137
CHAPTER 5 Road to Independence
Many colonists, especially those living in
Boston, felt that the British had pushed them too
far. First the British had passed a series of laws
that violated colonial rights. Now they had sent
an army to occupy colonial cities.
To make matters worse, the soldiers stationed
in Boston acted rudely and sometimes even vio-
lently toward the colonists. Mostly poor men,
the redcoats earned little pay. Some of them
stole goods from local shops or scuffled with
boys who taunted them in the streets. The sol-
diers competed off-hours for jobs that Bostoni-
ans wanted. The townspeople’s hatred for the
soldiers grew stronger every day.
The Boston Massacre
Relations between the redcoats and the
Boston colonists grew more tense. Then on
March 5, 1770, the tension finally reached a
peak. That day a fight broke out between towns-
people and soldiers. While some British officers
tried to calm the crowd, one man shouted,
“
We did not send for you. We will not have you
here. We’ll get rid of you, we’ll drive you away!
”
The angry townspeople moved through the
streets, picking up any weapon they could
find—sticks, stones, shovels, and clubs. They
pushed forward toward the customshouse on
King Street.
As the crowd approached, the sentry on duty
panicked and called for help. The crowd
responded by throwing stones, snowballs, oyster
shells, and pieces of wood at the soldiers. “Fire,
you bloodybacks, you lobsters,” the crowd
screamed. “You dare not fire.”
After one of the soldiers was knocked down,
the nervous and confused redcoats did fire. Sev-
eral shots rang out, killing five colonists. One
Bostonian cried out:
“
Are the inhabitants to be knocked down in the
streets? Are they to be murdered in this manner?
”
Among the dead was Crispus Attucks, a
dockworker who was part African, part Native
American. The colonists called the tragic
encounter the Boston Massacre.
The Word Spreads
Colonial leaders used news of the killings as
propaganda—information designed to influence
opinion—against the British. Samuel Adams put
up posters describing the “Boston Massacre” as a
slaughter of innocent Americans by bloodthirsty
redcoats. An engraving by Paul Revere showed a
British officer giving the order to open fire on
an orderly crowd. Revere’s powerful image
strengthened anti-British feeling.
The Boston Massacre led many colonists to call
for stronger boycotts on British goods. Aware of
the growing opposition to its policies, Parliament
repealed all the Townshend Acts taxes except the
one on tea. Many colonists believed they had
won another victory. They ended their boycotts,
except on the taxed tea, and started to trade with
British merchants again.
Some colonial leaders, however, continued
to call for resistance to British rule. In 1772
Samuel Adams revived the Boston
committee of
correspondence,
an organization used in earlier
protests. The committee circulated writings about
colonists’ grievances against Britain. Soon other
committees of correspondence sprang up through-
out the colonies, bringing together protesters
opposed to British measures.
; (See page 596 of the
Primary Sources Library for readings about colonial resistance.)
Explaining How did the Boston
Massacre contribute to the repeal of the Townshend Acts?
The British soldiers never stood trial for the massacre.
Eight soldiers and the commanding officer at the Boston
Massacre were jailed and tried for murder. Many Patriots
thought it was an act of disloyalty to defend the soldiers.
The soldiers’ hopes for justice rested in the hands of
John Adams, who believed that even the enemy should
be given a fair trial. Two of the soldiers were found
guilty of manslaughter. The others were found not guilty
on grounds of self-defense. Some Patriots questioned
Adams’s loyalty; others argued that the trial showed
even the hated redcoats could receive a fair trial.
The Boston Massacre