MEMORANDUM
1
DRAFT AWAITING REVIEW AND INPUT FROM THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCING FEDERAL NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT PRACTITIONERS TO
THE
INDIANA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT PROCESS
This fact sheet is designed to familiarize Federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
practitioners with the Indiana Environmental Policy Act (IEPA). When a proposed NEPA action
also requires compliance with IEPA, it is critical that these practitioners familiarize themselves
with IEPA and understand how IEPA compares to and contrasts with NEPA.
Both statutes are designed to facilitate informed decision-making and environmental review.
IEPA requires that State agencies study the environmental consequences of their actions,
including permitting and financial assistance. It also requires them to take all feasible measures
to avoid, minimize, and mitigate damage to the environment. This fact sheet compares IEPA and
the resulting Indiana Code Title 13, Section 12, Chapter 4 (IC) and Indiana Administrative Code
Title 326 Article 16 with CEQ’s regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of
NEPA, 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508.
This fact sheet only provides basic information and is intended to serve as a springboard for
discussion with Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) staff when proposed
projects trigger both Federal and State environmental review requirements. Project proponents
are strongly encouraged to contact IDEM in the early stages of project planning so that Federal
and state environmental review processes, if applicable, can be appropriately aligned.
Introduction
The IAC requires State agencies to consider the impact of governmental actions on the
environment to “encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between humans and the
environment.” IC 13-12-4-1(1). Since 1972, IEPA has mandated the completion of
environmental impact statements for applicable State actions. Some actions that require the
IEPA process include projects or programs that are entirely or partly financed, assisted,
implemented, conducted, regulated, or approved by State agencies; adoption of administrative
rules; and approval of specific projects, such as construction or management activities located in
a defined geographic area. 326 IAC 16-2.1-4. Some actions are excluded by the statute,
including: administrative procurements, contracts for consulting services, personnel actions,
repair or maintenance of existing structures, and basic data collection, research and experimental
management, resource evaluation activities that do not result in significant disturbance to the
environment, and the issuance of a license or permit by an agency of the State. 326 IAC 16-1-
3(d)(1-5); (f)(1). Any agency’s actions which are not excluded by the statute must undergo the
IEPA Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process.
MEMORANDUM
2
Key Points of Comparison
The table below compares NEPA terms and procedural requirements to IEPA terms and
procedural requirements set forth in IAC and IC.
NEPA
IEPA
Categorical Exclusion, 40 CFR 1508.4, 40
CFR 1507.3
Categorical Exclusion, 326 IAC 16-1-3(e).
Environmental Assessment (EA), 40 CFR
1508.9, 40 CFR 1501.3
Environmental Assessment (EA), 326 IAC 16-
2.1-2(a).
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI),
40 CFR 1508.13
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), 326
IAC 16-2.1-2(a)(1)(B).
Notice of Intent, 40 CFR 1508.22
N/A
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS), 40 CFR 1502, 40 CFR 1508.11
N/A
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS), 40 CFR 1502, 40 CFR 1508.11
Environmental Impact Statement, 326 IAC 16-
2.1-3.
Record of Decision, 40 CFR 1505.2
N/A
The bullets below provide a general comparison of processes:
IEPA has a process that is similar to categorical exclusions in NEPA. 40 CFR 1508.4, 40
CFR 1507.3; 326 IAC 16-1-3(e). In both IEPA and NEPA, categorical exclusions are
actions that an agency considers to be minor and in both statutes the head agency (CEQ
for NEPA and IDEM for IEPA) has the opportunity to comment on the list of categorical
exclusions.
NEPA and IEPA both require EAs and EISs to be made available to the public, but IEPA
does not require public comment during the creation of these documents like NEPA. 40
CFR 1502.1; 326 IAC 16-1-4(b)(1). IEPA and NEPA both require EISs to be formed in
consultation with and with the comments of each agency that has jurisdiction or special
expertise. 40 CFR 1502.9(a); 326 IAC 16-201-3.
Both NEPA and IEPA require an EIS to include the action’s environmental, social, and
historic impacts; considered alternatives; and irreversible commitments of resources. 326
IAC 16-2.1-3, 326 IAC 16-2.1-6(4); 40 CFR 1502.16. Unlike NEPA, however, IEPA
directly emphasizes the importance of considering the relationship between “local, short-
term uses of the environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term
productivity.” 326 IAC 16-2.1-3(4).
State agencies that must comply with NEPA do not need to complete an additional
process for IEPA unless the action requires State legislation or State appropriations. If a
Federal statement has been prepared and the action does not require State legislation or
appropriations, the IDEM does not mandate additional IEPA documentation and will
accept a NEPA document. 326 IAC 16-1-3(f)(2).
MEMORANDUM
3
Contact Information and Resources
Bruno Pigott, Chief of Staff
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Phone: (317) 233-2550
Email: bpigott@idem.in.gov
IDEM Office:
100 North Senate Avenue IGCN 1301
Indianapolis, IN 46204
IDEM Contact Information:
Phone: (317) 232-8603 (main number)
IDEM website: http://www.in.gov/idem/