University College | Roger Williams University
1
CREDENTIAL REVIEW PATHWAY
ENTRANCE/EXIT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT
This Assessment MUST be Completed and Submitted with the Application
Purpose: The Entrance/Exit Assessment Document is created for both the credential review candidate and Roger
Williams University- CU.
Directions for Candidate: Complete the document to present evidence demonstrating how you have met each
of the professional competencies contained in the RIPTS Standards. Credential Review Consortium members
expect applicants to demonstrate proficiency in both knowledge and demonstration of each competency. Keep in
mind that your assessment is based on the following question “Has the candidate demonstrated a sufficient level
of competency?”.
Directions for CRCI Reviewers: Mark “met” for a competency only if the applicant has demonstrated sufficient
evidence of knowledge of all parts of the competency at entrance.
Background Information (Candidate)
Applicant Name
Certification Area
Previous
Certifications
(Please include certification area, grade level, state license was issued, and expiration date)
Education
Institution
Degree (Bachelors, Masters,
PhD, Other)
Conferral Date
Major(s)
GPA
PK-12 Teaching
Experience
Name of District/School
District,
Private)
District/School
Contact
Information
Position Held and Grade
Level of Position
Dates of Employment
University College | Roger Williams University
2
Clinical Experience
(Practicum or
Student
Teaching/Internship)
Name of Ed Prep
Institution
Location of Practicum/Student
Teaching/Internship
Dates of
Practicum/Student
Teaching /Internship
Cert Area and Grade
Level
Previously
completed
Certification Exams*
Name of Exam
Date Completed
Score
*For more information on RI certification assessment, see:
http://www.ride.ri.gov/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Teachers-and-Administrators-Excellent-Educators/Educator-
Certification/Cert-main-page/Certification-Tests-September-1-2013.pd
TEACHER APPLICANTS: You will be completing TWO competency charts- the first focuses on PEDAGOGICAL competencies,
and the second focuses on CONTENT and would include evidence of your competency in your particular CTE area.
Teacher Applicants: Pedagogical Competencies
Please reference the Rhode Island Professional Teaching Standards and the National Board Professional
Teaching Standards-CTE to ensure that your rationale and evidence for the decision speak to the full complexity of
the standard encompassed within each sub-indicator. Your rationale for each piece of evidence needs to clearly
connect the artifact to the standard/s and sub-indicators. You will discuss WHY you selected the pieces of
evidence and HOW they indicate your competency in the standard/sub-indicator. Remember that each artifact
serves as one example of a time you met the sub-indicator, and that you need to include as much evidence as
possible to prove competency. Keep in mind that your assessment is based on the following question
Has the
candidate demonstrated a SUFFICIENT level of competency?”
Evidence that can be submitted for analysis includes:
Official transcripts of courses- credits will be accepted for courses from a regionally accredited
school with a “C” or above and/or a “Pass” within a Pass/Fail system. Foreign credential will also
be accepted and will follow current RIDE policies for foreign credentials
Ratings from supervised field experiences
Letters of Recommendation from Supervisors
Videos of instruction in the standards
Evaluations from school/district supervisors
Sample lesson plans/unit plans/curriculum documents
Sample plans for work-based learning projects that align with CTE content area
Pedagogical and/or content exams
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Sample data-driven instruction documents
Professional development plans/activities
Following the submission of the entrance assessment, RWU-UC will provide the Candidate with a differentiated
Plan of Study/demonstration outlining key learning opportunities that the Candidate must engage in to
complete all requirements for certification. The Plan of Study may include coursework as well as field
experiences designed to meet the individual needs of the Candidate as well as certification requirements.
University College | Roger Williams University
3
Exemplar of evidence source and rationale: Writing a strong and descriptive rationale for each evidence source you
include will illustrate to the reviewer the depth and breadth of your understanding of the standard and where you
are in meeting the competency. It is the responsibility of the Candidate to make the case that the evidence meets
the competency. Be sure to include evidence for the standards in the three clusters (Instruction, Environment and
Professionalism), and identify the individual standards and sub-indicators that align with each artifact. One piece of
evidence could include standards in more than one cluster. For example, when including a course as evidence,
examine the objectives on the syllabus to determine the RIPTS and NBPTS-CTE* standards that align with the
course.
Also, be extremely cognizant that your assessment is based on the following question “Has the candidate
demonstrated a SUFFICIENT level of competency?” Be sure to include enough evidence to demonstrate your level of
competency.
ENVIRONMENT CLUSTER
Standard
- RIPTS 4
Diversity of Learners
NBPTS
-CTE II- Responding to Diversity
Evidence- Lesson Plans
Rationale
-
Why I chose this evidence
: I have chosen these three lesson plans because they
demonstrate my understanding of responding to diversity of learners in my
Construction Technology
classroom. These lesson plans align with RIPTS Standard 4:
Teachers create instructional opportunities that reflect a respect for the diversity of
learners and an understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning.
Teachers. The particular sub
-indicators include: Design instruction that
accommodates individual differences in approaches to learning; Seek information
about the impact of student
s’ specific challenges to learning or disabilities on
classroom performance
. Make appropriate accommodations and modifications for
individual students who have identified learning differences or needs in an
Individualized Educational Plan (IEP), 504 Accomm
odation Plan, Personal Literacy
Plans (PLP’s), or other approved school-based individualized learning plans.
The lesson plans also connect to the NBPTS
-CTE II- IIResponding to Diversity: how
accomplished teachers respond to their own biases while promoti
ng instructional
inclusivity and a proactive stance toward individual respect, emotional safety, and
global citizenship in the CTE learning environment.
These lesson plans show that I
value and respect the diversity of my students’ learning needs.
How this evidence indicates meeting the
competency:
By revising and adapting these
lesson plans
, I have recognized that there are a multitude of strategies to utilize for
diverse learners to understand and participate more
successfully in my Construction
Technology
classroom. The common thread running through these artifacts is how
the lessons can be differentiated and adapted according to the learning needs of
each individual
student. As a teacher, it is imperative that I understand and
appre
ciate that every student learns differently. Adapting these lesson plans has
helped me comprehend more clearly how to break down lessons
in order to
accommodate each student as well as how to identify
more appropriate, effective
and engaging
instructional strategies that align with students’ individual capabilities
and interests
.
*NBPTS-CTE Standards are included to enhance and align with the RIPTS with CTE specific competencies.
Participation in the official NBPTS certification process is a major professional commitment. Interested educators
should visit the NBPTS website at www.nbpts.org to examine the Five Core Propositions, certification areas,
standards, and eligibility requirements.
University College | Roger Williams University
4
Entrance/Exit Assessment- Chart 1- Pedagogical Competencies
Please complete after reading the exemplar included above.
RIPTS
http://www.ride.ri.gov/port
als/0/uploads/documents/te
achers
-and-administrators-
ex
cellent-
educators/educator
-
certification/cert
-main-
page/ripts
-with-
preamble.pdf
http://www.nbpts.org/wp
-
content/uploads/EAYA
-
CTE.pdf
- pages 13-14
Evidence Sources
(examples: demonstration of proficiency, coursework,
verification of experience)
Entrance
Met/Not Met
Knowledge of
Competency
Exit
Met/Not Met
Knowledge of
Competency
Exit
Met/Not Met
Demonstration
of Competency
INSTRUCTION
CLUSTER
Element 1: Content
Knowledge
RIPTS 1
- General
Knowledge
RIPTS 2
- Content
Knowledge
NBPTS
-CTE III-
Knowledge of Content
Element 2:
Instructional Practice
and Program Design
RIPTS 5
- Critical
Thinking
RIPTS 8
-
Communication.
RIPTS 9
- Assessment
NBPTS
-CTE IV- Learning
Environ.
NBPTS
-CTE V-
Assessment
NBPTS
-CTE VII-
Program
Design and
Management
University College | Roger Williams University
5
ENVIRONMENT
CLUSTER
Element 3:
The
Learning Process
RIPTS 3
- Learning and
Development
Element 4: Knowing
Students
RIPTS 4
Diversity of
Learners
NBPTS
-CTE I-
Knowledge of Students
NBPTS
-CTE II-
Responding to Diversity
Element 5: Positive and
Productive Learning
Environments
RIPTS
6
- Learning
Environment NBTPS
-
CTE IV
- Learning
Environments and
Ins
truction. Practices
Professionalism Cluster
Element 6: Post
-
Secondary Readiness
NBPTS
-CTE VI- Post-
Secondary Readiness
Element 7: Reflective
Practice
Element
7: Reflective Practice
RIPTS 10
- Professional
Development
NBPTS-
CTE X
- Reflective
Practice
Element 8:
Collaboration
RIPTS 7
-
Collaboration
NBPTS
-CTE VIII-
Partnerships and
Collaborations
Element 9: Professional
Development
RIPTS 11
- Professional
and Ethical Standards
NBPTS
- CTE IX-
Leadership in Prof.
University College | Roger Williams University
6
Entrance/Exit Assessment- Chart 2- Content Competencies
Teacher Applicant: Content Competencies - Reference the appropriate content standards associated with the
requested CTE certificate area to ensure that your rationale and evidence for decision speak to the full complexity
of the standard encompassed within each sub-indicator. For more information on the appropriate content
standards for each CTE certificate area, see the table in the RI Credential Review Pathway: Consortium Protocol at
http://www.ride.ri.gov/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Teachers-and-Administrators-Excellent-
Educators/Educator-Certification/Becoming-an-Educator/CRCI_Pathway_Protocol.pdf
If no content standards are available for your CTE area, evidence can include coursework in the content area,
licenses, verification of work experience, certificates, national assessment results, recognitions in the CTE field,
training opportunities, membership in professional organizations, etc. Keep in mind that your assessment is based
on the following question “
Has the candidate demonstrated a sufficient level of competency?”
Evidence Sources
(Examples: demonstration of proficiency, coursework, verification
of experience, assessment results, licenses and/or certifications)
Entrance
Met/Not Met
Knowledge of
Competency
Exit
Met/Not Met
Knowledge of
Competency
Exit
Met/Not Met
Demonstratio
n of
Competency
Major or equivalent
(Middle, Secondar
y or All
Grades teachers); CTE
content competencies
University College | Roger Williams University
7
PLAN OF STUDY: After reviewing your evidence, it has been determined that in order to meet competencies
noted as “does not meet, you need to complete the following. Please note that the RWU-UC Plan of Study
is competency-based and not limited to specific courses. Also, be sure to note all assessments, licenses,
degrees and/or years of experience required for your CTE certification. This information can be found at:
http://www.ride.ri.gov/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Teachers-and-Administrators-Excellent-
Educators/Educator-Certification/Cert-Requirements/RI_SecondaryGrades_CTE_Requirements.pdf
Credential Review Completion Authorization (CRCI Reviewer)
The following individual has met all requirements for their Credential Review Program of Study, and, as
such, I am recommending him/her for certification in the specified certification area.
Name
Certification Area
Approved Credential Review Program
Name of Dean/Director
Telephone/Email of Dean/Director
Signature and Date*
________/_________/_______
_
*Signature verifies that the applicant recommended for certification has satisfactorily completed the credential review
program of study, has the qualities of character for teaching/leading, has met all certification requirements particular to the
certificate area, and is competent in the area for which certification is sought.