Biodiversity
Supplementary
Planning Document
For Northamptonshire
August 2015
Stanwick Lakes. Photo by Sarah Gadd
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
ii
Statutory status of the Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document
This Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) has been prepared under the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase
Act (the “2004 Act”). The Biodiversity SPD is a statutory Local Development Document (LDD). It will cover the whole
of Northamptonshire, but will be adopted by each Local Planning Authority as a statutory SPD.
The Biodiversity SPD was prepared in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England)
Regulaons 2012 (Statutory Instrument 2012 No. 767) (the “2012 Regulaons”), which set out the minimum
requirements for the preparaon of an SPD. It is essenal for these requirements to be met in order for this
document to be classied as a statutory LDD, thereby supplemenng statutory Local Plans.
This SPD will supplement policies within the North Northamptonshire Core Spaal Strategy, adopted June 2008 and
West Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy Local Plan (Part 1), adopted December 2014. It is also consistent with the
dra North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031. The specic preparaon process for the Biodiversity
SPD is directed by 2012 Regulaons 12-14 and 35. The process also needs to have regard to the relevant Statements
of Community Involvement (SCI).
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
iii
Contents
1. Introducon 1
2. Denions 1
3. Legislaonandpolicybase:keymessages 2
4. Astepbystepguidetobuildingnatureintodevelopment 3
5. Preparingandsubmingplanningapplicaons 4
StageA:Preparingtosubmitaplanningapplicaon 4
StageA1:Inialimpressionssurvey/BiodiversityChecklist 4
StageA2:NatureConservaonSurvey 5
StageA3:Avoidanceandmigaon 6
StageA4:Compensaon 7
StageA5:Enhancement:delivering‘netgain’inbiodiversity 8
StageB:SubmingaPlanningApplicaon 10
StageC:PlanningPermissionGranted:theConstruconPhase 11
StageD:Aercare 12
Glossary 13
Appendix1 BiodiversityChecklist 15
Appendix2 Ecologicalsurveycalendar 20
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
1
1. Introducon
Biodiversity is a key aspect of sustainable development. Every local authority has a statutory duty to have regard, so
far as is consistent with the proper exercise of its funcons, to the purpose of conserving biodiversity.
1
This duty is
addressed in part by including nature conservaon policies in Northamptonshire’s core strategies and saved policies
in the old Local Plan or Local Plan Part 2 for each borough/district.
Applicaon
This Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) is designed to be used by those considering and applying for planning
permission in Northamptonshire. It may also be a useful reference for those developing planning policy and making
site allocaons.
Aims
This SPD explains how biodiversity shall be integrated into the development process to ensure that legislaon and
policy requirements are met and best pracce standards are achieved. It oers a standardised approach which all
applicants should follow. The SPD expands on the main principles set out in the Naonal Planning Policy Framework
and relevant local planning policies, and should be used together with expert ecological assessment of the details of
each specic case.
2. Denions
Biodiversity (a contracon of ‘biological diversity’) refers to the number, variety and variability of living organisms.
It is oen dened in terms of genes, species and ecosystems. Biodiversity is widely considered to be a measure of
ecosystem quality or health: greater biodiversity indicates beer health.
Biodiversity features include:
Species and their habitats (including feeding, resng and breeding areas): note this may include features
like trees and buildings that could hold protected species (e.g. owls, bats)
Statutory andnon-statutory nature conservaon sites
UK and Local Biodiversity Acon Plan habitats and species
Habitats and Species of Principal Importance for England (under secon 41 of the Natural Environment and
Rural Communies Act 2006)
Features which provide links/corridors or stepping stones from one habitat to another.
Biodiversity impacts include but are not limited to:
Loss of, or damage to, all or part of an
important site for biodiversity
Habitat fragmentaon, isolaon and removal
or severance of wildlife corridors (Figure 1)
Introducon or spread of invasive non-nave
species
Soil, air or water contaminaon
Disturbance and/or displacement, e.g. from
recreaonal acvity
Predaon and/or harassment by domesc pets
Light polluon
Reducon/loss of species resources (e.g. food,
water, shelter)
Interrupon to an established management
regime, habitat neglect
1 Natural Environment and Rural Communies Act (2006) Secon 40.
Figure1Habitatcorridors(A)allowspeciestomove
throughthelandscape.Wherecorridorsaresevered(B)
speciesareconnedtosmallpatchesofhabitat,leading
toincreasedlocalexncon.
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
2
Biodiversity impacts can be:
Permanent or temporary
Direct or indirect
Short-term or long-term
Cumulave (i.e. signicant when the impacts of mulple small developments are taken into account)
Natural England should be consulted as early as possible where a development could impact a European site
2
or Site of Special Scienc Interest. Where a European Protected Species could be aected, applicants should
consult as early as possible Natural England’s standing advice on protected species.
3
If one or more European
Protected Species are likely to be aected then Natural England’s licensing process must be followed.
Certain types of development must be assessed in more detail through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
4
and where required Habitats Regulaons Assessment (HRA)
5
procedures. Please refer to relevant guidance
6
for
more informaon on these requirements.
3. Legislaonandpolicybase:keymessages
Biodiversity conservaon planning policy is supported by a naonal and internaonal legal and policy base (Annex 2).
Key messages for development include:
Local planning authories have a statutory duty to have regard to conserving biodiversity as part of the
planning process.
Local planning authories are expected to ensure their planning decisions are based on up-to-date
informaon.
Biodiversity features of value frequently occur outside designated sites and these should be conserved,
enhanced and addional features created as part of development.
Maintaining current levels of biodiversity is not sucient. Development should provide a net gain in
biodiversity where possible, guided in part by the Local Biodiversity Acon Plan.
Northamptonshire supports a range of sites, habitats and species of naonal and internaonal importance
(a list of habitats and species can be found in Annex 1). Local authories have a parcular responsibility to
promote their maintenance and long term conservaon as part of the planning process.
2 In Northamptonshire, the Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits Special Protecon Area (SPA)
3 Available at GOV.UK. 2014. Planning and development guidance – Protected species and sites: how to review planning
proposals [ONLINE]. hps://www.gov.uk/protected-species-and-sites-how-to-review-planning-proposals. Accessed 20 November
2014.
4 EIA Direcve (85/33/EEC as amended by 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC)
5 Habitats Direcve (92/43/EEC), which concerns development proposals that may directly or indirectly aect the
designated interest of European protected sites.
6 Re EIA, Planning Pracce Guidance explains the requirements of the Town and Country Planning (EIA) Regulaons 2011.
Please see hp://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/environmental-impact-assessment/. HRA guidance is
available from the European Commission (European Commission. 2002. Assessment of plans and projects signicantly aecng
Natura 2000 sites. Luxembourg: Oce for Ocial Publicaons of the European Communies. Available at hp://ec.europa.eu/
environment/nature/natura2000/management/docs/art6/natura_2000_assess_en.pdf.) Accessed 21 October 2014.
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Treeplanng
The award-winning Accordia development
in Cambridge uses a range of arboricultural
techniques to incorporate 700 mature trees plus
supplemental planng. The scheme provides
three mes the open and wooded green spaces
compared to other developments locally. Photo
by John Lord
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
3
4. Astepbystepguidetobuildingnatureintodevelopment
A1: Initial impressions survey/Biodiversity Checklist
Complete the Biodiversity Checklist in Appendix 1.
Although the advice of an ecologist should be sought where feasible, the checklist can be
completed by applicants, planning ofcers and the public.
Are existing biodiversity features likely to be
affected by the development?
A2: Nature conservation survey
Must be carried out by an appropriately qualied ecologist. Take account of any
biodiversity features within and near the development site.
A3: Avoidance and mitigation
Outline measures to avoid harm to the features identied in A1 and A2 and mitigate
unavoidable impacts.
A4: Compensation
Seek expert ecological advice on and describe appropriate compensation measures in
order to ensure no net loss of biodiversity.
Compensation must be justied, appropriate, and guaranteed to be deliverable.
A5: Enhancement
All development should where possible deliver a net gain in biodiversity.
B: Submitting a planning application
Ensure the application includes the necessary documentation:
Biodiversity Checklist
Ecological/survey reports
Ecological Management Plan (if required)
C: Planning permission granted — construction phase
Ensure good practice is followed during construction.
D: Aftercare
Ensure adequate provision is made for ongoing biodiversity management.
Yes
No
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
4
5. Preparingandsubmingplanningapplicaons
StageA:Preparingtosubmitaplanningapplicaon
Biodiversity impacts are most easily avoided when idened
in the earliest stages of development. Recognising biodiversity
features early on also oers the best chance of incorporang
them into the development design. It is essenal that
applicants ensure they have all necessary ecological and
planning policy informaon. Doing this at the outset reduces
the risk of delays or objecons caused by lack of informaon.
Most ecological surveys can only be carried out at specic mes
of year so it is important that this be built into the development
schedule (refer to Survey Calendar in Appendix 2).
It is equally important to make sure there is not a long gap
between conducng surveys and subming the applicaon.
Some ecological data may become out of date aer only a
couple of years. Applicants are advised to ensure that all
supporng informaon is current and ready to be submied
as a single package.
Collecng ecological informaon is a two step process:
1. Biodiversity Checklist: complete this form to idenfy features in and around the applicaon site which may
be of biodiversity value.
2. Ecological survey: if the Biodiversity Checklist idenes features of potenal value, a more thorough
assessment of those features should be carried out.
It is commonly thought that habitat and species surveys can be postponed unl aer determinaon and then
addressed by condion. Part IV of ODPM Circular 06/2005 makes it clear that this pracce is not acceptable in
almost all cases. This is supported by legal precedent.
7
If surveys are carried out aer planning permission has been
granted and they reveal major impacts on wildlife, there is no reasonable way for the local planning authority to
exercise addional control, amend the applicaon or revoke permission.
StageA1:Inialimpressionssurvey/BiodiversityChecklist
The Biodiversity Checklist (Appendix 1) is a simple survey that should be used to detect features that could be at risk
and idenfy any surveys required. The Biodiversity Checklist can be completed by the applicant, although ecological
advice at this stage is advised.
Checklist answers must be transferred to the ‘1APP’ planning applicaon form (Queson 13: Biodiversity and
Geological Conservaon). If the answer is yes to any part of 1APP Queson 13, the relevant ecological surveys must
be provided with the applicaon for the biodiversity impact to be assessed.
Where the Biodiversity Checklist (Appendix 1) detects that an applicaon could aect the Upper Nene Valley
Gravel Pits SPA, applicants should consult the Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits SPA Supplementary Planning
Document.
The Biodiversity Checklist has been designed to detect the majority of biodiversity features which could be aected
by development. It is important to note however that protected species can occur in very unlikely places.
Aempts to exclude or remove biodiversity features could constute a criminal oence and should not be
undertaken.
7 R (on the applicaon of Simon Woolley) v Cheshire East Borough Council. 2009. The judgment claries for the rst me
the legal duty of a Local Planning Authority when determining a planning applicaon for a development which may have an
impact on European Protected Species.
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Swibricks/boxes
A young swi looks out of a Schwegler panel
installed over a cavity in a new house in
Fulbourn, Cambridge. Photo courtesy Acon
for Swis
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
5
StageA2:NatureConservaonSurvey
SurveyMethodology
Surveys should take account of all the possible biodiversity features idened by the Biodiversity Checklist and any
others which may later become apparent. Standard survey methods should be used: a list of these is available at
hp://www.cieem.net/sources-of-survey-methods-sosm-
8
. Where protected species surveys are required, applicants
should refer to government planning advice
9
, available at hps://www.gov.uk/construcon-near-protected-areas-
and-wildlife.
Most species surveys can only be conducted at certain mes of year. If it is necessary to vary the method used from
accepted survey methods the reason should be explained clearly (and ideally agreed with relevant experts before
subming the applicaon), as should the eect on the reliability of the results. Opmal habitat and species survey
mes are presented in the Ecological Survey Calendar in Appendix 2.
All ecological surveys should also include an ‘extended Phase I Habitat Survey’ to assess the plant communies and
habitat types present on site. Areas idened as being of botanical interest should be re-surveyed in detail to conrm
their extent and conservaon value.
Consultants should take account of historical species records for the site. These are available from the
Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) hp://www.northantsbrc.org.uk, and for certain species
(e.g. bats) from county specialists. These data, along with inial survey work, may idenfy further survey needs
that were not apparent from the Biodiversity Checklist (e.g. past use of the site by protected species). As long as
there is a reasonable likelihood of a species being present and aected by the development specic surveys must be
conducted to conrm its presence or likely absence.
Some species records are also available from the Naonal Biodiversity Network Gateway (NBN) hps://data.nbn.org.
uk/. Please note that NBN data are supplementary to, and not a substute for, locally derived NBRC records. Reliance
solely on NBN data is not acceptable and may constute a violaon of NBN Terms and Condions.
Biodiversity features near the site need to be assessed as well as those on the site. ‘Near’ will vary in its meaning
depending on the development’s zone of inuence and the relave sensivity of species and habitats in the
surrounding landscape.
Applicants of major and/or complex proposals, or proposals in ecologically sensive areas, are encouraged to
consult with relevant nature conservaon organisaons about the proposal and the scope of ecological surveys to be
undertaken. A list of contacts and organisaons is provided in Annex 3 to this SPD.
The methods, results and conclusions of any survey must be compiled and submied in wring as part of the
planning applicaon.
8 Chartered Instute of Ecology and Environmental Management. 2014. Sources of Survey Methods (SoSM) [ONLINE].
Available at hp://www.cieem.net/sources-of-survey-methods-sosm-. Accessed 24 March 2014.
9 GOV.UK. 2014. Planning and development – guidance: Construcon near protected areas and wildlife [ONLINE].
Available at hps://www.gov.uk/construcon-near-protected-areas-and-wildlife. Accessed 21 October 2014.
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Arableplants
Important Arable Plant species were found on a
development site in Keering. Arable plants can
lie dormant in the soil for years unl condions
are right. The developer is storing the soil
and will use it to create allotments, which will
provide a good disturbance regime for these
rare plants. Photo by Dean Morley
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
6
ChoosingConsultants
Ecological surveys should be undertaken by competent persons and following appropriate survey methods. The
Chartered Instute of Ecology and Environmental Management CIEEM maintains a list of members who oer
commercial consultancy services. The Environmental Consultants Directory website oers a similar search.
Before appoinng an ecological consultant, it would be prudent to make enquiries about their abilies and
experience. Prospecve clients may wish to ask about the following:
Membership of an appropriate professional body. Individuals employed by any consultancy should be
eligible for membership of the Chartered Instute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM).
The use of CIEEM members is strongly advised.
Possession of relevant wildlife licence(s) (where applicable). Some protected species can only be handled
or trapped by personnel holding specic government licences.
Previous experience. Consultants should be asked for examples of recent work and a list of references so
you can verify the standard of work and value for money.
Knowledge of the local area. Ecologists with local knowledge may be beer able to assess the implicaons
of a scheme within the local context.
Costs. These vary widely so you may wish to seek more than one quotaon. As with any sort of
professional service, it is helpful to be as clear as possible about what is required and what will be
included in the quoted price.
StageA3:Avoidanceandmigaon
Ecological survey ndings should be carefully considered from the earliest design stage of a development. The overall
objecves should be to avoid harm, migate potenally negave impacts and integrate exisng biodiversity into the
scheme. This involves following the ‘migaon hierarchy’ (Figure 2).
Figure2 Migaonhierarchyforaddressingimpactsonbiodiversityfeatures
Steps must rst be taken to avoid any likely signicant impacts to biodiversity, for example by:
Designing the site in such a way as to retain any important biodiversity features
Scheduling works when key species are not acve or breeding.
Avoidance is oen the cheapest and most eecve way of reducing potenal impacts but it requires biodiversity to be
considered at the very earliest stages of planning.
Unavoidable impacts should be migated. Migaon means taking steps on the site itself to minimise the duraon,
intensity and/or extent of impacts that cannot be avoided enrely. This might include:
Adapng construcon methods to reduce polluon
Altering site plans to minimise disturbance to sensive species or habitats.
Eecve migaon can eliminate some negave impacts. Migaon should not be confused with compensaon,
which is covered in the next secon.
Avoid
Mitigate
Compensate
Avoid negative impacts on biodiversity
Minimise/mitigate unavoidable impacts
As a last resort, compensate for residual impacts
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
7
StageA4:Compensaon
All on-site migaon opons should be exhausted before compensaon is even considered.
10
Compensaon
schemes are rarely successful in replacing what has been lost,
11
and it is far beer not to cause damage in the rst
place than to try to compensate for it later. Unlike migaon, compensaon is usually carried out o-site and oen
involves major habitat restoraon or creaon to make up for what is being lost to development.
Compensaon measures should adhere to the following principles:
Successful recreaon or translocaon of the biodiversity feature should be reasonably certain.
Wherever possible, compensaon habitats should be created to a suitable quality before damage takes
place, allowing species to colonise it from the area to be lost. Some features (e.g. hedgerows, ponds,
badger ses) need me to mature and funcon ecologically before they will oer eecve alternave
habitat.
Compensaon will oen require delivering much more habitat than what has been lost, to account for
failure risk, climate change eects or other factors.
Measures should be in place to secure the ongoing management of the compensaon.
Biodiversity is extremely complex: even with full knowledge it would not be easy to quanfy. It is therefore beyond
the scope of this SPD to dene how to calculate required compensaon. Instead, each situaon must be treated
individually and expert ecological advice should be sought. Compensaon will be acceptable only where independent
expert advice indicates that there will be a high probability of success.
In accordance with the UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy (2005), environmental costs should fall on
those who impose them (the ‘polluter pays’ principle).
12
“If signicant harm [to biodiversity] cannot be avoided, adequately migated, or, as a last resort, compensated
for, then planning permission should be refused.
13
10 The Parliamentary Oce of Science and Technology. 2011. POSTNOTE Number 369: Biodiversity Oseng [ONLINE].
Available at hp://researchbriengs.parliament.uk/ResearchBrieng/Summary/POST-PN-369. Accessed 6 August 2015.
11 South West Ecological Surveys, Leve-Therivel Sustainability Consultants and Oxford Brookes University. 2004. Strategic
Environmental Assessment and Biodiversity: Guidance for Praconers. Report to Countryside Council for Wales, English Nature,
Environment Agency and Royal Society for the Protecon of Birds [ONLINE}. Available at hps://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/SEA_
and_biodiversity_tcm9-133070.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2015.
12 HM Government. 2005. Securing the future: delivering UK sustainable development strategy. London: TSO, p. 16.
13 Communies and Local Government. 2012. Naonal Planning Policy Framework, paragraph 118.
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Livingroofs
Sheeld’s West One is a mixed use development with
three green roofs. Its 450 apartments proved to be so
desirable that 95% were sold prior to compleon. The
development now features in Sheeld Universitys
tour of green roofs. Photo by Qi-Guang Chew
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Treeplanng
As part of a local regeneraon project 1800 new trees
were planted at Riverside Park Industrial Estate in
Middlesbrough. Occupancy rates subsequently rose
from 40 – 78%. Photo by Stacey Dougal
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
8
StageA5:Enhancement:delivering‘netgain’inbiodiversity
Even in cases where migaon or compensaon is deemed unnecessary, planning policy requires new development
to provide a net gain in biodiversity where possible
14
. This should be appropriate to the scale, type and locaon of
the development.
Biodiversity enhancements should adhere to the following principles:
Management plans and long-term funding must both be in
place to ensure enhancements are sustainable and result in a
lasng benet to biodiversity.
Enhancements should add to exisng habitat networks/
wildlife corridors where they exist (see Figure 1). This is
parcularly important on sites within or adjacent to the
Nene Valley Nature Improvement Area (NIA) (Figure 3),
where developments of a scale to contribute a signicant,
quanable benet, or conversely undermine the delivery of
NIA objecves will be expected to enhance and improve the
ecological network of the NIA.
Public open space should include natural and semi-natural
habitats. Larger spaces are logiscally easier and more cost
eecve to manage than smaller ones. They also make a
greater wildlife and amenity contribuon. In areas with
several conguous development sites applicants should
consider working together to create larger and more eecve
habitat areas.
Enhancements should seek to contribute to Biodiversity
Acon Plan objecves.
15
Enhancements which also provide ood aenuaon or
sustainable drainage, improve ecosystem services or deliver other benets will be welcomed.
Opportunies should be taken to incorporate biodiversity into the fabric of buildings, for example:
Living roofs and/or living walls. These promote urban biodiversity while reducing storm water runo
and providing building insulaon, reducing cooling costs in summer (not appropriate for Listed
Buildings or most tradional buildings).
Swi and swallow bricks, which are mortared directly into brick walls
Bat access les for roofs, bat bricks, bat cavies for walls.
16
Where possible and praccal, nave species should be used in the landscaping scheme. Nave species
should be appropriate to the local environment and to the extent possible sourced from local seed. The
Flora Locale website www.oralocale.org has a directory of suppliers of locally sourced seed and plants.
Ornamental planngs should include a substanal proporon of species and variees which support
bumblebees, bueries and other pollinators. Landscaping schemes should include plants which ower at
dierent mes throughout the year. The RHS ‘Perfect for Pollinators’ lists
17
are an excellent starng point for
creang pollinator-friendly landscaping.
Tree species should be considered within both the exisng ecological context and predicted climate change
condions. The Forest Research website (www.forestresearch.gov.uk) oers advice on choosing trees for
climate change resilience.
14 Communies and Local Government. 2012. Naonal Planning Policy Framework, paragraph 109.
15 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Partnership. 2008. Northamptonshire Biodiversity Acon Plan hp://www.
northamptonshirebiodiversity.org.
16 More ideas can be found in: Murphy B, Gunnell K and Williams C. 2013. Designing for Biodiversity: A Technical Guide for
New and Exisng Buildings, 2nd edion. London: RIBA Publishing, 176 p.
17 The Royal Horcultural Society. 2014. Plants for Pollinators [ONLINE]. hp://www.rhs.org.uk/science/conservaon-
biodiversity/wildlife/encourage-wildlife-to-your-garden/plants-for-pollinators. Accessed 16 May 2014.
Many plant species which are nave
to the UK are not in fact found in
Northamptonshire, and some species
are only found in certain parts
of the county. Seed and planng
mixes should be appropriate to the
locaon. Informaon on species
distribuon can be found in The Flora
of Northamptonshire and the Soke
of Peterborough, available at some
libraries.
Water avens Geum rivale is found in most
commercial wetland seed mixes but is not nave
to Northamptonshire. Photo by Axel Krisnsson
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
9
Figure 3 Nene Valley Nature Improvement Area (NIA). The Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits SPA is shown in
orange.
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
10
StageB:SubmingaPlanningApplicaon
By the me a planning applicaon is ready for submission, the Biodiversity Checklist should have been completed
and depending on the outcome, all relevant ecological surveys should have been completed. The process described
in stages A3 to A5 of this SPD should also have been documented. Planning applicaons should include:
Survey reports for any biodiversity features idened as at risk in the Biodiversity Checklist. If there are
none, a statement should be included explaining why and acknowledging that the applicant is aware that it
is a criminal oence to disturb or harm protected species should they subsequently be found or disturbed.
A statement explaining the steps planned to address the conservaon of any exisng biodiversity features,
so far as possible
Appropriate proposals for biodiversity enhancement
Ecological Management Plan (EMP) if required (see Stage D below).
Detailed validaon requirements need to be checked with each authority as they can dier. If it is idened that the
applicaon will aect features clearly specied in the validaon requirements (e.g. a designated site or a feature
likely to contain protected species), then in the absence of relevant biodiversity informaon the planning authority
may judge the applicaon to be invalid.
18
Ecologicalreports
Ecological survey reports should:
Describe how stages A1 and A2 have been achieved
Locate and describe exisng biodiversity features and their signicance, with scale plans where appropriate
Describe how stages A3, A4, A5, C and D would be achieved
Provide contact details, qualicaons and experience of all relevant personnel.
Following good pracce as set out in this SPD will avoid unnecessary delay during the determinaon process.
Applicants are advised to also consider other SPDs which may be in place in the local authority.
18 Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure)(England)Order 2010 SI 2010 No 2184 Arcle 10(5)
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
SustainableDrainageSystems(SuDS)
Property values in Elvetham Heath, Fleet tend
to posively reect their proximity to the
developments SuDS basins and ponds. Public
consultaon has revealed a high regard for this
scheme, which incorporates a range of nave
plant species. Photo courtesy Susdrain
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Wildowerplanng
In London’s Clapton Park Estate low
maintenance ower beds have been created
along fences, around trees and in empty lawns,
creang a vibrant and colourful estate. This
successful project had its own garden at the
2007 Chelsea Flower Show, winning a silver gilt
medal. Photo courtesy David White Design
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
11
StageC:PlanningPermissionGranted:theConstruconPhase
As a project progresses to the construcon phase the migaon strategies outlined in the environmental statement
(or other ecological reports) must be put into pracce. A Construcon Environmental Management Plan (CEMP)
is best pracce and helps manage the environmental eects of construcon.
19
A CEMP includes a risk assessment
idenfying all aspects of construcon that could have an environmental impact and outlines management measures
designed to eliminate and/or minimise the idened impacts.
Where the ecological impacts of a development are signicant or the development site is large and includes a
range of ecological features, an Ecological Clerk of Works (ECoW) should be employed. The ECoW’s role is to guide
and advise on how to avoid or minimise ecological impacts during site preparaon and construcon.
20
An ECoW
will oversee the construcon period and advise on the resoluon of ecological issues as they arise, to protect the
on-site features, habitats and species. An ECoW will ensure that all landscaping and ecological works, including
habitat creaon projects and migaon for protected species, are undertaken in accordance with the Ecological
Management Plan (see below) and the various method statements agreed with the Local Planning Authority.
The decommissioning or demolion of some structures may also require employment of an ECoW, where the
potenal impacts on biodiversity features may be signicant.
19 [BSI] Brish Standards Instuon. 2013. BS42020:2013 Biodiversity — Code of pracce for planning and development.
Secon 10.2 Construcon environmental management plan (CEMP). London: BSI.
20 The Associaon of Environmental & Ecological Clerks of Works. 2011. About AEECoW: Role of an Env/ECoW? [ONLINE].
hp://www.aeecow.com/role-of-an-aeecow.html. Accessed 30 July 2015.
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Wildlifetunnels
Wildlife tunnels like this one built under the
A47 Earl Shilton Bypass in Leicestershire
reduce roadkill incidents by helping badgers,
newts and other animals cross the road safely.
Fencing installed along the road helps guide
animals toward the tunnel. Photo courtesy
Leicestershire County Council
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
SustainableDrainageSystems(SuDS)
Small SuDS can provide property-scale
biodiversity benets. This retrot project
aenuates roof water from a social housing
block in Islington, allowing one of the roof
downpipes to be disconnected and reducing
peak ow from the site. Photo courtesy
Susdrain
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
12
StageD:Aercare
Habitats retained or created through development should be maintained in perpetuity. ‘In perpetuity’ means
for the life of the development, or in legal terms 99 years.
21
Temporary developments may require shorter-term
management.
Where a signicant amount of habitat is to be retained, restored or created the local planning authority may use
a planning condion to require the producon of an Ecological Management Plan (EMP)
22
. The EMP idenes the
biodiversity features which will be managed to maintain and enhance the site’s nature conservaon value. It sets out
objecves for these habitats, with detailed management specicaons and a monitoring programme of ten years or
more. The EMP must be fully costed and specify how the management and monitoring will be funded.
Applicants who envisage a non-governmental or public sector organisaon taking on a role in long term management
should contact the appropriate organisaons as early as possible, and certainly well before subming a planning
applicaon.
21 The Environment Bank Ltd (2013). Frequently asked quesons: biodiversity oseng [ONLINE] hp://www.environ-
mentbank.com/docs/FAQs_Oseng.pdf Accessed 19 September 2014.
22 Brish Standards Instuon. 2013. BS42020:2013 Biodiversity — Code of pracce for planning and development.
Secon 9.2.3 Condioning biodiversity/ecological strategies, plans and schemes. London: BSI.
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Swibricks/boxes
An external swi box and integral swi bricks
(air brick liners) retroed into the gable end of
a house in Worlington, Suolk. The external box
was occupied within two months of installaon.
Photo courtesy Acon for Swis
Biodiversityindevelopmentphotocasestudy:
Livingroofs
Living roofs needn’t be large: this one was
installed on a Sheeld Botanical Gardens
gazebo aeconately known as ‘the onion’.
Photo by Andrea Micheloni
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
13
Glossary
Biodiversity: (a contracon of ‘biological diversity’) refers to the number, variety and variability of living organisms.
It is oen dened in terms of genes, species and ecosystems. Biodiversity is widely considered to be a measure of
ecosystem quality or health: greater biodiversity indicates beer health.
Compensaon:measures such as habitat creaon, taken o-site, which oset the residual ecological impacts aer
avoidance and migaon have been undertaken. Compensaon is a last resort and should only be considered where
there are residual biodiversity impacts which cannot be migated. Strict tests must be met before compensaon is
considered.
ConstruconEnvironmentalManagementPlan(CEMP): a document that details the principles, pracces and
procedures for monitoring and managing the environmental eects of a project in the run up to and during the
construcon phase.
Designatedsites: a collecve term for the suite of statutory and non-statutory nature conservaon sites (see below)
EcologicalClerkofWorks(ECoW): an environmental or construcon professional with direct responsibility for
monitoring compliance with environmental legislaon, policy or migaon. An ECoW may be engaged during the
construcon or operaon phase of any development where environmental compliance requires monitoring or
auding. An ECoW will usually be an appropriately qualied professional such as an environmental consultant, civil
engineer, surveyor, project manager or ecologist.
EcologicalManagementPlan(EMP): a site-specic document that includes the processes and instrucons to
manage a site and its operaons in such a way as to protect and enhance the biodiversity and ecology of the site and
surrounding area. The scope and content of an EMP will depend on the scale and type of project or development for
which it is to be used.
Ecosystemservices: the benets which the natural environment provides to humans. These are generally classied
as 1) supporng services (e.g. soil formaon, photosynthesis), 2) provisioning services (e.g. food, bre, fresh
water), 3) regulang services (e.g. pollinaon, water puricaon) and 4) cultural services (e.g. recreaon, spiritual
enrichment).
Enhancement: adding to the pre-exisng ecological value of a site for its connued benet for wildlife. Enhancement
measures are addional to any avoidance, migaon or compensaon. Biodiversity enhancement is required where
possible per paragraph 109 of the Naonal Planning Policy Framework.
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment(EIA): a process of evaluang the likely environmental impacts of a proposed
project or development, taking into account interrelated socio-economic, cultural and human health impacts,
both benecial and adverse. In EU member states the EIA process is governed by the EIA Direcve (85/337/ECC) as
amended.
EuropeanProtectedSpecies: species of plants and animals – not including birds – listed in annexes II and IV of the
EU Habitats Direcve and protected by law throughout the European Union. Bird species receive separate protecon
under the Birds Direcve.
Europeansite: one of two types of European statutory nature conservaon designaons. Special Protecon Areas
(SPA) are classied under Council Direcve 2009/147/EC on the conservaon of wild birds (this is the codied version
of Council Direcve 79/409/EEC as amended). This is generally known as the Birds Direcve and protects rare,
threatened or vulnerable birds listed in Annex I of the Direcve. Special Areas of Conservaon (SAC) are classied
under Council Direcve 92/43/EEC on the Conservaon of natural habitats and of wild fauna and ora (known as
the Habitats Direcve) which protects habitats (annex I) and species (annex II) of the Direcve. The enre suite of
European sites is known as the Natura 2000 Network. Northamptonshire’s only European site is the Upper Nene
Valley Gravel Pits SPA.
Habitatconnecvity: the degree to which the landscape facilitates or impedes species movement between patches
of habitat. Connecvity inuences local gene ow, adaptaon, colonisaon and exncon, aecng in parcular the
ability of organisms to move through the landscape in response to climate change.
Habitatfragmentaon: the process by which habitat loss results in the division of larger, connuous habitats into
smaller, more isolated remnants. Fragmentaon disrupts ecological processes, isolates species populaons and leads
to reduced species richness (i.e. reduced biodiversity).
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
14
HabitatsRegulaonsAssessment(HRA): required under Council Direcve 92/43/EEC on the Conservaon of natural
habitats and of wild fauna and ora (The Habitats Direcve), the process of determining likely signicant eects and
(where appropriate) assessing adverse impacts on the integrity of a European site.
Invasivenon-navespecies: any non-nave animal or plant that has the ability to spread causing damage to the
environment, the economy, our health and the way we live
LocalBiodiversityAconPlan(LBAP): a framework for habitat and species conservaon at the local — in most cases
county — level. LBAPs highlight species and habitats that are of parcular value locally and naonally, and outline
measures for their conservaon. They are usually guided by an LBAP partnership of local authories, statutory
agencies and conservaon organisaons.
Migaon: measures that aim to reduce and/or minimise the risk of an impact on wildlife, for example changes to
ming, engineering design or technique. Depending on the kind of impact and the locaon of the development,
migaon may be necessary outside the site boundary.
NeneValleyNatureImprovementArea(NIA): one of the original 12 ecological networks recognised in the Naonal
Planning Policy Framework and established to reconnect wildlife habitats and help species respond to the challenges
of climate change. The Nene Valley NIA extends from Daventry to Peterborough and includes the River Nene and its
main tributaries.
Non-statutorynatureconservaonsite: an area of land designated for its nature conservaon value but which
does not receive statutory protecon. Some non-statutory sites may however receive a degree of protecon under
naonal or local policy. In Northamptonshire these sites include Local Wildlife Sites (LWS), Local Geological Sites
(LGS), Potenal Wildlife Sites (PWS) and Protected Wildower Verges (PWV).
NorthamptonshireBiodiversityRecordsCentre(NBRC): the biological and geological informaon centre for
Northamptonshire County. The NBRC operates as a non-prot organisaon providing access to informaon about
species, designated wildlife sites and geological sites. Data held at the NBRC come from a number of sources
including local voluntary recorders and conservaon organisaons.
PhaseIHabitatSurvey: a standardised system for classifying and mapping wildlife habitats in all parts of Great
Britain, including urban areas. A Phase I Habitat Survey will also include target notes on any features of interest,
for example the presence of rare species, veteran trees or important habitat. An ‘Extended’ Phase I Survey is more
detailed, parcularly with regard to vegetaon. Phase I surveys can be conducted at any me of year although
vegetaon is easier to idenfy in spring or summer.
Semi-naturalhabitat: any habitat that is human managed (e.g. mown, grazed, coppiced, burned) or where human-
induced changes can be detected, but which sll seems a natural habitat in terms of species diversity and ecological
complexity. Semi-natural habitats have resulted from human acvies — mostly tradional agriculture and
shepherding — and have evolved into plant and animal communies of great interest and high biological diversity.
They are therefore part of Britain’s agrarian and social history.
Statutorynatureconservaonsite: an area of land which receives some form of statutory protecon for its nature
conservaon value. In Northamptonshire these include Special Protecon Areas (SPA), Naonal Nature Reserves
(NNR), Sites of Special Scienc Interest (SSSI) and Local Nature Reserves (LNR).
Veterantree: a tree that is of interest biologically, culturally or aesthecally because of its age, size or condion.
Some trees are instantly recognisable as veterans but many (e.g. old coppice stools) are less obvious. The girth of a
tree is not a reliable criterion because dierent species and individuals of tree have very dierent life spans and grow
at dierent rates.
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
15
PleaseanswerALLquesons
Pleaseck asappropriate
Q1
Is the applicaon for any of the following:
Residenal development which would increase the number
of units (e.g. C1, C2, C3)
Tourism or leisure facilies (e.g. D2)
New car park, or an increase to capacity of an exisng car
park
AND
Within 3km of the Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits SPA?
YES NO
Q2
Is the applicaon for Industrial development/warehousing (e.g.
B2, B8)
AND
Within 1km of the Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits SPA?
YES NO
IfyouhaveansweredYEStoQ1orQ2above,pleasecontactNaturalEnglandandrefertothe
Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits SPA Supplementary Planning Document
Q3
Please check whether and how the applicaon could aect a
SSSI (at hp://magic.defra.gov.uk). Based on the map search
results:
Is the applicaon located within an Impact Risk Zone for a SSSI
AND
For a proposal which falls into a category specied for that
Impact Risk Zone?
YES NO
Q4
Is the development on or within 100m of a Local Wildlife Site,
Potenal Wildlife Site or Local Nature Reserve?
YES NO
Q5
Are there any of the following:
Semi-natural habitats (e.g. woodland, grassland, pond,
reedbed, orchard)
Previously developed (browneld) land
Watercourse (e.g. stream, lake, ditch)
on, adjacent to or near the development site?
YES NO
IfyouhaveansweredYEStoANYofthequesonsabove
Further informaon is required to support your applicaon to show how the proposal has
accounted for the potenal impacts
Answer‘YES’inresponseto1APPQueson13b
Pleasegoto
secon1B
IfyouhaveansweredNOtoALLQuesons1-5above
Answer‘NO’inresponseto1APPQueson13b
Pleasegoto
secon2A
Appendix1 BiodiversityChecklist
Secon1A DesignatedSitesandPriorityHabitats(1APPQueson13b)
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
16
Secon1B
If the answer is ‘YES’ to any of the quesons in secon 1A, the applicaon documents must include a Biodiversity
Statement which demonstrates the following:
Extent and locaon of habitats and features that could be aected
Likely impacts to designated sites/priority habitat
How alternave designs and locaons have been considered
How adverse impacts will be avoided
How any unavoidable impacts will be migated
23
or reduced
How impacts that cannot be avoided or migated will be compensated
24
Proposals for biodiversity enhancements
Any protected species statements required as indicated by secon 2 below should be integrated within the
Biodiversity Statement. These reports may form part of a wider Environmental Impact Assessment.
Reports might not be required where applicants are able to provide pre-applicaon correspondence from Natural
England which conrms that they are sased that the proposal will not have an adverse impact on the SPAor any
SSSIorNNR.
NOWPLEASECOMPLETESECTION2
Secon2 ProtectedSpecies(1APPQueson13a)
Secon2A
Please answer ALL of the quesons in column A below, and ck the box in column B if the answer is ‘YES.
For each queson, the black dots in column C indicate those species with a ‘reasonable likelihood’ of being present,
and for which further surveys may be required.
In the shaded row please ck the appropriate boxes to summarise all species surveys which may be required.
2526
If ANY of the boxes in column B have been cked in response to any of the quesons ck‘YES’inresponseto1APP
Queson13a, and go to secon2B.
If NONE of the boxes in column B have been cked in response to any of the quesons ck‘NO’inresponseto1APP
Queson13a, and go to secon3.
Please note that the above list does not include all protected species and all circumstances where species may be
aected. In all circumstances legislaon pertaining to protected species sll applies and it is the responsibility of the
developer to ensure that protected species and habitats are not impacted as a result of development. If protected
species are found during the course of development, work should be halted and advice sought.
23 Migaon = measures which minimise the duraon, intensity and/or extent of impacts which cannot be avoided
enrely
24 Compensaon = measures which counterbalance the impacts, amending damage or loss
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
17
Speciesprotectedbylawandforwhichfurther
surveysmayberequired
DEVELOPMENTPROPOSALSTHATWILLTRIGGERA
POSSIBLEPROTECTEDSPECIESSURVEY
Tick
ifYES
Bats
Barnowl
Dormouse
Breedingbirds
25
Amphibians
Watervole
Badger
Oer
Reples
Will the proposed works aect
26
exisng buildings/
structures with ANY of the following features?
Clay-led pitched roofs
Lo spaces (including bell towers etc)
Hanging les
Wooden cladding
Open sots
Underground structures such as (but not exclusively)
cellars, air raid shelters, ice-houses, tunnels
Bridge structures, aqueducts or viaducts especially
over water or wet ground
Dense climbing plants
Bird boxes (especially owl boxes) or bat boxes which
have previously been ed
Large agricultural buildings, parcularly but not
exclusively those of a tradional construcon
Other buildings in a derelict or decayed state in a
rural locaon
Are there streams, rivers, lakes or other watercourses/
aquac habitat on or within 200m of the proposals?
Will the proposals aect
26
any areas of mature
deciduous woodland, eld hedgerows over 1m tall and
over 0.5m thick, or scrub well connected to woodland or
hedgerows on or adjacent to the site?
Will the proposals aect
26
any of the following
Old and veteran trees
Trees with obvious holes, cracks, cavies or heavy
vegetaon
Trees with a girth over 1m at chest height
Is the proposal a major applicaon within 500m or any
other applicaon within 200m of a pond?
Will the proposal aect
26
mature/overgrown gardens
over 0.25ha, any rough grassland or derelict/browneld
land, railway land, allotments, on or adjacent to the
site?
Will the proposal aect species-rich meadows or
grassland on or directly adjacent to the site?
Pleaseckboxestoindicateallprotectedspeciesthat
maybeaectedbythedevelopment
25 In Northamptonshire most likely kingsher, lile ringed plover, peregrine, hobby, red kite, quail and Ce’s warbler
26 Direct impacts such as removal or modicaon, or indirect through disturbance such as runo, noise, dust, lighng or
increased recreaonal use
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
18
Secon2B AssessmentsONLYforthosespeciespotenallyimpactedbythedevelopmentasidenedin
secon2A
For any species idened in secon 2A as potenally impacted by the proposed development:
1. Contact the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (www.northantsbrc.org.uk) for exisng species
records for the area
2. Conduct preliminary survey
27
to establish potenal for habitat to support the species
3. Using the results of the preliminary survey, determine whether A or B below applies.
Pleasecktherelevantboxbelow() andaachcorrespondingassessmenttoapplicaon
A
IFTHEPRELIMINARYSURVEYINDICATESMODERATE/HIGHLIKELIHOODOFPROTECTED
SPECIESBEINGPRESENT,AFULLSURVEYANDMITIGATIONSTATEMENTAREREQUIRED
PLEASEINCLUDE:
Extent and locaon of species populaons (including supporng habitats and features) that could be
aected (more detailed surveys will be required)
Likely impacts on species populaons
How alternave designs and locaon have been considered
How adverse impacts will be avoided wherever possible
How unavoidable impacts will be migated or reduced
How impacts that cannot be avoided or migated with be compensated
Proposals for biodiversity enhancements
Pleasenote:aprotectedspecieslicencemayberequiredinordertocarryouttheseworks.Pleasereferto
NaturalEnglandguidance.
B
IFTHEPRELIMINARYSURVEYINDICATESLITTLEORNOLIKELIHOODOFPROTECTEDSPECIES
BEINGPRESENT,ORTHEREARENOLIKELYIMPACTSTOSPECIES,FULLSURVEYISNOT
REQUIRED
Please provide the informaon required to demonstrate that there will be lile or no likelihood of protected
species being present, or there are no likely impacts on species. This can be in the form of a brief statement or
leer from a suitably qualied person.
To improve the quality of the data held by the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre, applicants are
encouraged to submit to the Centre data generated by protected species surveys.
Ifabiodiversitystatementistobesubmiedwiththeapplicaonasrequiredbysecon1B,thenpleaseinclude
anyspeciessurveysaswell.
NOWPLEASECOMPLETESECTION3
27 Surveys should:
Be of appropriate scope and detail
Be conducted at an appropriate me of year, in suitable weather condions and using recognised
methodologies
Be undertaken by an appropriately qualied and experienced person
Include copies of any correspondence with nature conservaon organisaons (such as Natural England,
Environment Agency)
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
19
Secon3 Validaonchecklist
Please mark with an X in the shaded column ALL biodiversity informaon included with this applicaon resulng
from the prompng of the biodiversity checklist.
Please note that if all required informaon is not included with the applicaon then it will NOT be validated.
*requiredforallapplicaons
Thankyouforcomplengthischecklist.Pleasereturntothelocalauthorityallcompletedsecons,alongwiththe
applicaonandallsupplementaryinformaonindicatedabove.
Oceuseonly
Tickif
included
Required Aached
BiodiversityChecklistSECTION1A*
(designatedsitesandpriorityhabitats)
X
Secon 1B Biodiversity Statement
BiodiversityChecklistSECTION2A*
(protectedspecies)
X
Secton 2B Protected Species Survey(s)/statement(s)
Bats
Barn owl
Dormouse
Breeding birds
Amphibians
Water vole
Badger
Oer
Reples
Correspondence from nature conservaon organisaon/local
authority/other (as indicated by the checklist)
Biodiversity SPD for Northamptonshire — August 2015
20
Licence
required?
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Badgers Y
Bats (hibernaon roosts) Y
Bats (summer roosts) Y
Bats (foraging/commung) Y
Birds (breeding) N
Birds (overwintering) N
Dormice (nut searches) N
Dormice (nest searches) Y
Dormice (cage traps/hair
tube surveys
Y
Fish some Opmal survey season varies with species
Greatcrestednewts
(terrestrial surveys
Y
Greatcrestednewts
(aquac surveys: ponds etc)
Y
Invertebrates N
Oers Y
Reples:commonlizard Y
Reples:other N
Watervoles Y
Habitats:PhaseIsurveys N
Vegetaon:mosses,lichens N
Vegetaon:higherplants N
Opmal survey season Sub-opmal survey season Do not survey during this me
Appendix2Ecologicalsurveycalendar