California State University, Fresno
UNIVERSITY-WIDE PEER EVALUATION FORM
Professor Evaluated:_______________________________________
Rank:___________________ Course:_______________________ Term/Year:___________
Date of Classroom Visitation:______________
Name of Evaluator_________________________ Signature:_________________________
Ratings Scale: 5 = superior | 4 = above average | 3 = average | 2 = below average | 1 = weak
Additional comments may be included on the reverse side of this form.
APM 322c
Category Rating (1-5)
A. Course Content. The assessment of course content shall include a review of the
currency of the content of a course, the appropriateness of the level of the content of a
course, and the appropriateness of the sequencing of the content to best achieve the
learning objectives for the course.
COMMENTS:
B. Instructional Design. The assessment of the instructional design of the course shall
include a review of learning objectives, syllabi, instructional support materials,
organization of lectures, and the use of technology appropriate to the class.
COMMENTS:
C. Instructional Delivery. The assessment of delivery shall include a review of oral
presentation skills, written communication skills, skills using various forms of informational
technology, and the ability to create an overall environment conducive to student learning.
COMMENTS:
D. Assessment Methods. The evaluation of assessment methods shall consist of a
review of the tools, procedures, and strategies used for measuring student learning, and
providing timely and meaningful feedback to students.
COMMENTS:
5 Superior
Print Form
5 Superior
5 Superior
5 Superior