!
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !!
! ! !
!
!
!! ! ! !!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '
' '
'
! ' !
! ! ! ! ! !
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
!!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
& & & & & & & & & & & &
& & & & & & & &&
'
'
'
'
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
California! State University, Chico!
Division of Student Affairs
Student Judicial Affairs
Annual Report 2016-2017
I. Departmental Mission Statement
Student' Judicial Affairs supports the mission of the university by promoting a' fair and positive learning
environment for all students, faculty, and staff. The program advances student' development' by adjudicating
reports regarding student' behavior and complaints of alleged unfair treatment' of students in a' timely,
consistent, and fair manner.
(Reviewed 7/17)
Department Goals:
Protect Rights and Ensure Due Process
Respond to student' behavioral concerns in an unbiased, fair, and reasonable manner.
Protect' the rights of students who have been victims of misconduct' as well as those accused of
misconduct.
Restoration:
Facilitate the process of individuals and organizations taking responsibility for their assigned roles
in the conduct' system.
Provide learning experiences for students whose conduct' may not' be consistent' with institutional
expectations as well as for those students who participate in the operations of the student'
conduct' system.
Balance the needs and interests of individuals with the needs and interests of the institution, the
community, and others who may have an interest' in the matter or outcome.
Education!and!Outreach:!
Initiate and encourage outreach activities that' serve to educate the community about' the student'
conduct' program and individual responsibilities within the program.
Develop, disseminate, interpret, and enforce institutional policies and procedures regarding
student' as well as group/organizational behavioral expectations.
Ensure that' all students, faculty, staff, or community members involved in the administration of
the student' conduct' program are sufficiently prepared and trained.
Goals align with CSU Chico Strategic& Priority 1; Division of Student& Affairs Goal 1
Established using Council of Academic& Standards, July 2017
1
+ + + ++
& & & & & & & & & & &
& & & & & & & & & &
& & & & & &
'
! ! + ++++++
' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' '''
' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ''
'
! ! ! ! !!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ''''
'
!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ''
''
' ' ''
' ' ''
'
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
Recruitment, Retention, Satisfaction, Graduation:
Being a victim& or&engaging&in high risk behaviors or conduct& which is not& consistent& with the student&
conduct& code, and/or facing unresolved conflict& have a significant& impact& on retention, satisfaction and
graduation. These goals are developed to assist
students resolve such issues and to enable students’
progression toward and timely completion of educational goals and preparation for their careers,
citizenship, and lives.
II. Departmental Accomplishments -A+ Highlight
Continued revision of procedures
Continued revision of the SJA website to be more user friendly
Collaboration with housing conduct' staff to realign conduct' in housing vs. Title 5 violations
Recruitment' of new Hearing Officers/training; held annually
Outreach and training to campus community
Initiated revision of Grievance Executive Memorandum
Implemented restorative justice sanctions
Improved relationships with the City of Chico Police and Fire Departments
Expanded relationships with Study Abroad and Academic Affairs in response to the academic needs of
international students.
Continued to develop resources for non-English speakers, including live translation services for students
involved in conduct' proceedings.
Continued outreach efforts for underrepresented students, especially in regard to DHR incidents and
academic grievances
Hearing Officer Recruitment and Training
In collaboration with the Title IX' Coordinator, SJA recruited several new hearing officers, and conducted
annual required training for Title IX' and general conduct' hearings. Hearing officers represent' current'
administrators on campus from the Division of Student' Affairs, as well as, local attorneys. This effort' is a'
true collaboration between the campus and the community. Hearing officers are volunteers who are as
committed to ensuring our students are held responsible for conduct' and have the opportunity to restore
trust' in the community.
Outreach !and !Training!the!Campus!Community
SJA staff has participated in significant' outreach activities on campus, including training on Title 5, academic
integrity and Title IX, including presentations/training for:
Academic coaches
Student' athletes
Council of Deans
Council of Chairs
Enrollment' Management
2
' ' ''
'
' ' ' ''
' ' ' '''
' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ''
! ! ! ! ! ! !!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
!
!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
'
!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
'
' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
'
' '
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
Residence Life staff
Greek'Life
Education Outreach and Support' Programs
Campus Alcohol Education Center
Classroom presentations to students regarding academic integrity
Faculty presentations regarding academic integrity
Town Hall presentation (serving as a' consultant) on sexual assault' on campus
Summer Orientation
Improved! relationships with the !City!of !Chico Police and Fire Departments
This year, the SJA team made considerable efforts to improve the partnership with Chico Police
Department' and the Chico Fire Department. Both departments appointed new Chiefs, so the timing
was right' to meet' and establish liaison with each department. The renewed partnerships has greatly
improved our ability to obtain summary reports of incidents involving our students, as well as, an
opportunity to rely on each other for creative and alternative ways to manage incidents
Diversity !Efforts:
See SJA Diversity Plan for additional information and progress toward diversity specific goals.
III. !Changes !in !Policies !and !P ro c e d u r e s
SJA continues to audit' its policies, procedures and guidelines as new guidance regarding the implementation
Title 5 of the California' Code of Regulations and Title IX' of the Education Amendments are provided.
As a' result' of considerable assessment' and consideration, behavior which is inconsistent' to housing policies
that' are not' violations of Title 5 are managed by residential staff starting AY 2016-2017. The culture shift' in
housing (and collaterally SJA) will take time and require ongoing collaboration and assessment. Both
programs will focus more on integrating developmental theories and restorative justice resolutions.''
Several business practices were developed and/or revised this year, including case management, record
access and retention, respondent' letters, notice of investigation and outcomes, meeting with high-ri s k'
students, and interim suspension notices,' development' and use of sanction worksheets to ensure
consistency.'
3
'
!!!
!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
''
''
! !!!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '''
'
! ! ! ! ! ! ! '
' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' '
'
' ' ' '
' ' '
' ' ' ' '
' '
'
'
!!
' ' '
'
! ! ! ! !!
!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' '''
' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '''
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
IV. !Resource s !Summary
The Vice President' of Student' Affairs provides sufficient' allocation to cover the operating expenses of SJA.
Training requirements are increasingly mandated. As such, training may require additional allocation in the
future.
Human Resources:
Plans are in place to move a' current' SSPIII' to a' MPP position so that' employee can investigate Title IX'
complaints beginning fall 2017.
SJA was represented on! the following committees this past!year:
Educational Policies and Programs- Committee (EPPC)
Faculty and Student Policies Committee (FASP)
Campus'Assessment, 'Response, 'Evaluation'Team'(CARE)
Title IX Oversight Committee
Student'Affairs Diversity Committee
National College 'Health'Improvement Program' (NCHIP) Advisory Committee
Staff Council
Black'Staff'and'Faculty'Committee'
Facilities/Equipment:
Nothing significant' to report
V. Program Evaluation of Past Year
1. Continue to assess practices and policies to ensure compliance, efficiency and effectiveness. The SJA
team continues to assess the need for, develop and revise business practices/procedures. Because
the world of conduct' and Title IX' continues to evolve, this assessment' process will be an on going
effort' for the team.
2. Implement' a' new data' base system. SJA (and housing) have almost' completed the process of
implementing a' new data' base system (Maxient). This is the system that' is most' widely used and
recommended by the CSU and other systems nation wide. Implementation will continue throughout'
the fall 2017 semester, but' the objective is considered met' and will be discontinued.
3. Develop additional assessment' and data' collection opportunities. Despite our best' efforts to re
group regarding assessment, SJA team has more work to do. SJA will have an assessment' strategy in
place by Spring 2018.
4
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
''
' '
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
4. Develop an outreach program to both students and staff/faculty regarding SJA’s processes and scope
of responsibility. SJA team has begun working on a' marketing campaign and hopes to launch the
campaign the fall 2017 semester.
5. Continue to develop restorative justice opportunities alternate to punitive sanctions. The SJA team,
in collaboration with the housing conduct' team, have developed several restorative justice sanction
opportunities. The team intends to widely use these sanctions in lieu of punitive sanctions when
appropriate.
5
! !
'
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' & & & & & & & & & & ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
Ongoing! Assessment Efforts
Reported Violations of the Student Code of Conduct (Title 5):
The following numbers reflect' students found responsible for a' violation/violations of the Student' Conduct'
Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Article 2, Section 41301(b), for the academic year 2016-17.
The number of convictions can differ from the number of cases and sanctions in that' some cases involve
multiple Title 5 violations.
TITLE 5
CHARGE
DESCRIPTION OF
VIOLATION
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
(1a)
Cheating, plagiarism, or other
forms of academic dishonesty
54
58
78
40
23
(1b)
Furnishing false information
to a University official,
faculty member, or campus
office
2
1
2
0
3
(1c)
Forgery, alteration, or misuse
of a University document,
key, or identification
instrument
0
1
1
7
3
(1d)
Misrepresenting oneself to be
an authorized agent of the
University or one of its
auxiliaries
0
0
1
0
0
(2)
Unauthorized entry into,
presence in, use of, or misuse
of University Property
5
8
12
3
3
(3)
Willful, material and
substantial disruption or
obstruction of a University-
related activity or any on
0
0
1
0
0
6
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
campus activity
(4)
Participating in any activity
that substantially and
materially disrupts the
normal operation of the
University
0
0
5
1
1
(5)
Willful, material and
substantial obstruction of the
free flow of pedestrian or
other traffic, on or leading to
campus property or an off-
campus University-related
activity
1
0
0
0
0
(6)
Disorderly, lewd, indecent, or
obscene behavior at a
University-related activity or
directed toward a member of
the University community
8
9
12
5
3
(7)
Conduct that threatens or
endangers the health or safety
of any person within or
related to the University
community, including
physical abuse, threats,
intimidation, harassment, or
sexual misconduct
20
21
35
12
14
(8)
Hazing or conspiracy to haze.
6
0
0
0
0
(9)
Use possession, manufacture,
or distribution of illegal
drugs or drug-related
paraphernalia or the misuse
of legal pharmaceutical drugs
35
29
36
12
1*
7
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
(10)
Use, possession, manufacture,
or distribution of alcoholic
beverages or public
intoxication while on campus
or at a University-related
activity
324
330
309
263
3*
(11)
Theft of property or services
from the University
community or
misappropriation of
University resources
9
6
6
1
1
(12)
Unauthorized destruction or
damage to University
property or other property in
the University community
4
4
2
5
3
(13)
Possession or misuse of
firearms or guns, replicas,
ammunition, explosives,
fireworks, knives, other
weapons, or dangerous
chemicals on campus or at a
University-related activity
4
4
4
4
2
(14)
Unauthorized recording,
dissemination, or publication
or academic presentations for
commercial purposes
0
0
0
0
0
(15a)
Unauthorized entry into a
computer file, for any
purpose
0
0
0
0
0
(15b)
Unauthorized transfer of a
computer file
0
0
0
0
0
(15c)
Use of another’s computer
identification or password
0
0
0
0
0
8
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
(15f)
Use of computing facilities
and resources to interfere
with normal University
operations
0
0
0
0
0
(15g)
Use of computing facilities
and resources in violation of
copyright laws
5
16
13
14
2
(15h)
Violation of campus
computer use policy
0
0
0
0
0
(16)
Violation of any published
University policy, rule,
regulation, or presidential
order
3
3
15
5
6
(17)
Failure to comply with
directions or, interference
with, any University official
or any public safety officer
acting in the performance of
his/her duties.
16
14
20
5
5
(18)
Any act chargeable as a
violation of a federal, state, or
local law that poses a
substantial threat to the safety
or well 2being of the campus
community
5
19
31
6
10
(19a)
Falsification, distortion, or
misrepresentation of
information related to a
student discipline matter
0
0
0
4
0
9
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
(19b)
Disruption or interference
with the orderly progress of a
student discipline proceeding
0
0
0
1
0
(19c)
Initiation of a student
discipline proceeding in bad
faith
0
0
0
0
0
(19d)
Attempting to discourage
another from participating in
the student discipline matter
0
0
0
0
0
(19e)
Attempting to influence the
impartiality of any
participant in a student
discipline matter
0
0
0
0
0
(19f)
Verbal or physical
harassment or intimidation of
any participant in a student
discipline matter
3
1
0
1
0
(19g)
Failure to comply with the
sanction(s) imposed under a
student discipline proceeding
4
6
4
6
1
(20)
Encourage, permitting, or
assisting another to do any
act that could subject him or
her to student discipline
1
0
1
1
0
TOTAL
509
586
694
396
84*
* See Section VII for discussion
! ! !
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '''
! ! ! ! ! !
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
& & & &&
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
Academic Integrity Violations:
In all cases of academic integrity, faculty reserve the right' to assign course grades and have the option of
assigning a' student' a' failing grade on a' particular assignment' or “F” for the entire course.
This year we saw a' decrease in the number of students reported and subsequently found responsible for
Academic Dishonesty violations. When compared to the total number of incidents reported, there was an
increase in “Report-only” incidents received (report' filed but' no action taken by SJA), which results in a' lower
number of Academic Dishonesty convictions overall. “Report-only” incidents may still be considered as part'
of' a' conduct' history, in the event' that' a' student' is referred for any subsequent' academic integrity violations.
Due to the absence of the majority of faculty and the student' population during summer break, many
Academic Dishonesty incidents which are referred following the close of Spring semester (end of May and
throughout' June), end up being adjudicated at' the start' of the following Fall semester. There are currently 11
pending Academic Dishonesty incidents from the 2016-17 academic year.
Conduct Sanctions and Other Disciplinary Actions:
The following represents sanctions and other disciplinary actions imposed on students found in violation of
one or more Title 5 violations. These sanctions are authorized by CSU Executive Order 1098, Student& Conduct&
Procedures and may result' in a' notation on a' student’s transcript. Students may receive one or more
sanction(s) per incident, as well as additional educational “conditions” to be completed prior to expiration of
sanction.
SANCTION
2012-13
2012-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
Education and Remedial
Sanction (Restorative
Justice themes)
56
95
91
161
15*
Disciplinary Probation
411
347
370
211
40*
Suspension
5
5
7
8
4
Expulsion
0
0
1
4
1
Denial to Campus
5
5
10
2
1
No Contact Order
8
5
16
6
3
TOTAL
485
457
484
392
64*
*See Section VII& for discussion
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
! ! ! !!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
!
!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
& & & & &&
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation (DHR) and Sexual Misconduct (Title IX):
Below is a' summary of Title IX' and DHR' incidents reported to SJA, many of which did'not result' in a' formal
complaint' or investigation pursuant' to CSU Executive Order 1074 (2012 2012) or Executive Order 1097
(2014' present). Many of the reports received by the Title IX Coordinator 'come 'from'Third'Parties, 'and'no
formal complaint is'filed. In such'cases, SJA staff may have attempted to investigate with the information
received, or may have provided referrals for support, remediation, or other accommodations, without
having sufficient'information to proceed with a Formal Investigation.
Violation / Year
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
Title IX
10
29
52
53
101
DHR
0
16
22
11
13
Total
20
35
74
64
114
Additional reports / Incidents
Student' Judicial Affairs receives referrals for incidents that do not' constitute a' violation of the student'
conduct' code, a' Title IX' or DHR' violation, or a' student' grievance. This may include referrals from outside
agencies, non-conduct' residential issues, or students who evaluated by the Campus Assessment' Response
and Education (CARE) team. These reports are entered into the SJA case management' system for the
purpose of tracking and analytics, but' may not' result' in a' student' conference or discipline imposed. Twenty-
eight' referrals of this nature were'received 'during' the 2016-17 academic year.
Recidivism:
Our goal during the discipline process is to have students take responsibility for their actions and behavior,
and learn from their experiences in order to avoid consequences in the future. One measure of our success'is'
the rate of recidivism, or repeated conduct' violations. Recidivism rates are used to track the number of
students who violate the student' conduct' code during or after the time they have been placed on a' sanction
for a' previous violation.
The summary provided below shows the number of students who were adjudicated for more than one Title
5 violation, as well as the most' common violations, in the last' five years:
RECIDIVISM ALL TITLE 5 VIOLATIONS
Academic Year
Second
Violation
Third
Violation
Fourth
Violation
Fifth+
Violation
2012-13
434
95
35
17
2013-14
272
38
8
0
2014-15
207
36
11
1
2015-16
216
31
6
0
2016-17
17*
3
1
0
*See section VII& for discussion
& & &
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
RECIDIVISM ACADEMIC DISHONESTY VIOLATIONS
Academic Year
Second
Violation
Third
Violation
Fourth
Violation
Fifth+
Violation
2012-13
3
0
0
0
2013-14
20
1
0
0
2014-15
19
1
0
0
2015-16
23
2
0
0
2016-17
9
1
0
0
RECIDIVISM ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS
Academic Year
Second
Violation
Third
Violation
Fourth
Violation
Fifth+
Violation
2012-13
21
2
0
0
2013-14
54
16
0
0
2014-15
109
13
2
0
2015-16
110
13
2
0
2016-17
63*
9
2
0
*See section VII& for discussion
RECIDIVISM DRUG VIOLATIONS
Academic Year
Second
Violation
Third
Violation
Fourth
Violation
Fifth+
Violation
2012-13
1
0
0
0
2013-14
4
0
0
0
2014-15
3
0
0
0
2015-16
2
0
0
0
2016-17
1
0
0
0
!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '''
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
Gender Breakdown of Title 5 convictions:
Gender/Year
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
Male
63%
54%
69%
64%
66%
Female
37%
46%
31%
36%
34%
Grievances:
Grievances can be filed by students to address a number of concerns, but' are most' often filed in'response to
an academic/grade concern. A representative from Student Judicial Affairs is assigned to review the issue in
question to determine grievability, and'to'assist'students'through'the'grievance'process.'Students'are'
encouraged to resolve' complaints informally' if possible.
If attempts to resolve an issue informally fail, students have the right to request a formal grievance hearing
on the matter. In every case, the goal is the same; reasonable and orderly resolution in a fair, consistent,
and timely manner.
Executive Memorandum 05-10 governs the informal and formal grievance process.' SJA has initiated
proposed revision of this Executive Memorandum due to its inefficient' and complicated processes. Both
students and staff/faculty find the process cumbersome and confusing.
Student Status/Year
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
Undergraduate
54
50
50
34
39
Graduate
2
7
7
3
5
Total
56
57
57
37
44
Grievance Type/Year
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
Non-Academic Grievance
22
20
6
3
5
Grievance re Grades
18
21
20
10
12
Grievance Resulting in
Grade Change
1
3
2
3
2
Grievance re Syllabus
2
2
2
1
2
!
!
& & & & & & & & & & &&
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
''
!
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '''
' '
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
Dismissal From Program
1
5
2
1
2
Grievance re Instructor
8
10
16
16
11
Other Grievances
7
18
19
8
1
Formal Hearings
0
0
3
4
0
Hearing Outcome in
Favor of Student
0
0
0
1
0
Student!Learning!Outcomes!
Through an interaction with Student& Judicial Affairs, students will . . .
1. Understand the Student' Conduct' Code and its importance to the University community
2. Develop' self-efficacy by representing themselves throughout' the process and discussing their
involvement' in behavior that' violates University expectations (aka, taking responsibility)
3. Be given the resources and knowledge necessary to assist' in making informed future 'decisions'
4. Become more familiar with campus policies regarding the grievance and discipline processes
5. Better understand that' their behavior impacts many people in the campus and greater Chico
community, and that' consequences may result' from behavior that' violates these community
standards
Student!Satisfaction!
It' would be a' misnomer to characterize the current' SJA survey as a' measure of “student' satisfaction,” since
survey respondents are required to complete the survey after being referred for discipline, an involuntary
experience. The SJA team took time this year to consider alternative assessment' strategies to assess both
student' learning outcomes and student' satisfaction.
! !!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '''
'
! ! ! ! ! ! !!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'''
!
! ! ! ! ! !!!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' '''
'
! ! !!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '''
'
! ! ! !!!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '''
'
!
! ! ! ! !!!!
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
VII. Analysis
The following is offered as discussion and analysis of issues and services that' require strategic and intentional
consideration in the next' academic/fiscal year.
Discussion regarding alcohol violations and respective sanctions*!
Prior to the start' of this academic year, Student' Judicial Affairs and University Housing reevaluated their
standards for referring alcohol (#10) and drug (#9) violations for incidents occurring in the residence halls.
The change effected when students were referred to SJA for a' Title 5 conduct' violation versus when the
incident' was addressed as a' University Housing policy violation only (these are handled by UH' staff and are
not' a' considered conduct' by SJA or Title 5 standards). The decrease in total students found responsible for
these conduct' violations is a' result' of that' change. The number of Educational Sanctions and Disciplinary
Probation sanctions imposed has decreased significantly as a' result' of fewer alcohol and drug related Title 5
violations being referred for conduct' from University Housing. Students found in violation of residence hall
policies are addressed by UH' staff and are no longer included in the annual statistics for Student' Judicial
Affairs. Additional time (across years data) will inform how this change is working in terms of overall student'
behavior/conduct.
Improved! Data! Collection,! assessment, and Revised Student Learning Outcomes
There continues to be room to improve the type and manner of data' collection and how that' data' informs' a'
comprehensive assessment' process, including identifying strategies for program growth. A great' deal of
data' is collected, but' without' sufficient' context' to understand the relevance or impact' of the data. The
current' data' collected does not' paint' a' full picture of how services and sanctions directly relate to changes in
data/numbers of incidents. SJA will be implementing a' new database fall 2017 that' claims to have excellent'
reporting functions. SJA will spend this year learning about' the new database and how robust' it' is for
reporting and analytics.
Sanction Case Management
There is room to improve sanction case management. The number of referrals for substance abuse
assessment' though CADEC that' aren’t' completed is concerning. While SJA can and does place holds on these
student' records, it' does not address the issue at' hand. If SJA staff refers a' student' for assessment, there is
significant' concern about' high-risk behavior. Delaying that' assessment' may factor in higher recidivism rates
and jeopardize student' health and safety.
Philosophical !Shift to Restorative Justice
SJA will continue to explore, use and assess the use of alternative sanctions favoring restorative justice
methods. We believe that' outcomes and/or sanctions imposed as a' result' of conduct' code violations are
educational, developmental, not' solely punitive, appropriately and equitably assigned, address the overall
safety needs of those involved in the process as well as the general campus community, and attend to any
impacts and harms of the behavior on the community or others.
Refining Our Scope of Authority:
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
!
!
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''
'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '!
!
Student Judicial Affairs Annual Report 2016-2017
SJA continues to consider our scope of authority and responsibility on campus. Additionally, we have
revisited our responsibility and authority in terms of grievances, specifically, applying the grievability
standard. Not' all conflict' or complaints rise to the level of grievability and fall under SJA’s jurisdiction.
Furthermore, we have initiated a' proposed revision of the grievance policy in order to more specifically
clarify process and procedures. Furthermore, there is a' campus culture that' all conflicts or disagreements
with students regarding academic decisions are referred to SJA. However, SJA has little or no jurisdiction
over academic decisions unless those decisions can be proven discriminatory or capricious. Additionally,
students who choose to complain about' instructors (behavior, teaching style) are also referred to SJA when
academic supervisory personnel are more appropriate to manage these issues.'''
VI. Program!Objectives!for!next !academic!year!
1. Continue to assess practices and policies to ensure compliance, consistency and effectiveness.
2. Revise assessment' and data' collection opportunities
3. Develop an outreach program to both students and staff/faculty regarding SJA’s processes and
scope of responsibility.
4. Continue to develop restorative justice opportunities alternate to punitive sanctions.
5. Continue efforts to revise the grievance executive memorandum.
Report' Prepared by Sandy Parsons, Dean of Students, with contributions from SJA staff