Form 3-Page
4
Rev. 09/19
C. Objective evidence indicating that current impairment from the symptoms is observable
in two or more settings. There must be clear evidence of clinically significant impairment
within the academic setting. However, there must also be evidence that these
problems are not confined to
the academic setting. Explain how the impairment restricts
access to the bar exam and justifies the specific accommodation requests.
D. A determination that the symptoms of AD/HD are not a function of some other mental
disorder (such as a mood, anxiety, or personality disorder, psychosis, substance abuse,
low cognitive ability, etc.).
E. Indication of the specific AD/HD diagnostic subtype: predominantly inattentive type,
hyperactive-impulsive type, combined type, or not otherwise specified.
III. FORMAL TESTING
Psychological testing and self-report checklists cannot be used as the sole indicator of AD/HD
diagnosis independent of history and interview. However, such findings can augment clinical
data. They are particularly necessary to rule out intellectual limitation as an alternative
explanation for academic difficulty, to describe type and severity of learning problems, and to
assess the severity of cognitive deficits associated with AD/HD (inattention, working memory,
etc.).
1. Is there evidence from empirically validated rating scales completed by more than one source
that levels of AD/HD symptoms fall in the abnormal range? Yes No
If yes, please provide copies.
2. Is there evidence from empirically validated rating scales completed by more than one source
that the applicant has been significantly impaired by AD/HD symptoms? Yes No
If yes, briefly describe the findings.
3. Was testing performed that rules out cognitive factors as reasonable explanations for
complaints of inattention, distractibility, poor test performance, or academic problems?
Yes No
If yes, briefly describe the findings.