Fillable Concurrent Faculty Site Visit Evaluation

Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank Concurrent Faculty Site Visit Evaluation Form

Use Fill to complete blank online ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY pdf forms for free. Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. All forms are printable and downloadable.

Concurrent Faculty Site Visit Evaluation

On average this form takes 25 minutes to complete

The Concurrent Faculty Site Visit Evaluation form is 5 pages long and contains:

  • 0 signatures
  • 34 check-boxes
  • 83 other fields

Country of origin: US
File type: PDF

U.S.A. forms for Arkansas Tech University

BROWSE ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FORMS

Related forms
Fill has a huge library of thousands of forms all set up to be filled in easily and signed.
Fill in your chosen form
Sign the form using our drawing tool
Send to someone else to fill in and sign.
find another form
 
1
Arkansas Tech University
Concurrent Site Visit Evaluation Form
In accordance with the requirements set forth by the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board
Policy 5.16, a site evaluation must be performed by a designated faculty member once per year for each
course offered. AHECB accreditation is mandated by the Department of Higher Education. As the
chosen faculty member for the concurrent site visit, we would like to express our gratitude for your
university service and continued help in building strong relationships with our partnering schools. The
site evaluation form must be completed within one week of your site visit. Upon completion, please
return all forms to the main campus Office of Admissions/Doc Bryan Suite 141.
Faculty/Site Evaluator:
Department of Faculty/Site Evaluator:
Adjunct Instructor Being Evaluated:
High School Being Evaluated:
Evaluation Location:
Concurrent Enrollment Course Reviewed:
Date and Time of Visit:
Concurrent Site Visit Faculty Evaluation:
Class Makeup
Number of students receiving concurrent credit enrolled in the class
Number of students not receiving concurrent credit enrolled in the class
Total number of students enrolled in the class
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Class Makeup
The class follows AHECB Policy 5.16
which states that “classes with a
mixed population must have at least a
majority of the students enrolled for
concurrent credit.”
All students enrolled in
the course are
receiving college credit
through ATU.
A majority of the
students enrolled in
the course are
receiving college
credit through ATU.
A majority of the
students enrolled in the
course are receiving
college credit through
ATU. Concerns are
reported that some of
the students who are in
the course for high
school credit only are
not capable of
producing college level
work and are not able
to meet the same
requirements for the
completion of the
course.
A majority of the
students enrolled in
the course are not
receiving college
credit through ATU.
The class does not
follow the policy laid
out by the Arkansas
Higher Education
Coordinating Board.
Notes (Highlights/Suggestions):
2
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Instructional Delivery
Content is delivered in such a way
that students are able to retain and
apply that content.
Consider the effectiveness of:
Resources provided to aid
in learning
Questions asked to gauge
learning
Hands-on applications of
concepts
Quantity and complexity of
information delivered (too
much/too little)
Instructional delivery
methods effectively
engage students in
such a way that they
are able to effectively
retain and apply the
content.
Instructional delivery
methods engage
motivated students in
such a way that they
are able to effectively
retain and apply the
content; less
motivated students
may struggle.
Instructional delivery
methods make it
challenging for even the
most motivated
students to retain and
apply the content.
Instructional delivery
methods are
significantly
ineffective, seriously
affecting students’
ability to retain and
apply the content.
Notes (Highlights/Suggestions):
Graded Coursework and Materials
Yes No
Instructor has provided the evaluator with a sufficient amount of graded material
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Graded Coursework
The graded coursework mirrors ATU’s
main campus counterpart. Graded
material would include, but is not
limited to, homework, papers,
portfolios, labs, quizzes, tests, etc.
Coursework and
grades mirror ATU’s
counterpart.
Coursework and
grades are similar to
ATU’s counterpart.
Coursework and grades
loosely resemble ATU’s
counterpart.
Coursework and
grades deviate from
ATU’s counterpart in
that the material is
not being addressed
or appropriately
graded.
Notes (Highlights/Suggestions):
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Applied to Teaching
It is noticeable through the
observation of the course that the
instructor keeps up to date within the
industry through discipline-specific
professional development,
involvement in that field, or by other
means. The instructor applies that
knowledge to the class appropriately.
Instructor is current
within the industry and
appropriately applies
that knowledge to the
class.
Instructor is current
within the industry
and occasionally
applies that
knowledge to the
class.
Instructor is current
within the industry, but
rarely applies that
knowledge to the class.
Instructor is not
current within the
industry and teaches
material that is not up
to date with current
trends.
Notes (Highlights/Suggestions):
3
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Classroom Management
Students behave in a way that is
reflective of the ATU Concurrent
Student Handbook and the instructor
maintains a positive and professional
learning environment.
Students are
enthusiastically
engaged in relevant
course activities and
are behaving
appropriately; the
instructor creates a
constructive learning
environment.
Most students are
engaged in relevant
course activities and
are behaving
appropriately; the
instructor is dealing
effectively with those
who are not.
Few students are
actively engaged in
relevant course
activities, and/or
behaving appropriately;
the teacher’s efforts to
manage student
behavior are not
effective.
Students are not
engaged in relevant
course activities and
are not behaving
appropriately; the
teacher is doing little
to manage their
behavior.
Notes (Highlights/Suggestions):
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Facilities/Equipment
Instructor utilizes appropriate
instructional resources including
computers in conjunction with the
material being taught in the
classroom.
Students have access
to resources and a
sufficient number of
computers that are up-
to-date.
Students have access
to resources and a
sufficient number of
computers that are
satisfactory for the
course.
Students have limited
access to resources
and computers OR
they are outdated.
Students do not have
access to resources
and computers.
Notes (Highlights/Suggestions):
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Textbooks
/Class Material
Instructor utilizes appropriate
instructional resources including
approved textbooks OR material in
conjunction with what is being taught
in the classroom.
The instructor is
teaching material from
the same textbook OR
material used in ATU
main campus courses.
The instructor is
teaching from an ATU
department approved
textbook OR material
that aligns with what is
used in ATU main
campus courses.
The instructor is
teaching from an
outdated textbook OR
material that does not
align with the content
of what is used in ATU
main campus courses.
The instructor is not
using a textbook OR
material that has been
approved by the ATU
department head.
Notes (Highlights/Suggestions):
4
Performance Level
Exceeds Minimum
Requirements
Meets Minimum
Requirements
Problematic Unacceptable
Course Consistency
The course is consistent with the ATU
main campus counterpart. The
delivery and content is being
administered at the university level.
The course is being
taught in a way that is
consistent with the
ATU main campus
counterpart. The
instructor’s delivery
and content is being
administered at the
university level.
The course is being
taught in a way that is
similar to the ATU
main campus
counterpart. The
instructor’s delivery
and content will
sometimes vary from
the university level.
The course is being
taught in a way that is
inconsistent with the
ATU main campus
counterpart. The
instructor’s delivery
and content is rarely
being administered at
the university level.
The course is not
being taught in a way
that is consistent with
the ATU main campus
counterpart. The
instructor’s delivery
and content is
insufficient to be
considered at the
university level.
Notes
(Highlights/Suggestions):
This space is available for you to summarize your experience during your site visit.
Any concerns that you feel are prohibitive to the class being administered at the university level that
need to be addressed:
5
Additional comments:
Download
Save PDF to desktop
Email
Email completed PDF
Send for Signing
Email for others to sign
Print
Print document
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it
Want to add a signature?
You can add a signature field
and assign it to someone else
to sign
Choose a Field
Click on a field and
select the person that should complete it

Concurrent Faculty Site Visit Evaluation

This document is locked as it has been sent for signing.

You have successfully completed this document.

Other parties need to complete fields in the document. You will recieve an email notification when the document has been completed by all parties.

This document has been signed by all parties.

Completed 26 February 2020

Message

View Audit Log
Print With Audit Log
Duplicate Document