:
Contractor Information
Name
Address:
City/State: Zip:
Email:
State License No.
Contact: Phone: Fax:
Description of Work:
(If this is a deck permit application please complete deck supplement and attach to this application.)
Valuation (including labor): $
New single family homes:
Has this model been permitted before? No Yes If yes, master plan number/name
The undersigned acknowledges that he/she has read this application and the above information is correct and accurate.
Applicant also understands by signing this application that he/she could be held responsible as representative of this
project for any violation of compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances of the City of Rosemount.
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent Date
NOTICE: This is an application only. Permit will be issued after City approval and payment of fees.
****************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ******************************
Engineering Approval Date
Type of Construction
Planning Approval Date
Occupancy Classification
Fire Marshal Approval Date
Special Conditions
Building Approval Date
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145
th
Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
651-423-4411
651-423-4424 (FAX)
Rental License Application
Rental Premises Address:
Name of Complex, (if any) ____________
Owner Name:
Address:
City/State: Zip:
Phone:
E-mail:
Check one of the following that applies:
New Rental License Renewal Rental License
Properties within the City of Rosemount:
Agent/Caretaker:
Address:
City/State: Zip:
Phone:
E-mail:
Type of rental dwelling unit:
Single-Family Duplex Townhome
Multi-Family Structure (Apartments/Condos)
# of buildings: # of rental dwelling units:
Properties outside of the City of Rosemount:
List the business names and property addresses for rental properties operated by the applicant in other
Minnesota municipalities.
Address: City:
The undersigned hereby applies for a rental dwelling license as required by Title 9-8-4 of the City Code of the City of Rosemount;
acknowledges that the provisions of Title 9 Chapter 8 of the City Code have been reviewed; and attests that the subject premises will be
operated and maintained according to the requirements contained therein, subject to applicable sanctions and penalties. The undersigned
further agrees that the subject premises may be inspected by the housing official as provided in Title 9-8-8 of the City Code. The
applicant further certifies that all statements and facts in this application are true and authorizes the City of Rosemount to investigate
any or all statements or facts contained herein acknowledging that the misrepresentation or the omission of facts called for will be just
cause for the suspension or revocation of the license.
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent Date
Make sure to enclose the application fee when mailing this applicationcall 651 322 2024 if you need fee information.
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145
th
Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Small Accessory
Building
200 square feet or
less
Small Accessory Buildings are defined as Buildings 200 Square Feet in Floor Area or Smaller
In the City of Rosemount, in all agricultural and residential zoning districts small accessory buildings
200 square feet in size or smaller do not require a building permit. There are however regulations
for small accessory buildings which you must be aware of and incorporate into your design and
construction.
Although a permit may not be required, the following conditions apply to small accessory buildings:
1. They may not be placed closer than 30 feet to a street side or front yard property line.
2. They may not be placed closer than 10 feet to any side property line or 5 feet to any rear
property lines in most zoning districts. Setbacks are subject to zoning requirements. Please
verify with the Planning Department.
3. The structures must be placed so as not to obstruct or change direction of storm water run-
off from your property or your neighbors
4. In no case shall the structure be placed in easements. (When/if you place any structure on a
legal easement you will be responsible for moving the structure. Keep this in mind when placing
your accessory building.)
5. The accessory building must be 3 feet away from a house minimum.
6. Exterior treatments (siding and roofing) should be carefully considered. There are no
specific treatment requirements for accessory buildings under 120 square feet, but it should
complement the buildings in the neighborhood. For accessory buildings over 120 square feet the
building must comply with ordinance 11-5-2A.6. The ordinance requires the exterior have 3 to
12 roof pitch, asphalt shingles and siding must be identical or nearly matching the principal
structure.
7. The maximum height of the building is 18 feet.
Updated May 23, 2016
Updated May 10, 2016
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145
th
Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Fence Information
Permits Permits are required for all fences installed in Rosemount. Fence permit fees are
$75.00
Plan Submittals Include permit application and a drawing of your property indicating
where your fence is to be placed.
Maximum Height The maximum height of any fence installed within the City of
Rosemount is 6 feet. Fences installed around swimming pools from
ground up must be a minimum of 4 feet high and non-climbable with a
self-closing/self latching gate.
Setbacks All fences may be installed up to but not on the property line. For
setback information on properties that have wetlands or ponding areas
call Engineering at 651-322-2055.
Establish property lines The City of Rosemount does not provide surveying services. It is up to
the homeowner to establish the location of the lines and make these
available upon request of the inspector.
Special consideration Fences that extend into front yards of corner lots MUST NOT impair
traffic visibility. See figure #1. Fences that extend into rear yards must
consider abutting properties. If your rear yard abuts adjacent properties
front yard then the fence in the front yard setback area must not exceed
42 inches.
Covenants The City of Rosemount does not enforce the private covenants of
subdivisions. Homeowners should always check the covenants in their
areas for additional fence requirements.
Inspections A final inspection is required upon completion for all fences. The city
reviewed plans must be onsite during the final inspection.
Page 1
Use BLUE or BLACK Ink
City of South St. Paul
125 3
rd
Avenue North
South St. Paul, MN 55075
Phone: (651) 554-3220
Fax: (651) 554-3211
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Date: ___________ Site Address: ______________________________ Unit #: _______ PID # _____________________________
PROPERTY
OWNER
Name: ___________________________________ Address: __________________________________
City: ______________________State: _____ Zip: _________ Phone: ______________________
E-mail: _______________________________________ Rental Property? _____ Yes _____ No
TENANT/LEASE
HOLDER
Name: _____________________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Address / City / Zip: ________________________________________________________________________
TYPE OF WORK
Description of work: __________________________________________________________________
Construction Cost/Value: ____________________ Multi-Family Building: (Yes ____ / No ____)
CONTRACTOR
Company: __________________________________________ Contact: _____________________________
Address: ____________________________________________ City: _______________________________
State: _____ Zip: _________ Phone: ________________ Cell: ___________________
License #: _____________________ Lead Certificate: _____________ E-mail: ________________________
ARCHITECT/
ENGINEER
Name: ___________________________________________ Registration #: ______________________
Address: ________________________________________ City: _______________________________
State: _________ Zip: _________________ Phone: __________________________
Contact Person: __________________________ Email: _______________________________________
If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 2 for additional information)
Comments: ____________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
This permit expires if work does not commence within 180 days of issuance or if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days.
All exterior work covered by this permit must be completed within 180 days of issuance. The Building Official may grant a one-time extension
of up to 180 days upon written request with justifiable cause demonstrated. All work - any work that wishes to be recommenced on an
expired permit requires a renewal permit. The fee will be half the cost of the original permit.
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work specified herein, agreeing to do all the work in strict accordance with South St. Paul
City Ordinances, applicable codes, and rulings of the Building Official; and, hereby declares that this application has been reviewed and all facts are true
and correct.
x_________________________________________
Applicant’s Signature
For Office Use
Permit #: __________________
Permit Fee: ___________________
Date Received: ________________
Date Issued: __________________
Page 2
BUILDING PERMIT TYPES
Accessory Building
Drywall/Sheetrock
Other
Stairway
Alteration/Remodel
Doors/Windows (2 or more)
Porch (3 Season)
Storm Damage
Basement Finish
Egress Window
Porch (4 Season)
Stucco
Chimney Repair
Fire Repair
Porch (Gazebo/Pergola)
Swimming Pool
Commercial/Industrial
Foundation
Public Facility
Townhome
Communication Tower
Garage
Retaining Wall
Two-Family Residential
Deck
Garage Door (overhead)
Roof
Water Damage
Demolition
Handicap Accessibility
Siding/Soffit/Fascia
Door/Window (1 opening)
Insulation
Single Family Residential
Drain Tile
Multi-Family
Solar Energy
WORK TYPES
Addition
Land Disturbing
Other
Replace
Foundation/Grading
Move Building
Permit Renewal
Tenant Finish
Interior Demo Only
New
Repair
DESCRIPTION
# of Units
Stories
Set Back - Front
# of Buildings
Square Feet
Set Back - Rear
Type of Construction
Length
Set Back - Side
Occupancy
Width
Set Back - Side
Code Edition
Fire Sprinklers
Zoning
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Address Numbers
Plumbing: ___ Rough In ___ Final
Combustion Air
Poured Wall
Drain Tile: ___ Rough In ___ Final
Radon Control
Drywall/Sheetrock
Retaining Wall: ___ Footings ___ Backfill ___ Final
Footings
Roof: ___ I/W (pics ok) ___ Decking ___Insulation
Forms/Slab
Siding: ___ Wrap (pics ok) ___ Lath ___ Brick
Foundation/Waterproofing
Smoke/CO Detectors
Framing
Wallboard/Sheathing
Insulation
Window(s)/Door(s)
Lath/Paper/Stucco
Final / No Certificate of Occupancy
Mechanical: ___Rough In ___Air Test ___Final
Final / Certificate of Occupancy
Other
Final/ Certificate of Occupancy w/Fire Marshal
Reviewed By: Building Official/Date Planning/Zoning/Date
LEAD CERTIFICATION EXEMPTION
Check
Appropriate Box
The applicant is not a Minnesota licensed residential
contractor, residential remodeler or roofer.
The building was constructed after 1978.
The structure is not residential housing or a child occupied
facility.
The renovation will not disrupt 6 square feet or more of
painted surface per room for interior activities, or 20 square
feet or more of painted surface for exterior activities, and
does not involve windows.
FEE CALCULATIONS
Base Fee (Permit)
Plan Review (25% to 100%)
Surcharge (State)
MCES SAC Units ______
Escrow
Park Dedication Fee
Occupancy Permit
TOTAL
Page 3
NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
Site Address:
Applicant:
Phone Number:
Check
Appropriate Box
One (1) signed and completed building permit application including a current contractor license number.
Two (2) copies of detailed plans, drawn to scale including but not limited to; foundation plan and wall design
including foundation wall insulation, radon control system, floor plan(s), cross section(s), elevation plan(s), beam
size(s), joist size(s) and spacing, label window and door openings with the manufacturing U-value, and label all
exterior wall and ceilings with the R-value
Three (3) copies of a scaled Certificate of Survey prepared by a Minnesota registered land surveyor complying
with City approved Survey requirements (maximum size 11 x 17).
One (1) copy of energy code design criteria labeled on the plan, verifying that the building envelope meets the
provisions of Table N1102.1 and/or Table N1102.1.2.
Exceptions would include one of the following calculations that must be submitted for approval:
o R-value computation method per N1102.1.1.
o Total UA alternative per N1102.1.3.
o Engineered systems alternative per N1102.1.5.
One (1) copy of calculated heat loss / gain and calculated cooling load verifying HVAC sizing in compliance with
the Minnesota Energy Code.
One (1) copy of IFGC Appendix E, Worksheet E-1 calculating combustion air size, AND
One (1) copy of IMC Table 501.4.1 calculating makeup air quantity.
OR
One (1) Centerpoint Energy Form completed by a HVAC contractor, including size of mechanical room.*
One (1) copy of New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate (N1101.8).
Two (2) copies of the individual lot tree preservation plan, if required by the development contract, shall be in
accordance with the South St. Paul City Code.
* Please contact (651) 675-5675 if you are experiencing problems with the Centerpoint Energy software.
REMODEL / REPAIR REQUIREMENTS
Check
Appropriate Box
Two (2) copies of plan showing footings, beams and joists, label window and door openings with the
manufacturing U-value, and label all exterior wall and ceilings with the R-values
One (1) copy of energy code design criteria labeled on the plan verifying that the building envelope meets the
provisions of Table N1102.1 and/or Table N1102.1.2.
Exceptions would include one of the following calculations that must be submitted for approval:
o R-value computation method per N1102.1.1.
o Total UA alternative per N1102.1.3.
o Engineered systems alternative per N1102.1.5.
One (1) site survey for additions and decks
Addition indicate if on-site septic system
LEAD CERTIFICATION EXEMPTION
Check
Appropriate Box
The applicant is not a Minnesota licensed residential contractor, residential remodeler or roofer.
The building was constructed after 1978.
The structure is not residential housing or a child occupied facility.
The renovation will not disrupt 6 square feet or more of painted surface per room for interior activities, or 20 square
feet or more of painted surface for exterior activities, and does not involve windows.
Page 1 of 4
For Office Use Only
125 Third Avenue North
South St. Paul, MN 55075
Telephone: (651) 554-3270
Fax: (651) 554-3271
www.southstpaul.org
Submittal Date:
Application Received By:
Receipt Number:
PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION
Property Information
Applicant Information (name and address used in public notices)
Applicant (company name or individual):
Contact person:
Title:
Street Address:
City/State/ Zip Code:
Telephone No.:
( )
Fax No.:
( )
Email Address:
Owner Information
Property Owner
Owner’s Street Address:
City/State/Zip Code:
Telephone No.:
( )
Fax No.:
( )
Email Address:
Planning and Zoning Application Filing Requirements:
Minimum Requirements All applications. All Planning and Zoning Applications MUST be
accompanied by the following:
A completed Planning and Zoning Application form (including owner’s signature or letter of consent).
Required application and escrow fees (listed on the first page of this form).
A scaled site plan (for all development projects) showing the lot size and location, and adjacent streets.
Dimensions and location of existing and proposed buildings and/or additions.
Location of all buildings on adjacent properties.
Existing and/or proposed parking areas and access drives, type of surfacing, curbing, and
drainage.
A narrative from the petitioner explaining their request. The narrative should include any and all
pertinent information the City Staff, Planning Commission, and City Council may need in assisting their
consideration of the request. Requests that involve a commercial or industrial operation should include
the following in the narrative:
Type of business/activity.
Expected activities on the site.
Number of employees.
Number of anticipated customers at any one time.
Hours of operation.
Address of Subject Property:
Page 2 of 4
Additional Requirements for Variances. All Variance applications MUST also include the following:
A narrative clearly indicating how the proposed variance is consistent with the standards for granting a
variance (see the criteria from City Code section 118-39 listed below) to warrant variance approval.
The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance; and,
The terms of the variance are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and
The applicant for the variances establishes that there are practical difficulties in
complying with the ordinance
o (Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties)
o The property owner proposes to utilize the property in a reasonable manner.
o The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property that
were not created by the property owner; and
o The variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.
Additional Requirements New Construction/Subdivision. Applications for a new business, new
residential dwelling or any other application that requires new construction or subdivision of land
(example applications include Variances, PUDs, CUPs, and Plats) shall include the following:
A certified land survey.
Architectural elevations and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings from the front, side, and
rear property lines.
Scaled Plan Sets - Three (3) large scale copies, folded in sets no larger than 8 ½” x 14” with the print
side facing out.** Scaled plan sets shall include:
Signage plans (including size, location, and color).
Landscaping plans (including location, size, and species).
Lighting plans
Fencing plan (including height, location, and type of fencing).
Screening plan (for any outside storage).
Drainage and Utility Plans
Present lot elevation and proposed finished grades
Plat drawings showing existing and proposed lots, blocks, right of way, and easements.
Plan Reductions -One (1) copy of 11” x 17” reductions for plans listed above**
PDF or JPEG copies of the plans, plats, elevations, or renderings are requested if they are available.
As-builts of water and sewers in CAD format are requested if they are available.
**City staff reserves the right to require additional copies as needed.
True and accurate representation of the requirements outlined for the specified type of request is
the responsibility of the applicant.
Complete/Incomplete Applications
An incomplete application will delay the processing of planning and zoning requests. The application
approval time commences and an application is considered officially filed when the City Planner has
received and examined the application and determined that the application is complete. A decision on
whether the application is complete or incomplete shall be made within fifteen (15) days following the
submittal of the application and the applicant will be notified in writing of the decision. When the application
is deemed to be “complete” it shall be placed on the agenda of the first possible Planning Commission
meeting.
The City recommends that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner (651-554-3217) to
discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines.
Notice of Meeting Attendance
In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a
designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until
the next available agenda.
Page 3 of 4
Filing Requirements and Payment of Fees and Escrows
The undersigned acknowledges that she/he understands that before this request can be considered, all
required information and fees and escrows must be paid to the City in advance. If additional fees or escrows
are required to cover costs incurred by the City, the City has the right to require additional payment from
one or more of the undersigned, who shall be jointly and severally liable for such fees or escrows. Such
expenses may include (but are not limited to) fees paid to consultants, engineers, planners, attorneys and
other professionals. The City may withhold final action on a Planning and Zoning Application and/or rescind
prior action until all additional fees or escrows have been paid.
Type of Request
*Application Fee:
*Escrow Deposit:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Minor
Major
($ 200.00)
($ 500.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 1,000.00)
Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
Residential
Commercial / Industrial
Amendment
($ 250.00)
($ 300.00)
($ 150.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 750.00)
($ 500.00)
Final Plat
2 or fewer lots
3 or more lots
($ 0.00)
($ 150.00)
($ 0.00)
($ 250.00)
Interim Use Permit (IUP)
Residential
Commercial / Industrial
($ 150.00)
($ 200.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 500.00)
Tax Parcel Split / Combination
($ 100.00)
($ 100.00)
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Amendment to PUD
($ 350.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 1,000.00)
($ 500.00)
Preliminary Plat
2 or fewer lots
3 or more lots
($ 250.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 1,000.00)
Rezoning
Residential
Commercial / Industrial
($ 350.00)
($ 350.00)
($ 500.00)
($ 500.00)
Site Plan Review
($ 100.00)
($ 100.00)
Variance
Residential
Commercial / Industrial
($ 150.00)
($ 200.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 500.00)
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Minor
Major
($ 100.00)
($ 500.00)
($ 250.00)
($ 500.00)
Acknowledgement and Signature
I acknowledge that I have read all of the information listed in the City of South St. Paul Planning and Zoning
Application and fully understand that I am responsible for costs, as outlined in this application, incurred by
the City related to the processing of this application. I hereby certify that all fees, charges, utility bills, taxes
and special assessments for the property have been paid.
_________________________________________________ ________________
Applicant Signature Date
_________________________________________________ ________________
Property Owner Signature Date
Page 4 of 4
Agenda Deadline and Meeting Schedule
The deadline for submittal of Planning and Zoning Applications is noon of the day specified as according
to the schedule outlined below. There are no exceptions. All Planning Commission and City Council
meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the South St. Paul City Hall, 125 Third Avenue North, South
St. Paul, Minnesota 55075, unless otherwise stated. Applicants are advised that additional meetings and/or
workshops may be scheduled when necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission or City Council.
2017 SCHEDULE (*subject to change)
** Meeting dates are tentative (If there are no applications to be reviewed the meetings may be cancelled) so please consult
the City Planner to verify meeting dates.
All meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the South St. Paul City Hall (125 3
rd
Avenue North, South St. Paul) unless
specifically stated otherwise.
PC Meeting
Council Meeting
APPLICATION
DEADLINE
(Due at Noon)
**TENTATIVE
PLANNING
COMMISSION
MEETING
(Generally held on Wednesday at 7:00 p.m.)
TENTATIVE
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
DATE
(Generally held on Monday at 7:15 p.m.)
November 28, 2016
January 4, 2017
January 17, 2017
(Tuesday)
January 3, 2017
February 1, 2017
February 6, 2017
February 6, 2017
March 1, 2017
March 6, 2017
March 6, 2017
April 5, 2017
April 17, 2017
April 3, 2017
May 3, 2017
May 15, 2017
May 8, 2017
June 7, 2017
June 19, 2017
June 5, 2017
July 12, 2017
July 17, 2017
July 3, 2017
August 2, 2017
August 21, 2017
August 7, 2017
September 6, 2017
September 18, 2017
September 5, 2017
October 4, 2017
October 16, 2017
October 2, 2017
November 1, 2017
November 20, 2017
November 6, 2017
December 6, 2017
December 18, 2017
December 4, 2017
January 3, 2018
January 16, 2018
O New O Alteration O Roof/Siding
O Addition O Deck O Window
Project Valuation:
Project Address:
O Contractor Information Verified with MN DOLI
Signature: _____________________________________________
Date: _________________
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
State License #:
Contact Name:
OFFICE USE ONLY
O Homeowner Affidavit Received
WORK PROPOSED:
O Demolition
O Garage
O Single Family Residential
O Multi-Family Residential (2-4 units)
$
PROJECT INFORMATION
SAC Fee
Permit Fee*
Plan Review
State Surcharge**
$
$
Project Description:
FEES
*Permit Fee is based valuation as per the 1997 UBC
Permit Fee Schedule
$
O Other _______________________________________
PROPERTY TYPE:
O Apartment Complex
O Commercial
SITE/OWNER
Company Name:
Address:
Name:
Phone:
E-Mail:
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
Company Name:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
City of West St. Paul
Community Development Department - Phone: 651-552-4116 - FAX: 651-552-4190
1616 Humboldt Ave - West St Paul MN 551118
Building Permit Application
**State Surcharge is .0005 x project value with no
minimum. Consult fee schedule to calculate
surcharge for projects valueing over $1,000,000.00
$
$
License Verification Fee
Investigation Fee
TOTAL
$
Other
$
Permit Number: BLDG2017-_______
Application Date: _______________
CONTRACTOR
PROMOTING AND PRESERVING A COMMUNITY OF EXCELLENCE BY THE
ETHICAL, RESPONSIVE, EFFICIENT AND INNOVATIVE PROVISION OF SERVICES
C i t y H a l l
1 6 1 6 H u m b o l d t A v e n u e
We s t S t . P a u l , M N
55118- 3972
651- 552- 4 1 0 0
F A X 6 5 1 - 5 5 2 - 4 1 9 0
T D D 6 5 1 - 3 2 2 - 2 3 2 3
www.ws p m n . g o v
Commercial Building Permit Submittal Requirements
(Depending on the scope of projects, some items may not apply)
1. A completed building permit application.
2. Letter from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services assigning the number of
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) units to the building. Contact the Met Council at (651)
602-1378 or see their website. http://www.metrocouncil.org/Wastewater-Water/Funding-
Finance/Rates-Charges/Sewer-Availability-Charge.aspx
3. Plan review letter from Minnesota Department of Health (651)201-4500. Projects such as
commercial kitchens, salad bars, condiment counters, hoods and ventilation, bars, buffets,
plumbing fixtures, beverage dispensing, outdoor bars and beverage services.
http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/food/license/planreview.html
4. Plan review letter from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Projects such as
commercial bakery, convenience store, grocery store, mobile unit, prepackaged foods.
Contact the Minnesota Department of Agriculture at (651) 201-6027 or see their website.
http://www.mda.state.mn.us/food/business/plan-review.aspx
5. Planning Department approval.
6. Engineering Department approval.
7. Four complete sets of plans for review and approval. Plans must contain the following:
a) Architectural with complete code analysis life safety egress plan and signed
stamped structural engineering including snow load calculations
b) Mechanical and electrical
c) Erosion control, site utilities, grading, landscape, lighting plan
d) Life safety and egress
e) Site line drawings for roof top unit screening approval
8. Signed plumbing plans must be submitted with permit application. State approved review
letter and approved plumbing plans, if applicable. Contact the Minnesota Department of
Labor & Industry at (651)284-5067 or see their website.
http://www.doli.state.mn.us/CCLD/Plumbing.asp
9. Two complete sets of job specifications (spec books).
10. Documentation for all fire-rated assemblies and fire stopping materials.
11. Separate permits are required for fire suppression and alarm systems submit them to the
South Metro Fire Marshal at 651-552-4172. Plans must be signed by a registered MN
Fire Protection Engineer or a NICET level 3 or 4 designer. Contact
lmcmillan@southmetrofire.com
12. Soil test report. Soils report must include recommended heated and non-heated footing
depths .
13. Energy calculations for heat loss/heat gain. Minnesota Energy Code Analysis as outlined
in Minnesota State Building Code Ch. 1323.
14. Special inspection testing schedule along with list of the qualifications of individuals
performing special inspections.
15. Grading Permit may be obtained from the Building Department prior to building permit
issuance. Footing foundation permits also available prior to main building permit.
16. Landscape/Erosion Control Escrow or letter of credit must be submitted to the Building
Department prior to building permit issuance in the amount of $3000 per acre or $1000
for a residential lot.
Building Codes currently in effect as of January 24,2015
MN Rule 1300 2015 Minnesota State Building Code (SBC)
MN Rule 1305 2012 International Building Code (IBC)
MN Rule 1307 2007 Minnesota Elevator Code (Elevator Code)
MN Rule 1315 2008 National Electrical Code (NEC)
MN Rule 1323 2015 Commercial Energy Code (Energy Code)
MN Rule 1341 2015 Minnesota Accessibility Code
MN Rule 1346 2015 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2006 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
MN Rule 4715 2009 Minnesota Plumbing Code (SPC)
MN Rule 7511 2007 Minnesota Fire Code (replaces Chapter 7510)
2007 International Fire Code (IFC)
Please submit all documents to the Building Official in the Building Inspection Department.
Documents will be distributed to the appropriate department for review (Planning, Engineering
and Building). Permit turn-around times vary due to the complexities of the plans and the
completeness of the plans submitted. If you have questions, please contact the Building
Inspection Department at 651-552-4116.
PROMOTING AND PRESERVING A COMMUNITY OF EXCELLENCE BY THE
ETHICAL, RESPONSIVE, EFFICIENT AND INNOVATIVE PROVISION OF SERVICES
C i t y H a l l
1 6 1 6 H u m b o l d t A v e n u e
We s t S t . P a u l , M N
55118- 3972
651- 552- 4 1 0 0
F A X 6 5 1 - 5 5 2 - 4 1 9 0
T D D 6 5 1 - 3 2 2 - 2 3 2 3
ww w .c i ty of w s p . o r g
PERMIT REFUND PROCEDURE
1. Applicant must request a refund in writing someone in the Building Department:
a. Doug Whitney (Building Official)
i. dwhitney@wspmn.gov
b. Paul Swett (Building Inspector)
i. pswett@wspmn.gov
c. Grace Walmsley (Building Permit Clerk)
i. gwalmsley@wspmn.gov
2. Refund Calculations:
a. Pre-Issuance
i. If the project is canceled before the permit was approved, received
payment and then issued, the applicant can receive at most a refund of
80% of the permit fee.
ii. If a review was done there can be a percent of the plan review fee paid.
b. Post-Issuance
i. If the payment was collected and the permit was issued, the applicant
can receive at most a refund of 80% of the permit fee.
ii. If a plan review was done, the plan review fee cannot be refunded.
iii. If the surcharge has not been paid to the state, the fee of the surcharge
can be refunded
iv. If the surcharge has been paid to the state, the fee of the surcharge
cannot be refunded.
CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL BEFORE YOU
DIG! (651) 454-0002
IT’S THE LAW!
Type of Sign(s):
Number of Signs(s):
Wood
Chain-Link
Privacy
Pool Enclosure
Size:
Length: Width:
Construction Type:
Wood: Other:
Size:
Length: Width:
Construction Type:
Wood: Other:
Project Address:
Dates Sign(s) to be Displayed:
Rear:
Height:
Aluminum:
Aluminum:
Plastic
Iron
Kennel
SITE/OWNER
Name:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
CONTRACTOR
Company Name:
Side:
Setbacks:
Side:
Side:
Do you have an existing detached accessory building on your property? Yes __________ No _________
City of West St. Paul
Community Development Department - Phone: 651-552-4116 - FAX: 651-552-4190
1616 Humboldt Ave - West St Paul MN 551118
Zoning Permit Application
Permit Number: ZONE2017-_______
Application Date: _______________
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
State License #:
Contact Name:
TOTAL $
Project Description:
Temporary Sign: $25.00
Fence: $50.00
Accessory Building (under 200 Square Feet): $25.00
FEES
Platform/Deck (30" high or under and not attached to building) $75.00
Other:
Height:
Height:
Materials:
Type:
Setbacks:
Side:
Rear:
Other:
Decorative
Location of Sign(s):
Signature: _____________________________________________
Date: _________________
PROJECT INFORMATION
Appendix D
Other Cities Comparison
WENCK File #1305-0026
April 7, 2017
Prepared by:
WENCK Associates, Inc.
1800 Pioneer Creek Center
Maple Plain, MN 55359
Phone: 763-479-4200
Fax: 763-479-4242
Environmental Resources
14955 Galaxie Avenue
Apple Valley, Minnesota
55125
Prepared for:
Dakota County
Alameda, California
Austin, Texas
Seattle, Washington
Minneapolis, Minnesota
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
April/2017
i
C:\Users\BraSM0705\Desktop\B1305-0026_City Code Inventory Outline.docx
Table of Contents
1.0 FIVE CITIES COMPARISON ......................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Alameda, California ............................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Austin, Texas ...................................................................................... 1-5
1.3 Seattle, Washington ............................................................................ 1-7
1.4 Minneapolis, Minnesota ...................................................................... 1-13
1.5 St. Louis Park, Minnesota ................................................................... 1-15
1-1
1.0 Five Cities Comparison
Wenck researched and identified mechanisms used by five other cities in the state or nation
that have demonstrated effective diversion in the commercial/multiunit sectors. Selected
cities are of similar size and characteristics as Dakota County cities. Cities researched were:
Alameda, California
Austin, Texas
Seattle, Washington
Minneapolis, Minnesota
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Overall, cities with strong mandates and enforcement show the highest diversion rates.
Additionally, cities that carve out exceptions to commercial recycling mandates show lower
diversion rates. For example, cities that provide exceptions for existing buildings have lower
recycling rates compared to cities without such exclusions.
1.1 ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA
California state law has established the goal to reduce solid waste disposal by no less than
75 percent through recycling or composting by the year 2020. While it’s the intent of the
Legislature to allow local jurisdictions the flexibility to develop and maintain solid waste
recycling programs, state law sets a basic outline for solid waste reduction in commercial
and multifamily properties.
Since the late 1980’s, California has worked to divert waste from its landfills through local
recycling programs.
1
Local jurisdictions have been required by state law to implement a
recycling program appropriate for that jurisdiction designed to divert commercial solid waste
from businesses.
Since 2012, multifamily residential dwellings of five units or more have been required to
arrange for recycling services, consistent with state or local laws and requirements. The
multifamily property owner must take at least one of the following actions:
Source separate recyclable materials from solid waste and subscribe to a basic level
of recycling service that includes collection, self-hauling, or other arrangements for
the pickup of the recycling materials and/or
Subscribe to a recycling service that may include mixed waste processing that yields
diversion results comparable to source separation.
Property owners can require tenants to source separate their recyclable materials to aid in
compliance with the law.
Organic Waste and Composting
1
California Integrated Waste Management Act Chapter 1095, Stats 1989, established a framework
for solid waste planning and solid waste facility and landfill compliance.
1-2
Beginning in April 2016, a new series of mandates and timelines go into effect that require
businesses, including multifamily properties of five units or more, that generate organic
waste to arrange for recycling services
2
. The timeline is as follows:
On and after April 1, 2016, a business including a multifamily residential dwelling of
five units or more, that generate 8 cubic yards or more of organic waste per week
must arrange for recycling services specifically for organic waste.
One and after January 1, 2017, a business, including a multifamily residential
dwelling of five units or more, that generates 4 cubic yards or more of organic waste
per week must arrange for recycling services.
On and after August 1, 2017, jurisdictions must provide information about their
organic waste recycling program implementation in the annual resort submitted to
the California Department of Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle).
Fall 2018, after receipt of the 2016 annual reports submitted to CalRecycle on
August 1, 2017, CalRecycle will conduct a formal review of those communities that
are on a two-year review cycle.
3
January 1, 2019, businesses that generate 4 cubic yards or more of commercial solid
waste per week shall arrange for organic waste recycling services.
Fall 2020, after receipt of the 2019 annual reports submitted to CalRecycle on
August 1, 2020, CalRecycle will conduct a formal review of all jurisdictions.
Summer/Fall 2021, If CalRecycle determines that the statewide disposal of organic
waste in 2020 has not been reduced by 50-percent of the level of disposal during
2014, the organic recycling requirements on businesses will expand to cover
businesses that generate 2 cubic yards or more of commercial solid waste per week.
Additionally, certain exemptions may no longer be available if this target is not met.
California Proposition 67 (2014 SB 270 banning single-use plastic bags)
State statute that was approved by voter ballot referendum 67 that prohibits grocery and
other stores from providing single-use plastic or paper carryout bags but permits sale of
recycled paper bags and reusable bags. The law also requires a 10-cent minimum charge
for recycled paper bags, reusable plastic bags and compostable bags at certain locations.
The City of Alameda County’s Solid Waste and Recycling Ordinance mirrors the
requirements of Alameda County.
Alameda County, California
Alameda County Waste Reduction and Recycling Act of 1990
In 1990 Alameda County voters approved Measure D, the Alameda County Waste Reduction
and Recycling Act of 1990. The purpose of the Act was to:
A. Provide for an Alameda County Source Reduction and Recycling Plan in conformance
with new state law requiring all cities and counties to plan, fund and implement a
comprehensive source reduction and recycling program.
2
AB 1826, Chesbro, Chapter 727, Stat 2014 of the State of California.
3
Details regarding CalRecycle’s jurisdictional review is available on the CalRecycle website:
http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/Reporting/Biennial.htm
1-3
B. Further by January 1, 1995 to meet the state-mandated goal of reducing by at least
25-percent the refuse landfilled in Alameda County and by January 1, 2000, meet
the state-mandated goal of 50-percent and set longer-term goals of refuse reduction
starting at 75-percent.
C. Ensure that the recycling plan provides for at least the following essential elements:
1. An Alameda County-wide Source Reduction Program to minimize the generation
of refuse;
2. Residential Recycling Programs to provide each Alameda County residence with
curbside pick-up of recyclable materials;
3. Commercial Recycling Programs to reduce the refuse disposal costs of businesses
and government agencies;
4. An Alameda County-wide Recycling Product Market Development Program to
create and strengthen stable market for recycled materials;
5. A Recycled Product Purchase Preference Program to further encourage recycled
materials markets by maximizing the amount of recycled products purchased by
County government agencies;
D. Fund the Recycling Plan by instituting a six dollar per ton surcharge on materials
disposed of in the Alameda County landfills;
E. Create an Alameda County Source Reduction and Recycling Board to coordinate the
Recycling Plan; and
F. Prohibit the incineration of refuse within Alameda County.
The 23-page Alameda County Waste Reduction and Recycling Act includes recycling policy
goals, recycling plan, a recycling fund, support for recycling programs, municipal rate
structures for collection, a source reduction program, residential recycling program,
commercial recycling program, a recycled product market development program, a recycled
product preference program for the County, a recycling board known as the Alameda
County Source Reduction and Recycling Board, and a prohibition to operate an incinerator
within Alameda County.
Alameda County Plant Debris Landfill Ban Ordinance 2008-01
The ACWMA Plant Debris Landfill Ban Ordinance requires landscape professionals, residents
and businesses to separate all plant debris from garbage. Those subscribing to 4 or more
cubic yards of weekly on-site garbage service must place plant debris in the designated
“organics” bin, and those who haul to their local facility must deposit plant debris in the
disposal facility’s designated “clean green” area. Plant debris includes grass, leaves,
shrubbery, vines and tree branches.
This Ordinance covers all cities and unincorporated areas in the County and applies to any
person or organization generating significant amounts of plant debris that hauls the material
to Alameda County disposal facilities or places the material in bins for collection, including:
1-4
Commercial and institutional (e.g. colleges, hospitals, park districts, golf courses)
customers subscribing to 4 or more cubic yards of weekly solid waste collection
service.
Landscapers and gardeners
Municipalities
Alameda County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance 2012-01
The Alameda County Waste Management Authority (ACWMA) Mandatory Recycling
Ordinance, requires businesses, institutions, and multi-family properties with five or more
units to sort their recyclables from their trash. Multi-family property owners as well as
businesses and institutions that generate food waste, such as restaurants and grocery
stores, must also sort compostables from their trash. These requirements are effective
within participating areas of Alameda County.
For all commercial and institutional uses regardless of garbage service volume must:
1. Provide containers and service of sufficient number, size and frequency for recyclable
materials.
2. Businesses and institutions that generate significant quantities* of organics (food
scraps and/or compostable paper), such as restaurants and grocery stores: Provide
containers and service of sufficient number, size and frequency for organics.
3. Recycle all recyclable Covered Materials: cardboard, newspaper, white paper, mixed
recyclable paper, recyclable glass food and beverage containers, metal (aluminum
and steel) food and beverage containers, PET (#1) and HDPE (#2) plastic bottles.
4. Businesses and institutions that generate significant quantities* of organics, such as
restaurants and grocery stores: Place food scraps and compostable paper in separate
organics cart/bin for organics collection.
5. Ensure recycling and organics containers are contamination free. Only recyclable
materials may be placed in recycling containers and only organics may be placed in
organics containers.
6. Provide information at least annually to employees, tenants, and contractors
describing how to properly use the recycling, garbage, and organics containers, as
well as no later than 14 days after move-in and no less than 14 days prior to move-
out of tenant businesses.
*The Ordinance prohibits the disposal of any food scraps or compostable paper in the
garbage. However, for practical use, organics are considered to be “significant” when 10 or
more gallons are disposed of in a garbage cart or 20 or more gallons of organics are
disposed of in a garbage bin.
Citations are issued to businesses and multi-family property owners in violation of the
Mandatory Recycling Ordinance. Administrative citations are issued after at least two
official notices have been mailed. Citations are issues for: throwing away
recyclables/organics) per the Ordinance, putting garbage in the recycling/organics
containers or not subscribing to recycling/organics collection services and a waiver or
certification of recycling form has not been submitted or approved.
Section 11 of the Mandatory Recycling Ordinance has a fine schedule. The ordinance does
provide a process of for payment, appeal procedure, assistance to correct the violation and
further fines and charges for nonpayment.
1-5
Summary and Educational materials are available including free workbooks, guides, signs
and stickers. Currently offering free indoor food scrap bins for approved businesses. Free
business assistance is also available.
1.2 AUSTIN, TEXAS
Dakota County requested that Wenck review the City of Austin, Texas’s Universal Recycling
Ordinance including the phased-implementation for business and multi-family housing units.
Diversion Information
The City of Austin conducted a comprehensive diversion study in 2015 as part of its Zero
Waste initiative. The study concluded the overall diversion rate is 41.2-percent.
Approximately 15-percent of the total resource stream was from single family residential,
with approximately 85-percent sourced from the multifamily, commercial and industrial
sectors.
Approximately 37-percent of total waste in the land fill was comprised of organics. In
summary, almost 80-percent of total materials to the landfill could have been recycled or
composted. The study noted challenges to calculating the diversion rate included a limited
ability to track material generated and movement through the region, inconsistencies in
reporting methods and a lack of documented diversion quantities.
Universal Recycling Ordinance (URO)
On November 4, 2010, the Austin City Council approved the Universal Recycling Ordinance
(URO) which becomes effective October 1, 2012.
On April 25, 2013, Austin City Council approved amendments to the Universal Recycling
Ordinance to include all commercial and multi-family residential properties within the city
limits of Austin, Texas. This amendment also expanded efforts to include organics
diversion for any food enterprise that requires a food permit under Section 10 -3-61 of City
Code.
General Principles
The Universal Recycling Ordinance (URO) is designed to increase access to recycling and
organics diversion and encourage waste reduction for properties within the city limits of
Austin, Texas. Benefits may include one or more of the following:
Aid in the City of Austin's Zero Waste goal of achieving 75% diversion from landfills
by 2020 and 90% diversion by 2040 as defined in the October 2011 City Council
adopted Austin Resource Recovery Master Plan.
Increase the usable life of local landfills.
Reduce long-term costs to businesses and tax payers.
Reduce harmful environmental impacts.
Boost economic development and opportunities for source reduction.
Support implementation of the hierarchy of beneficial use of scrap food.
The Universal Recycling Ordinance Administrative Rules defines standards and
expectations for collecting recyclables and diverting organics at commercial and multi-
family residential properties as authorized by the Universal Recycling Ordinance (City
Code Chapter 15-6, Article V).
1-6
The URO requires affected property owners to ensure that residents, tenants, customers
and employees have convenient access to recycling
4
. Specifically, the ordinance requires
affected property owners to ensure:
Recycling for five materials at a minimum. Provide recycling for plastics #1 & #2,
paper, cardboard, glass, and aluminum. Substitute materials can be proposed on the
Annual Recycling Plan.
Sufficient collection-container capacity for multi-family and commercial properties.
All trash collection service containers (i.e. dumpsters, carts, or compactors) or other
collection points (i.e. chutes) should have a recycling container within 25 feet.
Annual Recycling Plans and record keeping. Requires an annual diversion plan
(recycling plan). Submit online each year between Oct. 1 and Feb. 1.
Informational signage in English and Spanish. All signs must indicate recyclable
materials accepted, use graphic illustrations, and include both English and Spanish.
Regular tenant and employee education. Educate new employees and tenants within
30 days of hire or move-in and annually thereafter.
Multifamily properties:
Recycling service capacity must ≥ 6.4 gallons per dwelling per week.
Commercial properties:
Make sure recycling capacity is equal to or larger than your total on site trash
capacity. Recycling capacity can include single-stream dumpster services as well as
any other diversion activities (reuse, repurpose, recycled, back-hauled, scrapped,
donated, or baled).
Phased approach toward implementation
All multifamily and commercial properties will be phased in over time. By October 1, 2017
all properties will be required to provide recycling services to their tenants and employees,
and properties with flood service permits will be required to provide food scrap diversion
programs. All properties are defined in the URO as Multifamily: apartments, condominiums,
mobile home parks and private funded dorms. Commercial office buildings: business office
properties, medical facilities, religious buildings and private educational facilities. Other
commercial properties: food and beverage industry (restaurants, bars, grocers, catering),
retail stores and grocers, hotels/motels and event facilities, industrial and manufacturing
facilities.
Date and entities that must comply with the requirements of the URO
Effective October 1, 2012 multifamily properties with greater than 75 dwelling units
and commercial office buildings larger than 100,000 square feet must comply.
Effective October 1, 2013 multifamily properties with greater than 50 dwelling units
and commercial office buildings larger than 75,000 square feet must comply.
Effective October 1, 2014 multifamily properties with greater than 25 dwelling units
and commercial office buildings larger than 50,000 square feet must comply.
4
The URO was adopted on November 4, 2010. Administrative Rules were approved in September
2012, and the URO was amended on April 25, 2013 after a collaborative stakeholder process.
1-7
Effective October 1, 2015 multifamily properties with greater than 10 dwelling units
and commercial office buildings larger than 25,000 square feet and other commercial
properties greater than 25,000 square feet must comply.
Effective October 1, 2016 all multifamily properties must comply, commercial office
buildings larger than 5,000 square feet, all other commercial properties greater than
5,000 square feet and other commercial properties with food service permits greater
than 5,000 square feet must comply.
Effective October 1, 2017, all properties must comply.
The Administrative Rules for the URO include specific recycling standards, exemption and
reporting requirements in addition to a process for submitting a recycling plan and an
application for a waiver.
Compliance and Enforcement
The Ordinance enables city staff to conduct a site visit through staff observation or public
complaint. If violation is found, a 30-day Notice of Deficiency is issued. Owner required to
correct deficiency and provide documentation to show compliance. Second and third Notice
of Deficiency may be required. After third notice, the matter is referred to the Austin Code
Department with potential fines up to $2,000 per day each day the violation continues.
Education and Outreach
Financial assistance was available. Rebates were available to commercial, multifamily units
and other commercial properties provided them met the following conditions:
Properties that were not yet affected by the phased approach to the URO, those
starting or expanding recycling, composting or donation services.
Properties that were affected by the URO, but were attempting to expand the Zero
Waste program elements beyond the minimum requirements.
Rebates cannot exceed $1,800 per eligible business location.
Limited to two franchise location per eligible company per calendar year.
Collection services must be provided through a licensed private hauler.
Single-Use Carryout Bag Ordinance & Administrative Rules (Chapter 15-6, Article 7)
The Austin City Council approved the Single-Use Carryout Bag Ordinance (SUBO), which
took effect March 1, 2013. The Single-Use Carryout Bag Ordinance regulates the types of
bags that can be distributed by business establishments in Austin and encourages a shift to
reusable bags. The ordinance does not eliminate all plastic or paper carryout bags and does
provide administration relief for alternative compliance, hardship or variance requests to the
ordinance.
1.3 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Diversion Information
City diversion goal is to achieve 60-percent recycling by 2015 and 70% by 2022 and
maintain this rate through 2050. Quarterly Recycling and Organics reporting is available on
their website. Annual Reports are available and published approximately 6-months after the
end of the year. Most current annual reporting regarding recycling rates is the 2015
summary, published July 1, 2016. The overall municipal solid waste recycling rate for 2015
1-8
was 58-percent. The single-family recycling rate for 2015 was 74.3-percent. The
commercial recycling rate for 2015 was 62.3-percent.
The multi-family recycling rate for 2015 was 36.8-percent.
King County, Washington’s County Code, Title 10.14 Waste Reduction Recycling and
Recovery states a County-wide goal to achieve zero waste of resources by 2030 through
“maximum feasible and cost-effective prevention, reuse and reduction of solid waste going
into its landfills and other processing facilities”. Further, the code states they shall establish
a program for waste reduction and recycling grants for cities, which includes the City of
Seattle. Cities that participate in the county’s solid waste system are eligible for grants
which promote one or more of the following: promote waste reduction and recycling,
implement and improve general recycling programs, encourage curbside collection of
recyclable materials, prevent toxic materials from entering the waste stream, improve
opportunities for curbside collection and recycling of organic materials, encourage
sustainable development through the promotion of sustainable building principles in
construction projects and broaden resource conservation programs that integrate with
waste reduction and recycling education efforts.
Specific to the City of Seattle, A Zero Waste Resolution (30990) was adopted by the City
Council on July 16, 2007 establishing new recycling goals for the City and provided direction
on waste-reduction programs and solid waste facilities. As is typical of city resolutions, the
Zero Waste Resolution (30990) provides history regarding the city’s commitment to solid
waste master planning, and recycling and reaffirmed is commitment to a 60-percent
recycling goal as well as building more efficient waste facilities.
The sections of the Resolution covered recycling and waste reduction goals, waste reduction
strategies, waste reduction actions, facility actions, and reporting. (Attach it)
Recycling & Waste Reduction Study - Zero Waste Study
This study, completed in 2007, evaluated both new strategies and existing programs
adopted previously under the guiding principle of “zero waste” as originally laid out in the
1998 Seattle Solid Waste Comprehensive Plan, "On the Path to Sustainability." Zero Waste
and collection strategies with the potential to divert significant tonnage away from landfill
disposal were identified.
Commercial
Seattle Municipal Code 21.36.082 requires commercial recycling. Highlights of the code
include:
As of January 1, 2005
All commercial establishments, including those hauling their own waste, shall
.separate paper (including paper cups), cardboard and yard waste for recycling, and
no paper, cardboard or yard waste shall be deposited in garbage containers or drop
boxes or disposed as garbage at the City's transfer stations.
As of July 1, 2014
All commercial establishments, including those hauling their own waste, shall
separate glass bottles and jars, plastic cups, bottles and jars, and aluminum and tin
cans for recycling, and no glass bottles and jars, plastic cups, bottles and jars, nor
aluminum or tin cans shall be deposited in garbage containers or drop boxes or
disposed as garbage at the City's transfer stations.
1-9
The Director of Seattle Public Utilities shall monitor commercial containers and
provide educational notices or tags for commercial garbage cans, detachable
containers and drop boxes with significant amounts of glass bottles and jars, plastic
cups, bottles and jars, and aluminum or tin cans.
As of January 1, 2015
All commercial establishments, including those hauling their own waste, shall
separate food waste and compostable paper for recycling, and no food waste or
compostable paper shall be deposited in garbage containers or drop boxes or
disposed as garbage at the City's transfer stations. All commercial establishments
that generate food waste or compostable paper shall subscribe to a composting
service, process their food waste onsite or self-haul their food waste for processing.
All building owners shall provide composting service for their tenants or provide
space for tenants' own food waste containers.
Exceptions to the ordinance include:
Existing commercial structures that do not have adequate storage space for
recyclable materials may be exempt from all or portions of this Section if so
determined by the Director of Seattle Public Utilities. The Director of Seattle Public
Utilities, in cases where space constraints are determined to exist, shall also evaluate
the feasibility of shared recycling containers by contiguous businesses or multifamily
structures.
New or Expanded Structures: New structures permitted in commercial zones that
have demonstrated difficulty in meeting the solid waste and recyclable materials
storage space specifications required under SMC Section 23.54.040 may be exempt
from all or portions of this Section as determined by the Director of Seattle Public
Utilities.
Commercial establishments are not responsible for recyclable materials deposited in
commercial garbage containers made available to the general public.
Any violation of the ordinance shall result in an additional collection fee of $50 per
collection.
Multiunit Residential
Seattle Municipal Code 21.36.083 requires residential recycling, regardless of housing
density. Highlights of the code include:
Regarding the recycling of paper, cardboard, glass, plastic aluminum and tin:
As of January 1, 2005, all residents living in single-family structures, multifamily
structures and mixed-use buildings shall separate paper, cardboard, glass and plastic
bottles and jars and aluminum and tin cans for recycling, and no paper, cardboard,
glass or plastic bottles and jars and aluminum or tin cans shall be deposited in a
garbage container or drop box or disposed as garbage at the City's transfer stations.
Regarding Enforcement of this section:
As of January 1, 2006, residential customers that self-haul their garbage shall be
prohibited from disposing of garbage with significant amounts of paper, cardboard, or
glass or plastic bottles or jars or aluminum or tin cans at the City's Recycling and
Disposal Stations.
1-10
Up through June 30, 2015, any violation of this section by residential curbside or
backyard customers shall result in refusal of curbside garbage collection services.
Residential customers shall be required to remove these items from garbage
containers before they will be collected.
As of July 1, 2015, any violation of this section by residential curbside or backyard
customers shall result in an additional collection fee of $1 per can collection.
Any violation of this section by detachable container and drop box customers shall
result in an additional collection fee of $50 per detachable or drop box collection.
Regarding the recycling of food waste and compostable paper
As of January 1, 2015, all residents living in single-family structures, multifamily
structures and mixed-use buildings shall separate food waste and compostable paper
for recycling, and no food waste or compostable paper shall be deposited in a
garbage container or drop box or disposed as garbage at the City's transfer stations.
The Director of Seattle Public Utilities is authorized to promulgate rules for purposes
of interpreting and clarifying the requirements.
Regarding Enforcement of this section:
As of October 1, 2014, the Director of Seattle Public Utilities shall begin a program of
educational outreach regarding the food waste and compostable paper recycling
requirements.
As of January 1, 2015, the Director of Seattle Public Utilities shall establish a program
of placing educational notices or tags on garbage containers with significant amounts
of food waste and compostable paper.
As of July 1, 2015, any violation of this section by residential curbside or backyard
customers shall result in an additional collection fee of $1 per can collection.
As of July 1, 2015, any violation of this section by detachable container and drop box
customers shall result in an additional collection fee of $50 per collection.
Exceptions to the ordinance include:
Existing structures: Existing multifamily structures that do not have adequate storage
space for recyclable materials may be exempt from all or portions of this ordinance if
so determined by the Director of Seattle Public Utilities. The Director of Seattle Public
Utilities, in cases where space constraints are determined to exist, shall also evaluate
the feasibility of shared recycling containers by contiguous businesses or multifamily
structures.
New or Expanded Structures: New multifamily structures permitted in commercial
zones or expanded multifamily structures that have demonstrated difficulty in meeting
the solid waste and recyclable materials storage space specifications required under
SMC Section 23.54.040 may be exempt from all or portions of this ordinance as
determined by the Director of Seattle Public Utilities.
Prohibition of Expanded Polystyrene food service products
Seattle Municipal Code 21.36.084 prohibits the use of expanded polystyrene food service
products. Highlights of the code include:
1-11
Effective January 1, 2009, food service businesses shall be prohibited from selling or
providing food, for consumption on or off the premises, in expanded polystyrene food
service products, except for
Prepackaged soups and other foods that food service businesses sell or otherwise
provide to their customers in expanded polystyrene containers that have been filled
and sealed prior to receipt by the food service businesses shall be exempt.
The prohibition on food service businesses selling or providing raw meat or raw
seafood, for consumption on or off the premises, in expanded polystyrene food service
products shall take effect on July 1, 2010.
Compostable Waste Program Requirements
Seattle Municipal Code 21.36.085 pertains to curbside compostable waste collection,
transfer station yardwaste requirements, and setout requirements for plastic bags and
compostable waste. Highlights of the code include: (ATTACH ORDINANCE)
Yardwaste shall not be mixed with garbage, refuse or rubbish for disposal.
Regarding curbside compostable waste collection, compostable waste for collection under
the City's curbside program shall be set apart from refuse for pickup in a manner that is
readily identifiable by the collectors. Only compostable waste generated at the dwelling unit
shall be collected at curbside.
Regarding transfer station yardwaste, all yardwaste delivered to the City's transfer stations
shall be separated from garbage, refuse and rubbish and deposited in an area designated
for yardwaste.
Regarding plastic bags and compostable waste, Compostable waste shall not be setout at
the curb for collection in plastic bags nor shall plastic bags containing yardwaste be
deposited in transfer station yardwaste collection areas or transfer trailers.
Compostable or Recyclable Food Service Ware Requirement
Seattle Municipal code 21.36.086 pertains to rules prohibiting the sale/use of disposal food
service ware. Highlights of the code include:
Effective July 1, 2010, food service businesses shall be prohibited from selling or
providing food, for consumption on or off the premises, in or with disposable food
service ware. Acceptable alternatives for prohibited disposable food service ware shall
be compostable or recyclable.
Food service businesses providing food for consumption on premises using
compostable or recyclable food service ware must provide conveniently located and
clearly marked containers where customers may discard compostable and recyclable
food service ware and must provide for the collection and delivery of these materials
to appropriate processing facilities.
Landlords of food service businesses subject to the requirements of this section shall
make adequate space and/or services available to such food service businesses for the
collection and pick up of the compostable and recyclable materials generated by such
food service businesses.
1-12
Landlords operating food courts or similar settings that include food service businesses
and common areas set aside and maintained for the consumption of food and
beverages shall provide in such common areas the services required in subsection B
of this section.
The Director of Seattle Public Utilities is authorized to promulgate rules for purposes
of interpreting and clarifying the requirements and may provide temporary waivers or
other relief that apply to use of certain food service ware products for a period of up
to one year.
Single-use Plastic Bag Ban
Seattle Municipal Ordinances 123775 and 125165 prohibit all Seattle retail stores from
providing single-use plastic bags. Highlights of the ordinances include:
Prohibits all Seattle retail stores from providing customers with single-use plastic
carryout (shopping) bags, including bags labeled “biodegradable,” “degradable,”
“decomposable” or similar.
Allows retail stores to provide customers with any size recyclable paper or reusable
carryout bags.
Requires retail stores to charge a minimum of 5 cents for large paper carryout bags
of 1/8 barrel (882 cubic inches) or larger. These are typical grocery bags with a flat
bottom greater than 60 square inches.
Prohibits all Seattle retail stores from providing customers with plastic bags (such as
produce bags) that are tinted green or brown.
Allows stores to provide approved compostable bags, and they must be colored
green or brown.
Requires retail stores to show all bag-charges on customer receipts; stores keep all
revenue. The charge is a taxable retail sale.
Allows retail stores, at their discretion, to charge for smaller bags or provide them
free.
Allows retail stores to provide carryout bags made of plastic 2.25 mil or thicker, with
or without charge at their discretion.
Requires that bags to which the 5-cent charge applies contain at least 40 percent
post-consumer recycled fiber and display the minimum recycled content on the
outside of the bag. Use of recycled fiber and labeling is encouraged for all sizes of
paper bags.
Imposes a $250 fine for violations.
Promotes reusable carryout bags as the best alternative to single-use plastic bags.
Exemptions
Customers using vouchers or electronic benefit cards from state or federal food
assistance programs for grocery purchases are exempt from the 5-cent large paper
bag fee.
Plastic bags used in stores for bulk items or to protect vegetables, meat, frozen
foods, flowers and similar items are exempt. Plastic bags cannot be green or brown
tinted. Approved compostable bags are permitted for these purposes.
Plastic or approved compostable bags used for take-out orders of prepared food from
restaurants are allowed.
Plastic dry-cleaner, newspaper and door-hanger bags are allowed but cannot be
tinted green or brown.
1-13
Plastic bags sold in packages containing multiple bags intended for use as garbage
bags or to contain pet waste, or approved compostable food and yard waste bags are
exempt.
Free city recycling is available for apartments, condominiums, co-ops, fraternities/sororities
and house boats. Education and outreach materials are available through the Seattle Public
Utilities Department, including materials printed in 18 languages for multi-family housing
and commercial businesses.
1.4 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
Diversion Information
The City of Minneapolis’s overall diversion rate in 2016 was 36.3-percent. 21.84-percent
was recycled, 15.09-percent was composted. All garbage not recycled or composted is
converted to electricity at the Hennepin Energy Recover Center (HERC). Regarding home
organics recycling, as of October, 2016 40-percent of residents have signed up for home
organics collection. Organics collection information goes beyond the scope of this review.
However, weblinks have been included.
Hennepin County has its own diversion goals, solid waste master planning documents and a
variety of initiatives and incentives. Since Dakota County is within the 7-County Metro Area
and Environmental Management staff are familiar with Hennepin County’s programs, it is
prudent to omit details regarding Hennepin County’s programs and policies.
Required recycling at multifamily housing
As of January 1, 1995, the City of Minneapolis requires by Ordinance (Chapter 225, Article
VI)-requires:
That every owner of a building with two or more dwelling units must provide by
contract with a licensed private collection vendor, recycling services, adequate
containers for all recyclable materials collected and distribute written information to
building tenants at the time of lease and at least annually thereafter regarding the
recycling program.
Further, each licensed hauler must provide annually and semiannually thereafter,
reports to the city engineer each address that is being provided recycling collection,
the weight of materials collected by during the reporting period by type of material,
(the aggregate figure reflecting total weight of all businesses served bv the owner or
vendor) and the recycling materials processing center or market for sale utilized for
the recyclable materials.
Enforcement enables the city engineer to make notice of compliance failure, required
10 days to compliance with the ordinance and provides penalty for noncompliance of
$100 first offense, $200 for second offense within 12-months of first offense, $450
for third offense within 12-months of first offense and $700 for the fourth and
subsequent offense within 12-months of the first offense.
Required recycling at commercial buildings
As of Sept. 1, 2011, all Minneapolis commercial and business property owners are required
to offer recycling (Chapter 174, Article IV). By ordinance, commercial property owners and
managers are required to provide:
1-14
Regular recycling collection (at least twice a month) for all materials generated
onsite deemed recyclable in Minneapolis, including paper, cardboard, metal, food and
beverage cans, plastic food and beverage containers, and glass bottles and jars.
Adequate recycling containers stored on the premises of the building in locations that
are convenient for the deposit and collection of recyclable materials by all tenants of
the building.
Recycling collection and storage areas.
Written recycling information and instructions distributed to each business or
commercial use located in the building annually.
A written recycling plan.
Enforcement enables the fire marshal and authorized representatives to mail a warning
notice stating they have 10 business days to comply. Failure to comply is subject to an
administrative penalty pursuant to Chapter 2 and the schedule of civil fines adopted by the
City Council. Further, failure to comply may constitute cause for denial, suspension,
revocation or refusal to issue the certificate of commercial building registration.
Single-use Plastic Bag Prohibition and Recyclable Paper Carryout Bag Requirement
(Ordinance 2016-028 and City Code 225, Garbage and Refuse, Article VII)
Purpose of Ordinance and Code is to reduce litter, waste, lifecycle environmental impacts
and negative impacts on recycling facilities of single-use and incentivize Minneapolis
customers to use recyclable bags. Effective June 1, 2017.
Single-use plastic carryout bags are prohibited. No retail establishment can provide single-
use plastic bags to customers. Further, no retail establishment can provide paper bags that
are not recyclable. There is a pass-through charge from retailers to customers for providing
recyclable paper bags or reusable plastic bags which is retained by retailers to offer the cost
of bags and other costs related to the pass-through charge. (Reusable is defined).
Enforcement and Penalty enables the director of community planning and economic
development, the director of public works, the commissioner of health, the director of
regulatory services, the licensing official and the authorized representatives of those officials
to assist with enforcement. Violations are enforced as administrative offenses as outlined in
Chapter 2 of the Minneapolis Code, through administrative citations. Further it can be
enforced by injunction, abatement, mandamus or any other appropriate civil, administrative
or criminal remedy.
Environmental Preservation: Environmentally Acceptable Packaging Requirement (Title 10
Food Code, Chapter 204)
Purpose of Code is to regulate food and beverage packaging for immediate consumption as
waste generated is a significant and growing portion of the waste stream.
Requires that owning/operating a food establishment or providing free food or beverages for
immediate consumption that require permit or license must use environmentally acceptable
packaging. Packaging, environmentally acceptable packaging, and flood establishment are
defined.
Rules and regulations enables the Environmental Health Division to develop rules and
regulations that may be necessary to carry out the purposes of the code. Enforcement is
through the Environmental Health Division of the Health Department. The “license official”
1-15
has the authority to enforce the provisions of the code and cites a number of ordinances
and code references to that end.
1.5 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
Diversion Information
The City of St. Louis Park does not have any current waste diversion information available.
There is an 2009 Recycling Recovery Rate Study that was conducted but due to the age of
the document, diversion data will not be included.
Multi-family recycling (City Code Chapter 22, Division 3. Recycling For Multiple-Family
Residential Structures)
Requires mandatory separation of recyclables for structures consisting of five or more
apartments, townhomes, condominiums, or other living units.
Separation and Storage
It is the responsibility of owners to have recycling containers available and accessible, and
provide recycling collection services at least twice each month to all residents.
Every resident must separate recyclables from all refuse, and must store recyclables in
containers designated for the storage of recyclables.
Containers with tight fitting lids for storage of recyclables shall be kept in the same location
as refuse containers.
Collection and City Reporting
Collection is by a licensed hauler under contract by property owner or property manager. If
requested by City Manager or designee upon written request on forms prescribed, provide
information to the program for separation, storage, and collection of recyclables. The
owners or managers of each complex shall post and provide this information and additional
educational material regarding recycling to residents of the complex.
Enforcement
City Code Chapter 22 Solid Waste Management is generally silent regarding enforcement
mechanism for recycling.
Regarding the collection of garbage and refuse within the city, all garbage and refuse at any
residential dwelling shall be collected, conveyed and disposed of by the city shall under the
supervision of the director of public works. The city manager has the authority to make
regulations. Any person aggrieved by a regulation of, or fee charged by the city manager
shall have the right of appeal to the city council which shall have the authority to confirm,
modify or revoke any such regulation or fee.
Commercial Building Recycling
Currently, the City of St. Louis Park references the State Statute that as of January 1, 2016
owner of commercial buildings within the 7-county metro area that generate four cubic
yards or more of trash per week must recycle at least three materials.
2017 Draft Solid Waste Management Ordinance (Chapter 22): inclusion of commercial
recycling, including organics.
In 2017, it’s the intent of the City to pass an amendment to the currently Solid Waste
Management Ordinance (Chapter 22) to include a section pertaining to recycling for new or
significantly remodeled commercial structures including at point of sale. The following are
notable elements of the draft ordinance.
1-16
Separation and Storage of Recyclables
Means test of guidance versus prescriptive requirements. Utilizes terms such as
“accessible” as in, “…for the collection of recyclables available and accessible to all tenants
at all times…”
“proximity” as in, “containers and/or chutes for the collection and storage of recyclables
shall be located in close proximity to garbage containers and/or chutes.
Separation and Storage of Source-separated Organic Material
Organics recycling based on the Hennepin County license category of “Medium Food Small
Menu”, “High Food- Small Facility” or “High Food – Large Facility”.
Service Capacity and Hauling
“Service capacity” is not a prescriptive, formulaic size other that for the combined
recyclables and source-separated organic materials, it must be equal to or greater than the
service capacity for garbage.
The “Responsible Party” as defined by the ordinance, shall report to the City upon written
request such information relative to the program for separation, storage and collection of
recyclables and source separated organic material for the complex.
Signage and Education
Each container or chute designed for collection or recyclables shall be located with a sign
that includes: the universal chasing arrows recycling symbol, images depicting examples of
materials accepted, and the term”recycling”.
Each container or chute designated for collection of source-separated organic material shall
be labeled with a sign that includes: imagine depicting examples of materials accepted and
the terms “organics recycling” or “compostables”.
The responsible party shall provide educational material and instructions related to the
collection of recyclables, source-separated organic material and garbage to each business,
tenant, or organization newly located on the premises not late than the 30
th
day after a
change in occupancy; and all occupancies at the premises not later than the 30
th
day after a
change in the materials accepted in a recycling or organics recycling program.
Disposal
Recyclables and source-separated organic material collected from commercial buildings for
the purposes of recycling and/or organics recycling shall not in any event be: disposed in
any landfill, burned in any waste-to-energy facility, or deposited or distributed in any way or
manner contrary to applicable law, statute, ordinance, rule or regulation.
Zero Waste Packaging Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2485-15) Ordinance To Increase
Traditional Recycling And Organics Recycling Of Food and Beverage Packaging and To-Go
Containers
Adopted in 2015 with an effective date of January 1, 2017, the Zero Waste Packaging
Ordinance requires that all licensed food establishments use packaging that is reusable,
recyclable, or compostable when serving food and beverages that are intended for
immediate consumption, regardless of where the item is consumed (onsite or taken to-go).
Further, businesses that utilize single-use packaging in-house must have an on-site
opportunity to collect the packaging. Recycling collection is required for any recyclable
packaging and organics collection is required for any compostable packaging. Catering
services are exempt until January 1, 2018. Additional exclusions are within the ordinance.
1-17
Enforcement and Penalty defines violations as a misdemeanor and punishable under City
Code 2420-12, Section 1014 Administrative Penalties as follows: first offense, written
warning, second offense $100 fine, repeated offense within 24 months, a fine double the
amount of the fine imposed previously up to maximum of $2,000. Offender given 14-caledar
days to take corrective action or additional fine is issued.
The Public Works Division may develop rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of
the ordinance.
Plastic Bag Ban (Tabled until further notice)
The St. Louis Park City Council considered regulation of single-use carryout plastic bags in
the city. Council has discussed how a policy on single-use carryout plastic bags might help
the city meet some of the following goals: increased recycling/composting and waste
reduction, minimization of litter, reducing greenhouse gasses and increasing product reuse.
Council has heard from industry experts, residents and business owners.
Several options were considered. The most recent option included charging a small fee for
both plastic and paper single-use carryout bags and requiring at-store plastic bag recycling
programs. At Special Study Session Discussions held in 2015 and 2016, the St. Louis Park
City Council chose to set aside action on single-use plastic bags. The council may choose to
revisit the plastic bag issue in the future and in the meantime, encourages residents to
bring their own bags when shopping and recycle plastic bags at retail location.
Toll Free: 800-472-2232 Email: wenckmp@wenck.com Web: wenck.com